# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

## Efficient and accurate sav schemes for the generalized Zakharov systems

 1 Department of Mathematics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA 2 School of Mathematical Sciences, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Mathematical Modeling, and High-Performance Scientific Computing, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China

Received  March 2020 Revised  July 2020 Published  August 2020

Fund Project: This work is partially supported by NSF grant DMS-1720442 and NSFC grant 11971407

We develop in this paper efficient and accurate numerical schemes based on the scalar auxiliary variable (SAV) approach for the generalized Zakharov system and generalized vector Zakharov system. These schemes are second-order in time, linear, unconditionally stable, only require solving linear systems with constant coefficients at each time step, and preserve exactly a modified Hamiltonian. Ample numerical results are presented to demonstrate the accuracy and robustness of the schemes.

Citation: Jie Shen, Nan Zheng. Efficient and accurate sav schemes for the generalized Zakharov systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020262
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
Numerical solutions of the electric field $|E(x,t)|^2$ at T = 1
Numerical solutions of the electric field $|E(x,t)|^2$ at $[0,1]$
Numerical and reference solutions for Case Ⅲ at T = 2 (left column) and T = 4 (right column)
Numerical solutions in (4.2): surface-plots of the electron density $|E(x,y,t)|^2$ (left) and ion density fluctuation $N(x,y,t)$ (right) for Case 1 with $\gamma = 0.8$ and $\lambda = 20$
Numerical solutions in (4.2): surface-plots of the electron density $|E(x,y,t)|^2$ (left) and ion density fluctuation $N(x,y,t)$ (left) with $\gamma = 0.1$ and $\lambda = 20$
Numerical solutions in (4.2): surface-plots of the electron density $|E(x,y,t)|^2$ (left) and ion density fluctuation $N(x,y,t)$ (left) for Case 1 with $\gamma = 0.1$ and $\lambda = 100$
Numerical solutions in (4.3) for Case Ⅰ with $\lambda = 2$
Numerical solutions in (4.3) for Case Ⅱ with $\lambda = 2$
Numerical solutions in (4.3) for Case Ⅲ with $\lambda = 2$
Numerical solutions in (4.3) for Case Ⅲ with $\lambda = 100$
Evolution of the total wave energy $\|\textbf{E}(t)\|^2$ and the wave energy of the three components of the electric field $\|E_1(t)\|^2$, $\|E_2(t)\|^2$ and $\|E_3(t)\|^2$ in (4.4) for Case 1 (left) and Case 2 (right)
Error and convergence rates in time
 $\delta t$ $|e_E|_{L^{\infty}(0,T;L^{\infty})}$ $Rate$ $|e_N|_{L^{\infty}(0,T;L^{\infty})}$ $Rate$ $2\times 10^{-2}$ 1.90E(-3) - 1.60E(-3) - $1\times 10^{-2}$ 4.82E(-4) 1.98 3.94E(-4) 1.98 $5\times 10^{-3}$ 1.21E(-4) 1.99 9.93E(-5) 1.99 $2.5\times 10^{-3}$ 3.04E(-5) 2.00 2.49E(-5) 2.00 $1.25\times 10^{-3}$ 7.61E(-6) 2.00 6.23E(-6) 2.00 $6.25\times 10^{-4}$ 1.90E(-6) 2.00 1.56E(-6) 2.00 $3.125\times 10^{-4}$ 4.76E(-7) 2.00 3.93E(-7) 1.99 $1.5625\times 10^{-4}$ 1.21E(-7) 1.97 1.08E(-7) 1.87
 $\delta t$ $|e_E|_{L^{\infty}(0,T;L^{\infty})}$ $Rate$ $|e_N|_{L^{\infty}(0,T;L^{\infty})}$ $Rate$ $2\times 10^{-2}$ 1.90E(-3) - 1.60E(-3) - $1\times 10^{-2}$ 4.82E(-4) 1.98 3.94E(-4) 1.98 $5\times 10^{-3}$ 1.21E(-4) 1.99 9.93E(-5) 1.99 $2.5\times 10^{-3}$ 3.04E(-5) 2.00 2.49E(-5) 2.00 $1.25\times 10^{-3}$ 7.61E(-6) 2.00 6.23E(-6) 2.00 $6.25\times 10^{-4}$ 1.90E(-6) 2.00 1.56E(-6) 2.00 $3.125\times 10^{-4}$ 4.76E(-7) 2.00 3.93E(-7) 1.99 $1.5625\times 10^{-4}$ 1.21E(-7) 1.97 1.08E(-7) 1.87
Discretization Error in space
 $N$ 32 64 128 256 $|e_E|_{L^{\infty}(0,T;L^{\infty})}$ 5.40E(-1) 7.84E(-2) 1.91E(-4) 8.88E(-7) $|e_N|_{L^{\infty}(0,T;L^{\infty})}$ 2.64E(-1) 1.23E(-1) 1.10E(-3) 5.19E(-6)
 $N$ 32 64 128 256 $|e_E|_{L^{\infty}(0,T;L^{\infty})}$ 5.40E(-1) 7.84E(-2) 1.91E(-4) 8.88E(-7) $|e_N|_{L^{\infty}(0,T;L^{\infty})}$ 2.64E(-1) 1.23E(-1) 1.10E(-3) 5.19E(-6)
Error and convergence rates for the conserved quantities
 $\delta t$ $|e_{D^{GZS}}|_{L^{\infty}(0,T)}$ $Rate$ $|e_P^{GZS}|_{L^{\infty}(0,T)}$ $Rate$ $|e_H^{GZS}|_{L^{\infty}(0,T)}$ $Rate$ $8\times 10^{-2}$ 1.50E(-3) - 2.10E(-3) - 2.00E(-3) - $4\times 10^{-2}$ 1.69E(-4) 3.14 4.68E(-4) 2.16 2.26E(-4) 3.10 $2\times 10^{-2}$ 2.05E(-5) 3.04 1.12E(-4) 2.07 2.90E(-5) 3.02 $1\times 10^{-2}$ 2.53E(-6) 3.02 2.73E(-5) 2.03 3.60E(-6) 3.01 $5\times 10^{-3}$ 3.14E(-7) 3.01 6.74E(-6) 2.02 4.49E(-7) 3.00 $2.5\times 10^{-3}$ 3.91E(-8) 3.01 1.68E(-6) 2.01 5.61E(-8) 3.00 $1.25\times 10^{-3}$ 4.88E(-9) 3.00 4.18E(-7) 2.00 7.09E(-9) 2.98 $6.25\times 10^{-4}$ 6.09E(-10) 3.00 1.05E(-7) 1.99 1.18E(-9) 2.58
 $\delta t$ $|e_{D^{GZS}}|_{L^{\infty}(0,T)}$ $Rate$ $|e_P^{GZS}|_{L^{\infty}(0,T)}$ $Rate$ $|e_H^{GZS}|_{L^{\infty}(0,T)}$ $Rate$ $8\times 10^{-2}$ 1.50E(-3) - 2.10E(-3) - 2.00E(-3) - $4\times 10^{-2}$ 1.69E(-4) 3.14 4.68E(-4) 2.16 2.26E(-4) 3.10 $2\times 10^{-2}$ 2.05E(-5) 3.04 1.12E(-4) 2.07 2.90E(-5) 3.02 $1\times 10^{-2}$ 2.53E(-6) 3.02 2.73E(-5) 2.03 3.60E(-6) 3.01 $5\times 10^{-3}$ 3.14E(-7) 3.01 6.74E(-6) 2.02 4.49E(-7) 3.00 $2.5\times 10^{-3}$ 3.91E(-8) 3.01 1.68E(-6) 2.01 5.61E(-8) 3.00 $1.25\times 10^{-3}$ 4.88E(-9) 3.00 4.18E(-7) 2.00 7.09E(-9) 2.98 $6.25\times 10^{-4}$ 6.09E(-10) 3.00 1.05E(-7) 1.99 1.18E(-9) 2.58
 [1] Hao Wang. Uniform stability estimate for the Vlasov-Poisson-Boltzmann system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (2) : 657-680. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020292 [2] Zongyuan Li, Weinan Wang. Norm inflation for the Boussinesq system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020353 [3] Neng Zhu, Zhengrong Liu, Fang Wang, Kun Zhao. Asymptotic dynamics of a system of conservation laws from chemotaxis. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (2) : 813-847. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020301 [4] Craig Cowan, Abdolrahman Razani. Singular solutions of a Lane-Emden system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (2) : 621-656. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020291 [5] Abdelghafour Atlas, Mostafa Bendahmane, Fahd Karami, Driss Meskine, Omar Oubbih. A nonlinear fractional reaction-diffusion system applied to image denoising and decomposition. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020321 [6] Manil T. Mohan. First order necessary conditions of optimality for the two dimensional tidal dynamics system. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2020  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020045 [7] Sumit Arora, Manil T. Mohan, Jaydev Dabas. Approximate controllability of a Sobolev type impulsive functional evolution system in Banach spaces. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2020  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020049 [8] Helmut Abels, Andreas Marquardt. On a linearized Mullins-Sekerka/Stokes system for two-phase flows. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020467 [9] Adel M. Al-Mahdi, Mohammad M. Al-Gharabli, Salim A. Messaoudi. New general decay result for a system of viscoelastic wave equations with past history. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2021, 20 (1) : 389-404. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020273 [10] Yuxin Zhang. The spatially heterogeneous diffusive rabies model and its shadow system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020357 [11] Hai Huang, Xianlong Fu. Optimal control problems for a neutral integro-differential system with infinite delay. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2020  doi: 10.3934/eect.2020107 [12] Fanni M. Sélley. A self-consistent dynamical system with multiple absolutely continuous invariant measures. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2021, 8 (1) : 9-32. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2021002 [13] Yichen Zhang, Meiqiang Feng. A coupled $p$-Laplacian elliptic system: Existence, uniqueness and asymptotic behavior. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (4) : 1419-1438. doi: 10.3934/era.2020075 [14] Youshan Tao, Michael Winkler. Critical mass for infinite-time blow-up in a haptotaxis system with nonlinear zero-order interaction. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (1) : 439-454. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020216 [15] Jianquan Li, Xin Xie, Dian Zhang, Jia Li, Xiaolin Lin. Qualitative analysis of a simple tumor-immune system with time delay of tumor action. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020341 [16] Denis Bonheure, Silvia Cingolani, Simone Secchi. Concentration phenomena for the Schrödinger-Poisson system in $\mathbb{R}^2$. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020447 [17] Xavier Carvajal, Liliana Esquivel, Raphael Santos. On local well-posedness and ill-posedness results for a coupled system of mkdv type equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020382 [18] Fathalla A. Rihan, Hebatallah J. Alsakaji. Stochastic delay differential equations of three-species prey-predator system with cooperation among prey species. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020468 [19] Karoline Disser. Global existence and uniqueness for a volume-surface reaction-nonlinear-diffusion system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (1) : 321-330. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020326 [20] Chandra Shekhar, Amit Kumar, Shreekant Varshney, Sherif Ibrahim Ammar. $\bf{M/G/1}$ fault-tolerant machining system with imperfection. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (1) : 1-28. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019096

2019 Impact Factor: 1.27