American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019233

Bautin bifurcation in a minimal model of immunoediting

Joaquín Delgado 1,, , Eymard Hernández–López 2,3, and  Lucía Ivonne Hernández–Martínez 2,3,

1. 

Departamento de Matemáticas, UAM-Iztapalapa, Av. San Rafael Atlixco 186, Col. Vicentina, México City, C.P. 09340, México
2. 

Posgrado en Ciencias Naturales e Ingeniería, UAM-Cuajimalpa, Av. Vasco de Quiroga 4871, Col. Santa Fé Cuajimalpa, México City, 05348, México
3. 

Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México, Plantel San Lorenzo Tezonco, Calle Prolongación San Isidro 151, Col. San Lorenzo Tezonco, México City, 09790, México

* Corresponding author: Joaquín Delgado

Received  July 2018 Revised  May 2019 Published  November 2019

Fund Project: Authors were supported by Conacyt grant A1-S-41007, "Bifurcaciones en el estudio de la existencia y estabilidad de EDP". EHL was also supported by a Ph.D. Conacyt grant

One of the simplest model of immune surveillance and neoplasia was proposed by Delisi and Resigno [6]. Later Liu et al [10] proved the existence of non-degenerate Takens-Bogdanov (BT) bifurcations defining a surface in the whole set of five positive parameters. In this paper we prove the existence of Bautin bifurcations completing the scenario of possible codimension two bifurcations that occur in this model. We give an interpretation of our results in terms of the Immuno Edition Theory (IET) of three phases: elimination, equilibrium and escape.

Keywords: Bautin bifurcation, cancer modeling, immunoediting.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 34C23, 34C60; Secondary: 37G15.
Citation: Joaquín Delgado, Eymard Hernández–López, Lucía Ivonne Hernández–Martínez. Bautin bifurcation in a minimal model of immunoediting. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019233
References:
[1]

J. A. Adam, Effects of vascularization on lymphocyte/tumor cell dynamics: Qualitative features, Math. Comput. Modelling, 23 (1996), 1-10.   Google Scholar

[2]

B. Al-Hdaibat, W. Govaerts, Y. A. Kuznetsov and H. G. E. Meijer, Initialization of homoclinic solutions near Bogdanov-Takens points: Lindstedt-Poincaré compared with regular perturbation method, SIAM J. Applied Dynamical Systems, 15 (2016), 952-980.  doi: 10.1137/15M1017491.  Google Scholar

[3]

G. I. Bell, Predator-prey simulating an immune response, Mathematical Biosciences, 16 (1973), 291-314.   Google Scholar

[4]

W.-J. Beyn, Numerical analysis of homoclinic orbits emanating from a Takens-Bogdanov point, IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 14 (1994), 381-410.  doi: 10.1093/imanum/14.3.381.  Google Scholar

[5]

A. R. Champneys and Y. A. Kuznetzov, Numerical detection and continuation of codimension-two homoclinic bifurcation, International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 4 (1994), 785-822.  doi: 10.1142/S0218127494000587.  Google Scholar

[6]

C. DeLisi and A. Rescigno, Immune surveillance and neoplasia-I. A minimal mathematical model, Bull. Math. Bio., 39 (1977), 201-221.  doi: 10.1007/bf02462859.  Google Scholar

[7]

G. P. Dunn, L. J. Old and R. D. Schreiber, The three ES of Cancer Immunoediting, Annual Review of Immunology, 22 (2004), 329-360.   Google Scholar

[8]

R. Kim, M. Emi and K. Tanabe, Cancer immunoediting from immune surveillance to immune escape, Immunology, 21 (2007), 11-14.   Google Scholar

[9]

Y. A. Kuznetsov, Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory, 2nd edition, Applied Mathematical Sciences, 112. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1998.  Google Scholar

[10]

D. Liu, S. G. Ruan and D. M. Zhu, Bifurcation analysis in models of tumor and immune system interactions, Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems series B, 12 (2009), 151-168.  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2009.12.151.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

J. A. Adam, Effects of vascularization on lymphocyte/tumor cell dynamics: Qualitative features, Math. Comput. Modelling, 23 (1996), 1-10.   Google Scholar

[2]

B. Al-Hdaibat, W. Govaerts, Y. A. Kuznetsov and H. G. E. Meijer, Initialization of homoclinic solutions near Bogdanov-Takens points: Lindstedt-Poincaré compared with regular perturbation method, SIAM J. Applied Dynamical Systems, 15 (2016), 952-980.  doi: 10.1137/15M1017491.  Google Scholar

[3]

G. I. Bell, Predator-prey simulating an immune response, Mathematical Biosciences, 16 (1973), 291-314.   Google Scholar

[4]

W.-J. Beyn, Numerical analysis of homoclinic orbits emanating from a Takens-Bogdanov point, IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 14 (1994), 381-410.  doi: 10.1093/imanum/14.3.381.  Google Scholar

[5]

A. R. Champneys and Y. A. Kuznetzov, Numerical detection and continuation of codimension-two homoclinic bifurcation, International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 4 (1994), 785-822.  doi: 10.1142/S0218127494000587.  Google Scholar

[6]

C. DeLisi and A. Rescigno, Immune surveillance and neoplasia-I. A minimal mathematical model, Bull. Math. Bio., 39 (1977), 201-221.  doi: 10.1007/bf02462859.  Google Scholar

[7]

G. P. Dunn, L. J. Old and R. D. Schreiber, The three ES of Cancer Immunoediting, Annual Review of Immunology, 22 (2004), 329-360.   Google Scholar

[8]

R. Kim, M. Emi and K. Tanabe, Cancer immunoediting from immune surveillance to immune escape, Immunology, 21 (2007), 11-14.   Google Scholar

[9]

Y. A. Kuznetsov, Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory, 2nd edition, Applied Mathematical Sciences, 112. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1998.  Google Scholar

[10]

D. Liu, S. G. Ruan and D. M. Zhu, Bifurcation analysis in models of tumor and immune system interactions, Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems series B, 12 (2009), 151-168.  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2009.12.151.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  The catastrophe surface in coordinates $ (\psi, x_c, x_0) $, where $ x_0 $ is the abscissa of the critical point. For a given value of $ (\psi,x_c) $ there are up to two critical points with $ x_0>0 $ and the trivial critical point corresponding to $ x_0 = 0 $. Notice that there are critical points with $ x_0<0 $ that are not considered. The folding of the surface projects into the saddle–node curve given by (10) in the plane $ \psi $–$ x_c $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3.  Schema of the bifurcation diagram computed numerically in Figure 10-b. The codes of the lines are as follows: SS (blue) symmetric–saddle; H (green) Hopf; SN (black dotted) saddle–node; LPC (red) limit point of cycles; Hom (magenta) homoclinic. Special points are BT(Takens–Bogdanov) and GH(Bautin)
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2.  Local diagram of Bautin bifurcacion
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 10.  Numerical continuation of bifurcation diagram with MatCont. Saddle-node: black; Hopf: green; limit point of cycles: red; symmetric saddles: blue; homoclinic: violet
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4.  Qualitative phase portrait along the line $ CKDPAT $ of the bifurcation scheme in Figure 3
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 5.  Qualitative phase portrait along the line $ C'K'D'P'A'T' $ of the bifurcation scheme in Figure 3. The phase portrait along the segment $ C'K'D'P'A' $ is the same as $ CKPDA $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 6.  Qualitative phase portrait along the line $ C''K''D''P''A''T'' $ of the bifurcation scheme in Figure 3
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 7.  Coexistence of two limit cycles along the line $ C'T' $: (a), (c) and (b). Along the line $ C''T'' $: (b), (d) and (f)
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 9.  Ilustration of Proposition 3
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 8.  Graphs of coexisting limit cycles of Figure 7. Stable in blue, unstable in red
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Table 1.  Parameters value of system (1), [6], [10]
Parameter-Definition Dimension Value Scaled
$ \lambda_{1} $: Lymphocyte growth rate $ \frac{1}{day} $ $ 0.01 $ $ 0.01 $
$ \lambda_{2} $: Death rate of cancer cells $ \frac{1}{day} $ $ 0.020016 $ $ 0.006672 $
$ \alpha_{1} $: Rate of interaction $ \frac{1}{day} $ $ 1.5 \times 10^{-7} $ $ 0.297312 $
$ \alpha_{2} $: Rate of interaction $ \frac{1}{day} $ $ 4.6135 \times 10^{-9} $ $ 0.00318 $
$ x_{c} $: Saturation level $ volume $ $ 2.5 \times 10^{11} $ $ 2500 $
Table Options

Download as excel

Parameter-Definition Dimension Value Scaled
$ \lambda_{1} $: Lymphocyte growth rate $ \frac{1}{day} $ $ 0.01 $ $ 0.01 $
$ \lambda_{2} $: Death rate of cancer cells $ \frac{1}{day} $ $ 0.020016 $ $ 0.006672 $
$ \alpha_{1} $: Rate of interaction $ \frac{1}{day} $ $ 1.5 \times 10^{-7} $ $ 0.297312 $
$ \alpha_{2} $: Rate of interaction $ \frac{1}{day} $ $ 4.6135 \times 10^{-9} $ $ 0.00318 $
$ x_{c} $: Saturation level $ volume $ $ 2.5 \times 10^{11} $ $ 2500 $
[1]

Yuxiao Guo, Ben Niu. Bautin bifurcation in delayed reaction-diffusion systems with application to the segel-jackson model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (11) : 6005-6024. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019118
[2]

Amina Eladdadi, Noura Yousfi, Abdessamad Tridane. Preface: Special issue on cancer modeling, analysis and control. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2013, 18 (4) : i-iii. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.4i
[3]

Cristian Tomasetti, Doron Levy. An elementary approach to modeling drug resistance in cancer. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2010, 7 (4) : 905-918. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2010.7.905
[4]

Alacia M. Voth, John G. Alford, Edward W. Swim. Mathematical modeling of continuous and intermittent androgen suppression for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2017, 14 (3) : 777-804. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017043
[5]

Harsh Vardhan Jain, Avner Friedman. Modeling prostate cancer response to continuous versus intermittent androgen ablation therapy. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2013, 18 (4) : 945-967. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.945
[6]

Jie Lou, Tommaso Ruggeri, Claudio Tebaldi. Modeling Cancer in HIV-1 Infected Individuals: Equilibria, Cycles and Chaotic Behavior. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2006, 3 (2) : 313-324. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2006.3.313
[7]

Julia M. Kroos, Christian Stinner, Christina Surulescu, Nico Surulescu. SDE-driven modeling of phenotypically heterogeneous tumors: The influence of cancer cell stemness. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (8) : 4629-4663. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019157
[8]

Junde Wu. Bifurcation for a free boundary problem modeling the growth of necrotic multilayered tumors. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2019, 39 (6) : 3399-3411. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019140
[9]

Fengqi Yi, Hua Zhang, Alhaji Cherif, Wenying Zhang. Spatiotemporal patterns of a homogeneous diffusive system modeling hair growth: Global asymptotic behavior and multiple bifurcation analysis. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2014, 13 (1) : 347-369. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2014.13.347
[10]

Jean Dolbeault, Robert Stańczy. Bifurcation diagrams and multiplicity for nonlocal elliptic equations modeling gravitating systems based on Fermi--Dirac statistics. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2015, 35 (1) : 139-154. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.139
[11]

Tiffany A. Jones, Lou Caccetta, Volker Rehbock. Optimisation modelling of cancer growth. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (1) : 115-123. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017006
[12]

Christoph Sadée, Eugene Kashdan. A model of thermotherapy treatment for bladder cancer. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2016, 13 (6) : 1169-1183. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2016037
[13]

Avner Friedman. A hierarchy of cancer models and their mathematical challenges. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2004, 4 (1) : 147-159. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2004.4.147
[14]

Patrick M. Fitzpatrick, Jacobo Pejsachowicz. Branching and bifurcation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2019, 12 (7) : 1955-1975. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2019127
[15]

Urszula Ledzewicz, Heinz Schättler. Drug resistance in cancer chemotherapy as an optimal control problem. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2006, 6 (1) : 129-150. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2006.6.129
[16]

John D. Nagy, Dieter Armbruster. Evolution of uncontrolled proliferation and the angiogenic switch in cancer. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2012, 9 (4) : 843-876. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2012.9.843
[17]

Mingxing Zhou, Jing Liu, Shuai Wang, Shan He. A comparative study of robustness measures for cancer signaling networks. Big Data & Information Analytics, 2017, 2 (1) : 87-96. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2017011
[18]

Urszula Ledzewicz, Heinz Schättler. Controlling a model for bone marrow dynamics in cancer chemotherapy. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2004, 1 (1) : 95-110. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2004.1.95
[19]

Britnee Crawford, Christopher M. Kribs-Zaleta. The impact of vaccination and coinfection on HPV and cervical cancer. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2009, 12 (2) : 279-304. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2009.12.279
[20]

Yangjin Kim, Avner Friedman, Eugene Kashdan, Urszula Ledzewicz, Chae-Ok Yun. Application of ecological and mathematical theory to cancer: New challenges. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2015, 12 (6) : i-iv. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2015.12.6i

2018 Impact Factor: 1.008

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (11)
  • HTML views (26)
  • Cited by (0)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2019 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences