# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

March  2021, 14(3): 1197-1212. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020234

## Stability estimates and a Lagrange-Galerkin scheme for a Navier-Stokes type model of flow in non-homogeneous porous media

 1 Division of Mathematical and Physics Science, Kanazawa University, Kakuma, Kanazawa 920-1192, Japan 2 Faculty of Mathematical and Physics, Kanazawa University, Kakuma, Kanazawa 920-1192, Japan 3 Japan Science and Technology Agency, PRESTO, Kawaguchi 332-0012, Japan

* Corresponding author: Imam Wijaya

Received  January 2019 Revised  May 2019 Published  December 2019

The purposes of this work are to study the $L^{2}$-stability of a Navier-Stokes type model for non-stationary flow in porous media proposed by Hsu and Cheng in 1989 and to develop a Lagrange-Galerkin scheme with the Adams-Bashforth method to solve that model numerically. The stability estimate is obtained thanks to the presence of a nonlinear drag force term in the model which corresponds to the Forchheimer term. We derive the Lagrange-Galerkin scheme by extending the idea of the method of characteristics to overcome the difficulty which comes from the non-homogeneous porosity. Numerical experiments are conducted to investigate the experimental order of convergence of the scheme. For both simple and complex designs of porosities, our numerical simulations exhibit natural flow profiles which well describe the flow in non-homogeneous porous media.

Citation: Imam Wijaya, Hirofumi Notsu. Stability estimates and a Lagrange-Galerkin scheme for a Navier-Stokes type model of flow in non-homogeneous porous media. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (3) : 1197-1212. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020234
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
Representative elementary volume (REV)
The order of convergence for scheme (22)
The boundary conditions and the finite element mesh
Time evolution of velocity magnitude
Computation domain and porosity value distribution
Time evolution of magnitude velocity
The unit of important symbols
 No Symbol Unit Name of the symbol [0.5ex] 1 $u$ ${\rm m} \cdot {\rm s}^{-1}$ Darcy velocity 2 $p$ ${\rm kg} \cdot {\rm m}^{-1}\cdot {\rm s}^{-2}$ Pressure 3 $\phi$ - porosity 4 $k_{D}$ ${\rm kg}^{-1} \cdot {\rm m}^3 \cdot {\rm s}$ Hydraulic conductivity 5 $K$ ${\rm m}^2$ Permeability 6 $\mu$ ${\rm kg} \cdot {\rm m}^{-1}\cdot {\rm s}^{-1}$ Dynamic viscosity 7 $\rho$ ${\rm kg} \cdot {\rm m}^{-3}$ Density 8 $d_{p}$ ${\rm m}$ Particle diameter 9 $F$ - Forchheimer constant 10 $B$ ${\rm kg} \cdot {\rm m}^{-2} \cdot {\rm s}^{-2}$ Drag force per unit volume
 No Symbol Unit Name of the symbol [0.5ex] 1 $u$ ${\rm m} \cdot {\rm s}^{-1}$ Darcy velocity 2 $p$ ${\rm kg} \cdot {\rm m}^{-1}\cdot {\rm s}^{-2}$ Pressure 3 $\phi$ - porosity 4 $k_{D}$ ${\rm kg}^{-1} \cdot {\rm m}^3 \cdot {\rm s}$ Hydraulic conductivity 5 $K$ ${\rm m}^2$ Permeability 6 $\mu$ ${\rm kg} \cdot {\rm m}^{-1}\cdot {\rm s}^{-1}$ Dynamic viscosity 7 $\rho$ ${\rm kg} \cdot {\rm m}^{-3}$ Density 8 $d_{p}$ ${\rm m}$ Particle diameter 9 $F$ - Forchheimer constant 10 $B$ ${\rm kg} \cdot {\rm m}^{-2} \cdot {\rm s}^{-2}$ Drag force per unit volume
Values of $Er1$ and $Er2$, their slopes, and CPU times for the problem in Subsection 6.1 by scheme (22)
 $N$ $Er1$ $Er2$ Slope of $Er1$ Slope of $Er2$ CPU time [s] 4 $3.4\times10^{-1}$ $1.6\times10^{-1}$ $-$ $-$ 1.9 8 $7.1\times10^{-2}$ $5.8\times10^{-3}$ 2.26 4.76 16.4 16 $1.4\times10^{-2}$ $1.2\times10^{-3}$ 2.34 2.30 174.8 32 $3.5\times10^{-3}$ $2.9\times10^{-4}$ 2.00 2.05 577.4 64 $1.0\times10^{-3}$ $6.3\times10^{-5}$ 1.81 2.20 5,953.9 128 $2.8\times10^{-4}$ $1.5\times10^{-5}$ 1.84 2.07 58,150.9
 $N$ $Er1$ $Er2$ Slope of $Er1$ Slope of $Er2$ CPU time [s] 4 $3.4\times10^{-1}$ $1.6\times10^{-1}$ $-$ $-$ 1.9 8 $7.1\times10^{-2}$ $5.8\times10^{-3}$ 2.26 4.76 16.4 16 $1.4\times10^{-2}$ $1.2\times10^{-3}$ 2.34 2.30 174.8 32 $3.5\times10^{-3}$ $2.9\times10^{-4}$ 2.00 2.05 577.4 64 $1.0\times10^{-3}$ $6.3\times10^{-5}$ 1.81 2.20 5,953.9 128 $2.8\times10^{-4}$ $1.5\times10^{-5}$ 1.84 2.07 58,150.9
 [1] Xuhui Peng, Rangrang Zhang. Approximations of stochastic 3D tamed Navier-Stokes equations. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (12) : 5337-5365. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020241 [2] Zhiting Ma. Navier-Stokes limit of globally hyperbolic moment equations. Kinetic & Related Models, 2021, 14 (1) : 175-197. doi: 10.3934/krm.2021001 [3] Zhilei Liang, Jiangyu Shuai. Existence of strong solution for the Cauchy problem of fully compressible Navier-Stokes equations in two dimensions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020348 [4] Stefan Doboszczak, Manil T. Mohan, Sivaguru S. Sritharan. Pontryagin maximum principle for the optimal control of linearized compressible navier-stokes equations with state constraints. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2020  doi: 10.3934/eect.2020110 [5] Xin-Guang Yang, Rong-Nian Wang, Xingjie Yan, Alain Miranville. Dynamics of the 2D Navier-Stokes equations with sublinear operators in Lipschitz-like domains. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020408 [6] Xiaopeng Zhao, Yong Zhou. Well-posedness and decay of solutions to 3D generalized Navier-Stokes equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (2) : 795-813. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020142 [7] Yang Liu. Global existence and exponential decay of strong solutions to the cauchy problem of 3D density-dependent Navier-Stokes equations with vacuum. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (3) : 1291-1303. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020163 [8] Leanne Dong. Random attractors for stochastic Navier-Stokes equation on a 2D rotating sphere with stable Lévy noise. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020352 [9] Eduard Marušić-Paloka, Igor Pažanin. Homogenization and singular perturbation in porous media. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020279 [10] Hyung-Chun Lee. Efficient computations for linear feedback control problems for target velocity matching of Navier-Stokes flows via POD and LSTM-ROM. Electronic Research Archive, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/era.2020128 [11] Cung The Anh, Dang Thi Phuong Thanh, Nguyen Duong Toan. Uniform attractors of 3D Navier-Stokes-Voigt equations with memory and singularly oscillating external forces. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2021, 10 (1) : 1-23. doi: 10.3934/eect.2020039 [12] Andrea Giorgini, Roger Temam, Xuan-Truong Vu. The Navier-Stokes-Cahn-Hilliard equations for mildly compressible binary fluid mixtures. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (1) : 337-366. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020141 [13] Olivier Pironneau, Alexei Lozinski, Alain Perronnet, Frédéric Hecht. Numerical zoom for multiscale problems with an application to flows through porous media. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2009, 23 (1&2) : 265-280. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.23.265 [14] Duy Phan. Approximate controllability for Navier–Stokes equations in $\rm3D$ cylinders under Lions boundary conditions by an explicit saturating set. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2021, 10 (1) : 199-227. doi: 10.3934/eect.2020062 [15] Bin Wang, Lin Mu. Viscosity robust weak Galerkin finite element methods for Stokes problems. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29 (1) : 1881-1895. doi: 10.3934/era.2020096 [16] Zexuan Liu, Zhiyuan Sun, Jerry Zhijian Yang. A numerical study of superconvergence of the discontinuous Galerkin method by patch reconstruction. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (4) : 1487-1501. doi: 10.3934/era.2020078 [17] Yue Feng, Yujie Liu, Ruishu Wang, Shangyou Zhang. A conforming discontinuous Galerkin finite element method on rectangular partitions. Electronic Research Archive, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/era.2020120 [18] Xiu Ye, Shangyou Zhang, Peng Zhu. A weak Galerkin finite element method for nonlinear conservation laws. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29 (1) : 1897-1923. doi: 10.3934/era.2020097 [19] Izumi Takagi, Conghui Zhang. Existence and stability of patterns in a reaction-diffusion-ODE system with hysteresis in non-uniform media. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020400 [20] Jiwei Jia, Young-Ju Lee, Yue Feng, Zichan Wang, Zhongshu Zhao. Hybridized weak Galerkin finite element methods for Brinkman equations. Electronic Research Archive, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/era.2020126

2019 Impact Factor: 1.233