American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
March  2009, 2(1): 17-36. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2009.2.17

Non-autonomous attractors for integro-differential evolution equations

Tomás Caraballo 1, and  P.E. Kloeden 2,

1. 

Dpto. Ecuaciones Diferenciales y Análisis Numérico, Universidad de Sevilla, Apdo. de Correos 1160, 41080-Sevilla
2. 

FB Mathematik, Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität, Postfach 11 19 32, D-60054 Frankfurt a.M.

Received  May 2008 Revised  July 2008 Published  January 2009

We show that infinite-dimensional integro-differential equations which involve an integral of the solution over the time interval since starting can be formulated as non-autonomous delay differential equations with an infinite delay. Moreover, when conditions guaranteeing uniqueness of solutions do not hold, they generate a non-autonomous (possibly) multi-valued dynamical system (MNDS). The pullback attractors here are defined with respect to a universe of subsets of the state space with sub-exponetial growth, rather than restricted to bounded sets. The theory of non-autonomous pullback attractors is extended to such MNDS in a general setting and then applied to the original integro-differential equations. Examples based on the logistic equations with and without a diffusion term are considered.
Keywords: Integro-differential equation, set-valued process, differential equation with infinite delay, pullback attractor., set-valued non-autonomous dynamical system.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 34G25, 34K25, 35R10; Secondary: 34D45, 37C70, 47H2.
Citation: Tomás Caraballo, P.E. Kloeden. Non-autonomous attractors for integro-differential evolution equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2009, 2 (1) : 17-36. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2009.2.17
[1]

Mariusz Michta. Stochastic inclusions with non-continuous set-valued operators. Conference Publications, 2009, 2009 (Special) : 548-557. doi: 10.3934/proc.2009.2009.548
[2]

Roger Metzger, Carlos Arnoldo Morales Rojas, Phillipe Thieullen. Topological stability in set-valued dynamics. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (5) : 1965-1975. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017115
[3]

Dante Carrasco-Olivera, Roger Metzger Alvan, Carlos Arnoldo Morales Rojas. Topological entropy for set-valued maps. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2015, 20 (10) : 3461-3474. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2015.20.3461
[4]

Geng-Hua Li, Sheng-Jie Li. Unified optimality conditions for set-valued optimizations. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2019, 15 (3) : 1101-1116. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018087
[5]

Yu Zhang, Tao Chen. Minimax problems for set-valued mappings with set optimization. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2014, 4 (4) : 327-340. doi: 10.3934/naco.2014.4.327
[6]

Qingbang Zhang, Caozong Cheng, Xuanxuan Li. Generalized minimax theorems for two set-valued mappings. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2013, 9 (1) : 1-12. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2013.9.1
[7]

Sina Greenwood, Rolf Suabedissen. 2-manifolds and inverse limits of set-valued functions on intervals. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2017, 37 (11) : 5693-5706. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017246
[8]

Zhenhua Peng, Zhongping Wan, Weizhi Xiong. Sensitivity analysis in set-valued optimization under strictly minimal efficiency. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2017, 6 (3) : 427-436. doi: 10.3934/eect.2017022
[9]

Guolin Yu. Topological properties of Henig globally efficient solutions of set-valued problems. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2014, 4 (4) : 309-316. doi: 10.3934/naco.2014.4.309
[10]

Qilin Wang, Liu He, Shengjie Li. Higher-order weak radial epiderivatives and non-convex set-valued optimization problems. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2019, 15 (2) : 465-480. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018051
[11]

Zengjing Chen, Yuting Lan, Gaofeng Zong. Strong law of large numbers for upper set-valued and fuzzy-set valued probability. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2015, 5 (3) : 435-452. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2015.5.435
[12]

Jiawei Chen, Zhongping Wan, Liuyang Yuan. Existence of solutions and $\alpha$-well-posedness for a system of constrained set-valued variational inequalities. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2013, 3 (3) : 567-581. doi: 10.3934/naco.2013.3.567
[13]

Rodrigo Samprogna, Tomás Caraballo. Pullback attractor for a dynamic boundary non-autonomous problem with Infinite Delay. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (2) : 509-523. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017195
[14]

T. Caraballo, J. A. Langa, J. Valero. Structure of the pullback attractor for a non-autonomous scalar differential inclusion. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2016, 9 (4) : 979-994. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016037
[15]

C. R. Chen, S. J. Li. Semicontinuity of the solution set map to a set-valued weak vector variational inequality. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2007, 3 (3) : 519-528. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2007.3.519
[16]

Wen Tan. The regularity of pullback attractor for a non-autonomous p-Laplacian equation with dynamical boundary condition. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (2) : 529-546. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018194
[17]

Samir K. Bhowmik, Dugald B. Duncan, Michael Grinfeld, Gabriel J. Lord. Finite to infinite steady state solutions, bifurcations of an integro-differential equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2011, 16 (1) : 57-71. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2011.16.57
[18]

Guolin Yu. Global proper efficiency and vector optimization with cone-arcwise connected set-valued maps. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2016, 6 (1) : 35-44. doi: 10.3934/naco.2016.6.35
[19]

Yihong Xu, Zhenhua Peng. Higher-order sensitivity analysis in set-valued optimization under Henig efficiency. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (1) : 313-327. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016019
[20]

Benjamin Seibold, Morris R. Flynn, Aslan R. Kasimov, Rodolfo R. Rosales. Constructing set-valued fundamental diagrams from Jamiton solutions in second order traffic models. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2013, 8 (3) : 745-772. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2013.8.745

2018 Impact Factor: 0.545

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (24)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (33)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2019 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences