American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
December  2009, 2(4): 851-872. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2009.2.851

Homoclinic orbits of the FitzHugh-Nagumo equation: The singular-limit

John Guckenheimer 1, and  Christian Kuehn 2,

1. 

Mathematics Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, United States
2. 

Center for Applied Mathematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, United States

Received  September 2008 Revised  April 2009 Published  September 2009

The FitzHugh-Nagumo equation has been investigated with a wide array of different methods in the last three decades. Recently a version of the equations with an applied current was analyzed by Champneys, Kirk, Knobloch, Oldeman and Sneyd [5] using numerical continuation methods. They obtained a complicated bifurcation diagram in parameter space featuring a C-shaped curve of homoclinic bifurcations and a U-shaped curve of Hopf bifurcations. We use techniques from multiple time-scale dynamics to understand the structures of this bifurcation diagram based on geometric singular perturbation analysis of the FitzHugh-Nagumo equation. Numerical and analytical techniques show that if the ratio of the time-scales in the FitzHugh-Nagumo equation tends to zero, then our singular limit analysis correctly represents the observed CU-structure. Geometric insight from the analysis can even be used to compute bifurcation curves which are inaccessible via continuation methods. The results of our analysis are summarized in a singular bifurcation diagram.
Keywords: geometric singular perturbation theory, invariant manifolds., Homoclinic bifurcation.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 34E13, 34E15, 37G20, 37D10; Secondary: 34C26, 37D4.
Citation: John Guckenheimer, Christian Kuehn. Homoclinic orbits of the FitzHugh-Nagumo equation: The singular-limit. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2009, 2 (4) : 851-872. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2009.2.851
[1]

Pablo Aguirre, Bernd Krauskopf, Hinke M. Osinga. Global invariant manifolds near a Shilnikov homoclinic bifurcation. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2014, 1 (1) : 1-38. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2014.1.1
[2]

Ilona Gucwa, Peter Szmolyan. Geometric singular perturbation analysis of an autocatalator model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2009, 2 (4) : 783-806. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2009.2.783
[3]

Mazyar Ghani Varzaneh, Sebastian Riedel. A dynamical theory for singular stochastic delay differential equations Ⅱ: nonlinear equations and invariant manifolds. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (8) : 4587-4612. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020304
[4]

Feifei Cheng, Ji Li. Geometric singular perturbation analysis of Degasperis-Procesi equation with distributed delay. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021, 41 (2) : 967-985. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020305
[5]

Chaoqun Huang, Nung Kwan Yip. Singular perturbation and bifurcation of diffuse transition layers in inhomogeneous media, part II. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2015, 10 (4) : 897-948. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2015.10.897
[6]

Chaoqun Huang, Nung Kwan Yip. Singular perturbation and bifurcation of diffuse transition layers in inhomogeneous media, part I. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2013, 8 (4) : 1009-1034. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2013.8.1009
[7]

Flaviano Battelli. Saddle-node bifurcation of homoclinic orbits in singular systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2001, 7 (1) : 203-218. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2001.7.203
[8]

Fabio Camilli, Annalisa Cesaroni. A note on singular perturbation problems via Aubry-Mather theory. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2007, 17 (4) : 807-819. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2007.17.807
[9]

John M. Hong, Cheng-Hsiung Hsu, Bo-Chih Huang, Tzi-Sheng Yang. Geometric singular perturbation approach to the existence and instability of stationary waves for viscous traffic flow models. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2013, 12 (3) : 1501-1526. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2013.12.1501
[10]

Heinz Schättler, Urszula Ledzewicz. Perturbation feedback control: A geometric interpretation. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2012, 2 (3) : 631-654. doi: 10.3934/naco.2012.2.631
[11]

Stéphane Chrétien, Sébastien Darses, Christophe Guyeux, Paul Clarkson. On the pinning controllability of complex networks using perturbation theory of extreme singular values. application to synchronisation in power grids. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2017, 7 (3) : 289-299. doi: 10.3934/naco.2017019
[12]

J. B. van den Berg, J. D. Mireles James. Parameterization of slow-stable manifolds and their invariant vector bundles: Theory and numerical implementation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2016, 36 (9) : 4637-4664. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016002
[13]

Rovella Alvaro, Vilamajó Francesc, Romero Neptalí. Invariant manifolds for delay endomorphisms. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2001, 7 (1) : 35-50. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2001.7.35
[14]

Andrew D. Lewis, David R. Tyner. Geometric Jacobian linearization and LQR theory. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2010, 2 (4) : 397-440. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2010.2.397
[15]

Simone Farinelli. Geometric arbitrage theory and market dynamics. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2015, 7 (4) : 431-471. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2015.7.431
[16]

Ulrike Kant, Werner M. Seiler. Singularities in the geometric theory of differential equations. Conference Publications, 2011, 2011 (Special) : 784-793. doi: 10.3934/proc.2011.2011.784
[17]

Eduard Marušić-Paloka, Igor Pažanin. Homogenization and singular perturbation in porous media. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2021, 20 (2) : 533-545. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020279
[18]

John Guckenheimer, Hinke M. Osinga. The singular limit of a Hopf bifurcation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2012, 32 (8) : 2805-2823. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.2805
[19]

Y. Latushkin, B. Layton. The optimal gap condition for invariant manifolds. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1999, 5 (2) : 233-268. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1999.5.233
[20]

Leonardo Mora. Homoclinic bifurcations, fat attractors and invariant curves. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2003, 9 (5) : 1133-1148. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2003.9.1133

2019 Impact Factor: 1.233

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (60)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (29)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2021 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences