Classification and simulation of chaotic behaviour of the solutions of a mixed nonlinear Schrödinger system

Previous Article
A multigrid based finite difference method for solving parabolic interface problem
ERA Home
This Issue
Next Article
A C0 interior penalty method for the Cahn-Hilliard equation

doi: 10.3934/era.2021002

Classification and simulation of chaotic behaviour of the solutions of a mixed nonlinear Schrödinger system

Riadh Chteoui ^1,2, , Abdulrahman F. Aljohani ^3, and Anouar Ben Mabrouk ^2,4,5,,

1.	Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Tabuk, Saudi Arabia, Lab. of Algebra, Number Theory and Nonlinear Analysis, Department of Mathematics
2.	Faculty of Sciences, University of Monastir, 5000 Monastir, Tunisia
3.	Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
4.	Department of Mathematics, Higher Institute of Applied Mathematics and Computer, Science, University of Kairouan, Street of Assad Ibn Alfourat, 3100 Kairouan, Tunisia, Lab. of Algebra, Number Theory and Nonlinear Analysis, Department of Mathematics
5.	Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Tabuk, Saudi Arabia

^* Corresponding author: Anouar Ben Mabrouk

Received August 2020 Revised November 2020 Published January 2021

In this paper, we study a couple of NLS equations characterized by mixed cubic and super-linear sub-cubic power laws. Classification as well as existence and uniqueness of the steady state solutions have been investigated. Numerical simulations have been also provided illustrating graphically the theoretical results. Such simulations showed that possible chaotic behaviour seems to occur and needs more investigations.

Keywords: Variational, energy functional, existence, uniqueness, NLS system, classification, chaotic, simulation.

Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 35Q41, 35J50; Secondary: 35J10, 35Q55.

Citation: Riadh Chteoui, Abdulrahman F. Aljohani, Anouar Ben Mabrouk. Classification and simulation of chaotic behaviour of the solutions of a mixed nonlinear Schrödinger system. Electronic Research Archive, doi: 10.3934/era.2021002

References:

[1]	J. S. Aitchison, A. M. Weiner, Y. Silberberg, M. K. Oliver, J. L. Jackel, D. E. Leaird, E. M. Vogel and P. W. E. Smith, Observation of spatial optical solitons in a nonlinear glass waveguide, Opt. Lett., 15 (1990), 471-473. doi: 10.1364/OL.15.000471. Google Scholar
[2]	H. Aminikhah, F. Pournasiri and F. Mehrdoust, A novel effective approach for systems of coupled Schrödinger equation, Pramana, 86 (2016), 19-30. doi: 10.1007/s12043-015-0961-4. Google Scholar
[3]	B. Balabane, J. Dolbeault and H. Ounaeis, Nodal solutions for a sublinear elliptic equation, Nonlinear Anal., 52 (2003), 219-237. doi: 10.1016/S0362-546X(02)00104-9. Google Scholar
[4]	A. Ben Mabrouk and M. Ayadi, A linearized finite-difference method for the solution of some mixed concave and convex nonlinear problems, Appl. Math. Comput., 197 (2008), 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2007.07.051. Google Scholar
[5]	A. Ben Mabrouk and M. Ayadi, Lyapunov type operators for numerical solutions of PDEs, Appl. Math. Comput., 204 (2008), 395-407. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2008.06.061. Google Scholar
[6]	A. Ben Mabrouk and M. L. Ben Mohamed, Nodal solutions for some nonlinear elliptic equations, Appl. Math. Comput., 186 (2007), 589-597. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2006.08.003. Google Scholar
[7]	A. Ben Mabrouk and M. L. Ben Mohamed, Phase plane analysis and classification of solutions of a mixed sublinear-superlinear elliptic problem, Nonlinear Anal., 70 (2009), 1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.na.2007.11.041. Google Scholar
[8]	A. Ben Mabrouk and M. L. Ben Mohamed, Nonradial solutions of a mixed concave-convex elliptic problem, J. Partial Differ. Equ., 24 (2011), 313-323. doi: 10.4208/jpde.v24.n4.3. Google Scholar
[9]	A. Ben Mabrouk and M. L. Ben Mohamed, On some critical and slightly super-critical sub-superlinear equations, Far East J. Appl. Math., 23 (2006), 73-90. Google Scholar
[10]	A. Ben Mabrouk, M. L. Ben Mohamed and K. Omrani, Finite difference approximate solutions for a mixed sub-superlinear equation, Appl. Math. Comput., 187 (2007), 1007-1016. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2006.09.081. Google Scholar
[11]	V. Benci and D. Fortunato, Solitary waves of the nonlinear Klein-Gordon equationcoupled with Maxwell equations, Rev. Math. Phys., 14 (2020), 409-420. doi: 10.1142/S0129055X02001168. Google Scholar
[12]	R. D. Benguria, J. Dolbeault and M. J. Esteban, Classification of the solutions of semilinear elliptic problems in a ball, J. Differential Equations, 167 (2000), 438-466. doi: 10.1006/jdeq.2000.3792. Google Scholar
[13]	K. Chaïb, Necessary and sufficient conditions of existence for a system involving the $p$-Laplacian $(0 < p < N)$, J. Differential Equations, 189 (2003), 513-525. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0396(02)00094-3. Google Scholar
[14]	S. Chakravarty, M. J. Ablowitz, J. R. Sauer and R. B. Jenkins, Multisoliton interactions and wavelength-division multiplexing, Opt. Lett., 20 (1995), 136-138. doi: 10.1364/OL.20.000136. Google Scholar
[15]	R. Chteoui, A. Ben Mabrouk and H. Ounaies, Existence and properties of radial solutions of a sublinear elliptic equation, J. Partial Differ. Equ., 28 (2015), 30-38. doi: 10.4208/jpde.v28.n1.4. Google Scholar
[16]	A. K. Dhar and K. P. Das, Fourth-order nonlinear evolution equation for two Stokes wave trains in deep water, Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics, 3 (1991), 3021-3026. doi: 10.1063/1.858209. Google Scholar
[17]	M. R. Gupta, B. K. Som and B. Dasgupta, Coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations for Langmuir and elecromagnetic waves and extension of their modulational instability domain, J. Plas, Phys., 25 (1981), 499-507. doi: 10.1017/S0022377800026271. Google Scholar
[18]	F. T. Hioe, Solitary waves for two and three coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Phys. Rev. E, 58 (1998), 6700-6707. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.58.6700. Google Scholar
