doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020321

A nonlinear fractional reaction-diffusion system applied to image denoising and decomposition

1. 

Ecole Nationale des Sciences Appliquées de Marrakech, Université Cadi Ayyad, B.P. 575 Avenue Abdelkrim Al Khattabi Marrakech, Morocco

2. 

Institut de Mathématiques de Bordeaux and INRIA-Carmen Bordeaux Sud-Ouest, Université de Bordeaux, 33076 Bordeaux Cedex, France

3. 

Ecole Supérieure de Technologie d'Essaouira, Université Cadi Ayyad, B.P. 383 Essaouira El Jadida, Essaouira, Morocco

* Corresponding author: Fahd Karami

Received  May 2020 Revised  July 2020 Published  November 2020

This paper is devoted to the mathematical and numerical study of a new proposed model based on a fractional diffusion equation coupled with a nonlinear regularization of the Total Variation operator. This model is primarily intended to introduce a weak norm in the fidelity term, where this norm is considered more appropriate for capturing very oscillatory characteristics interpreted as a texture. Furthermore, our proposed model profits from the benefits of a variable exponent used to distinguish the features of the image. By using Faedo-Galerkin method, we prove the well-posedness (existence and uniqueness) of the weak solution for the proposed model. Based on the alternating direction implicit method of Peaceman-Rachford and the approximations of the Gr$ \ddot{u} $nwald-Letnikov operators, we develop the numerical discretization of our fractional diffusion equation. Experimental results claim that our model provides high-quality results in cartoon-texture-edges decomposition and image denoising. In particular, our model can successfully reduce the staircase phenomenon during the image denoising. Furthermore, small details, texture and fine structures still maintained in the restored image. Finally, we compare our numerical results with the existing models in the literature.

Citation: Abdelghafour Atlas, Mostafa Bendahmane, Fahd Karami, Driss Meskine, Omar Oubbih. A nonlinear fractional reaction-diffusion system applied to image denoising and decomposition. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020321
References:
[1]

R. AboulaichD. Meskine and A. Souissi, New diffusion models in image processing, Comput. Math. Appl., 56 (2008), 874-882.  doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2008.01.017.  Google Scholar

[2] R. A. Adams, Sobolev Spaces, Ac. Press, New york, 1975.   Google Scholar
[3]

L. AfraitesA. AtlasF. Karami and D. Meskine, Some class of parabolic systems applied to image processing, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B, 21 (2016), 1671-1687.  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016017.  Google Scholar

[4]

L. AlvarezP.-L. Lions and J.-M. Morel, Image selective smoothing and edge detection by nonlinear diffusion. Ⅱ, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 29 (1992), 845-866.  doi: 10.1137/0729052.  Google Scholar

[5]

F. AndreuC. BallesterV. Caselles and J. M. Mazón, Minimizing total variation flow, Differential Integral Equations, 14 (2001), 321-360.   Google Scholar

[6]

N. Aronszajn, Boundary values of functions with finite Dirichlet integral, Techn. Report of Univ. of Kansas, 14 (1955), 77-94.   Google Scholar

[7]

G. Aubert and J.-F. Aujol, Modeling very oscillating signals. Application to image processing, Appl. Math. Optim., 51 (2005), 163-182.  doi: 10.1007/s00245-004-0812-z.  Google Scholar

[8]

J.-F. AujolG. AubertL. Blanc-Féraud and A. Chambolle, Image decomposition into a bounded variation component and an oscillating component, J. Math. Imaging Vision, 22 (2005), 71-88.  doi: 10.1007/s10851-005-4783-8.  Google Scholar

[9]

A. BuadesB. Coll and J. M. Morel, A non-local algorithm for image denoising, IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2 (2005), 60-65.   Google Scholar

[10]

A. Chambolle, R. A. DeVore, N.-Y. Lee and B. J. Lucier, Nonlinear wavelet image processing: Variational problems, compression, and noise removal through wavelet shrinkage, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 7 (1998), 319–335. doi: 10.1109/83.661182.  Google Scholar

[11]

E. A. Coddington and N. Levinson, Theory of ordinary differential equations, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York-Toronto-London, (1955).  Google Scholar

[12]

E. Di NezzaG. Palatucci and E. Valdinoci, Hitchhiker's guide to the fractional Sobolev spaces, Bull. Sci. Math., 136 (2012), 521-573.  doi: 10.1016/j.bulsci.2011.12.004.  Google Scholar

[13]

K. Diethelm, The Analysis of Fractional Differential Equations, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, (2010). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-14574-2.  Google Scholar

[14]

S. DipierroX. Ros-Oton and E. Valdinoci, Nonlocal problems with Neumann boundary conditions, Rev. Mat. Iberoam., 33 (2017), 377-416.  doi: 10.4171/RMI/942.  Google Scholar

[15]

D. L. Donoho, De-noising by soft-thresholding, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 41 (1995), 613-627.  doi: 10.1109/18.382009.  Google Scholar

[16]

A. Elmahi and D. Meskine, Parabolic equations in Orlicz spaces, J. London Math. Soc. (2), 72 (2005), 410-428.  doi: 10.1112/S0024610705006630.  Google Scholar

[17]

A. ElmoatazX. Desquesnes and O. Lézoray, Non-Local Morphological PDEs and $p$-Laplacian Equation on Graphs With Applications in Image Processing and Machine Learning, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 6 (2012), 764-779.  doi: 10.1109/JSTSP.2012.2216504.  Google Scholar

[18]

E. Gagliardo, Ulteriori proprietà di alcune classi di funzioni in più variabili, Ricerche Mat., 8 (1959), 24-51.   Google Scholar

[19]

J. B. GarnettP. W. JonesT. M. Le and L. A Vese, Modeling oscillatory components with the homogeneous spaces $B\dot MO^{-\alpha}$ and $\dot W{}^{-\alpha,p}$, Pure Appl. Math. Q., 7 (2011), 275-318.  doi: 10.4310/PAMQ.2011.v7.n2.a2.  Google Scholar

[20]

J. B. GarnettT. M. LeY. Meyer and L. A Vese, Image decompositions using bounded variation and generalized homogeneous Besov spaces, Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal., 23 (2007), 25-56.  doi: 10.1016/j.acha.2007.01.005.  Google Scholar

[21]

Y. GigaM. Muszkieta and P. Rybka, A duality based approach to the minimizing total variation flow in the space $H^{-s}$, Jpn. J. Ind. Appl. Math., 36 (2019), 261-286.  doi: 10.1007/s13160-018-00340-4.  Google Scholar

[22]

G. Gilboa and S. Osher, Nonlocal linear image regularization and supervised segmentation, Multiscale Model. Simul., 6 (2007), 595-630.  doi: 10.1137/060669358.  Google Scholar

[23]

G. Gilboa and S. Osher, Nonlocal operators with applications to image processing, Multiscale Model. Simul., 7 (2008), 1005-1028.  doi: 10.1137/070698592.  Google Scholar

[24]

J.-P. Gossez, Nonlinear elliptic boundary value problems for equations with rapidly (or slowly) increasing coefficients, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 190 (1974), 163-205.  doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-1974-0342854-2.  Google Scholar

[25]

Z. GuoJ. Yin and Q. Liu, On a reaction-diffusion system applied to image decomposition and restoration, Math. Comput. Modelling, 53 (2011), 1336-1350.  doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2010.12.031.  Google Scholar

[26]

Y. JinJ. Jost and G. Wang, A new nonlocal variational setting for image processing, Inverse Probl. Imaging, 9 (2015), 415-430.  doi: 10.3934/ipi.2015.9.415.  Google Scholar

[27]

Y. Kim and L. A. Vese, Image recovery using functions of bounded variation and Sobolev spaces of negative differentiability, Inverse Probl. Imaging, 3 (2009), 43-68.  doi: 10.3934/ipi.2009.3.43.  Google Scholar

[28]

S. KindermannS. Osher and P. W. Jones, Deblurring and denoising of images by nonlocal functionals, Multiscale Model. Simul., 4 (2005), 1091-1115.  doi: 10.1137/050622249.  Google Scholar

[29]

T. M. Le and L. A. Vese, Image decomposition using total variation and $ \rm{div} $($ \rm{BMO} $), Multiscale Model. Simul., 4 (2005), 390-423.  doi: 10.1137/040610052.  Google Scholar

[30]

L. H. Lieu and L. A. Vese, Image restoration and decomposition via bounded total variation and negative Hilbert-Sobolev spaces, Appl. Math. Optim., 58 (2008), 167-193.  doi: 10.1007/s00245-008-9047-8.  Google Scholar

[31]

X. Liu and L. Huang, A new nonlocal total variation regularization algorithm for image denoising, Math. Comput. Simulation, 97 (2014), 224-233.  doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2013.10.001.  Google Scholar

[32]

Y. Meyer, Oscillating Patterns in Image Processing and Nonlinear Evolution Equations, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, (2001). doi: 10.1090/ulect/022.  Google Scholar

[33]

K. S. Miller and B. Ross, An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Fractional Differential Equations, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, (1993).  Google Scholar

[34]

S. OsherA. Solé and L. Vese, Image decomposition and restoration using total variation minimization and the $H^{-1}$ norm, Multiscale Model. Simul., 1 (2003), 349-370.  doi: 10.1137/S1540345902416247.  Google Scholar

[35]

P. Perona and J. Malik, Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 12 (1990), 629-639.  doi: 10.1109/34.56205.  Google Scholar

[36]

L. I. RudinS. Osher and E. Fatemi, Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms, Phys. D., 60 (1992), 259-268.  doi: 10.1016/0167-2789(92)90242-F.  Google Scholar

[37]

L. N. Slobodeckiĭ, Generalized Sobolev spaces and their application to boundary problems for partial differential equations, Leningrad. Gos. Ped. Inst. Učen. Zap., 197 (1958), 54-112.   Google Scholar

[38]

N. N. Tarkhanov, The Analysis of Solutions of Elliptic Equations, Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, (1997). doi: 10.1007/978-94-015-8804-1.  Google Scholar

[39]

L. A. Vese and S. J. Osher, Modeling textures with total variation minimization and oscillating patterns in image processing, J. Sci. Comput., 19 (2003), 553-572.  doi: 10.1023/A:1025384832106.  Google Scholar

[40]

Z. WangA. C. BovikH. R. Sheikh and E. P. Simoncelli, Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13 (2004), 600-612.  doi: 10.1109/TIP.2003.819861.  Google Scholar

[41]

L. P. Yaroslavsky, Digital Picture Processing, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-81929-2.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

R. AboulaichD. Meskine and A. Souissi, New diffusion models in image processing, Comput. Math. Appl., 56 (2008), 874-882.  doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2008.01.017.  Google Scholar

[2] R. A. Adams, Sobolev Spaces, Ac. Press, New york, 1975.   Google Scholar
[3]

L. AfraitesA. AtlasF. Karami and D. Meskine, Some class of parabolic systems applied to image processing, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B, 21 (2016), 1671-1687.  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016017.  Google Scholar

[4]

L. AlvarezP.-L. Lions and J.-M. Morel, Image selective smoothing and edge detection by nonlinear diffusion. Ⅱ, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 29 (1992), 845-866.  doi: 10.1137/0729052.  Google Scholar

[5]

F. AndreuC. BallesterV. Caselles and J. M. Mazón, Minimizing total variation flow, Differential Integral Equations, 14 (2001), 321-360.   Google Scholar

[6]

N. Aronszajn, Boundary values of functions with finite Dirichlet integral, Techn. Report of Univ. of Kansas, 14 (1955), 77-94.   Google Scholar

[7]

G. Aubert and J.-F. Aujol, Modeling very oscillating signals. Application to image processing, Appl. Math. Optim., 51 (2005), 163-182.  doi: 10.1007/s00245-004-0812-z.  Google Scholar

[8]

J.-F. AujolG. AubertL. Blanc-Féraud and A. Chambolle, Image decomposition into a bounded variation component and an oscillating component, J. Math. Imaging Vision, 22 (2005), 71-88.  doi: 10.1007/s10851-005-4783-8.  Google Scholar

[9]

A. BuadesB. Coll and J. M. Morel, A non-local algorithm for image denoising, IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2 (2005), 60-65.   Google Scholar

[10]

A. Chambolle, R. A. DeVore, N.-Y. Lee and B. J. Lucier, Nonlinear wavelet image processing: Variational problems, compression, and noise removal through wavelet shrinkage, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 7 (1998), 319–335. doi: 10.1109/83.661182.  Google Scholar

[11]

E. A. Coddington and N. Levinson, Theory of ordinary differential equations, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York-Toronto-London, (1955).  Google Scholar

[12]

E. Di NezzaG. Palatucci and E. Valdinoci, Hitchhiker's guide to the fractional Sobolev spaces, Bull. Sci. Math., 136 (2012), 521-573.  doi: 10.1016/j.bulsci.2011.12.004.  Google Scholar

[13]

K. Diethelm, The Analysis of Fractional Differential Equations, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, (2010). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-14574-2.  Google Scholar

[14]

S. DipierroX. Ros-Oton and E. Valdinoci, Nonlocal problems with Neumann boundary conditions, Rev. Mat. Iberoam., 33 (2017), 377-416.  doi: 10.4171/RMI/942.  Google Scholar

[15]

D. L. Donoho, De-noising by soft-thresholding, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 41 (1995), 613-627.  doi: 10.1109/18.382009.  Google Scholar

[16]

A. Elmahi and D. Meskine, Parabolic equations in Orlicz spaces, J. London Math. Soc. (2), 72 (2005), 410-428.  doi: 10.1112/S0024610705006630.  Google Scholar

[17]

A. ElmoatazX. Desquesnes and O. Lézoray, Non-Local Morphological PDEs and $p$-Laplacian Equation on Graphs With Applications in Image Processing and Machine Learning, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 6 (2012), 764-779.  doi: 10.1109/JSTSP.2012.2216504.  Google Scholar

[18]

E. Gagliardo, Ulteriori proprietà di alcune classi di funzioni in più variabili, Ricerche Mat., 8 (1959), 24-51.   Google Scholar

[19]

J. B. GarnettP. W. JonesT. M. Le and L. A Vese, Modeling oscillatory components with the homogeneous spaces $B\dot MO^{-\alpha}$ and $\dot W{}^{-\alpha,p}$, Pure Appl. Math. Q., 7 (2011), 275-318.  doi: 10.4310/PAMQ.2011.v7.n2.a2.  Google Scholar

[20]

J. B. GarnettT. M. LeY. Meyer and L. A Vese, Image decompositions using bounded variation and generalized homogeneous Besov spaces, Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal., 23 (2007), 25-56.  doi: 10.1016/j.acha.2007.01.005.  Google Scholar

[21]

Y. GigaM. Muszkieta and P. Rybka, A duality based approach to the minimizing total variation flow in the space $H^{-s}$, Jpn. J. Ind. Appl. Math., 36 (2019), 261-286.  doi: 10.1007/s13160-018-00340-4.  Google Scholar

[22]

G. Gilboa and S. Osher, Nonlocal linear image regularization and supervised segmentation, Multiscale Model. Simul., 6 (2007), 595-630.  doi: 10.1137/060669358.  Google Scholar

[23]

G. Gilboa and S. Osher, Nonlocal operators with applications to image processing, Multiscale Model. Simul., 7 (2008), 1005-1028.  doi: 10.1137/070698592.  Google Scholar

[24]

J.-P. Gossez, Nonlinear elliptic boundary value problems for equations with rapidly (or slowly) increasing coefficients, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 190 (1974), 163-205.  doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-1974-0342854-2.  Google Scholar

[25]

Z. GuoJ. Yin and Q. Liu, On a reaction-diffusion system applied to image decomposition and restoration, Math. Comput. Modelling, 53 (2011), 1336-1350.  doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2010.12.031.  Google Scholar

[26]

Y. JinJ. Jost and G. Wang, A new nonlocal variational setting for image processing, Inverse Probl. Imaging, 9 (2015), 415-430.  doi: 10.3934/ipi.2015.9.415.  Google Scholar

[27]

Y. Kim and L. A. Vese, Image recovery using functions of bounded variation and Sobolev spaces of negative differentiability, Inverse Probl. Imaging, 3 (2009), 43-68.  doi: 10.3934/ipi.2009.3.43.  Google Scholar

[28]

S. KindermannS. Osher and P. W. Jones, Deblurring and denoising of images by nonlocal functionals, Multiscale Model. Simul., 4 (2005), 1091-1115.  doi: 10.1137/050622249.  Google Scholar

[29]

T. M. Le and L. A. Vese, Image decomposition using total variation and $ \rm{div} $($ \rm{BMO} $), Multiscale Model. Simul., 4 (2005), 390-423.  doi: 10.1137/040610052.  Google Scholar

[30]

L. H. Lieu and L. A. Vese, Image restoration and decomposition via bounded total variation and negative Hilbert-Sobolev spaces, Appl. Math. Optim., 58 (2008), 167-193.  doi: 10.1007/s00245-008-9047-8.  Google Scholar

[31]

X. Liu and L. Huang, A new nonlocal total variation regularization algorithm for image denoising, Math. Comput. Simulation, 97 (2014), 224-233.  doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2013.10.001.  Google Scholar

[32]

Y. Meyer, Oscillating Patterns in Image Processing and Nonlinear Evolution Equations, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, (2001). doi: 10.1090/ulect/022.  Google Scholar

[33]

K. S. Miller and B. Ross, An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Fractional Differential Equations, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, (1993).  Google Scholar

[34]

S. OsherA. Solé and L. Vese, Image decomposition and restoration using total variation minimization and the $H^{-1}$ norm, Multiscale Model. Simul., 1 (2003), 349-370.  doi: 10.1137/S1540345902416247.  Google Scholar

[35]

P. Perona and J. Malik, Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 12 (1990), 629-639.  doi: 10.1109/34.56205.  Google Scholar

[36]

L. I. RudinS. Osher and E. Fatemi, Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms, Phys. D., 60 (1992), 259-268.  doi: 10.1016/0167-2789(92)90242-F.  Google Scholar

[37]

L. N. Slobodeckiĭ, Generalized Sobolev spaces and their application to boundary problems for partial differential equations, Leningrad. Gos. Ped. Inst. Učen. Zap., 197 (1958), 54-112.   Google Scholar

[38]

N. N. Tarkhanov, The Analysis of Solutions of Elliptic Equations, Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, (1997). doi: 10.1007/978-94-015-8804-1.  Google Scholar

[39]

L. A. Vese and S. J. Osher, Modeling textures with total variation minimization and oscillating patterns in image processing, J. Sci. Comput., 19 (2003), 553-572.  doi: 10.1023/A:1025384832106.  Google Scholar

[40]

Z. WangA. C. BovikH. R. Sheikh and E. P. Simoncelli, Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13 (2004), 600-612.  doi: 10.1109/TIP.2003.819861.  Google Scholar

[41]

L. P. Yaroslavsky, Digital Picture Processing, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-81929-2.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  Comparison between the regularization terms of the function $ f(x) = 1/|x| $ associated to the TV operator, which is weak in the numerical simulations, (the lines associated to this function are illustrated by the red curves in both figures: case $ \epsilon = 0 $ and case $ \gamma = 0 $). The first figure illustrates the curves obtained by the function $ f(x) = 1/\sqrt{|x|^{2}+\epsilon} $ and by different values of $ \epsilon $. The second figure illustrates the curves obtained by $ f(x) = ( \mathop{{\rm{log}}}(1+|x|))^{\gamma}/|x| $ and by different values of $ \gamma $. It is clear that the previously proposed converges rapidly to the regularization term associated with the TV operator from $ \gamma = 10^{-1} $. On the other hand, the other function converges from $ \epsilon = 10^{-4} $
Figure 2.  Original images
Figure 3.  The efficiency test of our model to denoise corrupted images with $ \sigma = 10 $ (see Table 1)
Figure 4.  The efficiency test of our model to denoise corrupted images with $ \sigma = 20 $ (see Table 2)
Figure 5.  The efficiency test of our model to denoise corrupted images with $ \sigma = 30 $ (see Table 3)
Figure 6.  Image denoising performed on the medical image ('Lung' image). Noise removal results provided by our model and other denoising techniques
Figure 7.  Image denoising performed on the grayscale image ('Einstein' image). Noise removal results provided by our model and other denoising techniques
Figure 8.  Image denoising performed on the grayscale image ('Lena' image). Noise removal results provided by our model and other denoising techniques
Figure 10.  The comparison results of different values of the fraction $ s $ obtained by our proposed model. The first row contains smooth images $ u $; The second row contains a residual part associated with $ u-f $
Figure 9.  This figure shows the ability to reduce the staircase effect between restored images with our proposed model and the TV model using the $ L^{2}- $norm from [36]. Our model can successfully reduce the staircase phenomenon during the image denoising
Figure 11.  Comparisons results between the classical TV model ($ L^{2}- $norm) from [36] and the AAKM model ($ H^{-1}- $norm) from [3] with our proposed model ($ H^{-0.5}- $norm)
Figure 12.  Results on Scan's image of line profile number $ 50 $. Red: original image; Green: cartoon part obtained by the TV model using the $ L^{2}- $norm [36]; Violet: cartoon part obtained by the AAKM model using the $ H^{-1}- $norm [3]; Blue: cartoon part obtained by our proposed model using the $ H^{-0.5}- $norm
Figure 13.  Comparison results of edge detector, contour lines and texture applied on a cartoon image obtained by the classical TV model (using the $ L^{2}- $norm) from [36] and AAKM model (using the $ H^{-1}- $norm) from [3] with our proposed model (using the $ H^{-0.5}- $norm)
Figure 14.  Results on Pepper's image of line profile number $ 50 $. Red: original image; Green: cartoon part obtained by the TV model using the $ L^{2}- $norm from [36]; Violet: cartoon part obtained by the AAKM model using the $ H^{-1}- $norm from [3]; Blue: cartoon part obtained by our proposed model using the $ H^{-0.5}- $norm
