American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020319

A fully discrete local discontinuous Galerkin method with the generalized numerical flux to solve the tempered fractional reaction-diffusion equation

Leilei Wei 1,, and  Yinnian He 2,

1. 

College of Science, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China
2. 

School of Mathematics and Statistics, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China

* Corresponding author: Leilei Wei

Received  March 2020 Revised  August 2020 Published  November 2020

Fund Project: Supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Henan Provincial Colleges and Universities in Henan University of Technology(2018RCJH10), the Training Plan of Young Backbone Teachers in Henan University of Technology(21420049), the Training Plan of Young Backbone Teachers in Colleges and Universities of Henan Province (2019GGJS094), the Innovative Funds Plan of Henan University of Technology, Foundation of Henan Educational Committee(19A110005) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11771348, 11861068)

The tempered fractional diffusion equation could be recognized as the generalization of the classic fractional diffusion equation that the truncation effects are included in the bounded domains. This paper focuses on designing the high order fully discrete local discontinuous Galerkin (LDG) method based on the generalized alternating numerical fluxes for the tempered fractional diffusion equation. From a practical point of view, the generalized alternating numerical flux which is different from the purely alternating numerical flux has a broader range of applications. We first design an efficient finite difference scheme to approximate the tempered fractional derivatives and then a fully discrete LDG method for the tempered fractional diffusion equation. We prove that the scheme is unconditionally stable and convergent with the order $ O(h^{k+1}+\tau^{2-\alpha}) $, where $ h, \tau $ and $ k $ are the step size in space, time and the degree of piecewise polynomials, respectively. Finally numerical experimets are performed to show the effectiveness and testify the accuracy of the method.

Keywords: Tempered fractional diffusion equations, local discontinuous Galerkin method, stability, error estimates.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 65M12, 65M06; Secondary: 35S10.
Citation: Leilei Wei, Yinnian He. A fully discrete local discontinuous Galerkin method with the generalized numerical flux to solve the tempered fractional reaction-diffusion equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020319
References:
[1]

B. Baeumer and M. M. Meerschaert, Tempered stable Levy motion and transient superdiffusion, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 233 (2010), 2438-2448.  doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2009.10.027.  Google Scholar

[2]

A. Cartea and D. del-Castillo-Negrete, Fractional diffusion models of option prices in markets with jumps, Phys. A, 374 (2007), 749-763.  doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2006.08.071.  Google Scholar

[3]

S. Chen, J. Shen and L.-L. Wang, Generalized Jacobi functions and their applications to fractional differential equations, Math. Comp., 85 (2016), 1603-1638.  doi: 10.1090/mcom3035.  Google Scholar

[4]

Y. Chen, X. Wang and W. Deng, Tempered fractional Langevin-Brownian motion with inverse $\beta$-stable subordinator, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 51 (2018), 495001. doi: 10.1088/1751-8121/aae8b3.  Google Scholar

[5]

Y. Cheng, X. Meng and Q. Zhang, Application of generalized Gauss-Radau projections for the local discontinuous Galerkin method for linear convection-diffusion equations, Math. Comp., 86 (2017), 1233-1267.  doi: 10.1090/mcom/3141.  Google Scholar

[6]

M. Cui, Compact finite difference method for the fractional diffusion equation, J. Comput. Phys., 228 (2009), 7792-7804.  doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.07.021.  Google Scholar

[7]

V. J. Ervin and J. P. Roop, Variational formulation for the stationary fractional advection dispersion equation, umer. Methods Partial Differential Eq., 22 (2006), 558-576.  doi: 10.1002/num.20112.  Google Scholar

[8]

L. B. Feng, P. Zhuang, F. Liu, I. Turner and Y. T. Gu, Finite element method for space-time fractional diffusion equation, Numer. Algor., 72 (2016), 749-767.  doi: 10.1007/s11075-015-0065-8.  Google Scholar

[9]

J. L. Gracia and M. Stynes, Central difference approximation of convection in Caputo fractional derivative two-point boundary value problems, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 273 (2015), 103-115.  doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2014.05.025.  Google Scholar

[10]

E. Hanert and C. Piret, A Chebyshev pseudospectral method to solve the space-time tempered fractional diffusion equation, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 36 (2014), 1797-1812.  doi: 10.1137/130927292.  Google Scholar

[11]

Z. Hao, W. Cao and G. Lin, A second-order difference scheme for the time fractional substantial diffusion equation, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 313 (2017), 54-69.  doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2016.09.006.  Google Scholar

[12]

Y. Jiang and J. Ma, High-order finite element methods for time-fractional partial differential equations, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 235 (2011), 3285-3290.  doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2011.01.011.  Google Scholar

[13]

B. Jin, R. Lazarov and Z. Zhou, An analysis of the L1 scheme for the subdiffusion equation with nonsmooth data, IMA J. Numer. Anal., 36 (2016), 197-221.  doi: 10.1093/imanum/dru063.  Google Scholar

[14]

I. Koponen, Analytic approach to the problem of convergence of truncated Levy flights towards the Gaussian stochastic process, Phys. Rev. E, 52 (1995), 1197-1199.  doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.52.1197.  Google Scholar

[15]

T. A. M. Langlands and B. I. Henry, The accuracy and stability of an implicit solution method for the fractional diffusion equation, J. Comput. Phys., 205 (2005), 719-736.  doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2004.11.025.  Google Scholar

[16]

M. Li, X.-M. Gu, C. Huang, M. Fei and G. Zhang, A fast linearized conservative finite element method for the strongly coupled nonlinear fractional Schr$\ddot{o}$dinger equations, J. Compu. Phys., 358 (2018), 256-282.  doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2017.12.044.  Google Scholar

[17]

C. Li and F. Zeng, Numerical Methods for Fractional Calculus, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2015.  Google Scholar

[18]

C. Li and W. Deng, High order schemes for the tempered fractional diffusion equations, Adv. Comput. Math., 42 (2016), 543-572.  doi: 10.1007/s10444-015-9434-z.  Google Scholar

[19]

X. Li and C. Xu, A space-time spectral method for the time fractional diffusion equation, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 47 (2009), 2108-2131.  doi: 10.1137/080718942.  Google Scholar

[20]

S. Liao, Notes on the homotopy analysis method: some definitions and theorems, Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul., 14 (2009), 983-997.  doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2008.04.013.  Google Scholar

[21]

Y. Lin and C. Xu, Finite difference/spectral approximations for the time-fractional diffusion equation, J. Comput. Phys., 225 (2007), 1533-1552.  doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2007.02.001.  Google Scholar

[22] F. W. Liu, P. H. Zhuang and Q. X. Liu, The Applications and Numerical Methods of Fractional Differential Equations, Science Press, Beijing, 2015.   Google Scholar
[23]

R. N. Mantegna and H. E. Stanley, Stochastic process with ultraslow convergence to a Gaussian: The truncated Levy flight, Phys. Rev. Lett., 73 (1994), 2946-2949.  doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.2946.  Google Scholar

[24]

M. M. Meerschaert, Y. Zhang and B. Baeumer, Tempered anomalous diffusion in heterogeneous systems, Geophys., Res. Lett., 35 (2008), 190201. Google Scholar

[25]

M. M. Meerschaert and C. Tadjeran, Finite difference approximations for fractional advection-dispersion ow equations, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 172 (2004), 65-77.  doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2004.01.033.  Google Scholar

[26]

X. Meng, C.-W. Shu and B. Wu, Optimal error estimates for discontinuous Galerkin methods based on upwind-biased fluxes for linear hyperbolic equations, Math. Comp., 85 (2016), 1225-1261.  doi: 10.1090/mcom/3022.  Google Scholar

[27]

S. Momani and Z. Odibat, Comparison between the homotopy perturbation method and the variational iteration method for linear fractional partial differential equations, Comput. Math. Appl., 54 (2007), 910-919.  doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2006.12.037.  Google Scholar

[28]

J. Q. Murillo and S. B. Yuste, On three explicit difference schemes for fractional diffusion and diffusion-wave equations, Phys. Scr., 136 (2009), 14025-14030.   Google Scholar

[29]

J. Rosinski, Tempering stable processes, Stochastic Process. Appl., 117 (2007), 677-707.  doi: 10.1016/j.spa.2006.10.003.  Google Scholar

[30]

E. Sousa and C. Li, A weighted finite difference method for the fractional diffusion equation based on the Riemann-Liouville derivative, Appl. Numer. Math., 90 (2015), 22-37.  doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2014.11.007.  Google Scholar

[31]

M. Stynes, E. O'Riordan and J. L. Gracia, Error analysis of a finite difference method on graded meshes for a time-fractional diffusion equation, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 55 (2017), 1057-1079.  doi: 10.1137/16M1082329.  Google Scholar

[32]

Z.-Z. Sun and X. N. Wu, A fully discrete difference scheme for a diffusion-wave system, Appl. Numer. Math., 56 (2006), 193-209.  doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2005.03.003.  Google Scholar

[33]

H. Wang, D. Yang and S. Zhu, Inhomogeneous Dirichlet boundary-value problems of space-fractional diffusion equations and their finite element approximations, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 52 (2014), 1292-1310.  doi: 10.1137/130932776.  Google Scholar

[34]

L. Wei, X. Zhang and Y. He, Analysis of a local discontinuous Galerkin method for time-fractional advection-diffusion equations, Int. J. Heat. Fluid. Fl., 23 (2013), 634-648.  doi: 10.1108/09615531311323782.  Google Scholar

[35]

L. Wei and Y. He, Analysis of a fully discrete local discontinuous Galerkin method for time-fractional fourth-order problems, Appl. Math. Model., 38 (2014), 1511-1522.  doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2013.07.040.  Google Scholar

[36]

X. Wu, W. Deng and E. Barkai, Tempered fractional Feynman-Kac equation: Theory and examples, Phys. Rev. E, 93 (2016), 032151. doi: 10.1103/physreve.93.032151.  Google Scholar

[37]

Y. Xia, Y. Xu and C.-W. Shu, Application of the local discontinuous Galerkin method for the Allen-Cahn/Cahn-Hilliard system, Commun. Comput. Phys., 5 (2009), 821-835.   Google Scholar

[38]

Y. Xu and C.-W. Shu, Local discontinuous Galerkin methods for high-order time-dependent partial differential equations, Comm. Comput. Phys., 7 (2010), 1-46.  doi: 10.4208/cicp.2009.09.023.  Google Scholar

[39]

Y. Yu, W. Deng and J. Wu, Third order difference schemes (without using points outside of the domain) for one sided space tempered fractional partial differential equations, Appl. Numer. Math., 112 (2017), 126-145.  doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2016.10.011.  Google Scholar

[40]

H. Zhang, F. Liu, I. Turner and S. Chen, The numerical simulation of the tempered fractional Black-Scholes equation for European double barrier option, Appl. Math. Model., 40 (2016), 5819-5834.  doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2016.01.027.  Google Scholar

[41]

Q. Zhang and F.-Z. Gao, A Fully-Discrete Local Discontinuous Galerkin Method for Convection-Dominated Sobolev Equation, J. Sci. Comput., 51 (2012), 107-134.   Google Scholar

[42]

Q. Zhang and C.-W. Shu, Error estimates for the third order explicit Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method for a linear hyperbolic equation in one-dimension with discontinuous initial data, Numer. Math., 126 (2014), – 703-740. doi: 10.1007/s00211-013-0573-1.  Google Scholar

[43]

Y. Zhao, Y. Zhang, F. Liu, I. Turner, Y. Tang and V. Anh, Convergence and superconvergence of a fully-discrete scheme for multi-term time fractional diffusion equations, Comput. Math. Appl., 73 (2017), 1087-1099. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2016.05.005.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

B. Baeumer and M. M. Meerschaert, Tempered stable Levy motion and transient superdiffusion, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 233 (2010), 2438-2448.  doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2009.10.027.  Google Scholar

[2]

A. Cartea and D. del-Castillo-Negrete, Fractional diffusion models of option prices in markets with jumps, Phys. A, 374 (2007), 749-763.  doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2006.08.071.  Google Scholar

[3]

S. Chen, J. Shen and L.-L. Wang, Generalized Jacobi functions and their applications to fractional differential equations, Math. Comp., 85 (2016), 1603-1638.  doi: 10.1090/mcom3035.  Google Scholar

[4]

Y. Chen, X. Wang and W. Deng, Tempered fractional Langevin-Brownian motion with inverse $\beta$-stable subordinator, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 51 (2018), 495001. doi: 10.1088/1751-8121/aae8b3.  Google Scholar

[5]

Y. Cheng, X. Meng and Q. Zhang, Application of generalized Gauss-Radau projections for the local discontinuous Galerkin method for linear convection-diffusion equations, Math. Comp., 86 (2017), 1233-1267.  doi: 10.1090/mcom/3141.  Google Scholar

[6]

M. Cui, Compact finite difference method for the fractional diffusion equation, J. Comput. Phys., 228 (2009), 7792-7804.  doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.07.021.  Google Scholar

[7]

V. J. Ervin and J. P. Roop, Variational formulation for the stationary fractional advection dispersion equation, umer. Methods Partial Differential Eq., 22 (2006), 558-576.  doi: 10.1002/num.20112.  Google Scholar

[8]

L. B. Feng, P. Zhuang, F. Liu, I. Turner and Y. T. Gu, Finite element method for space-time fractional diffusion equation, Numer. Algor., 72 (2016), 749-767.  doi: 10.1007/s11075-015-0065-8.  Google Scholar

[9]

J. L. Gracia and M. Stynes, Central difference approximation of convection in Caputo fractional derivative two-point boundary value problems, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 273 (2015), 103-115.  doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2014.05.025.  Google Scholar

[10]

E. Hanert and C. Piret, A Chebyshev pseudospectral method to solve the space-time tempered fractional diffusion equation, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 36 (2014), 1797-1812.  doi: 10.1137/130927292.  Google Scholar

[11]

Z. Hao, W. Cao and G. Lin, A second-order difference scheme for the time fractional substantial diffusion equation, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 313 (2017), 54-69.  doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2016.09.006.  Google Scholar

[12]

Y. Jiang and J. Ma, High-order finite element methods for time-fractional partial differential equations, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 235 (2011), 3285-3290.  doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2011.01.011.  Google Scholar

[13]

B. Jin, R. Lazarov and Z. Zhou, An analysis of the L1 scheme for the subdiffusion equation with nonsmooth data, IMA J. Numer. Anal., 36 (2016), 197-221.  doi: 10.1093/imanum/dru063.  Google Scholar

[14]

I. Koponen, Analytic approach to the problem of convergence of truncated Levy flights towards the Gaussian stochastic process, Phys. Rev. E, 52 (1995), 1197-1199.  doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.52.1197.  Google Scholar

[15]

T. A. M. Langlands and B. I. Henry, The accuracy and stability of an implicit solution method for the fractional diffusion equation, J. Comput. Phys., 205 (2005), 719-736.  doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2004.11.025.  Google Scholar

[16]

M. Li, X.-M. Gu, C. Huang, M. Fei and G. Zhang, A fast linearized conservative finite element method for the strongly coupled nonlinear fractional Schr$\ddot{o}$dinger equations, J. Compu. Phys., 358 (2018), 256-282.  doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2017.12.044.  Google Scholar

[17]

C. Li and F. Zeng, Numerical Methods for Fractional Calculus, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2015.  Google Scholar

[18]

C. Li and W. Deng, High order schemes for the tempered fractional diffusion equations, Adv. Comput. Math., 42 (2016), 543-572.  doi: 10.1007/s10444-015-9434-z.  Google Scholar

[19]

X. Li and C. Xu, A space-time spectral method for the time fractional diffusion equation, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 47 (2009), 2108-2131.  doi: 10.1137/080718942.  Google Scholar

[20]

S. Liao, Notes on the homotopy analysis method: some definitions and theorems, Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul., 14 (2009), 983-997.  doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2008.04.013.  Google Scholar

[21]

Y. Lin and C. Xu, Finite difference/spectral approximations for the time-fractional diffusion equation, J. Comput. Phys., 225 (2007), 1533-1552.  doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2007.02.001.  Google Scholar

[22] F. W. Liu, P. H. Zhuang and Q. X. Liu, The Applications and Numerical Methods of Fractional Differential Equations, Science Press, Beijing, 2015.   Google Scholar
[23]

R. N. Mantegna and H. E. Stanley, Stochastic process with ultraslow convergence to a Gaussian: The truncated Levy flight, Phys. Rev. Lett., 73 (1994), 2946-2949.  doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.2946.  Google Scholar

[24]

M. M. Meerschaert, Y. Zhang and B. Baeumer, Tempered anomalous diffusion in heterogeneous systems, Geophys., Res. Lett., 35 (2008), 190201. Google Scholar

[25]

M. M. Meerschaert and C. Tadjeran, Finite difference approximations for fractional advection-dispersion ow equations, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 172 (2004), 65-77.  doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2004.01.033.  Google Scholar

[26]

X. Meng, C.-W. Shu and B. Wu, Optimal error estimates for discontinuous Galerkin methods based on upwind-biased fluxes for linear hyperbolic equations, Math. Comp., 85 (2016), 1225-1261.  doi: 10.1090/mcom/3022.  Google Scholar

[27]

S. Momani and Z. Odibat, Comparison between the homotopy perturbation method and the variational iteration method for linear fractional partial differential equations, Comput. Math. Appl., 54 (2007), 910-919.  doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2006.12.037.  Google Scholar

[28]

J. Q. Murillo and S. B. Yuste, On three explicit difference schemes for fractional diffusion and diffusion-wave equations, Phys. Scr., 136 (2009), 14025-14030.   Google Scholar

[29]

J. Rosinski, Tempering stable processes, Stochastic Process. Appl., 117 (2007), 677-707.  doi: 10.1016/j.spa.2006.10.003.  Google Scholar

[30]

E. Sousa and C. Li, A weighted finite difference method for the fractional diffusion equation based on the Riemann-Liouville derivative, Appl. Numer. Math., 90 (2015), 22-37.  doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2014.11.007.  Google Scholar

[31]

M. Stynes, E. O'Riordan and J. L. Gracia, Error analysis of a finite difference method on graded meshes for a time-fractional diffusion equation, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 55 (2017), 1057-1079.  doi: 10.1137/16M1082329.  Google Scholar

[32]

Z.-Z. Sun and X. N. Wu, A fully discrete difference scheme for a diffusion-wave system, Appl. Numer. Math., 56 (2006), 193-209.  doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2005.03.003.  Google Scholar

[33]

H. Wang, D. Yang and S. Zhu, Inhomogeneous Dirichlet boundary-value problems of space-fractional diffusion equations and their finite element approximations, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 52 (2014), 1292-1310.  doi: 10.1137/130932776.  Google Scholar

[34]

L. Wei, X. Zhang and Y. He, Analysis of a local discontinuous Galerkin method for time-fractional advection-diffusion equations, Int. J. Heat. Fluid. Fl., 23 (2013), 634-648.  doi: 10.1108/09615531311323782.  Google Scholar

[35]

L. Wei and Y. He, Analysis of a fully discrete local discontinuous Galerkin method for time-fractional fourth-order problems, Appl. Math. Model., 38 (2014), 1511-1522.  doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2013.07.040.  Google Scholar

[36]

X. Wu, W. Deng and E. Barkai, Tempered fractional Feynman-Kac equation: Theory and examples, Phys. Rev. E, 93 (2016), 032151. doi: 10.1103/physreve.93.032151.  Google Scholar

[37]

Y. Xia, Y. Xu and C.-W. Shu, Application of the local discontinuous Galerkin method for the Allen-Cahn/Cahn-Hilliard system, Commun. Comput. Phys., 5 (2009), 821-835.   Google Scholar

[38]

Y. Xu and C.-W. Shu, Local discontinuous Galerkin methods for high-order time-dependent partial differential equations, Comm. Comput. Phys., 7 (2010), 1-46.  doi: 10.4208/cicp.2009.09.023.  Google Scholar

[39]

Y. Yu, W. Deng and J. Wu, Third order difference schemes (without using points outside of the domain) for one sided space tempered fractional partial differential equations, Appl. Numer. Math., 112 (2017), 126-145.  doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2016.10.011.  Google Scholar

[40]

H. Zhang, F. Liu, I. Turner and S. Chen, The numerical simulation of the tempered fractional Black-Scholes equation for European double barrier option, Appl. Math. Model., 40 (2016), 5819-5834.  doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2016.01.027.  Google Scholar

[41]

Q. Zhang and F.-Z. Gao, A Fully-Discrete Local Discontinuous Galerkin Method for Convection-Dominated Sobolev Equation, J. Sci. Comput., 51 (2012), 107-134.   Google Scholar

[42]

Q. Zhang and C.-W. Shu, Error estimates for the third order explicit Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method for a linear hyperbolic equation in one-dimension with discontinuous initial data, Numer. Math., 126 (2014), – 703-740. doi: 10.1007/s00211-013-0573-1.  Google Scholar

[43]

Y. Zhao, Y. Zhang, F. Liu, I. Turner, Y. Tang and V. Anh, Convergence and superconvergence of a fully-discrete scheme for multi-term time fractional diffusion equations, Comput. Math. Appl., 73 (2017), 1087-1099. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2016.05.005.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  The evolution of the solution for $ \alpha = 0.3 $. $ \tau = 0.001, h = 0.01, k = 2. $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2.  The evolution of the solution for $ \alpha = 0.8 $. $ \tau = 0.001, h = 0.01, k = 2. $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Table 1.  Spatial accuracy test on uniform meshes with generalized alternating numerical fluxes when $ \delta = 0.3, \gamma = 2, M = 10^3, T = 1 $
$\delta$ $\alpha$ $P^k$ $N$ $L^2$-error order $L^\infty$-error order
$\delta=0.3$ $\alpha=0.1$ $P^0$ 5 3.600997655347402E-002 - 8.470765811325168E-002 -
10 1.751495701129877E-002 1.04 4.247840062543977E-002 1.00
20 8.698273697461307E-003 1.01 2.125369555415509E-002 1.00
40 4.341798450317296E-003 1.00 1.062863299729018E-002 1.00
$P^1$ 5 9.943585411573410E-003 - 2.757075846380118E-002 -
10 3.566273983250412E-003 1.48 1.080003816776576E-002 1.35
20 1.086919816367809E-003 1.71 3.420222759716512E-003 1.66
40 2.902709222939700E-004 1.90 9.193407604523585E-004 1.90
$P^2$ 5 7.990640423350242E-004 - 3.417434847568336E-003 -
10 8.626266947702263E-005 3.21 3.694158436061931E-004 3.20
20 1.044514634698983E-005 3.04 4.454609652087860E-005 3.05
40 1.296172202016491E-006 3.01 5.508580340890919E-006 3.01
$\alpha=0.6$ $P^0$ 5 3.594827779072097E-002 - 8.455751510071857E-002 -
10 1.750788942725992E-002 1.04 4.246067080980019E-002 1.00
20 8.697412259699867E-003 1.01 2.125151852856288E-002 1.00
40 4.341693080827747E-003 1.00 1.062836627483681E-002 1.00
$P^1$ 5 9.921671652323443E-003 - 2.759417252018699E-002 -
10 3.563738012224470E-003 1.48 1.080391242567882E-002 1.35
20 1.086707146130006E-003 1.71 3.420472591014495E-003 1.66
40 2.902558645272467E-004 1.90 9.194266256405403E-004 1.90
$P^2$ 5 7.988664990181788E-004 - 3.416510378879402E-003 -
10 8.626077461730029E-005 3.21 3.694001433403462E-004 3.20
20 1.044545573669924E-005 3.04 4.454547869921856E-005 3.05
40 1.298706242251523E-006 3.01 5.508452148315928E-006 3.01
$\alpha=0.8$ $P^0$ 5 3.592329974624144E-002 - 8.449616965675322E-002 -
10 1.750510512702476E-002 1.04 4.245362255057922E-002 1.00
20 8.697106637946338E-003 1.01 2.125073937587364E-002 1.00
40 4.341672465121832E-003 1.00 1.062831369241851E-002 1.00
$P^1$ 5 9.912664929559693E-003 - 2.760460772303402E-002 -
10 3.562659912073956E-003 1.48 1.080630043834668E-002 1.35
20 1.086605203698557E-003 1.71 3.421287359547415E-003 1.66
40 2.902460763410707E-004 1.90 9.201811924158254E-004 1.90
$P^2$ 5 7.988141577793738E-004 - 3.416151504204671E-003 -
10 8.626566626691957E-005 3.21 3.693913312302985E-004 3.21
20 1.046396713324052E-005 3.04 4.454319799217823E-005 3.05
40 1.436914611732205E-006 2.86 5.619072907782352E-006 2.99
Table Options

Download as excel

$\delta$ $\alpha$ $P^k$ $N$ $L^2$-error order $L^\infty$-error order
$\delta=0.3$ $\alpha=0.1$ $P^0$ 5 3.600997655347402E-002 - 8.470765811325168E-002 -
10 1.751495701129877E-002 1.04 4.247840062543977E-002 1.00
20 8.698273697461307E-003 1.01 2.125369555415509E-002 1.00
40 4.341798450317296E-003 1.00 1.062863299729018E-002 1.00
$P^1$ 5 9.943585411573410E-003 - 2.757075846380118E-002 -
10 3.566273983250412E-003 1.48 1.080003816776576E-002 1.35
20 1.086919816367809E-003 1.71 3.420222759716512E-003 1.66
40 2.902709222939700E-004 1.90 9.193407604523585E-004 1.90
$P^2$ 5 7.990640423350242E-004 - 3.417434847568336E-003 -
10 8.626266947702263E-005 3.21 3.694158436061931E-004 3.20
20 1.044514634698983E-005 3.04 4.454609652087860E-005 3.05
40 1.296172202016491E-006 3.01 5.508580340890919E-006 3.01
$\alpha=0.6$ $P^0$ 5 3.594827779072097E-002 - 8.455751510071857E-002 -
10 1.750788942725992E-002 1.04 4.246067080980019E-002 1.00
20 8.697412259699867E-003 1.01 2.125151852856288E-002 1.00
40 4.341693080827747E-003 1.00 1.062836627483681E-002 1.00
$P^1$ 5 9.921671652323443E-003 - 2.759417252018699E-002 -
10 3.563738012224470E-003 1.48 1.080391242567882E-002 1.35
20 1.086707146130006E-003 1.71 3.420472591014495E-003 1.66
40 2.902558645272467E-004 1.90 9.194266256405403E-004 1.90
$P^2$ 5 7.988664990181788E-004 - 3.416510378879402E-003 -
10 8.626077461730029E-005 3.21 3.694001433403462E-004 3.20
20 1.044545573669924E-005 3.04 4.454547869921856E-005 3.05
40 1.298706242251523E-006 3.01 5.508452148315928E-006 3.01
$\alpha=0.8$ $P^0$ 5 3.592329974624144E-002 - 8.449616965675322E-002 -
10 1.750510512702476E-002 1.04 4.245362255057922E-002 1.00
20 8.697106637946338E-003 1.01 2.125073937587364E-002 1.00
40 4.341672465121832E-003 1.00 1.062831369241851E-002 1.00
$P^1$ 5 9.912664929559693E-003 - 2.760460772303402E-002 -
10 3.562659912073956E-003 1.48 1.080630043834668E-002 1.35
20 1.086605203698557E-003 1.71 3.421287359547415E-003 1.66
40 2.902460763410707E-004 1.90 9.201811924158254E-004 1.90
$P^2$ 5 7.988141577793738E-004 - 3.416151504204671E-003 -
10 8.626566626691957E-005 3.21 3.693913312302985E-004 3.21
20 1.046396713324052E-005 3.04 4.454319799217823E-005 3.05
40 1.436914611732205E-006 2.86 5.619072907782352E-006 2.99
Table 2.  Spatial accuracy test on uniform meshes with generalized alternating numerical fluxes when $\delta = 0.1$, $\gamma = 2, M = 10^3, T = 1$
$\delta$ $\alpha$ $P^k$ $N$ $L^2$-error order $L^\infty$-error order
$\delta=0.1$ $\alpha=0.1$ $P^0$ 5 3.600997655347402E-002 - 8.470765811325168E-002 -
10 1.751495701129877E-002 1.04 4.247840062543977E-002 1.00
20 8.698273697461307E-003 1.01 2.125369555415509E-002 1.00
40 4.341798450317296E-003 1.00 1.062863299729018E-002 1.00
$P^1$ 5 9.125860752324633E-003 - 3.386112146946083E-002 -
10 2.295048237777114E-003 1.99 8.756550512034528E-003 1.95
20 5.745423502445809E-004 2.00 2.207822490277067E-003 1.98
40 1.436832777579926E-004 2.00 5.554382129445423E-004 1.99
$P^2$ 5 9.050669939275690E-004 - 4.298666679244556E-003 -
10 1.151488108051345E-004 2.97 5.375579180586712E-004 3.00
20 1.445721437410244E-005 2.99 6.924567827167210E-005 2.96
40 1.809466716341844E-006 3.00 8.720509756160153E-006 2.99
$\alpha=0.6$ $P^0$ 5 3.594827779072097E-002 - 8.455751510071857E-002 -
10 1.750788942725992E-002 1.04 4.246067080980019E-002 1.00
20 8.697412259699867E-003 1.01 2.125151852856288E-002 1.00
40 4.341693080827747E-003 1.00 1.062836627483681E-002 1.00
$P^1$ 5 9.121793113875693E-003 - 3.384039722034468E-002 -
10 2.294831526335838E-003 1.99 8.755484555290433E-003 1.95
20 5.745294690001247E-004 2.00 2.207828785762922E-003 1.98
40 1.436825323167711E-004 2.00 5.555100933167800E-004 1.99
$P^2$ 5 9.047609877074052E-004 - 4.297245174444950E-003 -
10 1.151394966919664E-004 2.97 5.375058641304305E-004 3.00
20 1.445715309857497E-005 2.99 6.924406859557769E-005 2.96
40 1.811270951788605E-006 3.00 8.720463021409203E-006 2.99
$\alpha=0.8$ $P^0$ 5 3.592329974624144E-002 - 8.449616965675322E-002 -
10 1.750510512702476E-002 1.04 4.245362255057922E-002 1.00
20 8.697106637946338E-003 1.01 2.125073937587364E-002 1.00
40 4.341672465121832E-003 1.00 1.062831369241851E-002 1.00
$P^1$ 5 9.120195825181981E-003 - 3.383289362730243E-002 -
10 2.294751340921533E-003 1.99 8.755789596454649E-003 1.95
20 5.745261460924934E-004 2.00 2.208566384755528E-003 1.98
40 1.436839091653192E-004 2.00 5.562652869576801E-004 1.99
$P^2$ 5 9.046409059470311E-004 - 4.297126983902264E-003 -
10 1.151376194022218E-004 2.97 5.374880423776833E-004 3.00
20 1.447012828175748E-005 2.99 6.924379906001369E-005 2.96
40 1.912757116440075E-006 2.99 8.835769827388040E-006 2.99
Table Options

