# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

October  2016, 9(5): 1575-1590. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016064

## Homogenization: In mathematics or physics?

 1 Department of Mathematics, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China 2 High Speed Aerodynamics Institute, China Aerodynamisc Development and Research Center, Mianyang 622661, China

Received  November 2014 Revised  September 2015 Published  October 2016

In mathematics, homogenization theory considers the limitations of the sequences of the problems and their solutions when a parameter tends to zero. This parameter is regarded as the ratio of the characteristic size between the micro scale and macro scale. So what is considered is a sequence of problems in a fixed domain while the characteristic size in micro scale tends to zero. But in the real physics or engineering situations, the micro scale of a medium is fixed and can not be changed. In the process of homogenization, it is the size in macro scale which becomes larger and larger and tends to infinity. We observe that the homogenization in physics is not equivalent to the homogenization in mathematics up to some simple rescaling. With some direct error estimates, we explain in what sense we can accept the homogenized problem as the limitation of the original real physical problems. As a byproduct, we present some results on the mathematical homogenization of some problems with source term being only weakly compacted in $H^{-1}$, while in standard homogenization theory, the source term is assumed to be at least compacted in $H^{-1}$. A real example is also given to show the validation of our observation and results.
Citation: Shixin Xu, Xingye Yue, Changrong Zhang. Homogenization: In mathematics or physics?. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2016, 9 (5) : 1575-1590. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016064
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
 [1] Di Wu, Yanqin Bai, Fusheng Xie. Time-scaling transformation for optimal control problem with time-varying delay. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 0 (0) : 0-0. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020098 [2] Lyndsey Clark. The $\beta$-transformation with a hole. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2016, 36 (3) : 1249-1269. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016.36.1249 [3] Christian Lax, Sebastian Walcher. Singular perturbations and scaling. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020, 25 (1) : 1-29. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019170 [4] Marc Chamberland, Victor H. Moll. Dynamics of the degree six Landen transformation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2006, 15 (3) : 905-919. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.15.905 [5] Oğul Esen, Partha Guha. On the geometry of the Schmidt-Legendre transformation. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2018, 10 (3) : 251-291. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2018010 [6] Shinsuke Koyama, Ryota Kobayashi. Fluctuation scaling in neural spike trains. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2016, 13 (3) : 537-550. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2016006 [7] M. Baake, P. Gohlke, M. Kesseböhmer, T. Schindler. Scaling properties of the Thue–Morse measure. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2019, 39 (7) : 4157-4185. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019168 [8] Nalini Joshi, Pavlos Kassotakis. Re-factorising a QRT map. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2019, 6 (2) : 325-343. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2019016 [9] Yuanhong Chen, Chao Ma, Jun Wu. Moving recurrent properties for the doubling map on the unit interval. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2016, 36 (6) : 2969-2979. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016.36.2969 [10] Sze-Bi Hsu, Bernold Fiedler, Hsiu-Hau Lin. Classification of potential flows under renormalization group transformation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (2) : 437-446. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016.21.437 [11] N. Kamran, K. Tenenblat. Periodic systems for the higher-dimensional Laplace transformation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 1998, 4 (2) : 359-378. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1998.4.359 [12] Hyukjin Kwean. Kwak transformation and Navier-Stokes equations. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2004, 3 (3) : 433-446. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2004.3.433 [13] E. García-Toraño Andrés, Bavo Langerock, Frans Cantrijn. Aspects of reduction and transformation of Lagrangian systems with symmetry. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2014, 6 (1) : 1-23. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2014.6.1 [14] Andrey Kochergin. A Besicovitch cylindrical transformation with Hölder function. Electronic Research Announcements, 2015, 22: 87-91. doi: 10.3934/era.2015.22.87 [15] Xian Chen, Zhi-Ming Ma. A transformation of Markov jump processes and applications in genetic study. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2014, 34 (12) : 5061-5084. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.5061 [16] Hong-Gunn Chew, Cheng-Chew Lim. On regularisation parameter transformation of support vector machines. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2009, 5 (2) : 403-415. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2009.5.403 [17] Hongyu Liu, Ting Zhou. Two dimensional invisibility cloaking via transformation optics. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2011, 31 (2) : 525-543. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.31.525 [18] Fernando P. da Costa, João T. Pinto, Rafael Sasportes. On the convergence to critical scaling profiles in submonolayer deposition models. Kinetic & Related Models, 2018, 11 (6) : 1359-1376. doi: 10.3934/krm.2018053 [19] Qi-Rui Li, Xu-Jia Wang. Regularity of the homogeneous Monge-Ampère equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2015, 35 (12) : 6069-6084. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.6069 [20] Sohana Jahan, Hou-Duo Qi. Regularized multidimensional scaling with radial basis functions. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2016, 12 (2) : 543-563. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016.12.543

2018 Impact Factor: 0.545