[19]	T. Kanna, M. Lakshmanan, P. Tchofo Dinda and N. Akhmediev, Soliton collisions with shape change by intensity redistribution in mixed coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Phys. Rev. E, 73 (2006), 026604, 15 pp. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.026604. Google Scholar
[20]	C. E. Kenig and F. Merle, Global well-posedness, scattering and blow-up for the energy-critical, focusing, non-linear Schrödinger equation in the radial case, Invent. Math., 166 (2006), 645-675. doi: 10.1007/s00222-006-0011-4. Google Scholar
[21]	S. Keraani, On the blow-up phenomenon of the critical Schrödinger equation, J. Funct. Anal., 235 (2006), 171-192. doi: 10.1016/j.jfa.2005.10.005. Google Scholar
[22]	H. Liu, Ground states of linearly coupled Schrödinger systems, Electron. J. Differential Equations, (2017), Paper No. 5, 10 pp. Google Scholar
[23]	P. Liu and S.-Y. Lou, Coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equation: Symmetries and exact solutions, Commun. Theor. Phys., 51 (2009), 27-34. doi: 10.1088/0253-6102/51/1/06. Google Scholar
[24]	Y. Martel and F. Merle, Multi solitary waves for nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire, 23 (2006), 849-864. doi: 10.1016/j.anihpc.2006.01.001. Google Scholar
[25]	C. R. Menyuk, Stability of solitons in birefringent optical fibers. II. Arbitrary amplitudes, Journal of the Optical Society of America B, 5 (1988), 392-402. doi: 10.1364/JOSAB.5.000392. Google Scholar
[26]	F. Merle, Construction of solutions with exactly $k$ blow-up points for the Schrödinger equation with critical nonlinearities, Comm. Math. Phys., 129 (1990), 223-240. doi: 10.1007/BF02096981. Google Scholar
[27]	L. F. Mollenauer, S. G. Evangelides and J. P. Gordon, Wavelength division multiplexing with solitons in ultra-long distance transmission using lumped amplifiers, J. Lightwave Technol., 9 (1991), 362-367. doi: 10.1109/50.70013. Google Scholar
[28]	H. Ounaies, Study of an elliptic equation with a singular potential, Indian J. Pure Appl. Math., 34 (2003), 111-131. Google Scholar
[29]	Z. Pinar and E. Deliktas, Solution behaviors in coupled Schrödinger equations with full-modulated nonlinearities, AIP Conference Proceedings, 1815 (2017), 080019. doi: 10.1063/1.4976451. Google Scholar
[30]	T. Saanouni, A note on coupled focusing nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Appl. Anal., 95 (2016), 2063-2080. doi: 10.1080/00036811.2015.1086757. Google Scholar
[31]	J. Serrin and H. Zou, Classification of positive solutions of quasilinear elliptic equations, Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal., 3 (1994), 1-25. doi: 10.12775/TMNA.1994.001. Google Scholar
[32]	M. Shalaby, F. Reynaud and A. Barthelemy, Experimental observation of spatial soliton interactions with a $\pi/2$ relative phase difference, Opt. Lett., 17 (1992), 778-780. Google Scholar
[33]	W. A. Strauss, Existence of solitary waves in higher dimensions, Commun. Math. Phys., 55 (1977), 149-162. doi: 10.1007/BF01626517. Google Scholar
[34]	S. L. Yadava, Uniqueness of positive radial solutions of the Dirichlet problems $-\Delta u = u^p\pm u^q$ in an annulus, J. Differential Equations, 139 (1997), 194-217. doi: 10.1006/jdeq.1997.3283. Google Scholar
[35]	E. Yanagida, Structure of radial solutions to $\Delta u+K(\|x\|)\|u\|^{p-1}u = 0$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$, SIAM. J. Math. Anal., 27 (1996), 997-1014. doi: 10.1137/0527053. Google Scholar
[36]	H.-Q. Zhang, X.-H. Meng, T. Xu, L.-L. Li and B. Tian, Interactions of bright solitons for the $(2+1)$-dimensional coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations from optical fibres with symbolic computation, Phys. Scr., 75 (2007), 537-542. doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/75/4/028. Google Scholar
[37]	Y. Zhida, Multi-soliton solutions of coupled nonlinear Schrödinger Equations., J. Chinese Physics Letters, 4 (1987), 185-187. Google Scholar
[38]	S. Zhou and X. Cheng, Numerical solution to coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations on unbounded domains, Math. Comput. Simulation, 80 (2010), 2362-2373. doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2010.05.019. Google Scholar

show all references

References:

[1]	J. S. Aitchison, A. M. Weiner, Y. Silberberg, M. K. Oliver, J. L. Jackel, D. E. Leaird, E. M. Vogel and P. W. E. Smith, Observation of spatial optical solitons in a nonlinear glass waveguide, Opt. Lett., 15 (1990), 471-473. doi: 10.1364/OL.15.000471. Google Scholar
[2]	H. Aminikhah, F. Pournasiri and F. Mehrdoust, A novel effective approach for systems of coupled Schrödinger equation, Pramana, 86 (2016), 19-30. doi: 10.1007/s12043-015-0961-4. Google Scholar
[3]	B. Balabane, J. Dolbeault and H. Ounaeis, Nodal solutions for a sublinear elliptic equation, Nonlinear Anal., 52 (2003), 219-237. doi: 10.1016/S0362-546X(02)00104-9. Google Scholar
[4]	A. Ben Mabrouk and M. Ayadi, A linearized finite-difference method for the solution of some mixed concave and convex nonlinear problems, Appl. Math. Comput., 197 (2008), 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2007.07.051. Google Scholar
[5]	A. Ben Mabrouk and M. Ayadi, Lyapunov type operators for numerical solutions of PDEs, Appl. Math. Comput., 204 (2008), 395-407. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2008.06.061. Google Scholar
[6]	A. Ben Mabrouk and M. L. Ben Mohamed, Nodal solutions for some nonlinear elliptic equations, Appl. Math. Comput., 186 (2007), 589-597. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2006.08.003. Google Scholar
[7]	A. Ben Mabrouk and M. L. Ben Mohamed, Phase plane analysis and classification of solutions of a mixed sublinear-superlinear elliptic problem, Nonlinear Anal., 70 (2009), 1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.na.2007.11.041. Google Scholar
[8]	A. Ben Mabrouk and M. L. Ben Mohamed, Nonradial solutions of a mixed concave-convex elliptic problem, J. Partial Differ. Equ., 24 (2011), 313-323. doi: 10.4208/jpde.v24.n4.3. Google Scholar
[9]	A. Ben Mabrouk and M. L. Ben Mohamed, On some critical and slightly super-critical sub-superlinear equations, Far East J. Appl. Math., 23 (2006), 73-90. Google Scholar
[10]	A. Ben Mabrouk, M. L. Ben Mohamed and K. Omrani, Finite difference approximate solutions for a mixed sub-superlinear equation, Appl. Math. Comput., 187 (2007), 1007-1016. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2006.09.081. Google Scholar
[11]	V. Benci and D. Fortunato, Solitary waves of the nonlinear Klein-Gordon equationcoupled with Maxwell equations, Rev. Math. Phys., 14 (2020), 409-420. doi: 10.1142/S0129055X02001168. Google Scholar
[12]	R. D. Benguria, J. Dolbeault and M. J. Esteban, Classification of the solutions of semilinear elliptic problems in a ball, J. Differential Equations, 167 (2000), 438-466. doi: 10.1006/jdeq.2000.3792. Google Scholar
[13]	K. Chaïb, Necessary and sufficient conditions of existence for a system involving the $p$-Laplacian $(0 < p < N)$, J. Differential Equations, 189 (2003), 513-525. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0396(02)00094-3. Google Scholar
[14]	S. Chakravarty, M. J. Ablowitz, J. R. Sauer and R. B. Jenkins, Multisoliton interactions and wavelength-division multiplexing, Opt. Lett., 20 (1995), 136-138. doi: 10.1364/OL.20.000136. Google Scholar
[15]	R. Chteoui, A. Ben Mabrouk and H. Ounaies, Existence and properties of radial solutions of a sublinear elliptic equation, J. Partial Differ. Equ., 28 (2015), 30-38. doi: 10.4208/jpde.v28.n1.4. Google Scholar
[16]	A. K. Dhar and K. P. Das, Fourth-order nonlinear evolution equation for two Stokes wave trains in deep water, Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics, 3 (1991), 3021-3026. doi: 10.1063/1.858209. Google Scholar
[17]	M. R. Gupta, B. K. Som and B. Dasgupta, Coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations for Langmuir and elecromagnetic waves and extension of their modulational instability domain, J. Plas, Phys., 25 (1981), 499-507. doi: 10.1017/S0022377800026271. Google Scholar
[18]	F. T. Hioe, Solitary waves for two and three coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Phys. Rev. E, 58 (1998), 6700-6707. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.58.6700. Google Scholar
[19]	T. Kanna, M. Lakshmanan, P. Tchofo Dinda and N. Akhmediev, Soliton collisions with shape change by intensity redistribution in mixed coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Phys. Rev. E, 73 (2006), 026604, 15 pp. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.026604. Google Scholar
[20]	C. E. Kenig and F. Merle, Global well-posedness, scattering and blow-up for the energy-critical, focusing, non-linear Schrödinger equation in the radial case, Invent. Math., 166 (2006), 645-675. doi: 10.1007/s00222-006-0011-4. Google Scholar
[21]	S. Keraani, On the blow-up phenomenon of the critical Schrödinger equation, J. Funct. Anal., 235 (2006), 171-192. doi: 10.1016/j.jfa.2005.10.005. Google Scholar
[22]	H. Liu, Ground states of linearly coupled Schrödinger systems, Electron. J. Differential Equations, (2017), Paper No. 5, 10 pp. Google Scholar
[23]	P. Liu and S.-Y. Lou, Coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equation: Symmetries and exact solutions, Commun. Theor. Phys., 51 (2009), 27-34. doi: 10.1088/0253-6102/51/1/06. Google Scholar
[24]	Y. Martel and F. Merle, Multi solitary waves for nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire, 23 (2006), 849-864. doi: 10.1016/j.anihpc.2006.01.001. Google Scholar
[25]	C. R. Menyuk, Stability of solitons in birefringent optical fibers. II. Arbitrary amplitudes, Journal of the Optical Society of America B, 5 (1988), 392-402. doi: 10.1364/JOSAB.5.000392. Google Scholar
[26]	F. Merle, Construction of solutions with exactly $k$ blow-up points for the Schrödinger equation with critical nonlinearities, Comm. Math. Phys., 129 (1990), 223-240. doi: 10.1007/BF02096981. Google Scholar
[27]	L. F. Mollenauer, S. G. Evangelides and J. P. Gordon, Wavelength division multiplexing with solitons in ultra-long distance transmission using lumped amplifiers, J. Lightwave Technol., 9 (1991), 362-367. doi: 10.1109/50.70013. Google Scholar
[28]	H. Ounaies, Study of an elliptic equation with a singular potential, Indian J. Pure Appl. Math., 34 (2003), 111-131. Google Scholar
[29]	Z. Pinar and E. Deliktas, Solution behaviors in coupled Schrödinger equations with full-modulated nonlinearities, AIP Conference Proceedings, 1815 (2017), 080019. doi: 10.1063/1.4976451. Google Scholar
[30]	T. Saanouni, A note on coupled focusing nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Appl. Anal., 95 (2016), 2063-2080. doi: 10.1080/00036811.2015.1086757. Google Scholar
[31]	J. Serrin and H. Zou, Classification of positive solutions of quasilinear elliptic equations, Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal., 3 (1994), 1-25. doi: 10.12775/TMNA.1994.001. Google Scholar
[32]	M. Shalaby, F. Reynaud and A. Barthelemy, Experimental observation of spatial soliton interactions with a $\pi/2$ relative phase difference, Opt. Lett., 17 (1992), 778-780. Google Scholar
[33]	W. A. Strauss, Existence of solitary waves in higher dimensions, Commun. Math. Phys., 55 (1977), 149-162. doi: 10.1007/BF01626517. Google Scholar
[34]	S. L. Yadava, Uniqueness of positive radial solutions of the Dirichlet problems $-\Delta u = u^p\pm u^q$ in an annulus, J. Differential Equations, 139 (1997), 194-217. doi: 10.1006/jdeq.1997.3283. Google Scholar
[35]	E. Yanagida, Structure of radial solutions to $\Delta u+K(\|x\|)\|u\|^{p-1}u = 0$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$, SIAM. J. Math. Anal., 27 (1996), 997-1014. doi: 10.1137/0527053. Google Scholar
[36]	H.-Q. Zhang, X.-H. Meng, T. Xu, L.-L. Li and B. Tian, Interactions of bright solitons for the $(2+1)$-dimensional coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations from optical fibres with symbolic computation, Phys. Scr., 75 (2007), 537-542. doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/75/4/028. Google Scholar
[37]	Y. Zhida, Multi-soliton solutions of coupled nonlinear Schrödinger Equations., J. Chinese Physics Letters, 4 (1987), 185-187. Google Scholar
[38]	S. Zhou and X. Cheng, Numerical solution to coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations on unbounded domains, Math. Comput. Simulation, 80 (2010), 2362-2373. doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2010.05.019. Google Scholar

Figure 1. Partition of the plane $ \mathbb{R}^2 $ according to the curves $ \Gamma_{1} $ and $ \Gamma_{2} $ for $ p = 1.5 $ and $ \omega = 2 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2. Partition of the plane $ \mathbb{R}^2 $ according to $ \Gamma_1 $, $ \Gamma_{2} $ and $ \Lambda $ for $ p = 1.5 $ and $ \omega = 2 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3. $ (u,v) $ for $ (a,b) = (0.25,2.75)\in\Omega_1 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4. The solution $ (u,v) $ for $ (a,b) = (1,\omega_3-0.1)\in\Omega_1 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 5. The solutions $ u $ and $ v $ separately for $ (a,b) = (0.25,2.75)\in\Omega_1 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 6. The phase plane portrait $ (u',u) $ for $ (a,b) = (0.25,2.75)\in\Omega_1 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 7. The phase plane portrait $ (v',v) $ for $ (a,b) = (0.25,2.75)\in\Omega_1 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 8. The partition of $ \Omega_2 $ according to the curve $ \Lambda $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 9. The solution $ (u,v) $ for $ (a,b) = (0.45,0.95)\in\Omega_2^1 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 10. The solution $ (u,v) $ for $ (a,b) = (0.5,0.75)\in\Omega_2^1 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 11. The solution $ (u,v) $ for $ (a,b) = (0.4,0.5)\in\Omega_2^1 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 12. The solutions $ u $ an $ v $ separately for $ (a,b) = (0.45,0.5)\in\Omega_2^1 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 13. The solution $ (u,v) $ for $ p = 2 $, $ \omega = 2 $ and $ (a,b) = (2.5,4)\in\Omega_{ext,1} $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 14. The solution $ (u,v) $ for $ p = 2 $, $ \omega = 2 $ and $ (a,b) = (1,6.5)\in\Omega_{ext,1} $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 15. The solutions $ u $ and $ v $ separately for $ p = 2 $, $ \omega = 2 $ and $ (a,b) = (0.5,5)\in\Omega_{ext,1} $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 16. The solution $ u $ and $ v $ separately for $ p = 2 $, $ \omega = 2 $ and $ (a,b) = (3.5,4)\in\Omega_{ext,1} $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 17. The solution $ (u,v) $ for $ p = 1.5 $, $ \omega = 2 $ and $ (a,b) = (0.5,3.0625)\in)A,B( $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 18. The solution $ (u,v) $ for $ p = 1.5 $, $ \omega = 2 $ and $ (a,b) = (0.9511,1.2)\in)A,B( $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 19. The solutions $ u $ and $ v $ separately for $ p = 1.5 $, $ \omega = 2 $ and $ (a,b) = (0.5,3.0625)\in)A,B( $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 20. The solutions $ u $ and $ v $ separately for $ p = 1.5 $, $ \omega = 2 $ and $ (a,b) = (0.9511,1.2)\in)A,B( $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 21. The solution $ (u,v) $ for $ p = 1.5 $, $ \omega = 2 $ and $ (a,b) = (0.1,1.2976)\in)I,B( $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 22. The solution $ (u,v) $ for $ p = 1.5 $, $ \omega = 2 $ and $ (a,b) = (0.5,1.1371)\in)I,B( $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 23. The solutions $ u $ and $ v $ separately for $ (a,b) = (0.1,1.2976)\in)I,B( $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 24. The chaotic behavior for $ p = 1.5 $, $ w = 2 $ and $ (a,b) = (0.2,0.4) $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 25. The chaotic behavior for $ p = 1.5 $, $ w = 2 $ and $ (a,b) = (2,4) $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 26. The chaotic behavior for $ p = 2.5 $, $ w = 3 $ and $ (a,b) = (0.2,0.14) $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 27. The chaotic behavior for $ p = 2.5 $, $ w = 2 $ and $ (a,b) = (2,4) $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 28. The partition of the plane according to $ \Gamma_1 $, $ \Gamma_2 $ and $ \Lambda $ for $ w = 0 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 29. The solution $ (u,v) $ for $ p = 1.5 $, $ w = 0 $ and $ (a,b) = (0.25,0.5538)\in\Lambda $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 30. The solution $ (u,v) $ for $ p = 1.5 $, $ w = 0 $ and $ (a,b) = (0.25,0.35)\in R_2 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 31. The solution $ (u,v) $ for $ p = 1.5 $, $ w = 0 $ and $ (a,b) = (0.5,1)\in R_1 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 32. The solution $ (u,v) $ for $ p = 1.5 $, $ w = 0 $ and $ (a,b) = (2.5,3.5)\in R_1 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 33. The portrait $ (u',u) $ for $ p = 1.5 $, $ w = 0 $ and $ (a,b) = (0.25,0.5538)\in\Lambda $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 34. The portrait $ (v',v) $ for $ p = 1.5 $, $ w = 0 $ and $ (a,b) = (0.25,0.35)\in R_2 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 35. The solutions $ u $ (in blue) and $ v $ (in pink) for $ p = 1.5 $, $ w = 0 $ and $ (a,b) = (0.5,1)\in R_1 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 36. The energy $ E(u,v)(x) $ for $ p = 1.5 $, $ (a,b) = (0.15,25)\in R_2 $, $ w = 0 $ at the top and $ w = 2 $ at the bottom

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 37. Parameters' domains for $ p = 1.5 $, $ \omega = 0.5 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 38. Parameters' domains for $ p = 3.5 $, $ \omega = 0.5 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 39. Parameters' domains for $ p = 1.5 $, $ \omega = 1 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 40. Parameters' domains for $ p = 3.5 $, $ \omega = 1 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Table 1. Some illustrative cases of problem (34) for $ p = 1.5 $

Corresponding Figure	Figure 29	Figure 30	Figure 31	Figure 32
$ a $	$ 0.25 $	$ 0.25 $	$ 0.5 $	$ 2.5 $
$ b $	$ 0.5538 $	$ 0.35 $	$ 1 $	$ 3.5 $
Initial value region	$ (a,b)\in\Lambda $	$ (a,b)\in R_2 $	$ (a,b)\in R_1 $	$ (a,b)\in R_1 $

Download as excel

Corresponding Figure	Figure 29	Figure 30	Figure 31	Figure 32
$ a $	$ 0.25 $	$ 0.25 $	$ 0.5 $	$ 2.5 $
$ b $	$ 0.5538 $	$ 0.35 $	$ 1 $	$ 3.5 $
Initial value region	$ (a,b)\in\Lambda $	$ (a,b)\in R_2 $	$ (a,b)\in R_1 $	$ (a,b)\in R_1 $

[1]	Chiun-Chuan Chen, Hung-Yu Chien, Chih-Chiang Huang. A variational approach to three-phase traveling waves for a gradient system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021 doi: 10.3934/dcds.2021055
[2]	Fabio Sperotto Bemfica, Marcelo Mendes Disconzi, Casey Rodriguez, Yuanzhen Shao. Local existence and uniqueness in Sobolev spaces for first-order conformal causal relativistic viscous hydrodynamics. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2021069
[3]	Manil T. Mohan, Arbaz Khan. On the generalized Burgers-Huxley equation: Existence, uniqueness, regularity, global attractors and numerical studies. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (7) : 3943-3988. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020270
[4]	Zhiming Guo, Zhi-Chun Yang, Xingfu Zou. Existence and uniqueness of positive solution to a non-local differential equation with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary condition---A non-monotone case. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2012, 11 (5) : 1825-1838. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2012.11.1825
[5]	Kazuhiro Kurata, Yuki Osada. Variational problems associated with a system of nonlinear Schrödinger equations with three wave interaction. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021 doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021100
[6]	Jesús A. Álvarez López, Ramón Barral Lijó, John Hunton, Hiraku Nozawa, John R. Parker. Chaotic Delone sets. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021, 41 (8) : 3781-3796. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2021016
[7]	Jinyi Sun, Zunwei Fu, Yue Yin, Minghua Yang. Global existence and Gevrey regularity to the Navier-Stokes-Nernst-Planck-Poisson system in critical Besov-Morrey spaces. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (6) : 3409-3425. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020237
[8]	Izumi Takagi, Conghui Zhang. Existence and stability of patterns in a reaction-diffusion-ODE system with hysteresis in non-uniform media. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021, 41 (7) : 3109-3140. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020400
[9]	Harumi Hattori, Aesha Lagha. Global existence and decay rates of the solutions for a chemotaxis system with Lotka-Volterra type model for chemoattractant and repellent. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021 doi: 10.3934/dcds.2021071
[10]	Sergi Simon. Linearised higher variational equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2014, 34 (11) : 4827-4854. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.4827
[11]	Carmen Cortázar, M. García-Huidobro, Pilar Herreros, Satoshi Tanaka. On the uniqueness of solutions of a semilinear equation in an annulus. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2021029
[12]	Ajay Jasra, Kody J. H. Law, Yaxian Xu. Markov chain simulation for multilevel Monte Carlo. Foundations of Data Science, 2021, 3 (1) : 27-47. doi: 10.3934/fods.2021004
[13]	Christopher Bose, Rua Murray. Minimum 'energy' approximations of invariant measures for nonsingular transformations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2006, 14 (3) : 597-615. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.14.597
[14]	Monica Conti, Lorenzo Liverani, Vittorino Pata. A note on the energy transfer in coupled differential systems. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2021042
[15]	F.J. Herranz, J. de Lucas, C. Sardón. Jacobi--Lie systems: Fundamentals and low-dimensional classification. Conference Publications, 2015, 2015 (special) : 605-614. doi: 10.3934/proc.2015.0605
[16]	Lidan Wang, Lihe Wang, Chunqin Zhou. Classification of positive solutions for fully nonlinear elliptic equations in unbounded cylinders. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2021, 20 (3) : 1241-1261. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2021019
[17]	Junichi Minagawa. On the uniqueness of Nash equilibrium in strategic-form games. Journal of Dynamics & Games, 2020, 7 (2) : 97-104. doi: 10.3934/jdg.2020006
[18]	Stefano Bianchini, Paolo Bonicatto. Forward untangling and applications to the uniqueness problem for the continuity equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021, 41 (6) : 2739-2776. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020384
[19]	Burcu Gürbüz. A computational approximation for the solution of retarded functional differential equations and their applications to science and engineering. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021069
[20]	Zhenbing Gong, Yanping Chen, Wenyu Tao. Jump and variational inequalities for averaging operators with variable kernels. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2021045

Impact Factor: 0.263

Tools

Metrics

Other articles
by authors

on AIMS
Riadh Chteoui Abdulrahman F. Aljohani Anouar Ben Mabrouk
on Google Scholar
Riadh Chteoui Abdulrahman F. Aljohani Anouar Ben Mabrouk

Impact Factor: 0.263

Tools

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Impact Factor: 0.263

Tools

Figures and Tables

Impact Factor: 0.263

Tools

Metrics

Other articles
by authors

on AIMS
Riadh Chteoui Abdulrahman F. Aljohani Anouar Ben Mabrouk
on Google Scholar
Riadh Chteoui Abdulrahman F. Aljohani Anouar Ben Mabrouk

[Back to Top]