American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
  • Previous Article
    On sufficiency issues, first integrals and exact solutions of Uzawa-Lucas model with unskilled labor
  • DCDS-S Home
  • This Issue
  • Next Article
    Point to point traveling wave and periodic traveling wave induced by Hopf bifurcation for a diffusive predator-prey system
doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020233

A method how to determine parameters arising in a smoldering evolution equation by image segmentation for experiment's movies

Maika Goto 1, , Kazunori Kuwana 1, , Yasuhide Uegata 2,, and  Shigetoshi Yazaki 3,

1. 

Faculty of Engineering, Yamagata University, 4-3-16 Jonan, Yonezawa-shi, Yamagata 992-8510, Japan
2. 

Graduate School of Science and Technology, Meiji University, 1-1-1 Higashi-Mita, Tama-ku, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa 214-8571, Japan
3. 

School of Science and Technology, Meiji University, 1-1-1 Higashi-Mita, Tama-ku, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa 214-8571, Japan

* Corresponding author. E-mail address : uegata@meiji.ac.jp (Yasuhide Uegata)

Received  January 2019 Revised  October 2019 Published  December 2019

We propose a simple and accurate procedure how to extract the values of model parameters in a flame/smoldering evolution equation from 2D movie images of real experiments. The procedure includes a novel method of image segmentation, which can detect an expanding smoldering front as a plane polygonal curve. The evolution equation is equivalent to the so-called Kuramoto-Sivashinsky (KS) equation in a certain scale. Our results suggest a valid range of parameters in the KS equation as well as the validity of the KS equation itself.

Keywords: Image segmentation, step-function adjusted method, Kuramoto-Sivashinsky, smoldering combustion, image intensity function, evolving Jordan curve.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 35R37, 68U10, 80A25; Secondary: 53C80.
Citation: Maika Goto, Kazunori Kuwana, Yasuhide Uegata, Shigetoshi Yazaki. A method how to determine parameters arising in a smoldering evolution equation by image segmentation for experiment's movies. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020233
References:
[1]

M. Beneš, M. Kimura, P. Pauš, D. Ševčovič, T. Tsujikawa and S. Yazaki, Application of a curvature adjusted method in image segmentation, Bulletin of the Institute of Mathematics, Academia Sinica New Series, 3 (2008), 509-523.   Google Scholar

[2]

C. L. Epstein and M. Gage, The curve shortening flow, Wave Motion: Theory, Modelling, and Computation (Berkeley, Calif., 1986) Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publications, Springer, New York, 7 (1987), 15-59.  doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-9583-6_2.  Google Scholar

[3]

M. L. Frankel and G. I. Sivashinsky, On the nonlinear thermal diffusive theory of curved flames, Journal de Physique, 48 (1987), 25-28.  doi: 10.1051/jphys:0198700480102500.  Google Scholar

[4]

M. Goto, K. Kuwana and S. Yazaki, A simple and fast numerical method for solving flame/smoldering evolution equations, JSIAM Letter, 10 (2018), 49-52.  doi: 10.14495/jsiaml.10.49.  Google Scholar

[5]

M. Goto, K. Kuwana, G. Kushida and S. Yazaki, Experimental and theoretical study on near-floor flame spread along a thin solid, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 37 (2019), 3783-3791.  doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2018.06.001.  Google Scholar

[6]

M. Kass, A. Witkin and D. Terzopulos, Snakes: Active contour models, Int. J. Computer Vision, 1 (1988), 321-331.  doi: 10.1007/BF00133570.  Google Scholar

[7]

Y. Kuramoto and T. Tsuzuki, Persistent propagation of concentration waves in dissipative media far from thermal equilibrium, Progress of Theoretical Physics, 55 (1976), 356-369.  doi: 10.1143/PTP.55.356.  Google Scholar

[8]

K. Mikula and D. Ševčovič, A direct method for solving an anisotropic mean curvature flow of plane curves with an external force, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 27 (2004), 1545-1565.  doi: 10.1002/mma.514.  Google Scholar

[9]

K. Mikula and D. Ševčovič, Computational and qualitative aspects of evolution of curves driven by curvature and external force, Comput. Vis. Sci., 6 (2004), 211-225.  doi: 10.1007/s00791-004-0131-6.  Google Scholar

[10]

D. Ševčovič and S. Yazaki, Evolution of plane curves with a curvature adjusted tangential velocity, Japan J. Indust. Appl. Math., 28 (2011), 413-442.  doi: 10.1007/s13160-011-0046-9.  Google Scholar

[11]

D. Ševčovič and S. Yazaki, On a gradient flow of plane curves minimizing the anisoperimetric ratio, IAENG International J. Appl. Math., 43 (2013), 160-171.   Google Scholar

[12]

G. I. Sivashinsky, Nonlinear analysis of hydrodynamic instability in laminar flames. I. Derivation of basic equations, Acta Astronautica, 4 (1977), 1177-1206.  doi: 10.1016/0094-5765(77)90096-0.  Google Scholar

[13]

N. M. Zaitoun and M. J. Aqel, Survey on image segmentation techniques, Procedia Computer Science, 65 (2015), 797-806.  doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.09.027.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

M. Beneš, M. Kimura, P. Pauš, D. Ševčovič, T. Tsujikawa and S. Yazaki, Application of a curvature adjusted method in image segmentation, Bulletin of the Institute of Mathematics, Academia Sinica New Series, 3 (2008), 509-523.   Google Scholar

[2]

C. L. Epstein and M. Gage, The curve shortening flow, Wave Motion: Theory, Modelling, and Computation (Berkeley, Calif., 1986) Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publications, Springer, New York, 7 (1987), 15-59.  doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-9583-6_2.  Google Scholar

[3]

M. L. Frankel and G. I. Sivashinsky, On the nonlinear thermal diffusive theory of curved flames, Journal de Physique, 48 (1987), 25-28.  doi: 10.1051/jphys:0198700480102500.  Google Scholar

[4]

M. Goto, K. Kuwana and S. Yazaki, A simple and fast numerical method for solving flame/smoldering evolution equations, JSIAM Letter, 10 (2018), 49-52.  doi: 10.14495/jsiaml.10.49.  Google Scholar

[5]

M. Goto, K. Kuwana, G. Kushida and S. Yazaki, Experimental and theoretical study on near-floor flame spread along a thin solid, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 37 (2019), 3783-3791.  doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2018.06.001.  Google Scholar

[6]

M. Kass, A. Witkin and D. Terzopulos, Snakes: Active contour models, Int. J. Computer Vision, 1 (1988), 321-331.  doi: 10.1007/BF00133570.  Google Scholar

[7]

Y. Kuramoto and T. Tsuzuki, Persistent propagation of concentration waves in dissipative media far from thermal equilibrium, Progress of Theoretical Physics, 55 (1976), 356-369.  doi: 10.1143/PTP.55.356.  Google Scholar

[8]

K. Mikula and D. Ševčovič, A direct method for solving an anisotropic mean curvature flow of plane curves with an external force, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 27 (2004), 1545-1565.  doi: 10.1002/mma.514.  Google Scholar

[9]

K. Mikula and D. Ševčovič, Computational and qualitative aspects of evolution of curves driven by curvature and external force, Comput. Vis. Sci., 6 (2004), 211-225.  doi: 10.1007/s00791-004-0131-6.  Google Scholar

[10]

D. Ševčovič and S. Yazaki, Evolution of plane curves with a curvature adjusted tangential velocity, Japan J. Indust. Appl. Math., 28 (2011), 413-442.  doi: 10.1007/s13160-011-0046-9.  Google Scholar

[11]

D. Ševčovič and S. Yazaki, On a gradient flow of plane curves minimizing the anisoperimetric ratio, IAENG International J. Appl. Math., 43 (2013), 160-171.   Google Scholar

[12]

G. I. Sivashinsky, Nonlinear analysis of hydrodynamic instability in laminar flames. I. Derivation of basic equations, Acta Astronautica, 4 (1977), 1177-1206.  doi: 10.1016/0094-5765(77)90096-0.  Google Scholar

[13]

N. M. Zaitoun and M. J. Aqel, Survey on image segmentation techniques, Procedia Computer Science, 65 (2015), 797-806.  doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.09.027.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  The photographs depict snapshots from an experimental movie of spreading flame/smoldering front along a sheet of paper placed near the floor at 200th, 400th, 1000th, 1600th, $ \cdots $, 4000th frames at the rate of 30 fps. Experiments were performed by the same method as [5]
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2.  The left figure depicts numerical solutions to (1), with the normal velocity (2) in which the parameters are given by the right table and $ W $ is chosen for controlling the grid-point spacing to be uniform (see section 3). The solution curves evolve from inside to outside. The initial curve is a circle with the diameter $ R = R_\mathrm{ini} $ with 10% noise (see [4] in detail)
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3.  (a) Jordan curve $ \Gamma $      (b) Jordan polygonal curve $ \mathcal{P} $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4.  The upper-left figure depicts selected segmentation curves at frames: 400, 1000, 1600, 2200, 2800, 3400, 4000, summarizing the front evolution in the other photographs from left to right, upper to lower. The blue curve in each photograph is a segmentation curve, and the background vague region is the same as that in FIGURE 1
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 5.  (Left) The total length of front $ \tilde{L} [\mathrm{mm}] $ vs. the actual time $ [\mathrm{second}] $. (Right) The enclosed area $ \tilde{A} [\mathrm{mm}^2] $ vs. the actual time $ [\mathrm{second}] $. Blue points indicate the actual values and red curves are the graphs of (23) and (24), respectively
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 6.  (Left) $ V^{(0)} $ vs. time, (Right) $ \alpha_\mathrm{eff} $ vs. time
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Table 1.  Discretizations of length, normal/tangent vector, and normal velocity
$ r_i=\|\boldsymbol{x}_i-\boldsymbol{x}_{i-1}\| $ : The length of $ \mathcal{P}_i $
$ L= \sum\limits_{i=1}^Nr_i $ : The total length of $ \mathcal{P} $
$ \boldsymbol{t}_i=(\boldsymbol{x}_i-\boldsymbol{x}_{i-1})/r_i $ : The unit tangent vector on $ \mathcal{P}_i $
$ \boldsymbol{n}_i=-\boldsymbol{t}_i^\bot $ : The outward unit normal vector on $ \mathcal{P}_i $
$ v_i $ : A given representative normal velocity on $ \mathcal{P}_i $
$ \phi_i=\mathrm{sgn}(D_i)\arccos(\boldsymbol{t}_i\cdot\boldsymbol{t}_{i+1}) $ : The angle between the adjacent edges $ \mathcal{P}_{i} $ and $ \mathcal{P}_{i+1} $ where $ D_i=\det(\boldsymbol{t}_i, \boldsymbol{t}_{i+1}) $
$ \boldsymbol{T}_i=(\boldsymbol{t}_i+\boldsymbol{t}_{i+1})/(2\mathsf{cos}_i) $ : The unit tangent vector at $ \boldsymbol{x}_i $ where $ \mathsf{cos}_i=\cos(\phi_i/2)=\|(\boldsymbol{t}_i+\boldsymbol{t}_{i+1})/2\| $
$ \boldsymbol{N}_i=(\boldsymbol{n}_i+\boldsymbol{n}_{i+1})/(2\mathsf{cos}_i) $ : The outward unit normal vector at $ \boldsymbol{x}_i $
$ V_i=(v_i+v_{i+1})/(2\mathsf{cos}_i) $ : The normal velocity at $ \boldsymbol{x}_i $
Table Options

Download as excel

$ r_i=\|\boldsymbol{x}_i-\boldsymbol{x}_{i-1}\| $ : The length of $ \mathcal{P}_i $
$ L= \sum\limits_{i=1}^Nr_i $ : The total length of $ \mathcal{P} $
$ \boldsymbol{t}_i=(\boldsymbol{x}_i-\boldsymbol{x}_{i-1})/r_i $ : The unit tangent vector on $ \mathcal{P}_i $
$ \boldsymbol{n}_i=-\boldsymbol{t}_i^\bot $ : The outward unit normal vector on $ \mathcal{P}_i $
$ v_i $ : A given representative normal velocity on $ \mathcal{P}_i $
$ \phi_i=\mathrm{sgn}(D_i)\arccos(\boldsymbol{t}_i\cdot\boldsymbol{t}_{i+1}) $ : The angle between the adjacent edges $ \mathcal{P}_{i} $ and $ \mathcal{P}_{i+1} $ where $ D_i=\det(\boldsymbol{t}_i, \boldsymbol{t}_{i+1}) $
$ \boldsymbol{T}_i=(\boldsymbol{t}_i+\boldsymbol{t}_{i+1})/(2\mathsf{cos}_i) $ : The unit tangent vector at $ \boldsymbol{x}_i $ where $ \mathsf{cos}_i=\cos(\phi_i/2)=\|(\boldsymbol{t}_i+\boldsymbol{t}_{i+1})/2\| $
$ \boldsymbol{N}_i=(\boldsymbol{n}_i+\boldsymbol{n}_{i+1})/(2\mathsf{cos}_i) $ : The outward unit normal vector at $ \boldsymbol{x}_i $
$ V_i=(v_i+v_{i+1})/(2\mathsf{cos}_i) $ : The normal velocity at $ \boldsymbol{x}_i $
[1]

Kiah Wah Ong. Dynamic transitions of generalized Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (4) : 1225-1236. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016.21.1225
[2]

Yu-Lin Chang, Chin-Yu Yang. Some useful inequalities via trace function method in Euclidean Jordan algebras. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2014, 4 (1) : 39-48. doi: 10.3934/naco.2014.4.39
[3]

Milena Stanislavova, Atanas Stefanov. Effective estimates of the higher Sobolev norms for the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation. Conference Publications, 2009, 2009 (Special) : 729-738. doi: 10.3934/proc.2009.2009.729
[4]

Jared C. Bronski, Razvan C. Fetecau, Thomas N. Gambill. A note on a non-local Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2007, 18 (4) : 701-707. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2007.18.701
[5]

Eduardo Cerpa. Null controllability and stabilization of the linear Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2010, 9 (1) : 91-102. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2010.9.91
[6]

D. Hilhorst, L. A. Peletier, A. I. Rotariu, G. Sivashinsky. Global attractor and inertial sets for a nonlocal Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2004, 10 (1&2) : 557-580. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2004.10.557
[7]

Piotr Zgliczyński. Steady state bifurcations for the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation: A computer assisted proof. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2015, 2 (1) : 95-142. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2015.2.95
[8]

Yuncherl Choi, Jongmin Han, Chun-Hsiung Hsia. Bifurcation analysis of the damped Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation with respect to the period. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2015, 20 (7) : 1933-1957. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2015.20.1933
[9]

L. Dieci, M. S Jolly, Ricardo Rosa, E. S. Van Vleck. Error in approximation of Lyapunov exponents on inertial manifolds: The Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2008, 9 (3&4, May) : 555-580. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2008.9.555
[10]

Peng Gao. Averaging principle for stochastic Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation with a fast oscillation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2018, 38 (11) : 5649-5684. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018247
[11]

Peng Gao. Global exact controllability to the trajectories of the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2020, 9 (1) : 181-191. doi: 10.3934/eect.2020002
[12]

Dominique Zosso, Jing An, James Stevick, Nicholas Takaki, Morgan Weiss, Liane S. Slaughter, Huan H. Cao, Paul S. Weiss, Andrea L. Bertozzi. Image segmentation with dynamic artifacts detection and bias correction. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2017, 11 (3) : 577-600. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2017027
[13]

Matthew S. Keegan, Berta Sandberg, Tony F. Chan. A multiphase logic framework for multichannel image segmentation. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2012, 6 (1) : 95-110. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2012.6.95
[14]

Ye Yuan, Yan Ren, Xiaodong Liu, Jing Wang. Approach to image segmentation based on interval neutrosophic set. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2020, 10 (1) : 1-11. doi: 10.3934/naco.2019028
[15]

Aslihan Demirkaya. The existence of a global attractor for a Kuramoto-Sivashinsky type equation in 2D. Conference Publications, 2009, 2009 (Special) : 198-207. doi: 10.3934/proc.2009.2009.198
[16]

Peng Gao. Null controllability with constraints on the state for the 1-D Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2015, 4 (3) : 281-296. doi: 10.3934/eect.2015.4.281
[17]

Fred C. Pinto. Nonlinear stability and dynamical properties for a Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation in space dimension two. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 1999, 5 (1) : 117-136. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1999.5.117
[18]

Feng Ma, Jiansheng Shu, Yaxiong Li, Jian Wu. The dual step size of the alternating direction method can be larger than 1.618 when one function is strongly convex. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (5) : 0-0. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020016
[19]

M. P. de Oliveira. On 3-graded Lie algebras, Jordan pairs and the canonical kernel function. Electronic Research Announcements, 2003, 9: 142-151.

[20]

Jon Aaronson, Michael Bromberg, Nishant Chandgotia. Rational ergodicity of step function skew products. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2018, 13: 1-42. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2018012

2018 Impact Factor: 0.545

Tools

Article outline

Figures and Tables

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2019 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences