American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
September  2021, 29(4): 2755-2770. doi: 10.3934/era.2021012

An a posteriori error estimator based on least-squares finite element solutions for viscoelastic fluid flows

Hsueh-Chen Lee 1,, and  Hyesuk Lee 2,

1. 

Center for General Education, Wenzao Ursuline University of Languages, 900 Mintsu 1st Road Kaohsiung, Taiwan
2. 

School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634-0975, USA

* Corresponding author: Hsueh-Chen Lee

†The first author of this article would like to dedicate this article to her advisor Professor Tsu-Fen Chen (1956-2020) who was the main inspiration and guidance in her research in this area

Received  July 2020 Revised  December 2020 Published  September 2021 Early access  February 2021

Fund Project: The first author is supported by the Taiwan MOST grant 107-2115-M-160-001-MY2. The second author is grateful for the financial support provided in part by the US NSF grant DMS-1818842

We present a posteriori error estimator strategies for the least-squares finite element method (LS) to approximate the exponential Phan-Thien-Tanner (PTT) viscoelastic fluid flows. The error estimator provides adaptive mass weights and mesh refinement criteria for improving LS solutions using lower-order basis functions and a small number of elements. We analyze an a priori error estimate for the first-order linearized LS system and show that the estimate is supported by numerical results. The LS approach is numerically tested for a convergence study and then applied to the flow past a slot channel. Numerical results verify that the proposed approach improves numerical solutions and resolves computational difficulties related to the presence of corner singularities and limitations arising from the exorbitant number of unknowns.

Keywords: Least-squares, viscoelastic fluid, adaptive mesh refinement, a posteriori error estimator, transverse slot.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 65N30, 65N50, Secondary: 76A10.
Citation: Hsueh-Chen Lee, Hyesuk Lee. An a posteriori error estimator based on least-squares finite element solutions for viscoelastic fluid flows. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29 (4) : 2755-2770. doi: 10.3934/era.2021012
References:
[1]

J. H. Adler, T. A. Manteuffel, S. F. McCormick, J. W. Nolting, J. W. Ruge and L. Tang, Efficiency based adaptive local refinement for first-order system least-squares formulations, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 33 (2011), 1-24.  doi: 10.1137/100786897.  Google Scholar

[2]

M. A. Alves, P. J. Oliveira and F. T. Pinho, Benchmark solutions for the flow of Oldroyd-B and PTT fluids in planar contractions, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech., 110 (2003), 45-75.  doi: 10.1016/S0377-0257(02)00191-X.  Google Scholar

[3]

R. B. Bird, R. C. Armstrong and O. Hassager, Fluid Mechanics, Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids, Volume 1: Fluid Mechanics, 2nd ed. New York, John Wiley and Sons, 1987. Google Scholar

[4]

Z. Cai and C. R. Westphal, An adaptive mixed least-squares finite element method for viscoelastic fluids of Oldroyd type, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech., 159 (2009), 72-80.  doi: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2009.02.004.  Google Scholar

[5]

T. F. Chen, C. L. Cox, H. C. Lee and K. L. Tung, Least-squares finite element methods for generalized Newtonian and viscoelastic flows, Appl. Numer. Math., 60 (2010), 1024-1040.  doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2010.07.006.  Google Scholar

[6]

T. F. Chen, H. Lee and C. C. Liu, Numerical approximation of the Oldroyd-B model by the weighted least-squares/discontinuous Galerkin method, Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equations, 29 (2013), 531-548.  doi: 10.1002/num.21719.  Google Scholar

[7]

L. L. Ferrás, M. L. Morgado, M. Rebeloc, Gareth H. McKinley and A. M. Afonso, A generalised Phan-Thien-Tanner model, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech., 269 (2019), 88-89.  doi: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2019.06.001.  Google Scholar

[8]

J. Ku and E. J. Park, A posteriori error estimators for the first-order least-squares finite element method, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 235 (2010), 293-300.  doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2010.06.004.  Google Scholar

[9]

H. C. Lee, A nonlinear weighted least-squares finite element method for the Oldroyd-B viscoelastic flow, Appl. Math. Comput., 219 (2012), 421-434.  doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2012.06.036.  Google Scholar

[10]

H. C. Lee, An adaptively refined least-squares finite element method for generalized Newtonian fluid flows using the Carreau model, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 36 (2014), 193-218.  doi: 10.1137/130912682.  Google Scholar

[11]

H. C. Lee, Adaptive weights for mass conservation in a least-squares finite element method, Int. J. Comput. Math., 95 (2018), 20-35.  doi: 10.1080/00207160.2017.1397639.  Google Scholar

[12]

H. C. Lee and T. F. Chen, A nonlinear weighted least-squares finite element method for the Stokes equations, Comput. Math. Appl., 59 (2010), 215-224.  doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2009.08.033.  Google Scholar

[13]

H. C. Lee and T. F. Chen, Adaptive least-squares finite element approximations to Stokes equations, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 280 (2015), 396-412.  doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2014.11.041.  Google Scholar

[14]

H. C. Lee and H. Lee, Numerical simulations of viscoelastic fluid flows past a transverse slot using least-squares finite element methods, J. Sci. Comput., 79 (2019), 369-388.  doi: 10.1007/s10915-018-0856-x.  Google Scholar

[15]

J. L. Liu, Exact a posteriori error analysis of the least squares finite element method, Appl. Math. Comput., 116 (2000), 297-305.  doi: 10.1016/S0096-3003(99)00153-8.  Google Scholar

[16]

N. P. Thien, A nonlinear network viscoelstic model, J. Rheol., 22 (1978), 259-283.  doi: 10.1122/1.549481.  Google Scholar

[17]

N. P. Thien and R. I. Tanner, A new constitutive equation derived from network theory, Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 2 (1977), 353-365.  doi: 10.1016/0377-0257(77)80021-9.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

J. H. Adler, T. A. Manteuffel, S. F. McCormick, J. W. Nolting, J. W. Ruge and L. Tang, Efficiency based adaptive local refinement for first-order system least-squares formulations, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 33 (2011), 1-24.  doi: 10.1137/100786897.  Google Scholar

[2]

M. A. Alves, P. J. Oliveira and F. T. Pinho, Benchmark solutions for the flow of Oldroyd-B and PTT fluids in planar contractions, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech., 110 (2003), 45-75.  doi: 10.1016/S0377-0257(02)00191-X.  Google Scholar

[3]

R. B. Bird, R. C. Armstrong and O. Hassager, Fluid Mechanics, Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids, Volume 1: Fluid Mechanics, 2nd ed. New York, John Wiley and Sons, 1987. Google Scholar

[4]

Z. Cai and C. R. Westphal, An adaptive mixed least-squares finite element method for viscoelastic fluids of Oldroyd type, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech., 159 (2009), 72-80.  doi: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2009.02.004.  Google Scholar

[5]

T. F. Chen, C. L. Cox, H. C. Lee and K. L. Tung, Least-squares finite element methods for generalized Newtonian and viscoelastic flows, Appl. Numer. Math., 60 (2010), 1024-1040.  doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2010.07.006.  Google Scholar

[6]

T. F. Chen, H. Lee and C. C. Liu, Numerical approximation of the Oldroyd-B model by the weighted least-squares/discontinuous Galerkin method, Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equations, 29 (2013), 531-548.  doi: 10.1002/num.21719.  Google Scholar

[7]

L. L. Ferrás, M. L. Morgado, M. Rebeloc, Gareth H. McKinley and A. M. Afonso, A generalised Phan-Thien-Tanner model, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech., 269 (2019), 88-89.  doi: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2019.06.001.  Google Scholar

[8]

J. Ku and E. J. Park, A posteriori error estimators for the first-order least-squares finite element method, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 235 (2010), 293-300.  doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2010.06.004.  Google Scholar

[9]

H. C. Lee, A nonlinear weighted least-squares finite element method for the Oldroyd-B viscoelastic flow, Appl. Math. Comput., 219 (2012), 421-434.  doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2012.06.036.  Google Scholar

[10]

H. C. Lee, An adaptively refined least-squares finite element method for generalized Newtonian fluid flows using the Carreau model, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 36 (2014), 193-218.  doi: 10.1137/130912682.  Google Scholar

[11]

H. C. Lee, Adaptive weights for mass conservation in a least-squares finite element method, Int. J. Comput. Math., 95 (2018), 20-35.  doi: 10.1080/00207160.2017.1397639.  Google Scholar

[12]

H. C. Lee and T. F. Chen, A nonlinear weighted least-squares finite element method for the Stokes equations, Comput. Math. Appl., 59 (2010), 215-224.  doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2009.08.033.  Google Scholar

[13]

H. C. Lee and T. F. Chen, Adaptive least-squares finite element approximations to Stokes equations, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 280 (2015), 396-412.  doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2014.11.041.  Google Scholar

[14]

H. C. Lee and H. Lee, Numerical simulations of viscoelastic fluid flows past a transverse slot using least-squares finite element methods, J. Sci. Comput., 79 (2019), 369-388.  doi: 10.1007/s10915-018-0856-x.  Google Scholar

[15]

J. L. Liu, Exact a posteriori error analysis of the least squares finite element method, Appl. Math. Comput., 116 (2000), 297-305.  doi: 10.1016/S0096-3003(99)00153-8.  Google Scholar

[16]

N. P. Thien, A nonlinear network viscoelstic model, J. Rheol., 22 (1978), 259-283.  doi: 10.1122/1.549481.  Google Scholar

[17]

N. P. Thien and R. I. Tanner, A new constitutive equation derived from network theory, Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 2 (1977), 353-365.  doi: 10.1016/0377-0257(77)80021-9.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  Reduction of the functional norm $ \delta g^{1/2}_{m} $ on three meshes for various weights $ W_2 = 10^{m} $ ($ 2 \le m \le 6 $)
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2.  $ L^{2} $ errors of $ {\boldsymbol \tau} $, $ {\boldsymbol \sigma} $, $ {p} $, $ H^{1} $ error in $ {\bf u} $, and $ g^{1/2} $ functional norm of the LS solutions for (a) $ W_2 = 10^{2} $ and (b) $ W_2 = 10^{6} $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3.  The slot channel with $ d = h = l = 1 $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4.  $ \Delta g^{1/2}_{(k)}/\Delta N_{k} = |g^{1/2}_{(k)}-g^{1/2}_{(k-1)}|/|N_{k}-N_{k-1}| $ versus the number of elements $ N_{k} $ for $ k = $1, 2, and 3, where $ g^{1/2}_{(k)} $ denotes the functional value by $ N_{k} $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 5.  Mesh G with various number of elements $ N_k $ in refinement steps
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 6.  The LS solutions using $ W_2 = 10^{6} $ on the uniformly refined Mesh U with 6144 elements. Reduction of functional norm $ \delta g^{1/2}_{m} $ and $ u(2.5,0.5) $ for various weights $ W_2 = 10^{m} $ ($ 2 \le m \le 6) $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 7.  Streamlines of LS solutions on the refined Mesh U with 6144 elements using (a) $ W_2 = 10^{4} $ and (b) $ W_2 = 10^{6} $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 8.  LS solutions at $ Re = 1 $, $ We = 0.1 $, and $ \epsilon = 0.5 $ using $ W_2 = 10^{6} $. (a) Grid independence results for $ g^{1/2} $. (b) Convergence of $ g^{1/2} $ by the LS and ALS methods
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 9.  Plots of $ g^{1/2}_e $ on (a) the initial Mesh T with 1536 elements, (b) the uniformly refined Mesh U with 24576 elements, and (c) the adaptive Mesh G with 12993 elements
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 10.  Plots of $ g^{1/2}_e $ on (a) the initial Mesh S with 384 elements and (b) the adaptive Mesh H with 18320 elements at the 5-th refinement step
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 11.  Streamlines of the flow over a slot by the ALS method for (a) the exponential PTT ($ a = 1 $), (b) the linear PTT ($ a = 0 $), and (c) the Oldroyd-B ($ \epsilon = 0 $) models at $ We = 1 $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Table 1.  Viscoelastic fluid models for $ (a,\ We,\ \beta,\ \epsilon) $
Constitutive equation $ a $ $ We $ $ \beta $ $ \epsilon $
Newtonian 0 0 $ \beta $ 0
Upper Convected Maxwell 0 $ We $ 0 0
Oldroyd-B 0 $ We $ $ \beta $ 0
Linear PTT 0 $ We $ $ \beta $ $ \epsilon $
Exponential PTT 1 $ We $ $ \beta $ $ \epsilon $
Table Options

Download as excel

Constitutive equation $ a $ $ We $ $ \beta $ $ \epsilon $
Newtonian 0 0 $ \beta $ 0
Upper Convected Maxwell 0 $ We $ 0 0
Oldroyd-B 0 $ We $ $ \beta $ 0
Linear PTT 0 $ We $ $ \beta $ $ \epsilon $
Exponential PTT 1 $ We $ $ \beta $ $ \epsilon $
Table 2.  Meshes considered for $ (We,\ \epsilon,\ Re) $ = $ (0.1,\ 0.5,\ 1) $
Mesh Type Method $ N_k ^{a}$ $ S ^{b}$ $ k ^{c}$
Mesh S Initial uniform grids LS 348 4 –
Mesh T Initial uniform grids LS 1536 4 –
Mesh U Uniform refined grids with Mesh T LS 24576 5 2
Mesh G Adaptive grids by $ {\boldsymbol g^{1/2}} $ with Mesh T ALS 12993 4 3
Mesh H Adaptive grids by $ {\boldsymbol g^{1/2}} $ with Mesh S ALS 18320 4 5
aNk represents the number of elements at the k refinement step.
b S is the number of Newton steps for convergence.
c k is the number of mesh refinements.
Table Options

Download as excel

Mesh Type Method $ N_k ^{a}$ $ S ^{b}$ $ k ^{c}$
Mesh S Initial uniform grids LS 348 4 –
Mesh T Initial uniform grids LS 1536 4 –
Mesh U Uniform refined grids with Mesh T LS 24576 5 2
Mesh G Adaptive grids by $ {\boldsymbol g^{1/2}} $ with Mesh T ALS 12993 4 3
Mesh H Adaptive grids by $ {\boldsymbol g^{1/2}} $ with Mesh S ALS 18320 4 5
aNk represents the number of elements at the k refinement step.
b S is the number of Newton steps for convergence.
c k is the number of mesh refinements.
[1]

Peter Frolkovič, Karol Mikula, Jooyoung Hahn, Dirk Martin, Branislav Basara. Flux balanced approximation with least-squares gradient for diffusion equation on polyhedral mesh. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (3) : 865-879. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020350
[2]

JaEun Ku. Maximum norm error estimates for Div least-squares method for Darcy flows. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2010, 26 (4) : 1305-1318. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.26.1305
[3]

Nahid Banihashemi, C. Yalçın Kaya. Inexact restoration and adaptive mesh refinement for optimal control. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2014, 10 (2) : 521-542. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2014.10.521
[4]

Hassan Mohammad, Mohammed Yusuf Waziri, Sandra Augusta Santos. A brief survey of methods for solving nonlinear least-squares problems. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2019, 9 (1) : 1-13. doi: 10.3934/naco.2019001
[5]

Mila Nikolova. Analytical bounds on the minimizers of (nonconvex) regularized least-squares. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2008, 2 (1) : 133-149. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2008.2.133
[6]

Luís Tiago Paiva, Fernando A. C. C. Fontes. Adaptive time--mesh refinement in optimal control problems with state constraints. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2015, 35 (9) : 4553-4572. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.4553
[7]

Lucian Coroianu, Danilo Costarelli, Sorin G. Gal, Gianluca Vinti. Approximation by multivariate max-product Kantorovich-type operators and learning rates of least-squares regularized regression. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (8) : 4213-4225. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020189
[8]

H. D. Scolnik, N. E. Echebest, M. T. Guardarucci. Extensions of incomplete oblique projections method for solving rank-deficient least-squares problems. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2009, 5 (2) : 175-191. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2009.5.175
[9]

Runchang Lin, Huiqing Zhu. A discontinuous Galerkin least-squares finite element method for solving Fisher's equation. Conference Publications, 2013, 2013 (special) : 489-497. doi: 10.3934/proc.2013.2013.489
[10]

Luís Tiago Paiva, Fernando A. C. C. Fontes. Sampled–data model predictive control: Adaptive time–mesh refinement algorithms and guarantees of stability. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (5) : 2335-2364. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019098
[11]

Zhou Sheng, Gonglin Yuan, Zengru Cui, Xiabin Duan, Xiaoliang Wang. An adaptive trust region algorithm for large-residual nonsmooth least squares problems. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (2) : 707-718. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017070
[12]

Hatim Tayeq, Amal Bergam, Anouar El Harrak, Kenza Khomsi. Self-adaptive algorithm based on a posteriori analysis of the error applied to air quality forecasting using the finite volume method. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (7) : 2557-2570. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020400
[13]

Zhuoyi Xu, Yong Xia, Deren Han. On box-constrained total least squares problem. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2020, 10 (4) : 439-449. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020043
[14]

Xiao-Wen Chang, David Titley-Peloquin. An improved algorithm for generalized least squares estimation. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2020, 10 (4) : 451-461. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020044
[15]

Benedict Geihe, Martin Rumpf. A posteriori error estimates for sequential laminates in shape optimization. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2016, 9 (5) : 1377-1392. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016055
[16]

Walter Allegretto, Yanping Lin, Ningning Yan. A posteriori error analysis for FEM of American options. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2006, 6 (5) : 957-978. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2006.6.957
[17]

Prabhat Mishra, Vikas Gupta, Ritesh Kumar Dubey. A mesh adaptation algorithm using new monitor and estimator function for discontinuous and layered solution. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/naco.2021029
[18]

Ya-Xiang Yuan. Recent advances in numerical methods for nonlinear equations and nonlinear least squares. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2011, 1 (1) : 15-34. doi: 10.3934/naco.2011.1.15
[19]

Yanqing Liu, Jiyuan Tao, Huan Zhang, Xianchao Xiu, Lingchen Kong. Fused LASSO penalized least absolute deviation estimator for high dimensional linear regression. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2018, 8 (1) : 97-117. doi: 10.3934/naco.2018006
[20]

Zheng-Ru Zhang, Tao Tang. An adaptive mesh redistribution algorithm for convection-dominated problems. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2002, 1 (3) : 341-357. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2002.1.341

2020 Impact Factor: 1.833

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (168)
  • HTML views (390)
  • Cited by (0)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2022 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences | Privacy Policy