American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
May  2017, 22(3): 1049-1072. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017052

Advection control in parabolic PDE systems for competitive populations

Kokum R. De Silva 1, , Tuoc V. Phan 2, and  Suzanne Lenhart 2,,

1. 

Department of Mathematics, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, KY 20400, Sri Lanka
2. 

Department of Mathematics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-1320, USA

* Corresponding author: lenhart@math.utk.edu

Received  May 2016 Revised  December 2016 Published  January 2017

This paper investigates the response of two competing species to a given resource using optimal control techniques. We explore the choices of directed movement through controlling the advective coefficients in a system of parabolic partial differential equations. The objective is to maximize the abundance represented by a weighted combination of the two populations while minimizing the 'risk' costs caused by the movements.

Keywords: Optimal control, advection direction, competitive systems, partial differential equations, parabolic system.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 49K20, 92B05; Secondary: 35K5.
Citation: Kokum R. De Silva, Tuoc V. Phan, Suzanne Lenhart. Advection control in parabolic PDE systems for competitive populations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (3) : 1049-1072. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017052
References:
[1]

F. Belgacem and C. Cosner, The effects of dispersal along environmental gradients on the dynamics of populations in heterogeneous environment, Canadian Applied Mathematics Quarterly, 3 (1995), 379-397.   Google Scholar

[2]

R. S. Cantrell and C. Cosner, Diffusive logistic equations with indefinite weights: Population models in disrupted environments Ⅱ, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 22 (1991), 1043-1064.  doi: 10.1137/0522068.  Google Scholar

[3]

R. S. Cantrell and C. Cosner, The effects of spatial heterogeneity in population dynamics, Journal of Mathematical Biology, 29 (1991), 315-338.  doi: 10.1007/BF00167155.  Google Scholar

[4]

R. S. Cantrell and C. Cosner, Spatial Ecology via Reaction-Diffusion Equations, Wiley Series in Mathematical and Computational Biology, 2003. Google Scholar

[5]

R. S. Cantrell, C. Cosner and Y. Lou, Advection-mediated coexistence of competing species, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A, 137 (2007), 497-518.  doi: 10.1017/S0308210506000047.  Google Scholar

[6]

C. Cosner and Y. Lou, Does movement towards better environments always benefit a population?, Journal of Mathematical analysis and Applications, 277 (2003), 489-503.  doi: 10.1016/S0022-247X(02)00575-9.  Google Scholar

[7]

W. Ding, H. Finotti, S. Lenhart, Y. Lou and Q. Ye, Optimal control of growth coefficient on a steady-state population model, Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, 11 (2010), 688-704.  doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2009.01.015.  Google Scholar

[8]

L. C. Evans, Partial Differential Equations, 2nd edition, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2010. Google Scholar

[9]

H. Finotti, S. Lenhart and T. V. Phan, Optimal control of advective direction in reaction-diffusion population models, Evolution equations and control theory, 1 (2012), 81-107.  doi: 10.3934/eect.2012.1.81.  Google Scholar

[10]

W. Hackbusch, A numerical method for solving parabolic equations with opposite orientations, Computing, 20 (1978), 229-240.  doi: 10.1007/BF02251947.  Google Scholar

[11]

M. R. Kelly, Jr. Y. Xing and S. Lenhart, Optimal fish harvesting for a population modeled by a nonlinear parabolic partial differential equation, Natural Resources Modeling Journal, 29 (2016), 36-70.  doi: 10.1111/nrm.12073.  Google Scholar

[12]

S. Lenhart and J. T. Workman, Optimal Control Applied to Biological Models, Chapman and Hall/CRC Mathematical and Computational Biology Series, 2007. Google Scholar

[13]

J. Simon, Compact sets in the $L^p(0,T;B)$, Annali di Matematica Pure ed Applicata, 146 (1987), 65-96.  doi: 10.1007/BF01762360.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

F. Belgacem and C. Cosner, The effects of dispersal along environmental gradients on the dynamics of populations in heterogeneous environment, Canadian Applied Mathematics Quarterly, 3 (1995), 379-397.   Google Scholar

[2]

R. S. Cantrell and C. Cosner, Diffusive logistic equations with indefinite weights: Population models in disrupted environments Ⅱ, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 22 (1991), 1043-1064.  doi: 10.1137/0522068.  Google Scholar

[3]

R. S. Cantrell and C. Cosner, The effects of spatial heterogeneity in population dynamics, Journal of Mathematical Biology, 29 (1991), 315-338.  doi: 10.1007/BF00167155.  Google Scholar

