American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
  • Previous Article
    Impact of spatially heterogeneous temperature on the dynamics of dengue epidemics
  • DCDS-B Home
  • This Issue
  • Next Article
    A period doubling route to spatiotemporal chaos in a system of Ginzburg-Landau equations for nematic electroconvection
January  2019, 24(1): 297-319. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017144

Predicting and estimating probability density functions of chaotic systems

Noah H. Rhee 1, , PaweŁ Góra 2, and  Majid Bani-Yaghoub 1,

1. 

Dept. of mathematics & Statistics, University of Missouri-Kansas City, 5100 Rockhill Rd, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA
2. 

Dept. of Mathematics & Statistics, Concordia University, 1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd West, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3G 1M8

Received  November 2016 Revised  March 2017 Published  April 2017

Fund Project: The research of Prof. Paweł Góra was supported by NSERC grant. Also, the research of Profs. Noah Rhee and Majid Bani-Yaghoub was supported by UMKC's funding for excellence program.

In the present work, for the first time, we employ Ulam's method to estimate and to predict the existence of the probability density functions of single species populations with chaotic dynamics. In particular, given a chaotic map, we show that Ulam's method generates a sequence of density functions in L1-space that may converge weakly to a function in L1-space. In such a case we show that the limiting function generates an absolutely continuous (w.r.t. the Lebesgue measure) invariant measure (w.r.t. the given chaotic map) and therefore the limiting function is the probability density function of the chaotic map. This fact can be used to determine the existence and estimate the probability density functions of chaotic biological systems.

Keywords: Chaotic system, chaotic biological system, Birkhoff ergodic theorem, Frobenius-Perron operator, Ulam's method, invariant measure, absolutely continuous measure, weakly precompact.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 37A05; Secondary: 37A10, 37E05, 37M25, 92D25.
Citation: Noah H. Rhee, PaweŁ Góra, Majid Bani-Yaghoub. Predicting and estimating probability density functions of chaotic systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (1) : 297-319. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017144
References:
[1]

K. Alligood, T. Sauer and J. Yorke, Chaos: An Introduction to Dynamical Systems Springer-Verlag, New York, 1996. doi: 10. 1007/978-3-642-59281-2.  Google Scholar

[2]

M. Anazawa, Bottom-up derivation of discrete-time population models with the Allee effect, Theoretical Population Biology, 75 (2009), 56-67.  doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2008.11.001.  Google Scholar

[3]

L. Becks, F. M. Hilker, H. Malchow, K. Jürgens and H. Arndt, Experimental demonstration of chaos in a microbial food web, Nature, 435 (2005), 1226-1229.  doi: 10.1038/nature03627.  Google Scholar

[4]

A. Boyarskyand and P. Góra, Laws of Chaos Birkhauser, Boston, 1997. doi: 10. 1007/978-1-4612-2024-4.  Google Scholar

[5]

F. Brauer and C. Castillo-Chavez, Mathematical Models in Population Biology and Epidemiology Texts in Applied Mathematics, 2012. doi: 10. 1007/978-1-4614-1686-9.  Google Scholar

[6]

C. Castillo-Chavez and A. Yakubu, Epidemics on Attractors, Contemporary Mathematics, 284 (2001), 23-42.  doi: 10.1090/conm/284/04697.  Google Scholar

[7]

B. Cipra, Beetlemania: Chaos in ecology, in What's happening in the mathematical sciences 1998-1999 (ed. P. Zorn), Volume 4, American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, USA (1999), 72-81. Google Scholar

[8]

R. F. Costantino, R. A. Desharnais, J. M. Cushing and B. Dennis, Chaotic dynamics in an insect population, Science, 275 (1997), 389-391.  doi: 10.1126/science.275.5298.389.  Google Scholar

[9]

C. Dellacherie and P. A. Meyer, Probabilities and Potential, North-Holland Pub. Co. , N. Y. , 1978, (Chapter Ⅱ, Theorem T25). Google Scholar

[10]

B. Dennis, R. A. Desharnais, J. M. Cushing, S. M. Henson and R. F. Costantino, Estimating chaos and complex dynamics in an insect population, Ecological Monographs, 71 (2001), 277-303.   Google Scholar

[11]

R. A. Desharnais, R. F. Costantino, J. M. Cushing and B. Dennis, Estimating chaos in an insect population, Science, 276 (1997), 1881-1882.   Google Scholar

[12]

W. Falck, O. N. Bjornstad and N. C. Stenseth, Voles and lemmings: Chaos and uncertainty in fluctuating populations, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 262 (1995), 363-370.  doi: 10.1098/rspb.1995.0218.  Google Scholar

[13]

H. C. J. Godfray and S. P. Blythe, Complex dynamics in multispecies communities, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 330 (1990), 221-233.   Google Scholar

[14]

C. Godfray and M. Hassell, Chaotic beetles, Science, 275 (1997), 323-324.  doi: 10.1126/science.275.5298.323.  Google Scholar

[15]

I. Hanski, P. Turchin, E. Korpimaki and H. Henttonen, Population oscillations of boreal rodents: Regulation by mustelid predators leads to chaos, Nature, 364 (1993), 232-235.  doi: 10.1038/364232a0.  Google Scholar

[16]

M. P. Hassell, H. N. Comins and R. M. May, Spatial structure and chaos in insect population dynamics, Nature, 353 (1991), 255-258.  doi: 10.1038/353255a0.  Google Scholar

[17]

H. Henttonen and I. Hanski, Population dynamics of small rodents in northern Fennoscandia, in Chaos in real data: The analysis of non-linear dynamics from short ecological time series (ed. J. N. Perry, R. H. Smith, I. P. Woiwod and D. R. Morse), Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, (2000), 73-96. doi: 10. 1007/978-94-011-4010-2_4.  Google Scholar

[18]

M. V. Jakobson, Absolutely continuous invariant measures for one-parameter families of one-dimensional maps, Communications in Mathematical Physics, 81 (1981), 39-88.  doi: 10.1007/BF01941800.  Google Scholar

[19]

M. Jakobson, Piecewise smooth maps with absolutely continuous invariant measures and uniformly scaled Markov partitions, Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, 69 (2001), 825-881.  doi: 10.1090/pspum/069/1858558.  Google Scholar

[20]

P. Kareiva, Predicting and producing chaos, Nature, 375 (1995), 189-190.  doi: 10.1038/375189a0.  Google Scholar

[21]

G. Keller and T. Nowicki, Spectral theory, zeta functions and the distribution of periodic points for Collet-Eckmann maps, Communications in Mathematical Physics, 149 (1992), 31-69.  doi: 10.1007/BF02096623.  Google Scholar

[22]

B. E. Kendall, C. J. Briggs, W. W. Murdoch, P. Turchin, S. P. Ellner, E. McCauley, R. M. Nisbet and S. N. Wood, Why do populations cycle? A synthesis of statistical and mechanistic modeling approaches, Ecology, 80 (1999), 1789-1805.   Google Scholar

[23]

A. Lasota and M. C. Mackey, Chaos, Fractals, and Noise Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994, Chapter V, page 87. doi: 10. 1007/978-1-4612-4286-4.  Google Scholar

[24]

T. Y. Li, Finite approximation for the Frobenius-Perron operator, a solution to Ulam's conjecture, Journal of Approximation Theory, 17 (1976), 177-186.  doi: 10.1016/0021-9045(76)90037-X.  Google Scholar

[25]

J. A. Logan and F. P. Hain (eds. ), Chaos and Insect Ecology Virginia Experiment Station Information Series, 91-3, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA, 1991. Google Scholar

[26]

S. Luzzatto and H. Takahasi, Computable conditions for the occurrence of non-uniform hyperbolicity in families of one-dimensional maps, Nonlinearity, 19 (2006), 1657-1695.  doi: 10.1088/0951-7715/19/7/013.  Google Scholar

[27]

W. de Melo and S. van Strien, One-dimensional Dynamics in Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete Volume 3, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993, Chapter V, section 6. doi: 10. 1007/978-3-642-78043-1.  Google Scholar

[28]

M. Misiurewicz, Absolutely continuous measures for certain maps of an interval, Institute Hautes Etudes Sci. Publ. Math., 53 (1981), 17-51.   Google Scholar

[29]

R. M. Nisbet and W. S. C. Gurney, Modelling fluctuating populations, Wiley, 1982,285-308. Google Scholar

[30]

T. Nowicki, Some dynamical properties of S-unimodal maps, Fundamenta. Mathematicae, 142 (1993), 45-57.   Google Scholar

[31]

T. Nowicki and S. van Strien, Nonhyperbolicity and invariant measures for unimodal maps, Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor., 53 (1990), 427-429.   Google Scholar

[32]

L. Oksanen and T. Oksanen, Long-term microtine dynamics in north Fennoscandian tundra: The vole cycle and lemming chaos, Ecography, 15 (1992), 226-236.  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1992.tb00029.x.  Google Scholar

[33]

L. F. Olsen, G. L. Truty and W. M. Schaffer, Oscillations and chaos in epidemics: A nonlinear dynamic study of six childhood diseases in Copenhagen, Denmark, Theoretical Population Biology, 33 (1988), 344-370.  doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(88)90019-6.  Google Scholar

[34]

L. F. Olsen and W. M. Schaffer, Chaos vs. noisy periodicity: Alternative hypotheses for childhood epidemics, Science, 249 (1990), 499-504.   Google Scholar

[35]

E. Renshaw, Chaos in biometry, IMA Journal of Mathematics Applied in Medicine and Biology, 11 (1994), 17-44.  doi: 10.1093/imammb/11.1.17.  Google Scholar

[36]

P. Rohani and D. J. D. Earn, Chaos in a cup of flour Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12 (1997), p171. doi: 10. 1016/S0169-5347(97)01055-0.  Google Scholar

[37]

M. R. Rychlik, Another proof of Jakobson's theorem and related results, Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems, 8 (1988), 93-109.  doi: 10.1017/S014338570000434X.  Google Scholar

[38]

S. H. Strogatz, Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology and Chemistry, Perseus Publishing, 2001. Google Scholar

[39]

P. Turchin, Chaos and stability in rodent population dynamics: evidence from nonlinear time-series analysis, Oikos, 68 (1993), 167-172.  doi: 10.2307/3545323.  Google Scholar

[40]

P. Turchin, Chaos in microtine populations, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 262 (1995), 357-361.  doi: 10.1098/rspb.1995.0217.  Google Scholar

[41]

P. Turchin and S. P. Ellner, Living on the edge of chaos: Population dynamics of Fennoscandian voles, Ecology, 81 (2000), 3099-3116.   Google Scholar

[42]

S. M. Ulam, Problems in Modern Mathematics, Interscience, New York, 1964.  Google Scholar

[43]

S. N. Wood, Statistical inference for noisy nonlinear ecological dynamic systems, Nature, 466 (2010), 1102-1104.  doi: 10.1038/nature09319.  Google Scholar

[44]

J. -C. Yoccoz, A Proof of Jakobson's Theorem https://matheuscmss.wordpress.com/category/mathematics/expository/. Google Scholar

[45]

C. Zimmer, Life after chaos, Science, 284 (1999), 83-86.   Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

K. Alligood, T. Sauer and J. Yorke, Chaos: An Introduction to Dynamical Systems Springer-Verlag, New York, 1996. doi: 10. 1007/978-3-642-59281-2.  Google Scholar

[2]

M. Anazawa, Bottom-up derivation of discrete-time population models with the Allee effect, Theoretical Population Biology, 75 (2009), 56-67.  doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2008.11.001.  Google Scholar

[3]

L. Becks, F. M. Hilker, H. Malchow, K. Jürgens and H. Arndt, Experimental demonstration of chaos in a microbial food web, Nature, 435 (2005), 1226-1229.  doi: 10.1038/nature03627.  Google Scholar

[4]

A. Boyarskyand and P. Góra, Laws of Chaos Birkhauser, Boston, 1997. doi: 10. 1007/978-1-4612-2024-4.  Google Scholar

[5]

F. Brauer and C. Castillo-Chavez, Mathematical Models in Population Biology and Epidemiology Texts in Applied Mathematics, 2012. doi: 10. 1007/978-1-4614-1686-9.  Google Scholar

[6]

C. Castillo-Chavez and A. Yakubu, Epidemics on Attractors, Contemporary Mathematics, 284 (2001), 23-42.  doi: 10.1090/conm/284/04697.  Google Scholar

[7]

B. Cipra, Beetlemania: Chaos in ecology, in What's happening in the mathematical sciences 1998-1999 (ed. P. Zorn), Volume 4, American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, USA (1999), 72-81. Google Scholar

[8]

R. F. Costantino, R. A. Desharnais, J. M. Cushing and B. Dennis, Chaotic dynamics in an insect population, Science, 275 (1997), 389-391.  doi: 10.1126/science.275.5298.389.  Google Scholar

[9]

C. Dellacherie and P. A. Meyer, Probabilities and Potential, North-Holland Pub. Co. , N. Y. , 1978, (Chapter Ⅱ, Theorem T25). Google Scholar

[10]

B. Dennis, R. A. Desharnais, J. M. Cushing, S. M. Henson and R. F. Costantino, Estimating chaos and complex dynamics in an insect population, Ecological Monographs, 71 (2001), 277-303.   Google Scholar

[11]

R. A. Desharnais, R. F. Costantino, J. M. Cushing and B. Dennis, Estimating chaos in an insect population, Science, 276 (1997), 1881-1882.   Google Scholar

[12]

W. Falck, O. N. Bjornstad and N. C. Stenseth, Voles and lemmings: Chaos and uncertainty in fluctuating populations, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 262 (1995), 363-370.  doi: 10.1098/rspb.1995.0218.  Google Scholar

[13]

H. C. J. Godfray and S. P. Blythe, Complex dynamics in multispecies communities, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 330 (1990), 221-233.   Google Scholar

[14]

C. Godfray and M. Hassell, Chaotic beetles, Science, 275 (1997), 323-324.  doi: 10.1126/science.275.5298.323.  Google Scholar

[15]

I. Hanski, P. Turchin, E. Korpimaki and H. Henttonen, Population oscillations of boreal rodents: Regulation by mustelid predators leads to chaos, Nature, 364 (1993), 232-235.  doi: 10.1038/364232a0.  Google Scholar

[16]

M. P. Hassell, H. N. Comins and R. M. May, Spatial structure and chaos in insect population dynamics, Nature, 353 (1991), 255-258.  doi: 10.1038/353255a0.  Google Scholar

[17]

H. Henttonen and I. Hanski, Population dynamics of small rodents in northern Fennoscandia, in Chaos in real data: The analysis of non-linear dynamics from short ecological time series (ed. J. N. Perry, R. H. Smith, I. P. Woiwod and D. R. Morse), Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, (2000), 73-96. doi: 10. 1007/978-94-011-4010-2_4.  Google Scholar

[18]

M. V. Jakobson, Absolutely continuous invariant measures for one-parameter families of one-dimensional maps, Communications in Mathematical Physics, 81 (1981), 39-88.  doi: 10.1007/BF01941800.  Google Scholar

[19]

M. Jakobson, Piecewise smooth maps with absolutely continuous invariant measures and uniformly scaled Markov partitions, Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, 69 (2001), 825-881.  doi: 10.1090/pspum/069/1858558.  Google Scholar

[20]

P. Kareiva, Predicting and producing chaos, Nature, 375 (1995), 189-190.  doi: 10.1038/375189a0.  Google Scholar

[21]

G. Keller and T. Nowicki, Spectral theory, zeta functions and the distribution of periodic points for Collet-Eckmann maps, Communications in Mathematical Physics, 149 (1992), 31-69.  doi: 10.1007/BF02096623.  Google Scholar

[22]

B. E. Kendall, C. J. Briggs, W. W. Murdoch, P. Turchin, S. P. Ellner, E. McCauley, R. M. Nisbet and S. N. Wood, Why do populations cycle? A synthesis of statistical and mechanistic modeling approaches, Ecology, 80 (1999), 1789-1805.   Google Scholar

[23]

A. Lasota and M. C. Mackey, Chaos, Fractals, and Noise Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994, Chapter V, page 87. doi: 10. 1007/978-1-4612-4286-4.  Google Scholar

[24]

T. Y. Li, Finite approximation for the Frobenius-Perron operator, a solution to Ulam's conjecture, Journal of Approximation Theory, 17 (1976), 177-186.  doi: 10.1016/0021-9045(76)90037-X.  Google Scholar

[25]

J. A. Logan and F. P. Hain (eds. ), Chaos and Insect Ecology Virginia Experiment Station Information Series, 91-3, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA, 1991. Google Scholar

[26]

S. Luzzatto and H. Takahasi, Computable conditions for the occurrence of non-uniform hyperbolicity in families of one-dimensional maps, Nonlinearity, 19 (2006), 1657-1695.  doi: 10.1088/0951-7715/19/7/013.  Google Scholar

[27]

W. de Melo and S. van Strien, One-dimensional Dynamics in Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete Volume 3, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993, Chapter V, section 6. doi: 10. 1007/978-3-642-78043-1.  Google Scholar

[28]

M. Misiurewicz, Absolutely continuous measures for certain maps of an interval, Institute Hautes Etudes Sci. Publ. Math., 53 (1981), 17-51.   Google Scholar

[29]

R. M. Nisbet and W. S. C. Gurney, Modelling fluctuating populations, Wiley, 1982,285-308. Google Scholar

[30]

T. Nowicki, Some dynamical properties of S-unimodal maps, Fundamenta. Mathematicae, 142 (1993), 45-57.   Google Scholar

[31]

T. Nowicki and S. van Strien, Nonhyperbolicity and invariant measures for unimodal maps, Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor., 53 (1990), 427-429.   Google Scholar

[32]

L. Oksanen and T. Oksanen, Long-term microtine dynamics in north Fennoscandian tundra: The vole cycle and lemming chaos, Ecography, 15 (1992), 226-236.  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1992.tb00029.x.  Google Scholar

[33]

L. F. Olsen, G. L. Truty and W. M. Schaffer, Oscillations and chaos in epidemics: A nonlinear dynamic study of six childhood diseases in Copenhagen, Denmark, Theoretical Population Biology, 33 (1988), 344-370.  doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(88)90019-6.  Google Scholar

[34]

L. F. Olsen and W. M. Schaffer, Chaos vs. noisy periodicity: Alternative hypotheses for childhood epidemics, Science, 249 (1990), 499-504.   Google Scholar

[35]

E. Renshaw, Chaos in biometry, IMA Journal of Mathematics Applied in Medicine and Biology, 11 (1994), 17-44.  doi: 10.1093/imammb/11.1.17.  Google Scholar

[36]

P. Rohani and D. J. D. Earn, Chaos in a cup of flour Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12 (1997), p171. doi: 10. 1016/S0169-5347(97)01055-0.  Google Scholar

[37]

M. R. Rychlik, Another proof of Jakobson's theorem and related results, Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems, 8 (1988), 93-109.  doi: 10.1017/S014338570000434X.  Google Scholar

[38]

S. H. Strogatz, Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology and Chemistry, Perseus Publishing, 2001. Google Scholar

[39]

P. Turchin, Chaos and stability in rodent population dynamics: evidence from nonlinear time-series analysis, Oikos, 68 (1993), 167-172.  doi: 10.2307/3545323.  Google Scholar

[40]

P. Turchin, Chaos in microtine populations, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 262 (1995), 357-361.  doi: 10.1098/rspb.1995.0217.  Google Scholar

[41]

P. Turchin and S. P. Ellner, Living on the edge of chaos: Population dynamics of Fennoscandian voles, Ecology, 81 (2000), 3099-3116.   Google Scholar

[42]

S. M. Ulam, Problems in Modern Mathematics, Interscience, New York, 1964.  Google Scholar

[43]

S. N. Wood, Statistical inference for noisy nonlinear ecological dynamic systems, Nature, 466 (2010), 1102-1104.  doi: 10.1038/nature09319.  Google Scholar

[44]

J. -C. Yoccoz, A Proof of Jakobson's Theorem https://matheuscmss.wordpress.com/category/mathematics/expository/. Google Scholar

[45]

