\`x^2+y_1+z_12^34\`
Advanced Search
Article Contents
Article Contents

Sub-Riemannian geometry and finite time thermodynamics Part 1: The stochastic oscillator

  • * Corresponding authors: Yunlong Huang and P. S. Krishnaprasad

    * Corresponding authors: Yunlong Huang and P. S. Krishnaprasad 
Abstract Full Text(HTML) Figure(3) / Table(2) Related Papers Cited by
  • The field of sub-Riemannian geometry has flourished in the past four decades through the strong interactions between problems arising in applied science (in areas such as robotics) and questions of a pure mathematical character about the nature of space. Methods of control theory, such as controllability properties determined by Lie brackets of vector fields, the Hamilton equations associated to the Maximum Principle of optimal control, Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation etc. have all been found to be basic tools for answering such questions. In this paper, we find a useful role for the vantage point of sub-Riemannian geometry in attacking a problem of interest in non-equilibrium statistical mechanics: how does one create rules for operation of micro- and nano-scale systems (heat engines) that are subject to fluctuations from the surroundings, so as to be able to do useful things such as converting heat into work over a cycle of operation? We exploit geometric optimal control theory to produce such rules selected for maximal efficiency. This is done by working concretely with a model problem, the stochastic oscillator. Essential to our work is a separation of time scales used with great efficacy by physicists and justified in the linear response regime.

    Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 49K15, 93E20; Secondary: 82C05.

    Citation:

    \begin{equation} \\ \end{equation}
  • 加载中
  • Figure 1.  Bead-in-trap illustration: (a) realization of stochastic oscillator – an optical trap is deployed by focusing a laser beam with the objective lens. Due to the transfer of momentum from the scattering of incident photons, a colloidal bead near the trap focus will experience a force. When the bead is under stable trapping, the force can be approximated as a gradient force which is in the direction of the spatial light gradient. It is proportional to the optical intensity at the focus and pulls the particle towards the focal region. If the bead is at small displacement away from the focus, the gradient force is also proportional to the displacement. Thus, a bead-in-trap system can be modeled as a spring-mass system. As the bead in the optical trap is immersed in a fluid and is subject to fluctuation (Brownian motion), the optical trap system can be viewed as a heat bath. The temperature of the solution and the stiffness of the potential well (governed by the intensities of the beams) are two controllable parameters. (text adapted from [27]) (b) apparatus for biophysical measurement – in the famous experiment [11] [23] to verify the Jarzynski equality [20], an optical trap is deployed to measure the force exerted on a molecule of RNA which connects two beads. The RNA is subject to irreversible and reversible cycles of folding and unfolding. The actuator controls the position of the right bead and it will stretch the RNA. The optical trap will determine the force exerted on the molecule. The distance between the beads is the end-to-end length of the molecule. The length of the molecule and the exerted force on the molecule give the measurement of the work done on the molecule along different stochastic trajectories which is the essence of the experiment. (text and figure adapted from [11])

    Figure 2.  Reachable set of a stochastic oscillator in 3D

    Figure 3.  Reconstruction of a working loop

    Table 2.  Efficiencies of the engine along the maximum efficiency working loops

    Point number Extracted mechanical work Heat supply Dissipation $ \eta $
    1 0.1207 0.8319 1.1126 0.1280
    2 0.1991 1.2085 1.5302 0.1462
    3 0.2775 1.5055 1.8331 0.1643
    4 0.3560 1.7363 2.0515 0.1834
    5 0.4344 1.9179 2.2134 0.2031
    6 0.5128 2.0771 2.3471 0.2218
    7 0.5913 2.2568 2.4982 0.2359
    8 0.6697 2.4464 2.6546 0.2470
    9 0.7481 2.6362 2.8082 0.2565
    10 0.8266 2.8185 2.9525 0.2655
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Table 1.  Information from the reachable set of the stochastic oscillator

    Point number distance $ \tilde{\psi}-coordinate $
    1 1.1126 0.1207
    2 1.5302 0.1991
    3 1.8331 0.2775
    4 2.0515 0.356
    5 2.2134 0.4344
    6 2.3471 0.5128
    7 2.4982 0.5913
    8 2.6546 0.6697
    9 2.8082 0.7481
    10 2.9525 0.8266
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
  • [1] A. Agrachev and Y. Sachkov, Control Theory from the Geometric Viewpoint, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-06404-7.
    [2] A. Agrachev, D. Barilari and U. Boscain, Introduction to Riemannian and sub-Riemannian geometry, 2014. Available from: https://webusers.imj-prg.fr/~davide.barilari/ABB-SRnotes-110715.pdf.
    [3] P. Bamberg and  S. SternbergA Course in Mathematics for Students of Physics: 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991. 
    [4] A. M. Bloch, Nonholonomic Mechanics and Control, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2003.
    [5] M. Born, Natural Philosophy of Cause and Chance, Dover, New York, 1964.
    [6] R. W. Brockett, Control Theory and Singular Riemannian Geometry, New Directions in Applied Mathematics (eds. P. J. Hilton and G. S. Young), Springer-Verlag, (1982), New York, 11–27.
    [7] R. W. Brockett, Nonlinear control theory and differential geometry, Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians (eds. Z. Ciesielski and C. Olech), Polish Scientific Publishers, (1984), Warszawa, 1357–1368.
    [8] R. W. Brockett, Control of stochastic ensembles, The Astrom Symposium on Control(eds. B. Wittenmark and A. Rantzer), Studentlitteretur, (1999), Lund, 199–216.
    [9] R. W. Brockett, Thermodynamics with time: Exergy and passivity, Systems and Control Letters, 101 (2017), 44-49.  doi: 10.1016/j.sysconle.2016.06.009.
    [10] R. W. Brockett and J. C. Willems, Stochastic Control and the Second Law of Thermodynamics, Proceedings of the 17th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, IEEE, (1978), New York, 1007–1011. doi: 10.1109/CDC.1978.268083.
    [11] C. Bustamante, J. Liphardt and F. Ritort, The non-equilibrium thermodynamics of small systems, Physics Today, 58, 7, 43 (2005).
    [12] C. Carathéodory, Untersuchungen über die Grundlagen der Thermodynamik, Mathematische Annalen, 67 (1909), 355-386.  doi: 10.1007/BF01450409.
    [13] S. Chandrasekhar, An Introduction to the Study of Stellar Structure, Dover Publications, Inc., New York, N. Y. 1957.
    [14] M. Chen and C. J. Tomlin, Hamilton-Jacobi reachability: Some recent theoretical advances and applications in unmanned airspace management, Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems, 1 (2018), 333-358.  doi: 10.1146/annurev-control-060117-104941.
    [15] W. L. Chow, Über Systeme von linearen partiellen Differentialgleichungen erster Ordnung, Mathematische Annalen, 117 (1939), 98-105.  doi: 10.1007/BF01450011.
    [16] M. P. do Carmo, Riemannian Geometry, Birkhäuser, Boston, 1992.
    [17] M. Gromov, Carnot-Carathéodory spaces seen from within, Sub-Riemannian Geometry, Prog. Math.(eds, A. Bellaiche and J-J. Risler), Birkhäuser, Basel, 144 (1996), 79–323.
    [18] M. Gromov, Metric Structures for Riemannian and Non-Riemannian Spaces, Based on Structures Metriques des Varietes Riemanniennes (eds. J. LaFontaine and P. Pansu), 1981, English Translation by Sean M. Bates, Birkhäuser, Boston.
    [19] R. Hermann, Differential Geometry and the Calculus of Variations, Series: Mathematics in Science and Engineering, 49, Academic Press, New York, 1968.
    [20] C. Jarzynski, Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differences, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997), 2690.
    [21] V. JurdjevicGeometric Control Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1997. 
    [22] D. LiberzonCalculus of Variations and Optimal Control Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford, 2012. 
    [23] J. LiphardtS. DumontS. B. SmithI. Tinoco Jr and C. Bustamante, Equilibrium information from nonequilibrium measurements in an experimental test of Jarzynski's equality, Science, 296 (2002), 1832-1835.  doi: 10.1126/science.1071152.
    [24] I. Mitchell, The flexible, extensible and efficient toolbox of level set methods, Journal of Scientific Computing, 35 (2008), 300-329.  doi: 10.1007/s10915-007-9174-4.
    [25] R. Montgomery, Review of M. Gromov, Carnot-Carathéodory Spaces Seen from Within, Mathematical Reviews, 53C17 (53C23) featured review, 2000, MathSciNet, American Mathematical Society.
    [26] R. Montgomery, A Tour of Subriemannian Geometries, Their Geodesics and Applications, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI., 2002.
    [27] K. C. Neuman and S. M. Block, Optical trapping, Review of Scientific Instruments, 75 (2004), 2787. doi: 10.1063/1.1785844.
    [28] S. Osher and R. Fedkiw, Level Set Methods and Dynamic Implicit Surfaces, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2003. doi: 10.1007/b98879.
    [29] S. Osher, A level set formulation for the solution of the Dirichlet problem for Hamilton-Jacobi equations, SIAM Journal of Mathematical Analysis, 24 (1993), 1145-1152.  doi: 10.1137/0524066.
    [30] B. Øksendal, Stochastic Differential Equations, Fifth edition. Universitext. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-03620-4.
    [31] R. K. Pathria and P. D. Beale, Statistical Mechanics, 3$^{rd}$ edition, Elsevier, Burlington MA, 2011.
    [32] P. K. Rashevskii, About connecting two points of complete non-holonomic space by admissible curve (in Russian), Uch. Zapiski Ped. Inst. Libknexta, 2 (1938), 83-94. 
    [33] D. A. Sivak and G. E. Crooks, Thermodynamic metric and optimal paths, Physical Review Letters, 108 (2012), 190602.  doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.190602.
    [34] J. C. Willems, Dissipative dynamical systems part Ⅰ: General theory, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 45 (1972), 321-351.  doi: 10.1007/BF00276493.
    [35] P. R. Zulkowski, The Geometry of Thermodynamic Control, Ph.D thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 2014.
    [36] P. R. Zulkowski, D. A. Sivak, G. E. Crooks and M. R. DeWeese, Geometry of thermodynamic control, Physical Review E, 86 (2012), 041148. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.86.041148.
    [37] R. ZwanzigNonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics, Oxford University Press, New York, 2001. 
  • 加载中

Figures(3)

Tables(2)

SHARE

Article Metrics

HTML views(2255) PDF downloads(645) Cited by(0)

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return