# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

## Solving fractional Advection-diffusion equation using Genocchi operational matrix based on Atangana-Baleanu derivative

 1 Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematical Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran 2 Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of South Africa, UNISA 0003, South Africa 3 Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 110122, Taiwan

* Corresponding author: H. Jafari email: jafari.usern@gmail.com

Received  January 2020 Revised  February 2020 Published  November 2020

In recent years, a new definition of fractional derivative which has a nonlocal and non-singular kernel has been proposed by Atangana and Baleanu. This new definition is called the Atangana-Baleanu derivative. In this paper, we present a new technique to obtain the numerical solution of advection-diffusion equation containing Atangana-Baleanu derivative. For this purpose, we use the operational matrix of fractional integral based on Genocchi polynomials. An error bound is given for the approximation of a bivariate function using Genocchi polynomials. Finally, some examples are given to illustrate the applicability and efficiency of the proposed method.

Citation: S. Sadeghi, H. Jafari, S. Nemati. Solving fractional Advection-diffusion equation using Genocchi operational matrix based on Atangana-Baleanu derivative. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020435
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
(Example 6.1) The exact solution with $\alpha = 1$ and numerical solution with $\alpha = 0.99$
(Example 6.1) The exact and approximate solutions with different values of $\alpha$ and $M = 5$ at $t = 0.5$
(Example 6.2) The exact solution with $\alpha = 1$ and numerical solution with $\alpha = 0.99$
(Example 6.2) The exact and the approximate solutions for $M = 5$ at $t = 0.5$
(Example 6.2) The exact solution with $\alpha = 1$ and numerical solution with $\alpha = 0.99$
(Example 6.3) The exact and approximate solutions for $M = 5$ at $t = 0.5$
Numerical results of the absolute error when $\alpha = 0.99$ and $t = 1$ for Example 6.1
 $x$ M=3 M=6 $0.0$ $4.39878e-3$ $7.19623e-4$ $0.1$ $2.83179e-3$ $6.56846e-4$ $0.2$ $3.61572e-3$ $1.03531e-3$ $0.3$ $1.44208e-3$ $8.15792e-4$ $0.4$ $8.62515e-4$ $2.26231e-4$ $0.5$ $1.46612e-3$ $5.53976e-4$ $0.6$ $2.43959e-4$ $1.33992e-3$ $0.7$ $3.58188e-3$ $1.91911e-3$ $0.8$ $6.64254e-3$ $2.04788e-3$ $0.9$ $6.52617e-3$ $1.47985e-3$ $1.0$ $3.29430e-4$ $6.37627e-5$
 $x$ M=3 M=6 $0.0$ $4.39878e-3$ $7.19623e-4$ $0.1$ $2.83179e-3$ $6.56846e-4$ $0.2$ $3.61572e-3$ $1.03531e-3$ $0.3$ $1.44208e-3$ $8.15792e-4$ $0.4$ $8.62515e-4$ $2.26231e-4$ $0.5$ $1.46612e-3$ $5.53976e-4$ $0.6$ $2.43959e-4$ $1.33992e-3$ $0.7$ $3.58188e-3$ $1.91911e-3$ $0.8$ $6.64254e-3$ $2.04788e-3$ $0.9$ $6.52617e-3$ $1.47985e-3$ $1.0$ $3.29430e-4$ $6.37627e-5$
Numerical results of the absolute error when $\alpha = 0.99$, $t = 1$ for Example 6.2
 $x$ M=3 M=6 $0.0$ $2.08503e-2$ $3.99527e-5$ $0.1$ $1.05799e-2$ $7.02578e-5$ $0.2$ $1.21467e-2$ $2.89318e-5$ $0.3$ $4.94776e-3$ $1.02674e-4$ $0.4$ $2.35280e-4$ $1.53367e-4$ $0.5$ $2.36604e-3$ $1.16798e-4$ $0.6$ $1.08676e-2$ $5.12801e-5$ $0.7$ $2.18851e-2$ $2.11059e-5$ $0.8$ $2.91950e-2$ $3.51774e-7$ $0.9$ $2.49148e-2$ $7.30602e-5$ $1.0$ $3.02368e-8$ $2.05050e-6$
 $x$ M=3 M=6 $0.0$ $2.08503e-2$ $3.99527e-5$ $0.1$ $1.05799e-2$ $7.02578e-5$ $0.2$ $1.21467e-2$ $2.89318e-5$ $0.3$ $4.94776e-3$ $1.02674e-4$ $0.4$ $2.35280e-4$ $1.53367e-4$ $0.5$ $2.36604e-3$ $1.16798e-4$ $0.6$ $1.08676e-2$ $5.12801e-5$ $0.7$ $2.18851e-2$ $2.11059e-5$ $0.8$ $2.91950e-2$ $3.51774e-7$ $0.9$ $2.49148e-2$ $7.30602e-5$ $1.0$ $3.02368e-8$ $2.05050e-6$
Numerical results of the absolute error when $\alpha = 0.98$ and $t = 1$ for Example 6.3
 $x$ M=3 M=6 $0.0$ $9.58422e-3$ $0.00000$ $0.1$ $9.47883e-3$ $1.32252e-3$ $0.2$ $1.1959e-2$ $2.51929e-3$ $0.3$ $7.30440e-3$ $3.47139e-3$ $0.4$ $2.89100e-3$ $4.07656e-3$ $0.5$ $3.24315e-3$ $4.28296e-3$ $0.6$ $9.53273e-3$ $4.07656e-3$ $0.7$ $1.94066e-2$ $3.47139e-3$ $0.8$ $2.71593e-2$ $2.51929e-3$ $0.9$ $2.42335e-2$ $1.32252e-3$ $1.0$ $4.19753e-16$ $4.50522e-17$
 $x$ M=3 M=6 $0.0$ $9.58422e-3$ $0.00000$ $0.1$ $9.47883e-3$ $1.32252e-3$ $0.2$ $1.1959e-2$ $2.51929e-3$ $0.3$ $7.30440e-3$ $3.47139e-3$ $0.4$ $2.89100e-3$ $4.07656e-3$ $0.5$ $3.24315e-3$ $4.28296e-3$ $0.6$ $9.53273e-3$ $4.07656e-3$ $0.7$ $1.94066e-2$ $3.47139e-3$ $0.8$ $2.71593e-2$ $2.51929e-3$ $0.9$ $2.42335e-2$ $1.32252e-3$ $1.0$ $4.19753e-16$ $4.50522e-17$
 [1] Reza Chaharpashlou, Abdon Atangana, Reza Saadati. On the fuzzy stability results for fractional stochastic Volterra integral equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020432 [2] Leilei Wei, Yinnian He. A fully discrete local discontinuous Galerkin method with the generalized numerical flux to solve the tempered fractional reaction-diffusion equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020319 [3] Sihem Guerarra. Maximum and minimum ranks and inertias of the Hermitian parts of the least rank solution of the matrix equation AXB = C. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (1) : 75-86. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020016 [4] Djamel Aaid, Amel Noui, Özen Özer. Piecewise quadratic bounding functions for finding real roots of polynomials. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (1) : 63-73. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020015 [5] Peizhao Yu, Guoshan Zhang, Yi Zhang. Decoupling of cubic polynomial matrix systems. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (1) : 13-26. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020012 [6] Shengxin Zhu, Tongxiang Gu, Xingping Liu. AIMS: Average information matrix splitting. Mathematical Foundations of Computing, 2020, 3 (4) : 301-308. doi: 10.3934/mfc.2020012 [7] Aihua Fan, Jörg Schmeling, Weixiao Shen. $L^\infty$-estimation of generalized Thue-Morse trigonometric polynomials and ergodic maximization. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (1) : 297-327. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020363 [8] Mokhtar Bouloudene, Manar A. Alqudah, Fahd Jarad, Yassine Adjabi, Thabet Abdeljawad. Nonlinear singular $p$ -Laplacian boundary value problems in the frame of conformable derivative. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020442 [9] Weiwei Liu, Jinliang Wang, Yuming Chen. Threshold dynamics of a delayed nonlocal reaction-diffusion cholera model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020316 [10] Abdelghafour Atlas, Mostafa Bendahmane, Fahd Karami, Driss Meskine, Omar Oubbih. A nonlinear fractional reaction-diffusion system applied to image denoising and decomposition. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020321 [11] Pierre-Etienne Druet. A theory of generalised solutions for ideal gas mixtures with Maxwell-Stefan diffusion. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020458 [12] Parikshit Upadhyaya, Elias Jarlebring, Emanuel H. Rubensson. A density matrix approach to the convergence of the self-consistent field iteration. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (1) : 99-115. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020018 [13] H. M. Srivastava, H. I. Abdel-Gawad, Khaled Mohammed Saad. Oscillatory states and patterns formation in a two-cell cubic autocatalytic reaction-diffusion model subjected to the Dirichlet conditions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020433 [14] Lin Shi, Xuemin Wang, Dingshi Li. Limiting behavior of non-autonomous stochastic reaction-diffusion equations with colored noise on unbounded thin domains. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (12) : 5367-5386. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020242 [15] Hai-Feng Huo, Shi-Ke Hu, Hong Xiang. Traveling wave solution for a diffusion SEIR epidemic model with self-protection and treatment. Electronic Research Archive, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/era.2020118 [16] Yuri Fedorov, Božidar Jovanović. Continuous and discrete Neumann systems on Stiefel varieties as matrix generalizations of the Jacobi–Mumford systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020375 [17] Dan Zhu, Rosemary A. Renaut, Hongwei Li, Tianyou Liu. Fast non-convex low-rank matrix decomposition for separation of potential field data using minimal memory. Inverse Problems & Imaging, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020076 [18] Peter Poláčik, Pavol Quittner. Entire and ancient solutions of a supercritical semilinear heat equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (1) : 413-438. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020136 [19] Jianhua Huang, Yanbin Tang, Ming Wang. Singular support of the global attractor for a damped BBM equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020345 [20] Stefano Bianchini, Paolo Bonicatto. Forward untangling and applications to the uniqueness problem for the continuity equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020384

2019 Impact Factor: 1.233

## Tools

Article outline

Figures and Tables