American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
February  2021, 26(2): 1149-1170. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020157

Global dynamics in a tumor-immune model with an immune checkpoint inhibitor

Shujing Shi 1, , Jicai Huang 1,, and  Yang Kuang 2,

1. 

School of Mathematics and Statistics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
2. 

School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA

* Corresponding author: Jicai Huang

Received  August 2019 Revised  February 2020 Published  February 2021 Early access  May 2020

Fund Project: Research of JH and SS was partially supported by NSFC (No. 11871235) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (CCNU19TS030). Research of YK is partially supported by NSF grants DMS-1615879, DEB-1930728 and an NIH grant 5R01GM131405-02

In this paper, we fill several key gaps in the study of the global dynamics of a highly nonlinear tumor-immune model with an immune checkpoint inhibitor proposed by Nikolopoulou et al. (Letters in Biomathematics, 5 (2018), S137-S159). For this tumour-immune interaction model, it is known that the model has a unique tumour-free equilibrium and at most two tumorous equilibria. We present sufficient and necessary conditions for the global stability of the tumour-free equilibrium or the unique tumorous equilibrium. The global dynamics is obtained by employing a new Dulac function to establish the nonexistence of nontrivial positive periodic orbits. Our analysis shows that we can almost completely classify the global dynamics of the model with two critical values $ C_{K0}, C_{K1} (C_{K0}>C_{K1}) $ for the carrying capacity $ C_K $ of tumour cells and one critical value $ d_{T0} $ for the death rate $ d_{T} $ of T cells. Specifically, the following are true. (ⅰ) When no tumorous equilibrium exists, the tumour-free equilibrium is globally asymptotically stable. (ⅱ) When $ C_K \leq C_{K1} $ and $ d_T>d_{T0} $, the unique tumorous equilibrium is globally asymptotically stable. (ⅲ) When $ C_K >C_{K1} $, the model exhibits saddle-node bifurcation of tumorous equilibria. In this case, we show that when a unique tumorous equilibrium exists, tumor cells can persist for all positive initial densities, or can be eliminated for some initial densities and persist for other initial densities. When two distinct tumorous equilibria exist, we show that the model exhibits bistable phenomenon, and tumor cells have alternative fates depending on the positive initial densities. (ⅳ) When $ C_K > C_{K0} $ and $ d_T = d_{T0} $, or $ d_T>d_{T0} $, tumor cells will persist for all positive initial densities.

Keywords: Tumor-immune model, Immunotherapy, Saddle-node bifurcation, Global stability, Bistability, Persistence.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 34D23, 34C23; Secondary: 92B05.
Citation: Shujing Shi, Jicai Huang, Yang Kuang. Global dynamics in a tumor-immune model with an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (2) : 1149-1170. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020157
References:
[1]

M. E. Alexander and S. M. Moghadas, Periodicity in an epidemic model with a generalized non-linear incidence, Math. Biosci., 189 (2004), 75-96.  doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2004.01.003.  Google Scholar

[2]

R. FitzHugh, Mathematical models of threshold phenomena in the nerve membrane, Bull. Math. Biophysics, 17 (1955), 257-278.  doi: 10.1007/BF02477753.  Google Scholar

[3]

J. Hamanishi, M. Mandai, N. Matsumura, K. Abiko, T. Baba and I. Konishi, PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in cancer treatment: Perspectives and issues, Int. J. Clin. Oncol., 21 (2016), 462-473.  doi: 10.1007/s10147-016-0959-z.  Google Scholar

[4]

S.-B. Hsu, T. W. Hwang and Y. Kuang, Global analysis of the Michaelis-Menten-type ratio-dependent predator-prey system, J. Math. Biol., 42 (2001), 489-506.  doi: 10.1007/s002850100079.  Google Scholar

[5]

J. Huang, Y. Gong and S. Ruan, Bifurcation analysis in a predator-prey model with constant-yield predator harvesting, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B, 18 (2013), 2101-2121.  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.2101.  Google Scholar

[6]

J. Huang, S. Ruan and J. Song, Bifurcaitons in a predator-prey system of Leslie type with generalized Holling type Ⅲ functional response, J. Diff. Equat., 257 (2014), 1721-1752.  doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2014.04.024.  Google Scholar

[7]

W. O. Kermack and A. G. McKendrick, A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 115 (1927), 700-721.   Google Scholar

[8]

Y. Kuang and E. Beretta, Global qualitative analysis of a ratio-dependent predator-prey system, J. Math. Biol., 36 (1998), 389-406.  doi: 10.1007/s002850050105.  Google Scholar

[9]

Y. Kuang, J. D. Nagy and S. E. Eikenberry, Introduction to Mathematical Oncology, Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2016.  Google Scholar

[10]

X. Lai and A. Friedman, Combination therapy of cancer with cancer vaccine and immune checkpoint inhibitors: A mathematical model, PLoS ONE, 12 (2017), 1-24.   Google Scholar

[11]

M. Lu, J. Huang, S. Ruan and P. Yu, Bifurcation analysis of an SIRS epidemic model with a generalized nonmonotone and saturated incidence rate, J. Diff. Equat., 267 (2019), 1859-1898.  doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2019.03.005.  Google Scholar

[12]

K. M. Mahoney, G. J. Freeman and D. F. McDermott, The next immune-checkpoint inhibitors: PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in melanoma, Clin. Ther., 37 (2015), 764-782.  doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.02.018.  Google Scholar

[13]

M. Mazel, W. Jacot, K. Pantel, K. Bartkowiak, D. Topart, L. Cayrefourcq and C. Alix-Panabières, Frequent expression of PD-L1 on circulating breast cancer cells, Mol. Oncol., 9 (2015), 1773-1782.  doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2015.05.009.  Google Scholar

[14]

E. Nikolopoulou, L. R. Johnson, D. Harris, J. D. Nagy, E. C. Stites and Y. Kuang, Tumour-immune dynamics with an immune checkpoint inhibitor, Lett. Biomath., 5 (2018), S137–S159. doi: 10.1080/23737867.2018.1440978.  Google Scholar

[15]

E. Nikolopoulou, S. E. Eikenberry, J. L. Gevertz and Y. Kuang, Mathematical modeling of an immune checkpoint inhibitor and its synergy with an immunostimulant, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B, (2020), in press. Google Scholar

[16]

P. A. Ott, F. S. Hodi, H. L. Kaufman, J. M. Wigginton and J. D. Wolchok, Combination immunotherapy: A road map, J. Immunother. Cancer., 5 (2017), 16-30.  doi: 10.1186/s40425-017-0218-5.  Google Scholar

[17]

L. Perko, Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems, 3$^{rd}$ edition, Springer, New York, 2001. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-0003-8.  Google Scholar

[18]

S. A. Patel and A. J. Minn, Combination Cancer Therapy with Immune Checkpoint Blockade: Mechanisms and Strategies, Immunity, 48 (2018), 417-433.  doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.03.007.  Google Scholar

[19]

M. L. Rosenzweig and R. H. MacArthur, Graphical representation and stability conditions of predator-prey interactions, American Naturalist, 97 (1963), 209-223.  doi: 10.1086/282272.  Google Scholar

[20] H. L. Smith and P. Waltman, The Theory of the Chemostat: Dynamics of Microbial Competition, Cambridge university press, 1995.  doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511530043.  Google Scholar
[21]

M. Swart, I. Verbrugge and J. B. Beltman, Combination approaches with immune-checkpoint blockade in cancer therapy, Front. Oncol., 6 (2016), 233-248.  doi: 10.3389/fonc.2016.00233.  Google Scholar

[22]

Suzanne L. Topalian, F. S. Hodi, J. R. Brahmer, S. N. Gettinger, D. C. Smith, D. F. McDermott, ... and P. D. Leming, Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer, N. Engl. J. Med., 366 (2012), 2443–2454. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1200690.  Google Scholar

[23]

O. Talay, C. H. Shen, L. Chen and J. Chen, B7-H1 (PD-L1) on T cells is required for T-cell-mediated conditioning of dendritic cell maturation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 106 (2009), 2741-2746.  doi: 10.1073/pnas.0813367106.  Google Scholar

[24]

H. Wimberly, J. R. Brown, K. Schalper, H. Haack, M. R. Silver, C. Nixon and D. L. Rimm, PD-L1 expression correlates with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer, Cancer Immunol. Res., 3 (2015), 326-332.  doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-14-0133.  Google Scholar

[25]

D. Xiao and S. Ruan, Global analysis of an epidemic model with nonmonotone incidence rate, Math. Biosci., 208 (2007), 419–429. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2006.09.025.  Google Scholar

[26]

Z. Zhang, T. Ding, W. Huang and Z. Dong, Qualitative Theory of Differential Equation, Transl. Math. Monogr., 101, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1992.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

M. E. Alexander and S. M. Moghadas, Periodicity in an epidemic model with a generalized non-linear incidence, Math. Biosci., 189 (2004), 75-96.  doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2004.01.003.  Google Scholar

[2]

R. FitzHugh, Mathematical models of threshold phenomena in the nerve membrane, Bull. Math. Biophysics, 17 (1955), 257-278.  doi: 10.1007/BF02477753.  Google Scholar

[3]

J. Hamanishi, M. Mandai, N. Matsumura, K. Abiko, T. Baba and I. Konishi, PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in cancer treatment: Perspectives and issues, Int. J. Clin. Oncol., 21 (2016), 462-473.  doi: 10.1007/s10147-016-0959-z.  Google Scholar

[4]

S.-B. Hsu, T. W. Hwang and Y. Kuang, Global analysis of the Michaelis-Menten-type ratio-dependent predator-prey system, J. Math. Biol., 42 (2001), 489-506.  doi: 10.1007/s002850100079.  Google Scholar

[5]

J. Huang, Y. Gong and S. Ruan, Bifurcation analysis in a predator-prey model with constant-yield predator harvesting, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B, 18 (2013), 2101-2121.  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.2101.  Google Scholar

[6]

J. Huang, S. Ruan and J. Song, Bifurcaitons in a predator-prey system of Leslie type with generalized Holling type Ⅲ functional response, J. Diff. Equat., 257 (2014), 1721-1752.  doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2014.04.024.  Google Scholar

[7]

W. O. Kermack and A. G. McKendrick, A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 115 (1927), 700-721.   Google Scholar

[8]

Y. Kuang and E. Beretta, Global qualitative analysis of a ratio-dependent predator-prey system, J. Math. Biol., 36 (1998), 389-406.  doi: 10.1007/s002850050105.  Google Scholar

[9]

Y. Kuang, J. D. Nagy and S. E. Eikenberry, Introduction to Mathematical Oncology, Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2016.  Google Scholar

[10]

X. Lai and A. Friedman, Combination therapy of cancer with cancer vaccine and immune checkpoint inhibitors: A mathematical model, PLoS ONE, 12 (2017), 1-24.   Google Scholar

[11]

M. Lu, J. Huang, S. Ruan and P. Yu, Bifurcation analysis of an SIRS epidemic model with a generalized nonmonotone and saturated incidence rate, J. Diff. Equat., 267 (2019), 1859-1898.  doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2019.03.005.  Google Scholar

[12]

K. M. Mahoney, G. J. Freeman and D. F. McDermott, The next immune-checkpoint inhibitors: PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in melanoma, Clin. Ther., 37 (2015), 764-782.  doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.02.018.  Google Scholar

[13]

M. Mazel, W. Jacot, K. Pantel, K. Bartkowiak, D. Topart, L. Cayrefourcq and C. Alix-Panabières, Frequent expression of PD-L1 on circulating breast cancer cells, Mol. Oncol., 9 (2015), 1773-1782.  doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2015.05.009.  Google Scholar

[14]

E. Nikolopoulou, L. R. Johnson, D. Harris, J. D. Nagy, E. C. Stites and Y. Kuang, Tumour-immune dynamics with an immune checkpoint inhibitor, Lett. Biomath., 5 (2018), S137–S159. doi: 10.1080/23737867.2018.1440978.  Google Scholar

[15]

E. Nikolopoulou, S. E. Eikenberry, J. L. Gevertz and Y. Kuang, Mathematical modeling of an immune checkpoint inhibitor and its synergy with an immunostimulant, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B, (2020), in press. Google Scholar

[16]

P. A. Ott, F. S. Hodi, H. L. Kaufman, J. M. Wigginton and J. D. Wolchok, Combination immunotherapy: A road map, J. Immunother. Cancer., 5 (2017), 16-30.  doi: 10.1186/s40425-017-0218-5.  Google Scholar

[17]

L. Perko, Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems, 3$^{rd}$ edition, Springer, New York, 2001. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-0003-8.  Google Scholar

[18]

S. A. Patel and A. J. Minn, Combination Cancer Therapy with Immune Checkpoint Blockade: Mechanisms and Strategies, Immunity, 48 (2018), 417-433.  doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.03.007.  Google Scholar

[19]

M. L. Rosenzweig and R. H. MacArthur, Graphical representation and stability conditions of predator-prey interactions, American Naturalist, 97 (1963), 209-223.  doi: 10.1086/282272.  Google Scholar

[20] H. L. Smith and P. Waltman, The Theory of the Chemostat: Dynamics of Microbial Competition, Cambridge university press, 1995.  doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511530043.  Google Scholar
[21]

M. Swart, I. Verbrugge and J. B. Beltman, Combination approaches with immune-checkpoint blockade in cancer therapy, Front. Oncol., 6 (2016), 233-248.  doi: 10.3389/fonc.2016.00233.  Google Scholar

[22]

Suzanne L. Topalian, F. S. Hodi, J. R. Brahmer, S. N. Gettinger, D. C. Smith, D. F. McDermott, ... and P. D. Leming, Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer, N. Engl. J. Med., 366 (2012), 2443–2454. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1200690.  Google Scholar

[23]

O. Talay, C. H. Shen, L. Chen and J. Chen, B7-H1 (PD-L1) on T cells is required for T-cell-mediated conditioning of dendritic cell maturation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 106 (2009), 2741-2746.  doi: 10.1073/pnas.0813367106.  Google Scholar

[24]

H. Wimberly, J. R. Brown, K. Schalper, H. Haack, M. R. Silver, C. Nixon and D. L. Rimm, PD-L1 expression correlates with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer, Cancer Immunol. Res., 3 (2015), 326-332.  doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-14-0133.  Google Scholar

[25]

D. Xiao and S. Ruan, Global analysis of an epidemic model with nonmonotone incidence rate, Math. Biosci., 208 (2007), 419–429. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2006.09.025.  Google Scholar

[26]

Z. Zhang, T. Ding, W. Huang and Z. Dong, Qualitative Theory of Differential Equation, Transl. Math. Monogr., 101, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1992.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  A unique positive root $ y_0 $ of $ G_1(y) = 0 $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2.  A unique boundary equilibrium $ E_0 $ which is (a) hyperbolic saddle if $ b<(c+1)e-a $; (b) stable hyperbolic node if $ b>(c+1)e-a $; (c) saddle-node with a stable parabolic sector in the right half plane if $ b = (c+1)e-a $ and $ d< 2c+\frac{a}{e} $; (d) saddle-node with a stable parabolic sector in the left half plane if $ b = (c+1)e-a $ and $ d>2c+\frac{a}{e} $; (e) stable degenerate node if $ b = (c+1)e-a $ and $ d = 2c+\frac{a}{e} $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3.  The positive roots of $ G_2(y) = 0 $ when $ d>c $: (a) no positive root; (b) one double positive root $ y_1 $; (c) two simple positive roots $ y_2 $ and $ y_3 $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4.  The phase portraits of system $ (3) $ with no positive equilibrium when $ d>c $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 5.  The phase portraits of system $ (3) $ with a unique positive equilibrium $ E_1 $ which is a saddle-node when $ d>c $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 6.  The phase portraits of system $ (3) $ with two distinct positive equilibria: a hyperbolic saddle $ E_3 $ and a stable hyperbolic node $ E_2 $ when $ d>c $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 7.  The positive root of $ G_2(y) = 0 $. (a) $ d<c $; (b) $ d = c $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 8.  The tumour-free equilibrium is globally asymptotically stable when $ C_K>C_{K1} $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 9.  The unique tumorous equilibrium is globally asymptotically stable when $ C_K>C_{K1} $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 10.  Two tumorous equilibria and bistable phenomenon when $ C_K>C_{K1} $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

[1]

Rui Dilão, András Volford. Excitability in a model with a saddle-node homoclinic bifurcation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2004, 4 (2) : 419-434. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2004.4.419
[2]

Ping Liu, Junping Shi, Yuwen Wang. A double saddle-node bifurcation theorem. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2013, 12 (6) : 2923-2933. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2013.12.2923
[3]

Gladis Torres-Espino, Claudio Vidal. Periodic solutions of a tumor-immune system interaction under a periodic immunotherapy. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (8) : 4523-4547. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020301
[4]

Flaviano Battelli. Saddle-node bifurcation of homoclinic orbits in singular systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2001, 7 (1) : 203-218. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2001.7.203
[5]

Denise E. Kirschner, Alexei Tsygvintsev. On the global dynamics of a model for tumor immunotherapy. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2009, 6 (3) : 573-583. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2009.6.573
[6]

Giulio Caravagna, Alex Graudenzi, Alberto d’Onofrio. Distributed delays in a hybrid model of tumor-Immune system interplay. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2013, 10 (1) : 37-57. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.37
[7]

J.C. Arciero, T.L. Jackson, D.E. Kirschner. A mathematical model of tumor-immune evasion and siRNA treatment. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2004, 4 (1) : 39-58. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2004.4.39
[8]

Mohammad A. Tabatabai, Wayne M. Eby, Karan P. Singh, Sejong Bae. T model of growth and its application in systems of tumor-immune dynamics. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2013, 10 (3) : 925-938. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.925
[9]

Lifeng Han, Changhan He, Yang Kuang. Dynamics of a model of tumor-immune interaction with time delay and noise. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020, 13 (9) : 2347-2363. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020140
[10]

Sophia R-J Jang, Hsiu-Chuan Wei. On a mathematical model of tumor-immune system interactions with an oncolytic virus therapy. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021184
[11]

Kie Van Ivanky Saputra, Lennaert van Veen, Gilles Reinout Willem Quispel. The saddle-node-transcritical bifurcation in a population model with constant rate harvesting. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 14 (1) : 233-250. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.14.233
[12]

Urszula Ledzewicz, Mozhdeh Sadat Faraji Mosalman, Heinz Schättler. Optimal controls for a mathematical model of tumor-immune interactions under targeted chemotherapy with immune boost. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2013, 18 (4) : 1031-1051. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.1031
[13]

Victoriano Carmona, Soledad Fernández-García, Antonio E. Teruel. Saddle-node of limit cycles in planar piecewise linear systems and applications. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2019, 39 (9) : 5275-5299. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019215
[14]

Ale Jan Homburg, Todd Young. Intermittency and Jakobson's theorem near saddle-node bifurcations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2007, 17 (1) : 21-58. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2007.17.21
[15]

W.-J. Beyn, Y.-K Zou. Discretizations of dynamical systems with a saddle-node homoclinic orbit. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1996, 2 (3) : 351-365. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1996.2.351
[16]

Xiao-Biao Lin, Changrong Zhu. Saddle-node bifurcations of multiple homoclinic solutions in ODES. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (4) : 1435-1460. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017069
[17]

Min Yu, Gang Huang, Yueping Dong, Yasuhiro Takeuchi. Complicated dynamics of tumor-immune system interaction model with distributed time delay. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020, 25 (7) : 2391-2406. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020015
[18]

Urszula Ledzewicz, Omeiza Olumoye, Heinz Schättler. On optimal chemotherapy with a strongly targeted agent for a model of tumor-immune system interactions with generalized logistic growth. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2013, 10 (3) : 787-802. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.787
[19]

Majid Gazor, Mojtaba Moazeni. Parametric normal forms for Bogdanov--Takens singularity; the generalized saddle-node case. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2015, 35 (1) : 205-224. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.205
[20]

Urszula Ledzewicz, Mohammad Naghnaeian, Heinz Schättler. Dynamics of tumor-immune interaction under treatment as an optimal control problem. Conference Publications, 2011, 2011 (Special) : 971-980. doi: 10.3934/proc.2011.2011.971

2020 Impact Factor: 1.327

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (276)
  • HTML views (291)
  • Cited by (0)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2021 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences