Global Kolmogorov tori in the planetary \boldsymbol N-body problem. Announcement of result

Previous Article
A sharp Sobolev-Strichartz estimate for the wave equation
ERA-MS Home
This Volume
Next Article
Fixed frequency eigenfunction immersions and supremum norms of random waves

January 2015, 22: 55-75. doi: 10.3934/era.2015.22.55

Global Kolmogorov tori in the planetary $\boldsymbol N$-body problem. Announcement of result

1.	Dipartimento di Matematica ed Applicazioni "R. Caccioppoli”, Università di Napoli "Federico II”, Monte Sant’Angelo – Via Cinthia I-80126 Napoli

Received June 2014 Revised February 2015 Published August 2015

Abstract
Related Papers

We improve a result in [9] by proving the existence of a positive measure set of $(3n-2)$-dimensional quasi-periodic motions in the spacial, planetary $(1+n)$-body problem away from co-planar, circular motions. We also prove that such quasi-periodic motions reach with continuity corresponding $(2n-1)$-dimensional ones of the planar problem, once the mutual inclinations go to zero (this is related to a speculation in [2]). The main tool is a full reduction of the SO(3)-symmetry, which retains symmetry by reflections and highlights a quasi-integrable structure, with a small remainder, independently of eccentricities and inclinations.

Keywords: Quasi-integrable structures for perturbed super-integrable systems, Deprit's reduction, perihelia reduction, Symmetries, $N$-body problem, Multi-scale KAM Theory., canonical coordinates, Arnold's Theorem on the stability of planetary motions, Jacobi reduction.

Mathematics Subject Classification: 34D10, 34C20, 70E55, 70F10, 70F15, 70F07, 37J10, 37J15, 37J25, 37J35, 37J40, 70K4.

Citation: Gabriella Pinzari. Global Kolmogorov tori in the planetary $\boldsymbol N$-body problem. Announcement of result. Electronic Research Announcements, 2015, 22: 55-75. doi: 10.3934/era.2015.22.55

References:

[1]	K. Abdullah and A. Albouy, On a strange resonance noticed by M. Herman,, \emph{Regul. Chaotic Dyn.}, 6 (2001), 421. doi: 10.1070/RD2001v006n04ABEH000186. Google Scholar
[2]	V. I. Arnol'd, Small denominators and problems of stability of motion in classical and celestial mechanics,, \emph{Russian Math. Surveys}, 18 (1963), 85. doi: 10.1070/RM1963v018n06ABEH001143. Google Scholar
[3]	F. Boigey, Élimination des nœ uds dans le problème newtonien des quatre corps,, \emph{Celestial Mech.}, 27 (1982), 399. doi: 10.1007/BF01228562. Google Scholar
[4]	L. Chierchia, The Planetary N-Body Problem,, \emph{UNESCO Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems}, (2012). Google Scholar
[5]	L. Chierchia and G. Pinzari, Properly-degenerate KAM theory (following V. I. Arnold),, \emph{Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S}, 3 (2010), 545. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2010.3.545. Google Scholar
[6]	L. Chierchia and G. Pinzari, Deprit's reduction of the nodes revised,, \emph{Celestial Mech. Dynam. Astronom.}, 109 (2011), 285. doi: 10.1007/s10569-010-9329-8. Google Scholar
[7]	L. Chierchia and G. Pinzari, Metric stability of the planetary N-body problem,, \emph{Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians}, (2014). Google Scholar
[8]	L. Chierchia and G. Pinzari, Planetary Birkhoff normal forms,, \emph{J. Mod. Dyn.}, 5 (2011), 623. Google Scholar
[9]	L. Chierchia and G. Pinzari, The planetary $N$-body problem: Symplectic foliation, reductions and invariant tori,, \emph{Invent. Math.}, 186 (2011), 1. doi: 10.1007/s00222-011-0313-z. Google Scholar
[10]	A. Deprit, Elimination of the nodes in problems of $n$ bodies,, \emph{Celestial Mech.}, 30 (1983), 181. doi: 10.1007/BF01234305. Google Scholar
[11]	J. Féjoz, Démonstration du 'théorème d'Arnold' sur la stabilité du système planétaire (d'après Herman),, \emph{Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems}, 24 (2004), 1521. doi: 10.1017/S0143385704000410. Google Scholar
[12]	J. Féjoz, On "Arnold's theorem'' on the stability of the solar system,, \emph{Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst.}, 33 (2013), 3555. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.3555. Google Scholar
[13]	J. Féjoz, On action-angle coordinates and the Poincaré coordinates,, \emph{Regul. Chaotic Dyn.}, 18 (2013), 703. doi: 10.1134/S1560354713060105. Google Scholar
[14]	S. Ferrer and C. Osácar, Harrington's Hamiltonian in the stellar problem of three bodies: Reductions, relative equilibria and bifurcations,, \emph{Celestial Mech. Dynam. Astronom.}, 58 (1994), 245. doi: 10.1007/BF00691977. Google Scholar
[15]	R. S. Harrington, The stellar three-body problem,, \emph{Celestial Mech. and Dyn. Astrronom}, 1 (1969), 200. doi: 10.1007/BF01228839. Google Scholar
[16]	M. R. Herman, Torsion du problème planétaire, edited by J. Féjoz, 2009., Available electronically at \url{http://www.college-de-france.fr/media/jean-christophe-yoccoz/UPL61526_FonctionPerturbatrice_2009_02.pdf}., (). Google Scholar
[17]	H. Hofer and E. Zehnder, Symplectic Invariants and Hamiltonian Dynamics,, Modern Birkhäuser Classics, (1994). doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-0104-1. Google Scholar
[18]	C. G. J. Jacobi, Sur l'élimination des noeuds dans le problème des trois corps,, \emph{Astronomische Nachrichten}, 20 (1843), 81. doi: 10.1002/asna.18430200602. Google Scholar
[19]	A. N. Kolmogorov, On conservation of conditionally periodic motions for a small change in Hamilton's function,, \emph{Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR (N. S.)}, 98 (1954), 527. Google Scholar
[20]	J. Laskar and P. Robutel, Stability of the planetary three-body problem. I. Expansion of the planetary Hamiltonian,, \emph{Celestial Mech. Dynam. Astronom.}, 62 (1995), 193. doi: 10.1007/BF00692088. Google Scholar
[21]	M. L. Lidov and S. L. Ziglin, Non-restricted double-averaged three body problem in Hill's case,, \emph{Celestial Mech.}, 13 (1976), 471. doi: 10.1007/BF01229100. Google Scholar
[22]	F. Malige, P. Robutel and J. Laskar, Partial reduction in the $n$-body planetary problem using the angular momentum integral,, \emph{Celestial Mech. Dynam. Astronom.}, 84 (2002), 283. doi: 10.1023/A:1020392219443. Google Scholar
[23]	G. Pinzari, On the Kolmogorov set for many-body problems,, Ph.D thesis, (2009). Google Scholar
[24]	G. Pinzari, Aspects of the planetary Birkhoff normal form,, \emph{Regul. Chaotic Dyn.}, 18 (2013), 860. doi: 10.1134/S1560354713060178. Google Scholar
[25]	G. Pinzari, Perihelia reduction and global Kolmogorov tori in the planetary problem,, \arXiv{1501.04470}., (). Google Scholar
[26]	J. Pöschel, Nekhoroshev estimates for quasi-convex Hamiltonian systems,, \emph{Math. Z.}, 213 (1993), 187. doi: 10.1007/BF03025718. Google Scholar
[27]	R. Radau, Sur une transformation des équations différentielles de la dynamique,, \emph{Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Sup.}, 5 (1868), 311. Google Scholar
[28]	P. Robutel, Stability of the planetary three-body problem. II. KAM theory and existence of quasiperiodic motions,, \emph{Celestial Mech. Dynam. Astronom.}, 62 (1995), 219. doi: 10.1007/BF00692089. Google Scholar
[29]	H. Rüssmann, Invariant tori in non-degenerate nearly integrable Hamiltonian systems,, \emph{Regul. Chaotic Dyn.}, 6 (2001), 119. doi: 10.1070/RD2001v006n02ABEH000169. Google Scholar

show all references

References:

[1]	K. Abdullah and A. Albouy, On a strange resonance noticed by M. Herman,, \emph{Regul. Chaotic Dyn.}, 6 (2001), 421. doi: 10.1070/RD2001v006n04ABEH000186. Google Scholar
[2]	V. I. Arnol'd, Small denominators and problems of stability of motion in classical and celestial mechanics,, \emph{Russian Math. Surveys}, 18 (1963), 85. doi: 10.1070/RM1963v018n06ABEH001143. Google Scholar
[3]	F. Boigey, Élimination des nœ uds dans le problème newtonien des quatre corps,, \emph{Celestial Mech.}, 27 (1982), 399. doi: 10.1007/BF01228562. Google Scholar
[4]	L. Chierchia, The Planetary N-Body Problem,, \emph{UNESCO Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems}, (2012). Google Scholar
[5]	L. Chierchia and G. Pinzari, Properly-degenerate KAM theory (following V. I. Arnold),, \emph{Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S}, 3 (2010), 545. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2010.3.545. Google Scholar
[6]	L. Chierchia and G. Pinzari, Deprit's reduction of the nodes revised,, \emph{Celestial Mech. Dynam. Astronom.}, 109 (2011), 285. doi: 10.1007/s10569-010-9329-8. Google Scholar
[7]	L. Chierchia and G. Pinzari, Metric stability of the planetary N-body problem,, \emph{Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians}, (2014). Google Scholar
[8]	L. Chierchia and G. Pinzari, Planetary Birkhoff normal forms,, \emph{J. Mod. Dyn.}, 5 (2011), 623. Google Scholar
[9]	L. Chierchia and G. Pinzari, The planetary $N$-body problem: Symplectic foliation, reductions and invariant tori,, \emph{Invent. Math.}, 186 (2011), 1. doi: 10.1007/s00222-011-0313-z. Google Scholar
[10]	A. Deprit, Elimination of the nodes in problems of $n$ bodies,, \emph{Celestial Mech.}, 30 (1983), 181. doi: 10.1007/BF01234305. Google Scholar
[11]	J. Féjoz, Démonstration du 'théorème d'Arnold' sur la stabilité du système planétaire (d'après Herman),, \emph{Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems}, 24 (2004), 1521. doi: 10.1017/S0143385704000410. Google Scholar
[12]	J. Féjoz, On "Arnold's theorem'' on the stability of the solar system,, \emph{Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst.}, 33 (2013), 3555. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.3555. Google Scholar
[13]	J. Féjoz, On action-angle coordinates and the Poincaré coordinates,, \emph{Regul. Chaotic Dyn.}, 18 (2013), 703. doi: 10.1134/S1560354713060105. Google Scholar
[14]	S. Ferrer and C. Osácar, Harrington's Hamiltonian in the stellar problem of three bodies: Reductions, relative equilibria and bifurcations,, \emph{Celestial Mech. Dynam. Astronom.}, 58 (1994), 245. doi: 10.1007/BF00691977. Google Scholar
[15]	R. S. Harrington, The stellar three-body problem,, \emph{Celestial Mech. and Dyn. Astrronom}, 1 (1969), 200. doi: 10.1007/BF01228839. Google Scholar
[16]	M. R. Herman, Torsion du problème planétaire, edited by J. Féjoz, 2009., Available electronically at \url{http://www.college-de-france.fr/media/jean-christophe-yoccoz/UPL61526_FonctionPerturbatrice_2009_02.pdf}., (). Google Scholar
[17]	H. Hofer and E. Zehnder, Symplectic Invariants and Hamiltonian Dynamics,, Modern Birkhäuser Classics, (1994). doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-0104-1. Google Scholar
[18]	C. G. J. Jacobi, Sur l'élimination des noeuds dans le problème des trois corps,, \emph{Astronomische Nachrichten}, 20 (1843), 81. doi: 10.1002/asna.18430200602. Google Scholar
[19]	A. N. Kolmogorov, On conservation of conditionally periodic motions for a small change in Hamilton's function,, \emph{Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR (N. S.)}, 98 (1954), 527. Google Scholar
[20]	J. Laskar and P. Robutel, Stability of the planetary three-body problem. I. Expansion of the planetary Hamiltonian,, \emph{Celestial Mech. Dynam. Astronom.}, 62 (1995), 193. doi: 10.1007/BF00692088. Google Scholar
[21]	M. L. Lidov and S. L. Ziglin, Non-restricted double-averaged three body problem in Hill's case,, \emph{Celestial Mech.}, 13 (1976), 471. doi: 10.1007/BF01229100. Google Scholar
[22]	F. Malige, P. Robutel and J. Laskar, Partial reduction in the $n$-body planetary problem using the angular momentum integral,, \emph{Celestial Mech. Dynam. Astronom.}, 84 (2002), 283. doi: 10.1023/A:1020392219443. Google Scholar
[23]	G. Pinzari, On the Kolmogorov set for many-body problems,, Ph.D thesis, (2009). Google Scholar
[24]	G. Pinzari, Aspects of the planetary Birkhoff normal form,, \emph{Regul. Chaotic Dyn.}, 18 (2013), 860. doi: 10.1134/S1560354713060178. Google Scholar
[25]	G. Pinzari, Perihelia reduction and global Kolmogorov tori in the planetary problem,, \arXiv{1501.04470}., (). Google Scholar
[26]	J. Pöschel, Nekhoroshev estimates for quasi-convex Hamiltonian systems,, \emph{Math. Z.}, 213 (1993), 187. doi: 10.1007/BF03025718. Google Scholar
[27]	R. Radau, Sur une transformation des équations différentielles de la dynamique,, \emph{Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Sup.}, 5 (1868), 311. Google Scholar
[28]	P. Robutel, Stability of the planetary three-body problem. II. KAM theory and existence of quasiperiodic motions,, \emph{Celestial Mech. Dynam. Astronom.}, 62 (1995), 219. doi: 10.1007/BF00692089. Google Scholar
[29]	H. Rüssmann, Invariant tori in non-degenerate nearly integrable Hamiltonian systems,, \emph{Regul. Chaotic Dyn.}, 6 (2001), 119. doi: 10.1070/RD2001v006n02ABEH000169. Google Scholar

[1]	Claude Froeschlé, Massimiliano Guzzo, Elena Lega. First numerical evidence of global Arnold diffusion in quasi-integrable systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2005, 5 (3) : 687-698. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2005.5.687
[2]	Rentsen Enkhbat, Evgeniya A. Finkelstein, Anton S. Anikin, Alexandr Yu. Gornov. Global optimization reduction of generalized Malfatti's problem. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2017, 7 (2) : 211-221. doi: 10.3934/naco.2017015
[3]	David Blázquez-Sanz, Juan J. Morales-Ruiz. Lie's reduction method and differential Galois theory in the complex analytic context. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2012, 32 (2) : 353-379. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.353
[4]	Andrejs Reinfelds, Klara Janglajew. Reduction principle in the theory of stability of difference equations. Conference Publications, 2007, 2007 (Special) : 864-874. doi: 10.3934/proc.2007.2007.864
[5]	Jacques Féjoz. On "Arnold's theorem" on the stability of the solar system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2013, 33 (8) : 3555-3565. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.3555
[6]	Alicia Cordero, José Martínez Alfaro, Pura Vindel. Bott integrable Hamiltonian systems on $S^{2}\times S^{1}$. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2008, 22 (3) : 587-604. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2008.22.587
[7]	Parker Childs, James P. Keener. Slow manifold reduction of a stochastic chemical reaction: Exploring Keizer's paradox. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2012, 17 (6) : 1775-1794. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2012.17.1775
[8]	C. D. Ahlbrandt, A. C. Peterson. A general reduction of order theorem for discrete linear symplectic systems. Conference Publications, 1998, 1998 (Special) : 7-18. doi: 10.3934/proc.1998.1998.7
[9]	Ernest Fontich, Pau Martín. Arnold diffusion in perturbations of analytic integrable Hamiltonian systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2001, 7 (1) : 61-84. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2001.7.61
[10]	Henrique Bursztyn, Alejandro Cabrera. Symmetries and reduction of multiplicative 2-forms. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2012, 4 (2) : 111-127. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2012.4.111
[11]	María Barbero-Liñán, Manuel de León, David Martín de Diego, Juan C. Marrero, Miguel C. Muñoz-Lecanda. Kinematic reduction and the Hamilton-Jacobi equation. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2012, 4 (3) : 207-237. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2012.4.207
[12]	Fuzhong Cong, Jialin Hong, Hongtian Li. Quasi-effective stability for nearly integrable Hamiltonian systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (1) : 67-80. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016.21.67
[13]	Wen-ming He, Jun-zhi Cui. The estimate of the multi-scale homogenization method for Green's function on Sobolev space $W^{1,q}(\Omega)$. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2012, 11 (2) : 501-516. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2012.11.501
[14]	Álvaro Pelayo, San Vű Ngọc. First steps in symplectic and spectral theory of integrable systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2012, 32 (10) : 3325-3377. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.3325
[15]	Sergio Grillo, Marcela Zuccalli. Variational reduction of Lagrangian systems with general constraints. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2012, 4 (1) : 49-88. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2012.4.49
[16]	Javier Fernández, Cora Tori, Marcela Zuccalli. Lagrangian reduction of discrete mechanical systems by stages. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2016, 8 (1) : 35-70. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2016.8.35
[17]	Javier Fernández, Cora Tori, Marcela Zuccalli. Lagrangian reduction of nonholonomic discrete mechanical systems. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2010, 2 (1) : 69-111. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2010.2.69
[18]	E. García-Toraño Andrés, Bavo Langerock, Frans Cantrijn. Aspects of reduction and transformation of Lagrangian systems with symmetry. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2014, 6 (1) : 1-23. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2014.6.1
[19]	Mike Crampin, Tom Mestdag. Reduction of invariant constrained systems using anholonomic frames. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2011, 3 (1) : 23-40. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2011.3.23
[20]	Nikolai Dokuchaev. Dimension reduction and Mutual Fund Theorem in maximin setting for bond market. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2011, 16 (4) : 1039-1053. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2011.16.1039

2018 Impact Factor: 0.263

American Institute of Mathematical Sciences