American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
  2018, 25: 8-15. doi: 10.3934/era.2018.25.002

Hyperbolic dynamics of discrete dynamical systems on pseudo-riemannian manifolds

Mohammadreza Molaei

Mahani Mathematical Research Center, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

We express our thanks to anonymous referee for his/her valuable comments

Received  July 21, 2017 Published  April 2018

We consider a discrete dynamical system on a pseudo-Riemannian manifold and we determine the concept of a hyperbolic set for it. We insert a condition in the definition of a hyperbolic set which implies to the unique decomposition of a part of tangent space (at each point of this set) to two unstable and stable subspaces with exponentially increasing and exponentially decreasing dynamics on them. We prove the continuity of this decomposition via the metric created by a torsion-free pseudo-Riemannian connection. We present a global attractor for a diffeomorphism on an open submanifold of the hyperbolic space $H^2(1)$ which is not a hyperbolic set for it.

Keywords: hyperbolic set, pseudo-Riemannian manifold.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 37D05; Secondary: 53B30.
Citation: Mohammadreza Molaei. Hyperbolic dynamics of discrete dynamical systems on pseudo-riemannian manifolds. Electronic Research Announcements, 2018, 25: 8-15. doi: 10.3934/era.2018.25.002
References:
[1]

V. M. Alekseev and M. Yakobson, Symbolic dynamics and hyperbolic dynamical systems, Phys. Rep., 75 (1981), 287-325.  doi: 10.1016/0370-1573(81)90186-1.  Google Scholar

[2]

V. Araujo and M. Viana, Hyperbolic dynamical systems, in Mathematics of Complexity and Dynamical Systems, Vols. 13, Springer, New York, 2012, 740-754.  Google Scholar

[3]

C. Bona and J. Massó, Hyperbolic evolution system for numerical relativity, Phys. Rev. Lett., 68 (1992), 1097-1099.  doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.1097.  Google Scholar

[4]

Y. Choquet-Bruhat and T. Ruggeri, Hyperbolicity of the 3+1 system of Einstein equations, Commun. Math. Phys., 89 (1983), 269-275.  doi: 10.1007/BF01211832.  Google Scholar

[5]

A. Gogolev, Bootstrap for local rigidity of Anosov automorphisms on the 3-torus, Commun. Math. Phys., 352 (2017), 439-455.  doi: 10.1007/s00220-017-2863-4.  Google Scholar

[6]

J. S. Hadamard, Sur l'it$\acute{e}ration$ et les solutions asymptotiques des équations différentielles, Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de France, 29 (1901), 224-228.   Google Scholar

[7]

B. Hasselblatt, Hyperbolic dynamical systems, in Handbook of Dynamical Systems, Vol. 1A, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2002, 239-319. doi: 10.1016/S1874-575X(02)80005-4.  Google Scholar

[8]

S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis, The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, No. 1, Cambridge University Press, London-New York, 1973.  Google Scholar

[9]

A. Mukherjee, Differential Topology, Springer International Publishing AG Switzerland, 2015 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-19045-7.  Google Scholar

[10] J. Palis Jr and W. de Melo, Geometric Theory of Dynamical Systems. An Introduction, Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin, 1982.   Google Scholar
[11]

J. Palis and F. Takens, Hyperbolicity and Sensitive Chaotic Dynamics at Homoclinic Bifurcations. Fractal Dimensions and Infinitely Many Attractors, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 35, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993.  Google Scholar

[12]

H. Poincaré, Sur le probléme des trois corps et les equations de la dynamique, Acta Mathematica, 13 (1890), 1-270.   Google Scholar

[13]

C. Ragazzo and L. S. Ruiz, Dynamics of an isolated, viscoelastic, self-gravitating body, Celestial Mech. Dynam. Astronom., 122 (2015), 303-332.  doi: 10.1007/s10569-015-9620-9.  Google Scholar

[14]

S. Smale, Differentiable dynamical systems, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 73 (1967), 747-817.  doi: 10.1090/S0002-9904-1967-11798-1.  Google Scholar

[15]

R. Yang and J. Qi, Dynamics of generalized tachyon field, Eur. Phys. J. C, 72 (2012), 2095.  doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-2095-x.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

V. M. Alekseev and M. Yakobson, Symbolic dynamics and hyperbolic dynamical systems, Phys. Rep., 75 (1981), 287-325.  doi: 10.1016/0370-1573(81)90186-1.  Google Scholar

[2]

V. Araujo and M. Viana, Hyperbolic dynamical systems, in Mathematics of Complexity and Dynamical Systems, Vols. 13, Springer, New York, 2012, 740-754.  Google Scholar

[3]

C. Bona and J. Massó, Hyperbolic evolution system for numerical relativity, Phys. Rev. Lett., 68 (1992), 1097-1099.  doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.1097.  Google Scholar

[4]

Y. Choquet-Bruhat and T. Ruggeri, Hyperbolicity of the 3+1 system of Einstein equations, Commun. Math. Phys., 89 (1983), 269-275.  doi: 10.1007/BF01211832.  Google Scholar

[5]

A. Gogolev, Bootstrap for local rigidity of Anosov automorphisms on the 3-torus, Commun. Math. Phys., 352 (2017), 439-455.  doi: 10.1007/s00220-017-2863-4.  Google Scholar

[6]

J. S. Hadamard, Sur l'it$\acute{e}ration$ et les solutions asymptotiques des équations différentielles, Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de France, 29 (1901), 224-228.   Google Scholar

[7]

B. Hasselblatt, Hyperbolic dynamical systems, in Handbook of Dynamical Systems, Vol. 1A, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2002, 239-319. doi: 10.1016/S1874-575X(02)80005-4.  Google Scholar

[8]

S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis, The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, No. 1, Cambridge University Press, London-New York, 1973.  Google Scholar

[9]

A. Mukherjee, Differential Topology, Springer International Publishing AG Switzerland, 2015 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-19045-7.  Google Scholar

[10] J. Palis Jr and W. de Melo, Geometric Theory of Dynamical Systems. An Introduction, Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin, 1982.   Google Scholar
[11]

J. Palis and F. Takens, Hyperbolicity and Sensitive Chaotic Dynamics at Homoclinic Bifurcations. Fractal Dimensions and Infinitely Many Attractors, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 35, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993.  Google Scholar

[12]

H. Poincaré, Sur le probléme des trois corps et les equations de la dynamique, Acta Mathematica, 13 (1890), 1-270.   Google Scholar

[13]

C. Ragazzo and L. S. Ruiz, Dynamics of an isolated, viscoelastic, self-gravitating body, Celestial Mech. Dynam. Astronom., 122 (2015), 303-332.  doi: 10.1007/s10569-015-9620-9.  Google Scholar

[14]

S. Smale, Differentiable dynamical systems, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 73 (1967), 747-817.  doi: 10.1090/S0002-9904-1967-11798-1.  Google Scholar

[15]

R. Yang and J. Qi, Dynamics of generalized tachyon field, Eur. Phys. J. C, 72 (2012), 2095.  doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-2095-x.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  The hyperbolic space $H^2(1)$
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2.  The black circle $C$ is a global attractor for $h$ but it is not a hyperbolic set for it
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

[1]

David M. A. Stuart. Solitons on pseudo-Riemannian manifolds: stability and motion. Electronic Research Announcements, 2000, 6: 75-89.

[2]

Alexander Nabutovsky and Regina Rotman. Lengths of geodesics between two points on a Riemannian manifold. Electronic Research Announcements, 2007, 13: 13-20.

[3]

Aylin Aydoğdu, Sean T. McQuade, Nastassia Pouradier Duteil. Opinion Dynamics on a General Compact Riemannian Manifold. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2017, 12 (3) : 489-523. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2017021
[4]

Saikat Mazumdar. Struwe's decomposition for a polyharmonic operator on a compact Riemannian manifold with or without boundary. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2017, 16 (1) : 311-330. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2017015
[5]

Shengbing Deng, Zied Khemiri, Fethi Mahmoudi. On spike solutions for a singularly perturbed problem in a compact riemannian manifold. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2018, 17 (5) : 2063-2084. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2018098
[6]

Erwann Delay, Pieralberto Sicbaldi. Extremal domains for the first eigenvalue in a general compact Riemannian manifold. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2015, 35 (12) : 5799-5825. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.5799
[7]

Anna Maria Candela, J.L. Flores, M. Sánchez. A quadratic Bolza-type problem in a non-complete Riemannian manifold. Conference Publications, 2003, 2003 (Special) : 173-181. doi: 10.3934/proc.2003.2003.173
[8]

Zheng Yin, Ercai Chen. Conditional variational principle for the irregular set in some nonuniformly hyperbolic systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2016, 36 (11) : 6581-6597. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016085
[9]

Erchuan Zhang, Lyle Noakes. Riemannian cubics and elastica in the manifold $ \operatorname{SPD}(n) $ of all $ n\times n $ symmetric positive-definite matrices. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2019, 11 (2) : 277-299. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2019015
[10]

E. Camouzis, H. Kollias, I. Leventides. Stable manifold market sequences. Journal of Dynamics & Games, 2018, 5 (2) : 165-185. doi: 10.3934/jdg.2018010
[11]

Camillo De Lellis, Emanuele Spadaro. Center manifold: A case study. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2011, 31 (4) : 1249-1272. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.31.1249
[12]

Zhiguo Feng, Ka-Fai Cedric Yiu. Manifold relaxations for integer programming. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2014, 10 (2) : 557-566. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2014.10.557
[13]

Lan Wen. On the preperiodic set. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2000, 6 (1) : 237-241. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2000.6.237
[14]

Franz W. Kamber and Peter W. Michor. The flow completion of a manifold with vector field. Electronic Research Announcements, 2000, 6: 95-97.

[15]

Claudia Valls. The Boussinesq system:dynamics on the center manifold. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2005, 4 (4) : 839-860. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2005.4.839
[16]

Eric Bedford, Serge Cantat, Kyounghee Kim. Pseudo-automorphisms with no invariant foliation. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2014, 8 (2) : 221-250. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2014.8.221
[17]

YanYan Li, Tonia Ricciardi. A sharp Sobolev inequality on Riemannian manifolds. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2003, 2 (1) : 1-31. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2003.2.1
[18]

Razvan C. Fetecau, Beril Zhang. Self-organization on Riemannian manifolds. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2019, 11 (3) : 397-426. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2019020
[19]

James W. Cannon, Mark H. Meilstrup, Andreas Zastrow. The period set of a map from the Cantor set to itself. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2013, 33 (7) : 2667-2679. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.2667
[20]

M. Phani Sudheer, Ravi S. Nanjundiah, A. S. Vasudeva Murthy. Revisiting the slow manifold of the Lorenz-Krishnamurthy quintet. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2006, 6 (6) : 1403-1416. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2006.6.1403

2018 Impact Factor: 0.263

Tools

Article outline

Figures and Tables

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2019 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences