• Previous Article
    Conditional regularity for the 3D Navier-Stokes equations in terms of the middle eigenvalue of the strain tensor
  • EECT Home
  • This Issue
  • Next Article
    New results on controllability of fractional evolution systems with order $ \alpha\in (1,2) $
doi: 10.3934/eect.2021003

A canonical model of the one-dimensional dynamical Dirac system with boundary control

1. 

St. Petersburg Department of Steklov Mathematical Institute, Fontanka 27, St. Petersburg, 191023 Russia

2. 

St. Petersburg State University, 7–9 Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034 Russia

 

Received  July 2020 Published  January 2021

Fund Project: The first author is supported by the RFBR grant 20-01 627A and Volkswagen Foundation. The second author is supported by the RFBR grant 19-01-00565A

The one-dimensional Dirac dynamical system
$ \Sigma $
is
$ \begin{align*} & iu_t+i\sigma_{\!_3}\, u_x+Vu = 0, \, \, \, \, x, t>0;\, \, \, u|_{t = 0} = 0, \, \, x>0;\, \, \, \, u_1|_{x = 0} = f, \, \, t>0, \end{align*} $
where
$ \sigma_{\!_3} = \begin{pmatrix}1&0 \\ 0&-1\end{pmatrix} $
is the Pauli matrix;
$ V = \begin{pmatrix}0&p\\ \bar p&0\end{pmatrix} $
with
$ p = p(x) $
is a potential;
$ u = \begin{pmatrix}u_1^f(x, t) \\ u_2^f(x, t)\end{pmatrix} $
is the trajectory in
$ \mathscr H = L_2(\mathbb R_+;\mathbb C^2) $
;
$ f\in\mathscr F = L_2([0, \infty);\mathbb C) $
is a boundary control. System
$ \Sigma $
is not controllable: the total reachable set
$ \mathscr U = {\rm span}_{t>0}\{u^f(\cdot, t)\, |\, \, f\in \mathscr F\} $
is not dense in
$ \mathscr H $
, but contains a controllable part
$ \Sigma_u $
. We construct a dynamical system
$ \Sigma_a $
, which is controllable in
$ L_2(\mathbb R_+;\mathbb C) $
and connected with
$ \Sigma_u $
via a unitary transform. The construction is based on geometrical optics relations: trajectories of
$ \Sigma_a $
are composed of jump amplitudes that arise as a result of projecting in
$ \overline{\mathscr U} $
onto the reachable sets
$ \mathscr U^t = \{u^f(\cdot, t)\, |\, \, f\in \mathscr F\} $
. System
$ \Sigma_a $
, which we call the amplitude model of the original
$ \Sigma $
, has the same input/output correspondence as system
$ \Sigma $
. As such,
$ \Sigma_a $
provides a canonical completely reachable realization of the Dirac system.
Citation: Mikhail I. Belishev, Sergey A. Simonov. A canonical model of the one-dimensional dynamical Dirac system with boundary control. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, doi: 10.3934/eect.2021003
References:
[1]

M. I. Belishev, A unitary invariant of a semi-bounded operator in reconstruction of manifolds, Journal of Operator Theory, 69 (2013), 299-326.  doi: 10.7900/jot.2010oct22.1925.  Google Scholar

[2]

M. I. Belishev, Boundary control method, in Encyclopedia of Applied and Computational Mathematics, (2015), 142–146. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-70529-1_7.  Google Scholar

[3]

M. I. Belishev, Boundary control and tomography of Riemannian manifolds, Russian Mathematical Surveys, 72 (2017), 581-644.  doi: 10.4213/rm9768.  Google Scholar

[4]

M. I. Belishev and V. S. Mikhaylov, Inverse problem for one-dimensional dynamical Dirac system (BC-method), Inverse Problems, 30 (2014), 125013, 1–26. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/30/12/125013.  Google Scholar

[5]

M. I. Belishev and S. A. Simonov, Wave model of the Sturm-Liouville operator on the half-line, St. Petersburg Math. J., 29 (2018), 227-248.  doi: 10.1090/spmj/1491.  Google Scholar

[6]

M. I. Belishev and S. A. Simonov, A wave model of metric spaces, Functional Analysis and Its Applications, 53 (2019), 79-85.  doi: 10.1134/S0016266319020011.  Google Scholar

[7]

M. I. Belishev and S. A. Simonov, A wave model of metric space with measure, Sbornik: Mathematics, 211 (2020), 521-538.   Google Scholar

[8]

M. I. Belishev and S. A. Simonov, On evolutionary first-order dynamical system with boundary control, Zapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov POMI, in Russian, 483 (2019), 41–54.  Google Scholar

[9]

I. C. Gohberg and M. G. Krein, Theory and Applications of Volterra Operators in Hilbert Space, Transl. of Monographs No. 24, Amer. Math. Soc, Providence. Rhode Island, 1970.  Google Scholar

[10]

R. E. Kalman, P. L. Falb and M. A. Arbib, Topics in Mathematical System Theory, New-York: McGraw-Hill, 1969.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

M. I. Belishev, A unitary invariant of a semi-bounded operator in reconstruction of manifolds, Journal of Operator Theory, 69 (2013), 299-326.  doi: 10.7900/jot.2010oct22.1925.  Google Scholar

[2]

M. I. Belishev, Boundary control method, in Encyclopedia of Applied and Computational Mathematics, (2015), 142–146. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-70529-1_7.  Google Scholar

[3]

M. I. Belishev, Boundary control and tomography of Riemannian manifolds, Russian Mathematical Surveys, 72 (2017), 581-644.  doi: 10.4213/rm9768.  Google Scholar

[4]

M. I. Belishev and V. S. Mikhaylov, Inverse problem for one-dimensional dynamical Dirac system (BC-method), Inverse Problems, 30 (2014), 125013, 1–26. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/30/12/125013.  Google Scholar

[5]

M. I. Belishev and S. A. Simonov, Wave model of the Sturm-Liouville operator on the half-line, St. Petersburg Math. J., 29 (2018), 227-248.  doi: 10.1090/spmj/1491.  Google Scholar

[6]

M. I. Belishev and S. A. Simonov, A wave model of metric spaces, Functional Analysis and Its Applications, 53 (2019), 79-85.  doi: 10.1134/S0016266319020011.  Google Scholar

[7]

M. I. Belishev and S. A. Simonov, A wave model of metric space with measure, Sbornik: Mathematics, 211 (2020), 521-538.   Google Scholar

[8]

M. I. Belishev and S. A. Simonov, On evolutionary first-order dynamical system with boundary control, Zapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov POMI, in Russian, 483 (2019), 41–54.  Google Scholar

[9]

I. C. Gohberg and M. G. Krein, Theory and Applications of Volterra Operators in Hilbert Space, Transl. of Monographs No. 24, Amer. Math. Soc, Providence. Rhode Island, 1970.  Google Scholar

[10]

R. E. Kalman, P. L. Falb and M. A. Arbib, Topics in Mathematical System Theory, New-York: McGraw-Hill, 1969.  Google Scholar

[1]

Dugan Nina, Ademir Fernando Pazoto, Lionel Rosier. Controllability of a 1-D tank containing a fluid modeled by a Boussinesq system. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2013, 2 (2) : 379-402. doi: 10.3934/eect.2013.2.379

[2]

Teddy Pichard. A moment closure based on a projection on the boundary of the realizability domain: 1D case. Kinetic & Related Models, 2020, 13 (6) : 1243-1280. doi: 10.3934/krm.2020045

[3]

Yumi Yahagi. Construction of unique mild solution and continuity of solution for the small initial data to 1-D Keller-Segel system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021099

[4]

Elena K. Kostousova. External polyhedral estimates of reachable sets of discrete-time systems with integral bounds on additive terms. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2021  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2021015

[5]

Johannes Kellendonk, Lorenzo Sadun. Conjugacies of model sets. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2017, 37 (7) : 3805-3830. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017161

[6]

Michel Chipot, Mingmin Zhang. On some model problem for the propagation of interacting species in a special environment. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021, 41 (7) : 3141-3161. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020401

[7]

Emma D'Aniello, Saber Elaydi. The structure of $ \omega $-limit sets of asymptotically non-autonomous discrete dynamical systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020, 25 (3) : 903-915. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019195

[8]

Xu Zhang, Xiang Li. Modeling and identification of dynamical system with Genetic Regulation in batch fermentation of glycerol. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2015, 5 (4) : 393-403. doi: 10.3934/naco.2015.5.393

[9]

Serena Brianzoni, Giovanni Campisi. Dynamical analysis of a banking duopoly model with capital regulation and asymmetric costs. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021116

[10]

Maolin Cheng, Yun Liu, Jianuo Li, Bin Liu. Nonlinear Grey Bernoulli model NGBM (1, 1)'s parameter optimisation method and model application. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021054

[11]

Wenmin Gong, Guangcun Lu. On coupled Dirac systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2017, 37 (8) : 4329-4346. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017185

[12]

Christophe Zhang. Internal rapid stabilization of a 1-D linear transport equation with a scalar feedback. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2021  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2021006

[13]

Beixiang Fang, Qin Zhao. Uniqueness of steady 1-D shock solutions in a finite nozzle via vanishing viscosity aguments. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2021066

[14]

Reza Mazrooei-Sebdani, Zahra Yousefi. The coupled 1:2 resonance in a symmetric case and parametric amplification model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (7) : 3737-3765. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020255

[15]

Qiao Liu. Partial regularity and the Minkowski dimension of singular points for suitable weak solutions to the 3D simplified Ericksen–Leslie system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2021041

[16]

Francis Hounkpe, Gregory Seregin. An approximation of forward self-similar solutions to the 3D Navier-Stokes system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2021059

[17]

José Raúl Quintero, Juan Carlos Muñoz Grajales. On the existence and computation of periodic travelling waves for a 2D water wave model. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2018, 17 (2) : 557-578. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2018030

[18]

Shihu Li, Wei Liu, Yingchao Xie. Large deviations for stochastic 3D Leray-$ \alpha $ model with fractional dissipation. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2019, 18 (5) : 2491-2509. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2019113

[19]

Tuan Hiep Pham, Jérôme Laverne, Jean-Jacques Marigo. Stress gradient effects on the nucleation and propagation of cohesive cracks. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2016, 9 (2) : 557-584. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016012

[20]

Michael Schmidt, Emmanuel Trélat. Controllability of couette flows. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2006, 5 (1) : 201-211. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2006.5.201

2019 Impact Factor: 0.953

Article outline

[Back to Top]