C. Zimmer, Life after chaos, Science, 284 (1999), 83-86.   Google Scholar

Figure 1.  Graphs of the probability density function $f^*$ and its estimation $f_{2^5}$ for Example 2. Since $\{ f_{2^n} \}_{n \ge 1}$ is bounded by 2, by Theorem 4 $\{ f_{2^n} \}_{n \ge 1}$ is weakly pre-compact, and hence there exists a subsequence $\{ f_{2^{n_k}} \}_{n \geq 1}$ of $\{ f_{2^n} \}_{n \geq 1}$ which converges weakly to $f^* \in L^1[a,b]$. In fact, we may expect that $\{ f_{2^n} \}_{n \ge 1}$ converges strongly to $f^*$.
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2.  Graphs of the probability density function $f^*$ and its estimation $f_{2^9}$ for Example 3. Again we may expect that $\{ f_{2^n} \}_{n \ge 1}$ converges strongly to $f^*$.
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3.  Bifurcation diagram of Smith-Slatkin map for $\alpha = 1.5, \beta = 1, \gamma = 0.1$, as $p$ changes from 5 to 19.
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4.  Graph of Smith-Slatkin map for $\alpha = 1.5, \beta = 1, \gamma = 0.1$ and $p=18$ with $x^*=0.977725973073732$, $x_c=0.857817481013884$, $b=\tau(x_c)=1.295956066342802$, and $a=\tau^2(x_c)=0.147708628629491$. Note that $\tau: [a,b] \rightarrow [a,b]$.
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 5.  Graph of $\frac{p^3-3p^2+5p-3}{6(p^2+1).}$ For $\alpha=1.5$ and $\gamma=0.1$, the condition $\frac\gamma\alpha < \frac{p^3-3p^2+5p-3}{6(p^2+1)}$ in Proposition 3 is fulfilled for all $p > 2.$
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 6.  Graph of Smith-Slatkin map for $\alpha = 1.5, \beta = 1, \gamma = 0.1$ and $p=8$. Three first iterates of the critical point are shown.
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 7.  Graph of Smith-Slatkin map for $\alpha = 1.5, \beta = 1, \gamma = 0.1$ and $p=8.5$. Three first iterates of the critical point are shown.
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 8.  Graph of $f_{2^8}$ for Example 5. There are six peak values, where the first peak value occurs at $x=a$ and the last peak value at $x=b$. Although the closed form of the probability density function $f^*$ is unknown, the numerical simulations strongly show that $\{ f_{2^n} \}_{n \geq 1}$ is bounded by an integrable function. So, by Theorem 4, $\{ f_{2^n} \}_{n \ge 1}$ is weakly pre-compact, and hence there exists a sub-sequence $\{ f_{2^{n_k}} \}_{n \geq 1}$ of $\{ f_{2^n} \}_{n \geq 1}$ which converges weakly to $f^* \in L^1[a,b]$. By Proposition 2 the measure $\mu$ with density function $f^*$ is an absolutely continuous $\tau$-invariant measure. So $f^*$ is the PDF of the chaotic map $\tau$. In fact, we may expect that $\{ f_{2^n} \}_{n \geq 1}$ converges strongly to $f^*$.
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Table 1.  Maximum values of $f_{2^n}$
$n$ $2^n$ maximum values of$f_{2^n}$
$1$ $2$ $1.25$
$2$ $4$ $1.5075$
$3$ $8$ $1.7232$
$4$ $16$ $1.8157$
$5$ $32$ $1.9126$
$6$ $64$ $1.9465$
$7$ $128$ $1.9748$
$8$ $256$ $1.9871$
$9$ $512$ $1.9930$
$10$ $1024$ $1.9964$
Table Options

Download as excel

$n$ $2^n$ maximum values of$f_{2^n}$
$1$ $2$ $1.25$
$2$ $4$ $1.5075$
$3$ $8$ $1.7232$
$4$ $16$ $1.8157$
$5$ $32$ $1.9126$
$6$ $64$ $1.9465$
$7$ $128$ $1.9748$
$8$ $256$ $1.9871$
$9$ $512$ $1.9930$
$10$ $1024$ $1.9964$
Table 2.  Peak values of $f_{2^n}$ for $\tau$ in Example 3
$n$ $2^n$ 1st peak value of $f_{2^n}$ 2nd peak value of $f_{2^n}$
$5$ $32$ $1.2899$ $3.8291$
$6$ $64$ $1.8337$ $5.4724$
$7$ $128$ $2.4475$ $7.3235$
$8$ $256$ $3.5149$ $10.5309$
$9$ $512$ $4.8498$ $14.5401$
$10$ $1024$ $6.9200$ $20.7534$
Table Options

Download as excel

$n$ $2^n$ 1st peak value of $f_{2^n}$ 2nd peak value of $f_{2^n}$
$5$ $32$ $1.2899$ $3.8291$
$6$ $64$ $1.8337$ $5.4724$
$7$ $128$ $2.4475$ $7.3235$
$8$ $256$ $3.5149$ $10.5309$
$9$ $512$ $4.8498$ $14.5401$
$10$ $1024$ $6.9200$ $20.7534$
Table 3.  The consecutive ratio of peak values of $f_{2^n}$ in Example 3
$n$ $2^n$ $f_{2^n}/{f_{2^{n-1}}}$ at 1st peak value $f_{2^n}/{f_{2^{n-1}}}$ at 2nd peak value
$6$ $64$ $1.4216$ $1.4292$
$7$ $128$ $1.3347$ $1.3382$
$8$ $256$ $1.4361$ $1.4380$
$9$ $512$ $1.3798$ $1.3807$
$10$ $1024$ $1.4269$ $1.4273$
Table Options

Download as excel

$n$ $2^n$ $f_{2^n}/{f_{2^{n-1}}}$ at 1st peak value $f_{2^n}/{f_{2^{n-1}}}$ at 2nd peak value
$6$ $64$ $1.4216$ $1.4292$
$7$ $128$ $1.3347$ $1.3382$
$8$ $256$ $1.4361$ $1.4380$
$9$ $512$ $1.3798$ $1.3807$
$10$ $1024$ $1.4269$ $1.4273$
Table 4.  Peak values of $f_{2^n}$ for $\tau$ in Example 5
$n$ $2^n$ The 1st peak values The 2nd peak values
$8$ $256$ $9.9001$ $6.5190$
$9$ $512$ $13.987$ $9.0862$
$10$ $1024$ $20.609$ $12.770$
$11$ $2048$ $28.397$ $16.860$
Table Options

Download as excel

$n$ $2^n$ The 1st peak values The 2nd peak values
$8$ $256$ $9.9001$ $6.5190$
$9$ $512$ $13.987$ $9.0862$
$10$ $1024$ $20.609$ $12.770$
$11$ $2048$ $28.397$ $16.860$
Table 5.  Peak values of $f_{2^n}$ for $\tau$ in Example 5
$n$ $2^n$ The 3rd peak values The 4th peak values
$8$ $256$ $4.2530$ $2.7992$
$9$ $512$ $5.8493$ $3.8154$
$10$ $1024$ $8.1477$ $5.2147$
$11$ $2048$ $10.711$ $6.8142$
Table Options

Download as excel

$n$ $2^n$ The 3rd peak values The 4th peak values
$8$ $256$ $4.2530$ $2.7992$
$9$ $512$ $5.8493$ $3.8154$
$10$ $1024$ $8.1477$ $5.2147$
$11$ $2048$ $10.711$ $6.8142$
Table 6.  Peak values of $f_{2^n}$ for $\tau$ in Example 5
$n$ $2^n$ The 5th peak values The 6th peak values
$8$ $256$ $2.0871$ $4.1312$
$9$ $512$ $2.8524$ $5.5220$
$10$ $1024$ $3.5875$ $7.8931$
$11$ $2048$ $4.5694$ $10.607$
Table Options

Download as excel

$n$ $2^n$ The 5th peak values The 6th peak values
$8$ $256$ $2.0871$ $4.1312$
$9$ $512$ $2.8524$ $5.5220$
$10$ $1024$ $3.5875$ $7.8931$
$11$ $2048$ $4.5694$ $10.607$
Table 7.  The consecutive ratio of the first two peak values of $f_{2^n}$ for $\tau$ in Example 5
$n$ $2^n$ $f_{2^n}/{f_{2^{n-1}}}$ at 1st peak value $f_{2^n}/{f_{2^{n-1}}}$ at 2nd peak value
$9$ $512$ $1.4128$ $1.3938$
$10$ $1024$ $1.4735$ $1.4055$
$11$ $2048$ $1.3779$ $1.3203$
Table Options

Download as excel

$n$ $2^n$ $f_{2^n}/{f_{2^{n-1}}}$ at 1st peak value $f_{2^n}/{f_{2^{n-1}}}$ at 2nd peak value
$9$ $512$ $1.4128$ $1.3938$
$10$ $1024$ $1.4735$ $1.4055$
$11$ $2048$ $1.3779$ $1.3203$
Table 8.  The consecutive ratio of the middle two peak values of $f_{2^n}$ for $\tau$ in Example 5
$n$ $2^n$ $f_{2^n}/{f_{2^{n-1}}}$ at 3rd peak value $f_{2^n}/{f_{2^{n-1}}}$ at 4th peak value
$9$ $512$ $1.3753$ $1.3630$
$10$ $1024$ $1.3929$ $1.3668$
$11$ $2048$ $1.3146$ $1.3067$
Table Options

Download as excel

$n$ $2^n$ $f_{2^n}/{f_{2^{n-1}}}$ at 3rd peak value $f_{2^n}/{f_{2^{n-1}}}$ at 4th peak value
$9$ $512$ $1.3753$ $1.3630$
$10$ $1024$ $1.3929$ $1.3668$
$11$ $2048$ $1.3146$ $1.3067$
Table 9.  The consecutive ratio of the last two peak values of $f_{2^n}$ for $\tau$ in Example 5
$n$ $2^n$ $f_{2^n}/{f_{2^{n-1}}}$ at 5th peak value $f_{2^n}/{f_{2^{n-1}}}$ at 6th peak value
$9$ $512$ $1.3667$ $1.3367$
$10$ $1024$ $1.2577$ $1.4294$
$11$ $2048$ $1.2737$ $1.3439$
Table Options

Download as excel

$n$ $2^n$ $f_{2^n}/{f_{2^{n-1}}}$ at 5th peak value $f_{2^n}/{f_{2^{n-1}}}$ at 6th peak value
$9$ $512$ $1.3667$ $1.3367$
$10$ $1024$ $1.2577$ $1.4294$
$11$ $2048$ $1.2737$ $1.3439$
Table 10.  The estimates of ${\bar X}$ and $\sigma$ for Example 5
$N$ ${\bar x}$ s
$10^5$ $0.6658$ $0.3570$
$10^6$ $0.6657$ $0.3574$
$10^7$ $0.6657$ $0.3575$
Table Options

Download as excel

$N$ ${\bar x}$ s
$10^5$ $0.6658$ $0.3570$
$10^6$ $0.6657$ $0.3574$
$10^7$ $0.6657$ $0.3575$
[1]

Jawad Al-Khal, Henk Bruin, Michael Jakobson. New examples of S-unimodal maps with a sigma-finite absolutely continuous invariant measure. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2008, 22 (1&2) : 35-61. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2008.22.35
[2]

Simon Lloyd, Edson Vargas. Critical covering maps without absolutely continuous invariant probability measure. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2019, 39 (5) : 2393-2412. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019101
[3]

Antonio Giorgilli, Simone Paleari, Tiziano Penati. Local chaotic behaviour in the Fermi-Pasta-Ulam system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2005, 5 (4) : 991-1004. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2005.5.991
[4]

Jiu Ding, Noah H. Rhee. A unified maximum entropy method via spline functions for Frobenius-Perron operators. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2013, 3 (2) : 235-245. doi: 10.3934/naco.2013.3.235
[5]

Fanni M. Sélley. A self-consistent dynamical system with multiple absolutely continuous invariant measures. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2021, 8 (1) : 9-32. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2021002
[6]

Stefan Klus, Péter Koltai, Christof Schütte. On the numerical approximation of the Perron-Frobenius and Koopman operator. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2016, 3 (1) : 51-79. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2016003
[7]

Gábor Domokos, Domokos Szász. Ulam's scheme revisited: digital modeling of chaotic attractors via micro-perturbations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2003, 9 (4) : 859-876. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2003.9.859
[8]

Ruwu Xiao, Geng Li, Yuping Zhao. On the design of full duplex wireless system with chaotic sequences. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2019, 12 (4&5) : 783-793. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2019052
[9]

Jie Li. How chaotic is an almost mean equicontinuous system?. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2018, 38 (9) : 4727-4744. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018208
[10]

Marcos C. Mota, Regilene D. S. Oliveira. Dynamic aspects of Sprott BC chaotic system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (3) : 1653-1673. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020177
[11]

Oliver Jenkinson. Every ergodic measure is uniquely maximizing. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2006, 16 (2) : 383-392. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.16.383
[12]

Stefano Galatolo. Global and local complexity in weakly chaotic dynamical systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2003, 9 (6) : 1607-1624. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2003.9.1607
[13]

Riadh Chteoui, Abdulrahman F. Aljohani, Anouar Ben Mabrouk. Classification and simulation of chaotic behaviour of the solutions of a mixed nonlinear Schrödinger system. Electronic Research Archive, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/era.2021002
[14]

Stefan Klus, Christof Schütte. Towards tensor-based methods for the numerical approximation of the Perron--Frobenius and Koopman operator. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2016, 3 (2) : 139-161. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2016007
[15]

Todd Young. Asymptotic measures and distributions of Birkhoff averages with respect to Lebesgue measure. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2003, 9 (2) : 359-378. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2003.9.359
[16]

Marc Kesseböhmer, Sabrina Kombrink. A complex Ruelle-Perron-Frobenius theorem for infinite Markov shifts with applications to renewal theory. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2017, 10 (2) : 335-352. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2017016
[17]

José Antonio Carrillo, Marco Di Francesco, Antonio Esposito, Simone Fagioli, Markus Schmidtchen. Measure solutions to a system of continuity equations driven by Newtonian nonlocal interactions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2020, 40 (2) : 1191-1231. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020075
[18]

Pengyan Wang, Pengcheng Niu. Liouville's theorem for a fractional elliptic system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2019, 39 (3) : 1545-1558. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019067
[19]

Jacques Féjoz. On "Arnold's theorem" on the stability of the solar system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2013, 33 (8) : 3555-3565. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.3555
[20]

Christopher Bose, Rua Murray. The exact rate of approximation in Ulam's method. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2001, 7 (1) : 219-235. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2001.7.219

2019 Impact Factor: 1.27

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (234)
  • HTML views (992)
  • Cited by (0)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2021 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences