American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020269

Numerical analysis of two new finite difference methods for time-fractional telegraph equation

Xiaozhong Yang , and  Xinlong Liu

School of Mathematics and Physics, North China Electric Power University, Beijing, 102206, China

* Corresponding author: Xiaozhong Yang

Received  December 2019 Revised  July 2020 Published  September 2020

Fund Project: The work was supported in part by the Subproject of Major Science and Technology Program of China (No.2017ZX07101001-01) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.11371135)

Fractional telegraph equations are an important class of evolution equations and have widely applications in signal analysis such as transmission and propagation of electrical signals. Aiming at the one-dimensional time-fractional telegraph equation, a class of explicit-implicit (E-I) difference methods and implicit-explicit (I-E) difference methods are proposed. The two methods are based on a combination of the classical implicit difference method and the classical explicit difference method. Under the premise of smooth solution, theoretical analysis and numerical experiments show that the E-I and I-E difference schemes are unconditionally stable, with 2nd order spatial accuracy, $ 2-\alpha $ order time accuracy, and have significant time-saving, their calculation efficiency is higher than the classical implicit scheme. The research shows that the E-I and I-E difference methods constructed in this paper are effective for solving the time-fractional telegraph equation.

Keywords: Time-fractional telegraph equation, E-I difference scheme and I-E difference scheme, unconditional stability, convergence, numerical experiments.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 65M06; Secondary: 65M12.
Citation: Xiaozhong Yang, Xinlong Liu. Numerical analysis of two new finite difference methods for time-fractional telegraph equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020269
References:
[1]

T. Akram, M. Abbas, A. I. Ismail, N. Hj. M. Ali and D. Baleanu, Extended cubic B-splines in the numerical solution of time fractional telegraph equation, Adv. Differ. Equ., (2019), Paper No. 365, 20 pp. doi: 10.1186/s13662-019-2296-9.  Google Scholar

[2]

D. J. Arrigo and S. G. Krantz, Analytical Techniques for Solving Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations, Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2019. doi: 10.2200/S00907ED1V01Y201903MAS025.  Google Scholar

[3]

A. Atangana, On the stability and convergence of the time-fractional variable order telegraph equation, J. Comput. Phys., 293 (2015), 104-114.  doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2014.12.043.  Google Scholar

[4]

R. C. Cascaval, E. C. Eckstein, C. L. Frota and J. A. Goldstein, Fractional telegraph equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 276 (2002), 145-159.  doi: 10.1016/S0022-247X(02)00394-3.  Google Scholar

[5]

J. Chen, F. Liu and V. Anh, Analytical solution for the time-fractional telegraph equation by the method of separating variables, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 338 (2008), 1364-1377.  doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.06.023.  Google Scholar

[6]

S. Das, K. Vishal, P. K. Gupta and A. Yildirim, An approximate analytical solution of time-fractional telegraph equation, Appl. Math. Comput., 217 (2011), 7405-7411.  doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2011.02.030.  Google Scholar

[7]

W. Deng and Z. Zhang, High Accuracy Algorithm for the Differentail Equations Governing Anomalous Diffusion, Algorithm and Models for Anomalous Diffusion, World Scientific, Singapore, 2019.  Google Scholar

[8]

K. Diethelm, The Analysis of Fraction Differential Equations, Springer, 2010. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-14574-2.  Google Scholar

[9]

M. Ferreira, M. M. Rodrigues and N. Vieira, First and second fundamental solutions of the time-fractional telegraph equation with Laplace or Dirac oprators, Adv. Appl. Clifford Algebr, 28 (2018), Art. 42, 14 pp. doi: 10.1007/s00006-018-0858-7.  Google Scholar

[10]

N. J. Ford, M. M. Rodrigues, J. Xiao and Y. Yan, Numerical analysis of a two-parameter fractional telegraph equation, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 249 (2013), 95-106.  doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2013.02.009.  Google Scholar

[11] B. Guo, X. Pu and F. Huang, Fractional Partial Differential Equations and Their Numerical Solutions, Science Press, Beijing, 2011.  doi: 10.1142/9543.  Google Scholar
[12]

L. Hervé and L. Brigitte, Partial Differential Equations: Modeling, Analysis and Numerical Approximation, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2016. Google Scholar

[13]

M. H. Heydari, M. R. Hooshmandasl and F. Mohammadi, Two-Dimensional legendre wavelets for solving time-fractional telegraph equation, Adv. Appl. Math. Mech., 6 (2014), 247-260.  doi: 10.4208/aamm.12-m12132.  Google Scholar

[14]

V. R. Hosseini, W. Chen and Z. Avazzadeh, Numerical solution of fractional telegraph equation by using radial basis functions, Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem, 38 (2014), 31-39.  doi: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2013.10.009.  Google Scholar

[15]

W. Jiang and Y. Lin, Representation of exact solution for the time-fractional telegraph equation in the reproducing kernel space, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 16 (2011), 3639-3645.  doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2010.12.019.  Google Scholar

[16]

K. Kumar, R. K. Pandey and S. Yadav, Finite difference scheme for a fractional telegraph equation with generalized fractional derivative terms, Physica A, 535 (2019), Art. 122271, 15 pp. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.122271.  Google Scholar

[17] C. Li and F. Zeng, Numerical Methods for Fractional Calculus, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2015.   Google Scholar
[18]

C. Li, Z. Zhao and Y. Chen, Numerical approximation of nonlinear fractional differential equations with subdiffusion and superdiffusion, Comput. Math. Appl., 62 (2011), 855-875.  doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.02.045.  Google Scholar

[19]

Y. Lin and C. Xu, Finite difference/spectral approximations for the time-fractional diffusion equation, J. Comput. Phys., 225 (2007), 1533-1552.  doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2007.02.001.  Google Scholar

[20]

F. Liu, P. Zhuang, V. Anh, I. Turner and K. Burrage, Stability and convergence of the difference methods for the space-time fractional advection-diffusion equation, Appl. Math. Comput, 191 (2007), 17-20.  doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2006.08.162.  Google Scholar

[21] F. Liu, P. Zhuang and Q. Liu, Numerical Solutions of Fractional Order Partial Differential Equations and its Applications, Science Press, Beijing, 2015.   Google Scholar
[22]

M. O. Mamchuev, Solutions of the main boundary value problems for the time-fractional telegraph equation by the green function method, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 20 (2017), 190-211.  doi: 10.1515/fca-2017-0010.  Google Scholar

[23]

S. Momani, Analytic and approximate solutions of the space- and time-fractional telegraph equations, Appl. Math. Comput., 170 (2005), 1126-1134.  doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2005.01.009.  Google Scholar

[24]

E. Orsingher and L. Beghin, Time-fractional telegraph equations and telegraph processes with brownian time, Probab. Theory Relat. Fields, 128 (2004), 141-160.  doi: 10.1007/s00440-003-0309-8.  Google Scholar

[25]

A. Saadatmandi and M. Mohabbati, Numerical solution of fractional telegraph equation via the tau method, Math. Rep., 17 (2015), 155-166.   Google Scholar

[26]

J. Sabatier, O. P. Agrawal and J. A. Tenreiro Machado (Editors), Advances in Fractional Calculus: Theoretical Developments and Applications in Physics and Engineering, World Book Incorporated Beijing, 2014. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6042-7.  Google Scholar

[27]

M. Stynes, E. O' Riordan and J. L. Gracia, Error analysis of a finite difference method on graded meshes for a time-fractional diffusion equation, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 55 (2017), 1057-1079.  doi: 10.1137/16M1082329.  Google Scholar

[28] Z. Sun and G. Gao, Finite Difference Methods for Fractional Differential Equations, Science Press, Beijing, 2015.   Google Scholar
[29]

V. V. Uchaikin, Fractional Derivatives for Physicists and Engineers: Volume II Applications, Higher Education Press; Springer, Heidelberg, Beijing, 2013. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-33911-0.  Google Scholar

[30]

S. Vong, P. Lyu and Z. Wang, A compact difference scheme for fractional sub-diffusion equations with the spatially variable coefficient under neumann boundary conditions, J. Sci. Comput., 66 (2016), 725-739.  doi: 10.1007/s10915-015-0040-5.  Google Scholar

[31]

H. Wang, A. Cheng and K. Wang, Fast finite volume methods for space-fractional diffusion equations, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B., 20 (2015), 1427-1441.  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2015.20.1427.  Google Scholar

[32]

L. Wei, H. Dai, D. Zhang and Z. Si, Fully discrete local discontinuous Galerkin method for solving the fractional telegraph equation, Calcolo, 51 (2014), 175-192.  doi: 10.1007/s10092-013-0084-6.  Google Scholar

[33]

P. Xanthoulos and G. E. Zouraris, A linearly implicit finite difference method for a Klein-Gordon-Schrödinger system modeling electron-ion plasma waves, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B., 10 (2008), 239-263.  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2008.10.239.  Google Scholar

[34]

X. Yang, L. Wu, S. Sun and X. Zhang, A universal difference method for time-space fractional Black-Scholes equation, Adv. Differ. Equ., (2016), Paper No. 71, 14 pp. doi: 10.1186/s13662-016-0792-8.  Google Scholar

[35]

A. Yildirim, He's homtopy perturbation method for solving the space and time fractional telegraph equations, Int. J. Comput. Math., 87 (2010), 2998-3006.  doi: 10.1080/00207160902874653.  Google Scholar

[36]

Z. Zhao and C. Li, Fractional difference/finite element approximations for the time-space fractional telegraph equation, Appl. Math. Comput., 219 (2012), 2975-2988.  doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2012.09.022.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

T. Akram, M. Abbas, A. I. Ismail, N. Hj. M. Ali and D. Baleanu, Extended cubic B-splines in the numerical solution of time fractional telegraph equation, Adv. Differ. Equ., (2019), Paper No. 365, 20 pp. doi: 10.1186/s13662-019-2296-9.  Google Scholar

[2]

D. J. Arrigo and S. G. Krantz, Analytical Techniques for Solving Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations, Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2019. doi: 10.2200/S00907ED1V01Y201903MAS025.  Google Scholar

[3]

A. Atangana, On the stability and convergence of the time-fractional variable order telegraph equation, J. Comput. Phys., 293 (2015), 104-114.  doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2014.12.043.  Google Scholar

[4]

R. C. Cascaval, E. C. Eckstein, C. L. Frota and J. A. Goldstein, Fractional telegraph equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 276 (2002), 145-159.  doi: 10.1016/S0022-247X(02)00394-3.  Google Scholar

[5]

J. Chen, F. Liu and V. Anh, Analytical solution for the time-fractional telegraph equation by the method of separating variables, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 338 (2008), 1364-1377.  doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.06.023.  Google Scholar

[6]

S. Das, K. Vishal, P. K. Gupta and A. Yildirim, An approximate analytical solution of time-fractional telegraph equation, Appl. Math. Comput., 217 (2011), 7405-7411.  doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2011.02.030.  Google Scholar

[7]

W. Deng and Z. Zhang, High Accuracy Algorithm for the Differentail Equations Governing Anomalous Diffusion, Algorithm and Models for Anomalous Diffusion, World Scientific, Singapore, 2019.  Google Scholar

[8]

K. Diethelm, The Analysis of Fraction Differential Equations, Springer, 2010. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-14574-2.  Google Scholar

[9]

M. Ferreira, M. M. Rodrigues and N. Vieira, First and second fundamental solutions of the time-fractional telegraph equation with Laplace or Dirac oprators, Adv. Appl. Clifford Algebr, 28 (2018), Art. 42, 14 pp. doi: 10.1007/s00006-018-0858-7.  Google Scholar

[10]

N. J. Ford, M. M. Rodrigues, J. Xiao and Y. Yan, Numerical analysis of a two-parameter fractional telegraph equation, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 249 (2013), 95-106.  doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2013.02.009.  Google Scholar

[11] B. Guo, X. Pu and F. Huang, Fractional Partial Differential Equations and Their Numerical Solutions, Science Press, Beijing, 2011.  doi: 10.1142/9543.  Google Scholar
[12]

L. Hervé and L. Brigitte, Partial Differential Equations: Modeling, Analysis and Numerical Approximation, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2016. Google Scholar

[13]

M. H. Heydari, M. R. Hooshmandasl and F. Mohammadi, Two-Dimensional legendre wavelets for solving time-fractional telegraph equation, Adv. Appl. Math. Mech., 6 (2014), 247-260.  doi: 10.4208/aamm.12-m12132.  Google Scholar

[14]

V. R. Hosseini, W. Chen and Z. Avazzadeh, Numerical solution of fractional telegraph equation by using radial basis functions, Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem, 38 (2014), 31-39.  doi: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2013.10.009.  Google Scholar

[15]

W. Jiang and Y. Lin, Representation of exact solution for the time-fractional telegraph equation in the reproducing kernel space, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 16 (2011), 3639-3645.  doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2010.12.019.  Google Scholar

[16]

K. Kumar, R. K. Pandey and S. Yadav, Finite difference scheme for a fractional telegraph equation with generalized fractional derivative terms, Physica A, 535 (2019), Art. 122271, 15 pp. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.122271.  Google Scholar

[17] C. Li and F. Zeng, Numerical Methods for Fractional Calculus, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2015.   Google Scholar
[18]

C. Li, Z. Zhao and Y. Chen, Numerical approximation of nonlinear fractional differential equations with subdiffusion and superdiffusion, Comput. Math. Appl., 62 (2011), 855-875.  doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.02.045.  Google Scholar

[19]

Y. Lin and C. Xu, Finite difference/spectral approximations for the time-fractional diffusion equation, J. Comput. Phys., 225 (2007), 1533-1552.  doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2007.02.001.  Google Scholar

[20]

F. Liu, P. Zhuang, V. Anh, I. Turner and K. Burrage, Stability and convergence of the difference methods for the space-time fractional advection-diffusion equation, Appl. Math. Comput, 191 (2007), 17-20.  doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2006.08.162.  Google Scholar

[21] F. Liu, P. Zhuang and Q. Liu, Numerical Solutions of Fractional Order Partial Differential Equations and its Applications, Science Press, Beijing, 2015.   Google Scholar
[22]

M. O. Mamchuev, Solutions of the main boundary value problems for the time-fractional telegraph equation by the green function method, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 20 (2017), 190-211.  doi: 10.1515/fca-2017-0010.  Google Scholar

[23]

S. Momani, Analytic and approximate solutions of the space- and time-fractional telegraph equations, Appl. Math. Comput., 170 (2005), 1126-1134.  doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2005.01.009.  Google Scholar

[24]

E. Orsingher and L. Beghin, Time-fractional telegraph equations and telegraph processes with brownian time, Probab. Theory Relat. Fields, 128 (2004), 141-160.  doi: 10.1007/s00440-003-0309-8.  Google Scholar

[25]

A. Saadatmandi and M. Mohabbati, Numerical solution of fractional telegraph equation via the tau method, Math. Rep., 17 (2015), 155-166.   Google Scholar

[26]

J. Sabatier, O. P. Agrawal and J. A. Tenreiro Machado (Editors), Advances in Fractional Calculus: Theoretical Developments and Applications in Physics and Engineering, World Book Incorporated Beijing, 2014. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6042-7.  Google Scholar

[27]

M. Stynes, E. O' Riordan and J. L. Gracia, Error analysis of a finite difference method on graded meshes for a time-fractional diffusion equation, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 55 (2017), 1057-1079.  doi: 10.1137/16M1082329.  Google Scholar

[28] Z. Sun and G. Gao, Finite Difference Methods for Fractional Differential Equations, Science Press, Beijing, 2015.   Google Scholar
[29]

V. V. Uchaikin, Fractional Derivatives for Physicists and Engineers: Volume II Applications, Higher Education Press; Springer, Heidelberg, Beijing, 2013. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-33911-0.  Google Scholar

[30]

S. Vong, P. Lyu and Z. Wang, A compact difference scheme for fractional sub-diffusion equations with the spatially variable coefficient under neumann boundary conditions, J. Sci. Comput., 66 (2016), 725-739.  doi: 10.1007/s10915-015-0040-5.  Google Scholar

[31]

H. Wang, A. Cheng and K. Wang, Fast finite volume methods for space-fractional diffusion equations, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B., 20 (2015), 1427-1441.  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2015.20.1427.  Google Scholar

[32]

L. Wei, H. Dai, D. Zhang and Z. Si, Fully discrete local discontinuous Galerkin method for solving the fractional telegraph equation, Calcolo, 51 (2014), 175-192.  doi: 10.1007/s10092-013-0084-6.  Google Scholar

[33]

P. Xanthoulos and G. E. Zouraris, A linearly implicit finite difference method for a Klein-Gordon-Schrödinger system modeling electron-ion plasma waves, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B., 10 (2008), 239-263.  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2008.10.239.  Google Scholar

[34]

X. Yang, L. Wu, S. Sun and X. Zhang, A universal difference method for time-space fractional Black-Scholes equation, Adv. Differ. Equ., (2016), Paper No. 71, 14 pp. doi: 10.1186/s13662-016-0792-8.  Google Scholar

[35]

A. Yildirim, He's homtopy perturbation method for solving the space and time fractional telegraph equations, Int. J. Comput. Math., 87 (2010), 2998-3006.  doi: 10.1080/00207160902874653.  Google Scholar

[36]

Z. Zhao and C. Li, Fractional difference/finite element approximations for the time-space fractional telegraph equation, Appl. Math. Comput., 219 (2012), 2975-2988.  doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2012.09.022.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  Curved surface of exact solution
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2.  Curved surface of implicit scheme solution
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3.  Curved surface of E-I scheme solution
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4.  Curved surface of I-E scheme solution
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 5.  SRET of numerical solutions of three schemes
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 6.  The distribution of DTE in spatial grid
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 7.  Comparison of computing time among three schemes
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 8.  Curved surface of exact solution
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 9.  Curved surface of implicit scheme solution
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 10.  Curved surface of E-I scheme solution
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 11.  Curved surface of I-E scheme solution
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 12.  SRET of numerical solutions of two schemes
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 13.  The distribution of DTE in spatial grid
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Table 1.  Comparison of numerical and exact solutions
21 41 61 81
Exact solution 0.032816 0.038767 0.045800 0.054104
Implicit scheme solution 0.032727 0.038662 0.045673 0.053957
E-I scheme solution 0.032238 0.037960 0.044992 0.053152
I-E scheme solution 0.032168 0.038002 0.044895 0.053037
Table Options

Download as excel

21 41 61 81
Exact solution 0.032816 0.038767 0.045800 0.054104
Implicit scheme solution 0.032727 0.038662 0.045673 0.053957
E-I scheme solution 0.032238 0.037960 0.044992 0.053152
I-E scheme solution 0.032168 0.038002 0.044895 0.053037
Table 2.  Spatial convergence orders and numerical errors of implicit scheme, E-I scheme and I-E scheme($ \tau = h^{2}) $
$ \alpha $ M Implicit scheme E-I scheme I-E scheme
$ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order1 $ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order1 $ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order1
0.6 6 0.601261438 — 0.670908875 — 0.676867797 —
12 0.171331703 1.811200301 0.185496548 1.854724481 0.185742355 1.865571243
24 0.027626239 1.861354661 0.020497637 1.880049324 0.056380674 1.888092124
0.7 6 0.572754131 — 0.625245364 — 0.632403830 —
12 0.154051855 1.894499914 0.167207909 1.902779364 0.167706812 1.914904807
24 0.043125187 1.968989813 0.042627245 1.954591537 0.042269721 1.953396613
0.8 6 0.331546455 — 0.384936527 — 0.392207783 —
12 0.093281787 1.829543269 0.000168779 1.942187657 0.000592926 1.963089311
24 0.025790914 1.887189262 0.042627245 1.954591537 0.042269721 1.953396613
0.9 6 0.312856198 — 0.351172503 — 0.354347245 —
12 0.079460269 1.977194091 0.084117921 2.061694794 0.084447694 2.069033890
24 0.020221416 1.978009907 0.021169310 2.057999271 0.021427164 2.056110578
Table Options

Download as excel

$ \alpha $ M Implicit scheme E-I scheme I-E scheme
$ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order1 $ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order1 $ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order1
0.6 6 0.601261438 — 0.670908875 — 0.676867797 —
12 0.171331703 1.811200301 0.185496548 1.854724481 0.185742355 1.865571243
24 0.027626239 1.861354661 0.020497637 1.880049324 0.056380674 1.888092124
0.7 6 0.572754131 — 0.625245364 — 0.632403830 —
12 0.154051855 1.894499914 0.167207909 1.902779364 0.167706812 1.914904807
24 0.043125187 1.968989813 0.042627245 1.954591537 0.042269721 1.953396613
0.8 6 0.331546455 — 0.384936527 — 0.392207783 —
12 0.093281787 1.829543269 0.000168779 1.942187657 0.000592926 1.963089311
24 0.025790914 1.887189262 0.042627245 1.954591537 0.042269721 1.953396613
0.9 6 0.312856198 — 0.351172503 — 0.354347245 —
12 0.079460269 1.977194091 0.084117921 2.061694794 0.084447694 2.069033890
24 0.020221416 1.978009907 0.021169310 2.057999271 0.021427164 2.056110578
Table 3.  Time convergence orders and numerical errors of implicit scheme, E-I scheme and I-E scheme($ h = \frac{1}{40} $)
$ \alpha $ N Implicit scheme E-I scheme I-E scheme
$ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order2 $ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order2 $ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order2
0.6 300 0.001748225 — 0.001257729 — 0.001257729 —
600 0.000647496 1.432945906 0.000769857 1.408158851 0.000795404 1.415571243
1200 0.000238734 1.437531875 0.000300146 1.406435732 0.000300015 1.406473635
0.7 300 0.003765612 — 0.002220764 — 0.002081502 —
600 0.001462733 1.364217584 0.000902026 1.299814239 0.000902020 1.206383164
1200 0.000662609 1.342435234 0.000608222 1.325685702 0.000608231 1.322349016
0.8 300 0.002921061 — 0.001592343 — 0.001453911 —
600 0.001224089 1.254076687 0.000647496 1.298205933 0.000647496 1.236914092
1200 0.000532251 1.205163582 0.000267776 1.296425166 0.000264108 1.293815168
0.9 300 0.003178454 — 0.002285670 — 0.002149714 —
600 0.001481610 1.101159256 0.000973810 1.230904340 0.000910832 1.238886806
1200 0.000791962 1.052349016 0.000348563 1.116311302 0.000451147 1.116552467
Table Options

Download as excel

$ \alpha $ N Implicit scheme E-I scheme I-E scheme
$ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order2 $ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order2 $ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order2
0.6 300 0.001748225 — 0.001257729 — 0.001257729 —
600 0.000647496 1.432945906 0.000769857 1.408158851 0.000795404 1.415571243
1200 0.000238734 1.437531875 0.000300146 1.406435732 0.000300015 1.406473635
0.7 300 0.003765612 — 0.002220764 — 0.002081502 —
600 0.001462733 1.364217584 0.000902026 1.299814239 0.000902020 1.206383164
1200 0.000662609 1.342435234 0.000608222 1.325685702 0.000608231 1.322349016
0.8 300 0.002921061 — 0.001592343 — 0.001453911 —
600 0.001224089 1.254076687 0.000647496 1.298205933 0.000647496 1.236914092
1200 0.000532251 1.205163582 0.000267776 1.296425166 0.000264108 1.293815168
0.9 300 0.003178454 — 0.002285670 — 0.002149714 —
600 0.001481610 1.101159256 0.000973810 1.230904340 0.000910832 1.238886806
1200 0.000791962 1.052349016 0.000348563 1.116311302 0.000451147 1.116552467
Table 4.  Comparison of numerical and exact solutions
21 41 61 81
Exact solution -0.03079 -0.04618 -0.04618 -0.03079
Implicit scheme solution -0.03008 -0.04505 -0.04505 -0.03008
E-I scheme solution -0.03001 -0.04492 -0.04492 -0.03001
I-E scheme solution -0.03001 -0.04492 -0.04492 -0.03001
Table Options

