American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
  • Previous Article
    A brief survey on stability and stabilization of impulsive systems with delayed impulses
  • DCDS-S Home
  • This Issue
  • Next Article
    Existence of solutions for fractional instantaneous and non-instantaneous impulsive differential equations with perturbation and Dirichlet boundary value
July  2022, 15(7): 1777-1795. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2022006

Distributionally robust front distribution center inventory optimization with uncertain multi-item orders

Yuli Zhang 1,, , Lin Han 1, and  Xiaotian Zhuang 2,,

1. 

School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
2. 

Department of Intelligent Supply Chain, Beijing Jingdong Zhenshi Information Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100176, China

*Corresponding authors: Yuli Zhang and Xiaotian Zhuang

Received  November 2021 Revised  December 2021 Published  July 2022 Early access  January 2022

As a new retail model, the front distribution center (FDC) has been recognized as an effective instrument for timely order delivery. However, the high customer demand uncertainty, multi-item order pattern, and limited inventory capacity pose a challenging task for FDC managers to determine the optimal inventory level. To this end, this paper proposes a two-stage distributionally robust (DR) FDC inventory model and an efficient row-and-column generation (RCG) algorithm. The proposed DR model uses a Wasserstein distance-based distributional set to describe the uncertain demand and utilizes a robust conditional value at risk decision criterion to mitigate the risk of distribution ambiguity. The proposed RCG is able to solve the complex max-min-max DR model exactly by repeatedly solving relaxed master problems and feasibility subproblems. We show that the optimal solution of the non-convex feasibility subproblem can be obtained by solving two linear programming problems. Numerical experiments based on real-world data highlight the superior out-of-sample performance of the proposed DR model in comparison with an existing benchmark approach and validate the computational efficiency of the proposed algorithm.

Keywords: Distibutionally robust, inventory optimization, conditional value at risk, front distribution center, row-and-column generation.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 58F15, 58F17; Secondary: 53C35.
Citation: Yuli Zhang, Lin Han, Xiaotian Zhuang. Distributionally robust front distribution center inventory optimization with uncertain multi-item orders. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2022, 15 (7) : 1777-1795. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2022006
References:
[1]

J. Acimovic and S. C. Graves, Making better fulfillment decisions on the fly in an online retail environment, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 17 (2015), 34-51.  doi: 10.1287/msom.2014.0505.

[2]

J. Acimovic and S. C. Graves, Mitigating spillover in online retailing via replenishment, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 19 (2017), 419-436. 

[3]

B. Bebitoglu, A. Șen and P. Kaminsky, Multi-location assortment optimization under capacity constraints, Available at SSRN 3249175, 2018. doi: 10.2139/ssrn. 3249175.

[4]

A. Catalán and M. Fisher, Assortment allocation to distribution centers to minimize split customer orders, Available at SSRN 2166687.

[5]

B. Dai, H. Chen, Y. Li, Y. Zhang, X. Wang and Y. Deng, Inventory replenishment planning in a distribution system with safety stock policy and minimum and maximum joint replenishment quantity constraints, In 2019 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management (IESM), (2019), 1–6. doi: 10.1109/IESM45758.2019.8948155.

[6]

L. Deng, W. Bi, H. Liu and K. L. Teo, A multi-stage method for joint pricing and inventory model with promotion constrains, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S, 13 (2020), 1653-1682.  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020097.

[7]

JD. com, https://ir.jd.com/static-files/8bc55c1e-93de-4b87-80f9-f6649375ff2f, 2021.,

[8]

D. K. Nayak, S. S. Routray, S. K. Paikray and H. Dutta, A fuzzy inventory model for weibull deteriorating items under completely backlogged shortages, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S, 14 (2021), 2435-2453.  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020401.

[9]

R. T. Rockafellar and S. Uryasev et al., Optimization of conditional value-at-risk, Stochastic Optimization: Algorithms and Applications, 54 (2001), 411-435.  doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-6594-6_17.

[10]

M. Sion, On general minimax theorems, Pacific J. Math., 8 (1958), 171-176.  doi: 10.2140/pjm.1958.8.171.

[11]

Z. Wang, K. You, S. Song and Y. Zhang, Wasserstein distributionally robust shortest path problem, European J. Oper. Res., 284 (2020), 31-43.  doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.01.009.

[12]

T. Wu, H. Mao, Y. Li and D. Chen, Assortment selection for a frontend warehouse: A robust data-driven approach, In 49th International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering (CIE 2019), (2019), 56–64.

[13]

P. J. Xu, Order Fulfillment in Online Retailing: What Goes Where, PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2005.

[14]

P. J. Xu, R. Allgor and S. C. Graves, Benefits of reevaluating real-time order fulfillment decisions, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 11 (2009), 340-355.  doi: 10.1287/msom.1080.0222.

[15]

B. Zeng and L. Zhao, Solving two-stage robust optimization problems using a column-and-constraint generation method, Oper. Res. Lett., 41 (2013), 457-461.  doi: 10.1016/j.orl.2013.05.003.

[16]

Y. Zhang, Z.-J. M. Shen and S. Song, Exact algorithms for distributionally $\beta$-robust machine scheduling with uncertain processing times, INFORMS J. Comput., 30 (2018), 662-676.  doi: 10.1287/ijoc.2018.0807.

[17]

Y. Zhang, S. Song, Z.-J. M. Shen and C. Wu, Robust shortest path problem with distributional uncertainty, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 19 (2017), 1080-1090. 

[18]

S. Zhu, X. Hu, K. Huang and Y. Yuan, Optimization of product category allocation in multiple warehouses to minimize splitting of online supermarket customer orders, European J. Oper. Res., 290 (2021), 556-571.  doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.08.024.

show all references

References:
[1]

J. Acimovic and S. C. Graves, Making better fulfillment decisions on the fly in an online retail environment, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 17 (2015), 34-51.  doi: 10.1287/msom.2014.0505.

[2]

J. Acimovic and S. C. Graves, Mitigating spillover in online retailing via replenishment, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 19 (2017), 419-436. 

[3]

B. Bebitoglu, A. Șen and P. Kaminsky, Multi-location assortment optimization under capacity constraints, Available at SSRN 3249175, 2018. doi: 10.2139/ssrn. 3249175.

[4]

A. Catalán and M. Fisher, Assortment allocation to distribution centers to minimize split customer orders, Available at SSRN 2166687.

[5]

B. Dai, H. Chen, Y. Li, Y. Zhang, X. Wang and Y. Deng, Inventory replenishment planning in a distribution system with safety stock policy and minimum and maximum joint replenishment quantity constraints, In 2019 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management (IESM), (2019), 1–6. doi: 10.1109/IESM45758.2019.8948155.

[6]

L. Deng, W. Bi, H. Liu and K. L. Teo, A multi-stage method for joint pricing and inventory model with promotion constrains, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S, 13 (2020), 1653-1682.  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020097.

[7]

JD. com, https://ir.jd.com/static-files/8bc55c1e-93de-4b87-80f9-f6649375ff2f, 2021.,

[8]

D. K. Nayak, S. S. Routray, S. K. Paikray and H. Dutta, A fuzzy inventory model for weibull deteriorating items under completely backlogged shortages, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S, 14 (2021), 2435-2453.  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020401.

[9]

R. T. Rockafellar and S. Uryasev et al., Optimization of conditional value-at-risk, Stochastic Optimization: Algorithms and Applications, 54 (2001), 411-435.  doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-6594-6_17.

[10]

M. Sion, On general minimax theorems, Pacific J. Math., 8 (1958), 171-176.  doi: 10.2140/pjm.1958.8.171.

[11]

Z. Wang, K. You, S. Song and Y. Zhang, Wasserstein distributionally robust shortest path problem, European J. Oper. Res., 284 (2020), 31-43.  doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.01.009.

[12]

T. Wu, H. Mao, Y. Li and D. Chen, Assortment selection for a frontend warehouse: A robust data-driven approach, In 49th International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering (CIE 2019), (2019), 56–64.

[13]

P. J. Xu, Order Fulfillment in Online Retailing: What Goes Where, PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2005.

[14]

P. J. Xu, R. Allgor and S. C. Graves, Benefits of reevaluating real-time order fulfillment decisions, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 11 (2009), 340-355.  doi: 10.1287/msom.1080.0222.

[15]

B. Zeng and L. Zhao, Solving two-stage robust optimization problems using a column-and-constraint generation method, Oper. Res. Lett., 41 (2013), 457-461.  doi: 10.1016/j.orl.2013.05.003.

[16]

Y. Zhang, Z.-J. M. Shen and S. Song, Exact algorithms for distributionally $\beta$-robust machine scheduling with uncertain processing times, INFORMS J. Comput., 30 (2018), 662-676.  doi: 10.1287/ijoc.2018.0807.

[17]

Y. Zhang, S. Song, Z.-J. M. Shen and C. Wu, Robust shortest path problem with distributional uncertainty, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 19 (2017), 1080-1090. 

[18]

S. Zhu, X. Hu, K. Huang and Y. Yuan, Optimization of product category allocation in multiple warehouses to minimize splitting of online supermarket customer orders, European J. Oper. Res., 290 (2021), 556-571.  doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.08.024.

Figure 1.  Histogram of random demand for a product over two periods
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2.  Proportion of single-item order and multi-item orders in two FDCs of JD.com
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Table 1.  Notation list
Sets
$ I $ Set of product SKUs. $ I=\{1,\cdots,n\}. $
$ J $ Set of multi-item orders. $ J=\{1,\cdots,m\}. $
Parameters
$ a_{ij} \in Z_+ $ Number of SKU $ i\in I $ contained in order $ j \in J $.
$ p'_{i} \in R_+ $ Net profit for each SKU $ i\in I $.
$ p_{j} \in R_+ $ Net profit for each multi-item order $ j\in J $, i.e., $ p_j=\sum_{i\in I}a_{ij}p'_i $.
$ h'_{i} \in R_+ $ Holding cost for each SKU $ i\in I $.
$ h_{j} \in R_+ $ Holding cost for each multi-item order $ j\in J $, i.e., $ h_j=\sum_{i\in I}a_{ij}h'_i $.
$ c_{i} \in R_+ $ Occupied capacity for each SKU $ i\in I $.
$ C \in R_+ $ Capacity of the FDC.
Random Parameters
$ d_j $ Random demand for the multi-item order $ j\in J $.
Decision Variables and Functions
$ s_i\in R_+ $ First-stage decision; Inventory level for SKU $ i\in I $.
$ y_j\in R_+ $ Second-stage decision; Number of satisfied multi-item order $ j\in J $.
$ g(s,d) $ Second-stage net profit function for given $ s $ and $ d $.
Table Options

Download as excel

Sets
$ I $ Set of product SKUs. $ I=\{1,\cdots,n\}. $
$ J $ Set of multi-item orders. $ J=\{1,\cdots,m\}. $
Parameters
$ a_{ij} \in Z_+ $ Number of SKU $ i\in I $ contained in order $ j \in J $.
$ p'_{i} \in R_+ $ Net profit for each SKU $ i\in I $.
$ p_{j} \in R_+ $ Net profit for each multi-item order $ j\in J $, i.e., $ p_j=\sum_{i\in I}a_{ij}p'_i $.
$ h'_{i} \in R_+ $ Holding cost for each SKU $ i\in I $.
$ h_{j} \in R_+ $ Holding cost for each multi-item order $ j\in J $, i.e., $ h_j=\sum_{i\in I}a_{ij}h'_i $.
$ c_{i} \in R_+ $ Occupied capacity for each SKU $ i\in I $.
$ C \in R_+ $ Capacity of the FDC.
Random Parameters
$ d_j $ Random demand for the multi-item order $ j\in J $.
Decision Variables and Functions
$ s_i\in R_+ $ First-stage decision; Inventory level for SKU $ i\in I $.
$ y_j\in R_+ $ Second-stage decision; Number of satisfied multi-item order $ j\in J $.
$ g(s,d) $ Second-stage net profit function for given $ s $ and $ d $.
Table 2.  Statistical Summary
FDC A FDC B FDC C
Number of orders 2632408 669161 1094012
Number of order types 588994 226448 319329
Number of product SKUs 684 659 684
Table Options

Download as excel

FDC A FDC B FDC C
Number of orders 2632408 669161 1094012
Number of order types 588994 226448 319329
Number of product SKUs 684 659 684
Table 3.  Performance of the proposed DRM in comparison with SM under different $ \alpha $-levels
$ \alpha $ CVaR Mean
DRM SM $ \Delta(\%) $ DRM SM $ \Delta(\%) $
0.85 440033.1 425087.0 3.5 463652.7 451409.4 2.7
0.9 448351.2 429470.7 4.4 465044.1 448640.9 3.7
0.95 456801.3 435469.0 4.9 465726.2 445833.8 4.5
1 465673.0 444738.3 4.7 465673.0 444738.4 4.7
$ \alpha $ Std SL
DRM SM $ \Delta(\%) $ DRM SM $ \Delta(\%) $
0.85 96361.7 100889.8 4.5 0.855 0.831 2.9
0.9 100830.4 106131.3 5.0 0.851 0.819 3.9
0.95 104735.4 109443.4 4.3 0.845 0.811 4.2
1 106993.8 112404.5 4.8 0.841 0.803 4.7
Table Options

Download as excel

$ \alpha $ CVaR Mean
DRM SM $ \Delta(\%) $ DRM SM $ \Delta(\%) $
0.85 440033.1 425087.0 3.5 463652.7 451409.4 2.7
0.9 448351.2 429470.7 4.4 465044.1 448640.9 3.7
0.95 456801.3 435469.0 4.9 465726.2 445833.8 4.5
1 465673.0 444738.3 4.7 465673.0 444738.4 4.7
$ \alpha $ Std SL
DRM SM $ \Delta(\%) $ DRM SM $ \Delta(\%) $
0.85 96361.7 100889.8 4.5 0.855 0.831 2.9
0.9 100830.4 106131.3 5.0 0.851 0.819 3.9
0.95 104735.4 109443.4 4.3 0.845 0.811 4.2
1 106993.8 112404.5 4.8 0.841 0.803 4.7
Table 4.  Performance of the proposed DRM in comparison with SM under different $ C $
$ C $ CVaR Mean
DRM SM $ \Delta(\%) $ DRM SM $ \Delta(\%) $
5000 382737.4 362668.6 5.5 385246.1 369465.5 4.3
6000 416751.5 389990.2 6.9 422162.8 398222.2 6.0
7000 440279.7 409294.0 7.6 447352.9 419146.7 6.7
8000 456801.3 435469.0 4.9 465726.2 445833.8 4.5
9000 468414.9 452002.1 3.6 478903.7 463654.4 3.3
10000 475970.4 463618.8 2.7 488072.9 476586.1 2.4
$ C $ Std SL
DRM SM $ \Delta(\%) $ DRM SM $ \Delta(\%) $
5000 49968.8 78203.2 36.1 0.656 0.632 3.8
6000 74686.2 90576.8 17.5 0.727 0.703 3.4
7000 90135.3 102933.8 12.4 0.792 0.755 4.9
8000 104735.4 109443.4 4.3 0.845 0.811 4.2
9000 116587.0 119930.5 2.8 0.891 0.858 3.8
10000 126971.5 128840.1 1.5 0.928 0.905 2.5
Table Options

Download as excel

$ C $ CVaR Mean
DRM SM $ \Delta(\%) $ DRM SM $ \Delta(\%) $
5000 382737.4 362668.6 5.5 385246.1 369465.5 4.3
6000 416751.5 389990.2 6.9 422162.8 398222.2 6.0
7000 440279.7 409294.0 7.6 447352.9 419146.7 6.7
8000 456801.3 435469.0 4.9 465726.2 445833.8 4.5
9000 468414.9 452002.1 3.6 478903.7 463654.4 3.3
10000 475970.4 463618.8 2.7 488072.9 476586.1 2.4
$ C $ Std SL
DRM SM $ \Delta(\%) $ DRM SM $ \Delta(\%) $
5000 49968.8 78203.2 36.1 0.656 0.632 3.8
6000 74686.2 90576.8 17.5 0.727 0.703 3.4
7000 90135.3 102933.8 12.4 0.792 0.755 4.9
8000 104735.4 109443.4 4.3 0.845 0.811 4.2
9000 116587.0 119930.5 2.8 0.891 0.858 3.8
10000 126971.5 128840.1 1.5 0.928 0.905 2.5
Table 5.  Computational efficiency of the proposed RCG algorithm
$ C $ T(s) $ \mathrm{T_{R}} $(s) $ \mathrm{Iter_{R}} $ Var. Cons. $ \mathrm{T_{F}(s)} $ $ \mathrm{Iter_{F}} $
5000 57.897 32.835 3 66606 36421 22.107 330
6000 67.840 32.131 3 67259 37625 34.127 330
7000 51.998 20.851 2 67259 31003 29.824 220
8000 59.025 20.980 2 67259 31003 36.657 220
9000 66.092 21.044 2 67259 31003 43.591 220
10000 72.998 21.054 2 67259 31003 50.402 220
Average 62.642 24.816 2.33 67150 33010 36.118 256.667
Table Options

Download as excel

$ C $ T(s) $ \mathrm{T_{R}} $(s) $ \mathrm{Iter_{R}} $ Var. Cons. $ \mathrm{T_{F}(s)} $ $ \mathrm{Iter_{F}} $
5000 57.897 32.835 3 66606 36421 22.107 330
6000 67.840 32.131 3 67259 37625 34.127 330
7000 51.998 20.851 2 67259 31003 29.824 220
8000 59.025 20.980 2 67259 31003 36.657 220
9000 66.092 21.044 2 67259 31003 43.591 220
10000 72.998 21.054 2 67259 31003 50.402 220
Average 62.642 24.816 2.33 67150 33010 36.118 256.667
[1]

Reza Lotfi, Yahia Zare Mehrjerdi, Mir Saman Pishvaee, Ahmad Sadeghieh, Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber. A robust optimization model for sustainable and resilient closed-loop supply chain network design considering conditional value at risk. Numerical Algebra, Control and Optimization, 2021, 11 (2) : 221-253. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020023
[2]

Meng Xue, Yun Shi, Hailin Sun. Portfolio optimization with relaxation of stochastic second order dominance constraints via conditional value at risk. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2020, 16 (6) : 2581-2602. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019071
[3]

Han Zhao, Bangdong Sun, Hui Wang, Shiji Song, Yuli Zhang, Liejun Wang. Optimization and coordination in a service-constrained supply chain with the bidirectional option contract under conditional value-at-risk. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2022  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2022021
[4]

Vladimir Gaitsgory, Tanya Tarnopolskaya. Threshold value of the penalty parameter in the minimization of $L_1$-penalized conditional value-at-risk. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2013, 9 (1) : 191-204. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2013.9.191
[5]

Haodong Yu, Jie Sun. Robust stochastic optimization with convex risk measures: A discretized subgradient scheme. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (1) : 81-99. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019100
[6]

Ripeng Huang, Shaojian Qu, Xiaoguang Yang, Zhimin Liu. Multi-stage distributionally robust optimization with risk aversion. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (1) : 233-259. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019109
[7]

K. F. Cedric Yiu, S. Y. Wang, K. L. Mak. Optimal portfolios under a value-at-risk constraint with applications to inventory control in supply chains. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2008, 4 (1) : 81-94. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2008.4.81
[8]

Kegui Chen, Xinyu Wang, Min Huang, Wai-Ki Ching. Compensation plan, pricing and production decisions with inventory-dependent salvage value, and asymmetric risk-averse sales agent. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (4) : 1397-1422. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018013
[9]

Shihan Di, Dong Ma, Peibiao Zhao. $ \alpha $-robust portfolio optimization problem under the distribution uncertainty. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2022  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2022054
[10]

Han Yang, Jia Yue, Nan-jing Huang. Multi-objective robust cross-market mixed portfolio optimization under hierarchical risk integration. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2020, 16 (2) : 759-775. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018177
[11]

Engel John C Dela Vega, Robert J Elliott. Conditional coherent risk measures and regime-switching conic pricing. Probability, Uncertainty and Quantitative Risk, 2021, 6 (4) : 267-300. doi: 10.3934/puqr.2021014
[12]

Émilie Chouzenoux, Henri Gérard, Jean-Christophe Pesquet. General risk measures for robust machine learning. Foundations of Data Science, 2019, 1 (3) : 249-269. doi: 10.3934/fods.2019011
[13]

Chuong Van Nguyen, Phuong Huu Hoang, Hyo-Sung Ahn. Distributed optimization algorithms for game of power generation in smart grid. Numerical Algebra, Control and Optimization, 2019, 9 (3) : 327-348. doi: 10.3934/naco.2019022
[14]

Magdalena Graczyk-Kucharska, Robert Olszewski, Marek Golinski, Malgorzata Spychala, Maciej Szafranski, Gerhard Wilhelm Weber, Marek Miadowicz. Human resources optimization with MARS and ANN: Innovation geolocation model for generation Z. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021149
[15]

Sanjoy Kumar Paul, Ruhul Sarker, Daryl Essam. Managing risk and disruption in production-inventory and supply chain systems: A review. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2016, 12 (3) : 1009-1029. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016.12.1009
[16]

Jingzhen Liu, Lihua Bai, Ka-Fai Cedric Yiu. Optimal investment with a value-at-risk constraint. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2012, 8 (3) : 531-547. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2012.8.531
[17]

Xi Chen, Zongrun Wang, Songhai Deng, Yong Fang. Risk measure optimization: Perceived risk and overconfidence of structured product investors. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2019, 15 (3) : 1473-1492. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018105
[18]

Fengming Lin, Xiaolei Fang, Zheming Gao. Distributionally Robust Optimization: A review on theory and applications. Numerical Algebra, Control and Optimization, 2022, 12 (1) : 159-212. doi: 10.3934/naco.2021057
[19]

Yufei Sun, Grace Aw, Kok Lay Teo, Guanglu Zhou. Portfolio optimization using a new probabilistic risk measure. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2015, 11 (4) : 1275-1283. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2015.11.1275
[20]

Hanyu Gu, Hue Chi Lam, Yakov Zinder. Planning rolling stock maintenance: Optimization of train arrival dates at a maintenance center. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2022, 18 (2) : 747-772. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020177

2021 Impact Factor: 1.865

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (259)
  • HTML views (172)
  • Cited by (0)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2022 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences | Privacy Policy