[4]

R. S. Cantrell and C. Cosner, Spatial Ecology via Reaction-Diffusion Equations, Wiley Series in Mathematical and Computational Biology, 2003. Google Scholar

[5]

R. S. Cantrell, C. Cosner and Y. Lou, Advection-mediated coexistence of competing species, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A, 137 (2007), 497-518.  doi: 10.1017/S0308210506000047.  Google Scholar

[6]

C. Cosner and Y. Lou, Does movement towards better environments always benefit a population?, Journal of Mathematical analysis and Applications, 277 (2003), 489-503.  doi: 10.1016/S0022-247X(02)00575-9.  Google Scholar

[7]

W. Ding, H. Finotti, S. Lenhart, Y. Lou and Q. Ye, Optimal control of growth coefficient on a steady-state population model, Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, 11 (2010), 688-704.  doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2009.01.015.  Google Scholar

[8]

L. C. Evans, Partial Differential Equations, 2nd edition, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2010. Google Scholar

[9]

H. Finotti, S. Lenhart and T. V. Phan, Optimal control of advective direction in reaction-diffusion population models, Evolution equations and control theory, 1 (2012), 81-107.  doi: 10.3934/eect.2012.1.81.  Google Scholar

[10]

W. Hackbusch, A numerical method for solving parabolic equations with opposite orientations, Computing, 20 (1978), 229-240.  doi: 10.1007/BF02251947.  Google Scholar

[11]

M. R. Kelly, Jr. Y. Xing and S. Lenhart, Optimal fish harvesting for a population modeled by a nonlinear parabolic partial differential equation, Natural Resources Modeling Journal, 29 (2016), 36-70.  doi: 10.1111/nrm.12073.  Google Scholar

[12]

S. Lenhart and J. T. Workman, Optimal Control Applied to Biological Models, Chapman and Hall/CRC Mathematical and Computational Biology Series, 2007. Google Scholar

[13]

J. Simon, Compact sets in the $L^p(0,T;B)$, Annali di Matematica Pure ed Applicata, 146 (1987), 65-96.  doi: 10.1007/BF01762360.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  Different resource functions $m(x)$
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2.  Different initial conditions: (2a) Smaller initial population at middle, (2b) Larger initial population at middle, (2c) Two smaller initial populations overlapping in the middle
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3.  One population only: Population dynamics and optimal control for $u$ population with the resource function $m=x/5$ as in Figure 1a; (3a) Optimal control $h_1$ with respect to the IC in Figure 2a, (3b) Population distribution of $u$ with respect to the IC in Figure 2a, (3c) Optimal control $h_1$ with respect to the IC in Figure 2b, (3d) Population distribution of $u$ with respect to the IC in Figure 2b
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4.  One population only: Population dynamics and optimal control for $u$ population with the resource function $m=sin(\pi x/5)$ as in Figure 1b; (4a) Optimal control $h_1$ with respect to the IC in Figure 2a, (4b) Population distribution of $u$ with respect to the IC in Figure 2a, (4c) Optimal control $h_1$ with respect to the IC in Figure 2b, (4d) Population distribution of $u$ with respect to the IC in Figure 2b
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 5.  One population only: Population dynamics and optimal control with a smaller IC as in Figure 2a and larger resources $m=6x/5$ as in Figure 1c; (5a) Optimal control $h_1$, (5b) Population distribution of $u$
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 6.  Two populations with competition: Population dynamics and optimal control with a smaller IC as in Figure 2a and the resource function $m=x/5$ as given in Figure 1a; (6a) Optimal control $h_1$, (6b) Population distribution of $u$
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 7.  Two populations with competition: Population dynamics and optimal control with a smaller IC as in Figure 2a and the resource function $m=sin(\pi x/5)$ as given in Figure 1b; (7a) Optimal control $h_1$, (7b) Population distribution of $u$
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 8.  Two populations with competition: Population dynamics and optimal control with a smaller IC as in Figure 2c and the resource function $m=x/5$ as given in Figure 1a; (8a) Optimal control $h_1$, (8b) Population distribution of $u$, (8c) Optimal control $h_2$, (8d) Population distribution of $v$
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 9.  Two populations with competition: Population dynamics and optimal control with a smaller IC as in Figure 2c and the resource function $m=sin(\pi x/5)$ as given in Figure 1b; (9a) Optimal control $h_1$, (9b) Population distribution of $u$, (9c) Optimal control $h_2$, (9d) Population distribution of $v$
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 10.  Two populations with different competition rates: Population dynamics and optimal control with a smaller IC as in Figure 2a and the resource function $m=sin(\pi x/5)$ as given in Figure 1b and $b_1 = 4$, $b_2 = 0.5$; (10a) Optimal control $h_1$, (10b) Population distribution of $u$, (10c) Optimal control $h_2$, (10d) Population distribution of $v$
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

[1]

Yves Achdou, Mathieu Laurière. On the system of partial differential equations arising in mean field type control. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2015, 35 (9) : 3879-3900. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.3879
[2]

Frank Pörner, Daniel Wachsmuth. Tikhonov regularization of optimal control problems governed by semi-linear partial differential equations. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2018, 8 (1) : 315-335. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2018013
[3]

Ishak Alia. Time-inconsistent stochastic optimal control problems: A backward stochastic partial differential equations approach. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2019, 0 (0) : 0-0. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020020
[4]

Lijuan Wang, Qishu Yan. Optimal control problem for exact synchronization of parabolic system. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2019, 9 (3) : 411-424. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2019019
[5]

Frédéric Mazenc, Christophe Prieur. Strict Lyapunov functions for semilinear parabolic partial differential equations. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2011, 1 (2) : 231-250. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2011.1.231
[6]

Kexue Li, Jigen Peng, Junxiong Jia. Explosive solutions of parabolic stochastic partial differential equations with lévy noise. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2017, 37 (10) : 5105-5125. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017221
[7]

Paul Bracken. Exterior differential systems and prolongations for three important nonlinear partial differential equations. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2011, 10 (5) : 1345-1360. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2011.10.1345
[8]

Eduardo Casas, Konstantinos Chrysafinos. Analysis and optimal control of some quasilinear parabolic equations. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2018, 8 (3&4) : 607-623. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2018025
[9]

Michela Eleuteri, Pavel Krejčí. An asymptotic convergence result for a system of partial differential equations with hysteresis. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2007, 6 (4) : 1131-1143. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2007.6.1131
[10]

Volodymyr O. Kapustyan, Ivan O. Pyshnograiev, Olena A. Kapustian. Quasi-optimal control with a general quadratic criterion in a special norm for systems described by parabolic-hyperbolic equations with non-local boundary conditions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (3) : 1243-1258. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019014
[11]

Heather Finotti, Suzanne Lenhart, Tuoc Van Phan. Optimal control of advective direction in reaction-diffusion population models. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2012, 1 (1) : 81-107. doi: 10.3934/eect.2012.1.81
[12]

Urszula Ledzewicz, Stanislaw Walczak. Optimal control of systems governed by some elliptic equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 1999, 5 (2) : 279-290. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1999.5.279
[13]

Kyeong-Hun Kim, Kijung Lee. A weighted $L_p$-theory for second-order parabolic and elliptic partial differential systems on a half space. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2016, 15 (3) : 761-794. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2016.15.761
[14]

Nobuyuki Kato, Norio Kikuchi. Campanato-type boundary estimates for Rothe's scheme to parabolic partial differential systems with constant coefficients. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2007, 19 (4) : 737-760. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2007.19.737
[15]

Lucas Bonifacius, Ira Neitzel. Second order optimality conditions for optimal control of quasilinear parabolic equations. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2018, 8 (1) : 1-34. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2018001
[16]

Serge Nicaise, Fredi Tröltzsch. Optimal control of some quasilinear Maxwell equations of parabolic type. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2017, 10 (6) : 1375-1391. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2017073
[17]

Sébastien Court, Karl Kunisch, Laurent Pfeiffer. Hybrid optimal control problems for a class of semilinear parabolic equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 11 (6) : 1031-1060. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2018060
[18]

Alan E. Lindsay. An asymptotic study of blow up multiplicity in fourth order parabolic partial differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2014, 19 (1) : 189-215. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.189
[19]

Rafael Obaya, Ana M. Sanz. Persistence in non-autonomous quasimonotone parabolic partial functional differential equations with delay. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (8) : 3947-3970. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018338
[20]

Kun Li, Jianhua Huang, Xiong Li. Traveling wave solutions in advection hyperbolic-parabolic system with nonlocal delay. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (6) : 2091-2119. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018227

2018 Impact Factor: 1.008

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (72)
  • HTML views (58)
  • Cited by (0)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2020 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences