Classification and simulation of chaotic behaviour of the solutions of a mixed nonlinear Schrödinger system

Previous Article
Global stability of traveling waves for a spatially discrete diffusion system with time delay
ERA Home
This Issue
Next Article
Note on coisotropic Floer homology and leafwise fixed points

September 2021, 29(4): 2561-2597. doi: 10.3934/era.2021002

Classification and simulation of chaotic behaviour of the solutions of a mixed nonlinear Schrödinger system

Riadh Chteoui ^1,2, , Abdulrahman F. Aljohani ^3, and Anouar Ben Mabrouk ^2,4,5,,

1.	Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Tabuk, Saudi Arabia, Lab. of Algebra, Number Theory and Nonlinear Analysis, Department of Mathematics
2.	Faculty of Sciences, University of Monastir, 5000 Monastir, Tunisia
3.	Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
4.	Department of Mathematics, Higher Institute of Applied Mathematics and Computer, Science, University of Kairouan, Street of Assad Ibn Alfourat, 3100 Kairouan, Tunisia, Lab. of Algebra, Number Theory and Nonlinear Analysis, Department of Mathematics
5.	Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Tabuk, Saudi Arabia

^* Corresponding author: Anouar Ben Mabrouk

Received August 2020 Revised November 2020 Published September 2021 Early access January 2021

In this paper, we study a couple of NLS equations characterized by mixed cubic and super-linear sub-cubic power laws. Classification as well as existence and uniqueness of the steady state solutions have been investigated. Numerical simulations have been also provided illustrating graphically the theoretical results. Such simulations showed that possible chaotic behaviour seems to occur and needs more investigations.

Keywords: Variational, energy functional, existence, uniqueness, NLS system, classification, chaotic, simulation.

Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 35Q41, 35J50; Secondary: 35J10, 35Q55.

Citation: Riadh Chteoui, Abdulrahman F. Aljohani, Anouar Ben Mabrouk. Classification and simulation of chaotic behaviour of the solutions of a mixed nonlinear Schrödinger system. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29 (4) : 2561-2597. doi: 10.3934/era.2021002

References:

[1]	J. S. Aitchison, A. M. Weiner, Y. Silberberg, M. K. Oliver, J. L. Jackel, D. E. Leaird, E. M. Vogel and P. W. E. Smith, Observation of spatial optical solitons in a nonlinear glass waveguide, Opt. Lett., 15 (1990), 471-473. doi: 10.1364/OL.15.000471. Google Scholar
[2]	H. Aminikhah, F. Pournasiri and F. Mehrdoust, A novel effective approach for systems of coupled Schrödinger equation, Pramana, 86 (2016), 19-30. doi: 10.1007/s12043-015-0961-4. Google Scholar
[3]	B. Balabane, J. Dolbeault and H. Ounaeis, Nodal solutions for a sublinear elliptic equation, Nonlinear Anal., 52 (2003), 219-237. doi: 10.1016/S0362-546X(02)00104-9. Google Scholar
[4]	A. Ben Mabrouk and M. Ayadi, A linearized finite-difference method for the solution of some mixed concave and convex nonlinear problems, Appl. Math. Comput., 197 (2008), 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2007.07.051. Google Scholar
[5]	A. Ben Mabrouk and M. Ayadi, Lyapunov type operators for numerical solutions of PDEs, Appl. Math. Comput., 204 (2008), 395-407. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2008.06.061. Google Scholar
[6]	A. Ben Mabrouk and M. L. Ben Mohamed, Nodal solutions for some nonlinear elliptic equations, Appl. Math. Comput., 186 (2007), 589-597. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2006.08.003. Google Scholar
[7]	A. Ben Mabrouk and M. L. Ben Mohamed, Phase plane analysis and classification of solutions of a mixed sublinear-superlinear elliptic problem, Nonlinear Anal., 70 (2009), 1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.na.2007.11.041. Google Scholar
[8]	A. Ben Mabrouk and M. L. Ben Mohamed, Nonradial solutions of a mixed concave-convex elliptic problem, J. Partial Differ. Equ., 24 (2011), 313-323. doi: 10.4208/jpde.v24.n4.3. Google Scholar
[9]	A. Ben Mabrouk and M. L. Ben Mohamed, On some critical and slightly super-critical sub-superlinear equations, Far East J. Appl. Math., 23 (2006), 73-90. Google Scholar
[10]	A. Ben Mabrouk, M. L. Ben Mohamed and K. Omrani, Finite difference approximate solutions for a mixed sub-superlinear equation, Appl. Math. Comput., 187 (2007), 1007-1016. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2006.09.081. Google Scholar
[11]	V. Benci and D. Fortunato, Solitary waves of the nonlinear Klein-Gordon equationcoupled with Maxwell equations, Rev. Math. Phys., 14 (2020), 409-420. doi: 10.1142/S0129055X02001168. Google Scholar
[12]	R. D. Benguria, J. Dolbeault and M. J. Esteban, Classification of the solutions of semilinear elliptic problems in a ball, J. Differential Equations, 167 (2000), 438-466. doi: 10.1006/jdeq.2000.3792. Google Scholar
[13]	K. Chaïb, Necessary and sufficient conditions of existence for a system involving the $p$-Laplacian $(0 < p < N)$, J. Differential Equations, 189 (2003), 513-525. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0396(02)00094-3. Google Scholar
[14]	S. Chakravarty, M. J. Ablowitz, J. R. Sauer and R. B. Jenkins, Multisoliton interactions and wavelength-division multiplexing, Opt. Lett., 20 (1995), 136-138. doi: 10.1364/OL.20.000136. Google Scholar
[15]	R. Chteoui, A. Ben Mabrouk and H. Ounaies, Existence and properties of radial solutions of a sublinear elliptic equation, J. Partial Differ. Equ., 28 (2015), 30-38. doi: 10.4208/jpde.v28.n1.4. Google Scholar
[16]	A. K. Dhar and K. P. Das, Fourth-order nonlinear evolution equation for two Stokes wave trains in deep water, Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics, 3 (1991), 3021-3026. doi: 10.1063/1.858209. Google Scholar
[17]	M. R. Gupta, B. K. Som and B. Dasgupta, Coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations for Langmuir and elecromagnetic waves and extension of their modulational instability domain, J. Plas, Phys., 25 (1981), 499-507. doi: 10.1017/S0022377800026271. Google Scholar
[18]	F. T. Hioe, Solitary waves for two and three coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Phys. Rev. E, 58 (1998), 6700-6707. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.58.6700. Google Scholar
[19]	T. Kanna, M. Lakshmanan, P. Tchofo Dinda and N. Akhmediev, Soliton collisions with shape change by intensity redistribution in mixed coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Phys. Rev. E, 73 (2006), 026604, 15 pp. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.026604. Google Scholar
[20]	C. E. Kenig and F. Merle, Global well-posedness, scattering and blow-up for the energy-critical, focusing, non-linear Schrödinger equation in the radial case, Invent. Math., 166 (2006), 645-675. doi: 10.1007/s00222-006-0011-4. Google Scholar
[21]	S. Keraani, On the blow-up phenomenon of the critical Schrödinger equation, J. Funct. Anal., 235 (2006), 171-192. doi: 10.1016/j.jfa.2005.10.005. Google Scholar
[22]	H. Liu, Ground states of linearly coupled Schrödinger systems, Electron. J. Differential Equations, (2017), Paper No. 5, 10 pp. Google Scholar
[23]	P. Liu and S.-Y. Lou, Coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equation: Symmetries and exact solutions, Commun. Theor. Phys., 51 (2009), 27-34. doi: 10.1088/0253-6102/51/1/06. Google Scholar
[24]	Y. Martel and F. Merle, Multi solitary waves for nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire, 23 (2006), 849-864. doi: 10.1016/j.anihpc.2006.01.001. Google Scholar
[25]	C. R. Menyuk, Stability of solitons in birefringent optical fibers. II. Arbitrary amplitudes, Journal of the Optical Society of America B, 5 (1988), 392-402. doi: 10.1364/JOSAB.5.000392. Google Scholar
[26]	F. Merle, Construction of solutions with exactly $k$ blow-up points for the Schrödinger equation with critical nonlinearities, Comm. Math. Phys., 129 (1990), 223-240. doi: 10.1007/BF02096981. Google Scholar
[27]	L. F. Mollenauer, S. G. Evangelides and J. P. Gordon, Wavelength division multiplexing with solitons in ultra-long distance transmission using lumped amplifiers, J. Lightwave Technol., 9 (1991), 362-367. doi: 10.1109/50.70013. Google Scholar
[28]	H. Ounaies, Study of an elliptic equation with a singular potential, Indian J. Pure Appl. Math., 34 (2003), 111-131. Google Scholar
[29]	Z. Pinar and E. Deliktas, Solution behaviors in coupled Schrödinger equations with full-modulated nonlinearities, AIP Conference Proceedings, 1815 (2017), 080019. doi: 10.1063/1.4976451. Google Scholar
[30]	T. Saanouni, A note on coupled focusing nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Appl. Anal., 95 (2016), 2063-2080. doi: 10.1080/00036811.2015.1086757. Google Scholar
[31]	J. Serrin and H. Zou, Classification of positive solutions of quasilinear elliptic equations, Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal., 3 (1994), 1-25. doi: 10.12775/TMNA.1994.001. Google Scholar
[32]	M. Shalaby, F. Reynaud and A. Barthelemy, Experimental observation of spatial soliton interactions with a $\pi/2$ relative phase difference, Opt. Lett., 17 (1992), 778-780. Google Scholar
[33]	W. A. Strauss, Existence of solitary waves in higher dimensions, Commun. Math. Phys., 55 (1977), 149-162. doi: 10.1007/BF01626517. Google Scholar
[34]	S. L. Yadava, Uniqueness of positive radial solutions of the Dirichlet problems $-\Delta u = u^p\pm u^q$ in an annulus, J. Differential Equations, 139 (1997), 194-217. doi: 10.1006/jdeq.1997.3283. Google Scholar
[35]	E. Yanagida, Structure of radial solutions to $\Delta u+K(\|x\|)\|u\|^{p-1}u = 0$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$, SIAM. J. Math. Anal., 27 (1996), 997-1014. doi: 10.1137/0527053. Google Scholar
[36]	H.-Q. Zhang, X.-H. Meng, T. Xu, L.-L. Li and B. Tian, Interactions of bright solitons for the $(2+1)$-dimensional coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations from optical fibres with symbolic computation, Phys. Scr., 75 (2007), 537-542. doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/75/4/028. Google Scholar
[37]	Y. Zhida, Multi-soliton solutions of coupled nonlinear Schrödinger Equations., J. Chinese Physics Letters, 4 (1987), 185-187. Google Scholar
[38]	S. Zhou and X. Cheng, Numerical solution to coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations on unbounded domains, Math. Comput. Simulation, 80 (2010), 2362-2373. doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2010.05.019. Google Scholar

show all references

References:

[1]	J. S. Aitchison, A. M. Weiner, Y. Silberberg, M. K. Oliver, J. L. Jackel, D. E. Leaird, E. M. Vogel and P. W. E. Smith, Observation of spatial optical solitons in a nonlinear glass waveguide, Opt. Lett., 15 (1990), 471-473. doi: 10.1364/OL.15.000471. Google Scholar
[2]	H. Aminikhah, F. Pournasiri and F. Mehrdoust, A novel effective approach for systems of coupled Schrödinger equation, Pramana, 86 (2016), 19-30. doi: 10.1007/s12043-015-0961-4. Google Scholar
[3]	B. Balabane, J. Dolbeault and H. Ounaeis, Nodal solutions for a sublinear elliptic equation, Nonlinear Anal., 52 (2003), 219-237. doi: 10.1016/S0362-546X(02)00104-9. Google Scholar
[4]	A. Ben Mabrouk and M. Ayadi, A linearized finite-difference method for the solution of some mixed concave and convex nonlinear problems, Appl. Math. Comput., 197 (2008), 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2007.07.051. Google Scholar
[5]	A. Ben Mabrouk and M. Ayadi, Lyapunov type operators for numerical solutions of PDEs, Appl. Math. Comput., 204 (2008), 395-407. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2008.06.061. Google Scholar
[6]	A. Ben Mabrouk and M. L. Ben Mohamed, Nodal solutions for some nonlinear elliptic equations, Appl. Math. Comput., 186 (2007), 589-597. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2006.08.003. Google Scholar
[7]	A. Ben Mabrouk and M. L. Ben Mohamed, Phase plane analysis and classification of solutions of a mixed sublinear-superlinear elliptic problem, Nonlinear Anal., 70 (2009), 1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.na.2007.11.041. Google Scholar
[8]	A. Ben Mabrouk and M. L. Ben Mohamed, Nonradial solutions of a mixed concave-convex elliptic problem, J. Partial Differ. Equ., 24 (2011), 313-323. doi: 10.4208/jpde.v24.n4.3. Google Scholar
[9]	A. Ben Mabrouk and M. L. Ben Mohamed, On some critical and slightly super-critical sub-superlinear equations, Far East J. Appl. Math., 23 (2006), 73-90. Google Scholar
[10]	A. Ben Mabrouk, M. L. Ben Mohamed and K. Omrani, Finite difference approximate solutions for a mixed sub-superlinear equation, Appl. Math. Comput., 187 (2007), 1007-1016. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2006.09.081. Google Scholar
[11]	V. Benci and D. Fortunato, Solitary waves of the nonlinear Klein-Gordon equationcoupled with Maxwell equations, Rev. Math. Phys., 14 (2020), 409-420. doi: 10.1142/S0129055X02001168. Google Scholar
[12]	R. D. Benguria, J. Dolbeault and M. J. Esteban, Classification of the solutions of semilinear elliptic problems in a ball, J. Differential Equations, 167 (2000), 438-466. doi: 10.1006/jdeq.2000.3792. Google Scholar
[13]	K. Chaïb, Necessary and sufficient conditions of existence for a system involving the $p$-Laplacian $(0 < p < N)$, J. Differential Equations, 189 (2003), 513-525. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0396(02)00094-3. Google Scholar
[14]	S. Chakravarty, M. J. Ablowitz, J. R. Sauer and R. B. Jenkins, Multisoliton interactions and wavelength-division multiplexing, Opt. Lett., 20 (1995), 136-138. doi: 10.1364/OL.20.000136. Google Scholar
[15]	R. Chteoui, A. Ben Mabrouk and H. Ounaies, Existence and properties of radial solutions of a sublinear elliptic equation, J. Partial Differ. Equ., 28 (2015), 30-38. doi: 10.4208/jpde.v28.n1.4. Google Scholar
[16]	A. K. Dhar and K. P. Das, Fourth-order nonlinear evolution equation for two Stokes wave trains in deep water, Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics, 3 (1991), 3021-3026. doi: 10.1063/1.858209. Google Scholar
[17]	M. R. Gupta, B. K. Som and B. Dasgupta, Coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations for Langmuir and elecromagnetic waves and extension of their modulational instability domain, J. Plas, Phys., 25 (1981), 499-507. doi: 10.1017/S0022377800026271. Google Scholar
[18]	F. T. Hioe, Solitary waves for two and three coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Phys. Rev. E, 58 (1998), 6700-6707. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.58.6700. Google Scholar
[19]	T. Kanna, M. Lakshmanan, P. Tchofo Dinda and N. Akhmediev, Soliton collisions with shape change by intensity redistribution in mixed coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Phys. Rev. E, 73 (2006), 026604, 15 pp. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.026604. Google Scholar
[20]	C. E. Kenig and F. Merle, Global well-posedness, scattering and blow-up for the energy-critical, focusing, non-linear Schrödinger equation in the radial case, Invent. Math., 166 (2006), 645-675. doi: 10.1007/s00222-006-0011-4. Google Scholar
[21]	S. Keraani, On the blow-up phenomenon of the critical Schrödinger equation, J. Funct. Anal., 235 (2006), 171-192. doi: 10.1016/j.jfa.2005.10.005. Google Scholar
[22]	H. Liu, Ground states of linearly coupled Schrödinger systems, Electron. J. Differential Equations, (2017), Paper No. 5, 10 pp. Google Scholar
[23]	P. Liu and S.-Y. Lou, Coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equation: Symmetries and exact solutions, Commun. Theor. Phys., 51 (2009), 27-34. doi: 10.1088/0253-6102/51/1/06. Google Scholar
[24]	Y. Martel and F. Merle, Multi solitary waves for nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire, 23 (2006), 849-864. doi: 10.1016/j.anihpc.2006.01.001. Google Scholar
[25]	C. R. Menyuk, Stability of solitons in birefringent optical fibers. II. Arbitrary amplitudes, Journal of the Optical Society of America B, 5 (1988), 392-402. doi: 10.1364/JOSAB.5.000392. Google Scholar
[26]	F. Merle, Construction of solutions with exactly $k$ blow-up points for the Schrödinger equation with critical nonlinearities, Comm. Math. Phys., 129 (1990), 223-240. doi: 10.1007/BF02096981. Google Scholar
[27]	L. F. Mollenauer, S. G. Evangelides and J. P. Gordon, Wavelength division multiplexing with solitons in ultra-long distance transmission using lumped amplifiers, J. Lightwave Technol., 9 (1991), 362-367. doi: 10.1109/50.70013. Google Scholar
[28]	H. Ounaies, Study of an elliptic equation with a singular potential, Indian J. Pure Appl. Math., 34 (2003), 111-131. Google Scholar
[29]	Z. Pinar and E. Deliktas, Solution behaviors in coupled Schrödinger equations with full-modulated nonlinearities, AIP Conference Proceedings, 1815 (2017), 080019. doi: 10.1063/1.4976451. Google Scholar
[30]	T. Saanouni, A note on coupled focusing nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Appl. Anal., 95 (2016), 2063-2080. doi: 10.1080/00036811.2015.1086757. Google Scholar
[31]	J. Serrin and H. Zou, Classification of positive solutions of quasilinear elliptic equations, Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal., 3 (1994), 1-25. doi: 10.12775/TMNA.1994.001. Google Scholar
[32]	M. Shalaby, F. Reynaud and A. Barthelemy, Experimental observation of spatial soliton interactions with a $\pi/2$ relative phase difference, Opt. Lett., 17 (1992), 778-780. Google Scholar
[33]	W. A. Strauss, Existence of solitary waves in higher dimensions, Commun. Math. Phys., 55 (1977), 149-162. doi: 10.1007/BF01626517. Google Scholar
[34]	S. L. Yadava, Uniqueness of positive radial solutions of the Dirichlet problems $-\Delta u = u^p\pm u^q$ in an annulus, J. Differential Equations, 139 (1997), 194-217. doi: 10.1006/jdeq.1997.3283. Google Scholar
[35]	E. Yanagida, Structure of radial solutions to $\Delta u+K(\|x\|)\|u\|^{p-1}u = 0$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$, SIAM. J. Math. Anal., 27 (1996), 997-1014. doi: 10.1137/0527053. Google Scholar
[36]	H.-Q. Zhang, X.-H. Meng, T. Xu, L.-L. Li and B. Tian, Interactions of bright solitons for the $(2+1)$-dimensional coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations from optical fibres with symbolic computation, Phys. Scr., 75 (2007), 537-542. doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/75/4/028. Google Scholar
[37]	Y. Zhida, Multi-soliton solutions of coupled nonlinear Schrödinger Equations., J. Chinese Physics Letters, 4 (1987), 185-187. Google Scholar
[38]	S. Zhou and X. Cheng, Numerical solution to coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations on unbounded domains, Math. Comput. Simulation, 80 (2010), 2362-2373. doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2010.05.019. Google Scholar

Figure 1. Partition of the plane $ \mathbb{R}^2 $ according to the curves $ \Gamma_{1} $ and $ \Gamma_{2} $ for $ p = 1.5 $ and $ \omega = 2 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2. Partition of the plane $ \mathbb{R}^2 $ according to $ \Gamma_1 $, $ \Gamma_{2} $ and $ \Lambda $ for $ p = 1.5 $ and $ \omega = 2 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3. $ (u,v) $ for $ (a,b) = (0.25,2.75)\in\Omega_1 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4. The solution $ (u,v) $ for $ (a,b) = (1,\omega_3-0.1)\in\Omega_1 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 5. The solutions $ u $ and $ v $ separately for $ (a,b) = (0.25,2.75)\in\Omega_1 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 6. The phase plane portrait $ (u',u) $ for $ (a,b) = (0.25,2.75)\in\Omega_1 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 7. The phase plane portrait $ (v',v) $ for $ (a,b) = (0.25,2.75)\in\Omega_1 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 8. The partition of $ \Omega_2 $ according to the curve $ \Lambda $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 9. The solution $ (u,v) $ for $ (a,b) = (0.45,0.95)\in\Omega_2^1 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 10. The solution $ (u,v) $ for $ (a,b) = (0.5,0.75)\in\Omega_2^1 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 11. The solution $ (u,v) $ for $ (a,b) = (0.4,0.5)\in\Omega_2^1 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 12. The solutions $ u $ an $ v $ separately for $ (a,b) = (0.45,0.5)\in\Omega_2^1 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 13. The solution $ (u,v) $ for $ p = 2 $, $ \omega = 2 $ and $ (a,b) = (2.5,4)\in\Omega_{ext,1} $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 14. The solution $ (u,v) $ for $ p = 2 $, $ \omega = 2 $ and $ (a,b) = (1,6.5)\in\Omega_{ext,1} $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 15. The solutions $ u $ and $ v $ separately for $ p = 2 $, $ \omega = 2 $ and $ (a,b) = (0.5,5)\in\Omega_{ext,1} $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 16. The solution $ u $ and $ v $ separately for $ p = 2 $, $ \omega = 2 $ and $ (a,b) = (3.5,4)\in\Omega_{ext,1} $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 17. The solution $ (u,v) $ for $ p = 1.5 $, $ \omega = 2 $ and $ (a,b) = (0.5,3.0625)\in)A,B( $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 18. The solution $ (u,v) $ for $ p = 1.5 $, $ \omega = 2 $ and $ (a,b) = (0.9511,1.2)\in)A,B( $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 19. The solutions $ u $ and $ v $ separately for $ p = 1.5 $, $ \omega = 2 $ and $ (a,b) = (0.5,3.0625)\in)A,B( $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 20. The solutions $ u $ and $ v $ separately for $ p = 1.5 $, $ \omega = 2 $ and $ (a,b) = (0.9511,1.2)\in)A,B( $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 21. The solution $ (u,v) $ for $ p = 1.5 $, $ \omega = 2 $ and $ (a,b) = (0.1,1.2976)\in)I,B( $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 22. The solution $ (u,v) $ for $ p = 1.5 $, $ \omega = 2 $ and $ (a,b) = (0.5,1.1371)\in)I,B( $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 23. The solutions $ u $ and $ v $ separately for $ (a,b) = (0.1,1.2976)\in)I,B( $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 24. The chaotic behavior for $ p = 1.5 $, $ w = 2 $ and $ (a,b) = (0.2,0.4) $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 25. The chaotic behavior for $ p = 1.5 $, $ w = 2 $ and $ (a,b) = (2,4) $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 26. The chaotic behavior for $ p = 2.5 $, $ w = 3 $ and $ (a,b) = (0.2,0.14) $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 27. The chaotic behavior for $ p = 2.5 $, $ w = 2 $ and $ (a,b) = (2,4) $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 28. The partition of the plane according to $ \Gamma_1 $, $ \Gamma_2 $ and $ \Lambda $ for $ w = 0 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 29. The solution $ (u,v) $ for $ p = 1.5 $, $ w = 0 $ and $ (a,b) = (0.25,0.5538)\in\Lambda $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 30. The solution $ (u,v) $ for $ p = 1.5 $, $ w = 0 $ and $ (a,b) = (0.25,0.35)\in R_2 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 31. The solution $ (u,v) $ for $ p = 1.5 $, $ w = 0 $ and $ (a,b) = (0.5,1)\in R_1 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 32. The solution $ (u,v) $ for $ p = 1.5 $, $ w = 0 $ and $ (a,b) = (2.5,3.5)\in R_1 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 33. The portrait $ (u',u) $ for $ p = 1.5 $, $ w = 0 $ and $ (a,b) = (0.25,0.5538)\in\Lambda $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 34. The portrait $ (v',v) $ for $ p = 1.5 $, $ w = 0 $ and $ (a,b) = (0.25,0.35)\in R_2 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 35. The solutions $ u $ (in blue) and $ v $ (in pink) for $ p = 1.5 $, $ w = 0 $ and $ (a,b) = (0.5,1)\in R_1 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 36. The energy $ E(u,v)(x) $ for $ p = 1.5 $, $ (a,b) = (0.15,25)\in R_2 $, $ w = 0 $ at the top and $ w = 2 $ at the bottom

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 37. Parameters' domains for $ p = 1.5 $, $ \omega = 0.5 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 38. Parameters' domains for $ p = 3.5 $, $ \omega = 0.5 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 39. Parameters' domains for $ p = 1.5 $, $ \omega = 1 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 40. Parameters' domains for $ p = 3.5 $, $ \omega = 1 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Table 1. Some illustrative cases of problem (34) for $ p = 1.5 $

Corresponding Figure	Figure 29	Figure 30	Figure 31	Figure 32
$ a $	$ 0.25 $	$ 0.25 $	$ 0.5 $	$ 2.5 $
$ b $	$ 0.5538 $	$ 0.35 $	$ 1 $	$ 3.5 $
Initial value region	$ (a,b)\in\Lambda $	$ (a,b)\in R_2 $	$ (a,b)\in R_1 $	$ (a,b)\in R_1 $

Download as excel

Corresponding Figure	Figure 29	Figure 30	Figure 31	Figure 32
$ a $	$ 0.25 $	$ 0.25 $	$ 0.5 $	$ 2.5 $
$ b $	$ 0.5538 $	$ 0.35 $	$ 1 $	$ 3.5 $
Initial value region	$ (a,b)\in\Lambda $	$ (a,b)\in R_2 $	$ (a,b)\in R_1 $	$ (a,b)\in R_1 $

[1]	Jochen Bröcker. Existence and uniqueness for variational data assimilation in continuous time. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2021 doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2021050
[2]	Rémi Carles, Erwan Faou. Energy cascades for NLS on the torus. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2012, 32 (6) : 2063-2077. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.2063
[3]	Patrick Cummings, C. Eugene Wayne. Modified energy functionals and the NLS approximation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2017, 37 (3) : 1295-1321. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017054
[4]	Thi-Bich-Ngoc Mac. Existence of solution for a system of repulsion and alignment: Comparison between theory and simulation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2015, 20 (9) : 3013-3027. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2015.20.3013
[5]	Tong Yang, Fahuai Yi. Global existence and uniqueness for a hyperbolic system with free boundary. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2001, 7 (4) : 763-780. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2001.7.763
[6]	Dominique Blanchard, Nicolas Bruyère, Olivier Guibé. Existence and uniqueness of the solution of a Boussinesq system with nonlinear dissipation. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2013, 12 (5) : 2213-2227. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2013.12.2213
[7]	François James, Nicolas Vauchelet. One-dimensional aggregation equation after blow up: Existence, uniqueness and numerical simulation. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2016, 11 (1) : 163-180. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2016.11.163
[8]	Casey Jao. Energy-critical NLS with potentials of quadratic growth. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2018, 38 (2) : 563-587. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018025
[9]	Yong Zeng. Existence and uniqueness of very weak solution of the MHD type system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2020, 40 (10) : 5617-5638. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020240
[10]	Fangfang Jiang, Junping Shi, Qing-guo Wang, Jitao Sun. On the existence and uniqueness of a limit cycle for a Liénard system with a discontinuity line. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2016, 15 (6) : 2509-2526. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2016047
[11]	Kota Ikeda. The existence and uniqueness of unstable eigenvalues for stripe patterns in the Gierer-Meinhardt system. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2013, 8 (1) : 291-325. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2013.8.291
[12]	Guillermo Reyes, Juan-Luis Vázquez. The inhomogeneous PME in several space dimensions. Existence and uniqueness of finite energy solutions. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2008, 7 (6) : 1275-1294. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2008.7.1275
[13]	Hassan Khassehkhan, Messoud A. Efendiev, Hermann J. Eberl. A degenerate diffusion-reaction model of an amensalistic biofilm control system: Existence and simulation of solutions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2009, 12 (2) : 371-388. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2009.12.371
[14]	Sergio Amat, Pablo Pedregal. On a variational approach for the analysis and numerical simulation of ODEs. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2013, 33 (4) : 1275-1291. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.1275
[15]	Riccardo Adami, Diego Noja, Nicola Visciglia. Constrained energy minimization and ground states for NLS with point defects. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2013, 18 (5) : 1155-1188. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.1155
[16]	Rowan Killip, Changxing Miao, Monica Visan, Junyong Zhang, Jiqiang Zheng. The energy-critical NLS with inverse-square potential. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2017, 37 (7) : 3831-3866. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017162
[17]	Gisèle Ruiz Goldstein, Jerome A. Goldstein, Naima Naheed. A convexified energy functional for the Fermi-Amaldi correction. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2010, 28 (1) : 41-65. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.28.41
[18]	Rui Peng, Xianfa Song, Lei Wei. Existence, nonexistence and uniqueness of positive stationary solutions of a singular Gierer-Meinhardt system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2017, 37 (8) : 4489-4505. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017192
[19]	Chunxiao Guo, Fan Cui, Yongqian Han. Global existence and uniqueness of the solution for the fractional Schrödinger-KdV-Burgers system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2016, 9 (6) : 1687-1699. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016070
[20]	Marta Strani. Existence and uniqueness of a positive connection for the scalar viscous shallow water system in a bounded interval. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2014, 13 (4) : 1653-1667. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2014.13.1653

2020 Impact Factor: 1.833

Tools

Metrics

Other articles
by authors

on AIMS
Riadh Chteoui Abdulrahman F. Aljohani Anouar Ben Mabrouk
on Google Scholar
Riadh Chteoui Abdulrahman F. Aljohani Anouar Ben Mabrouk

2020 Impact Factor: 1.833

Tools

Article outline

Figures and Tables

2020 Impact Factor: 1.833

Tools

Figures and Tables

2020 Impact Factor: 1.833

Tools

Metrics

Other articles
by authors

on AIMS
Riadh Chteoui Abdulrahman F. Aljohani Anouar Ben Mabrouk
on Google Scholar
Riadh Chteoui Abdulrahman F. Aljohani Anouar Ben Mabrouk

[Back to Top]