American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020213

On the role of pharmacometrics in mathematical models for cancer treatments

Urszula Ledzewicz 1,2,, and  Heinz Schättler 3,

1. 

Institute of Mathematics, Lodz University of Technology, 90-924 Lodz, Poland
2. 

Dept. of Mathematics and Statistics, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, Il, 62026-1653, USA
3. 

Dept. of Electrical and Systems Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, Mo, 63130, USA

* Corresponding author: Urszula Ledzewicz

Received  April 2020 Revised  April 2020 Published  July 2020

We review and discuss various aspects that the modeling of pharmacometric properties has on the structure of optimal solutions in mathematical models for cancer treatment. These include (i) the changes in the interpretation of the solutions as pharmacokinetic (PK) models are added, respectively deleted from the modeling and (ii) qualitative changes in the structures of optimal controls that occur as pharmacodynamic (PD) models are varied. The results will be illustrated with a sample of models for cancer treatment.

Keywords: optimal control, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, cancer treatment, singular controls.
Mathematics Subject Classification: primary: 92C50, 49K15, secondary: 93C15.
Citation: Urszula Ledzewicz, Heinz Schättler. On the role of pharmacometrics in mathematical models for cancer treatments. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020213
References:
[1]

B. Bonnard and M. Chyba, Singular Trajectories and their Role in Control Theory, Mathématiques & Applications, vol. 40, Springer Verlag, Paris, 2003.  Google Scholar

[2]

A. Bressan and B. Piccoli, Introduction to the Mathematical Theory of Control, American Institute of Mathematical Sciences, 2007.  Google Scholar

[3]

C. S. Chou and A. Friedman, Introduction to Mathematical Biology - Modeling, Analysis and Simulation, Springer Verlag, 2016. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-29638-8.  Google Scholar

[4]

M. Eisen, Mathematical Models in Cell Biology and Cancer Chemotherapy, Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, Vol. 30, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1979.  Google Scholar

[5]

L. A. Fernández and C. Pola, Optimal control problems for the Gompertz model under the Norton-Simon hypothesis in chemotherapy, Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, Series B, 24 (2019), 2577-2612.  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018266.  Google Scholar

[6]

P. Hahnfeldt, D. Panigrahy, J. Folkman and L. Hlatky, Tumor development under angiogenic signaling: A dynamical theory of tumor growth, treatment response, and postvascular dormancy, Cancer Research, 59 (1999), 4770-4775.   Google Scholar

[7]

A. Källén, Computational Pharmacokinetics, Chapman and Hall, CRC, London, 2007. Google Scholar

[8]

H. Khalil, Nonlinear Systems, 3rd ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2002. Google Scholar

[9]

M. Kimmel and A. Swierniak, An optimal control problem related to leukemia chemotherapy, Scientific Bulletins of the Silesian Technical University, 65, (1983), 120–130. Google Scholar

[10]

U. Ledzewicz, H. Maurer and H. Schättler, Minimizing tumor volume for a mathematical model of anti-angiogenesis with linear pharmacokinetics, in: Recent Advances in Optimization and its Applications in Engineering, M. Diehl, F. Glineur, E. Jarlebring and W. Michiels, Eds., (2010), 267–276. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-12598-0_23.  Google Scholar

[11]

U. Ledzewicz, H. Maurer and H. Schättler, Optimal and suboptimal protocols for a mathematical model for tumor anti-angiogenesis in combination with chemotherapy, Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 8 (2011), 307-323.  doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.307.  Google Scholar

[12]

U. Ledzewicz and H. Moore, Dynamical systems properties of a mathematical model for the treatment of CML, Applied Sciences, 6 (2016), 291. doi: 10.3390/app6100291.  Google Scholar

[13]

U. Ledzewicz and H. Moore, Optimal control applied to a generalized Michaelis-Menten model of CML therapy, Dicrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, Series B, 23 (2018), 331-346.  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018022.  Google Scholar

[14]

U. Ledzewicz and H. Schättler, Controlling a model for bone marrow dynamics in cancer chemotherapy, Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 1 (2004), 95-110.  doi: 10.3934/mbe.2004.1.95.  Google Scholar

[15]

U. Ledzewicz and H. Schättler, Optimal bang-bang controls for a 2-compartment model in cancer chemotherapy, J. of Optimization Theory and Applications - JOTA, 114 (2002), 609-637.  doi: 10.1023/A:1016027113579.  Google Scholar

[16]

U. Ledzewicz and H. Schättler, The influence of PK/PD on the structure of optimal control in cancer chemotherapy models, Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering (MBE), 2 (2005), 561-578.  doi: 10.3934/mbe.2005.2.561.  Google Scholar

[17]

U. Ledzewicz and H. Schättler, Antiangiogenic therapy in cancer treatment as an optimal control problem, SIAM J. on Control and Optimization, 46 (2007), 1052-1079.  doi: 10.1137/060665294.  Google Scholar

[18]

U. Ledzewicz and H. Schättler, Optimal and suboptimal protocols for a class of mathematical models of tumor anti-angiogenesis, J. of Theoretical Biology, 252 (2008), 295-312.  doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.02.014.  Google Scholar

[19]

U. Ledzewicz and H. Schättler, Singular controls and chattering arcs in optimal control problems arising in biomedicine, Control and Cybernetics, 38 (2009), 1501-1523.   Google Scholar

[20]

M. Leszczyński, E. Ratajczyk, U. Ledzewicz and H. Schättler, Sufficient conditions for optimality for a mathematical model of drug treatment with pharmacodynamics, Opuscula Mathematica, 37 (2017), 403-419.  doi: 10.7494/OpMath.2017.37.3.403.  Google Scholar

[21]

M. Leszczyński, U. Ledzewicz and H. Schättler, Optimal control for a mathematical model for anti-angiogenic treatment with Michaelis-Menten pharmacodynamics, Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, Series B, 24 (2019), 2315-2334.  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019097.  Google Scholar

[22]

M. Leszczyński, U. Ledzewicz and H. Schättler, Optimal control for a mathematical model for chemotherapy with pharmacometrics, Mathematical Modelling of Natural Phenomena, 2020. doi: 10.1051/mmnp/2020008.  Google Scholar

[23]

H. Moore, U. Ledzewicz and L. Strauss, Optimization of combination therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia with dosing constraints, J. of Mathematical Biology, 77 (2018), 1533-1561.  doi: 10.1007/s00285-018-1262-6.  Google Scholar

[24]

A. d'Onofrio, U. Ledzewicz, H. Maurer and H. Schättler, On optimal delivery of combination therapy for tumors, Mathematical Biosciences, 222, (2009), 13–26. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2009.08.004.  Google Scholar

[25]

P. Macheras and A. Iliadin, Modeling in Biopharmaceutics, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics, Vol. 30, 2nd ed., Springer, New York, 2016. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-27598-7.  Google Scholar

[26] R. Martin and K. L. Teo, Optimal Control of Drug Administration in Cancer Chemotherapy, World Scientific Press, ingapore, 1994.  doi: 10.1142/2048.  Google Scholar
[27]

L. G. de Pillis and A. Radunskaya, A mathematical tumor model with immune resistance and drug therapy: An optimal control approach, J. of Theoretical Medicine, 3 (2001), 79-100.   Google Scholar

[28]

L. S. Pontryagin, V. G. Boltyanskii, R. V. Gamkrelidze and E. F. Mishchenko, The Mathematical Theory of Optimal Processes, Macmillan, New York, 1964.  Google Scholar

[29]

M. Rowland and T.N. Tozer, Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Wolters Kluwer Lippicott, Philadelphia, 1995. Google Scholar

[30]

H. Schättler and U. Ledzewicz, Geometric Optimal Control, Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics, vol. 38, Springer, 2012. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3834-2.  Google Scholar

[31]

H. Schättler and U. Ledzewicz, Optimal Control for Mathematical Models of Cancer Therapies, Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics, vol. 42, Springer, 2015. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2972-6.  Google Scholar

[32]

H. Schättler, U. Ledzewicz and H. Maurer, Sufficient conditions for strong locak optimality in optimal control problems with $L_2$-type objectives and control constraints, Dicrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, Series B, 19 (2014), 2657-2679.  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.2657.  Google Scholar

[33]

S. Shimoda, K. Nishida, M. Sakakida, Y. Konno, K. Ichinose, M. Uehara, T. Nowak and M. Shichiri, Closed-loop subcutaneous insulin infusion algorithm with a short-acting insulin analog for long-term clinical application of a wearable artificial endocrine pancreas, Frontiers of Medical and Biological Engineering, 8 (1997), 197-211.   Google Scholar

[34]

H. E. Skipper, On mathematical modeling of critical variables in cancer treatment (goals: better understanding of the past and better planning in the future), Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 48 (1986), 253-278.   Google Scholar

[35]

G. W. Swan, Applications of Optimal Control Theory in Medicine, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1984.  Google Scholar

[36]

G. W. Swan, General applications of optimal control theory in cancer chemotherapy, IMA J. of Mathematical Applications in Medicine and Biology, 5 (1988), 303-316.  doi: 10.1093/imammb/5.4.303.  Google Scholar

[37]

G. W. Swan, Role of optimal control in cancer chemotherapy, Mathematical Biosciences, 101, (1990), 237–284. Google Scholar

[38]

A. Swierniak, Optimal treatment protocols in leukemia - modelling the proliferation cycle, Biomedical Systems Modelling and Simulation (Paris, 1988), 51–53, IMACS Ann. Comput. Appl. Math., 5, IMACS Trans. Sci. Comput. '88, Baltzer, Basel, 1989.  Google Scholar

[39]

A. Swierniak, Cell cycle as an object of control,, Journal of Biological Systems, 3 (1995), 9-54.  doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-28095-0_2.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

B. Bonnard and M. Chyba, Singular Trajectories and their Role in Control Theory, Mathématiques & Applications, vol. 40, Springer Verlag, Paris, 2003.  Google Scholar

[2]

A. Bressan and B. Piccoli, Introduction to the Mathematical Theory of Control, American Institute of Mathematical Sciences, 2007.  Google Scholar

[3]

C. S. Chou and A. Friedman, Introduction to Mathematical Biology - Modeling, Analysis and Simulation, Springer Verlag, 2016. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-29638-8.  Google Scholar

[4]

M. Eisen, Mathematical Models in Cell Biology and Cancer Chemotherapy, Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, Vol. 30, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1979.  Google Scholar

[5]

L. A. Fernández and C. Pola, Optimal control problems for the Gompertz model under the Norton-Simon hypothesis in chemotherapy, Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, Series B, 24 (2019), 2577-2612.  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018266.  Google Scholar

[6]

P. Hahnfeldt, D. Panigrahy, J. Folkman and L. Hlatky, Tumor development under angiogenic signaling: A dynamical theory of tumor growth, treatment response, and postvascular dormancy, Cancer Research, 59 (1999), 4770-4775.   Google Scholar

[7]

A. Källén, Computational Pharmacokinetics, Chapman and Hall, CRC, London, 2007. Google Scholar

[8]

H. Khalil, Nonlinear Systems, 3rd ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2002. Google Scholar

[9]

M. Kimmel and A. Swierniak, An optimal control problem related to leukemia chemotherapy, Scientific Bulletins of the Silesian Technical University, 65, (1983), 120–130. Google Scholar

[10]

U. Ledzewicz, H. Maurer and H. Schättler, Minimizing tumor volume for a mathematical model of anti-angiogenesis with linear pharmacokinetics, in: Recent Advances in Optimization and its Applications in Engineering, M. Diehl, F. Glineur, E. Jarlebring and W. Michiels, Eds., (2010), 267–276. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-12598-0_23.  Google Scholar

[11]

U. Ledzewicz, H. Maurer and H. Schättler, Optimal and suboptimal protocols for a mathematical model for tumor anti-angiogenesis in combination with chemotherapy, Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 8 (2011), 307-323.  doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.307.  Google Scholar

[12]

U. Ledzewicz and H. Moore, Dynamical systems properties of a mathematical model for the treatment of CML, Applied Sciences, 6 (2016), 291. doi: 10.3390/app6100291.  Google Scholar

[13]

U. Ledzewicz and H. Moore, Optimal control applied to a generalized Michaelis-Menten model of CML therapy, Dicrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, Series B, 23 (2018), 331-346.  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018022.  Google Scholar

[14]

U. Ledzewicz and H. Schättler, Controlling a model for bone marrow dynamics in cancer chemotherapy, Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 1 (2004), 95-110.  doi: 10.3934/mbe.2004.1.95.  Google Scholar

[15]

U. Ledzewicz and H. Schättler, Optimal bang-bang controls for a 2-compartment model in cancer chemotherapy, J. of Optimization Theory and Applications - JOTA, 114 (2002), 609-637.  doi: 10.1023/A:1016027113579.  Google Scholar

[16]

U. Ledzewicz and H. Schättler, The influence of PK/PD on the structure of optimal control in cancer chemotherapy models, Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering (MBE), 2 (2005), 561-578.  doi: 10.3934/mbe.2005.2.561.  Google Scholar

[17]

U. Ledzewicz and H. Schättler, Antiangiogenic therapy in cancer treatment as an optimal control problem, SIAM J. on Control and Optimization, 46 (2007), 1052-1079.  doi: 10.1137/060665294.  Google Scholar

[18]

U. Ledzewicz and H. Schättler, Optimal and suboptimal protocols for a class of mathematical models of tumor anti-angiogenesis, J. of Theoretical Biology, 252 (2008), 295-312.  doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.02.014.  Google Scholar

[19]

U. Ledzewicz and H. Schättler, Singular controls and chattering arcs in optimal control problems arising in biomedicine, Control and Cybernetics, 38 (2009), 1501-1523.   Google Scholar

[20]

M. Leszczyński, E. Ratajczyk, U. Ledzewicz and H. Schättler, Sufficient conditions for optimality for a mathematical model of drug treatment with pharmacodynamics, Opuscula Mathematica, 37 (2017), 403-419.  doi: 10.7494/OpMath.2017.37.3.403.  Google Scholar

[21]

M. Leszczyński, U. Ledzewicz and H. Schättler, Optimal control for a mathematical model for anti-angiogenic treatment with Michaelis-Menten pharmacodynamics, Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, Series B, 24 (2019), 2315-2334.  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019097.  Google Scholar

[22]

M. Leszczyński, U. Ledzewicz and H. Schättler, Optimal control for a mathematical model for chemotherapy with pharmacometrics, Mathematical Modelling of Natural Phenomena, 2020. doi: 10.1051/mmnp/2020008.  Google Scholar

[23]

H. Moore, U. Ledzewicz and L. Strauss, Optimization of combination therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia with dosing constraints, J. of Mathematical Biology, 77 (2018), 1533-1561.  doi: 10.1007/s00285-018-1262-6.  Google Scholar

[24]

A. d'Onofrio, U. Ledzewicz, H. Maurer and H. Schättler, On optimal delivery of combination therapy for tumors, Mathematical Biosciences, 222, (2009), 13–26. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2009.08.004.  Google Scholar

[25]

P. Macheras and A. Iliadin, Modeling in Biopharmaceutics, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics, Vol. 30, 2nd ed., Springer, New York, 2016. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-27598-7.  Google Scholar

[26] R. Martin and K. L. Teo, Optimal Control of Drug Administration in Cancer Chemotherapy, World Scientific Press, ingapore, 1994.  doi: 10.1142/2048.  Google Scholar
[27]

L. G. de Pillis and A. Radunskaya, A mathematical tumor model with immune resistance and drug therapy: An optimal control approach, J. of Theoretical Medicine, 3 (2001), 79-100.   Google Scholar

[28]

L. S. Pontryagin, V. G. Boltyanskii, R. V. Gamkrelidze and E. F. Mishchenko, The Mathematical Theory of Optimal Processes, Macmillan, New York, 1964.  Google Scholar

[29]

M. Rowland and T.N. Tozer, Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Wolters Kluwer Lippicott, Philadelphia, 1995. Google Scholar

[30]

H. Schättler and U. Ledzewicz, Geometric Optimal Control, Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics, vol. 38, Springer, 2012. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3834-2.  Google Scholar

[31]

H. Schättler and U. Ledzewicz, Optimal Control for Mathematical Models of Cancer Therapies, Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics, vol. 42, Springer, 2015. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2972-6.  Google Scholar

[32]

H. Schättler, U. Ledzewicz and H. Maurer, Sufficient conditions for strong locak optimality in optimal control problems with $L_2$-type objectives and control constraints, Dicrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, Series B, 19 (2014), 2657-2679.  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.2657.  Google Scholar

[33]

S. Shimoda, K. Nishida, M. Sakakida, Y. Konno, K. Ichinose, M. Uehara, T. Nowak and M. Shichiri, Closed-loop subcutaneous insulin infusion algorithm with a short-acting insulin analog for long-term clinical application of a wearable artificial endocrine pancreas, Frontiers of Medical and Biological Engineering, 8 (1997), 197-211.   Google Scholar

[34]

H. E. Skipper, On mathematical modeling of critical variables in cancer treatment (goals: better understanding of the past and better planning in the future), Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 48 (1986), 253-278.   Google Scholar

[35]

G. W. Swan, Applications of Optimal Control Theory in Medicine, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1984.  Google Scholar

[36]

G. W. Swan, General applications of optimal control theory in cancer chemotherapy, IMA J. of Mathematical Applications in Medicine and Biology, 5 (1988), 303-316.  doi: 10.1093/imammb/5.4.303.  Google Scholar

[37]

G. W. Swan, Role of optimal control in cancer chemotherapy, Mathematical Biosciences, 101, (1990), 237–284. Google Scholar

[38]

A. Swierniak, Optimal treatment protocols in leukemia - modelling the proliferation cycle, Biomedical Systems Modelling and Simulation (Paris, 1988), 51–53, IMACS Ann. Comput. Appl. Math., 5, IMACS Trans. Sci. Comput. '88, Baltzer, Basel, 1989.  Google Scholar

[39]

A. Swierniak, Cell cycle as an object of control,, Journal of Biological Systems, 3 (1995), 9-54.  doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-28095-0_2.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  A schematic representation of the interactions described by pharmacometric models
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2.  $ E_{max} $ model for the PD of a drug
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3.  Sigmoidal model for the PD of a drug
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4.  Formulation [CC0]: Example of an optimal control of the type $ \mathbf{u}_{\max}\mathbf{s0} $ as function of time (left) and corresponding controlled trajectory (right) shown with the tumor volume $ p $ on the vertical axis and the vasculature $ q $ on the horizontal axis for initial data $ (p_{0}, q_{0}, A) = (12000, 15000, 300) $. The full dose segment for the control and its corresponding trajectory are shown in red, the singular pieces in blue and the no dose segments in green. While the control is singular, the system follows the singular arc $ S $. The dynamics is very fast horizontally along the full and no-dose segments which generates long segments of the trajectory for small time intervals, but it is much slower vertically along the singular control. This segment is the dominant piece in time and the only segment where a significant reduction of the vasculature is achieved
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 5.  Comparison of the solution to the restricted optimization problem where controls are kept constant for 3 months for year 3 (top row; controls shown on the left and the corresponding states are given on the right) with the solutions to the optimal control problem for year 3 (shown in the bottom row)
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

[1]

Maciej Leszczyński, Urszula Ledzewicz, Heinz Schättler. Optimal control for a mathematical model for anti-angiogenic treatment with Michaelis-Menten pharmacodynamics. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (5) : 2315-2334. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019097
[2]

Shuo Wang, Heinz Schättler. Optimal control for cancer chemotherapy under tumor heterogeneity with Michealis-Menten pharmacodynamics. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (5) : 2383-2405. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019100
[3]

Urszula Ledzewicz, Heinz Schättler. On optimal singular controls for a general SIR-model with vaccination and treatment. Conference Publications, 2011, 2011 (Special) : 981-990. doi: 10.3934/proc.2011.2011.981
[4]

Nasser Sweilam, Fathalla Rihan, Seham AL-Mekhlafi. A fractional-order delay differential model with optimal control for cancer treatment based on synergy between anti-angiogenic and immune cell therapies. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020, 13 (9) : 2403-2424. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020120
[5]

Ellina Grigorieva, Evgenii Khailov, Andrei Korobeinikov. An optimal control problem in HIV treatment. Conference Publications, 2013, 2013 (special) : 311-322. doi: 10.3934/proc.2013.2013.311
[6]

Wei Feng, Shuhua Hu, Xin Lu. Optimal controls for a 3-compartment model for cancer chemotherapy with quadratic objective. Conference Publications, 2003, 2003 (Special) : 544-553. doi: 10.3934/proc.2003.2003.544
[7]

Urszula Ledzewicz, Heinz Schättler. The Influence of PK/PD on the Structure of Optimal Controls in Cancer Chemotherapy Models. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2005, 2 (3) : 561-578. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2005.2.561
[8]

Maria do Rosário de Pinho, Helmut Maurer, Hasnaa Zidani. Optimal control of normalized SIMR models with vaccination and treatment. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (1) : 79-99. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018006
[9]

Urszula Ledzewicz, Heinz Schättler. Drug resistance in cancer chemotherapy as an optimal control problem. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2006, 6 (1) : 129-150. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2006.6.129
[10]

Shanjian Tang. A second-order maximum principle for singular optimal stochastic controls. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 14 (4) : 1581-1599. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.14.1581
[11]

Luis A. Fernández, Cecilia Pola. Catalog of the optimal controls in cancer chemotherapy for the Gompertz model depending on PK/PD and the integral constraint. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2014, 19 (6) : 1563-1588. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.1563
[12]

Christoph Sadée, Eugene Kashdan. A model of thermotherapy treatment for bladder cancer. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2016, 13 (6) : 1169-1183. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2016037
[13]

Cristiana J. Silva, Delfim F. M. Torres. A TB-HIV/AIDS coinfection model and optimal control treatment. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2015, 35 (9) : 4639-4663. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.4639
[14]

Urszula Ledzewicz, Mohammad Naghnaeian, Heinz Schättler. Dynamics of tumor-immune interaction under treatment as an optimal control problem. Conference Publications, 2011, 2011 (Special) : 971-980. doi: 10.3934/proc.2011.2011.971
[15]

Joaquim P. Mateus, Paulo Rebelo, Silvério Rosa, César M. Silva, Delfim F. M. Torres. Optimal control of non-autonomous SEIRS models with vaccination and treatment. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 11 (6) : 1179-1199. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2018067
[16]

Yali Yang, Sanyi Tang, Xiaohong Ren, Huiwen Zhao, Chenping Guo. Global stability and optimal control for a tuberculosis model with vaccination and treatment. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (3) : 1009-1022. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016.21.1009
[17]

Cristiana J. Silva, Delfim F. M. Torres. Optimal control strategies for tuberculosis treatment: A case study in Angola. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2012, 2 (3) : 601-617. doi: 10.3934/naco.2012.2.601
[18]

Sanjukta Hota, Folashade Agusto, Hem Raj Joshi, Suzanne Lenhart. Optimal control and stability analysis of an epidemic model with education campaign and treatment. Conference Publications, 2015, 2015 (special) : 621-634. doi: 10.3934/proc.2015.0621
[19]

Djamila Moulay, M. A. Aziz-Alaoui, Hee-Dae Kwon. Optimal control of chikungunya disease: Larvae reduction, treatment and prevention. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2012, 9 (2) : 369-392. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2012.9.369
[20]

Holly Gaff, Elsa Schaefer. Optimal control applied to vaccination and treatment strategies for various epidemiological models. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2009, 6 (3) : 469-492. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2009.6.469

2019 Impact Factor: 1.27

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (13)
  • HTML views (52)
  • Cited by (0)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2020 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences