# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

## Dynamic observers for unknown populations

 1 Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK 2 Boston Fusion Corporation, Lexington, MA 02421 3 Department of Mathematics, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588-0130 4 Department of Biological Sciences and Mathematics, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588-0130 5 Environment and Sustainability Institute, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Penryn campus, Penryn, TR10 9FE, UK

* Corresponding author

Received  June 2019 Revised  May 2020 Published  August 2020

Dynamic observers are considered in the context of structured-population modeling and management. Roughly, observers combine a known measured variable of some process with a model of that process to asymptotically reconstruct the unknown state variable of the model. We investigate the potential use of observers for reconstructing population distributions described by density-independent (linear) models and a class of density-dependent (nonlinear) models. In both the density-dependent and -independent cases, we show, in several ecologically reasonable circumstances, that there is a natural, optimal construction of these observers. Further, we describe the robustness these observers exhibit with respect to disturbances and uncertainty in measurement.

Citation: Chris Guiver, Nathan Poppelreiter, Richard Rebarber, Brigitte Tenhumberg, Stuart Townley. Dynamic observers for unknown populations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020232
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
Illustration of a dynamic observer. The dashed lines in the right-hand figure at computed using the measured variable $y(t)$
Numerical simulations from Example 5.1. Abundances from the model (LO) are plotted against time. The solid line and dotted lines are the abundance of the eighth stage-class $x_8(t)$ of the (forced) cheetah population, and its corresponding observer state $z_8(t)$, respectively. The dashed and dashed-dotted lines are $\| x(t)\|_1$ and $\| z(t)\|_1$, the total population and its observer estimate, respectively
Numerical simulations from Example 5.2. In both panels, the solid, dashed, dashed-dotted and dotted lines denote the total population $\| x(t)\|_1$, the corresponding estimate $\| z(t)\|_1$, the error $\| x(t) - z(t) \|_1$ and the unforced equilibrium $\| x^*\|_1$, respectively, each plotted against time $t$. In (a), no forcing terms are present, so $d = 0$ and $v = 0$, and the error converges to zero. In (b), the forcing and measurement error terms are nonzero, described in the main text
Numerical simulations from Example 5.3. The solid line denotes $\|x(t)\|_1$, and the dashed, dashed-dotted, and dotted lines denote the errors $\| x(t) - z(t)\|_1$ for increasing measurement error. See the main text
 [1] Chao Xing, Jiaojiao Pan, Hong Luo. Stability and dynamic transition of a toxin-producing phytoplankton-zooplankton model with additional food. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020275 [2] Abdelghafour Atlas, Mostafa Bendahmane, Fahd Karami, Driss Meskine, Omar Oubbih. A nonlinear fractional reaction-diffusion system applied to image denoising and decomposition. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020321 [3] Manil T. Mohan. First order necessary conditions of optimality for the two dimensional tidal dynamics system. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2020  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020045 [4] Adel M. Al-Mahdi, Mohammad M. Al-Gharabli, Salim A. Messaoudi. New general decay result for a system of viscoelastic wave equations with past history. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020273 [5] Sumit Arora, Manil T. Mohan, Jaydev Dabas. Approximate controllability of a Sobolev type impulsive functional evolution system in Banach spaces. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2020  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020049 [6] Helmut Abels, Andreas Marquardt. On a linearized Mullins-Sekerka/Stokes system for two-phase flows. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020467 [7] Yichen Zhang, Meiqiang Feng. A coupled $p$-Laplacian elliptic system: Existence, uniqueness and asymptotic behavior. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (4) : 1419-1438. doi: 10.3934/era.2020075 [8] Youshan Tao, Michael Winkler. Critical mass for infinite-time blow-up in a haptotaxis system with nonlinear zero-order interaction. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (1) : 439-454. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020216 [9] Jianquan Li, Xin Xie, Dian Zhang, Jia Li, Xiaolin Lin. Qualitative analysis of a simple tumor-immune system with time delay of tumor action. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020341 [10] Denis Bonheure, Silvia Cingolani, Simone Secchi. Concentration phenomena for the Schrödinger-Poisson system in $\mathbb{R}^2$. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020447 [11] Xavier Carvajal, Liliana Esquivel, Raphael Santos. On local well-posedness and ill-posedness results for a coupled system of mkdv type equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020382 [12] Fathalla A. Rihan, Hebatallah J. Alsakaji. Stochastic delay differential equations of three-species prey-predator system with cooperation among prey species. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020468 [13] Mathew Gluck. Classification of solutions to a system of $n^{\rm th}$ order equations on $\mathbb R^n$. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (12) : 5413-5436. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020246 [14] Laurent Di Menza, Virginie Joanne-Fabre. An age group model for the study of a population of trees. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020464 [15] Xiyou Cheng, Zhitao Zhang. Structure of positive solutions to a class of Schrödinger systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020461 [16] Ebraheem O. Alzahrani, Muhammad Altaf Khan. Androgen driven evolutionary population dynamics in prostate cancer growth. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020426 [17] Soniya Singh, Sumit Arora, Manil T. Mohan, Jaydev Dabas. Approximate controllability of second order impulsive systems with state-dependent delay in Banach spaces. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2020  doi: 10.3934/eect.2020103 [18] Li-Bin Liu, Ying Liang, Jian Zhang, Xiaobing Bao. A robust adaptive grid method for singularly perturbed Burger-Huxley equations. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (4) : 1439-1457. doi: 10.3934/era.2020076 [19] Bahaaeldin Abdalla, Thabet Abdeljawad. Oscillation criteria for kernel function dependent fractional dynamic equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020443 [20] Meng Chen, Yong Hu, Matteo Penegini. On projective threefolds of general type with small positive geometric genus. Electronic Research Archive, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/era.2020117

2019 Impact Factor: 1.27

## Tools

Article outline

Figures and Tables