
Previous Article
Coinfection in a stochastic model for bacteriophage systems
 DCDSB Home
 This Issue

Next Article
Cyclicity of $ (1,3) $switching FF type equilibria
Nonlinear decomposition principle and fundamental matrix solutions for dynamic compartmental systems
Department of Mathematics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA 
A decomposition principle for nonlinear dynamic compartmental systems is introduced in the present paper. This theory is based on the mutually exclusive and exhaustive, analytical and dynamic, novel system and subsystem partitioning methodologies. A deterministic mathematical method is developed for the dynamic analysis of nonlinear compartmental systems based on the proposed theory. The dynamic method enables tracking the evolution of all initial stocks, external inputs, and arbitrary intercompartmental flows as well as the associated storages derived from these stocks, inputs, and flows individually and separately within the system. The transient and the dynamic direct, indirect, acyclic, cycling, and transfer ($\texttt{diact}$) flows and associated storages transmitted along a particular flow path or from one compartmentdirectly or indirectlyto any other are then analytically characterized, systematically classified, and mathematically formulated. Thus, the dynamic influence of one compartment, in terms of flow and storage transfer, directly or indirectly on any other compartment is ascertained. Consequently, new mathematical system analysis tools are formulated as quantitative system indicators. The proposed mathematical method is then applied to various models from literature to demonstrate its efficiency and wide applicability.
References:
[1] 
D. Anderson, Compartmental Modeling and Tracer Kinetics, Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, 50. SpringerVerlag, Berlin, 1983. doi: 10.1007/9783642518614. Google Scholar 
[2] 
R. M. Anderson and R. M. May, Population biology of infectious diseases: Part i, Nature, 280 (1979), 361367. doi: 10.1038/280361a0. Google Scholar 
[3] 
H. Coskun, Dynamic ecological system analysis, Heliyon, 5 (2019). Preprint: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/35xkb. Google Scholar 
[4] 
H. Coskun, Dynamic ecological system measures, Results in Applied Mathematics, 2019. Preprint: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/j2pd3. Google Scholar 
[5] 
H. Coskun, Static ecological system analysis, Theoretical Ecology, 2019, 136. Preprint: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/zqxc5. Google Scholar 
[6] 
H. Coskun, Static ecological system measures, Theoretical Ecology, 2019, 126. Preprint: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/g4xzt. Google Scholar 
[7] 
L. EdelsteinKeshet, Mathematical Models in Biology, Classics in Applied Mathematics, 46. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA, 2005. doi: 10.1137/1.9780898719147. Google Scholar 
[8] 
B. Hannon, The structure of ecosystems, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 41 (1973), 535546. Google Scholar 
[9] 
P. W. Hippe, Environ analysis of linear compartmental systems: The dynamic, timeinvariant case, Ecological Modelling, 19 (1983), 126. Google Scholar 
[10] 
J. Jacquez and C. Simon, Qualitative theory of compartmental systems, SIAM Review, 35 (1993), 4379. doi: 10.1137/1035003. Google Scholar 
[11] 
W. O. Kermack and A. G. McKendrick, A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 115 (1927), 700–721, http://rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/115/772/700. Google Scholar 
[12] 
W. W. Leontief, Quantitative input and output relations in the economic systems of the united states, The Review of Economic Statistics, 18 (1936), 105125. Google Scholar 
[13] 
W. W. Leontief, Inputoutput Economics, Oxford University Press on Demand, New York, 1986. Google Scholar 
[14] 
B. C. Patten, Systems approach to the concept of environment, Ohio Journal of Science, 78 (1978), 206222. Google Scholar 
[15] 
J. Szyrmer and R. E. Ulanowicz, Total flows in ecosystems, Ecological Modelling, 35 (1987), 123136. Google Scholar 
[16] 
L. J. Tilly, The structure and dynamics of Cone Spring, Ecological Monographs, 38 (1968), 169197. Google Scholar 
show all references
References:
[1] 
D. Anderson, Compartmental Modeling and Tracer Kinetics, Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, 50. SpringerVerlag, Berlin, 1983. doi: 10.1007/9783642518614. Google Scholar 
[2] 
R. M. Anderson and R. M. May, Population biology of infectious diseases: Part i, Nature, 280 (1979), 361367. doi: 10.1038/280361a0. Google Scholar 
[3] 
H. Coskun, Dynamic ecological system analysis, Heliyon, 5 (2019). Preprint: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/35xkb. Google Scholar 
[4] 
H. Coskun, Dynamic ecological system measures, Results in Applied Mathematics, 2019. Preprint: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/j2pd3. Google Scholar 
[5] 
H. Coskun, Static ecological system analysis, Theoretical Ecology, 2019, 136. Preprint: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/zqxc5. Google Scholar 
[6] 
H. Coskun, Static ecological system measures, Theoretical Ecology, 2019, 126. Preprint: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/g4xzt. Google Scholar 
[7] 
L. EdelsteinKeshet, Mathematical Models in Biology, Classics in Applied Mathematics, 46. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA, 2005. doi: 10.1137/1.9780898719147. Google Scholar 
[8] 
B. Hannon, The structure of ecosystems, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 41 (1973), 535546. Google Scholar 
[9] 
P. W. Hippe, Environ analysis of linear compartmental systems: The dynamic, timeinvariant case, Ecological Modelling, 19 (1983), 126. Google Scholar 
[10] 
J. Jacquez and C. Simon, Qualitative theory of compartmental systems, SIAM Review, 35 (1993), 4379. doi: 10.1137/1035003. Google Scholar 
[11] 
W. O. Kermack and A. G. McKendrick, A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 115 (1927), 700–721, http://rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/115/772/700. Google Scholar 
[12] 
W. W. Leontief, Quantitative input and output relations in the economic systems of the united states, The Review of Economic Statistics, 18 (1936), 105125. Google Scholar 
[13] 
W. W. Leontief, Inputoutput Economics, Oxford University Press on Demand, New York, 1986. Google Scholar 
[14] 
B. C. Patten, Systems approach to the concept of environment, Ohio Journal of Science, 78 (1978), 206222. Google Scholar 
[15] 
J. Szyrmer and R. E. Ulanowicz, Total flows in ecosystems, Ecological Modelling, 35 (1987), 123136. Google Scholar 
[16] 
L. J. Tilly, The structure and dynamics of Cone Spring, Ecological Monographs, 38 (1968), 169197. Google Scholar 
$\texttt{diact}$  flow distribution matrix  flows 
$\texttt{d}$  
$\texttt{i}$  
$\texttt{a}$  
$\texttt{c}$  
$\texttt{t}$ 
$\texttt{diact}$  flow distribution matrix  flows 
$\texttt{d}$  
$\texttt{i}$  
$\texttt{a}$  
$\texttt{c}$  
$\texttt{t}$ 
$\texttt{diact}$  flow and storage distribution matrices  flows  storages  
$\texttt{d}$  

