American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020269

Numerical analysis of two new finite difference methods for time-fractional telegraph equation

Xiaozhong Yang , and  Xinlong Liu

School of Mathematics and Physics, North China Electric Power University, Beijing, 102206, China

* Corresponding author: Xiaozhong Yang

Received  December 2019 Revised  July 2020 Published  September 2020

Fund Project: The work was supported in part by the Subproject of Major Science and Technology Program of China (No.2017ZX07101001-01) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.11371135)

Fractional telegraph equations are an important class of evolution equations and have widely applications in signal analysis such as transmission and propagation of electrical signals. Aiming at the one-dimensional time-fractional telegraph equation, a class of explicit-implicit (E-I) difference methods and implicit-explicit (I-E) difference methods are proposed. The two methods are based on a combination of the classical implicit difference method and the classical explicit difference method. Under the premise of smooth solution, theoretical analysis and numerical experiments show that the E-I and I-E difference schemes are unconditionally stable, with 2nd order spatial accuracy, $ 2-\alpha $ order time accuracy, and have significant time-saving, their calculation efficiency is higher than the classical implicit scheme. The research shows that the E-I and I-E difference methods constructed in this paper are effective for solving the time-fractional telegraph equation.

Keywords: Time-fractional telegraph equation, E-I difference scheme and I-E difference scheme, unconditional stability, convergence, numerical experiments.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 65M06; Secondary: 65M12.
Citation: Xiaozhong Yang, Xinlong Liu. Numerical analysis of two new finite difference methods for time-fractional telegraph equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020269
References:
[1]

T. Akram, M. Abbas, A. I. Ismail, N. Hj. M. Ali and D. Baleanu, Extended cubic B-splines in the numerical solution of time fractional telegraph equation, Adv. Differ. Equ., (2019), Paper No. 365, 20 pp. doi: 10.1186/s13662-019-2296-9.  Google Scholar

[2]

D. J. Arrigo and S. G. Krantz, Analytical Techniques for Solving Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations, Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2019. doi: 10.2200/S00907ED1V01Y201903MAS025.  Google Scholar

[3]

A. Atangana, On the stability and convergence of the time-fractional variable order telegraph equation, J. Comput. Phys., 293 (2015), 104-114.  doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2014.12.043.  Google Scholar

[4]

R. C. Cascaval, E. C. Eckstein, C. L. Frota and J. A. Goldstein, Fractional telegraph equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 276 (2002), 145-159.  doi: 10.1016/S0022-247X(02)00394-3.  Google Scholar

[5]

J. Chen, F. Liu and V. Anh, Analytical solution for the time-fractional telegraph equation by the method of separating variables, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 338 (2008), 1364-1377.  doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.06.023.  Google Scholar

[6]

S. Das, K. Vishal, P. K. Gupta and A. Yildirim, An approximate analytical solution of time-fractional telegraph equation, Appl. Math. Comput., 217 (2011), 7405-7411.  doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2011.02.030.  Google Scholar

[7]

W. Deng and Z. Zhang, High Accuracy Algorithm for the Differentail Equations Governing Anomalous Diffusion, Algorithm and Models for Anomalous Diffusion, World Scientific, Singapore, 2019.  Google Scholar

[8]

K. Diethelm, The Analysis of Fraction Differential Equations, Springer, 2010. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-14574-2.  Google Scholar

[9]

M. Ferreira, M. M. Rodrigues and N. Vieira, First and second fundamental solutions of the time-fractional telegraph equation with Laplace or Dirac oprators, Adv. Appl. Clifford Algebr, 28 (2018), Art. 42, 14 pp. doi: 10.1007/s00006-018-0858-7.  Google Scholar

[10]

N. J. Ford, M. M. Rodrigues, J. Xiao and Y. Yan, Numerical analysis of a two-parameter fractional telegraph equation, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 249 (2013), 95-106.  doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2013.02.009.  Google Scholar

[11] B. Guo, X. Pu and F. Huang, Fractional Partial Differential Equations and Their Numerical Solutions, Science Press, Beijing, 2011.  doi: 10.1142/9543.  Google Scholar
[12]

L. Hervé and L. Brigitte, Partial Differential Equations: Modeling, Analysis and Numerical Approximation, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2016. Google Scholar

[13]

M. H. Heydari, M. R. Hooshmandasl and F. Mohammadi, Two-Dimensional legendre wavelets for solving time-fractional telegraph equation, Adv. Appl. Math. Mech., 6 (2014), 247-260.  doi: 10.4208/aamm.12-m12132.  Google Scholar

[14]

V. R. Hosseini, W. Chen and Z. Avazzadeh, Numerical solution of fractional telegraph equation by using radial basis functions, Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem, 38 (2014), 31-39.  doi: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2013.10.009.  Google Scholar

[15]

W. Jiang and Y. Lin, Representation of exact solution for the time-fractional telegraph equation in the reproducing kernel space, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 16 (2011), 3639-3645.  doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2010.12.019.  Google Scholar

[16]

K. Kumar, R. K. Pandey and S. Yadav, Finite difference scheme for a fractional telegraph equation with generalized fractional derivative terms, Physica A, 535 (2019), Art. 122271, 15 pp. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.122271.  Google Scholar

[17] C. Li and F. Zeng, Numerical Methods for Fractional Calculus, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2015.   Google Scholar
[18]

C. Li, Z. Zhao and Y. Chen, Numerical approximation of nonlinear fractional differential equations with subdiffusion and superdiffusion, Comput. Math. Appl., 62 (2011), 855-875.  doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.02.045.  Google Scholar

[19]

Y. Lin and C. Xu, Finite difference/spectral approximations for the time-fractional diffusion equation, J. Comput. Phys., 225 (2007), 1533-1552.  doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2007.02.001.  Google Scholar

[20]

F. Liu, P. Zhuang, V. Anh, I. Turner and K. Burrage, Stability and convergence of the difference methods for the space-time fractional advection-diffusion equation, Appl. Math. Comput, 191 (2007), 17-20.  doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2006.08.162.  Google Scholar

[21] F. Liu, P. Zhuang and Q. Liu, Numerical Solutions of Fractional Order Partial Differential Equations and its Applications, Science Press, Beijing, 2015.   Google Scholar
[22]

M. O. Mamchuev, Solutions of the main boundary value problems for the time-fractional telegraph equation by the green function method, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 20 (2017), 190-211.  doi: 10.1515/fca-2017-0010.  Google Scholar

[23]

S. Momani, Analytic and approximate solutions of the space- and time-fractional telegraph equations, Appl. Math. Comput., 170 (2005), 1126-1134.  doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2005.01.009.  Google Scholar

[24]

E. Orsingher and L. Beghin, Time-fractional telegraph equations and telegraph processes with brownian time, Probab. Theory Relat. Fields, 128 (2004), 141-160.  doi: 10.1007/s00440-003-0309-8.  Google Scholar

[25]

A. Saadatmandi and M. Mohabbati, Numerical solution of fractional telegraph equation via the tau method, Math. Rep., 17 (2015), 155-166.   Google Scholar

[26]

J. Sabatier, O. P. Agrawal and J. A. Tenreiro Machado (Editors), Advances in Fractional Calculus: Theoretical Developments and Applications in Physics and Engineering, World Book Incorporated Beijing, 2014. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6042-7.  Google Scholar

[27]

M. Stynes, E. O' Riordan and J. L. Gracia, Error analysis of a finite difference method on graded meshes for a time-fractional diffusion equation, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 55 (2017), 1057-1079.  doi: 10.1137/16M1082329.  Google Scholar

[28] Z. Sun and G. Gao, Finite Difference Methods for Fractional Differential Equations, Science Press, Beijing, 2015.   Google Scholar
[29]

V. V. Uchaikin, Fractional Derivatives for Physicists and Engineers: Volume II Applications, Higher Education Press; Springer, Heidelberg, Beijing, 2013. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-33911-0.  Google Scholar

[30]

S. Vong, P. Lyu and Z. Wang, A compact difference scheme for fractional sub-diffusion equations with the spatially variable coefficient under neumann boundary conditions, J. Sci. Comput., 66 (2016), 725-739.  doi: 10.1007/s10915-015-0040-5.  Google Scholar

[31]

H. Wang, A. Cheng and K. Wang, Fast finite volume methods for space-fractional diffusion equations, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B., 20 (2015), 1427-1441.  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2015.20.1427.  Google Scholar

[32]

L. Wei, H. Dai, D. Zhang and Z. Si, Fully discrete local discontinuous Galerkin method for solving the fractional telegraph equation, Calcolo, 51 (2014), 175-192.  doi: 10.1007/s10092-013-0084-6.  Google Scholar

[33]

P. Xanthoulos and G. E. Zouraris, A linearly implicit finite difference method for a Klein-Gordon-Schrödinger system modeling electron-ion plasma waves, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B., 10 (2008), 239-263.  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2008.10.239.  Google Scholar

[34]

X. Yang, L. Wu, S. Sun and X. Zhang, A universal difference method for time-space fractional Black-Scholes equation, Adv. Differ. Equ., (2016), Paper No. 71, 14 pp. doi: 10.1186/s13662-016-0792-8.  Google Scholar

[35]

A. Yildirim, He's homtopy perturbation method for solving the space and time fractional telegraph equations, Int. J. Comput. Math., 87 (2010), 2998-3006.  doi: 10.1080/00207160902874653.  Google Scholar

[36]

Z. Zhao and C. Li, Fractional difference/finite element approximations for the time-space fractional telegraph equation, Appl. Math. Comput., 219 (2012), 2975-2988.  doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2012.09.022.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

T. Akram, M. Abbas, A. I. Ismail, N. Hj. M. Ali and D. Baleanu, Extended cubic B-splines in the numerical solution of time fractional telegraph equation, Adv. Differ. Equ., (2019), Paper No. 365, 20 pp. doi: 10.1186/s13662-019-2296-9.  Google Scholar

[2]

D. J. Arrigo and S. G. Krantz, Analytical Techniques for Solving Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations, Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2019. doi: 10.2200/S00907ED1V01Y201903MAS025.  Google Scholar

[3]

A. Atangana, On the stability and convergence of the time-fractional variable order telegraph equation, J. Comput. Phys., 293 (2015), 104-114.  doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2014.12.043.  Google Scholar

[4]

R. C. Cascaval, E. C. Eckstein, C. L. Frota and J. A. Goldstein, Fractional telegraph equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 276 (2002), 145-159.  doi: 10.1016/S0022-247X(02)00394-3.  Google Scholar

[5]

J. Chen, F. Liu and V. Anh, Analytical solution for the time-fractional telegraph equation by the method of separating variables, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 338 (2008), 1364-1377.  doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.06.023.  Google Scholar

[6]

S. Das, K. Vishal, P. K. Gupta and A. Yildirim, An approximate analytical solution of time-fractional telegraph equation, Appl. Math. Comput., 217 (2011), 7405-7411.  doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2011.02.030.  Google Scholar

[7]

W. Deng and Z. Zhang, High Accuracy Algorithm for the Differentail Equations Governing Anomalous Diffusion, Algorithm and Models for Anomalous Diffusion, World Scientific, Singapore, 2019.  Google Scholar

[8]

K. Diethelm, The Analysis of Fraction Differential Equations, Springer, 2010. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-14574-2.  Google Scholar

[9]

M. Ferreira, M. M. Rodrigues and N. Vieira, First and second fundamental solutions of the time-fractional telegraph equation with Laplace or Dirac oprators, Adv. Appl. Clifford Algebr, 28 (2018), Art. 42, 14 pp. doi: 10.1007/s00006-018-0858-7.  Google Scholar

[10]

N. J. Ford, M. M. Rodrigues, J. Xiao and Y. Yan, Numerical analysis of a two-parameter fractional telegraph equation, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 249 (2013), 95-106.  doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2013.02.009.  Google Scholar

[11] B. Guo, X. Pu and F. Huang, Fractional Partial Differential Equations and Their Numerical Solutions, Science Press, Beijing, 2011.  doi: 10.1142/9543.  Google Scholar
[12]

L. Hervé and L. Brigitte, Partial Differential Equations: Modeling, Analysis and Numerical Approximation, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2016. Google Scholar

[13]

M. H. Heydari, M. R. Hooshmandasl and F. Mohammadi, Two-Dimensional legendre wavelets for solving time-fractional telegraph equation, Adv. Appl. Math. Mech., 6 (2014), 247-260.  doi: 10.4208/aamm.12-m12132.  Google Scholar

[14]

V. R. Hosseini, W. Chen and Z. Avazzadeh, Numerical solution of fractional telegraph equation by using radial basis functions, Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem, 38 (2014), 31-39.  doi: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2013.10.009.  Google Scholar

[15]

W. Jiang and Y. Lin, Representation of exact solution for the time-fractional telegraph equation in the reproducing kernel space, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 16 (2011), 3639-3645.  doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2010.12.019.  Google Scholar

[16]

K. Kumar, R. K. Pandey and S. Yadav, Finite difference scheme for a fractional telegraph equation with generalized fractional derivative terms, Physica A, 535 (2019), Art. 122271, 15 pp. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.122271.  Google Scholar

[17] C. Li and F. Zeng, Numerical Methods for Fractional Calculus, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2015.   Google Scholar
[18]

C. Li, Z. Zhao and Y. Chen, Numerical approximation of nonlinear fractional differential equations with subdiffusion and superdiffusion, Comput. Math. Appl., 62 (2011), 855-875.  doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.02.045.  Google Scholar

[19]

Y. Lin and C. Xu, Finite difference/spectral approximations for the time-fractional diffusion equation, J. Comput. Phys., 225 (2007), 1533-1552.  doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2007.02.001.  Google Scholar

[20]

F. Liu, P. Zhuang, V. Anh, I. Turner and K. Burrage, Stability and convergence of the difference methods for the space-time fractional advection-diffusion equation, Appl. Math. Comput, 191 (2007), 17-20.  doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2006.08.162.  Google Scholar

[21] F. Liu, P. Zhuang and Q. Liu, Numerical Solutions of Fractional Order Partial Differential Equations and its Applications, Science Press, Beijing, 2015.   Google Scholar
[22]

M. O. Mamchuev, Solutions of the main boundary value problems for the time-fractional telegraph equation by the green function method, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 20 (2017), 190-211.  doi: 10.1515/fca-2017-0010.  Google Scholar

[23]

S. Momani, Analytic and approximate solutions of the space- and time-fractional telegraph equations, Appl. Math. Comput., 170 (2005), 1126-1134.  doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2005.01.009.  Google Scholar

[24]

E. Orsingher and L. Beghin, Time-fractional telegraph equations and telegraph processes with brownian time, Probab. Theory Relat. Fields, 128 (2004), 141-160.  doi: 10.1007/s00440-003-0309-8.  Google Scholar

[25]

A. Saadatmandi and M. Mohabbati, Numerical solution of fractional telegraph equation via the tau method, Math. Rep., 17 (2015), 155-166.   Google Scholar

[26]

J. Sabatier, O. P. Agrawal and J. A. Tenreiro Machado (Editors), Advances in Fractional Calculus: Theoretical Developments and Applications in Physics and Engineering, World Book Incorporated Beijing, 2014. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6042-7.  Google Scholar

[27]

M. Stynes, E. O' Riordan and J. L. Gracia, Error analysis of a finite difference method on graded meshes for a time-fractional diffusion equation, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 55 (2017), 1057-1079.  doi: 10.1137/16M1082329.  Google Scholar

[28] Z. Sun and G. Gao, Finite Difference Methods for Fractional Differential Equations, Science Press, Beijing, 2015.   Google Scholar
[29]

V. V. Uchaikin, Fractional Derivatives for Physicists and Engineers: Volume II Applications, Higher Education Press; Springer, Heidelberg, Beijing, 2013. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-33911-0.  Google Scholar

[30]

S. Vong, P. Lyu and Z. Wang, A compact difference scheme for fractional sub-diffusion equations with the spatially variable coefficient under neumann boundary conditions, J. Sci. Comput., 66 (2016), 725-739.  doi: 10.1007/s10915-015-0040-5.  Google Scholar

[31]

H. Wang, A. Cheng and K. Wang, Fast finite volume methods for space-fractional diffusion equations, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B., 20 (2015), 1427-1441.  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2015.20.1427.  Google Scholar

[32]

L. Wei, H. Dai, D. Zhang and Z. Si, Fully discrete local discontinuous Galerkin method for solving the fractional telegraph equation, Calcolo, 51 (2014), 175-192.  doi: 10.1007/s10092-013-0084-6.  Google Scholar

[33]

P. Xanthoulos and G. E. Zouraris, A linearly implicit finite difference method for a Klein-Gordon-Schrödinger system modeling electron-ion plasma waves, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B., 10 (2008), 239-263.  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2008.10.239.  Google Scholar

[34]

X. Yang, L. Wu, S. Sun and X. Zhang, A universal difference method for time-space fractional Black-Scholes equation, Adv. Differ. Equ., (2016), Paper No. 71, 14 pp. doi: 10.1186/s13662-016-0792-8.  Google Scholar

[35]

A. Yildirim, He's homtopy perturbation method for solving the space and time fractional telegraph equations, Int. J. Comput. Math., 87 (2010), 2998-3006.  doi: 10.1080/00207160902874653.  Google Scholar

[36]

Z. Zhao and C. Li, Fractional difference/finite element approximations for the time-space fractional telegraph equation, Appl. Math. Comput., 219 (2012), 2975-2988.  doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2012.09.022.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  Curved surface of exact solution
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2.  Curved surface of implicit scheme solution
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3.  Curved surface of E-I scheme solution
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4.  Curved surface of I-E scheme solution
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 5.  SRET of numerical solutions of three schemes
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 6.  The distribution of DTE in spatial grid
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 7.  Comparison of computing time among three schemes
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 8.  Curved surface of exact solution
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 9.  Curved surface of implicit scheme solution
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 10.  Curved surface of E-I scheme solution
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 11.  Curved surface of I-E scheme solution
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 12.  SRET of numerical solutions of two schemes
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 13.  The distribution of DTE in spatial grid
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Table 1.  Comparison of numerical and exact solutions
21 41 61 81
Exact solution 0.032816 0.038767 0.045800 0.054104
Implicit scheme solution 0.032727 0.038662 0.045673 0.053957
E-I scheme solution 0.032238 0.037960 0.044992 0.053152
I-E scheme solution 0.032168 0.038002 0.044895 0.053037
Table Options

Download as excel

21 41 61 81
Exact solution 0.032816 0.038767 0.045800 0.054104
Implicit scheme solution 0.032727 0.038662 0.045673 0.053957
E-I scheme solution 0.032238 0.037960 0.044992 0.053152
I-E scheme solution 0.032168 0.038002 0.044895 0.053037
Table 2.  Spatial convergence orders and numerical errors of implicit scheme, E-I scheme and I-E scheme($ \tau = h^{2}) $
$ \alpha $ M Implicit scheme E-I scheme I-E scheme
$ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order1 $ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order1 $ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order1
0.6 6 0.601261438 — 0.670908875 — 0.676867797 —
12 0.171331703 1.811200301 0.185496548 1.854724481 0.185742355 1.865571243
24 0.027626239 1.861354661 0.020497637 1.880049324 0.056380674 1.888092124
0.7 6 0.572754131 — 0.625245364 — 0.632403830 —
12 0.154051855 1.894499914 0.167207909 1.902779364 0.167706812 1.914904807
24 0.043125187 1.968989813 0.042627245 1.954591537 0.042269721 1.953396613
0.8 6 0.331546455 — 0.384936527 — 0.392207783 —
12 0.093281787 1.829543269 0.000168779 1.942187657 0.000592926 1.963089311
24 0.025790914 1.887189262 0.042627245 1.954591537 0.042269721 1.953396613
0.9 6 0.312856198 — 0.351172503 — 0.354347245 —
12 0.079460269 1.977194091 0.084117921 2.061694794 0.084447694 2.069033890
24 0.020221416 1.978009907 0.021169310 2.057999271 0.021427164 2.056110578
Table Options

Download as excel

$ \alpha $ M Implicit scheme E-I scheme I-E scheme
$ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order1 $ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order1 $ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order1
0.6 6 0.601261438 — 0.670908875 — 0.676867797 —
12 0.171331703 1.811200301 0.185496548 1.854724481 0.185742355 1.865571243
24 0.027626239 1.861354661 0.020497637 1.880049324 0.056380674 1.888092124
0.7 6 0.572754131 — 0.625245364 — 0.632403830 —
12 0.154051855 1.894499914 0.167207909 1.902779364 0.167706812 1.914904807
24 0.043125187 1.968989813 0.042627245 1.954591537 0.042269721 1.953396613
0.8 6 0.331546455 — 0.384936527 — 0.392207783 —
12 0.093281787 1.829543269 0.000168779 1.942187657 0.000592926 1.963089311
24 0.025790914 1.887189262 0.042627245 1.954591537 0.042269721 1.953396613
0.9 6 0.312856198 — 0.351172503 — 0.354347245 —
12 0.079460269 1.977194091 0.084117921 2.061694794 0.084447694 2.069033890
24 0.020221416 1.978009907 0.021169310 2.057999271 0.021427164 2.056110578
Table 3.  Time convergence orders and numerical errors of implicit scheme, E-I scheme and I-E scheme($ h = \frac{1}{40} $)
$ \alpha $ N Implicit scheme E-I scheme I-E scheme
$ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order2 $ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order2 $ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order2
0.6 300 0.001748225 — 0.001257729 — 0.001257729 —
600 0.000647496 1.432945906 0.000769857 1.408158851 0.000795404 1.415571243
1200 0.000238734 1.437531875 0.000300146 1.406435732 0.000300015 1.406473635
0.7 300 0.003765612 — 0.002220764 — 0.002081502 —
600 0.001462733 1.364217584 0.000902026 1.299814239 0.000902020 1.206383164
1200 0.000662609 1.342435234 0.000608222 1.325685702 0.000608231 1.322349016
0.8 300 0.002921061 — 0.001592343 — 0.001453911 —
600 0.001224089 1.254076687 0.000647496 1.298205933 0.000647496 1.236914092
1200 0.000532251 1.205163582 0.000267776 1.296425166 0.000264108 1.293815168
0.9 300 0.003178454 — 0.002285670 — 0.002149714 —
600 0.001481610 1.101159256 0.000973810 1.230904340 0.000910832 1.238886806
1200 0.000791962 1.052349016 0.000348563 1.116311302 0.000451147 1.116552467
Table Options

Download as excel

$ \alpha $ N Implicit scheme E-I scheme I-E scheme
$ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order2 $ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order2 $ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order2
0.6 300 0.001748225 — 0.001257729 — 0.001257729 —
600 0.000647496 1.432945906 0.000769857 1.408158851 0.000795404 1.415571243
1200 0.000238734 1.437531875 0.000300146 1.406435732 0.000300015 1.406473635
0.7 300 0.003765612 — 0.002220764 — 0.002081502 —
600 0.001462733 1.364217584 0.000902026 1.299814239 0.000902020 1.206383164
1200 0.000662609 1.342435234 0.000608222 1.325685702 0.000608231 1.322349016
0.8 300 0.002921061 — 0.001592343 — 0.001453911 —
600 0.001224089 1.254076687 0.000647496 1.298205933 0.000647496 1.236914092
1200 0.000532251 1.205163582 0.000267776 1.296425166 0.000264108 1.293815168
0.9 300 0.003178454 — 0.002285670 — 0.002149714 —
600 0.001481610 1.101159256 0.000973810 1.230904340 0.000910832 1.238886806
1200 0.000791962 1.052349016 0.000348563 1.116311302 0.000451147 1.116552467
Table 4.  Comparison of numerical and exact solutions
21 41 61 81
Exact solution -0.03079 -0.04618 -0.04618 -0.03079
Implicit scheme solution -0.03008 -0.04505 -0.04505 -0.03008
E-I scheme solution -0.03001 -0.04492 -0.04492 -0.03001
I-E scheme solution -0.03001 -0.04492 -0.04492 -0.03001
Table Options

Download as excel

21 41 61 81
Exact solution -0.03079 -0.04618 -0.04618 -0.03079
Implicit scheme solution -0.03008 -0.04505 -0.04505 -0.03008
E-I scheme solution -0.03001 -0.04492 -0.04492 -0.03001
I-E scheme solution -0.03001 -0.04492 -0.04492 -0.03001
Table 5.  Spatial convergence orders and numerical errors of implicit scheme and E-I scheme ($ \tau = h^{2}) $
$ \alpha $ M Implicit scheme E-I scheme
$ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order1 $ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order1
8 0.007395715 — 0.006928145 —
0.2 16 0.001926582 1.940537064 0.001786161 1.955606884
32 0.000486619 1.985178414 0.000447580 1.996642455
64 0.000121970 1.996305831 0.000110261 2.004338515
8 0.007399299 — 0.006730926 —
0.3 16 0.001926975 1.944911724 0.001748227 1.944911722
32 0.000486657 1.996642453 0.000440517 1.988623313
64 0.000121970 1.996374655 0.000110261 1.998266445
8 0.007406310 — 0.006655592 —
0.4 16 0.001927758 1.941830430 0.001736738 1.938186701
32 0.000486747 1.985359045 0.000438647 1.988623313
64 1.988623313 1.996518415 0.000109876 1.996547989
8 0.007418404 — 0.006638599 —
0.5 16 0.001929358 1.942987829 0.001735124 1.935839557
32 0.000486961 1.986241089 0.000438424 1.984638177
64 0.000122001 1.996814720 0.000109876 1.996450948
Table Options

Download as excel

$ \alpha $ M Implicit scheme E-I scheme
$ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order1 $ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order1
8 0.007395715 — 0.006928145 —
0.2 16 0.001926582 1.940537064 0.001786161 1.955606884
32 0.000486619 1.985178414 0.000447580 1.996642455
64 0.000121970 1.996305831 0.000110261 2.004338515
8 0.007399299 — 0.006730926 —
0.3 16 0.001926975 1.944911724 0.001748227 1.944911722
32 0.000486657 1.996642453 0.000440517 1.988623313
64 0.000121970 1.996374655 0.000110261 1.998266445
8 0.007406310 — 0.006655592 —
0.4 16 0.001927758 1.941830430 0.001736738 1.938186701
32 0.000486747 1.985359045 0.000438647 1.988623313
64 1.988623313 1.996518415 0.000109876 1.996547989
8 0.007418404 — 0.006638599 —
0.5 16 0.001929358 1.942987829 0.001735124 1.935839557
32 0.000486961 1.986241089 0.000438424 1.984638177
64 0.000122001 1.996814720 0.000109876 1.996450948
Table 6.  Time convergence orders and numerical errors of implicit scheme and E-I scheme ($ h = \frac{1}{40} $)
$ \alpha $ N Implicit scheme E-I scheme
$ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order2 $ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order2
150 0.003247111 — 0.003127877 —
0.2 300 0.0038902781 0.260726667 0.003593341 0.200141963
600 0.0046878951 0.269069826 0.000447580 0.211580117
150 0.003053496 — 0.002880601 —
0.3 300 0.003751789 0.297116513 0.003603101 0.322869023
600 0.004664256 0.314069826 0.004535791 0.332115801
150 0.002847062 — 0.002645836 —
0.4 300 0.003604515 0.340331208 0.003490906 0.399877794
600 0.004639253 0.359191478 0.004623847 0.405493914
150 0.002620013 — 0.002391991 —
0.5 300 0.003442873 0.394038915 0.003330367 0.477464645
600 0.004561314 0.405837085 0.004690116 0.493943176
Table Options

Download as excel

$ \alpha $ N Implicit scheme E-I scheme
$ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order2 $ E_{2}(h, \tau) $ Order2
150 0.003247111 — 0.003127877 —
0.2 300 0.0038902781 0.260726667 0.003593341 0.200141963
600 0.0046878951 0.269069826 0.000447580 0.211580117
150 0.003053496 — 0.002880601 —
0.3 300 0.003751789 0.297116513 0.003603101 0.322869023
600 0.004664256 0.314069826 0.004535791 0.332115801
150 0.002847062 — 0.002645836 —
0.4 300 0.003604515 0.340331208 0.003490906 0.399877794
600 0.004639253 0.359191478 0.004623847 0.405493914
150 0.002620013 — 0.002391991 —
0.5 300 0.003442873 0.394038915 0.003330367 0.477464645
600 0.004561314 0.405837085 0.004690116 0.493943176
[1]

Thierry Horsin, Mohamed Ali Jendoubi. On the convergence to equilibria of a sequence defined by an implicit scheme. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020465
[2]

Xuefei He, Kun Wang, Liwei Xu. Efficient finite difference methods for the nonlinear Helmholtz equation in Kerr medium. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (4) : 1503-1528. doi: 10.3934/era.2020079
[3]

Serena Dipierro, Benedetta Pellacci, Enrico Valdinoci, Gianmaria Verzini. Time-fractional equations with reaction terms: Fundamental solutions and asymptotics. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (1) : 257-275. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020137
[4]

Hoang The Tuan. On the asymptotic behavior of solutions to time-fractional elliptic equations driven by a multiplicative white noise. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020318
[5]

Reza Chaharpashlou, Abdon Atangana, Reza Saadati. On the fuzzy stability results for fractional stochastic Volterra integral equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020432
[6]

Anton A. Kutsenko. Isomorphism between one-Dimensional and multidimensional finite difference operators. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020270
[7]

Jerry L. Bona, Angel Durán, Dimitrios Mitsotakis. Solitary-wave solutions of Benjamin-Ono and other systems for internal waves. I. approximations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (1) : 87-111. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020215
[8]

Leilei Wei, Yinnian He. A fully discrete local discontinuous Galerkin method with the generalized numerical flux to solve the tempered fractional reaction-diffusion equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020319
[9]

Christopher S. Goodrich, Benjamin Lyons, Mihaela T. Velcsov. Analytical and numerical monotonicity results for discrete fractional sequential differences with negative lower bound. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020269
[10]

Omid Nikan, Seyedeh Mahboubeh Molavi-Arabshai, Hossein Jafari. Numerical simulation of the nonlinear fractional regularized long-wave model arising in ion acoustic plasma waves. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020466
[11]

Xin-Guang Yang, Lu Li, Xingjie Yan, Ling Ding. The structure and stability of pullback attractors for 3D Brinkman-Forchheimer equation with delay. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (4) : 1395-1418. doi: 10.3934/era.2020074
[12]

S. Sadeghi, H. Jafari, S. Nemati. Solving fractional Advection-diffusion equation using Genocchi operational matrix based on Atangana-Baleanu derivative. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020435
[13]

Lihong Zhang, Wenwen Hou, Bashir Ahmad, Guotao Wang. Radial symmetry for logarithmic Choquard equation involving a generalized tempered fractional $ p $-Laplacian. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020445
[14]

Parikshit Upadhyaya, Elias Jarlebring, Emanuel H. Rubensson. A density matrix approach to the convergence of the self-consistent field iteration. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (1) : 99-115. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020018
[15]

Scipio Cuccagna, Masaya Maeda. A survey on asymptotic stability of ground states of nonlinear Schrödinger equations II. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020450
[16]

Zexuan Liu, Zhiyuan Sun, Jerry Zhijian Yang. A numerical study of superconvergence of the discontinuous Galerkin method by patch reconstruction. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (4) : 1487-1501. doi: 10.3934/era.2020078
[17]

Vieri Benci, Marco Cococcioni. The algorithmic numbers in non-archimedean numerical computing environments. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020449
[18]

Chao Xing, Jiaojiao Pan, Hong Luo. Stability and dynamic transition of a toxin-producing phytoplankton-zooplankton model with additional food. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020275
[19]

A. M. Elaiw, N. H. AlShamrani, A. Abdel-Aty, H. Dutta. Stability analysis of a general HIV dynamics model with multi-stages of infected cells and two routes of infection. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020441
[20]

Marion Darbas, Jérémy Heleine, Stephanie Lohrengel. Numerical resolution by the quasi-reversibility method of a data completion problem for Maxwell's equations. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2020, 14 (6) : 1107-1133. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020056

2019 Impact Factor: 1.27

Tools

Article outline

Figures and Tables

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2020 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences