On the nonconserved Caginalp phase-field system based on the Maxwell-Cattaneo law with two temperatures and logarithmic potentials

Ahmad Makki; Alain Miranville; Georges Sadaka

doi:10.3934/dcdsb.2019019

Article Contents

2019, Volume 24, Issue 3: 1341-1365. Doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019019

This issue Previous Article Partial differential inclusions of transport type with state constraints Next Article Asymptotic behavior of the stochastic Keller-Segel equations

On the nonconserved Caginalp phase-field system based on the Maxwell-Cattaneo law with two temperatures and logarithmic potentials

1.
Université de Poitiers, Laboratoire de Mathématiques et Applications, UMR CNRS 7348, SP2MI, Boulevard Marie et Pierre Curie - Téléport 2, F-86962 Chasseneuil Futuroscope Cedex, France
2.
Xiamen University, School of Mathematical Sciences, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Mathematical Modeling, and High Performance Scientific Computing, Xiamen, Fujian, China
3.
Université de Poitiers, Laboratoire de Mathématiques et Applications, UMR CNRS 7348, Boulevard Marie et Pierre Curie - Téléport 2, F-86962 Chasseneuil Futuroscope Cedex, France
4.
Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Laboratoire Amiénois de Mathématique Fondamentale et Appliquée, UMR CNRS 7352, Pôle Scientifique, 33, rue Saint Leu, F-80039 Amiens, France

^* Corresponding author: Alain Miranville
^* Corresponding author: Alain Miranville

Received: December 31, 2017

Revised: February 28, 2018

Early access: January 2019

Published: January 2019

Abstract Full Text(HTML) Figure(8) / Table(12) Related Papers Cited by

Abstract

Our aim in this article is to study generalizations of the nonconserved Caginalp phase-field system based on the Maxwell-Cattaneo law with two temperatures for heat conduction and with logarithmic nonlinear terms. We obtain well-posedness results and study the asymptotic behavior of the system. In particular, we prove the existence of the global attractor. Furthermore, we give some numerical simulations, obtained with the $\mathtt{FreeFem++}$ software [24], comparing the nonconserved Caginalp phase-field model with regular and logarithmic nonlinear terms.

Keywords:

Mathematics Subject Classification: 35B45, 35K55, 35L15.

Citation:

Full Text(HTML)

Figure 1. Solution $ u $ with $ f_H = .1 $ and logarithmic potential

Download: Full-size image PowerPoint slide

Figure 2. Solution $u$ with $f_H = .1$ and cubic potential

Download: Full-size image PowerPoint slide

Figure 3. Solution $u$ with $f_H = .1$ and logarithmic potential

Download: Full-size image PowerPoint slide

Figure 4. Solution $u$ with $f_H = .1$ and cubic potential

Download: Full-size image PowerPoint slide

Figure 5. Solution $u$ with $f_H = 1.5$ and logarithmic potential

Download: Full-size image PowerPoint slide

Figure 6. Solution $u$ with $f_H = 1.5$ and cubic potential

Download: Full-size image PowerPoint slide

Figure 7. Solution $H$ with $f_H = 1.5$ and logarithmic potential

Download: Full-size image PowerPoint slide

Figure 8. Solution $H$ with $f_H = 1.5$ and cubic potential

Download: Full-size image PowerPoint slide

Table 1. $ L^2 $, $ H^1 $ norm and error for $ u $ and $ H $ for the nonconserved Caginalp phase-field system with $ \varepsilon = .1,\ \tau = .03 $ and $ f(s) = .83(s^3-.5^2s) $

$ 10^{2}\cdot\delta t $	CPU time	$ N_{L^2}(u) $	rate	$ N_{L^2}(H) $	rate	$ N_{H^1}(u) $	rate	$ N_{H^1}(H) $	rate
1/1	00:00:02	0.00147	-	0.00124	-	0.0573	-	0.05544	-
1/4	00:00:22	0.00038	0.98	0.0003	0.98	0.02927	0.48	0.02828	0.49
1/16	00:05:58	9.5e-05	0.99	8.1e-05	0.99	0.01472	0.49	0.01422	0.49
1/64	01:50:22	2.4e-05	0.99	2e-05	0.99	0.00737	0.49	0.00711	0.49
1/256	22:06:19	6e-06	1	5e-06	0.99	0.00369	0.5	0.00357	0.49

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Table 2. $L^2$, $H^1$ norm and error for $u$ and $H$ for the nonconserved Caginalp phase-field system with $\varepsilon = .1, \ \tau = .03$ and $f(s) = -2 \kappa_0 s+\kappa_1 \ln\left(\dfrac{1+s}{1-s}\right)$.

$10^{2}\cdot\delta t$	CPU time	$N_{L^2}(u)$	rate	$N_{L^2}(H)$	rate	$N_{H^1}(u)$	rate	$N_{H^1}(H)$	rate
1/1	00:00:02	0.00146	-	0.00124	-	0.05725	-	0.05544	-
1/4	00:00:25	0.00038	0.98	0.0003	0.98	0.02927	0.48	0.02828	0.49
1/16	00:07:44	9.5e-05	0.99	8.1e-05	0.99	0.01472	0.49	0.01422	0.49
1/64	01:52:09	2.4e-05	0.99	2e-05	0.99	0.00737	0.49	0.00711	0.49
1/256	23:06:55	6e-06	1	5e-06	0.99	0.00369	0.5	0.00357	0.49

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Table 3. $L^2$, $H^1$ norm and error for $u$ and $H$ for the nonconserved Caginalp phase-field system with $\varepsilon = .01, \ \tau = .03$ and $f(s) = .83(s^3-.5^2s)$

$10^{2}\cdot\delta t$	CPU time	$N_{L^2}(u)$	rate	$N_{L^2}(H)$	rate	$N_{H^1}(u)$	rate	$N_{H^1}(H)$	rate
1/1	00:00:01	0.00042	-	0.00039	-	0.02458	-	0.02397	-
1/4	00:00:22	0.00011	0.98	0.0001	0.98	0.01249	0.49	0.01215	0.49
1/16	00:07:09	2.7e-05	0.99	2.5e-05	0.99	0.00627	0.49	0.00611	0.49
1/64	01:27:20	7e-06	0.99	6e-06	0.99	0.00314	0.49	0.00306	0.49
1/256	22:16:47	2e-06	1	2e-06	0.99	0.00157	0.5	0.00154	0.49

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Table 4. $L^2$, $H^1$ norm and error for $u$ and $H$ for the nonconserved Caginalp phase-field system with $\varepsilon = .01, \ \tau = .03$ and $f(s) = -2 \kappa_0 s+\kappa_1 \ln\left(\dfrac{1+s}{1-s}\right)$.

$10^{2}\cdot\delta t$	CPU time	$N_{L^2}(u)$	rate	$N_{L^2}(H)$	rate	$N_{H^1}(u)$	rate	$N_{H^1}(H)$	rate
1/1	00:00:01	0.00042	-	0.00039	-	0.02457	-	0.02397	-
1/4	00:00:24	0.00011	0.98	0.0001	0.98	0.01248	0.49	0.01215	0.49
1/16	00:07:41	2.7e-05	0.99	2.5e-05	0.99	0.00627	0.49	0.00611	0.49
1/64	01:26:11	7e-06	0.99	6e-06	0.99	0.00314	0.49	0.00306	0.49
1/256	23:06:30	2e-06	1	2e-06	0.99	0.00157	0.5	0.00154	0.49

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Table 5. $L^2$, $H^1$ norm and error for $u$ and $H$ for the nonconserved Caginalp phase-field system with $\varepsilon = .001, \ \tau = .03$ and $f(s) = .83(s^3-.5^2s)$.

$10^{2}\cdot\delta t$	CPU time	$N_{L^2}(u)$	rate	$N_{L^2}(H)$	rate	$N_{H^1}(u)$	rate	$N_{H^1}(H)$	rate
1/1	00:00:01	0.00013	-	0.00012	-	0.01227	-	0.01186	-
1/4	00:00:22	3.4e-05	0.98	3.2e-05	0.98	0.00625	0.49	0.00603	0.49
1/16	00:07:19	9e-06	0.99	8e-06	0.99	0.00314	0.49	0.00303	0.49
1/64	01:29:47	2e-06	0.99	2e-06	0.99	0.00157	0.49	0.00152	0.49
1/256	22:23:29	1e-06	1	1e-06	0.99	0.00079	0.5	0.00076	0.49

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Table 6. $L^2$, $H^1$ norm and error for $u$ and $H$ for the nonconserved Caginalp phase-field system with $\varepsilon = .001, \ \tau = .03$ and $f(s) = -2 \kappa_0 s+\kappa_1 \ln\left(\dfrac{1+s}{1-s}\right)$.

$10^{2}\cdot\delta t$	CPU time	$N_{L^2}(u)$	rate	$N_{L^2}(H)$	rate	$N_{H^1}(u)$	rate	$N_{H^1}(H)$	rate
1/1	00:00:01	0.00013	-	0.00012	-	0.01226	-	0.011863	-
1/4	00:00:24	3.4e-05	0.98	3.2e-05	0.98	0.00624	0.49	0.00603	0.49
1/16	00:07:44	9e-06	0.99	8e-06	0.99	0.00314	0.49	0.00303	0.49
1/64	01:29:12	2e-06	0.99	2e-06	0.99	0.00157	0.49	0.00152	0.49
1/256	23:22:36	1e-06	1	1e-06	0.99	0.00079	0.5	0.00076	0.49

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Table 7. Comparison of the convergence of the solution $u$ with $\varepsilon = .1$.

$f_H$	$-35$	$-.1$	$0$	$.1$	$.2$	$1.5$	$15$	$35$
log	explose	$-.41$	$[-.37, .37]$	$.41$	.44	.62	$.94$	explose
pol	explose	$-.40$	$[-.37, .37]$	$.40$	.43	.64	explose	explose

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Table 8. Comparison of the convergence of the solution $u$ with $\varepsilon = .01$.

$f_H$	$-35$	$-.1$	$0$	$.1$	$.2$	$1.5$	$15$	$35$
log	$-.76$	$[-.49, .49]$	$[-.49, .49]$	$[-.49, .49]$	.49	.52	$.67$	$.76$
pol	$-.86$	$[-.49, .49]$	$[-.49, .49]$	$[-.49, .49]$	$.49$	$.52$	$.70$	$.86$

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Table 9. Comparison of the convergence of the solution $u$ with $\varepsilon = .001$.

$f_H$	$-35$	$-.1$	$0$	$.1$	$.2$	$1.5$	$15$	$35$
log	$-.56$	$[-.50, .50]$	$[-.50, .50]$	$[-.50, .50]$	$[-.50, .50]$	$[-.50, .50]$	$.53$	$.56$
pol	$-.57$	$[-.50, .50]$	$[-.50, .50]$	$[-.50, .50]$	$[-.50, .50]$	$[-.50, .50]$	$.53$	$.57$

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Table 10. Comparison of the convergence of the solution $u$ with $\varepsilon = .1$.

$f_H$	$-35$	$-.1$	$0$	$.1$	$.2$	$1.5$	$15$	$35$
log	explose	explose	explose	explose	.92	.94	.99	explose
pol	explose	explose	explose	explose	explose	.94	explose	explose

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Table 11. comp_log_eps_0p01_ln6} Comparison of the convergence of the solution $u$ with $\varepsilon = .01$.

$f_H$	$-35$	$-.1$	$0$	$.1$	$.2$	$1.5$	$15$	$35$
log	-.95	$[-.93, .93]$	$[-.93, .93]$	$[-.93, .93]$	$[-.93, .93]$	explose	.94	.95
pol	explose	explose	explose	explose	explose	explose	.96	explose

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Table 12. Comparison of the convergence of the solution $u$ with $\varepsilon = .001$.

$f_H$	$-35$	$-.1$	$0$	$.1$	$.2$	$1.5$	$15$	$35$
log	-.93	$[-.93, .93]$	$[-.93, .93]$	$[-.93, .93]$	$[-.93, .93]$	$[-.93, .93]$	explose	.93
pol	-.94	explose	explose	explose	explose	explose	explose	.94

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Related Papers

Cited by

References

[1]	S. Aizicovici and E. Feireisl, Long-time stabilization of solutions to a phase-field model with memory, J. Evol. Eqns., 1 (2001), 69-84. doi: 10.1007/PL00001365.
[2]	S. Aizicovici, E. Feireisl and F. Issard-Roch, Long-time convergence of solutions to a phase-field system, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 24 (2001), 277-287. doi: 10.1002/mma.215.
[3]	D. Brochet, X. Chen and D. Hilhorst, Finite dimensional exponential attractors for the phase-field model, Appl. Anal., 49 (1993), 197-212. doi: 10.1080/00036819108840173.
[4]	M. Brokate and J. Sprekels, Hysteresis and Phase Transitions, Springer, New York, 1996. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-4048-8.
[5]	G. Caginalp, An analysis of a phase-field model of a free boundary, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 92 (1986), 205-245. doi: 10.1007/BF00254827.
[6]	J. W. Cahn and J. E. Hilliard, Free energy of a nonuniform system Ⅰ. Interfacial free energy, J. Chem. Phys., 2 (1958), 258-267.
[7]	P. J. Chen and M. E. Gurtin, On a theory of heat involving two temperatures, J. Appl. Math. Phys. (ZAMP), 19 (1968), 614-627.
[8]	P. J. Chen, M. E. Gurtin and W. O. Williams, A note on a non-simple heat conduction, J. Appl. Math. Phys. (ZAMP), 19 (1968), 969-970. doi: 10.1007/BF01602278.
[9]	P. J. Chen, M. E. Gurtin and W. O. Williams, On the thermodynamics of non-simple materials with two temperatures, J. Appl. Math. Phys. (ZAMP), 20 (1969), 107-112. doi: 10.1007/BF01591120.
[10]	L. Cherfils and A. Miranville, Some results on the asymptotic behavior of the Caginalp system with singular potentials, Adv. Math. Sci. Appl., 17 (2007), 107-129.
[11]	L. Cherfils and A. Miranville, On the Caginalp system with dynamic boundary conditions and singular potentials, Appl. Math., 54 (2009), 89-115. doi: 10.1007/s10492-009-0008-6.
[12]	L. Cherfils, S. Gatti and A. Miranville, A doubly nonlinear parabolic equation with a singular potential, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Systems S, 4 (2011), 51-66. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2011.4.51.
[13]	R. Chill, E Fasangovà and J. Prüss, Convergence to steady states of solutions of the Cahn-Hilliard equation with dynamic boundary conditions, Math. Nachr., 279 (2006), 1448-1462. doi: 10.1002/mana.200410431.
[14]	C. I. Christov and P. M. Jordan, Heat conduction paradox involving second-sound propagation in moving medis, Phys. Review Letters, 94 (2005), 154301.
[15]	B. Doumbé, Etude de modèles de champs de phase de type Caginalp, Université de Poitiers, 2013.
[16]	A. S. El-Karamany and M. A. Ezzat, On the two-temperature Green-Naghdi thermoelasticity theories, J. Thermal Stresses, 34 (2011), 1207-1226. doi: 10.1080/01495739.2011.608313.
[17]	C. G. Gal and M. Grasselli, The nonisothermal Allen-Cahn equation with dynamic boundary conditions, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Systems A, 22 (2008), 1009-1040. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2008.22.1009.
[18]	S. Gatti and A. Miranville, Asymptotic behavior of a phase-field system with dynamic boundary conditions, in Differential Equations: Inverse and Direct Problems (Proceedings of the Workshop "Evolutiob Equations: Inverse and Direct Problems", Cortona, June 21-25, 2004), A series of Lecture notes in pure and applied mathematics, 251, A. Favini and A. Lorenzi eds., Chapman & Hall, 2006,149–170. doi: 10.1201/9781420011135.ch9.
[19]	M. Grasselli, A. Miranville, V. Pata and S. Zelik, Well-posedness and long time behavior of a parabolic-hyperbolic phase-field system with singular potentials, Math. Nachr., 280 (2007), 1475-1509. doi: 10.1002/mana.200510560.
[20]	M. Grasselli, A. Miranville and G. Schimperna, The Caginalp phase-field system with coupled dynamic boundary conditions and singular potentials, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Systems A, 28 (2010), 67-98. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.28.67.
[21]	M. Grasselli and V. Pata, Existence of a universal attractor for a fully hyperbolic phase-field system, J. Evol. Eqns., 4 (2004), 27-51. doi: 10.1007/s00028-003-0074-2.
[22]	M. Grasselli, H. Petzeltová and G. Schimperna, Long time behavior of solutions to the Caginalp system with singular potential, Z. Anal. Anwend., 25 (2006), 51-72. doi: 10.4171/ZAA/1277.
[23]	A. E. Green and P. M. Naghdi, A re-examination of the basic postulates of thermomechanics, Proc. Royal Society London A, 432 (1991), 171-194. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1991.0012.
[24]	F. Hecht, O. Pironneau, A. Le Hyaric and K. Ohtsuka, Freefem++ Manual, 2012.
[25]	J. Jiang, Convergence to equilibrium for a parabolic-hyperbolic phase-field model with Cattaneo heat flux law, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 341 (2008), 149-169. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.09.041.
[26]	J. Jiang, Convergence to equilibrium for a fully hyperbolic phase field model with Cattaneo heat flux law, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 32 (2009), 1156-1182. doi: 10.1002/mma.1092.
[27]	A. Miranville, Some mathematical models in phase transition, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Systems S, 7 (2014), 271-306. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2014.7.271.
[28]	A. Miranville and R. Quintanilla, A generalization of the Caginalp phase-field system based on the Cattaneo law, Nonlinear Anal. TMA, 71 (2009), 2278-2290. doi: 10.1016/j.na.2009.01.061.
[29]	A. Miranville and R. Quintanilla, Some generalizations of the Caginalp phase-field system, Appl. Anal., 88 (2009), 877-894. doi: 10.1080/00036810903042182.
[30]	A. Miranville and R. Quintanilla, A phase-field model based on a three-phase-lag heat conduction, Appl. Math. Optim., 63 (2011), 133-150. doi: 10.1007/s00245-010-9114-9.
[31]	A. Miranville and R. Quintanilla, A type $\rm III$ phase-field system with a logarithmic potential, Appl. Math. Letters, 24 (2011), 1003-1008. doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2011.01.016.
[32]	A. Miranville and R. Quintanilla, A generalization of the Allen-Cahn equation, IMA J. Appl. Math., 80 (2015), 410-430. doi: 10.1093/imamat/hxt044.
[33]	A. Miranville and R. Quintanilla, A Caginalp phase-field system based on type Ⅲ heat conduction with two temperatures, Quart. Appl. Math., 74 (2016), 375-398. doi: 10.1090/qam/1430.
[34]	A. Miranville and R. Quintanilla, On the Caginalp phase-field systems with two temperatures and the Maxwell-Cattaneo law, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 39 (2016), 4385-4397. doi: 10.1002/mma.3867.
[35]	A. Miranville and S. Zelik, Robust exponential attractors for singularly perturbed phase-field type equations, Electronic J. Diff. Eqns., 2002 (2002), 1-28.
[36]	A. Miranville and S. Zelik, Exponential attractors for the Cahn-Hilliard equation with dynamic boundary conditions, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 28 (2005), 709-735. doi: 10.1002/mma.590.
[37]	R. Quintanilla, A well-posed problem for the three-dual-phase-lag heat conduction, J. Thermal Stresses, 32 (2009), 1270-1278. doi: 10.1080/01495730903310599.
[38]	G. Sadaka, Solution of 2D Boussinesq systems with FreeFem++: The flat bottom case, J. Numer. Math., 20 (2012), 303-324. doi: 10.1515/jnum-2012-0016.
[39]	H. M. Youssef, Theory of two-temperature-generalized thermoelasticity, IMA J. Appl. Math., 71 (2006), 383-390. doi: 10.1093/imamat/hxh101.
[40]	Z. Zhang, Asymptotic behavior of solutions to the phase-field equations with Neumann boundary conditions, Comm. Pure Appl. Anal., 4 (2005), 683-693. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2005.4.683.