$\texttt{i}$  
$\texttt{a}$  
$\texttt{c}$  
$\texttt{t}$ 
$\texttt{diact}$  flow and storage distribution matrices  flows  storages  
$\texttt{d}$  

$\texttt{i}$  
$\texttt{a}$  
$\texttt{c}$  
$\texttt{t}$ 
[1] 
Felix Finster, Jürg Fröhlich, Marco Oppio, Claudio F. Paganini. Causal fermion systems and the ETH approach to quantum theory. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  S, 2020 doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020451 
[2] 
Sergey Rashkovskiy. HamiltonJacobi theory for Hamiltonian and nonHamiltonian systems. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2020, 12 (4) : 563583. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2020024 
[3] 
Abdelghafour Atlas, Mostafa Bendahmane, Fahd Karami, Driss Meskine, Omar Oubbih. A nonlinear fractional reactiondiffusion system applied to image denoising and decomposition. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  B, 2020 doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020321 
[4] 
PierreEtienne Druet. A theory of generalised solutions for ideal gas mixtures with MaxwellStefan diffusion. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  S, 2020 doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020458 
[5] 
Claudianor O. Alves, Rodrigo C. M. Nemer, Sergio H. Monari Soares. The use of the Morse theory to estimate the number of nontrivial solutions of a nonlinear Schrödinger equation with a magnetic field. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : . doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020276 
[6] 
Peizhao Yu, Guoshan Zhang, Yi Zhang. Decoupling of cubic polynomial matrix systems. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (1) : 1326. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020012 
[7] 
Maoding Zhen, Binlin Zhang, Vicenţiu D. Rădulescu. Normalized solutions for nonlinear coupled fractional systems: Low and high perturbations in the attractive case. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  A, 2020 doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020379 
[8] 
Zedong Yang, Guotao Wang, Ravi P. Agarwal, Haiyong Xu. Existence and nonexistence of entire positive radial solutions for a class of Schrödinger elliptic systems involving a nonlinear operator. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  S, 2020 doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020436 
[9] 
Bahaaeldin Abdalla, Thabet Abdeljawad. Oscillation criteria for kernel function dependent fractional dynamic equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  S, 2020 doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020443 
[10] 
Yuri Fedorov, Božidar Jovanović. Continuous and discrete Neumann systems on Stiefel varieties as matrix generalizations of the Jacobi–Mumford systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  A, 2020 doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020375 
[11] 
Xiyou Cheng, Zhitao Zhang. Structure of positive solutions to a class of Schrödinger systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  S, 2020 doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020461 
[12] 
Chao Xing, Jiaojiao Pan, Hong Luo. Stability and dynamic transition of a toxinproducing phytoplanktonzooplankton model with additional food. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : . doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020275 
[13] 
Haixiang Yao, Ping Chen, Miao Zhang, Xun Li. Dynamic discretetime portfolio selection for defined contribution pension funds with inflation risk. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020166 
[14] 
Awais Younus, Zoubia Dastgeer, Nudrat Ishaq, Abdul Ghaffar, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Devendra Kumar. On the observability of conformable linear timeinvariant control systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  S, 2020 doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020444 
[15] 
Shengxin Zhu, Tongxiang Gu, Xingping Liu. AIMS: Average information matrix splitting. Mathematical Foundations of Computing, 2020, 3 (4) : 301308. doi: 10.3934/mfc.2020012 
[16] 
Hui Lv, Xing'an Wang. Dissipative control for uncertain singular markovian jump systems via hybrid impulsive control. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (1) : 127142. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020020 
[17] 
Xuefeng Zhang, Yingbo Zhang. Faulttolerant control against actuator failures for uncertain singular fractional order systems. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (1) : 112. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020011 
[18] 
Jerry L. Bona, Angel Durán, Dimitrios Mitsotakis. Solitarywave solutions of BenjaminOno and other systems for internal waves. I. approximations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  A, 2021, 41 (1) : 87111. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020215 
[19] 
Ilyasse Lamrani, Imad El Harraki, Ali Boutoulout, FatimaZahrae El Alaoui. Feedback stabilization of bilinear coupled hyperbolic systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  S, 2020 doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020434 
[20] 
Simon Hochgerner. Symmetry actuated closedloop Hamiltonian systems. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2020, 12 (4) : 641669. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2020030 
2019 Impact Factor: 1.27
Tools
Metrics
Other articles
by authors
[Back to Top]