American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
October  2021, 26(10): 5337-5354. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020346

Qualitative analysis of a generalized Nosé-Hoover oscillator

Qianqian Han 1, and  Xiao-Song Yang 2,3,,

1. 

School of Mathematics and Statistics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, Henan 450046, China
2. 

School of Mathematics and Statistics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China
3. 

Hubei Key Laboratory of Engineering Modeling and Science Computing, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China

* Corresponding author: Xiao-Song Yang

Received  November 2019 Revised  July 2020 Published  October 2021 Early access  November 2020

Fund Project: The first author is supported by NSFC grant 51979116

In this paper, we analyze the qualitative dynamics of a generalized Nosé-Hoover oscillator with two parameters varying in certain scope. We show that if a solution of this oscillator will not tend to the invariant manifold $ \{(x,y,z)\in \mathbb R^3|x = 0,y = 0\} $, it must pass through the plane $ z = 0 $ infinite times. Especially, every invariant set of this oscillator must have intersection with the plane $ z = 0 $. In addition, we show that if a solution is quasiperiodic, it must pass through at least five quadrants of $ \mathbb R^3 $.

Keywords: Quasiperiodic orbit, qualitative dynamic, generalized Nosé-Hoover oscillator, invariant set, nonlinear ordinary differential equation.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 34C15, 34C27; Secondary: 37C55.
Citation: Qianqian Han, Xiao-Song Yang. Qualitative analysis of a generalized Nosé-Hoover oscillator. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (10) : 5337-5354. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020346
References:
[1]

Q. Han and X.-S. Yang, Qualitative analysis of the Nosé-Hoover oscillator, Qual. Theory Dyn. Syst., 19 (2020), 1-36.  doi: 10.1007/s12346-020-00340-1.  Google Scholar

[2]

W. G. Hoover, Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions, Phys. Rev. A, 31 (1985), 1695-1697.  doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695.  Google Scholar

[3]

S. Nosé, A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods, Journal of Chemical Physics, 81 (1984), 511-519.   Google Scholar

[4]

S. Nosé, A molecular dynamics method for simulations in the canonical ensemble, Molecular Physics, 52 (2002), 255-268.   Google Scholar

[5]

H. A. Posch, W. G. Hoover and F. J. Vesely, Canonical dynamics of the nosé oscillator: Stability, order, and chaos, Phys. Rev. A, 33 (1986), 4253-4265.  doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.33.4253.  Google Scholar

[6]

P. C. Rech, Quasiperiodicity and chaos in a generalized Nosé-Hoover oscillator, Internat. J. Bifur. Chaos Appl. Sci. Engrg., 26 (2016), 1650170, 7 pp. doi: 10.1142/S0218127416501704.  Google Scholar

[7]

J. C. Sprott, W. G. Hoover and C. G. Hoover, Heat conduction, and the lack thereof, in time-reversible dynamical systems: Generalized nosé-hoover oscillators with a temperature gradient, Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys., 89 (2014), 042914-042914.  doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.89.042914.  Google Scholar

[8]

L. Wang and X.-S. Yang, The invariant tori of knot type and the interlinked invariant tori in the nosé-hoover oscillator, European Physical Journal B, 88 (2015), 1-5.  doi: 10.1140/epjb/e2015-60062-1.  Google Scholar

[9]

L. Wang and X.-S. Yang, A vast amount of various invariant tori in the Nosé-Hoover oscillator, Chaos, 25 (2015), 123110, 6 pp. doi: 10.1063/1.4937167.  Google Scholar

[10]

L. Wang and X.-S. Yang, The coexistence of invariant tori and topological horseshoe in a generalized Nosé-Hoover oscillator, Internat. J. Bifur. Chaos Appl. Sci. Engrg., 27 (2017), 1750111, 12 pp. doi: 10.1142/S0218127417501115.  Google Scholar

[11]

L. Wang and X.-S. Yang, Global analysis of a generalized Nosé-Hoover oscillator, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 464 (2018), 370-379.  doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2018.04.013.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

Q. Han and X.-S. Yang, Qualitative analysis of the Nosé-Hoover oscillator, Qual. Theory Dyn. Syst., 19 (2020), 1-36.  doi: 10.1007/s12346-020-00340-1.  Google Scholar

[2]

W. G. Hoover, Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions, Phys. Rev. A, 31 (1985), 1695-1697.  doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695.  Google Scholar

[3]

S. Nosé, A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods, Journal of Chemical Physics, 81 (1984), 511-519.   Google Scholar

[4]

S. Nosé, A molecular dynamics method for simulations in the canonical ensemble, Molecular Physics, 52 (2002), 255-268.   Google Scholar

[5]

H. A. Posch, W. G. Hoover and F. J. Vesely, Canonical dynamics of the nosé oscillator: Stability, order, and chaos, Phys. Rev. A, 33 (1986), 4253-4265.  doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.33.4253.  Google Scholar

[6]

P. C. Rech, Quasiperiodicity and chaos in a generalized Nosé-Hoover oscillator, Internat. J. Bifur. Chaos Appl. Sci. Engrg., 26 (2016), 1650170, 7 pp. doi: 10.1142/S0218127416501704.  Google Scholar

[7]

J. C. Sprott, W. G. Hoover and C. G. Hoover, Heat conduction, and the lack thereof, in time-reversible dynamical systems: Generalized nosé-hoover oscillators with a temperature gradient, Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys., 89 (2014), 042914-042914.  doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.89.042914.  Google Scholar

[8]

L. Wang and X.-S. Yang, The invariant tori of knot type and the interlinked invariant tori in the nosé-hoover oscillator, European Physical Journal B, 88 (2015), 1-5.  doi: 10.1140/epjb/e2015-60062-1.  Google Scholar

[9]

L. Wang and X.-S. Yang, A vast amount of various invariant tori in the Nosé-Hoover oscillator, Chaos, 25 (2015), 123110, 6 pp. doi: 10.1063/1.4937167.  Google Scholar

[10]

L. Wang and X.-S. Yang, The coexistence of invariant tori and topological horseshoe in a generalized Nosé-Hoover oscillator, Internat. J. Bifur. Chaos Appl. Sci. Engrg., 27 (2017), 1750111, 12 pp. doi: 10.1142/S0218127417501115.  Google Scholar

[11]

L. Wang and X.-S. Yang, Global analysis of a generalized Nosé-Hoover oscillator, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 464 (2018), 370-379.  doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2018.04.013.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  The grid is part of $ S_{1} $ and the shadow is part of $ S_{2} $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2.  The shadow is the projection of the region $ I $ on the plane $ z = 0 $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3.  $ A_{1}\rightarrow A_{2} $ means there are solutions from $ A_{1} $ to $ A_{2} $, $ B_{1}\dashrightarrow A_{2} $ means there are solutions from $ B_{1} $ to $ A_{2} $ and these solutions have intersection with $ X $-axis or $ Y $-axis
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4.  From right to left are $ l_{10} $ and $ l_{20} $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 5.  From right to left are $ l_{01} $, $ l_{02} $, $ l_{03} $ and $ l_{04} $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

[1]

Alain Léger, Elaine Pratt. On the equilibria and qualitative dynamics of a forced nonlinear oscillator with contact and friction. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2016, 9 (2) : 501-527. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016009
[2]

Jorge A. Esquivel-Avila. Qualitative analysis of a nonlinear wave equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2004, 10 (3) : 787-804. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2004.10.787
[3]

W. Sarlet, G. E. Prince, M. Crampin. Generalized submersiveness of second-order ordinary differential equations. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2009, 1 (2) : 209-221. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2009.1.209
[4]

Aeeman Fatima, F. M. Mahomed, Chaudry Masood Khalique. Conditional symmetries of nonlinear third-order ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 11 (4) : 655-666. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2018040
[5]

Alessandro Fonda, Fabio Zanolin. Bounded solutions of nonlinear second order ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1998, 4 (1) : 91-98. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1998.4.91
[6]

Amit Goswami, Sushila Rathore, Jagdev Singh, Devendra Kumar. Analytical study of fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equation with harmonic oscillator. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (10) : 3589-3610. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2021021
[7]

Daniel G. Alfaro Vigo, Amaury C. Álvarez, Grigori Chapiro, Galina C. García, Carlos G. Moreira. Solving the inverse problem for an ordinary differential equation using conjugation. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2020, 7 (2) : 183-208. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2020008
[8]

Richard A. Norton, G. R. W. Quispel. Discrete gradient methods for preserving a first integral of an ordinary differential equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2014, 34 (3) : 1147-1170. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.1147
[9]

Tomás Caraballo, Renato Colucci, Luca Guerrini. Bifurcation scenarios in an ordinary differential equation with constant and distributed delay: A case study. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (6) : 2639-2655. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018268
[10]

Lukáš Adam, Jiří Outrata. On optimal control of a sweeping process coupled with an ordinary differential equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2014, 19 (9) : 2709-2738. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.2709
[11]

Zhongkai Guo. Invariant foliations for stochastic partial differential equations with dynamic boundary conditions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2015, 35 (11) : 5203-5219. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.5203
[12]

Kiah Wah Ong. Dynamic transitions of generalized Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (4) : 1225-1236. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016.21.1225
[13]

Jordi-Lluís Figueras, Àlex Haro. A note on the fractalization of saddle invariant curves in quasiperiodic systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2016, 9 (4) : 1095-1107. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016043
[14]

L. Bakker. A reducible representation of the generalized symmetry group of a quasiperiodic flow. Conference Publications, 2003, 2003 (Special) : 68-77. doi: 10.3934/proc.2003.2003.68
[15]

Pavel I. Naumkin, Isahi Sánchez-Suárez. On the critical nongauge invariant nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2011, 30 (3) : 807-834. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.30.807
[16]

Lijun Yi, Zhongqing Wang. Legendre spectral collocation method for second-order nonlinear ordinary/partial differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2014, 19 (1) : 299-322. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.299
[17]

Yanfei Lu, Qingfei Yin, Hongyi Li, Hongli Sun, Yunlei Yang, Muzhou Hou. Solving higher order nonlinear ordinary differential equations with least squares support vector machines. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020, 16 (3) : 1481-1502. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019012
[18]

Lijuan Wang, Yashan Xu. Admissible controls and controllable sets for a linear time-varying ordinary differential equation. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2018, 8 (3&4) : 1001-1019. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2018043
[19]

Yuriy Golovaty, Anna Marciniak-Czochra, Mariya Ptashnyk. Stability of nonconstant stationary solutions in a reaction-diffusion equation coupled to the system of ordinary differential equations. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2012, 11 (1) : 229-241. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2012.11.229
[20]

Qiong Meng, X. H. Tang. Multiple solutions of second-order ordinary differential equation via Morse theory. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2012, 11 (3) : 945-958. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2012.11.945

2020 Impact Factor: 1.327

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (83)
  • HTML views (313)
  • Cited by (0)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2021 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences