# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

• Previous Article
Finite-time exponential synchronization of reaction-diffusion delayed complex-dynamical networks
• DCDS-S Home
• This Issue
• Next Article
A Novel Lyapunov functional with application to stability analysis of neutral systems with nonlinear disturbances

## Mathematical model of signal propagation in excitable media

 Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Trojanova 13, Prague, 12000, Czech Republic

* Corresponding author: Michal Beneš

Received  February 2020 Revised  January 2019 Published  June 2020

This article deals with a model of signal propagation in excitable media based on a system of reaction-diffusion equations. Such media have the ability to exhibit a large response in reaction to a small deviation from the rest state. An example of such media is the nerve tissue or the heart tissue. The first part of the article briefly describes the origin and the propagation of the cardiac action potential in the heart. In the second part, the mathematical properties of the model are discussed. Next, the numerical algorithm based on the finite difference method is used to obtain computational studies in both a homogeneous and heterogeneous medium with an emphasis on interactions of the propagating signals with obstacles in the medium.

Citation: Jakub Kantner, Michal Beneš. Mathematical model of signal propagation in excitable media. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020382
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
An example of nullclines for problem (1). The green curve represents cubic function $v_1$ and the dashed red line is the graph of the linear function $v_2$. The values of the parameters are $\varepsilon = 0.008, \alpha = 0.139, \beta = 2.54, g_1 = 20, g_2 = 1.5, \text{ and } g_3 = -5.5$
The time evolution of the component $u_1$ of the solution for the set parameter values and the initial conditions for Example 1. Each subfigure represents one selected time level $t$
The time evolution of the component $u_1$ of the solution for the set parameter values and the initial conditions for Example 2. Each subfigure represents one selected time level $t$. The obstacle is marked in orange in Figures Figures 3a and 3b
The time evolution of the component $u_1$ of the solution for the set parameter values and the initial conditions for Experiment 3. Each subfigure represents one selected time level $t$. The obstacle is marked in orange
The common parameters for all Examples
 Model characteristics $u$ right hand side coefficients $\epsilon = 0.008, \alpha = 0.139 , \beta = 2.54$ $v$ right hand side coefficients $g_1 = 20, g_2 = 1.5, g_3 = -7.5$ Fixed point location $u_1^0 = 0.198598, u_2^0 = -2.352028$ Diffusion coefficients $\qquad D_1 = 8\cdot 10^{-4} \quad \text{ in }\Omega\setminus\Omega_{obs}$ $\qquad D_2 = 4\cdot 10^{-4} \quad \text{ in }\Omega\setminus\Omega_{obs}$ $\qquad D_1 = 0 \quad \text{ in } \Omega_{obs}$ $\qquad D_2 = 0 \quad \text{ in } \Omega_{obs},$ where $\Omega$ is a domain identical with the one in the initial conditions and $\Omega_{obs}$ is an obstacle, further described in Table 4 for each example. Initial state and boundary conditions $\qquad u_{ini, 1} = u_1^0 + \sin \left( \frac{\pi (x-a_x^0)}{b^0_x-a^0_x}\right)\sin \left( \frac{\pi (y-a^0_y)}{b^0_y-a^0_y}\right) \quad \text{ in }\Omega_0$ $\qquad u_{ini, 1} = u_1^0 \quad \text{ in }\Omega\setminus\Omega_0$ $\qquad u_{ini, 2} = u_2^0 \quad \text{ in }\Omega$ $\qquad u_1|_{\partial\Omega} = u_1^0$ $\qquad u_2|_{\partial\Omega} = u_2^0$ $\quad \Omega \ = \left( a_x, b_x\right) \times\left( a_y, b_y\right) \ = \left( 0, 1\right)\times\left( 0, 1\right)$ $\quad$ The parameters for $\Omega_0 = (a_x^0, b_x^0)\times (a_y^0, b_y^0)$ are described in Table 4 for each experiment. Numerical characteristics Total length of simulation $. \dots\dots\dots\dots\dots . \ T$ $15$ Internal time step $. \dots\dots\dots\dots\dots\dots\dots\dots \ \tau$ $6.1\cdot10^{-5}$ Mesh $. \dots\dots\dots\dots\dots\dots\dots\dots\dots\dots\dots\dots \ \omega_h$ $128\times 128$
 Model characteristics $u$ right hand side coefficients $\epsilon = 0.008, \alpha = 0.139 , \beta = 2.54$ $v$ right hand side coefficients $g_1 = 20, g_2 = 1.5, g_3 = -7.5$ Fixed point location $u_1^0 = 0.198598, u_2^0 = -2.352028$ Diffusion coefficients $\qquad D_1 = 8\cdot 10^{-4} \quad \text{ in }\Omega\setminus\Omega_{obs}$ $\qquad D_2 = 4\cdot 10^{-4} \quad \text{ in }\Omega\setminus\Omega_{obs}$ $\qquad D_1 = 0 \quad \text{ in } \Omega_{obs}$ $\qquad D_2 = 0 \quad \text{ in } \Omega_{obs},$ where $\Omega$ is a domain identical with the one in the initial conditions and $\Omega_{obs}$ is an obstacle, further described in Table 4 for each example. Initial state and boundary conditions $\qquad u_{ini, 1} = u_1^0 + \sin \left( \frac{\pi (x-a_x^0)}{b^0_x-a^0_x}\right)\sin \left( \frac{\pi (y-a^0_y)}{b^0_y-a^0_y}\right) \quad \text{ in }\Omega_0$ $\qquad u_{ini, 1} = u_1^0 \quad \text{ in }\Omega\setminus\Omega_0$ $\qquad u_{ini, 2} = u_2^0 \quad \text{ in }\Omega$ $\qquad u_1|_{\partial\Omega} = u_1^0$ $\qquad u_2|_{\partial\Omega} = u_2^0$ $\quad \Omega \ = \left( a_x, b_x\right) \times\left( a_y, b_y\right) \ = \left( 0, 1\right)\times\left( 0, 1\right)$ $\quad$ The parameters for $\Omega_0 = (a_x^0, b_x^0)\times (a_y^0, b_y^0)$ are described in Table 4 for each experiment. Numerical characteristics Total length of simulation $. \dots\dots\dots\dots\dots . \ T$ $15$ Internal time step $. \dots\dots\dots\dots\dots\dots\dots\dots \ \tau$ $6.1\cdot10^{-5}$ Mesh $. \dots\dots\dots\dots\dots\dots\dots\dots\dots\dots\dots\dots \ \omega_h$ $128\times 128$
Table of parameter values in which the Examples differ
 Example $\Omega_{obs}$ $\Omega_0$ 1 no obstacle $(0.02, 0.12)\times(0.02, 0.92)$ 2 triangle obstacle in orange in Figure 3 $(0.1, 0.3)\times(0.3, 0.5)$ 3 triangle obstacle in orange in Figure 4 $(0.1, 0.3)\times(0.3, 0.5)$
 Example $\Omega_{obs}$ $\Omega_0$ 1 no obstacle $(0.02, 0.12)\times(0.02, 0.92)$ 2 triangle obstacle in orange in Figure 3 $(0.1, 0.3)\times(0.3, 0.5)$ 3 triangle obstacle in orange in Figure 4 $(0.1, 0.3)\times(0.3, 0.5)$
Table of the numerical parameters and the maximal $L_1, L_2$ and $L_\infty$ errors at 20 time levels for an excitation in a medium with heterogeneous diffusion. Measured against the reference mesh with spatial step $h = 1.95 \cdot 10^{-3}$
 Mesh time step $L_1$ $L_1$ $L_2$ $L_2$ $L_\infty$ $L_\infty$ $h$ $\tau$ error of $u$ error of $v$ error of $u$ error of $v$ error of $u$ error of $v$ 0.0625 0.001953 0.056240 0.161228 0.108336 0.265209 0.363029 0.779687 0.0313 0.000488 0.021852 0.049984 0.043336 0.094244 0.235573 0.651494 0.0156 0.000122 0.004384 0.008584 0.008694 0.014913 0.053264 0.107053 0.0078 0.000031 0.000884 0.001813 0.001997 0.002953 0.013961 0.021748 0.0039 0.000008 0.000217 0.000472 0.000505 0.000698 0.003454 0.004255
 Mesh time step $L_1$ $L_1$ $L_2$ $L_2$ $L_\infty$ $L_\infty$ $h$ $\tau$ error of $u$ error of $v$ error of $u$ error of $v$ error of $u$ error of $v$ 0.0625 0.001953 0.056240 0.161228 0.108336 0.265209 0.363029 0.779687 0.0313 0.000488 0.021852 0.049984 0.043336 0.094244 0.235573 0.651494 0.0156 0.000122 0.004384 0.008584 0.008694 0.014913 0.053264 0.107053 0.0078 0.000031 0.000884 0.001813 0.001997 0.002953 0.013961 0.021748 0.0039 0.000008 0.000217 0.000472 0.000505 0.000698 0.003454 0.004255
Table of the EOC coefficients for an excitation in a medium with the heterogeneous diffusion
 Mesh Mesh EOC u EOC v EOC $u$ EOC $v$ EOC $u$ EOC $v$ $h_1$ $h_2$ $L_1$ $L_1$ $L_2$ $L_2$ $L_\infty$ $L_\infty$ 0.0625 0.0313 1.363831 1.689564 1.321875 1.492657 0.623911 0.259143 0.0313 0.0156 2.317446 2.541744 2.317474 2.659830 2.144942 2.605427 0.0156 0.0078 2.310130 2.243271 2.122186 2.336317 1.931758 2.299371 0.0078 0.0039 2.026351 1.941520 1.983479 2.080882 2.015062 2.353652
 Mesh Mesh EOC u EOC v EOC $u$ EOC $v$ EOC $u$ EOC $v$ $h_1$ $h_2$ $L_1$ $L_1$ $L_2$ $L_2$ $L_\infty$ $L_\infty$ 0.0625 0.0313 1.363831 1.689564 1.321875 1.492657 0.623911 0.259143 0.0313 0.0156 2.317446 2.541744 2.317474 2.659830 2.144942 2.605427 0.0156 0.0078 2.310130 2.243271 2.122186 2.336317 1.931758 2.299371 0.0078 0.0039 2.026351 1.941520 1.983479 2.080882 2.015062 2.353652
The parameters for the second wave in Example 1 – the functional reentry
 Initial state of the second wave at time $t=3$ $\qquad u_{ini, 1} = u_1^0 + \sin \left( \frac{\pi (x-a^2_x)}{b^2_x-a^2_x}\right)\sin \left( \frac{\pi (y-a^2_y)}{b^2_y-a^2_y}\right) \quad \text{ in }\Omega_2$ $\qquad u_{ini, 2} = u_2^0 \quad \text{ in }\Omega_2$ $\quad \Omega_2 = \left( a^2_x, b^2_x\right)\times\left( a^2_y, b^2_y\right) = \left( 0.3, 0.4\right)\times\left( 0.4, 0.6\right)$
 Initial state of the second wave at time $t=3$ $\qquad u_{ini, 1} = u_1^0 + \sin \left( \frac{\pi (x-a^2_x)}{b^2_x-a^2_x}\right)\sin \left( \frac{\pi (y-a^2_y)}{b^2_y-a^2_y}\right) \quad \text{ in }\Omega_2$ $\qquad u_{ini, 2} = u_2^0 \quad \text{ in }\Omega_2$ $\quad \Omega_2 = \left( a^2_x, b^2_x\right)\times\left( a^2_y, b^2_y\right) = \left( 0.3, 0.4\right)\times\left( 0.4, 0.6\right)$
 [1] Weiwei Liu, Jinliang Wang, Yuming Chen. Threshold dynamics of a delayed nonlocal reaction-diffusion cholera model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020316 [2] H. M. Srivastava, H. I. Abdel-Gawad, Khaled Mohammed Saad. Oscillatory states and patterns formation in a two-cell cubic autocatalytic reaction-diffusion model subjected to the Dirichlet conditions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020433 [3] Lin Shi, Xuemin Wang, Dingshi Li. Limiting behavior of non-autonomous stochastic reaction-diffusion equations with colored noise on unbounded thin domains. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (12) : 5367-5386. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020242 [4] Abdelghafour Atlas, Mostafa Bendahmane, Fahd Karami, Driss Meskine, Omar Oubbih. A nonlinear fractional reaction-diffusion system applied to image denoising and decomposition. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020321 [5] Leilei Wei, Yinnian He. A fully discrete local discontinuous Galerkin method with the generalized numerical flux to solve the tempered fractional reaction-diffusion equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020319 [6] Shao-Xia Qiao, Li-Jun Du. Propagation dynamics of nonlocal dispersal equations with inhomogeneous bistable nonlinearity. Electronic Research Archive, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/era.2020116 [7] Karoline Disser. Global existence and uniqueness for a volume-surface reaction-nonlinear-diffusion system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (1) : 321-330. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020326 [8] Noriyoshi Fukaya. Uniqueness and nondegeneracy of ground states for nonlinear Schrödinger equations with attractive inverse-power potential. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2021, 20 (1) : 121-143. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020260 [9] Serena Dipierro, Benedetta Pellacci, Enrico Valdinoci, Gianmaria Verzini. Time-fractional equations with reaction terms: Fundamental solutions and asymptotics. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (1) : 257-275. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020137 [10] Hai-Feng Huo, Shi-Ke Hu, Hong Xiang. Traveling wave solution for a diffusion SEIR epidemic model with self-protection and treatment. Electronic Research Archive, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/era.2020118 [11] Patrick W. Dondl, Martin Jesenko. Threshold phenomenon for homogenized fronts in random elastic media. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (1) : 353-372. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020329 [12] Hirokazu Ninomiya. Entire solutions of the Allen–Cahn–Nagumo equation in a multi-dimensional space. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (1) : 395-412. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020364 [13] Yu Zhou, Xinfeng Dong, Yongzhuang Wei, Fengrong Zhang. A note on the Signal-to-noise ratio of $(n, m)$-functions. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2020  doi: 10.3934/amc.2020117 [14] Awais Younus, Zoubia Dastgeer, Nudrat Ishaq, Abdul Ghaffar, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Devendra Kumar. On the observability of conformable linear time-invariant control systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020444 [15] Fioralba Cakoni, Pu-Zhao Kow, Jenn-Nan Wang. The interior transmission eigenvalue problem for elastic waves in media with obstacles. Inverse Problems & Imaging, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020075 [16] Jianquan Li, Xin Xie, Dian Zhang, Jia Li, Xiaolin Lin. Qualitative analysis of a simple tumor-immune system with time delay of tumor action. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020341 [17] D. R. Michiel Renger, Johannes Zimmer. Orthogonality of fluxes in general nonlinear reaction networks. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (1) : 205-217. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020346 [18] Dan Zhu, Rosemary A. Renaut, Hongwei Li, Tianyou Liu. Fast non-convex low-rank matrix decomposition for separation of potential field data using minimal memory. Inverse Problems & Imaging, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020076 [19] Kai Yang. Scattering of the focusing energy-critical NLS with inverse square potential in the radial case. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2021, 20 (1) : 77-99. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020258 [20] Pierre-Etienne Druet. A theory of generalised solutions for ideal gas mixtures with Maxwell-Stefan diffusion. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020458

2019 Impact Factor: 1.233