American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
March  2019, 24(3): 1341-1365. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019019

On the nonconserved Caginalp phase-field system based on the Maxwell-Cattaneo law with two temperatures and logarithmic potentials

Ahmad Makki 1, , Alain Miranville 2,3,, and  Georges Sadaka 4,

1. 

Université de Poitiers, Laboratoire de Mathématiques et Applications, UMR CNRS 7348, SP2MI, Boulevard Marie et Pierre Curie - Téléport 2, F-86962 Chasseneuil Futuroscope Cedex, France
2. 

Xiamen University, School of Mathematical Sciences, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Mathematical Modeling, and High Performance Scientific Computing, Xiamen, Fujian, China
3. 

Université de Poitiers, Laboratoire de Mathématiques et Applications, UMR CNRS 7348, Boulevard Marie et Pierre Curie - Téléport 2, F-86962 Chasseneuil Futuroscope Cedex, France
4. 

Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Laboratoire Amiénois de Mathématique Fondamentale et Appliquée, UMR CNRS 7352, Pôle Scientifique, 33, rue Saint Leu, F-80039 Amiens, France

* Corresponding author: Alain Miranville

Received  January 2018 Revised  March 2018 Published  March 2019 Early access  January 2019

Our aim in this article is to study generalizations of the nonconserved Caginalp phase-field system based on the Maxwell-Cattaneo law with two temperatures for heat conduction and with logarithmic nonlinear terms. We obtain well-posedness results and study the asymptotic behavior of the system. In particular, we prove the existence of the global attractor. Furthermore, we give some numerical simulations, obtained with the $\mathtt{FreeFem++}$ software [24], comparing the nonconserved Caginalp phase-field model with regular and logarithmic nonlinear terms.

Keywords: Caginalp system, Maxwell-Cattaneo law, two temperatures, logarithmic nonlinear terms, well-posedness, dissipativity, global attractor, simulations.
Mathematics Subject Classification: 35B45, 35K55, 35L15.
Citation: Ahmad Makki, Alain Miranville, Georges Sadaka. On the nonconserved Caginalp phase-field system based on the Maxwell-Cattaneo law with two temperatures and logarithmic potentials. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (3) : 1341-1365. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019019
References:
[1]

S. Aizicovici and E. Feireisl, Long-time stabilization of solutions to a phase-field model with memory, J. Evol. Eqns., 1 (2001), 69-84.  doi: 10.1007/PL00001365.

[2]

S. Aizicovici, E. Feireisl and F. Issard-Roch, Long-time convergence of solutions to a phase-field system, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 24 (2001), 277-287.  doi: 10.1002/mma.215.

[3]

D. Brochet, X. Chen and D. Hilhorst, Finite dimensional exponential attractors for the phase-field model, Appl. Anal., 49 (1993), 197-212.  doi: 10.1080/00036819108840173.

[4]

M. Brokate and J. Sprekels, Hysteresis and Phase Transitions, Springer, New York, 1996. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-4048-8.

[5]

G. Caginalp, An analysis of a phase-field model of a free boundary, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 92 (1986), 205-245.  doi: 10.1007/BF00254827.

[6]

J. W. Cahn and J. E. Hilliard, Free energy of a nonuniform system Ⅰ. Interfacial free energy, J. Chem. Phys., 2 (1958), 258-267. 

[7]

P. J. Chen and M. E. Gurtin, On a theory of heat involving two temperatures, J. Appl. Math. Phys. (ZAMP), 19 (1968), 614-627. 

[8]

P. J. Chen, M. E. Gurtin and W. O. Williams, A note on a non-simple heat conduction, J. Appl. Math. Phys. (ZAMP), 19 (1968), 969-970.  doi: 10.1007/BF01602278.

[9]

P. J. Chen, M. E. Gurtin and W. O. Williams, On the thermodynamics of non-simple materials with two temperatures, J. Appl. Math. Phys. (ZAMP), 20 (1969), 107-112.  doi: 10.1007/BF01591120.

[10]

L. Cherfils and A. Miranville, Some results on the asymptotic behavior of the Caginalp system with singular potentials, Adv. Math. Sci. Appl., 17 (2007), 107-129. 

[11]

L. Cherfils and A. Miranville, On the Caginalp system with dynamic boundary conditions and singular potentials, Appl. Math., 54 (2009), 89-115.  doi: 10.1007/s10492-009-0008-6.

[12]

L. Cherfils, S. Gatti and A. Miranville, A doubly nonlinear parabolic equation with a singular potential, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Systems S, 4 (2011), 51-66.  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2011.4.51.

[13]

R. Chill, E Fasangovà and J. Prüss, Convergence to steady states of solutions of the Cahn-Hilliard equation with dynamic boundary conditions, Math. Nachr., 279 (2006), 1448-1462.  doi: 10.1002/mana.200410431.

[14]

C. I. Christov and P. M. Jordan, Heat conduction paradox involving second-sound propagation in moving medis, Phys. Review Letters, 94 (2005), 154301.

[15]

B. Doumbé, Etude de modèles de champs de phase de type Caginalp, Université de Poitiers, 2013.

[16]

A. S. El-Karamany and M. A. Ezzat, On the two-temperature Green-Naghdi thermoelasticity theories, J. Thermal Stresses, 34 (2011), 1207-1226.  doi: 10.1080/01495739.2011.608313.

[17]

C. G. Gal and M. Grasselli, The nonisothermal Allen-Cahn equation with dynamic boundary conditions, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Systems A, 22 (2008), 1009-1040.  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2008.22.1009.

[18]

S. Gatti and A. Miranville, Asymptotic behavior of a phase-field system with dynamic boundary conditions, in Differential Equations: Inverse and Direct Problems (Proceedings of the Workshop "Evolutiob Equations: Inverse and Direct Problems", Cortona, June 21-25, 2004), A series of Lecture notes in pure and applied mathematics, 251, A. Favini and A. Lorenzi eds., Chapman & Hall, 2006,149–170. doi: 10.1201/9781420011135.ch9.

[19]

M. Grasselli, A. Miranville, V. Pata and S. Zelik, Well-posedness and long time behavior of a parabolic-hyperbolic phase-field system with singular potentials, Math. Nachr., 280 (2007), 1475-1509.  doi: 10.1002/mana.200510560.

[20]

M. Grasselli, A. Miranville and G. Schimperna, The Caginalp phase-field system with coupled dynamic boundary conditions and singular potentials, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Systems A, 28 (2010), 67-98.  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.28.67.

[21]

M. Grasselli and V. Pata, Existence of a universal attractor for a fully hyperbolic phase-field system, J. Evol. Eqns., 4 (2004), 27-51.  doi: 10.1007/s00028-003-0074-2.

[22]

M. Grasselli, H. Petzeltová and G. Schimperna, Long time behavior of solutions to the Caginalp system with singular potential, Z. Anal. Anwend., 25 (2006), 51-72.  doi: 10.4171/ZAA/1277.

[23]

A. E. Green and P. M. Naghdi, A re-examination of the basic postulates of thermomechanics, Proc. Royal Society London A, 432 (1991), 171-194.  doi: 10.1098/rspa.1991.0012.

[24]

F. Hecht, O. Pironneau, A. Le Hyaric and K. Ohtsuka, Freefem++ Manual, 2012.

[25]

J. Jiang, Convergence to equilibrium for a parabolic-hyperbolic phase-field model with Cattaneo heat flux law, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 341 (2008), 149-169.  doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.09.041.

[26]

J. Jiang, Convergence to equilibrium for a fully hyperbolic phase field model with Cattaneo heat flux law, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 32 (2009), 1156-1182.  doi: 10.1002/mma.1092.

[27]

A. Miranville, Some mathematical models in phase transition, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Systems S, 7 (2014), 271-306.  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2014.7.271.

[28]

A. Miranville and R. Quintanilla, A generalization of the Caginalp phase-field system based on the Cattaneo law, Nonlinear Anal. TMA, 71 (2009), 2278-2290.  doi: 10.1016/j.na.2009.01.061.

[29]

A. Miranville and R. Quintanilla, Some generalizations of the Caginalp phase-field system, Appl. Anal., 88 (2009), 877-894.  doi: 10.1080/00036810903042182.

[30]

A. Miranville and R. Quintanilla, A phase-field model based on a three-phase-lag heat conduction, Appl. Math. Optim., 63 (2011), 133-150.  doi: 10.1007/s00245-010-9114-9.

[31]

A. Miranville and R. Quintanilla, A type $\rm III$ phase-field system with a logarithmic potential, Appl. Math. Letters, 24 (2011), 1003-1008.  doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2011.01.016.

[32]

A. Miranville and R. Quintanilla, A generalization of the Allen-Cahn equation, IMA J. Appl. Math., 80 (2015), 410-430.  doi: 10.1093/imamat/hxt044.

[33]

A. Miranville and R. Quintanilla, A Caginalp phase-field system based on type Ⅲ heat conduction with two temperatures, Quart. Appl. Math., 74 (2016), 375-398.  doi: 10.1090/qam/1430.

[34]

A. Miranville and R. Quintanilla, On the Caginalp phase-field systems with two temperatures and the Maxwell-Cattaneo law, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 39 (2016), 4385-4397.  doi: 10.1002/mma.3867.

[35]

A. Miranville and S. Zelik, Robust exponential attractors for singularly perturbed phase-field type equations, Electronic J. Diff. Eqns., 2002 (2002), 1-28. 

[36]

A. Miranville and S. Zelik, Exponential attractors for the Cahn-Hilliard equation with dynamic boundary conditions, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 28 (2005), 709-735.  doi: 10.1002/mma.590.

[37]

R. Quintanilla, A well-posed problem for the three-dual-phase-lag heat conduction, J. Thermal Stresses, 32 (2009), 1270-1278.  doi: 10.1080/01495730903310599.

[38]

G. Sadaka, Solution of 2D Boussinesq systems with FreeFem++: The flat bottom case, J. Numer. Math., 20 (2012), 303-324.  doi: 10.1515/jnum-2012-0016.

[39]

H. M. Youssef, Theory of two-temperature-generalized thermoelasticity, IMA J. Appl. Math., 71 (2006), 383-390.  doi: 10.1093/imamat/hxh101.

[40]

Z. Zhang, Asymptotic behavior of solutions to the phase-field equations with Neumann boundary conditions, Comm. Pure Appl. Anal., 4 (2005), 683-693.  doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2005.4.683.

show all references

References:
[1]

S. Aizicovici and E. Feireisl, Long-time stabilization of solutions to a phase-field model with memory, J. Evol. Eqns., 1 (2001), 69-84.  doi: 10.1007/PL00001365.

[2]

S. Aizicovici, E. Feireisl and F. Issard-Roch, Long-time convergence of solutions to a phase-field system, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 24 (2001), 277-287.  doi: 10.1002/mma.215.

[3]

D. Brochet, X. Chen and D. Hilhorst, Finite dimensional exponential attractors for the phase-field model, Appl. Anal., 49 (1993), 197-212.  doi: 10.1080/00036819108840173.

[4]

M. Brokate and J. Sprekels, Hysteresis and Phase Transitions, Springer, New York, 1996. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-4048-8.

[5]

G. Caginalp, An analysis of a phase-field model of a free boundary, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 92 (1986), 205-245.  doi: 10.1007/BF00254827.

[6]

J. W. Cahn and J. E. Hilliard, Free energy of a nonuniform system Ⅰ. Interfacial free energy, J. Chem. Phys., 2 (1958), 258-267. 

[7]

P. J. Chen and M. E. Gurtin, On a theory of heat involving two temperatures, J. Appl. Math. Phys. (ZAMP), 19 (1968), 614-627. 

[8]

P. J. Chen, M. E. Gurtin and W. O. Williams, A note on a non-simple heat conduction, J. Appl. Math. Phys. (ZAMP), 19 (1968), 969-970.  doi: 10.1007/BF01602278.

[9]

P. J. Chen, M. E. Gurtin and W. O. Williams, On the thermodynamics of non-simple materials with two temperatures, J. Appl. Math. Phys. (ZAMP), 20 (1969), 107-112.  doi: 10.1007/BF01591120.

[10]

L. Cherfils and A. Miranville, Some results on the asymptotic behavior of the Caginalp system with singular potentials, Adv. Math. Sci. Appl., 17 (2007), 107-129. 

[11]

L. Cherfils and A. Miranville, On the Caginalp system with dynamic boundary conditions and singular potentials, Appl. Math., 54 (2009), 89-115.  doi: 10.1007/s10492-009-0008-6.

[12]

L. Cherfils, S. Gatti and A. Miranville, A doubly nonlinear parabolic equation with a singular potential, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Systems S, 4 (2011), 51-66.  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2011.4.51.

[13]

R. Chill, E Fasangovà and J. Prüss, Convergence to steady states of solutions of the Cahn-Hilliard equation with dynamic boundary conditions, Math. Nachr., 279 (2006), 1448-1462.  doi: 10.1002/mana.200410431.

[14]

C. I. Christov and P. M. Jordan, Heat conduction paradox involving second-sound propagation in moving medis, Phys. Review Letters, 94 (2005), 154301.

[15]

B. Doumbé, Etude de modèles de champs de phase de type Caginalp, Université de Poitiers, 2013.

[16]

A. S. El-Karamany and M. A. Ezzat, On the two-temperature Green-Naghdi thermoelasticity theories, J. Thermal Stresses, 34 (2011), 1207-1226.  doi: 10.1080/01495739.2011.608313.

[17]

C. G. Gal and M. Grasselli, The nonisothermal Allen-Cahn equation with dynamic boundary conditions, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Systems A, 22 (2008), 1009-1040.  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2008.22.1009.

[18]

S. Gatti and A. Miranville, Asymptotic behavior of a phase-field system with dynamic boundary conditions, in Differential Equations: Inverse and Direct Problems (Proceedings of the Workshop "Evolutiob Equations: Inverse and Direct Problems", Cortona, June 21-25, 2004), A series of Lecture notes in pure and applied mathematics, 251, A. Favini and A. Lorenzi eds., Chapman & Hall, 2006,149–170. doi: 10.1201/9781420011135.ch9.

[19]

M. Grasselli, A. Miranville, V. Pata and S. Zelik, Well-posedness and long time behavior of a parabolic-hyperbolic phase-field system with singular potentials, Math. Nachr., 280 (2007), 1475-1509.  doi: 10.1002/mana.200510560.

[20]

M. Grasselli, A. Miranville and G. Schimperna, The Caginalp phase-field system with coupled dynamic boundary conditions and singular potentials, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Systems A, 28 (2010), 67-98.  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.28.67.

[21]

M. Grasselli and V. Pata, Existence of a universal attractor for a fully hyperbolic phase-field system, J. Evol. Eqns., 4 (2004), 27-51.  doi: 10.1007/s00028-003-0074-2.

[22]

M. Grasselli, H. Petzeltová and G. Schimperna, Long time behavior of solutions to the Caginalp system with singular potential, Z. Anal. Anwend., 25 (2006), 51-72.  doi: 10.4171/ZAA/1277.

[23]

A. E. Green and P. M. Naghdi, A re-examination of the basic postulates of thermomechanics, Proc. Royal Society London A, 432 (1991), 171-194.  doi: 10.1098/rspa.1991.0012.

[24]

F. Hecht, O. Pironneau, A. Le Hyaric and K. Ohtsuka, Freefem++ Manual, 2012.

[25]

J. Jiang, Convergence to equilibrium for a parabolic-hyperbolic phase-field model with Cattaneo heat flux law, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 341 (2008), 149-169.  doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.09.041.

[26]

J. Jiang, Convergence to equilibrium for a fully hyperbolic phase field model with Cattaneo heat flux law, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 32 (2009), 1156-1182.  doi: 10.1002/mma.1092.

[27]

A. Miranville, Some mathematical models in phase transition, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Systems S, 7 (2014), 271-306.  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2014.7.271.

[28]

A. Miranville and R. Quintanilla, A generalization of the Caginalp phase-field system based on the Cattaneo law, Nonlinear Anal. TMA, 71 (2009), 2278-2290.  doi: 10.1016/j.na.2009.01.061.

[29]

A. Miranville and R. Quintanilla, Some generalizations of the Caginalp phase-field system, Appl. Anal., 88 (2009), 877-894.  doi: 10.1080/00036810903042182.

[30]

A. Miranville and R. Quintanilla, A phase-field model based on a three-phase-lag heat conduction, Appl. Math. Optim., 63 (2011), 133-150.  doi: 10.1007/s00245-010-9114-9.

[31]

A. Miranville and R. Quintanilla, A type $\rm III$ phase-field system with a logarithmic potential, Appl. Math. Letters, 24 (2011), 1003-1008.  doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2011.01.016.

[32]

A. Miranville and R. Quintanilla, A generalization of the Allen-Cahn equation, IMA J. Appl. Math., 80 (2015), 410-430.  doi: 10.1093/imamat/hxt044.

[33]

A. Miranville and R. Quintanilla, A Caginalp phase-field system based on type Ⅲ heat conduction with two temperatures, Quart. Appl. Math., 74 (2016), 375-398.  doi: 10.1090/qam/1430.

[34]

A. Miranville and R. Quintanilla, On the Caginalp phase-field systems with two temperatures and the Maxwell-Cattaneo law, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 39 (2016), 4385-4397.  doi: 10.1002/mma.3867.

[35]

A. Miranville and S. Zelik, Robust exponential attractors for singularly perturbed phase-field type equations, Electronic J. Diff. Eqns., 2002 (2002), 1-28. 

[36]

A. Miranville and S. Zelik, Exponential attractors for the Cahn-Hilliard equation with dynamic boundary conditions, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 28 (2005), 709-735.  doi: 10.1002/mma.590.

[37]

R. Quintanilla, A well-posed problem for the three-dual-phase-lag heat conduction, J. Thermal Stresses, 32 (2009), 1270-1278.  doi: 10.1080/01495730903310599.

[38]

G. Sadaka, Solution of 2D Boussinesq systems with FreeFem++: The flat bottom case, J. Numer. Math., 20 (2012), 303-324.  doi: 10.1515/jnum-2012-0016.

[39]

H. M. Youssef, Theory of two-temperature-generalized thermoelasticity, IMA J. Appl. Math., 71 (2006), 383-390.  doi: 10.1093/imamat/hxh101.

[40]

Z. Zhang, Asymptotic behavior of solutions to the phase-field equations with Neumann boundary conditions, Comm. Pure Appl. Anal., 4 (2005), 683-693.  doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2005.4.683.

Figure 1.  Solution $ u $ with $ f_H = .1 $ and logarithmic potential
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2.  Solution $u$ with $f_H = .1$ and cubic potential
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3.  Solution $u$ with $f_H = .1$ and logarithmic potential
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4.  Solution $u$ with $f_H = .1$ and cubic potential
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 5.  Solution $u$ with $f_H = 1.5$ and logarithmic potential
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 6.  Solution $u$ with $f_H = 1.5$ and cubic potential
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 7.  Solution $H$ with $f_H = 1.5$ and logarithmic potential
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 8.  Solution $H$ with $f_H = 1.5$ and cubic potential
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Table 1.  $ L^2 $, $ H^1 $ norm and error for $ u $ and $ H $ for the nonconserved Caginalp phase-field system with $ \varepsilon = .1,\ \tau = .03 $ and $ f(s) = .83(s^3-.5^2s) $
$ 10^{2}\cdot\delta t $ CPU time $ N_{L^2}(u) $ rate $ N_{L^2}(H) $ rate $ N_{H^1}(u) $ rate $ N_{H^1}(H) $ rate
1/1 00:00:02 0.00147 - 0.00124 - 0.0573 - 0.05544 -
1/4 00:00:22 0.00038 0.98 0.0003 0.98 0.02927 0.48 0.02828 0.49
1/16 00:05:58 9.5e-05 0.99 8.1e-05 0.99 0.01472 0.49 0.01422 0.49
1/64 01:50:22 2.4e-05 0.99 2e-05 0.99 0.00737 0.49 0.00711 0.49
1/256 22:06:19 6e-06 1 5e-06 0.99 0.00369 0.5 0.00357 0.49
Table Options

Download as excel

$ 10^{2}\cdot\delta t $ CPU time $ N_{L^2}(u) $ rate $ N_{L^2}(H) $ rate $ N_{H^1}(u) $ rate $ N_{H^1}(H) $ rate
1/1 00:00:02 0.00147 - 0.00124 - 0.0573 - 0.05544 -
1/4 00:00:22 0.00038 0.98 0.0003 0.98 0.02927 0.48 0.02828 0.49
1/16 00:05:58 9.5e-05 0.99 8.1e-05 0.99 0.01472 0.49 0.01422 0.49
1/64 01:50:22 2.4e-05 0.99 2e-05 0.99 0.00737 0.49 0.00711 0.49
1/256 22:06:19 6e-06 1 5e-06 0.99 0.00369 0.5 0.00357 0.49
Table 2.  $L^2$, $H^1$ norm and error for $u$ and $H$ for the nonconserved Caginalp phase-field system with $\varepsilon = .1, \ \tau = .03$ and $f(s) = -2 \kappa_0 s+\kappa_1 \ln\left(\dfrac{1+s}{1-s}\right)$.
$10^{2}\cdot\delta t$CPU time$N_{L^2}(u)$rate$N_{L^2}(H)$rate$N_{H^1}(u)$rate$N_{H^1}(H)$rate
1/100:00:020.00146-0.00124-0.05725-0.05544-
1/400:00:250.000380.980.00030.980.029270.480.028280.49
1/1600:07:449.5e-050.998.1e-050.990.014720.490.014220.49
1/6401:52:092.4e-050.992e-050.990.007370.490.007110.49
1/25623:06:556e-0615e-060.990.003690.50.003570.49
Table Options

Download as excel

$10^{2}\cdot\delta t$CPU time$N_{L^2}(u)$rate$N_{L^2}(H)$rate$N_{H^1}(u)$rate$N_{H^1}(H)$rate
1/100:00:020.00146-0.00124-0.05725-0.05544-
1/400:00:250.000380.980.00030.980.029270.480.028280.49
1/1600:07:449.5e-050.998.1e-050.990.014720.490.014220.49
1/6401:52:092.4e-050.992e-050.990.007370.490.007110.49
1/25623:06:556e-0615e-060.990.003690.50.003570.49
Table 3.  $L^2$, $H^1$ norm and error for $u$ and $H$ for the nonconserved Caginalp phase-field system with $\varepsilon = .01, \ \tau = .03$ and $f(s) = .83(s^3-.5^2s)$
$10^{2}\cdot\delta t$CPU time$N_{L^2}(u)$rate$N_{L^2}(H)$rate$N_{H^1}(u)$rate$N_{H^1}(H)$rate
1/100:00:010.00042-0.00039-0.02458-0.02397-
1/400:00:220.000110.980.00010.980.012490.490.012150.49
1/1600:07:092.7e-050.992.5e-050.990.006270.490.006110.49
1/6401:27:207e-060.996e-060.990.003140.490.003060.49
1/25622:16:472e-0612e-060.990.001570.50.001540.49
Table Options

Download as excel

$10^{2}\cdot\delta t$CPU time$N_{L^2}(u)$rate$N_{L^2}(H)$rate$N_{H^1}(u)$rate$N_{H^1}(H)$rate
1/100:00:010.00042-0.00039-0.02458-0.02397-
1/400:00:220.000110.980.00010.980.012490.490.012150.49
1/1600:07:092.7e-050.992.5e-050.990.006270.490.006110.49
1/6401:27:207e-060.996e-060.990.003140.490.003060.49
1/25622:16:472e-0612e-060.990.001570.50.001540.49
Table 4.  $L^2$, $H^1$ norm and error for $u$ and $H$ for the nonconserved Caginalp phase-field system with $\varepsilon = .01, \ \tau = .03$ and $f(s) = -2 \kappa_0 s+\kappa_1 \ln\left(\dfrac{1+s}{1-s}\right)$.
$10^{2}\cdot\delta t$CPU time$N_{L^2}(u)$rate$N_{L^2}(H)$rate$N_{H^1}(u)$rate$N_{H^1}(H)$rate
1/100:00:010.00042-0.00039-0.02457-0.02397-
1/400:00:240.000110.980.00010.980.012480.490.012150.49
1/1600:07:412.7e-050.992.5e-050.990.006270.490.006110.49
1/6401:26:117e-060.996e-060.990.003140.490.003060.49
1/25623:06:302e-0612e-060.990.001570.50.001540.49
Table Options

Download as excel

$10^{2}\cdot\delta t$CPU time$N_{L^2}(u)$rate$N_{L^2}(H)$rate$N_{H^1}(u)$rate$N_{H^1}(H)$rate
1/100:00:010.00042-0.00039-0.02457-0.02397-
1/400:00:240.000110.980.00010.980.012480.490.012150.49
1/1600:07:412.7e-050.992.5e-050.990.006270.490.006110.49
1/6401:26:117e-060.996e-060.990.003140.490.003060.49
1/25623:06:302e-0612e-060.990.001570.50.001540.49
Table 5.  $L^2$, $H^1$ norm and error for $u$ and $H$ for the nonconserved Caginalp phase-field system with $\varepsilon = .001, \ \tau = .03$ and $f(s) = .83(s^3-.5^2s)$.
$10^{2}\cdot\delta t$CPU time$N_{L^2}(u)$rate$N_{L^2}(H)$rate$N_{H^1}(u)$rate$N_{H^1}(H)$rate
1/100:00:010.00013-0.00012-0.01227-0.01186-
1/400:00:223.4e-050.983.2e-050.980.006250.490.006030.49
1/1600:07:199e-060.998e-060.990.003140.490.003030.49
1/6401:29:472e-060.992e-060.990.001570.490.001520.49
1/25622:23:291e-0611e-060.990.000790.50.000760.49
Table Options

Download as excel

$10^{2}\cdot\delta t$CPU time$N_{L^2}(u)$rate$N_{L^2}(H)$rate$N_{H^1}(u)$rate$N_{H^1}(H)$rate
1/100:00:010.00013-0.00012-0.01227-0.01186-
1/400:00:223.4e-050.983.2e-050.980.006250.490.006030.49
1/1600:07:199e-060.998e-060.990.003140.490.003030.49
1/6401:29:472e-060.992e-060.990.001570.490.001520.49
1/25622:23:291e-0611e-060.990.000790.50.000760.49
Table 6.  $L^2$, $H^1$ norm and error for $u$ and $H$ for the nonconserved Caginalp phase-field system with $\varepsilon = .001, \ \tau = .03$ and $f(s) = -2 \kappa_0 s+\kappa_1 \ln\left(\dfrac{1+s}{1-s}\right)$.
$10^{2}\cdot\delta t$CPU time$N_{L^2}(u)$rate$N_{L^2}(H)$rate$N_{H^1}(u)$rate$N_{H^1}(H)$rate
1/100:00:010.00013-0.00012-0.01226-0.011863-
1/400:00:243.4e-050.983.2e-050.980.006240.490.006030.49
1/1600:07:449e-060.998e-060.990.003140.490.003030.49
1/6401:29:122e-060.992e-060.990.001570.490.001520.49
1/25623:22:361e-0611e-060.990.000790.50.000760.49
Table Options

Download as excel

$10^{2}\cdot\delta t$CPU time$N_{L^2}(u)$rate$N_{L^2}(H)$rate$N_{H^1}(u)$rate$N_{H^1}(H)$rate
1/100:00:010.00013-0.00012-0.01226-0.011863-
1/400:00:243.4e-050.983.2e-050.980.006240.490.006030.49
1/1600:07:449e-060.998e-060.990.003140.490.003030.49
1/6401:29:122e-060.992e-060.990.001570.490.001520.49
1/25623:22:361e-0611e-060.990.000790.50.000760.49
Table 7.  Comparison of the convergence of the solution $u$ with $\varepsilon = .1$.
$f_H$$-35$$-.1$$0$$.1$$.2$$1.5$$15$$35$
logexplose$-.41$$[-.37, .37]$$.41$.44.62$.94$explose
polexplose$-.40$$[-.37, .37]$$.40$.43.64exploseexplose
Table Options

Download as excel

$f_H$$-35$$-.1$$0$$.1$$.2$$1.5$$15$$35$
logexplose$-.41$$[-.37, .37]$$.41$.44.62$.94$explose
polexplose$-.40$$[-.37, .37]$$.40$.43.64exploseexplose
Table 8.  Comparison of the convergence of the solution $u$ with $\varepsilon = .01$.
$f_H$$-35$$-.1$$0$$.1$$.2$$1.5$$15$$35$
log$-.76$$[-.49, .49]$$[-.49, .49]$$[-.49, .49]$.49.52$.67$$.76$
pol$-.86$$[-.49, .49]$$[-.49, .49]$$[-.49, .49]$$.49$$.52$$.70$$.86$
Table Options

Download as excel

$f_H$$-35$$-.1$$0$$.1$$.2$$1.5$$15$$35$
log$-.76$$[-.49, .49]$$[-.49, .49]$$[-.49, .49]$.49.52$.67$$.76$
pol$-.86$$[-.49, .49]$$[-.49, .49]$$[-.49, .49]$$.49$$.52$$.70$$.86$
Table 9.  Comparison of the convergence of the solution $u$ with $\varepsilon = .001$.
$f_H$$-35$$-.1$$0$$.1$$.2$$1.5$$15$$35$
log$-.56$$[-.50, .50]$$[-.50, .50]$$[-.50, .50]$$[-.50, .50]$$[-.50, .50]$$.53$$.56$
pol$-.57$$[-.50, .50]$$[-.50, .50]$$[-.50, .50]$$[-.50, .50]$$[-.50, .50]$$.53$$.57$
Table Options

Download as excel

$f_H$$-35$$-.1$$0$$.1$$.2$$1.5$$15$$35$
log$-.56$$[-.50, .50]$$[-.50, .50]$$[-.50, .50]$$[-.50, .50]$$[-.50, .50]$$.53$$.56$
pol$-.57$$[-.50, .50]$$[-.50, .50]$$[-.50, .50]$$[-.50, .50]$$[-.50, .50]$$.53$$.57$
Table 10.  Comparison of the convergence of the solution $u$ with $\varepsilon = .1$.
$f_H$$-35$$-.1$$0$$.1$$.2$$1.5$$15$$35$
logexploseexploseexploseexplose.92.94.99explose
polexploseexploseexploseexploseexplose.94exploseexplose
Table Options

Download as excel

$f_H$$-35$$-.1$$0$$.1$$.2$$1.5$$15$$35$
logexploseexploseexploseexplose.92.94.99explose
polexploseexploseexploseexploseexplose.94exploseexplose
Table 11.  comp_log_eps_0p01_ln6} Comparison of the convergence of the solution $u$ with $\varepsilon = .01$.
$f_H$$-35$$-.1$$0$$.1$$.2$$1.5$$15$$35$
log-.95$[-.93, .93]$$[-.93, .93]$$[-.93, .93]$$[-.93, .93]$explose.94.95
polexploseexploseexploseexploseexploseexplose.96explose
Table Options

Download as excel

$f_H$$-35$$-.1$$0$$.1$$.2$$1.5$$15$$35$
log-.95$[-.93, .93]$$[-.93, .93]$$[-.93, .93]$$[-.93, .93]$explose.94.95
polexploseexploseexploseexploseexploseexplose.96explose
Table 12.  Comparison of the convergence of the solution $u$ with $\varepsilon = .001$.
$f_H$$-35$$-.1$$0$$.1$$.2$$1.5$$15$$35$
log-.93$[-.93, .93]$$[-.93, .93]$$[-.93, .93]$$[-.93, .93]$$[-.93, .93]$explose.93
pol-.94exploseexploseexploseexploseexploseexplose.94
Table Options

Download as excel

$f_H$$-35$$-.1$$0$$.1$$.2$$1.5$$15$$35$
log-.93$[-.93, .93]$$[-.93, .93]$$[-.93, .93]$$[-.93, .93]$$[-.93, .93]$explose.93
pol-.94exploseexploseexploseexploseexploseexplose.94
[1]

Alain Miranville. Asymptotic behavior of the conserved Caginalp phase-field system based on the Maxwell-Cattaneo law. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2014, 13 (5) : 1971-1987. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2014.13.1971
[2]

Gaocheng Yue, Chengkui Zhong. On the global well-posedness to the 3-D Navier-Stokes-Maxwell system. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2016, 36 (10) : 5817-5835. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016056
[3]

Hartmut Pecher. Local well-posedness for the Maxwell-Dirac system in temporal gauge. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2022, 42 (6) : 3065-3076. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2022008
[4]

Yuan Xu, Fujun Zhou, Weihua Gong. Global Well-posedness and Optimal Decay Rate of the Quasi-static Incompressible Navier–Stokes–Fourier–Maxwell–Poisson System. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2022, 21 (5) : 1537-1565. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2022028
[5]

Yinsong Bai, Lin He, Huijiang Zhao. Nonlinear stability of rarefaction waves for a hyperbolic system with Cattaneo's law. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2021, 20 (7&8) : 2441-2474. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2021049
[6]

Hartmut Pecher. Local well-posedness for the nonlinear Dirac equation in two space dimensions. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2014, 13 (2) : 673-685. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2014.13.673
[7]

Nobu Kishimoto, Minjie Shan, Yoshio Tsutsumi. Global well-posedness and existence of the global attractor for the Kadomtsev-Petviashvili Ⅱ equation in the anisotropic Sobolev space. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2020, 40 (3) : 1283-1307. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020078
[8]

Giovanna Bonfanti, Fabio Luterotti. A well-posedness result for irreversible phase transitions with a nonlinear heat flux law. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2013, 6 (2) : 331-351. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2013.6.331
[9]

Tayeb Hadj Kaddour, Michael Reissig. Global well-posedness for effectively damped wave models with nonlinear memory. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2021, 20 (5) : 2039-2064. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2021057
[10]

Xujie Yang. Global well-posedness in a chemotaxis system with oxygen consumption. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2022, 21 (2) : 471-492. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2021184
[11]

M. Keel, Tristan Roy, Terence Tao. Global well-posedness of the Maxwell-Klein-Gordon equation below the energy norm. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2011, 30 (3) : 573-621. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.30.573
[12]

Huafei Di, Yadong Shang, Xiaoxiao Zheng. Global well-posedness for a fourth order pseudo-parabolic equation with memory and source terms. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (3) : 781-801. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016.21.781
[13]

Hartmut Pecher. Almost optimal local well-posedness for the Maxwell-Klein-Gordon system with data in Fourier-Lebesgue spaces. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (6) : 3303-3321. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020146
[14]

Jianjun Yuan. On the well-posedness of Maxwell-Chern-Simons-Higgs system in the Lorenz gauge. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2014, 34 (5) : 2389-2403. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.2389
[15]

Jishan Fan, Yueling Jia. Local well-posedness of the full compressible Navier-Stokes-Maxwell system with vacuum. Kinetic and Related Models, 2018, 11 (1) : 97-106. doi: 10.3934/krm.2018005
[16]

Hartmut Pecher. Improved well-posedness results for the Maxwell-Klein-Gordon system in 2D. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2021, 20 (9) : 2965-2989. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2021091
[17]

Young-Sam Kwon. On the well-posedness of entropy solutions for conservation laws with source terms. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2009, 25 (3) : 933-949. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.25.933
[18]

Thomas Y. Hou, Congming Li. Global well-posedness of the viscous Boussinesq equations. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2005, 12 (1) : 1-12. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2005.12.1
[19]

Shengquan Liu, Jianwen Zhang. Global well-posedness for the two-dimensional equations of nonhomogeneous incompressible liquid crystal flows with nonnegative density. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (8) : 2631-2648. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016065
[20]

Vanessa Barros, Felipe Linares. A remark on the well-posedness of a degenerated Zakharov system. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2015, 14 (4) : 1259-1274. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2015.14.1259

2020 Impact Factor: 1.327

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (251)
  • HTML views (150)
  • Cited by (1)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2022 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences | Privacy Policy