• Previous Article
    Concentration phenomenon of the endemic equilibrium of a reaction-diffusion-advection SIS epidemic model with spontaneous infection
  • DCDS-B Home
  • This Issue
  • Next Article
    Null controllability for a class of stochastic singular parabolic equations with the convection term
doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021297
Online First

Online First articles are published articles within a journal that have not yet been assigned to a formal issue. This means they do not yet have a volume number, issue number, or page numbers assigned to them, however, they can still be found and cited using their DOI (Digital Object Identifier). Online First publication benefits the research community by making new scientific discoveries known as quickly as possible.

Readers can access Online First articles via the “Online First” tab for the selected journal.

Orbital dynamics on invariant sets of contact Hamiltonian systems

1. 

School of Mathematics and Computing Science, Guangxi Colleges and Universities Key Laboratory of Data Analysis and Computation, Guilin 541002, China

2. 

Departamento de Matemática Aplicada, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, Granada 18071, Spain

*Corresponding author: Pedro J. Torres

Received  June 2021 Revised  October 2021 Early access December 2021

Fund Project: The first author is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11771105), Guangxi Natural Science Foundation (Grants No. 2017GXNSFFA198012 and 2018GXNSFAA138177)

In this paper, we shall give new insights on dynamics of contact Hamiltonian flows, which are gaining importance in several branches of physics as they model a dissipative behaviour. We divide the contact phase space into three parts, which are corresponding to three differential invariant sets $ \Omega_\pm, \Omega_0 $. On the invariant sets $ \Omega_\pm $, under some geometric conditions, the contact Hamiltonian system is equivalent to a Hamiltonian system via the Hölder transformation. The invariant set $ \Omega_0 $ may be composed of several equilibrium points and heteroclinic orbits connecting them, on which contact Hamiltonian system is conservative. Moreover, we have shown that, under general conditions, the zero energy level domain is a domain of attraction. In some cases, such a domain of attraction does not have nontrivial periodic orbits. Some interesting examples are presented.

Citation: Qihuai Liu, Pedro J. Torres. Orbital dynamics on invariant sets of contact Hamiltonian systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021297
References:
[1] V. I. Arnold, Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989.  doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-2063-1.  Google Scholar
[2]

A. Ashtekar, Introduction to loop quantum gravity and cosmology, Quantum Gravity and Quantum Cosmology, (eds. G. Calcagni, L. Papantonopoulos, G. Siopsis and N. Tsamis), Lecture Notes in Physics, Berlin, Heidelberg, 863 (2013). Google Scholar

[3]

C. P. Boyer, Completely integrable contact Hamiltonian systems and toric contact ctructures on $\mathbb{S}^2\times \mathbb{S}^3$, SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom. Methods Appl., 7 (2011), 1-22.  doi: 10.3842/SIGMA.2011.058.  Google Scholar

[4]

A. Bravetti, Contact Hamiltonian dynamics: The concept and its use, Entropy, 19 (2017), 535.  doi: 10.3390/e19100535.  Google Scholar

[5]

A. BravettiH. Cruz and D. Tapias, Contact Hamiltonian mechanics, Annals Physics, 376 (2017), 17-39.  doi: 10.1016/j.aop.2016.11.003.  Google Scholar

[6]

A. BravettiM. de LeónJ. C. Marrero and E. Padrón, Invariant measures for contact Hamiltonian systems: Symplectic sandwiches with contact bread, J. Phys. A, 53 (2020), 455205.  doi: 10.1088/1751-8121/abbaaa.  Google Scholar

[7]

A. Bravetti, M. Seri and F. Zadra, New directions for contact integrators, Geometric Science of Information, (eds. F. Nielsen and F. Barbaresco), Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences, Springer, 2021. Google Scholar

[8]

A. Bravetti and D. Tapias, Thermostat algorithm for generating target ensembles, Phys. Rev. E, 93 (2016), 022139.  doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.93.022139.  Google Scholar

[9]

P. Cannarsa, W. Cheng, K. Wang and J. Yan, Herglotz' generalized variational principle and contact type Hamilton-Jacobi equations, Trends in Control Theory and Partial Differential Equations, (eds. F. Alabau-Boussouira, F. Ancona, A. Porretta and C. Sinestrari), Springer INdAM Series, 32 (2019), 39–67.  Google Scholar

[10]

Y. ChenQ. Liu and H. Su, Generalized Hamiltonian forms of dissipative mechanical systems via a unified approach, J. Geom. Phys., 160 (2021), 103976.  doi: 10.1016/j.geomphys.2020.103976.  Google Scholar

[11]

F. CiagliaH. Cruz and G. Marmo, Contact manifolds and dissipation, classical and quantum, Ann. Physics, 398 (2018), 159-179.  doi: 10.1016/j.aop.2018.09.012.  Google Scholar

[12]

A. DaviniA. FathiR. Iturriaga and M. Zavidovique, Convergence of the solutions of the discounted Hamilton-Jacobi equation, Invent. Math., 206 (2016), 29-55.  doi: 10.1007/s00222-016-0648-6.  Google Scholar

[13]

M. de León and M. Lainz Valcázar, Contact hamiltonian systems, J. Math. Phys., 60 (2019), 102902.  doi: 10.1063/1.5096475.  Google Scholar

[14]

M. de León and M. Lainz Valcázar, Infinitesimal symmetries in contact Hamiltonian systems, J. Geom. Phys., 153 (2020), 103651.  doi: 10.1016/j.geomphys.2020.103651.  Google Scholar

[15]

M. de LeónM. Lainz and A. Muñiz-Brea, The Hamilton–Jacobi theory for contact Hamiltonian systems, Mathematics, 9 (2021), 1993.   Google Scholar

[16]

J. GasetX. GràciaM. C. Muñoz-LecandaX. Rivas and N. Rom án-Roy, New contributions to the Hamiltonian and Lagrangian contact formalisms for dissipative mechanical systems and their symmetries, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys., 17 (2020), 2050090.  doi: 10.1142/S0219887820500905.  Google Scholar

[17] M. Giaquinta and S. Hildebrandt, Calculus of Variations I, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996.   Google Scholar
[18]

S. Grillo and E. Padrón, Extended Hamilton–Jacobi theory, contact manifolds, and integrability by quadratures, J. Math. Phys., 61 (2020), 012901.  doi: 10.1063/1.5133153.  Google Scholar

[19]

M. Grmela and H. C. Őttinger, Dynamics and thermodynamics of complex fluids. I. Development of a general formalism, Phys. Rev. E, 56 (1997), 6620-6632.  doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.56.6620.  Google Scholar

[20]

S. Gryb and D. Sloan, When scale is surplus, Synthese, (2021).  doi: 10.1007/s11229-021-03443-7.  Google Scholar

[21]

S. Gryb and D. Sloan, New action for cosmology, Phys. Rev. D, 103 (2021), 043524.  doi: 10.1103/physrevd.103.043524.  Google Scholar

[22]

J. HongW. ChengS. Hu and K. Zhao, Representation formulas for contact type Hamilton-Jacobi equations, J. Dyn. Diff. Equat., (2021).  doi: 10.1007/s10884-021-09960-w.  Google Scholar

[23]

R. Huang, A qd-type method for computing generalized singular values of BF matrix pairs with sign regularity to high relative accuracy, Math. Comp., 89 (2020), 229-252.  doi: 10.1090/mcom/3444.  Google Scholar

[24]

A. L. Kholodenko, Applications of Contact Geometry and Topology in Physics, World Scientific, Singapore, 2013. doi: 10.1142/8514.  Google Scholar

[25]

Q. LiuX. Li and D. Qian, An abstract theorem on the existence of periodic motions of non-autonomous Lagrange systems, J. Differential Equations, 261 (2016), 5784-5802.  doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2016.08.010.  Google Scholar

[26]

Q. LiuP. J. Torres and W. Chao, Contact Hamiltonian dynamics: Variational principles, invariants, completeness and periodic behavior, Ann. Physics, 395 (2018), 26-44.  doi: 10.1016/j.aop.2018.04.035.  Google Scholar

[27]

S. G. Rajeev, A Hamilton-Jacobi formalism for thermodynamics, Ann. Physics, 323 (2008), 2265-2285.  doi: 10.1016/j.aop.2007.12.007.  Google Scholar

[28]

H. RamirezB. Maschke and D. Sbarbaro, Partial stabilization of input-output contact systems on a Legendre submanifold, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 62 (2017), 1431-1437.  doi: 10.1109/TAC.2016.2572403.  Google Scholar

[29]

D. Sloan, Scale symmetry and friction, Symmetry, 13 (2021).  doi: 10.3390/sym13091639.  Google Scholar

[30]

D. Sloan, Dynamical similarity, Phys. Rev. D, 97 (2018), 123541.  doi: 10.1103/physrevd.97.123541.  Google Scholar

[31]

K. WangL. Wang and J. Yan, Implicit variational principle for contact Hamiltonian systems, Nonlinearity, 30 (2017), 492-515.  doi: 10.1088/1361-6544/30/2/492.  Google Scholar

[32]

K. WangL. Wang and J. Yan, Variational principle for contact Hamiltonian systems and its applications, J. Math. Pures Appl., 123 (2019), 167-200.  doi: 10.1016/j.matpur.2018.08.011.  Google Scholar

[33]

K. WangL. Wang and J. Yan, Aubry-Mather theory for contact Hamiltonian systems, Comm. Math. Phys., 366 (2019), 981-1023.  doi: 10.1007/s00220-019-03362-2.  Google Scholar

[34]

Y. Wang and J. Yan, A variational principle for contact Hamiltonian systems, J. Differential Equations, 267 (2019), 4047-4088.  doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2019.04.031.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1] V. I. Arnold, Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989.  doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-2063-1.  Google Scholar
[2]

A. Ashtekar, Introduction to loop quantum gravity and cosmology, Quantum Gravity and Quantum Cosmology, (eds. G. Calcagni, L. Papantonopoulos, G. Siopsis and N. Tsamis), Lecture Notes in Physics, Berlin, Heidelberg, 863 (2013). Google Scholar

[3]

C. P. Boyer, Completely integrable contact Hamiltonian systems and toric contact ctructures on $\mathbb{S}^2\times \mathbb{S}^3$, SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom. Methods Appl., 7 (2011), 1-22.  doi: 10.3842/SIGMA.2011.058.  Google Scholar

[4]

A. Bravetti, Contact Hamiltonian dynamics: The concept and its use, Entropy, 19 (2017), 535.  doi: 10.3390/e19100535.  Google Scholar

[5]

A. BravettiH. Cruz and D. Tapias, Contact Hamiltonian mechanics, Annals Physics, 376 (2017), 17-39.  doi: 10.1016/j.aop.2016.11.003.  Google Scholar

[6]

A. BravettiM. de LeónJ. C. Marrero and E. Padrón, Invariant measures for contact Hamiltonian systems: Symplectic sandwiches with contact bread, J. Phys. A, 53 (2020), 455205.  doi: 10.1088/1751-8121/abbaaa.  Google Scholar

[7]

A. Bravetti, M. Seri and F. Zadra, New directions for contact integrators, Geometric Science of Information, (eds. F. Nielsen and F. Barbaresco), Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences, Springer, 2021. Google Scholar

[8]

A. Bravetti and D. Tapias, Thermostat algorithm for generating target ensembles, Phys. Rev. E, 93 (2016), 022139.  doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.93.022139.  Google Scholar

[9]

P. Cannarsa, W. Cheng, K. Wang and J. Yan, Herglotz' generalized variational principle and contact type Hamilton-Jacobi equations, Trends in Control Theory and Partial Differential Equations, (eds. F. Alabau-Boussouira, F. Ancona, A. Porretta and C. Sinestrari), Springer INdAM Series, 32 (2019), 39–67.  Google Scholar

[10]

Y. ChenQ. Liu and H. Su, Generalized Hamiltonian forms of dissipative mechanical systems via a unified approach, J. Geom. Phys., 160 (2021), 103976.  doi: 10.1016/j.geomphys.2020.103976.  Google Scholar

[11]

F. CiagliaH. Cruz and G. Marmo, Contact manifolds and dissipation, classical and quantum, Ann. Physics, 398 (2018), 159-179.  doi: 10.1016/j.aop.2018.09.012.  Google Scholar

[12]

A. DaviniA. FathiR. Iturriaga and M. Zavidovique, Convergence of the solutions of the discounted Hamilton-Jacobi equation, Invent. Math., 206 (2016), 29-55.  doi: 10.1007/s00222-016-0648-6.  Google Scholar

[13]

M. de León and M. Lainz Valcázar, Contact hamiltonian systems, J. Math. Phys., 60 (2019), 102902.  doi: 10.1063/1.5096475.  Google Scholar

[14]

M. de León and M. Lainz Valcázar, Infinitesimal symmetries in contact Hamiltonian systems, J. Geom. Phys., 153 (2020), 103651.  doi: 10.1016/j.geomphys.2020.103651.  Google Scholar

[15]

M. de LeónM. Lainz and A. Muñiz-Brea, The Hamilton–Jacobi theory for contact Hamiltonian systems, Mathematics, 9 (2021), 1993.   Google Scholar

[16]

J. GasetX. GràciaM. C. Muñoz-LecandaX. Rivas and N. Rom án-Roy, New contributions to the Hamiltonian and Lagrangian contact formalisms for dissipative mechanical systems and their symmetries, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys., 17 (2020), 2050090.  doi: 10.1142/S0219887820500905.  Google Scholar

[17] M. Giaquinta and S. Hildebrandt, Calculus of Variations I, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996.   Google Scholar
[18]

S. Grillo and E. Padrón, Extended Hamilton–Jacobi theory, contact manifolds, and integrability by quadratures, J. Math. Phys., 61 (2020), 012901.  doi: 10.1063/1.5133153.  Google Scholar

[19]

M. Grmela and H. C. Őttinger, Dynamics and thermodynamics of complex fluids. I. Development of a general formalism, Phys. Rev. E, 56 (1997), 6620-6632.  doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.56.6620.  Google Scholar

[20]

S. Gryb and D. Sloan, When scale is surplus, Synthese, (2021).  doi: 10.1007/s11229-021-03443-7.  Google Scholar

[21]

S. Gryb and D. Sloan, New action for cosmology, Phys. Rev. D, 103 (2021), 043524.  doi: 10.1103/physrevd.103.043524.  Google Scholar

[22]

J. HongW. ChengS. Hu and K. Zhao, Representation formulas for contact type Hamilton-Jacobi equations, J. Dyn. Diff. Equat., (2021).  doi: 10.1007/s10884-021-09960-w.  Google Scholar

[23]

R. Huang, A qd-type method for computing generalized singular values of BF matrix pairs with sign regularity to high relative accuracy, Math. Comp., 89 (2020), 229-252.  doi: 10.1090/mcom/3444.  Google Scholar

[24]

A. L. Kholodenko, Applications of Contact Geometry and Topology in Physics, World Scientific, Singapore, 2013. doi: 10.1142/8514.  Google Scholar

[25]

Q. LiuX. Li and D. Qian, An abstract theorem on the existence of periodic motions of non-autonomous Lagrange systems, J. Differential Equations, 261 (2016), 5784-5802.  doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2016.08.010.  Google Scholar

[26]

Q. LiuP. J. Torres and W. Chao, Contact Hamiltonian dynamics: Variational principles, invariants, completeness and periodic behavior, Ann. Physics, 395 (2018), 26-44.  doi: 10.1016/j.aop.2018.04.035.  Google Scholar

[27]

S. G. Rajeev, A Hamilton-Jacobi formalism for thermodynamics, Ann. Physics, 323 (2008), 2265-2285.  doi: 10.1016/j.aop.2007.12.007.  Google Scholar

[28]

H. RamirezB. Maschke and D. Sbarbaro, Partial stabilization of input-output contact systems on a Legendre submanifold, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 62 (2017), 1431-1437.  doi: 10.1109/TAC.2016.2572403.  Google Scholar

[29]

D. Sloan, Scale symmetry and friction, Symmetry, 13 (2021).  doi: 10.3390/sym13091639.  Google Scholar

[30]

D. Sloan, Dynamical similarity, Phys. Rev. D, 97 (2018), 123541.  doi: 10.1103/physrevd.97.123541.  Google Scholar

[31]

K. WangL. Wang and J. Yan, Implicit variational principle for contact Hamiltonian systems, Nonlinearity, 30 (2017), 492-515.  doi: 10.1088/1361-6544/30/2/492.  Google Scholar

[32]

K. WangL. Wang and J. Yan, Variational principle for contact Hamiltonian systems and its applications, J. Math. Pures Appl., 123 (2019), 167-200.  doi: 10.1016/j.matpur.2018.08.011.  Google Scholar

[33]

K. WangL. Wang and J. Yan, Aubry-Mather theory for contact Hamiltonian systems, Comm. Math. Phys., 366 (2019), 981-1023.  doi: 10.1007/s00220-019-03362-2.  Google Scholar

[34]

Y. Wang and J. Yan, A variational principle for contact Hamiltonian systems, J. Differential Equations, 267 (2019), 4047-4088.  doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2019.04.031.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  In $ \mathbb{R}^3 $, the invariant set $ \Omega_0 $ of system (10) consists of two equilibrium points $ (0,0,\pm\sqrt{2}) $ and infinitely many heteroclinic orbits, where we take $ h = 1 $
Figure 2.  The invariant set $ \Omega_0 $ of system (11) consists of four equilibrium points $ (0,0,\pm(R\pm r)) $ and infinitely many heteroclinic orbits, where we take $ R = 2, r = 1 $. Three different curves with red, blue and green colors correspond to three heteroclinic orbits of system (11) starting from the initial values $ (-0.01,0.01,-2.999933331759) $, $ (0.01,-0.01,-1.0000000025) $, $ (-0.01,0.01,1.0000000025) $, respectively
Figure 3.  The periodic orbits are located on the planes perpendicular to the $ xOp $-plane
[1]

Peter Giesl, James McMichen. Determination of the basin of attraction of a periodic orbit in two dimensions using meshless collocation. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2016, 3 (2) : 191-210. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2016010

[2]

Peter Giesl. Necessary condition for the basin of attraction of a periodic orbit in non-smooth periodic systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2007, 18 (2&3) : 355-373. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2007.18.355

[3]

Michihiro Hirayama. Periodic probability measures are dense in the set of invariant measures. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2003, 9 (5) : 1185-1192. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2003.9.1185

[4]

Tatiane C. Batista, Juliano S. Gonschorowski, Fábio A. Tal. Density of the set of endomorphisms with a maximizing measure supported on a periodic orbit. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2015, 35 (8) : 3315-3326. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.3315

[5]

V. Barbu. Periodic solutions to unbounded Hamiltonian system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1995, 1 (2) : 277-283. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1995.1.277

[6]

Jihua Yang, Erli Zhang, Mei Liu. Limit cycle bifurcations of a piecewise smooth Hamiltonian system with a generalized heteroclinic loop through a cusp. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2017, 16 (6) : 2321-2336. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2017114

[7]

Takashi Kajiwara. A Heteroclinic Solution to a Variational Problem Corresponding to FitzHugh-Nagumo type Reaction-Diffusion System with Heterogeneity. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2017, 16 (6) : 2133-2156. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2017106

[8]

Al Momin. Contact homology of orbit complements and implied existence. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2011, 5 (3) : 409-472. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2011.5.409

[9]

Fei Liu, Jaume Llibre, Xiang Zhang. Heteroclinic orbits for a class of Hamiltonian systems on Riemannian manifolds. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2011, 29 (3) : 1097-1111. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.29.1097

[10]

Christopher K. R. T. Jones, Siu-Kei Tin. Generalized exchange lemmas and orbits heteroclinic to invariant manifolds. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2009, 2 (4) : 967-1023. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2009.2.967

[11]

Qiong Meng, X. H. Tang. Solutions of a second-order Hamiltonian system with periodic boundary conditions. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2010, 9 (4) : 1053-1067. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2010.9.1053

[12]

Manuel de León, Víctor M. Jiménez, Manuel Lainz. Contact Hamiltonian and Lagrangian systems with nonholonomic constraints. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2021, 13 (1) : 25-53. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2021001

[13]

Maria Carvalho, Alexander Lohse, Alexandre A. P. Rodrigues. Moduli of stability for heteroclinic cycles of periodic solutions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2019, 39 (11) : 6541-6564. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019284

[14]

Guowei Yu. Ray and heteroclinic solutions of Hamiltonian systems with 2 degrees of freedom. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2013, 33 (10) : 4769-4793. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.4769

[15]

Jingli Ren, Zhibo Cheng, Stefan Siegmund. Positive periodic solution for Brillouin electron beam focusing system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2011, 16 (1) : 385-392. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2011.16.385

[16]

Tifei Qian, Zhihong Xia. Heteroclinic orbits and chaotic invariant sets for monotone twist maps. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2003, 9 (1) : 69-95. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2003.9.69

[17]

Fágner D. Araruna, Flank D. M. Bezerra, Milton L. Oliveira. Rate of attraction for a semilinear thermoelastic system with variable coefficients. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (7) : 3211-3226. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018316

[18]

Peter Giesl. Converse theorem on a global contraction metric for a periodic orbit. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2019, 39 (9) : 5339-5363. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019218

[19]

Oksana Koltsova, Lev Lerman. Hamiltonian dynamics near nontransverse homoclinic orbit to saddle-focus equilibrium. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2009, 25 (3) : 883-913. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.25.883

[20]

Fatima Ezzahra Lembarki, Jaume Llibre. Periodic orbits for a generalized Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Hamiltonian system in dimension $6$. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2015, 8 (6) : 1165-1211. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2015.8.1165

2020 Impact Factor: 1.327

Article outline

Figures and Tables

[Back to Top]