Download as excel

$\delta$ $\alpha$ $P^k$ $N$ $L^2$-error order $L^\infty$-error order
$\delta=0.1$ $\alpha=0.1$ $P^0$ 5 3.600997655347402E-002 - 8.470765811325168E-002 -
10 1.751495701129877E-002 1.04 4.247840062543977E-002 1.00
20 8.698273697461307E-003 1.01 2.125369555415509E-002 1.00
40 4.341798450317296E-003 1.00 1.062863299729018E-002 1.00
$P^1$ 5 9.125860752324633E-003 - 3.386112146946083E-002 -
10 2.295048237777114E-003 1.99 8.756550512034528E-003 1.95
20 5.745423502445809E-004 2.00 2.207822490277067E-003 1.98
40 1.436832777579926E-004 2.00 5.554382129445423E-004 1.99
$P^2$ 5 9.050669939275690E-004 - 4.298666679244556E-003 -
10 1.151488108051345E-004 2.97 5.375579180586712E-004 3.00
20 1.445721437410244E-005 2.99 6.924567827167210E-005 2.96
40 1.809466716341844E-006 3.00 8.720509756160153E-006 2.99
$\alpha=0.6$ $P^0$ 5 3.594827779072097E-002 - 8.455751510071857E-002 -
10 1.750788942725992E-002 1.04 4.246067080980019E-002 1.00
20 8.697412259699867E-003 1.01 2.125151852856288E-002 1.00
40 4.341693080827747E-003 1.00 1.062836627483681E-002 1.00
$P^1$ 5 9.121793113875693E-003 - 3.384039722034468E-002 -
10 2.294831526335838E-003 1.99 8.755484555290433E-003 1.95
20 5.745294690001247E-004 2.00 2.207828785762922E-003 1.98
40 1.436825323167711E-004 2.00 5.555100933167800E-004 1.99
$P^2$ 5 9.047609877074052E-004 - 4.297245174444950E-003 -
10 1.151394966919664E-004 2.97 5.375058641304305E-004 3.00
20 1.445715309857497E-005 2.99 6.924406859557769E-005 2.96
40 1.811270951788605E-006 3.00 8.720463021409203E-006 2.99
$\alpha=0.8$ $P^0$ 5 3.592329974624144E-002 - 8.449616965675322E-002 -
10 1.750510512702476E-002 1.04 4.245362255057922E-002 1.00
20 8.697106637946338E-003 1.01 2.125073937587364E-002 1.00
40 4.341672465121832E-003 1.00 1.062831369241851E-002 1.00
$P^1$ 5 9.120195825181981E-003 - 3.383289362730243E-002 -
10 2.294751340921533E-003 1.99 8.755789596454649E-003 1.95
20 5.745261460924934E-004 2.00 2.208566384755528E-003 1.98
40 1.436839091653192E-004 2.00 5.562652869576801E-004 1.99
$P^2$ 5 9.046409059470311E-004 - 4.297126983902264E-003 -
10 1.151376194022218E-004 2.97 5.374880423776833E-004 3.00
20 1.447012828175748E-005 2.99 6.924379906001369E-005 2.96
40 1.912757116440075E-006 2.99 8.835769827388040E-006 2.99
Table 3.  Spatial accuracy test on nonuniform meshes with generalized alternating numerical fluxes when $\delta = 0.3$, $\gamma = 2, M = 10^3, T = 1$
$\delta$ $\alpha$ $P^k$ $N$ $L^2$-error order $L^\infty$-error order
$\delta=0.3$ $\alpha=0.1$ $P^0$ 5 6.559598407976026E-002 - 0.141942066666751 -
10 2.141331033721447E-002 1.61 5.734028406382948E-002 1.30
20 9.793316970413680E-003 1.12 2.815183989101257E-002 1.02
40 4.809485138977877E-003 1.02 1.407535025139766E-002 1.00
$P^1$ 5 9.334237440748634E-003 - 3.145978397121429E-002 -
10 3.638112329117496E-003 1.36 1.339194646885009E-002 1.23
20 1.106145242636678E-003 1.72 4.300814221832788E-003 1.64
40 2.952217379902808E-004 1.91 1.195193749833484E-003 1.85
$P^2$ 5 1.010581921645606E-003 - 5.126434823465115E-003 -
10 1.068201999084790E-004 3.24 5.971277580741609E-004 3.10
20 1.389860346772117E-005 2.94 8.309553534868077E-005 2.85
40 1.770704698351656E-006 2.97 1.076235396982232E-005 2.95
$\alpha=0.6$ $P^0$ 5 6.519959540296516E-002 - 0.141364976011094 -
10 2.137597683554834E-002 1.60 5.728856602677920E-002 1.31
20 9.788419793457237E-003 1.12 2.814456788448857E-002 1.02
40 4.808850888477931E-003 1.01 1.407438548005000E-002 1.00
$P^1$ 5 9.324055653453555E-003 - 3.148494472151778E-002 -
10 3.637084108871119E-003 1.36 1.339218081832141E-002 1.23
20 1.106059577072876E-003 1.72 4.300878545495546E-003 1.64
40 2.952158819276407E-004 1.91 1.195178864173474E-003 1.85
$P^2$ 5 1.010440003914728E-003 - 5.125652210367676E-003 -
10 1.068162274307204E-004 3.23 5.971411497308199E-004 3.10
20 1.389837000772890E-005 2.94 8.309427296208810E-005 2.85
40 1.770454293076160E-006 2.97 1.076230665963618E-005 2.95
$\alpha=0.8$ $P^0$ 5 6.458019587494233E-002 - 0.140458685661883 -
10 2.131839260620296E-002 1.60 5.720848587853570E-002 1.31
20 9.780967395542408E-003 1.12 2.813343523512223E-002 1.01
40 4.807925152620669E-003 1.02 1.407295053444370E-002 1.00
$P^1$ 5 9.308221701165681E-003 - 3.152477270193341E-002 -
10 3.635461850529788E-003 1.36 1.339294605022746E-002 1.24
20 1.105916081128332E-003 1.72 4.301517739581207E-003 1.64
40 2.952039890812090E-004 1.91 1.195672409974230E-003 1.85
$P^2$ 5 1.010240608178436E-003 - 5.124773588667655E-003 -
10 1.068123075153382E-004 3.23 5.971640034306184E-004 3.10
20 1.390323465425386E-005 2.94 8.309265950586455E-005 2.85
40 1.809513967454312E-006 2.98 1.076227541254043E-005 2.95
Table Options

Download as excel

$\delta$ $\alpha$ $P^k$ $N$ $L^2$-error order $L^\infty$-error order
$\delta=0.3$ $\alpha=0.1$ $P^0$ 5 6.559598407976026E-002 - 0.141942066666751 -
10 2.141331033721447E-002 1.61 5.734028406382948E-002 1.30
20 9.793316970413680E-003 1.12 2.815183989101257E-002 1.02
40 4.809485138977877E-003 1.02 1.407535025139766E-002 1.00
$P^1$ 5 9.334237440748634E-003 - 3.145978397121429E-002 -
10 3.638112329117496E-003 1.36 1.339194646885009E-002 1.23
20 1.106145242636678E-003 1.72 4.300814221832788E-003 1.64
40 2.952217379902808E-004 1.91 1.195193749833484E-003 1.85
$P^2$ 5 1.010581921645606E-003 - 5.126434823465115E-003 -
10 1.068201999084790E-004 3.24 5.971277580741609E-004 3.10
20 1.389860346772117E-005 2.94 8.309553534868077E-005 2.85
40 1.770704698351656E-006 2.97 1.076235396982232E-005 2.95
$\alpha=0.6$ $P^0$ 5 6.519959540296516E-002 - 0.141364976011094 -
10 2.137597683554834E-002 1.60 5.728856602677920E-002 1.31
20 9.788419793457237E-003 1.12 2.814456788448857E-002 1.02
40 4.808850888477931E-003 1.01 1.407438548005000E-002 1.00
$P^1$ 5 9.324055653453555E-003 - 3.148494472151778E-002 -
10 3.637084108871119E-003 1.36 1.339218081832141E-002 1.23
20 1.106059577072876E-003 1.72 4.300878545495546E-003 1.64
40 2.952158819276407E-004 1.91 1.195178864173474E-003 1.85
$P^2$ 5 1.010440003914728E-003 - 5.125652210367676E-003 -
10 1.068162274307204E-004 3.23 5.971411497308199E-004 3.10
20 1.389837000772890E-005 2.94 8.309427296208810E-005 2.85
40 1.770454293076160E-006 2.97 1.076230665963618E-005 2.95
$\alpha=0.8$ $P^0$ 5 6.458019587494233E-002 - 0.140458685661883 -
10 2.131839260620296E-002 1.60 5.720848587853570E-002 1.31
20 9.780967395542408E-003 1.12 2.813343523512223E-002 1.01
40 4.807925152620669E-003 1.02 1.407295053444370E-002 1.00
$P^1$ 5 9.308221701165681E-003 - 3.152477270193341E-002 -
10 3.635461850529788E-003 1.36 1.339294605022746E-002 1.24
20 1.105916081128332E-003 1.72 4.301517739581207E-003 1.64
40 2.952039890812090E-004 1.91 1.195672409974230E-003 1.85
$P^2$ 5 1.010240608178436E-003 - 5.124773588667655E-003 -
10 1.068123075153382E-004 3.23 5.971640034306184E-004 3.10
20 1.390323465425386E-005 2.94 8.309265950586455E-005 2.85
40 1.809513967454312E-006 2.98 1.076227541254043E-005 2.95
Table 4.  Spatial accuracy test on nonuniform meshes with generalized alternating numerical fluxes when $\delta = 0.1$, $\gamma = 2, M = 10^3, T = 1$
$\delta$ $\alpha$ $P^k$ $N$ $L^2$-error order $L^\infty$-error order
$\delta=0.1$ $\alpha=0.1$ $P^0$ 5 4.554426032174388E-002 - 0.115718177138195 -
10 1.907614555969082E-002 1.25 5.320421957088832E-002 1.12
20 9.138240767269679E-003 1.06 2.598259449662434E-002 1.03
40 4.518863802087745E-003 1.01 1.291377789093143E-002 1.00
$P^1$ 5 8.849830180737654E-003 - 3.969655576082662E-002 -
10 2.670888776568979E-003 1.73 1.117674633593155E-002 1.83
20 6.856209305073176E-004 1.96 2.993783590210047E-003 1.90
40 1.726263868565285E-004 1.99 7.624154117570892E-004 1.97
$P^2$ 5 1.082053891229540E-003 - 5.632531555489165E-003 -
10 1.177827066011148E-004 3.20 7.864352387506149E-004 2.84
20 1.464825722091804E-005 3.01 9.550948635494300E-005 3.04
40 1.829209283100811E-006 3.00 1.207411590455412E-005 2.98
$\alpha=0.6$ $P^0$ 5 4.543056490078846E-002 - 0.115474889448670 -
10 1.906295169538061E-002 1.25 5.318082033209643E-002 1.12
20 9.136635333555037E-003 1.06 2.597982073437711E-002 1.03
40 4.518663596834055E-003 1.01 1.291343451385024E-002 1.00
$P^1$ 5 8.846862605510398E-003 - 3.970373991829590E-002 -
10 2.670694860720131E-003 1.73 1.117614841378017E-002 1.83
20 6.856086070180152E-004 1.96 2.993777705012829E-003 1.90
40 1.726256192263683E-004 1.99 7.623984725640964E-004 1.97
$P^2$ 5 1.081894553798753E-003 - 5.631794818602251E-003 -
10 1.177789297367418E-004 3.20 7.864212743115771E-004 2.84
20 1.464811122465675E-005 3.01 9.550366030672275E-005 3.04
40 1.828970584365630E-006 3.00 1.207133596128895E-005 2.99
$\alpha=0.8$ $P^0$ 5 4.525430019654393E-002 - 0.115095429944861 -
10 1.904269469568265E-002 1.25 5.314471217556128E-002 1.12
20 9.134222951010450E-003 1.06 2.597562042326319E-002 1.03
40 4.518387505390618E-003 1.01 1.291295179596993E-002 1.00
$P^1$ 5 8.842271383522345E-003 - 3.971560941693522E-002 -
10 2.670392762456530E-003 1.73 1.117577463774522E-002 1.83
20 6.855884088997946E-004 1.96 2.994298251659394E-003 1.90
40 1.726244848834557E-004 1.99 7.628868021073432E-004 1.97
$P^2$ 5 1.081660399859714E-003 - 5.630991561418289E-003 -
10 1.177745623909475E-004 3.20 7.864030096010258E-004 2.84
20 1.465280637729603E-005 3.01 9.565506409087154E-005 3.04
40 1.866808245534035E-006 3.00 1.214811102974098E-005 2.99
Table Options

Download as excel

$\delta$ $\alpha$ $P^k$ $N$ $L^2$-error order $L^\infty$-error order
$\delta=0.1$ $\alpha=0.1$ $P^0$ 5 4.554426032174388E-002 - 0.115718177138195 -
10 1.907614555969082E-002 1.25 5.320421957088832E-002 1.12
20 9.138240767269679E-003 1.06 2.598259449662434E-002 1.03
40 4.518863802087745E-003 1.01 1.291377789093143E-002 1.00
$P^1$ 5 8.849830180737654E-003 - 3.969655576082662E-002 -
10 2.670888776568979E-003 1.73 1.117674633593155E-002 1.83
20 6.856209305073176E-004 1.96 2.993783590210047E-003 1.90
40 1.726263868565285E-004 1.99 7.624154117570892E-004 1.97
$P^2$ 5 1.082053891229540E-003 - 5.632531555489165E-003 -
10 1.177827066011148E-004 3.20 7.864352387506149E-004 2.84
20 1.464825722091804E-005 3.01 9.550948635494300E-005 3.04
40 1.829209283100811E-006 3.00 1.207411590455412E-005 2.98
$\alpha=0.6$ $P^0$ 5 4.543056490078846E-002 - 0.115474889448670 -
10 1.906295169538061E-002 1.25 5.318082033209643E-002 1.12
20 9.136635333555037E-003 1.06 2.597982073437711E-002 1.03
40 4.518663596834055E-003 1.01 1.291343451385024E-002 1.00
$P^1$ 5 8.846862605510398E-003 - 3.970373991829590E-002 -
10 2.670694860720131E-003 1.73 1.117614841378017E-002 1.83
20 6.856086070180152E-004 1.96 2.993777705012829E-003 1.90
40 1.726256192263683E-004 1.99 7.623984725640964E-004 1.97
$P^2$ 5 1.081894553798753E-003 - 5.631794818602251E-003 -
10 1.177789297367418E-004 3.20 7.864212743115771E-004 2.84
20 1.464811122465675E-005 3.01 9.550366030672275E-005 3.04
40 1.828970584365630E-006 3.00 1.207133596128895E-005 2.99
$\alpha=0.8$ $P^0$ 5 4.525430019654393E-002 - 0.115095429944861 -
10 1.904269469568265E-002 1.25 5.314471217556128E-002 1.12
20 9.134222951010450E-003 1.06 2.597562042326319E-002 1.03
40 4.518387505390618E-003 1.01 1.291295179596993E-002 1.00
$P^1$ 5 8.842271383522345E-003 - 3.971560941693522E-002 -
10 2.670392762456530E-003 1.73 1.117577463774522E-002 1.83
20 6.855884088997946E-004 1.96 2.994298251659394E-003 1.90
40 1.726244848834557E-004 1.99 7.628868021073432E-004 1.97
$P^2$ 5 1.081660399859714E-003 - 5.630991561418289E-003 -
10 1.177745623909475E-004 3.20 7.864030096010258E-004 2.84
20 1.465280637729603E-005 3.01 9.565506409087154E-005 3.04
40 1.866808245534035E-006 3.00 1.214811102974098E-005 2.99
Table 5.  Temporal accuracy test using piecewise $P^2$ polynomials for the scheme (9) with generalized alternating numerical fluxes when $N = 100, T = 1.$
$\delta$ $\alpha$ $\tau$ $L^2$-error order $L^\infty$-error order
$\delta=0.1$ $\alpha=0.5$ 0.04 8.608763604447880E-006 - 1.219684581693636E-005 -
0.02 3.086574970641430E-006 1.48 4.409647689024299E-006 1.47
0.01 1.109311333958263E-006 1.48 1.667659212722938E-006 1.40
0.005 4.122054755449973E-007 1.43 6.985320445991206E-007 1.26
$\alpha=0.7$ 0.04 2.391687146347450E-005 - 3.383563665176892E-005 -
0.02 9.853827361471093E-006 1.28 1.395429884359922E-005 1.28
0.01 4.116933701786636E-006 1.26 5.856072709420346E-006 1.26
0.005 1.782609365838843E-006 1.21 2.587548893207003E-006 1.18
$\delta=0.3$ $\alpha=0.5$ 0.04 8.608382726939050E-006 - 1.217526939467639E-005 -
0.02 3.085511558119693E-006 1.48 4.377333736760303E-006 1.48
0.01 1.106348076087462E-006 1.48 1.601411114160456E-006 1.45
0.005 4.041621399151297E-007 1.45 6.654877294648420E-007 1.27
$\alpha=0.7$ 0.04 2.391673470774867E-005 - 3.382490687975359E-005 -
0.02 9.853494675524166E-006 1.28 1.393619582018557E-005 1.28
0.01 4.116136624036466E-006 1.26 5.832318129950220E-006 1.26
0.005 1.780767052630476E-006 1.21 2.542037339958725E-006 1.20
Table Options

Download as excel

$\delta$ $\alpha$ $\tau$ $L^2$-error order $L^\infty$-error order
$\delta=0.1$ $\alpha=0.5$ 0.04 8.608763604447880E-006 - 1.219684581693636E-005 -
0.02 3.086574970641430E-006 1.48 4.409647689024299E-006 1.47
0.01 1.109311333958263E-006 1.48 1.667659212722938E-006 1.40
0.005 4.122054755449973E-007 1.43 6.985320445991206E-007 1.26
$\alpha=0.7$ 0.04 2.391687146347450E-005 - 3.383563665176892E-005 -
0.02 9.853827361471093E-006 1.28 1.395429884359922E-005 1.28
0.01 4.116933701786636E-006 1.26 5.856072709420346E-006 1.26
0.005 1.782609365838843E-006 1.21 2.587548893207003E-006 1.18
$\delta=0.3$ $\alpha=0.5$ 0.04 8.608382726939050E-006 - 1.217526939467639E-005 -
0.02 3.085511558119693E-006 1.48 4.377333736760303E-006 1.48
0.01 1.106348076087462E-006 1.48 1.601411114160456E-006 1.45
0.005 4.041621399151297E-007 1.45 6.654877294648420E-007 1.27
$\alpha=0.7$ 0.04 2.391673470774867E-005 - 3.382490687975359E-005 -
0.02 9.853494675524166E-006 1.28 1.393619582018557E-005 1.28
0.01 4.116136624036466E-006 1.26 5.832318129950220E-006 1.26
0.005 1.780767052630476E-006 1.21 2.542037339958725E-006 1.20
Table 6.  Spatial accuracy test on uniform meshes with generalized alternating numerical fluxes when $\rho = 1, \delta = 0.2$, $\gamma = 2, M = 10^3, T = 1$
$\delta$ $\alpha$ $P^k$ $N$ $L^2$-error order $L^\infty$-error order
$\delta=0.2$ $\alpha=0.3$ $P^0$ 5 1.582340814827774E-003 - 3.587747814566711E-003 -
10 6.072920572041250E-004 1.38 1.361992544606309E-003 1.39
20 2.781722995839050E-004 1.12 6.593363827866452E-004 1.05
40 1.358688098753038E-004 1.03 3.262244021583708E-004 1.01
$P^1$ 5 2.976903263874860E-004 - 8.888076108539667E-004 -
10 9.380682880588326E-005 1.67 3.747599073017630E-004 1.25
20 2.570892164256014E-005 1.87 1.197734627369952E-004 1.65
40 6.616980217734994E-006 1.96 3.372607623089679E-005 1.83
$P^2$ 5 3.744225938986966E-005 - 2.066750403204734E-004 -
10 4.242629022151605E-006 3.14 2.905747077063567E-005 2.83
20 5.108240307324746E-007 3.05 3.733062412131737E-006 2.96
40 1.404276778729993E-007 1.86 4.548930764244681E-007 3.03
$\alpha=0.5$ $P^0$ 5 1.576014035107718E-003 - 3.577323483172182E-003 -
10 6.065883866688050E-004 1.38 1.361430273966585E-003 1.39
20 2.780870829316098E-004 1.12 6.589782886991372E-004 1.05
40 1.358586702912018E-004 1.03 3.262537733518698E-004 1.01
$P^1$ 5 2.975626899907474E-004 - 8.888043631958508E-004 -
10 9.379482889619085E-005 1.68 3.746166818088215E-004 1.25
20 2.570772139874646E-005 1.87 1.196172349767182E-004 1.65
40 6.615791862540715E-006 1.96 3.356898366286719E-005 1.83
$P^2$ 5 3.743605733712328E-005 - 2.068108840347286E-004 -
10 4.240769769090305E-006 3.14 2.921541320911186E-005 2.82
20 4.961774292224783E-007 3.09 3.890639954380062E-006 2.90
40 7.051223319124203E-008 2.81 5.312153408062071E-007 2.87
$\alpha=0.7$ $P^0$ 5 1.569573150535817E-003 - 3.566532563472458E-003 -
10 6.058781928822529E-004 1.37 1.361570566765813E-003 1.39
20 2.780022433132069E-004 1.12 6.584717897009694E-004 1.04
40 1.358494586510882E-004 1.03 3.265674113640243E-004 1.01
$P^1$ 5 2.974342179950080E-004 - 8.886664664762281E-004 -
10 9.378333026032094E-005 1.67 3.743331911596685E-004 1.25
20 2.570912149705274E-005 1.87 1.193198577654686E-004 1.65
40 6.624911739109129E-006 1.96 3.327059953717988E-005 1.84
$P^2$ 5 3.743175301428064E-005 - 2.070928579500273E-004 -
10 4.255010460194694E-006 3.13 2.951598305808386E-005 2.81
20 6.067267031675130E-007 2.81 4.189879914070192E-006 2.82
40 8.591886309964037E-008 2.82 6.269178180106001E-007 2.74
Table Options

Download as excel

$\delta$ $\alpha$ $P^k$ $N$ $L^2$-error order $L^\infty$-error order
$\delta=0.2$ $\alpha=0.3$ $P^0$ 5 1.582340814827774E-003 - 3.587747814566711E-003 -
10 6.072920572041250E-004 1.38 1.361992544606309E-003 1.39
20 2.781722995839050E-004 1.12 6.593363827866452E-004 1.05
40 1.358688098753038E-004 1.03 3.262244021583708E-004 1.01
$P^1$ 5 2.976903263874860E-004 - 8.888076108539667E-004 -
10 9.380682880588326E-005 1.67 3.747599073017630E-004 1.25
20 2.570892164256014E-005 1.87 1.197734627369952E-004 1.65
40 6.616980217734994E-006 1.96 3.372607623089679E-005 1.83
$P^2$ 5 3.744225938986966E-005 - 2.066750403204734E-004 -
10 4.242629022151605E-006 3.14 2.905747077063567E-005 2.83
20 5.108240307324746E-007 3.05 3.733062412131737E-006 2.96
40 1.404276778729993E-007 1.86 4.548930764244681E-007 3.03
$\alpha=0.5$ $P^0$ 5 1.576014035107718E-003 - 3.577323483172182E-003 -
10 6.065883866688050E-004 1.38 1.361430273966585E-003 1.39
20 2.780870829316098E-004 1.12 6.589782886991372E-004 1.05
40 1.358586702912018E-004 1.03 3.262537733518698E-004 1.01
$P^1$ 5 2.975626899907474E-004 - 8.888043631958508E-004 -
10 9.379482889619085E-005 1.68 3.746166818088215E-004 1.25
20 2.570772139874646E-005 1.87 1.196172349767182E-004 1.65
40 6.615791862540715E-006 1.96 3.356898366286719E-005 1.83
$P^2$ 5 3.743605733712328E-005 - 2.068108840347286E-004 -
10 4.240769769090305E-006 3.14 2.921541320911186E-005 2.82
20 4.961774292224783E-007 3.09 3.890639954380062E-006 2.90
40 7.051223319124203E-008 2.81 5.312153408062071E-007 2.87
$\alpha=0.7$ $P^0$ 5 1.569573150535817E-003 - 3.566532563472458E-003 -
10 6.058781928822529E-004 1.37 1.361570566765813E-003 1.39
20 2.780022433132069E-004 1.12 6.584717897009694E-004 1.04
40 1.358494586510882E-004 1.03 3.265674113640243E-004 1.01
$P^1$ 5 2.974342179950080E-004 - 8.886664664762281E-004 -
10 9.378333026032094E-005 1.67 3.743331911596685E-004 1.25
20 2.570912149705274E-005 1.87 1.193198577654686E-004 1.65
40 6.624911739109129E-006 1.96 3.327059953717988E-005 1.84
$P^2$ 5 3.743175301428064E-005 - 2.070928579500273E-004 -
10 4.255010460194694E-006 3.13 2.951598305808386E-005 2.81
20 6.067267031675130E-007 2.81 4.189879914070192E-006 2.82
40 8.591886309964037E-008 2.82 6.269178180106001E-007 2.74
Table 7.  Spatial accuracy test on uniform meshes with generalized alternating numerical fluxes when $\rho = 1, \delta = 0.6$, $\gamma = 2, M = 10^3, T = 1$
$\delta$ $\alpha$ $P^k$ $N$ $L^2$-error order $L^\infty$-error order
$\delta=0.6$ $\alpha=0.3$ $P^0$ 5 2.263070303841627E-003 - 4.577360163679048E-003 -
10 6.707774222704496E-004 1.75 1.436684775454216E-003 1.67
20 2.853444715298516E-004 1.23 6.606848412090876E-004 1.12
40 1.367407768126421E-004 1.06 3.273628226099778E-004 1.01
$P^1$ 5 2.974509312553489E-004 - 7.150301084008492E-004 -
10 1.271245501318707E-004 1.22 3.981226597552988E-004 0.84
20 5.095203810569959E-005 1.32 1.756826753133757E-004 1.18
40 1.628155726102348E-005 1.65 6.113921628532708E-005 1.52
$P^2$ 5 4.741117314917393E-005 - 2.322474249148421E-004 -
10 5.251072284968953E-006 3.17 3.482052702302946E-005 2.73
20 5.487061550738519E-007 3.26 4.391297775017012E-006 2.99
40 1.398475833157788E-007 1.97 5.076183265380021E-007 3.11
$\alpha=0.5$ $P^0$ 5 2.244975493970608E-003 - 4.553595493445027E-003 -
10 6.694913740987843E-004 1.75 1.433071024540420E-003 1.66
20 2.851933816998400E-004 1.23 6.606969556207020E-004 1.12
40 1.367226188180968E-004 1.06 3.275293007699463E-004 1.01
$P^1$ 5 2.970077416293948E-004 - 7.150618409357242E-004 -
10 1.270399125198733E-004 1.23 3.980425972542222E-004 0.85
20 5.093888725451710E-005 1.32 1.755280846267336E-004 1.18
40 1.627971177773421E-005 1.65 6.098150580908531E-005 1.53
$P^2$ 5 4.738891552206912E-005 - 2.323268736959109E-004 -
10 5.248488428614583E-006 3.17 3.497357272207592E-005 2.73
20 5.350808403013323E-007 3.29 4.548739501698698E-006 2.94
40 6.934968715889372E-008 2.95 6.122329160500268E-007 2.89
$\alpha=0.7$ $P^0$ 5 2.226364987023399E-003 - 4.528968446397434E-003 -
10 6.681909572138881E-004 1.73 1.429260382731581E-003 1.66
20 2.850422396157703E-004 1.23 6.608559171080138E-004 1.11
40 1.367054729489756E-004 1.06 3.278432462824107E-004 1.01
$P^1$ 5 2.965586452297552E-004 - 7.149566598926194E-004 -
10 1.269543669818585E-004 1.22 3.978234263835360E-004 0.85
20 5.092673020318355E-005 1.32 1.752325021227329E-004 1.18
40 1.628197579228578E-005 1.65 6.068249513503552E-005 1.53
$P^2$ 5 4.736816730385127E-005 - 2.325522068324162E-004 -
10 5.258924978488712E-006 3.17 3.526923646273578E-005 2.72
20 6.389205641380220E-007 3.04 4.847842978104736E-006 2.86
40 8.501389966985875E-008 2.91 6.585375965448209E-007 2.88
Table Options

Download as excel

$\delta$ $\alpha$ $P^k$ $N$ $L^2$-error order $L^\infty$-error order
$\delta=0.6$ $\alpha=0.3$ $P^0$ 5 2.263070303841627E-003 - 4.577360163679048E-003 -
10 6.707774222704496E-004 1.75 1.436684775454216E-003 1.67
20 2.853444715298516E-004 1.23 6.606848412090876E-004 1.12
40 1.367407768126421E-004 1.06 3.273628226099778E-004 1.01
$P^1$ 5 2.974509312553489E-004 - 7.150301084008492E-004 -
10 1.271245501318707E-004 1.22 3.981226597552988E-004 0.84
20 5.095203810569959E-005 1.32 1.756826753133757E-004 1.18
40 1.628155726102348E-005 1.65 6.113921628532708E-005 1.52
$P^2$ 5 4.741117314917393E-005 - 2.322474249148421E-004 -
10 5.251072284968953E-006 3.17 3.482052702302946E-005 2.73
20 5.487061550738519E-007 3.26 4.391297775017012E-006 2.99
40 1.398475833157788E-007 1.97 5.076183265380021E-007 3.11
$\alpha=0.5$ $P^0$ 5 2.244975493970608E-003 - 4.553595493445027E-003 -
10 6.694913740987843E-004 1.75 1.433071024540420E-003 1.66
20 2.851933816998400E-004 1.23 6.606969556207020E-004 1.12
40 1.367226188180968E-004 1.06 3.275293007699463E-004 1.01
$P^1$ 5 2.970077416293948E-004 - 7.150618409357242E-004 -
10 1.270399125198733E-004 1.23 3.980425972542222E-004 0.85
20 5.093888725451710E-005 1.32 1.755280846267336E-004 1.18
40 1.627971177773421E-005 1.65 6.098150580908531E-005 1.53
$P^2$ 5 4.738891552206912E-005 - 2.323268736959109E-004 -
10 5.248488428614583E-006 3.17 3.497357272207592E-005 2.73
20 5.350808403013323E-007 3.29 4.548739501698698E-006 2.94
40 6.934968715889372E-008 2.95 6.122329160500268E-007 2.89
$\alpha=0.7$ $P^0$ 5 2.226364987023399E-003 - 4.528968446397434E-003 -
10 6.681909572138881E-004 1.73 1.429260382731581E-003 1.66
20 2.850422396157703E-004 1.23 6.608559171080138E-004 1.11
40 1.367054729489756E-004 1.06 3.278432462824107E-004 1.01
$P^1$ 5 2.965586452297552E-004 - 7.149566598926194E-004 -
10 1.269543669818585E-004 1.22 3.978234263835360E-004 0.85
20 5.092673020318355E-005 1.32 1.752325021227329E-004 1.18
40 1.628197579228578E-005 1.65 6.068249513503552E-005 1.53
$P^2$ 5 4.736816730385127E-005 - 2.325522068324162E-004 -
10 5.258924978488712E-006 3.17 3.526923646273578E-005 2.72
20 6.389205641380220E-007 3.04 4.847842978104736E-006 2.86
40 8.501389966985875E-008 2.91 6.585375965448209E-007 2.88
Table 8.  Spatial accuracy test on nonuniform meshes with generalized alternating numerical fluxes when $\rho = 1, \delta = 0.2$, $\gamma = 2, M = 10^3, T = 1$
$\delta$ $\alpha$ $P^k$ $N$ $L^2$-error order $L^\infty$-error order
$\delta=0.2$ $\alpha=0.3$ $P^0$ 5 1.517845954000122E-003 - 3.511606734885603E-003 -
10 6.227976716020462E-004 1.28 1.670434180879555E-003 1.07
20 2.917321657674542E-004 1.09 8.185201216153321E-004 1.02
40 1.431224670285340E-004 1.02 4.068120471581059E-004 1.01
$P^1$ 5 3.242733095936642E-004 - 1.031247407943849E-003 -
10 9.642143896521544E-005 1.75 4.664783993685712E-004 1.14
20 2.638283335064153E-005 1.87 1.497589900759262E-004 1.64
40 6.784781440645293E-006 1.96 4.208948155767745E-005 1.83
$P^2$ 5 4.371291470422284E-005 - 2.205191157852509E-004 -
10 4.737332465461207E-006 3.21 5.279340967235548E-005 2.06
20 5.836666419066179E-007 3.02 6.846287374035127E-006 2.95
40 1.451353937788389E-007 2.01 7.721987122251807E-007 3.14
$\alpha=0.5$ $P^0$ 5 1.511832756597273E-003 - 3.502121979914235E-003 -
10 6.220893257475209E-004 1.28 1.670078148163840E-003 1.06
20 2.916417957441209E-004 1.09 8.186795059360371E-004 1.03
40 1.431115461417255E-004 1.03 4.069902921658920E-004 1.01
$P^1$ 5 3.241445818441831E-004 - 1.031010873877333E-003 -
10 9.640915416227526E-005 1.75 4.663237471849166E-004 1.14
20 2.638161337326710E-005 1.87 1.496019341579287E-004 1.64
40 6.783621296347129E-006 1.96 4.193227445160367E-005 1.83
$P^2$ 5 4.370398829079597E-005 - 2.206503138086216E-004 -
10 4.735605756347349E-006 3.21 5.295075267031514E-005 2.06
20 5.708884776768829E-007 3.05 7.003847236448262E-006 2.92
40 7.947531188294052E-008 2.84 9.294866692183973E-007 2.91
$\alpha=0.7$ $P^0$ 5 1.505710253623656E-003 - 3.492298886676585E-003 -
10 6.213745175059577E-004 1.28 1.669866295206499E-003 1.06
20 2.915517673954438E-004 1.09 8.189868083813912E-004 1.03
40 1.431015120142753E-004 1.03 4.073153866903747E-004 1.01
$P^1$ 5 3.240154726586564E-004 - 1.030637501521249E-003 -
10 9.639741117415519E-005 1.75 4.660275194837704E-004 1.15
20 2.638293775032076E-005 1.87 1.493034254027140E-004 1.64
40 6.792517114587242E-006 1.96 4.163370092550497E-005 1.84
$P^2$ 5 4.369666230527429E-005 - 2.209276622101592E-004 -
10 4.748293818147065E-006 3.20 5.325073483141655E-005 2.05
20 6.692039201471664E-007 2.83 7.303070295557957E-006 2.87
40 8.581080963134642E-008 2.96 9.228188670033924E-007 2.98
Table Options

Download as excel

$\delta$ $\alpha$ $P^k$ $N$ $L^2$-error order $L^\infty$-error order
$\delta=0.2$ $\alpha=0.3$ $P^0$ 5 1.517845954000122E-003 - 3.511606734885603E-003 -
10 6.227976716020462E-004 1.28 1.670434180879555E-003 1.07
20 2.917321657674542E-004 1.09 8.185201216153321E-004 1.02
40 1.431224670285340E-004 1.02 4.068120471581059E-004 1.01
$P^1$ 5 3.242733095936642E-004 - 1.031247407943849E-003 -
10 9.642143896521544E-005 1.75 4.664783993685712E-004 1.14
20 2.638283335064153E-005 1.87 1.497589900759262E-004 1.64
40 6.784781440645293E-006 1.96 4.208948155767745E-005 1.83
$P^2$ 5 4.371291470422284E-005 - 2.205191157852509E-004 -
10 4.737332465461207E-006 3.21 5.279340967235548E-005 2.06
20 5.836666419066179E-007 3.02 6.846287374035127E-006 2.95
40 1.451353937788389E-007 2.01 7.721987122251807E-007 3.14
$\alpha=0.5$ $P^0$ 5 1.511832756597273E-003 - 3.502121979914235E-003 -
10 6.220893257475209E-004 1.28 1.670078148163840E-003 1.06
20 2.916417957441209E-004 1.09 8.186795059360371E-004 1.03
40 1.431115461417255E-004 1.03 4.069902921658920E-004 1.01
$P^1$ 5 3.241445818441831E-004 - 1.031010873877333E-003 -
10 9.640915416227526E-005 1.75 4.663237471849166E-004 1.14
20 2.638161337326710E-005 1.87 1.496019341579287E-004 1.64
40 6.783621296347129E-006 1.96 4.193227445160367E-005 1.83
$P^2$ 5 4.370398829079597E-005 - 2.206503138086216E-004 -
10 4.735605756347349E-006 3.21 5.295075267031514E-005 2.06
20 5.708884776768829E-007 3.05 7.003847236448262E-006 2.92
40 7.947531188294052E-008 2.84 9.294866692183973E-007 2.91
$\alpha=0.7$ $P^0$ 5 1.505710253623656E-003 - 3.492298886676585E-003 -
10 6.213745175059577E-004 1.28 1.669866295206499E-003 1.06
20 2.915517673954438E-004 1.09 8.189868083813912E-004 1.03
40 1.431015120142753E-004 1.03 4.073153866903747E-004 1.01
$P^1$ 5 3.240154726586564E-004 - 1.030637501521249E-003 -
10 9.639741117415519E-005 1.75 4.660275194837704E-004 1.15
20 2.638293775032076E-005 1.87 1.493034254027140E-004 1.64
40 6.792517114587242E-006 1.96 4.163370092550497E-005 1.84
$P^2$ 5 4.369666230527429E-005 - 2.209276622101592E-004 -
10 4.748293818147065E-006 3.20 5.325073483141655E-005 2.05
20 6.692039201471664E-007 2.83 7.303070295557957E-006 2.87
40 8.581080963134642E-008 2.96 9.228188670033924E-007 2.98
Table 9.  Spatial accuracy test on nonuniform meshes with generalized alternating numerical fluxes when $\rho = 1, \delta = 0.6$ $\gamma = 2, M = 10^3, T = 1$
$\delta$ $\alpha$ $P^k$ $N$ $L^2$-error order $L^\infty$-error order
$\delta=0.6$ $\alpha=0.3$ $P^0$ 5 2.218435560209597E-003 - 4.988165866475595E-003 -
10 7.026515160120938E-004 1.66 1.615537336821858E-003 1.63
20 3.238249412680320E-004 1.12 9.344015225186842E-004 0.79
40 1.711992658914959E-004 0.92 5.144905069215206E-004 0.86
$P^1$ 5 3.213669677505128E-004 - 6.232490424656974E-004 -
10 1.281866059118811E-004 1.33 3.003107660959630E-004 1.05
20 5.143385599212686E-005 1.32 1.603700097095964E-004 0.91
40 1.645991800902195E-005 1.64 5.811184200627087E-005 1.46
$P^2$ 5 5.667492210358004E-005 - 3.505324110815492E-004 -
10 5.578235035051399E-006 3.17 4.414888437790894E-005 2.99
20 7.175666478549729E-007 3.26 5.738400869813071E-006 2.94
40 1.571281022897026E-007 2.19 8.425543243264881E-007 2.77
$\alpha=0.5$ $P^0$ 5 2.200335979338480E-003 - 4.956964974689847E-003 -
10 7.011795560405282E-004 1.64 1.611200638415444E-003 1.62
20 3.235547410371371E-004 1.12 9.339361814586587E-004 0.79
40 1.711432886897817E-004 0.92 5.145417733177721E-004 0.86
$P^1$ 5 3.208864422126183E-004 - 6.227158645046031E-004 -
10 1.280994719241301E-004 1.32 3.001105667075760E-004 1.05
20 5.142050916436299E-005 1.32 1.602085136691192E-004 0.91
40 1.645805875671424E-005 1.64 5.795371024010622E-005 1.47
$P^2$ 5 5.664565316990849E-005 - 3.502258146088582E-004 -
10 5.576080115885499E-006 3.34 4.398437752902102E-005 2.99
20 7.071821450175616E-007 2.98 5.873580067984358E-006 2.90
40 9.970460744355951E-008 2.83 8.509068596339163E-007 2.79
$\alpha=0.7$ $P^0$ 5 2.181711723758149E-003 - 4.924677437389718E-003 -
10 6.996904701082016E-004 1.63 1.606649219131593E-003 1.62
20 3.232837185701581E-004 1.11 9.336145912944857E-004 0.78
40 1.710880587147894E-004 0.92 5.147405087257530E-004 0.86
$P^1$ 5 3.203996862436910E-004 - 6.223220958377807E-004 -
10 1.280113679639955E-004 1.32 2.997662559044798E-004 1.05
20 5.140813415494180E-005 1.32 1.599050123649873E-004 0.91
40 1.646026145542672E-005 1.64 5.765402843328131E-005 1.47
$P^2$ 5 5.661762164027293E-005 - 3.497734484754480E-004 -
10 5.586181252970688E-006 3.34 4.367727087437284E-005 3.00
20 7.886608314227983E-007 2.82 6.172794085018479E-006 2.82
40 9.631333432841155E-008 3.03 1.149606829718052E-006 2.42
Table Options

Download as excel

$\delta$ $\alpha$ $P^k$ $N$ $L^2$-error order $L^\infty$-error order
$\delta=0.6$ $\alpha=0.3$ $P^0$ 5 2.218435560209597E-003 - 4.988165866475595E-003 -
10 7.026515160120938E-004 1.66 1.615537336821858E-003 1.63
20 3.238249412680320E-004 1.12 9.344015225186842E-004 0.79
40 1.711992658914959E-004 0.92 5.144905069215206E-004 0.86
$P^1$ 5 3.213669677505128E-004 - 6.232490424656974E-004 -
10 1.281866059118811E-004 1.33 3.003107660959630E-004 1.05
20 5.143385599212686E-005 1.32 1.603700097095964E-004 0.91
40 1.645991800902195E-005 1.64 5.811184200627087E-005 1.46
$P^2$ 5 5.667492210358004E-005 - 3.505324110815492E-004 -
10 5.578235035051399E-006 3.17 4.414888437790894E-005 2.99
20 7.175666478549729E-007 3.26 5.738400869813071E-006 2.94
40 1.571281022897026E-007 2.19 8.425543243264881E-007 2.77
$\alpha=0.5$ $P^0$ 5 2.200335979338480E-003 - 4.956964974689847E-003 -
10 7.011795560405282E-004 1.64 1.611200638415444E-003 1.62
20 3.235547410371371E-004 1.12 9.339361814586587E-004 0.79
40 1.711432886897817E-004 0.92 5.145417733177721E-004 0.86
$P^1$ 5 3.208864422126183E-004 - 6.227158645046031E-004 -
10 1.280994719241301E-004 1.32 3.001105667075760E-004 1.05
20 5.142050916436299E-005 1.32 1.602085136691192E-004 0.91
40 1.645805875671424E-005 1.64 5.795371024010622E-005 1.47
$P^2$ 5 5.664565316990849E-005 - 3.502258146088582E-004 -
10 5.576080115885499E-006 3.34 4.398437752902102E-005 2.99
20 7.071821450175616E-007 2.98 5.873580067984358E-006 2.90
40 9.970460744355951E-008 2.83 8.509068596339163E-007 2.79
$\alpha=0.7$ $P^0$ 5 2.181711723758149E-003 - 4.924677437389718E-003 -
10 6.996904701082016E-004 1.63 1.606649219131593E-003 1.62
20 3.232837185701581E-004 1.11 9.336145912944857E-004 0.78
40 1.710880587147894E-004 0.92 5.147405087257530E-004 0.86
$P^1$ 5 3.203996862436910E-004 - 6.223220958377807E-004 -
10 1.280113679639955E-004 1.32 2.997662559044798E-004 1.05
20 5.140813415494180E-005 1.32 1.599050123649873E-004 0.91
40 1.646026145542672E-005 1.64 5.765402843328131E-005 1.47
$P^2$ 5 5.661762164027293E-005 - 3.497734484754480E-004 -
10 5.586181252970688E-006 3.34 4.367727087437284E-005 3.00
20 7.886608314227983E-007 2.82 6.172794085018479E-006 2.82
40 9.631333432841155E-008 3.03 1.149606829718052E-006 2.42
[1]

Zexuan Liu, Zhiyuan Sun, Jerry Zhijian Yang. A numerical study of superconvergence of the discontinuous Galerkin method by patch reconstruction. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (4) : 1487-1501. doi: 10.3934/era.2020078
[2]

Yue Feng, Yujie Liu, Ruishu Wang, Shangyou Zhang. A conforming discontinuous Galerkin finite element method on rectangular partitions. Electronic Research Archive, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/era.2020120
[3]

Alberto Bressan, Wen Shen. A posteriori error estimates for self-similar solutions to the Euler equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (1) : 113-130. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020168
[4]

Shenglan Xie, Maoan Han, Peng Zhu. A posteriori error estimate of weak Galerkin fem for second order elliptic problem with mixed boundary condition. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020340
[5]

Reza Chaharpashlou, Abdon Atangana, Reza Saadati. On the fuzzy stability results for fractional stochastic Volterra integral equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020432
[6]

Lihong Zhang, Wenwen Hou, Bashir Ahmad, Guotao Wang. Radial symmetry for logarithmic Choquard equation involving a generalized tempered fractional $ p $-Laplacian. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020445
[7]

Abdelghafour Atlas, Mostafa Bendahmane, Fahd Karami, Driss Meskine, Omar Oubbih. A nonlinear fractional reaction-diffusion system applied to image denoising and decomposition. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020321
[8]

Huiying Fan, Tao Ma. Parabolic equations involving Laguerre operators and weighted mixed-norm estimates. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (12) : 5487-5508. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020249
[9]

Weisong Dong, Chang Li. Second order estimates for complex Hessian equations on Hermitian manifolds. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020377
[10]

Scipio Cuccagna, Masaya Maeda. A survey on asymptotic stability of ground states of nonlinear Schrödinger equations II. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020450
[11]

Xavier Carvajal, Liliana Esquivel, Raphael Santos. On local well-posedness and ill-posedness results for a coupled system of mkdv type equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020382
[12]

S. Sadeghi, H. Jafari, S. Nemati. Solving fractional Advection-diffusion equation using Genocchi operational matrix based on Atangana-Baleanu derivative. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020435
[13]

Li-Bin Liu, Ying Liang, Jian Zhang, Xiaobing Bao. A robust adaptive grid method for singularly perturbed Burger-Huxley equations. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (4) : 1439-1457. doi: 10.3934/era.2020076
[14]

Serena Dipierro, Benedetta Pellacci, Enrico Valdinoci, Gianmaria Verzini. Time-fractional equations with reaction terms: Fundamental solutions and asymptotics. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (1) : 257-275. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020137
[15]

Bahaaeldin Abdalla, Thabet Abdeljawad. Oscillation criteria for kernel function dependent fractional dynamic equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020443
[16]

Lin Shi, Xuemin Wang, Dingshi Li. Limiting behavior of non-autonomous stochastic reaction-diffusion equations with colored noise on unbounded thin domains. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (12) : 5367-5386. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020242
[17]

Marion Darbas, Jérémy Heleine, Stephanie Lohrengel. Numerical resolution by the quasi-reversibility method of a data completion problem for Maxwell's equations. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2020, 14 (6) : 1107-1133. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020056
[18]

Hoang The Tuan. On the asymptotic behavior of solutions to time-fractional elliptic equations driven by a multiplicative white noise. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020318
[19]

Thierry Cazenave, Ivan Naumkin. Local smooth solutions of the nonlinear Klein-gordon equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020448
[20]

Mehdi Bastani, Davod Khojasteh Salkuyeh. On the GSOR iteration method for image restoration. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (1) : 27-43. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020013

2019 Impact Factor: 1.27

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (11)
  • HTML views (26)
  • Cited by (0)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2020 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences