In the context of nanowire heterostructures we perform a discrete to continuum limit of the corresponding free energy by means of Γ-convergence techniques. Nearest neighbours are identified by employing the notions of Voronoi diagrams and Delaunay triangulations. The scaling of the nanowire is done in such a way that we perform not only a continuum limit but a dimension reduction simultaneously. The main part of the proof is a discrete geometric rigidity result that we announced in an earlier work and show here in detail for a variety of three-dimensional lattices. We perform the passage from discrete to continuum twice: once for a system that compensates a lattice mismatch between two parts of the heterogeneous nanowire without defects and once for a system that creates dislocations. It turns out that we can verify the experimentally observed fact that the nanowires show dislocations when the radius of the specimen is large.
Citation: |
Figure 4. Cubic cell in the diamond lattice $\mathcal{L}^{\rm{D}}$. Atoms from the sublattice $\mathcal{L}^{\rm{D}}_1$ are represented in black/grey, while white atoms are from the sublattice $\mathcal{L}^{\rm{D}}_2$. Nearest-neighbour bonds are displayed by solid thick lines. Moreover, the picture shows a tetrahedron from the Delaunay pretriangulation of $\mathcal{L}^{\rm{D}}_1$: its edges (solid and dashed thin lines) correspond to next-to-nearest neighbours in $\mathcal{L}^{\rm{D}}$. A white atom lies at the barycentre of the tetrahedron, which is further divided into four irregular tetrahedra by the bonds between the barycentre and each vertex
Figure 5. Bonds and triangulation in a honeycomb lattice. The lattice is given by $\mathcal{L}^✡:=\mathcal{L}^✡_1 \cup \mathcal{L}^✡_2$, where $\mathcal{L}^✡_i:={\rm{u}}_i^✡ + \xi_1{\rm{v}}^✡_1+\xi_2{\rm{v}}^✡_2 \colon \ \xi_1,\xi_2 \in\mathbb{Z}\}$, ${\rm{v}}^✡_1:=(1,0)$, ${\rm{v}}^✡_2:=(\frac12,\frac{\sqrt3}2)$, ${\rm{u}}^✡_1:=(0,0)$, ${\rm{u}}^✡_2:=(0,\frac{\sqrt3}3)$. This results into two interpenetrating sublattices $\mathcal{L}^✡_1$ and $\mathcal{L}^✡_2$, both being hexagonal (i.e., equilateral triangular). Atoms from $\mathcal{L}^✡_1$ and $\mathcal{L}^✡_2$ are displayed in different colors in the picture, respectively in black and in white. In the left part of the figure we indicate nearest neighbour (solid) and next-to-nearest neighbour bonds (dashed lines). The right part of the figure shows a possible triangulation, that is the natural triangulation of $\mathcal{L}^✡_1$ enriched by considering the nearest-neighbour bonds between atoms $x\in\mathcal{L}^✡_1$ and $y\in\mathcal{L}^✡_2$. This corresponds to ignoring the bonds between atoms of $\mathcal{L}^✡_2$, cf. Section 2.3
Figure 7. Dislocations in a honeycomb-type lattice. The bonds at the interface are chosen in the following way: First one considers only black atoms and finds a Delaunay pretriangulation, which is then refined to a triangulation (dashed lines); the same is done for white atoms (dotted lines). The dashed and dotted lines thus obtained give the bonds between next-to-nearest neighbours. Finally, each white (resp. black) atom lying inside a triangle formed by three black (resp. white) atoms is connected to the vertices of that triangle by nearest-neighbour bonds (solid lines)
R. Alicandro, G. Lazzaroni and M. Palombaro, Derivation of a rod theory from lattice systems with interactions beyond nearest neighbours Preprint SISSA 58/2016/MATE. | |
A. Braides , M. Solci and E. Vitali , A derivation of linear elastic energies from pair-interaction atomistic systems, Netw. Heterog. Media, 2 (2007) , 551-567. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2007.2.551. | |
E. Ertekin , P. A. Greaney , D. C. Chrzan and T. D. Sands , Equilibrium limits of coherency in strained nanowire heterostructures, J. Appl. Phys., 97 (2005) , 114325. | |
S. Fanzon, M. Palombaro and M. Ponsiglione, A variational model for dislocations at semi-coherent interfaces, Preprint arXiv: 1512. 03795 (2015). | |
L. Flatley and F. Theil , Face-centered cubic crystallization of atomistic configurations, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 218 (2015) , 363-416. doi: 10.1007/s00205-015-0862-1. | |
G. Friesecke , R. D. James and S. Müller , A theorem on geometric rigidity and the derivation of nonlinear plate theory from three-dimensional elasticity, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 55 (2002) , 1461-1506. doi: 10.1002/cpa.10048. | |
G. Friesecke and F. Theil , Validity and failure of the Cauchy-Born Hypothesis in a two-dimensional mass-spring lattice, J. Nonlinear Sci., 12 (2002) , 445-478. doi: 10.1007/s00332-002-0495-z. | |
G. Grosso and G. Pastori Parravicini, Solid State Physics, 2nd edition, Academic Press, Elsevier, Oxford, 2014. | |
P. M. Gruber and J. M. Willis, eds. , Handbook of Convex Geometry, Volume A. , Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. , North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1993. | |
K. L. Kavanagh , Misfit dislocations in nanowire heterostructures, Semicond. Sci. Technol., 25 (2010) , 024006. | |
G. Lazzaroni , M. Palombaro and A. Schlömerkemper , A discrete to continuum analysis of dislocations in nanowire heterostructures, Commun. Math. Sci., 13 (2015) , 1105-1133. doi: 10.4310/CMS.2015.v13.n5.a3. | |
G. Lazzaroni , M. Palombaro and A. Schlömerkemper , Dislocations in nanowire heterostructures: From discrete to continuum, Proc. Appl. Math. Mech., 13 (2013) , 541-544. | |
S. Müller and M. Palombaro , Derivation of a rod theory for biphase materials with dislocations at the interface, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 48 (2013) , 315-335. doi: 10.1007/s00526-012-0552-x. | |
B. Schmidt , A derivation of continuum nonlinear plate theory from atomistic models, Multiscale Model. Simul., 5 (2006) , 664-694. doi: 10.1137/050646251. | |
V. Schmidt , J. V. Wittemann and U. Gösele , Growth, thermodynamics, and electrical properties of silicon nanowires, Chem. Rev., 110 (2010) , 361-388. | |
F. Theil , A proof of crystallization in two dimensions, Comm. Math. Phys., 262 (2006) , 209-236. doi: 10.1007/s00220-005-1458-7. |
In the face-centred cubic lattice the nearest-neighbour structure of the atoms provides a subdivision of the space into tetrahedra (A) and octahedra (B). Figure (C) shows a quarter of an octahedron in the same unit cell. Grey dots denote points lying on the hidden facets
The hexagonal close-packed lattice is associated with a tessellation of tetrahedra and octahedra as the ones in the figure. Only some of the bonds and some of the polyhedra of the pretriangulation are displayed
The body-centred cubic lattice is associated with a tessellation of irregular tetrahedra as the one in the figure
Cubic cell in the diamond lattice
Bonds and triangulation in a honeycomb lattice. The lattice is given by
By cutting a cubic lattice along certain transverse planes, one finds two-dimensional hexagonal Bravais lattices. (A) face-centred; (B) body-centred
Dislocations in a honeycomb-type lattice. The bonds at the interface are chosen in the following way: First one considers only black atoms and finds a Delaunay pretriangulation, which is then refined to a triangulation (dashed lines); the same is done for white atoms (dotted lines). The dashed and dotted lines thus obtained give the bonds between next-to-nearest neighbours. Finally, each white (resp. black) atom lying inside a triangle formed by three black (resp. white) atoms is connected to the vertices of that triangle by nearest-neighbour bonds (solid lines)
The tetrahedron
The octahedron
(A) The image of