Figure 1.
Principle of the flying boat with foils
-
Previous Article
Direct construction of symmetry-breaking directions in bifurcation problems with spherical symmetry
- DCDS-S Home
- This Issue
-
Next Article
Complex ray in anisotropic solids: Extended Fermat's principle
October
2019, 12(6): 1635-1668.
doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2019111
On the controllability of racing sailing boats with foils
| 1. | Département d'ingénierie mathématique, laboratoire M2N, 292, rue saint Martin, 75003 Paris, France |
| 2. | Laboratoire de mathématiques d'Orsay, UMR 8628, Univ Paris-Sud, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay 91405, France |
The development of foils for racing boats has changed the strategy of sailing. Recently, the America's cup held in San Francisco, has been the theatre of a tragicomic history due to the foils. During the last round, the New-Zealand boat was winning by 8 to 1 against the defender USA. The winner is the first with 9 victories. USA team understood suddenly (may be) how to use the control of the pitching of the main foils by adjusting the rake in order to stabilize the ship. And USA won by 9 victories against 8 to the challenger NZ. Our goal in this paper is to point out few aspects which could be taken into account in order to improve this mysterious control law which is known as the key of the victory of the USA team. There are certainly many reasons and in particular the cleverness of the sailors and of all the engineering team behind this project. But it appears interesting to have a mathematical discussion, even if it is a partial one, on the mechanical behaviour of these extraordinary sailing boats. The numerical examples given here are not the true ones. They have just been invented in order to explain the theoretical developments concerning three points: the possibility of tacking on the foils for sailing upwind, the nature of foiling instabilities, if there are, when the boat is flying and the control laws.
Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary: 35C07, 65M15; Secondary: 35M12, 65T60.
Citation:
Philippe Destuynder, Caroline Fabre. On the controllability of racing sailing boats with foils. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S,
2019, 12
(6)
: 1635-1668.
doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2019111
![]()
References:
| [1] |
R. Bellman,
Dynamic Programming, Dover Publications, Inc., Mineola, NY, 2003. |
| [2] |
H. Brezis,
Analyse Fonctionnelle, edition Masson, Paris, 1983. |
| [3] |
J. Cea,
Optimisation, Théorie et Algorithmes, Dunod, Paris, 1971. |
| [4] |
P.-G. Ciarlet,
Introduction à L'analyse Numérique et à L'optimisation, Masson, Paris, 1982. |
| [5] |
Ph. Destuynder,
Introduction à L'aéroélasticité et à L'aéroacoustique, Hermès-Lavoisier, Paris-Londres, 2008. |
| [6] |
Ph. Destuynder,
Analyse et Contrôle des Équations Différentielles, Hermès-Lavoisier, Paris-Londres, 2010. |
| [7] |
Ph. Destuynder and C. Fabre, Sailing boats with foils, To appear, 2017. Google Scholar |
| [8] |
Ph. Destuynder and M. T. Ribereau,
Non linear dynamics of test models in wind tunnels, Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids, 15 (1996), 91-136.
|
| [9] |
E. H. Dowell, H. C. Curtiss Jr., R. H. Scanlan and F. Sisto, A Modern Course in Aeroelasticity, Monographs and textbooks of solids and fluids. Alphen aan den Rijn, Sijthoff and Noordhoff International Publishers, 1978. Google Scholar |
| [10] |
A. Ducoin and Y.-L. Young, Hydroelastic response and stability of a hydrofoil in viscous flow, in Journ. of Fluids and Structures, 38 (2013), 40–57. Google Scholar |
| [11] |
Y. C. Fung,
An Introduction to the Theory of Aeroelasticity, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York; Chapman & Hall, Ltd., London, 1955. |
| [12] |
A. J. Hermans, G. C. Hsiao and R. Timman,
Water Waves and Ship Hydrodynamics, Delft University Press, The Netherlands, 1985.
doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-3657-2. |
| [13] |
J. L. Lions,
Contrôlabilité Exacte, Perturbations et Stabilisation de Systèmes Distribués, Masson, Paris, 1988. |
| [14] |
J. L. Lions,
Perturbations Singulères dans les Problèmes Aux Limites et en Contrôle Optimal, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1973. |
show all references
References:
| [1] |
R. Bellman,
Dynamic Programming, Dover Publications, Inc., Mineola, NY, 2003. |
| [2] |
H. Brezis,
Analyse Fonctionnelle, edition Masson, Paris, 1983. |
| [3] |
J. Cea,
Optimisation, Théorie et Algorithmes, Dunod, Paris, 1971. |
| [4] |
P.-G. Ciarlet,
Introduction à L'analyse Numérique et à L'optimisation, Masson, Paris, 1982. |
| [5] |
Ph. Destuynder,
Introduction à L'aéroélasticité et à L'aéroacoustique, Hermès-Lavoisier, Paris-Londres, 2008. |
| [6] |
Ph. Destuynder,
Analyse et Contrôle des Équations Différentielles, Hermès-Lavoisier, Paris-Londres, 2010. |
| [7] |
Ph. Destuynder and C. Fabre, Sailing boats with foils, To appear, 2017. Google Scholar |
| [8] |
Ph. Destuynder and M. T. Ribereau,
Non linear dynamics of test models in wind tunnels, Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids, 15 (1996), 91-136.
|
| [9] |
E. H. Dowell, H. C. Curtiss Jr., R. H. Scanlan and F. Sisto, A Modern Course in Aeroelasticity, Monographs and textbooks of solids and fluids. Alphen aan den Rijn, Sijthoff and Noordhoff International Publishers, 1978. Google Scholar |
| [10] |
A. Ducoin and Y.-L. Young, Hydroelastic response and stability of a hydrofoil in viscous flow, in Journ. of Fluids and Structures, 38 (2013), 40–57. Google Scholar |
| [11] |
Y. C. Fung,
An Introduction to the Theory of Aeroelasticity, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York; Chapman & Hall, Ltd., London, 1955. |
| [12] |
A. J. Hermans, G. C. Hsiao and R. Timman,
Water Waves and Ship Hydrodynamics, Delft University Press, The Netherlands, 1985.
doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-3657-2. |
| [13] |
J. L. Lions,
Contrôlabilité Exacte, Perturbations et Stabilisation de Systèmes Distribués, Masson, Paris, 1988. |
| [14] |
J. L. Lions,
Perturbations Singulères dans les Problèmes Aux Limites et en Contrôle Optimal, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1973. |
Figure 2.
Two situations where the controlled foiling could avoid to tack and to loose the race
Figure 3.
The boat with the foils
Figure 4.
Heaving exact control with null initial pitching and $u = 10m/s$
Figure 5.
Heaving exact control with null initial pitching and $u = 15m/s$
Figure 6.
Heaving exact control with nul initial pitching and $u = 20m/s$
Figure 7.
Pitching exact control with nul initial heaving and $u = 10m/s$ . One can observe that the control is very close to bang-bang control (first negative and then positive. It is almost zero after $t = 3 $ sec
Figure 8.
Pitching exact control with nul initial heaving and $u = 15m/s$
Figure 9.
Pitching exact control with nul initial heaving and $u = 20m/s$
Figure 10.
Control with contraints and an initial heaving with null initial pitching and velocity $u = 10m/s$ . One can notice that at the beginning the control is bang-bang and finally the adjustement is interior to the upper bounds of the control. Even if the computations are performed with $T = 10$ sec.; one can see that the exact controllability is quite performed at $t = 5$ sec. with the values chosen which are realistic
Figure 11.
Control with contraints and an initial heaving with null initial pitching and velocity $u = 15m/s$
Figure 12.
Control with contraints and an initial heaving with null initial pitching and velocity $u = 20m/s$
Figure 13.
Control with contraints and an initial pitching with null initial heaving and velocity $u = 10m/s$
Figure 14.
Control with contraints with an initial pitching with null initial heaving and velocity $u = 15m/s$
Figure 15.
Control with contraints with initial pitching with null initial heaving and velocity $u = 20m/s$
Figure 16.
The notations used in this section
Figure 17.
Linear damping of the model (44) (minus the imaginary part of the eigenvalues $\lambda$ ) on the top Figure and the frequencies (real part of $\lambda$ divided by $2\pi$ ) on the bottom one, versus the velocity of the ship ($m./sec.)$
Figure 18.
Several trajectories for different values of $\alpha_{max}$ starting from the same initial condition. One can observe that $\alpha_{max}$ should be adjusted in order to obain the right control. This is why the helmsman has a control box which enables him to adjust $\alpha_{max}$ by steps of $\pm.5^0$
Figure 19.
Several trajectories for different values of $\alpha_{max}$ starting from the same initial condition. One can observe that this control is unuseful. This is why the rocker switcher has to detect the sign of the velocity of the rake and not the one of the angle (the pitching angle)
Figure 20.
OTUSA control of the heaving with velocity 10 m/s
Figure 21.
OTUSA control of the heaving with velocity 15 m/s
Figure 22.
OTUSA control of the heaving with velocity 20 m/s
Figure 23.
OTUSA control of the pitching with velocity 10 m/s
Figure 24.
OTUSA control of the pitching with velocity 15 m/s
Figure 25.
OTUSA control of the pitching with velocity 20 m/s
Figure 26.
The Oracle USA-Team used this mechanical control to win the last eight races in a row. In particular, but not only, it enables them to navigate in the wake of the challenger mainly at the tacking
Figure 27.
Principle of the device used published on internet by ORACLE
| Coefficient | Expression of the coefficients of the matrix |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
|
| Coefficient | Expression of the coefficients of the matrix |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
|
| [1] |
Hong Niu, Zhijiang Feng, Qijin Xiao, Yajun Zhang. A PID control method based on optimal control strategy. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (1) : 117-126. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020019 |
| [2] |
Yuan Tan, Qingyuan Cao, Lan Li, Tianshi Hu, Min Su. A chance-constrained stochastic model predictive control problem with disturbance feedback. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (1) : 67-79. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019099 |
| [3] |
Lars Grüne, Matthias A. Müller, Christopher M. Kellett, Steven R. Weller. Strict dissipativity for discrete time discounted optimal control problems. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2020 doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020046 |
| [4] |
Hai Huang, Xianlong Fu. Optimal control problems for a neutral integro-differential system with infinite delay. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2020 doi: 10.3934/eect.2020107 |
| [5] |
Vaibhav Mehandiratta, Mani Mehra, Günter Leugering. Fractional optimal control problems on a star graph: Optimality system and numerical solution. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2021, 11 (1) : 189-209. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020033 |
| [6] |
Christian Clason, Vu Huu Nhu, Arnd Rösch. Optimal control of a non-smooth quasilinear elliptic equation. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2020 doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020052 |
| [7] |
Hongbo Guan, Yong Yang, Huiqing Zhu. A nonuniform anisotropic FEM for elliptic boundary layer optimal control problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (3) : 1711-1722. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020179 |
| [8] |
Youming Guo, Tingting Li. Optimal control strategies for an online game addiction model with low and high risk exposure. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020 doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020347 |
| [9] |
Pierluigi Colli, Gianni Gilardi, Jürgen Sprekels. Deep quench approximation and optimal control of general Cahn–Hilliard systems with fractional operators and double obstacle potentials. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (1) : 243-271. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020213 |
| [10] |
Stefan Doboszczak, Manil T. Mohan, Sivaguru S. Sritharan. Pontryagin maximum principle for the optimal control of linearized compressible navier-stokes equations with state constraints. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2020 doi: 10.3934/eect.2020110 |
| [11] |
Elimhan N. Mahmudov. Infimal convolution and duality in convex optimal control problems with second order evolution differential inclusions. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2021, 10 (1) : 37-59. doi: 10.3934/eect.2020051 |
| [12] |
Lars Grüne, Roberto Guglielmi. On the relation between turnpike properties and dissipativity for continuous time linear quadratic optimal control problems. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2021, 11 (1) : 169-188. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020032 |
| [13] |
Jingrui Sun, Hanxiao Wang. Mean-field stochastic linear-quadratic optimal control problems: Weak closed-loop solvability. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2021, 11 (1) : 47-71. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020026 |
| [14] |
Arthur Fleig, Lars Grüne. Strict dissipativity analysis for classes of optimal control problems involving probability density functions. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2020 doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020053 |
| [15] |
Jian-Xin Guo, Xing-Long Qu. Robust control in green production management. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021011 |
| [16] |
Bernard Bonnard, Jérémy Rouot. Geometric optimal techniques to control the muscular force response to functional electrical stimulation using a non-isometric force-fatigue model. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2020 doi: 10.3934/jgm.2020032 |
| [17] |
Xu Zhang, Chuang Zheng, Enrique Zuazua. Time discrete wave equations: Boundary observability and control. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2009, 23 (1&2) : 571-604. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.23.571 |
| [18] |
Hui Lv, Xing'an Wang. Dissipative control for uncertain singular markovian jump systems via hybrid impulsive control. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (1) : 127-142. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020020 |
| [19] |
Zuliang Lu, Fei Huang, Xiankui Wu, Lin Li, Shang Liu. Convergence and quasi-optimality of $ L^2- $norms based an adaptive finite element method for nonlinear optimal control problems. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (4) : 1459-1486. doi: 10.3934/era.2020077 |
| [20] |
Awais Younus, Zoubia Dastgeer, Nudrat Ishaq, Abdul Ghaffar, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Devendra Kumar. On the observability of conformable linear time-invariant control systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020 doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020444 |
2019 Impact Factor: 1.233
Tools
Metrics
Other articles
by authors
[Back to Top]