Figure 15.  Comparison results of edge detector, contour lines and texture applied on a cartoon image obtained by the classical TV model (the $ L^{2}- $norm) from [36] and the AAKM model (the $ H^{-1}- $norm) from [3] with our proposed model (the $ H^{-0.5}- $norm)
Table 1.  The SNR and PSNR values of Noisy ($ \sigma=10 $) and Restored images of the first efficiency test
Noise level $\underline{Fig.3(A)}$ $\underline{Fig.3(D)}$ $\underline{Fig.3(B)}$ $\underline{Fig.3(E)}$ $\underline{Fig.3(C)}$ $\underline{Fig.3(F)}$
$ \sigma=10 $ $\mbox{Noisy}$ $\mbox{Restored}$ $\mbox{Noisy}$ $\mbox{Restored}$ $\mbox{Noisy}$ $\mbox{Restored}$
$\mbox{SNR}$ 12.54 20.23 13.57 14.84 12.66 15.11
$\mbox{PSNR}$ 28.14 35.82 27.22 29.16 28.17 30.60
$\mbox{SSIM}$ 0.782 0.971 0.865 0.933 0.590 0.949
Noise level $\underline{Fig.3(A)}$ $\underline{Fig.3(D)}$ $\underline{Fig.3(B)}$ $\underline{Fig.3(E)}$ $\underline{Fig.3(C)}$ $\underline{Fig.3(F)}$
$ \sigma=10 $ $\mbox{Noisy}$ $\mbox{Restored}$ $\mbox{Noisy}$ $\mbox{Restored}$ $\mbox{Noisy}$ $\mbox{Restored}$
$\mbox{SNR}$ 12.54 20.23 13.57 14.84 12.66 15.11
$\mbox{PSNR}$ 28.14 35.82 27.22 29.16 28.17 30.60
$\mbox{SSIM}$ 0.782 0.971 0.865 0.933 0.590 0.949
Table 2.  The $\mbox{SNR}$ and $\mbox{PSNR}$ values of Noisy ($ \sigma=20 $) and Restored images of the second efficiency test
$\mbox{Noise level}$ $\underline{Fig.4(A)}$ $\underline{Fig.4(D)}$ $\underline{Fig.4(B)}$ $\underline{Fig.4(E)}$ $\underline{Fig.4(C)}$ $\underline{Fig.4(F)}$
$ \sigma=20 $ $\mbox{Noisy}$ $\mbox{Restored}$ $\mbox{Noisy}$ $\mbox{Restored}$ $\mbox{Noisy}$ $\mbox{Restored}$
$\mbox{SNR}$ 06.50 17.49 09.04 12.10 06.62 13.41
$\mbox{PSNR}$ 22.10 33.09 22.02 25.38 22.13 28.90
$\mbox{SSIM}$ 0.580 0.925 0.743 0.896 0.422 0.837
$\mbox{Noise level}$ $\underline{Fig.4(A)}$ $\underline{Fig.4(D)}$ $\underline{Fig.4(B)}$ $\underline{Fig.4(E)}$ $\underline{Fig.4(C)}$ $\underline{Fig.4(F)}$
$ \sigma=20 $ $\mbox{Noisy}$ $\mbox{Restored}$ $\mbox{Noisy}$ $\mbox{Restored}$ $\mbox{Noisy}$ $\mbox{Restored}$
$\mbox{SNR}$ 06.50 17.49 09.04 12.10 06.62 13.41
$\mbox{PSNR}$ 22.10 33.09 22.02 25.38 22.13 28.90
$\mbox{SSIM}$ 0.580 0.925 0.743 0.896 0.422 0.837
Table 3.  The $\mbox{SNR}$ and $\mbox{PSNR}$ values of Noisy ($ \sigma=30 $) and Restored images of the third efficiency test
$\mbox{Noise level}$ $\underline{Fig.5(A)}$ $\underline{Fig.5(D)}$ $\underline{Fig.5(B)}$ $\underline{Fig.5(E)}$ $\underline{Fig.5(C)}$ $\underline{Fig.5(F)}$
$ \sigma=30$ $\mbox{Noisy}$ $\mbox{Restored}$ $\mbox{Noisy}$ $\mbox{Restored}$ $\mbox{Noisy}$ $\mbox{Restored}$
$\mbox{SNR}$ 03.01 16.12 05.51 10.07 03.06 12.44
$\mbox{PSNR}$ 18.58 31.73 18.56 23.39 18.54 27.92
$\mbox{SSIM}$ 0.501 0.884 0.650 0.885 0.325 0.780
$\mbox{Noise level}$ $\underline{Fig.5(A)}$ $\underline{Fig.5(D)}$ $\underline{Fig.5(B)}$ $\underline{Fig.5(E)}$ $\underline{Fig.5(C)}$ $\underline{Fig.5(F)}$
$ \sigma=30$ $\mbox{Noisy}$ $\mbox{Restored}$ $\mbox{Noisy}$ $\mbox{Restored}$ $\mbox{Noisy}$ $\mbox{Restored}$
$\mbox{SNR}$ 03.01 16.12 05.51 10.07 03.06 12.44
$\mbox{PSNR}$ 18.58 31.73 18.56 23.39 18.54 27.92
$\mbox{SSIM}$ 0.501 0.884 0.650 0.885 0.325 0.780
[1]

Xiaomao Deng, Xiao-Chuan Cai, Jun Zou. A parallel space-time domain decomposition method for unsteady source inversion problems. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2015, 9 (4) : 1069-1091. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2015.9.1069

[2]

Tao Wu, Yu Lei, Jiao Shi, Maoguo Gong. An evolutionary multiobjective method for low-rank and sparse matrix decomposition. Big Data & Information Analytics, 2017, 2 (1) : 23-37. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2017006

[3]

Lunji Song, Wenya Qi, Kaifang Liu, Qingxian Gu. A new over-penalized weak galerkin finite element method. Part Ⅱ: Elliptic interface problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (5) : 2581-2598. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020196

[4]

Kaifang Liu, Lunji Song, Shan Zhao. A new over-penalized weak galerkin method. Part Ⅰ: Second-order elliptic problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (5) : 2411-2428. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020184

[5]

Deren Han, Zehui Jia, Yongzhong Song, David Z. W. Wang. An efficient projection method for nonlinear inverse problems with sparsity constraints. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2016, 10 (3) : 689-709. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2016017

[6]

Jiangxing Wang. Convergence analysis of an accurate and efficient method for nonlinear Maxwell's equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (5) : 2429-2440. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020185

[7]

Lekbir Afraites, Abdelghafour Atlas, Fahd Karami, Driss Meskine. Some class of parabolic systems applied to image processing. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (6) : 1671-1687. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016017

[8]

Simone Cacace, Maurizio Falcone. A dynamic domain decomposition for the eikonal-diffusion equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2016, 9 (1) : 109-123. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016.9.109

[9]

Zhihua Zhang, Naoki Saito. PHLST with adaptive tiling and its application to antarctic remote sensing image approximation. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2014, 8 (1) : 321-337. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2014.8.321

[10]

Israa Mohammed Khudher, Yahya Ismail Ibrahim, Suhaib Abduljabbar Altamir. Individual biometrics pattern based artificial image analysis techniques. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/naco.2020056

[11]

Armin Lechleiter, Tobias Rienmüller. Factorization method for the inverse Stokes problem. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2013, 7 (4) : 1271-1293. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2013.7.1271

[12]

Jia Cai, Guanglong Xu, Zhensheng Hu. Sketch-based image retrieval via CAT loss with elastic net regularization. Mathematical Foundations of Computing, 2020, 3 (4) : 219-227. doi: 10.3934/mfc.2020013

[13]

Qiang Guo, Dong Liang. An adaptive wavelet method and its analysis for parabolic equations. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2013, 3 (2) : 327-345. doi: 10.3934/naco.2013.3.327

[14]

Ritu Agarwal, Kritika, Sunil Dutt Purohit, Devendra Kumar. Mathematical modelling of cytosolic calcium concentration distribution using non-local fractional operator. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2021017

[15]

Saima Rashid, Fahd Jarad, Zakia Hammouch. Some new bounds analogous to generalized proportional fractional integral operator with respect to another function. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2021020

[16]

Amit Goswami, Sushila Rathore, Jagdev Singh, Devendra Kumar. Analytical study of fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equation with harmonic oscillator. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2021021

[17]

Boris Kramer, John R. Singler. A POD projection method for large-scale algebraic Riccati equations. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2016, 6 (4) : 413-435. doi: 10.3934/naco.2016018

[18]

Petra Csomós, Hermann Mena. Fourier-splitting method for solving hyperbolic LQR problems. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2018, 8 (1) : 17-46. doi: 10.3934/naco.2018002

[19]

Christina Surulescu, Nicolae Surulescu. Modeling and simulation of some cell dispersion problems by a nonparametric method. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2011, 8 (2) : 263-277. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.263

[20]

Min Li. A three term Polak-Ribière-Polyak conjugate gradient method close to the memoryless BFGS quasi-Newton method. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020, 16 (1) : 245-260. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018149

2019 Impact Factor: 1.27

Article outline

Figures and Tables

[Back to Top]