Download as excel

21 41 61 81
Exact solution -0.03079 -0.04618 -0.04618 -0.03079
Implicit scheme solution -0.03008 -0.04505 -0.04505 -0.03008
E-I scheme solution -0.03001 -0.04492 -0.04492 -0.03001
I-E scheme solution -0.03001 -0.04492 -0.04492 -0.03001
Table 5.  Spatial convergence orders and numerical errors of implicit scheme and E-I scheme ($ \tau = h^{2}) $
$ \alpha $ M Implicit scheme E-I scheme
$ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order1 $ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order1
8 0.007395715 — 0.006928145 —
0.2 16 0.001926582 1.940537064 0.001786161 1.955606884
32 0.000486619 1.985178414 0.000447580 1.996642455
64 0.000121970 1.996305831 0.000110261 2.004338515
8 0.007399299 — 0.006730926 —
0.3 16 0.001926975 1.944911724 0.001748227 1.944911722
32 0.000486657 1.996642453 0.000440517 1.988623313
64 0.000121970 1.996374655 0.000110261 1.998266445
8 0.007406310 — 0.006655592 —
0.4 16 0.001927758 1.941830430 0.001736738 1.938186701
32 0.000486747 1.985359045 0.000438647 1.988623313
64 1.988623313 1.996518415 0.000109876 1.996547989
8 0.007418404 — 0.006638599 —
0.5 16 0.001929358 1.942987829 0.001735124 1.935839557
32 0.000486961 1.986241089 0.000438424 1.984638177
64 0.000122001 1.996814720 0.000109876 1.996450948
Table Options

Download as excel

$ \alpha $ M Implicit scheme E-I scheme
$ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order1 $ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order1
8 0.007395715 — 0.006928145 —
0.2 16 0.001926582 1.940537064 0.001786161 1.955606884
32 0.000486619 1.985178414 0.000447580 1.996642455
64 0.000121970 1.996305831 0.000110261 2.004338515
8 0.007399299 — 0.006730926 —
0.3 16 0.001926975 1.944911724 0.001748227 1.944911722
32 0.000486657 1.996642453 0.000440517 1.988623313
64 0.000121970 1.996374655 0.000110261 1.998266445
8 0.007406310 — 0.006655592 —
0.4 16 0.001927758 1.941830430 0.001736738 1.938186701
32 0.000486747 1.985359045 0.000438647 1.988623313
64 1.988623313 1.996518415 0.000109876 1.996547989
8 0.007418404 — 0.006638599 —
0.5 16 0.001929358 1.942987829 0.001735124 1.935839557
32 0.000486961 1.986241089 0.000438424 1.984638177
64 0.000122001 1.996814720 0.000109876 1.996450948
Table 6.  Time convergence orders and numerical errors of implicit scheme and E-I scheme ($ h = \frac{1}{40} $)
$ \alpha $ N Implicit scheme E-I scheme
$ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order2 $ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order2
150 0.003247111 — 0.003127877 —
0.2 300 0.0038902781 0.260726667 0.003593341 0.200141963
600 0.0046878951 0.269069826 0.000447580 0.211580117
150 0.003053496 — 0.002880601 —
0.3 300 0.003751789 0.297116513 0.003603101 0.322869023
600 0.004664256 0.314069826 0.004535791 0.332115801
150 0.002847062 — 0.002645836 —
0.4 300 0.003604515 0.340331208 0.003490906 0.399877794
600 0.004639253 0.359191478 0.004623847 0.405493914
150 0.002620013 — 0.002391991 —
0.5 300 0.003442873 0.394038915 0.003330367 0.477464645
600 0.004561314 0.405837085 0.004690116 0.493943176
Table Options

Download as excel

$ \alpha $ N Implicit scheme E-I scheme
$ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order2 $ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order2
150 0.003247111 — 0.003127877 —
0.2 300 0.0038902781 0.260726667 0.003593341 0.200141963
600 0.0046878951 0.269069826 0.000447580 0.211580117
150 0.003053496 — 0.002880601 —
0.3 300 0.003751789 0.297116513 0.003603101 0.322869023
600 0.004664256 0.314069826 0.004535791 0.332115801
150 0.002847062 — 0.002645836 —
0.4 300 0.003604515 0.340331208 0.003490906 0.399877794
600 0.004639253 0.359191478 0.004623847 0.405493914
150 0.002620013 — 0.002391991 —
0.5 300 0.003442873 0.394038915 0.003330367 0.477464645
600 0.004561314 0.405837085 0.004690116 0.493943176
[1]

Caifang Wang, Tie Zhou. The order of convergence for Landweber Scheme with $\alpha,\beta$-rule. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2012, 6 (1) : 133-146. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2012.6.133
[2]

Tomáš Roubíček. An energy-conserving time-discretisation scheme for poroelastic media with phase-field fracture emitting waves and heat. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2017, 10 (4) : 867-893. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2017044
[3]

Wolf-Jüergen Beyn, Janosch Rieger. The implicit Euler scheme for one-sided Lipschitz differential inclusions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 14 (2) : 409-428. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.14.409
[4]

Alina Chertock, Alexander Kurganov, Mária Lukáčová-Medvi${\rm{\check{d}}}$ová, Șeyma Nur Özcan. An asymptotic preserving scheme for kinetic chemotaxis models in two space dimensions. Kinetic & Related Models, 2019, 12 (1) : 195-216. doi: 10.3934/krm.2019009
[5]

Chih-Chiang Fang. Bayesian decision making in determining optimal leased term and preventive maintenance scheme for leased facilities. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020127
[6]

Rabiaa Ouahabi, Nasr-Eddine Hamri. Design of new scheme adaptive generalized hybrid projective synchronization for two different chaotic systems with uncertain parameters. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (5) : 2361-2370. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020182
[7]

Liangliang Ma. Stability of hydrostatic equilibrium to the 2D fractional Boussinesq equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021068
[8]

Bin Pei, Yong Xu, Yuzhen Bai. Convergence of p-th mean in an averaging principle for stochastic partial differential equations driven by fractional Brownian motion. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020, 25 (3) : 1141-1158. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019213
[9]

Kin Ming Hui, Soojung Kim. Asymptotic large time behavior of singular solutions of the fast diffusion equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2017, 37 (11) : 5943-5977. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017258
[10]

Amit Goswami, Sushila Rathore, Jagdev Singh, Devendra Kumar. Analytical study of fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equation with harmonic oscillator. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2021021
[11]

Zengyun Wang, Jinde Cao, Zuowei Cai, Lihong Huang. Finite-time stability of impulsive differential inclusion: Applications to discontinuous impulsive neural networks. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (5) : 2677-2692. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020200
[12]

Dayalal Suthar, Sunil Dutt Purohit, Haile Habenom, Jagdev Singh. Class of integrals and applications of fractional kinetic equation with the generalized multi-index Bessel function. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2021019
[13]

Changpin Li, Zhiqiang Li. Asymptotic behaviors of solution to partial differential equation with Caputo–Hadamard derivative and fractional Laplacian: Hyperbolic case. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2021023
[14]

J. Frédéric Bonnans, Justina Gianatti, Francisco J. Silva. On the convergence of the Sakawa-Shindo algorithm in stochastic control. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2016, 6 (3) : 391-406. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2016008
[15]

Fernando P. da Costa, João T. Pinto, Rafael Sasportes. On the convergence to critical scaling profiles in submonolayer deposition models. Kinetic & Related Models, 2018, 11 (6) : 1359-1376. doi: 10.3934/krm.2018053
[16]

Alberto Bressan, Carlotta Donadello. On the convergence of viscous approximations after shock interactions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2009, 23 (1&2) : 29-48. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.23.29
[17]

Raghda A. M. Attia, Dumitru Baleanu, Dianchen Lu, Mostafa M. A. Khater, El-Sayed Ahmed. Computational and numerical simulations for the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2021018
[18]

Hailing Xuan, Xiaoliang Cheng. Numerical analysis and simulation of an adhesive contact problem with damage and long memory. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (5) : 2781-2804. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020205
[19]

Vieri Benci, Marco Cococcioni. The algorithmic numbers in non-archimedean numerical computing environments. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (5) : 1673-1692. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020449
[20]

Vakhtang Putkaradze, Stuart Rogers. Numerical simulations of a rolling ball robot actuated by internal point masses. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (2) : 143-207. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020021

2019 Impact Factor: 1.27

Tools

Article outline

Figures and Tables

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2021 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences