American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
June  2015, 4(2): 221-232. doi: 10.3934/eect.2015.4.221

Optimal bounded controls problem for bilinear systems

El Hassan Zerrik 1, and  Nihale El Boukhari 1,

1. 

MACS Team, Faculty of Sciences, University Moulay Ismail, Meknes, Morocco, Morocco

Received  April 2014 Revised  September 2014 Published  May 2015

The aim of this paper is to study the optimal control problem for finite dimensional bilinear systems with bounded controls. We characterize an optimal control that minimizes a quadratic cost functional using Pontryagin's minimum principle, we derive sufficient conditions of uniqueness from the fixed point theorem, and we develop an algorithm that allows to compute the optimal control and the associated states. Our approach is applied to a cancer treatment by chemotherapy in order to determine the optimal dose of a killing agent.
Keywords: Bilinear systems, cancer chemotherapy., bounded controls, Pontryagin principle.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 49K15, 49K30; Secondary: 92C5.
Citation: El Hassan Zerrik, Nihale El Boukhari. Optimal bounded controls problem for bilinear systems. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2015, 4 (2) : 221-232. doi: 10.3934/eect.2015.4.221
References:
[1]

Z. Aganovic and Z. Gagic, The successive approximation procedure for finite-time optimal control of bilinear systems,, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 39 (1994), 1932.  doi: 10.1109/9.317128.  Google Scholar

[2]

R. E. Bellman, Dynamic Programming,, Princeton University Press, (1957).   Google Scholar

[3]

R. W. Brockett, Lie theory and control systems defined on spheres,, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 25 (1973), 213.  doi: 10.1137/0125025.  Google Scholar

[4]

L. G. De Pillis and A. Radunskaya, A mathematical tumor model with immune resistance and drug therapy: An optimal control approach,, J. Theoritical Medicine, 3 (2001), 79.   Google Scholar

[5]

H. Hermes, On local and global controllability,, SIAM J. Control Opt., 12 (1974), 252.  doi: 10.1137/0312019.  Google Scholar

[6]

E. Hofer and B. Tibken, An iterative method for the finite-time bilinear quadratic control problem,, J. Optim. Theory Applications, 57 (1988), 411.  doi: 10.1007/BF02346161.  Google Scholar

[7]

V. Jurdjevic, Geometric Control Theory,, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, (1997).   Google Scholar

[8]

R. E. Kalman, The theory of optimal control and the calculus of variations,, in Mathematical Optimization Techniques (ed., (1963), 309.   Google Scholar

[9]

R. E. Kalman, Y. C. Ho and K. S. Narendra, Mathematical description of linear dynamical systems,, SIAM J. Control, 1 (1963), 152.   Google Scholar

[10]

K. Kassara and A. Moustafid, Angiogenesis inhibition and tumor-immune interactions with chemotherapy by a control set-valued method,, Mathematical Biosciences, 231 (2011), 135.  doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2011.02.010.  Google Scholar

[11]

T. Kato, Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators,, Springer-Verlag, (1980).  doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-53393-8.  Google Scholar

[12]

J. Kučera, On accessibility of bilinear systems,, Czechoslovak Math. J., 20 (1970), 160.   Google Scholar

[13]

C. Lobry, Contrôlabilité des systèmes non linéaires,, SIAM J. Control Opt., 8 (1970), 573.   Google Scholar

[14]

R. R. Mohler and R. E. Rink, Multivariable bilinear system control,, in Control Systems (ed., 2 (1966).   Google Scholar

[15]

R. R. Mohler, Bilinear Control Processes,, Academic, (1973).   Google Scholar

[16]

L. S. Pontryagin, V. G. Boltyanskii, R. V. Gamkrelidze and E. F. Mischenko, The Mathematical Theory of Optimal Processes,, Wiley (Inter-science), (1962).   Google Scholar

[17]

H. Ramezanpour, S. Setayeshi, H. Arabalibeik and A. Jajrami, An iterative procedure for optimal control of bilinear systems,, IJICS, 2 (2012), 1.  doi: 10.5121/ijics.2012.2101.  Google Scholar

[18]

H. J. Sussmann and V. Jurdjevic, Controllability of non linear systems,, J. Diff. Equations, 12 (1972), 95.  doi: 10.1016/0022-0396(72)90007-1.  Google Scholar

[19]

A. Swierniak and Z. Duda, Singularity of optimal control in some problems related to optimal chemotherapy,, Math. Comput. Modelling, 19 (1994), 255.  doi: 10.1016/0895-7177(94)90197-X.  Google Scholar

[20]

A. Swierniak, U. Ledzewics and H. Schättler, Optimal control for a class of compartmental models in cancer chemotherapy,, Int. J. Appl. Math. Coput. Sci., 13 (2003), 357.   Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

Z. Aganovic and Z. Gagic, The successive approximation procedure for finite-time optimal control of bilinear systems,, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 39 (1994), 1932.  doi: 10.1109/9.317128.  Google Scholar

[2]

R. E. Bellman, Dynamic Programming,, Princeton University Press, (1957).   Google Scholar

[3]

R. W. Brockett, Lie theory and control systems defined on spheres,, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 25 (1973), 213.  doi: 10.1137/0125025.  Google Scholar

[4]

L. G. De Pillis and A. Radunskaya, A mathematical tumor model with immune resistance and drug therapy: An optimal control approach,, J. Theoritical Medicine, 3 (2001), 79.   Google Scholar

[5]

H. Hermes, On local and global controllability,, SIAM J. Control Opt., 12 (1974), 252.  doi: 10.1137/0312019.  Google Scholar

[6]

E. Hofer and B. Tibken, An iterative method for the finite-time bilinear quadratic control problem,, J. Optim. Theory Applications, 57 (1988), 411.  doi: 10.1007/BF02346161.  Google Scholar

[7]

V. Jurdjevic, Geometric Control Theory,, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, (1997).   Google Scholar

[8]

R. E. Kalman, The theory of optimal control and the calculus of variations,, in Mathematical Optimization Techniques (ed., (1963), 309.   Google Scholar

[9]

R. E. Kalman, Y. C. Ho and K. S. Narendra, Mathematical description of linear dynamical systems,, SIAM J. Control, 1 (1963), 152.   Google Scholar

[10]

K. Kassara and A. Moustafid, Angiogenesis inhibition and tumor-immune interactions with chemotherapy by a control set-valued method,, Mathematical Biosciences, 231 (2011), 135.  doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2011.02.010.  Google Scholar

[11]

T. Kato, Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators,, Springer-Verlag, (1980).  doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-53393-8.  Google Scholar

[12]

J. Kučera, On accessibility of bilinear systems,, Czechoslovak Math. J., 20 (1970), 160.   Google Scholar

[13]

C. Lobry, Contrôlabilité des systèmes non linéaires,, SIAM J. Control Opt., 8 (1970), 573.   Google Scholar

[14]

R. R. Mohler and R. E. Rink, Multivariable bilinear system control,, in Control Systems (ed., 2 (1966).   Google Scholar

[15]

R. R. Mohler, Bilinear Control Processes,, Academic, (1973).   Google Scholar

[16]

L. S. Pontryagin, V. G. Boltyanskii, R. V. Gamkrelidze and E. F. Mischenko, The Mathematical Theory of Optimal Processes,, Wiley (Inter-science), (1962).   Google Scholar

[17]

H. Ramezanpour, S. Setayeshi, H. Arabalibeik and A. Jajrami, An iterative procedure for optimal control of bilinear systems,, IJICS, 2 (2012), 1.  doi: 10.5121/ijics.2012.2101.  Google Scholar

[18]

H. J. Sussmann and V. Jurdjevic, Controllability of non linear systems,, J. Diff. Equations, 12 (1972), 95.  doi: 10.1016/0022-0396(72)90007-1.  Google Scholar

[19]

A. Swierniak and Z. Duda, Singularity of optimal control in some problems related to optimal chemotherapy,, Math. Comput. Modelling, 19 (1994), 255.  doi: 10.1016/0895-7177(94)90197-X.  Google Scholar

[20]

A. Swierniak, U. Ledzewics and H. Schättler, Optimal control for a class of compartmental models in cancer chemotherapy,, Int. J. Appl. Math. Coput. Sci., 13 (2003), 357.   Google Scholar

[1]

Wei Feng, Shuhua Hu, Xin Lu. Optimal controls for a 3-compartment model for cancer chemotherapy with quadratic objective. Conference Publications, 2003, 2003 (Special) : 544-553. doi: 10.3934/proc.2003.2003.544
[2]

Urszula Ledzewicz, Heinz Schättler. The Influence of PK/PD on the Structure of Optimal Controls in Cancer Chemotherapy Models. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2005, 2 (3) : 561-578. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2005.2.561
[3]

Luis A. Fernández, Cecilia Pola. Catalog of the optimal controls in cancer chemotherapy for the Gompertz model depending on PK/PD and the integral constraint. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2014, 19 (6) : 1563-1588. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.1563
[4]

Urszula Ledzewicz, Heinz Schättler. Drug resistance in cancer chemotherapy as an optimal control problem. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2006, 6 (1) : 129-150. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2006.6.129
[5]

Urszula Ledzewicz, Heinz Schättler. Controlling a model for bone marrow dynamics in cancer chemotherapy. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2004, 1 (1) : 95-110. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2004.1.95
[6]

Urszula Ledzewicz, Heinz Schättler, Shuo Wang. On the role of tumor heterogeneity for optimal cancer chemotherapy. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2019, 14 (1) : 131-147. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2019007
[7]

Piotr Bajger, Mariusz Bodzioch, Urszula Foryś. Singularity of controls in a simple model of acquired chemotherapy resistance. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (5) : 2039-2052. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019083
[8]

Guy Barles, Ariela Briani, Emmanuel Trélat. Value function for regional control problems via dynamic programming and Pontryagin maximum principle. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2018, 8 (3&4) : 509-533. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2018021
[9]

Urszula Ledzewicz, Heinz Schättler, Mostafa Reisi Gahrooi, Siamak Mahmoudian Dehkordi. On the MTD paradigm and optimal control for multi-drug cancer chemotherapy. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2013, 10 (3) : 803-819. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.803
[10]

Hsiu-Chuan Wei. Mathematical and numerical analysis of a mathematical model of mixed immunotherapy and chemotherapy of cancer. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (4) : 1279-1295. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016.21.1279
[11]

Shuo Wang, Heinz Schättler. Optimal control of a mathematical model for cancer chemotherapy under tumor heterogeneity. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2016, 13 (6) : 1223-1240. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2016040
[12]

Huaiqiang Yu, Bin Liu. Pontryagin's principle for local solutions of optimal control governed by the 2D Navier-Stokes equations with mixed control-state constraints. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2012, 2 (1) : 61-80. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2012.2.61
[13]

Shanjian Tang. A second-order maximum principle for singular optimal stochastic controls. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 14 (4) : 1581-1599. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.14.1581
[14]

Josep M. Olm, Xavier Ros-Oton. Approximate tracking of periodic references in a class of bilinear systems via stable inversion. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2011, 15 (1) : 197-215. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2011.15.197
[15]

Andrii Mironchenko, Hiroshi Ito. Characterizations of integral input-to-state stability for bilinear systems in infinite dimensions. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2016, 6 (3) : 447-466. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2016011
[16]

Alexis B. Cook, Daniel R. Ziazadeh, Jianfeng Lu, Trachette L. Jackson. An integrated cellular and sub-cellular model of cancer chemotherapy and therapies that target cell survival. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2015, 12 (6) : 1219-1235. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2015.12.1219
[17]

Urszula Ledzewicz, Mozhdeh Sadat Faraji Mosalman, Heinz Schättler. Optimal controls for a mathematical model of tumor-immune interactions under targeted chemotherapy with immune boost. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2013, 18 (4) : 1031-1051. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.1031
[18]

Shuo Wang, Heinz Schättler. Optimal control for cancer chemotherapy under tumor heterogeneity with Michealis-Menten pharmacodynamics. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (5) : 2383-2405. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019100
[19]

Yong He. Switching controls for linear stochastic differential systems. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2019, 0 (0) : 0-0. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020005
[20]

Dejian Chang, Zhen Wu. Stochastic maximum principle for non-zero sum differential games of FBSDEs with impulse controls and its application to finance. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2015, 11 (1) : 27-40. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2015.11.27

2018 Impact Factor: 1.048

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (9)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (1)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2019 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences