# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

• Previous Article
Design of new scheme adaptive generalized hybrid projective synchronization for two different chaotic systems with uncertain parameters
• DCDS-B Home
• This Issue
• Next Article
Existence and stability of generalized transition waves for time-dependent reaction-diffusion systems

## Optimal control strategies for an online game addiction model with low and high risk exposure

 School of Science, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, Guangxi 541004, China

* Corresponding author: Tingting Li

Received  May 2020 Revised  August 2020 Published  November 2020

Fund Project: The second author is supported by the Basic Competence Promotion Project for Young and Middle-aged Teachers in Guangxi, China (2019KY0269)

In this paper, we establish a new online game addiction model with low and high risk exposure. With the help of the next generation matrix, the basic reproduction number $R_{0}$ is obtained. By constructing a suitable Lyapunov function, the equilibria of the model are Globally Asymptotically Stable. We use the optimal control theory to study the optimal solution problem with three kinds of control measures (isolation, education and treatment) and get the expression of optimal control. In the simulation, we first verify the Globally Asymptotical Stability of Disease-Free Equilibrium and Endemic Equilibrium, and obtain that the different trajectories with different initial values converges to the equilibria. Then the simulations of nine control strategies are obtained by forward-backward sweep method, and they are compared with the situation of without control respectively. The results show that we should implement the three kinds of control measures according to the optimal control strategy at the same time, which can effectively reduce the situation of game addiction.

Citation: Youming Guo, Tingting Li. Optimal control strategies for an online game addiction model with low and high risk exposure. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020347
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
Transfer diagram of model
DFE $D_{0} = (829,0,0,0,0,0)$ is Globally Asymptotically Stable when $R_{0} = 0.5778 < 1$ and $\beta = 0.2$
EE $D^{*} = (358.829, 20.903, 31.354, 67.916, 25.648,324.35)$ is Globally Asymptotically Stable when $R_{0} = 2.3111 > 1$ and $\beta = 0.8$
Dynamical behavior of infected when $R_{0} = 0.5778$ and $\beta = 0.2$
Dynamical behavior of infected when $R_{0} = 2.3111$ and $\beta = 0.8$
Graphical results for strategy A
Graphical results for strategy B
Graphical results for strategy C
Graphical results for strategy D
Graphical results for strategy E
Graphical results for strategy F
Graphical results for strategy G
Graphical results for strategy H
Graphical results for strategy I
Estimation of parameters
 Parameters Descriptions Values $\mu$ Natural supplementary and death rate 0.05 per week $\theta$ Proportion of individuals who became low risk exposed 0.4 per week $\beta$ Contact transmission rate 0.1$\sim$ 0.8 per week $v_{1}$ Proportion of $E_{1}$ who become infected 0.2 per week $v_{2}$ Proportion of $E_{1}$ who become professional 0.2 per week $w_{1}$ Proportion of $E_{2}$ who become infected 0.3 per week $w_{2}$ Proportion of $E_{1}$ who become professional 0.1 per week $k_{1}$ Proportion of $I$ who become quitting 0.05 per week $k_{2}$ Proportion of $I$ who become professional 0.1 per week $\delta$ Proportion of $P$ who become quitting 0.5 per week $u_{1}$ The decreased proportion by isolation Variable $u_{2}$ The decreased proportion in $E_{1}$ by prevention Variable $u_{3}$ The decreased proportion in $E_{2}$ by prevention Variable $u_{4}$ The decreased proportion in $I$ by treatment Variable
 Parameters Descriptions Values $\mu$ Natural supplementary and death rate 0.05 per week $\theta$ Proportion of individuals who became low risk exposed 0.4 per week $\beta$ Contact transmission rate 0.1$\sim$ 0.8 per week $v_{1}$ Proportion of $E_{1}$ who become infected 0.2 per week $v_{2}$ Proportion of $E_{1}$ who become professional 0.2 per week $w_{1}$ Proportion of $E_{2}$ who become infected 0.3 per week $w_{2}$ Proportion of $E_{1}$ who become professional 0.1 per week $k_{1}$ Proportion of $I$ who become quitting 0.05 per week $k_{2}$ Proportion of $I$ who become professional 0.1 per week $\delta$ Proportion of $P$ who become quitting 0.5 per week $u_{1}$ The decreased proportion by isolation Variable $u_{2}$ The decreased proportion in $E_{1}$ by prevention Variable $u_{3}$ The decreased proportion in $E_{2}$ by prevention Variable $u_{4}$ The decreased proportion in $I$ by treatment Variable
Results of different control strategies
 Strategy Total infectious individuals ($\int_{0}^{t_f}(E_{1}+E_{2}+I)dt)$ Averted infectious individuals Objective function $J$ Without control 7461.1302 $-$ $8.5947\times 10^{6}$ Strategy A 526.3468 6934.7835 $1.3646\times 10^{6}$ Strategy B 1426.9073 6034.2229 $2.5242\times 10^{6}$ Strategy C 701.3874 6759.7428 $1.7413\times 10^{6}$ Strategy D 524.2143 6936.9159 $1.3592\times 10^{6}$ Strategy E 525.4126 6935.7176 $1.3619\times 10^{6}$ Strategy F 525.0718 6936.0585 $1.3618\times 10^{6}$ Strategy G 579.8124 6881.3178 $4.784\times 10^{6}$ Strategy H 1626.7971 5834.3331 $2.7511\times 10^{6}$ Strategy I 658.0017 6803.1286 $2.6232\times 10^{6}$
 Strategy Total infectious individuals ($\int_{0}^{t_f}(E_{1}+E_{2}+I)dt)$ Averted infectious individuals Objective function $J$ Without control 7461.1302 $-$ $8.5947\times 10^{6}$ Strategy A 526.3468 6934.7835 $1.3646\times 10^{6}$ Strategy B 1426.9073 6034.2229 $2.5242\times 10^{6}$ Strategy C 701.3874 6759.7428 $1.7413\times 10^{6}$ Strategy D 524.2143 6936.9159 $1.3592\times 10^{6}$ Strategy E 525.4126 6935.7176 $1.3619\times 10^{6}$ Strategy F 525.0718 6936.0585 $1.3618\times 10^{6}$ Strategy G 579.8124 6881.3178 $4.784\times 10^{6}$ Strategy H 1626.7971 5834.3331 $2.7511\times 10^{6}$ Strategy I 658.0017 6803.1286 $2.6232\times 10^{6}$
 [1] Hong Niu, Zhijiang Feng, Qijin Xiao, Yajun Zhang. A PID control method based on optimal control strategy. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (1) : 117-126. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020019 [2] Yueyang Zheng, Jingtao Shi. A stackelberg game of backward stochastic differential equations with partial information. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2020  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020047 [3] Bernard Bonnard, Jérémy Rouot. Geometric optimal techniques to control the muscular force response to functional electrical stimulation using a non-isometric force-fatigue model. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jgm.2020032 [4] Zuliang Lu, Fei Huang, Xiankui Wu, Lin Li, Shang Liu. Convergence and quasi-optimality of $L^2-$norms based an adaptive finite element method for nonlinear optimal control problems. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (4) : 1459-1486. doi: 10.3934/era.2020077 [5] Lars Grüne, Matthias A. Müller, Christopher M. Kellett, Steven R. Weller. Strict dissipativity for discrete time discounted optimal control problems. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2020  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020046 [6] Stefano Bianchini, Paolo Bonicatto. Forward untangling and applications to the uniqueness problem for the continuity equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020384 [7] Yifan Chen, Thomas Y. Hou. Function approximation via the subsampled Poincaré inequality. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (1) : 169-199. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020296 [8] Juan Pablo Pinasco, Mauro Rodriguez Cartabia, Nicolas Saintier. Evolutionary game theory in mixed strategies: From microscopic interactions to kinetic equations. Kinetic & Related Models, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/krm.2020051 [9] José Madrid, João P. G. Ramos. On optimal autocorrelation inequalities on the real line. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020271 [10] Bahaaeldin Abdalla, Thabet Abdeljawad. Oscillation criteria for kernel function dependent fractional dynamic equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020443 [11] Mehdi Bastani, Davod Khojasteh Salkuyeh. On the GSOR iteration method for image restoration. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (1) : 27-43. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020013 [12] Hui Lv, Xing'an Wang. Dissipative control for uncertain singular markovian jump systems via hybrid impulsive control. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (1) : 127-142. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020020 [13] Tommi Brander, Joonas Ilmavirta, Petteri Piiroinen, Teemu Tyni. Optimal recovery of a radiating source with multiple frequencies along one line. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2020, 14 (6) : 967-983. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020044 [14] Lingfeng Li, Shousheng Luo, Xue-Cheng Tai, Jiang Yang. A new variational approach based on level-set function for convex hull problem with outliers. Inverse Problems & Imaging, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020070 [15] Mohammed Abdulrazaq Kahya, Suhaib Abduljabbar Altamir, Zakariya Yahya Algamal. Improving whale optimization algorithm for feature selection with a time-varying transfer function. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (1) : 87-98. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020017 [16] Awais Younus, Zoubia Dastgeer, Nudrat Ishaq, Abdul Ghaffar, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Devendra Kumar. On the observability of conformable linear time-invariant control systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020444 [17] Li-Bin Liu, Ying Liang, Jian Zhang, Xiaobing Bao. A robust adaptive grid method for singularly perturbed Burger-Huxley equations. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (4) : 1439-1457. doi: 10.3934/era.2020076 [18] Zexuan Liu, Zhiyuan Sun, Jerry Zhijian Yang. A numerical study of superconvergence of the discontinuous Galerkin method by patch reconstruction. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (4) : 1487-1501. doi: 10.3934/era.2020078 [19] Yuxia Guo, Shaolong Peng. A direct method of moving planes for fully nonlinear nonlocal operators and applications. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020462 [20] Noah Stevenson, Ian Tice. A truncated real interpolation method and characterizations of screened Sobolev spaces. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (12) : 5509-5566. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020250

2019 Impact Factor: 1.27