# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

December  2020, 13(12): 3495-3502. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020248

## A quantitative Hopf-type maximum principle for subsolutions of elliptic PDEs

 1 Institute of Mathematics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Śniadeckich 8, 00-656, Warszawa, Poland 2 Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 38A, 20–618 Lublin, Poland

Dedicated to Gisèle Ruiz Goldstein

Received  September 2019 Published  January 2020

Fund Project: T.K. acknowledges the support of the National Science Centre: NCN grant 2016/23/B/ST1/00492.

Suppose that $u(x)$ is a positive subsolution to an elliptic equation in a bounded domain $D$, with the $C^2$ smooth boundary $\partial D$. We prove a quantitative version of the Hopf maximum principle that can be formulated as follows: there exists a constant $\gamma>0$ such that $\partial_{\bf n}u(\tilde x)$ – the outward normal derivative at the maximum point $\tilde x\in \partial D$ (necessary located at $\partial D$, by the strong maximum principle) – satisfies $\partial_{\bf n}u(\tilde x)>\gamma u(\tilde x)$, provided the coefficient $c(x)$ by the zero order term satisfies $\sup_{x\in D}c(x) = -c_*<0$. The constant $\gamma$ depends only on the geometry of $D$, uniform ellipticity bound, $L^\infty$ bounds on the coefficients, and $c_*$. The key tool used is the Feynman–Kac representation of a subsolution to the elliptic equation.

Citation: Tomasz Komorowski, Adam Bobrowski. A quantitative Hopf-type maximum principle for subsolutions of elliptic PDEs. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020, 13 (12) : 3495-3502. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020248
##### References:
 [1] H. Berestycki, L. Nirenberg and S. R. S. Varadhan, The principal eigenvalue and maximum principle for second-order elliptic operators in general domains, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 47 (1994), 47-92.  doi: 10.1002/cpa.3160470105.  Google Scholar [2] D. Gilbarg and N. S. Trudinger, Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order, Classics in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001.  Google Scholar [3] I. Karatzas and S. E. Shreve, Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus, , Second edition. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 113. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-0949-2.  Google Scholar [4] M. H. Protter and H. F. Weinberger, Maximum Principles in Differential Equations, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1967.  Google Scholar [5] D. H. Stroock and S. R. S. Varadhan, Multidimensional Diffusion Processes, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, 233. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1979.  Google Scholar

show all references

##### References:
 [1] H. Berestycki, L. Nirenberg and S. R. S. Varadhan, The principal eigenvalue and maximum principle for second-order elliptic operators in general domains, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 47 (1994), 47-92.  doi: 10.1002/cpa.3160470105.  Google Scholar [2] D. Gilbarg and N. S. Trudinger, Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order, Classics in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001.  Google Scholar [3] I. Karatzas and S. E. Shreve, Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus, , Second edition. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 113. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-0949-2.  Google Scholar [4] M. H. Protter and H. F. Weinberger, Maximum Principles in Differential Equations, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1967.  Google Scholar [5] D. H. Stroock and S. R. S. Varadhan, Multidimensional Diffusion Processes, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, 233. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1979.  Google Scholar
The solid curve $\partial D$ separates $D$ (below) from its complement $D^\complement$ (above). The set $\partial K( x,r/2)\cap K( y,r)$ forms an arc on which the centers of the small dotted circles, representing $\partial K(z,\delta)$, lie.
 [1] Giuseppina Guatteri, Federica Masiero. Stochastic maximum principle for problems with delay with dependence on the past through general measures. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2020  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020048 [2] Stefan Doboszczak, Manil T. Mohan, Sivaguru S. Sritharan. Pontryagin maximum principle for the optimal control of linearized compressible navier-stokes equations with state constraints. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2020  doi: 10.3934/eect.2020110 [3] Marion Darbas, Jérémy Heleine, Stephanie Lohrengel. Numerical resolution by the quasi-reversibility method of a data completion problem for Maxwell's equations. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2020, 14 (6) : 1107-1133. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020056 [4] Shenglan Xie, Maoan Han, Peng Zhu. A posteriori error estimate of weak Galerkin fem for second order elliptic problem with mixed boundary condition. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020340 [5] Bernold Fiedler. Global Hopf bifurcation in networks with fast feedback cycles. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (1) : 177-203. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020344 [6] Fabio Camilli, Giulia Cavagnari, Raul De Maio, Benedetto Piccoli. Superposition principle and schemes for measure differential equations. Kinetic & Related Models, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/krm.2020050 [7] S. Sadeghi, H. Jafari, S. Nemati. Solving fractional Advection-diffusion equation using Genocchi operational matrix based on Atangana-Baleanu derivative. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020435 [8] Susmita Sadhu. Complex oscillatory patterns near singular Hopf bifurcation in a two-timescale ecosystem. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020342 [9] Jun Zhou. Lifespan of solutions to a fourth order parabolic PDE involving the Hessian modeling epitaxial growth. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (12) : 5581-5590. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020252 [10] Mokhtar Bouloudene, Manar A. Alqudah, Fahd Jarad, Yassine Adjabi, Thabet Abdeljawad. Nonlinear singular $p$ -Laplacian boundary value problems in the frame of conformable derivative. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020442 [11] Chao Wang, Qihuai Liu, Zhiguo Wang. Periodic bouncing solutions for Hill's type sub-linear oscillators with obstacles. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2021, 20 (1) : 281-300. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020266 [12] Gervy Marie Angeles, Gilbert Peralta. Energy method for exponential stability of coupled one-dimensional hyperbolic PDE-ODE systems. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2020  doi: 10.3934/eect.2020108 [13] Hua Chen, Yawei Wei. Multiple solutions for nonlinear cone degenerate elliptic equations. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020272 [14] Sihem Guerarra. Maximum and minimum ranks and inertias of the Hermitian parts of the least rank solution of the matrix equation AXB = C. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (1) : 75-86. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020016 [15] Min Chen, Olivier Goubet, Shenghao Li. Mathematical analysis of bump to bucket problem. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (12) : 5567-5580. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020251 [16] Qingfang Wang, Hua Yang. Solutions of nonlocal problem with critical exponent. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (12) : 5591-5608. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020253 [17] João Marcos do Ó, Bruno Ribeiro, Bernhard Ruf. Hamiltonian elliptic systems in dimension two with arbitrary and double exponential growth conditions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (1) : 277-296. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020138 [18] Stefano Bianchini, Paolo Bonicatto. Forward untangling and applications to the uniqueness problem for the continuity equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020384 [19] Yichen Zhang, Meiqiang Feng. A coupled $p$-Laplacian elliptic system: Existence, uniqueness and asymptotic behavior. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (4) : 1419-1438. doi: 10.3934/era.2020075 [20] Zedong Yang, Guotao Wang, Ravi P. Agarwal, Haiyong Xu. Existence and nonexistence of entire positive radial solutions for a class of Schrödinger elliptic systems involving a nonlinear operator. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020436

2019 Impact Factor: 1.233