American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
March  2019, 24(3): 1115-1142. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019009

Inertial manifolds for the hyperbolic relaxation of semilinear parabolic equations

Vladimir V. Chepyzhov 1,2,, , Anna Kostianko 3, and  Sergey Zelik 3,

1. 

Institute for Information Transmission Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences, Bolshoy Karetniy 19, Moscow 127051, Russian Federation
2. 

Voronezh State University, Universitetskaya sq. 1, Voronezh 394018, Russian Federation
3. 

University of Surrey, Department of Mathematics, Guildford, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom

* Corresponding author: V. V. Chepyzhov

To the blessed memory of Professor V. S. Melnik

Received  September 2017 Revised  March 2018 Published  March 2019 Early access  January 2019

Fund Project: The research of VVC was supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (grant 14.Z50.31.0037). The work of AK and SZ was partially supported by the EPSRC grant EP/P024920/1 and the work of SZ was partially supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (projects 17-01-00515 and 18-01-00524).

The paper gives a comprehensive study of Inertial Manifolds for hyperbolic relaxations of an abstract semilinear parabolic equation in a Hilbert space. A new scheme of constructing Inertial Manifolds for such type of problems is suggested and optimal spectral gap conditions which guarantee their existence are established. Moreover, the dependence of the constructed manifolds on the relaxation parameter in the case of the parabolic singular limit is also studied.

Bibliography: 38 titles.

Keywords: Hyperbolic relaxation, gap property, inertial manifold.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 35B40, 35B45.
Citation: Vladimir V. Chepyzhov, Anna Kostianko, Sergey Zelik. Inertial manifolds for the hyperbolic relaxation of semilinear parabolic equations. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (3) : 1115-1142. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019009
References:
[1]

A. V. Babin and M. I. Vishik, Attractors of Evolution Equations, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1992.

[2]

N. A. Chalkina, Sufficient condition for the existence of an inertial manifold for a hyperbolic equation with weak and strong dissipation, Russ. J. Math. Phys., 19 (2012), 11-20.  doi: 10.1134/S1061920812010025.

[3]

V. V. Chepyzhov and M. I. Vishik, Attractors for Equations of Mathematical Physics, American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, 49. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2002.

[4]

V. V. Chepyzhov, A. Yu. Goritsky and M. I. Vishik, Integral manifolds and attractors with exponential rate for nonautonomous hyperbolic equations with dissipation, Russ. J. Math. Phys., 12 (2005), 17-39. 

[5]

V. V. Chepyzhov and A. Yu. Goritsky, Global integral manifolds with exponential tracking for nonautonomous equations, Russ. J. Math. Phys., 5 (1997), 9-28. 

[6]

V. V. Chepyzhov and A. Yu. Goritsky, The dichotomy property of solutions of quasilinear equations in problems on inertial manifolds, Sb. Math., 196 (2005), 23-50.  doi: 10.1070/SM2005v196n04ABEH000889.

[7]

A. Eden, S. V. Zelik and V. K. Kalantarov, Counterexamples to the regularity of Mané projections in the attractors theory, Russian Math. Surveys, 68 (2013), 199-226.  doi: 10.1070/rm2013v068n02abeh004828.

[8]

K.-J. Engel and R. Nagel, One-Parameter Semigroups for Linear Evolution Equations, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000.

[9]

P. Fabrie, C. Galushinski, A. Miranville and S. Zelik, Uniform exponential attractors for a singularly perturbed damped wave equation, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 10 (2004), 211-238.  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2004.10.211.

[10]

N. Fenichel, Persistence and smoothness of invariant manifolds for flows, Indiana Univ. Math. J., 21 (1971/1972), 193-226.  doi: 10.1512/iumj.1972.21.21017.

[11]

C. Foias, G. Sell and R. Temam, Inertial manifolds for nonlinear evolutionary equations, J. Differential Equations, 73 (1988), 309-353.  doi: 10.1016/0022-0396(88)90110-6.

[12]

D. Henry, Geometric Theory of Semilinear Parabolic Equations, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 840. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, New York, 1981.

[13]

M. Hirsch, C. Pugh and M. Shub, Invariant Manifolds, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 583. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, New York, 1977.

[14]

V. Kalantarov, A. Savstianov and S. Zelik, Attractors for Damped Quintic Wave Equations in Bounded Domains, Annales Henri Poincaré, 17 (2016), 2555-2584.  doi: 10.1007/s00023-016-0480-y.

[15]

N. Koksch, Almost sharp conditions for the existence of smooth inertial manifolds, in: Equadiff 9: Conference on Differential Equations and their Applications : Proceedings, edited by Z. Dosla, J. Kuben, J. Vosmansky, Masaryk University, Brno, 1998,139–166.

[16]

A. Kostianko and S. Zelik, Inertial manifolds for 1D reaction-diffusion-advection systems. Part Ⅰ: Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal., 16 (2017), 2357-2376.  doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2017116.

[17]

A. Kostianko and S. Zelik, Inertial manifolds for 1D reaction-diffusion-advection systems. Part Ⅱ: Periodic bundary conditins, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal., 17 (2018), 285-317.  doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2018017.

[18]

A. Kostianko and S. Zelik, Spatio-Temporal Averaging and Inertial Manifolds for 3D complex Ginzburg-Landau equations with periodic boundary conditions, in preparation.

[19]

A. Kostianko and S. Zelik, Inertial manifolds for the 3D Cahn-Hilliard equations with periodic boundary conditions, Comm. Pure Appl. Anal., 14 (2015), 2069-2094.  doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2015.14.2069.

[20]

A. Kostianko and S. Zelik, The Kwak transform and Inertial Manifolds Revisited, in preparation.

[21]

M. Kwak, Finite-dimensional inertial forms for 2D Navier-Stokes equations, Indiana Univ. Math. J., 41 (1992), 927-981.  doi: 10.1512/iumj.1992.41.41051.

[22]

J. Mallet-Paret and G. Sell, Inertial manifolds for reaction-diffusion equations in higher space dimensions, J. Amer. Math. Soc., 1 (1988), 805-866.  doi: 10.1090/S0894-0347-1988-0943276-7.

[23]

J. Mallet-Paret, G. Sell and Z. Shao, Obstructions to the existence of normally hyperbolic inertial manifolds, Indiana Univ. Math. J., 42 (1993), 1027-1055.  doi: 10.1512/iumj.1993.42.42048.

[24]

M. Miklavcic, A sharp condition for existence of an inertial manifold, J. Dynam.Differential Equations, 3 (1991), 437-456.  doi: 10.1007/BF01049741.

[25]

A. Miranville and S. Zelik, Attractors for dissipative partial differential equations in bounded and unbounded domains, In: Handbook of Differential Equations: Evolutionary Equations. Vol. Ⅳ, 103–200, Handb. Differ. Equ., Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2008. doi: 10.1016/S1874-5717(08)00003-0.

[26]

X. Mora and J. Solá-Morales, Existence and nonexistence of finite-dimensional globally attracting invariant manifolds in semilinear damped wave equations, in: Dynamics of Infinite-Dimensional Systems (Lisbon, 1986), 187–210, NATO Adv. Sci. Inst. Ser. F Comput. Systems Sci., 37, Springer, Berlin, 1987.

[27]

X. Mora and J. Solá-Morales, Inertial manifolds of damped semilinear wave equations. Attractors, inertial manifolds and their approximation, in: (Marseille-Luminy, 1987). RAIRO Model. Math. Anal. Numer., 23 (1989), 489–505. doi: 10.1051/m2an/1989230304891.

[28]

J. Robinson, Infinite-dimensional Dynamical Systems. An Introduction to Dissipative Parabolic PDEs and the Theory of Global Attractors, Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001. doi: 10.1007/978-94-010-0732-0.

[29]

J. Robinson, Dimensions, Embeddings, and Attractors, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, 186. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011.

[30]

A. Romanov, Sharp estimates for the dimension of inertial manifolds for nonlinear parabolic equations, Russian Acad. Sci. Izv. Math., 43 (1994), 31-47.  doi: 10.1070/IM1994v043n01ABEH001557.

[31]

A. Romanov, Three counterexamples in the theory of inertial manifolds, Math. Notes, 68 (2000), 378-385.  doi: 10.1007/BF02674562.

[32]

R. Rosa and R. Temam, Inertial manifolds and normal hyperbolicity, Acta Appl. Math., 45 (1996), 1-50.  doi: 10.1007/BF00047882.

[33]

R. Temam, Infinite-dimensional Dynamical Systems in Mechanics and Physics, Second edition, Applied Mathematical Sciences, 68. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-0645-3.

[34]

R. Temam and S. Wang, Inertial forms of Navier-Stokes equations on the sphere, J. Funct. Anal., 117 (1993), 215-242.  doi: 10.1006/jfan.1993.1126.

[35]

A. Yu. Goritskii and N. A. Chalkina, Inertial manifolds for weakly and strongly dissipative hyperbolic equations, J. Math. Sci., 197 (2014), 291-302.  doi: 10.1007/s10958-014-1715-4.

[36]

S. Zelik, Inertial manifolds and finite-dimensional reduction for dissipative PDEs, Proc. Royal Soc. Edinburgh, 144A (2014), 1245-1327.  doi: 10.1017/S0308210513000073.

[37]

S. Zelik, Asymptotic Regularity of Solutions of Singularly Perturbed Damped Wave Equations with Supercritical Nonlinearities, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 11 (2004), 351-392.  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2004.11.351.

[38]

M. Z. Zgurovsky, P. O. Kasyanov, O. V. Kapustyan, J. Valero and J. V. Zadoianchuk, Evolution Inclusions and Variation Inequalities for Earth Data Processing Ⅲ. Long-Time Behavior of Evolution Inclusions Solutions in Earth Data Analysis, Series: Advances in Mechanics and Mathematics, 27, Springer, Berlin, 2012. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-28512-7.

show all references

References:
[1]

A. V. Babin and M. I. Vishik, Attractors of Evolution Equations, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1992.

[2]

N. A. Chalkina, Sufficient condition for the existence of an inertial manifold for a hyperbolic equation with weak and strong dissipation, Russ. J. Math. Phys., 19 (2012), 11-20.  doi: 10.1134/S1061920812010025.

[3]

V. V. Chepyzhov and M. I. Vishik, Attractors for Equations of Mathematical Physics, American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, 49. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2002.

[4]

V. V. Chepyzhov, A. Yu. Goritsky and M. I. Vishik, Integral manifolds and attractors with exponential rate for nonautonomous hyperbolic equations with dissipation, Russ. J. Math. Phys., 12 (2005), 17-39. 

[5]

V. V. Chepyzhov and A. Yu. Goritsky, Global integral manifolds with exponential tracking for nonautonomous equations, Russ. J. Math. Phys., 5 (1997), 9-28. 

[6]

V. V. Chepyzhov and A. Yu. Goritsky, The dichotomy property of solutions of quasilinear equations in problems on inertial manifolds, Sb. Math., 196 (2005), 23-50.  doi: 10.1070/SM2005v196n04ABEH000889.

[7]

A. Eden, S. V. Zelik and V. K. Kalantarov, Counterexamples to the regularity of Mané projections in the attractors theory, Russian Math. Surveys, 68 (2013), 199-226.  doi: 10.1070/rm2013v068n02abeh004828.

[8]

K.-J. Engel and R. Nagel, One-Parameter Semigroups for Linear Evolution Equations, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000.

[9]

P. Fabrie, C. Galushinski, A. Miranville and S. Zelik, Uniform exponential attractors for a singularly perturbed damped wave equation, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 10 (2004), 211-238.  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2004.10.211.

[10]

N. Fenichel, Persistence and smoothness of invariant manifolds for flows, Indiana Univ. Math. J., 21 (1971/1972), 193-226.  doi: 10.1512/iumj.1972.21.21017.

[11]

C. Foias, G. Sell and R. Temam, Inertial manifolds for nonlinear evolutionary equations, J. Differential Equations, 73 (1988), 309-353.  doi: 10.1016/0022-0396(88)90110-6.

[12]

D. Henry, Geometric Theory of Semilinear Parabolic Equations, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 840. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, New York, 1981.

[13]

M. Hirsch, C. Pugh and M. Shub, Invariant Manifolds, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 583. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, New York, 1977.

[14]

V. Kalantarov, A. Savstianov and S. Zelik, Attractors for Damped Quintic Wave Equations in Bounded Domains, Annales Henri Poincaré, 17 (2016), 2555-2584.  doi: 10.1007/s00023-016-0480-y.

[15]

N. Koksch, Almost sharp conditions for the existence of smooth inertial manifolds, in: Equadiff 9: Conference on Differential Equations and their Applications : Proceedings, edited by Z. Dosla, J. Kuben, J. Vosmansky, Masaryk University, Brno, 1998,139–166.

[16]

A. Kostianko and S. Zelik, Inertial manifolds for 1D reaction-diffusion-advection systems. Part Ⅰ: Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal., 16 (2017), 2357-2376.  doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2017116.

[17]

A. Kostianko and S. Zelik, Inertial manifolds for 1D reaction-diffusion-advection systems. Part Ⅱ: Periodic bundary conditins, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal., 17 (2018), 285-317.  doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2018017.

[18]

A. Kostianko and S. Zelik, Spatio-Temporal Averaging and Inertial Manifolds for 3D complex Ginzburg-Landau equations with periodic boundary conditions, in preparation.

[19]

A. Kostianko and S. Zelik, Inertial manifolds for the 3D Cahn-Hilliard equations with periodic boundary conditions, Comm. Pure Appl. Anal., 14 (2015), 2069-2094.  doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2015.14.2069.

[20]

A. Kostianko and S. Zelik, The Kwak transform and Inertial Manifolds Revisited, in preparation.

[21]

M. Kwak, Finite-dimensional inertial forms for 2D Navier-Stokes equations, Indiana Univ. Math. J., 41 (1992), 927-981.  doi: 10.1512/iumj.1992.41.41051.

[22]

J. Mallet-Paret and G. Sell, Inertial manifolds for reaction-diffusion equations in higher space dimensions, J. Amer. Math. Soc., 1 (1988), 805-866.  doi: 10.1090/S0894-0347-1988-0943276-7.

[23]

J. Mallet-Paret, G. Sell and Z. Shao, Obstructions to the existence of normally hyperbolic inertial manifolds, Indiana Univ. Math. J., 42 (1993), 1027-1055.  doi: 10.1512/iumj.1993.42.42048.

[24]

M. Miklavcic, A sharp condition for existence of an inertial manifold, J. Dynam.Differential Equations, 3 (1991), 437-456.  doi: 10.1007/BF01049741.

[25]

A. Miranville and S. Zelik, Attractors for dissipative partial differential equations in bounded and unbounded domains, In: Handbook of Differential Equations: Evolutionary Equations. Vol. Ⅳ, 103–200, Handb. Differ. Equ., Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2008. doi: 10.1016/S1874-5717(08)00003-0.

[26]

X. Mora and J. Solá-Morales, Existence and nonexistence of finite-dimensional globally attracting invariant manifolds in semilinear damped wave equations, in: Dynamics of Infinite-Dimensional Systems (Lisbon, 1986), 187–210, NATO Adv. Sci. Inst. Ser. F Comput. Systems Sci., 37, Springer, Berlin, 1987.

[27]

X. Mora and J. Solá-Morales, Inertial manifolds of damped semilinear wave equations. Attractors, inertial manifolds and their approximation, in: (Marseille-Luminy, 1987). RAIRO Model. Math. Anal. Numer., 23 (1989), 489–505. doi: 10.1051/m2an/1989230304891.

[28]

J. Robinson, Infinite-dimensional Dynamical Systems. An Introduction to Dissipative Parabolic PDEs and the Theory of Global Attractors, Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001. doi: 10.1007/978-94-010-0732-0.

[29]

J. Robinson, Dimensions, Embeddings, and Attractors, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, 186. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011.

[30]

A. Romanov, Sharp estimates for the dimension of inertial manifolds for nonlinear parabolic equations, Russian Acad. Sci. Izv. Math., 43 (1994), 31-47.  doi: 10.1070/IM1994v043n01ABEH001557.

[31]

A. Romanov, Three counterexamples in the theory of inertial manifolds, Math. Notes, 68 (2000), 378-385.  doi: 10.1007/BF02674562.

[32]

R. Rosa and R. Temam, Inertial manifolds and normal hyperbolicity, Acta Appl. Math., 45 (1996), 1-50.  doi: 10.1007/BF00047882.

[33]

R. Temam, Infinite-dimensional Dynamical Systems in Mechanics and Physics, Second edition, Applied Mathematical Sciences, 68. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-0645-3.

[34]

R. Temam and S. Wang, Inertial forms of Navier-Stokes equations on the sphere, J. Funct. Anal., 117 (1993), 215-242.  doi: 10.1006/jfan.1993.1126.

[35]

A. Yu. Goritskii and N. A. Chalkina, Inertial manifolds for weakly and strongly dissipative hyperbolic equations, J. Math. Sci., 197 (2014), 291-302.  doi: 10.1007/s10958-014-1715-4.

[36]

S. Zelik, Inertial manifolds and finite-dimensional reduction for dissipative PDEs, Proc. Royal Soc. Edinburgh, 144A (2014), 1245-1327.  doi: 10.1017/S0308210513000073.

[37]

S. Zelik, Asymptotic Regularity of Solutions of Singularly Perturbed Damped Wave Equations with Supercritical Nonlinearities, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 11 (2004), 351-392.  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2004.11.351.

[38]

M. Z. Zgurovsky, P. O. Kasyanov, O. V. Kapustyan, J. Valero and J. V. Zadoianchuk, Evolution Inclusions and Variation Inequalities for Earth Data Processing Ⅲ. Long-Time Behavior of Evolution Inclusions Solutions in Earth Data Analysis, Series: Advances in Mechanics and Mathematics, 27, Springer, Berlin, 2012. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-28512-7.

[1]

Constantine M. Dafermos. Hyperbolic balance laws with relaxation. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2016, 36 (8) : 4271-4285. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016.36.4271
[2]

Rafael Potrie. Partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms with a trapping property. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2015, 35 (10) : 5037-5054. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.5037
[3]

Alfonso C. Casal, Jesús Ildefonso Díaz, José M. Vegas. Finite extinction time property for a delayed linear problem on a manifold without boundary. Conference Publications, 2011, 2011 (Special) : 265-271. doi: 10.3934/proc.2011.2011.265
[4]

Manas Bhatnagar, Hailiang Liu. Sharp critical thresholds in a hyperbolic system with relaxation. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021, 41 (12) : 5851-5869. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2021098
[5]

A. Pankov. Gap solitons in periodic discrete nonlinear Schrödinger equations II: A generalized Nehari manifold approach. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2007, 19 (2) : 419-430. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2007.19.419
[6]

Andrei Török. Rigidity of partially hyperbolic actions of property (T) groups. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2003, 9 (1) : 193-208. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2003.9.193
[7]

Lin Wang, Yujun Zhu. Center specification property and entropy for partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2016, 36 (1) : 469-479. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016.36.469
[8]

Wen-Qing Xu. Boundary conditions for multi-dimensional hyperbolic relaxation problems. Conference Publications, 2003, 2003 (Special) : 916-925. doi: 10.3934/proc.2003.2003.916
[9]

Ali Unver, Christian Ringhofer, Dieter Armbruster. A hyperbolic relaxation model for product flow in complex production networks. Conference Publications, 2009, 2009 (Special) : 790-799. doi: 10.3934/proc.2009.2009.790
[10]

Christian Rohde, Wenjun Wang, Feng Xie. Hyperbolic-hyperbolic relaxation limit for a 1D compressible radiation hydrodynamics model: superposition of rarefaction and contact waves. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2013, 12 (5) : 2145-2171. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2013.12.2145
[11]

Marian Gidea, Rafael de la Llave, Tere M. Seara. A general mechanism of instability in Hamiltonian systems: Skipping along a normally hyperbolic invariant manifold. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2020, 40 (12) : 6795-6813. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020166
[12]

Priyanjana M. N. Dharmawardane. Decay property of regularity-loss type for quasi-linear hyperbolic systems of viscoelasticity. Conference Publications, 2013, 2013 (special) : 197-206. doi: 10.3934/proc.2013.2013.197
[13]

E. Camouzis, H. Kollias, I. Leventides. Stable manifold market sequences. Journal of Dynamics and Games, 2018, 5 (2) : 165-185. doi: 10.3934/jdg.2018010
[14]

Camillo De Lellis, Emanuele Spadaro. Center manifold: A case study. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2011, 31 (4) : 1249-1272. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.31.1249
[15]

Zhiguo Feng, Ka-Fai Cedric Yiu. Manifold relaxations for integer programming. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2014, 10 (2) : 557-566. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2014.10.557
[16]

James C. Robinson. Computing inertial manifolds. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2002, 8 (4) : 815-833. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2002.8.815
[17]

José M. Arrieta, Esperanza Santamaría. Estimates on the distance of inertial manifolds. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2014, 34 (10) : 3921-3944. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.3921
[18]

James C. Robinson. Inertial manifolds with and without delay. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1999, 5 (4) : 813-824. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1999.5.813
[19]

Y. Latushkin, B. Layton. The optimal gap condition for invariant manifolds. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1999, 5 (2) : 233-268. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1999.5.233
[20]

Franz W. Kamber and Peter W. Michor. The flow completion of a manifold with vector field. Electronic Research Announcements, 2000, 6: 95-97.

2020 Impact Factor: 1.327

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (257)
  • HTML views (162)
  • Cited by (2)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2022 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences | Privacy Policy