American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
doi: 10.3934/fods.2021020
Online First

Online First articles are published articles within a journal that have not yet been assigned to a formal issue. This means they do not yet have a volume number, issue number, or page numbers assigned to them, however, they can still be found and cited using their DOI (Digital Object Identifier). Online First publication benefits the research community by making new scientific discoveries known as quickly as possible.

Readers can access Online First articles via the “Online First” tab for the selected journal.

Learning landmark geodesics using the ensemble Kalman filter

Andreas Bock , and  Colin J. Cotter

Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK

* Corresponding author: Andreas Bock

Received  March 2021 Revised  July 2021 Early access August 2021

We study the problem of diffeomorphometric geodesic landmark matching where the objective is to find a diffeomorphism that, via its group action, maps between two sets of landmarks. It is well-known that the motion of the landmarks, and thereby the diffeomorphism, can be encoded by an initial momentum leading to a formulation where the landmark matching problem can be solved as an optimisation problem over such momenta. The novelty of our work lies in the application of a derivative-free Bayesian inverse method for learning the optimal momentum encoding the diffeomorphic mapping between the template and the target. The method we apply is the ensemble Kalman filter, an extension of the Kalman filter to nonlinear operators. We describe an efficient implementation of the algorithm and show several numerical results for various target shapes.

Keywords: Ensemble Kalman filter, large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping, Bayesian inverse problem, landmark matching, derivative-free optimisation.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 62F15, 65C05; Secondary: 34A55.
Citation: Andreas Bock, Colin J. Cotter. Learning landmark geodesics using the ensemble Kalman filter. Foundations of Data Science, doi: 10.3934/fods.2021020
References:
[1]

M. F. Beg, M. I. Miller, A. Trouvé and L. Younes, Computing large deformation metric mappings via geodesic flows of diffeomorphisms, Int. J. Comput. Vis., 61 (2005), 139-157.  doi: 10.1023/B:VISI.0000043755.93987.aa.  Google Scholar

[2]

N. K. Chada, M. A. Iglesias, L. Roininen and A. M. Stuart, Parameterizations for ensemble Kalman inversion, Inverse Problems, 34 (2018), 31pp. doi: 10.1088/1361-6420/aab6d9.  Google Scholar

[3]

B. Charlier, J. Feydy, J. A. Glaunès, F.-D. Collin and G. Durif, Kernel operations on the GPU, with autodiff, without memory overflows, preprint, arXiv: 2004.11127. Google Scholar

[4]

C. J. Cotter, S. L. Cotter and F.-X. Vialard, Bayesian data assimilation in shape registration, Inverse Problems, 29 (2013), 21pp. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/29/4/045011.  Google Scholar

[5]

S. L. Cotter, M. Dashti and A. M. Stuart, Approximation of Bayesian inverse problems for PDEs, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 48 (2010), 322-345.  doi: 10.1137/090770734.  Google Scholar

[6]

P. Dupuis, U. Grenander and M. I. Miller, Variational problems on flows of diffeomorphisms for image matching, Quart. Appl. Math., 56 (1998), 587-600.  doi: 10.1090/qam/1632326.  Google Scholar

[7]

G. Evensen, Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi-geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 99 (1994), 10143-10162.  doi: 10.1029/94JC00572.  Google Scholar

[8]

U. Grenander and M. I. Miller, Computational anatomy: An emerging discipline, Quart. Appl. Math., 56 (1998), 617-694.  doi: 10.1090/qam/1668732.  Google Scholar

[9]

U. Grenander and M. I. Miller, Representations of knowledge in complex systems, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B, 56 (1994), 549-603.  doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1994.tb02000.x.  Google Scholar

[10]

S. J. Greybush, E. Kalnay, T. Miyoshi, K. Ide and B. R. Hunt, Balance and ensemble Kalman filter localization techniques, Monthly Weather Review, 139 (2011), 511-522.  doi: 10.1175/2010MWR3328.1.  Google Scholar

[11]

D. D. Holm, A. Trouvé and L. Younes, The Euler-Poincaré theory of metamorphosis, Quart. Appl. Math., 67 (2009), 661-685.  doi: 10.1090/S0033-569X-09-01134-2.  Google Scholar

[12]

M. A. Iglesias, A regularizing iterative ensemble Kalman method for PDE-constrained inverse problems, Inverse Problems, 32 (2016), 45pp. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/32/2/025002.  Google Scholar

[13]

M. A. Iglesias, K. J. H. Law and A. M. Stuart, Ensemble Kalman methods for inverse problems, Inverse Problems, 29 (2013), 20pp. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/29/4/045001.  Google Scholar

[14]

S. C. Joshi and M. I. Miller, Landmark matching via large deformation diffeomorphisms, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 9 (2000), 1357-1370.  doi: 10.1109/83.855431.  Google Scholar

[15]

J. Kaipio and E. Somersalo, Statistical and Computational Inverse Problems, Applied Mathematical Sciences, 160, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2005. doi: 10.1007/b138659.  Google Scholar

[16]

R. E. Kalman, A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems, Trans. ASME Ser. D. J. Basic Engrg., 82 (1960), 35-45.  doi: 10.1115/1.3662552.  Google Scholar

[17]

L. Kühnel, S. Sommer and A. Arnaudon, Differential geometry and stochastic dynamics with deep learning numerics, Appl. Math. Comput., 356 (2019), 411-437.  doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2019.03.044.  Google Scholar

[18]

F. Le Gland, V. Monbet and V.-D. Tran, Large sample asymptotics for the ensemble Kalman filter, in The Oxford Handbook of Nonlinear Filtering, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2011, 598-631.  Google Scholar

[19]

J. Ma, M. I. Miller, A. Trouvé and L. Younes, Bayesian template estimation in computational anatomy, NeuroImage, 42 (2008), 252-261.  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.056.  Google Scholar

[20]

J. Mandel, L. Cobb and J. D. Beezley, On the convergence of the ensemble Kalman filter, Appl. Math., 56 (2011), 533-541.  doi: 10.1007/s10492-011-0031-2.  Google Scholar

[21]

M. I. Miller, A. Trouvé and L. Younes, Geodesic shooting for computational anatomy, J. Math. Imaging Vision, 24 (2006), 209-228.  doi: 10.1007/s10851-005-3624-0.  Google Scholar

[22]

D. Mumford, Pattern theory: The mathematics of perception, in Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Vol. I, Higher Ed. Press, Beijing, 2002,401-422.  Google Scholar

[23] D. S. Oliver, A. C. Reynolds and N. Liu, Inverse Theory for Petroleum Reservoir Characterization and History Matching, Cambridge University Press, 2008.  doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511535642.  Google Scholar
[24]

A. Paszke, S. Gross, F. Massa, A. Lerer and J. Bradbury, et al., PyTorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library, preprint, arXiv: 1912.01703 Google Scholar

[25] S. Reich and C. Cotter, Probabilistic Forecasting and Bayesian Data Assimilation, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2015.  doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107706804.  Google Scholar
[26]

Y. Saad and M. H. Schultz, GMRES: A generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems, SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Comput., 7 (1986), 856-869.  doi: 10.1137/0907058.  Google Scholar

[27]

C. Schillings and A. M. Stuart, Analysis of the ensemble Kalman filter for inverse problems, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 55 (2017), 1264-1290.  doi: 10.1137/16M105959X.  Google Scholar

[28]

T. Schneider, S. Lan, A. Stuart and J. Teixeira, Earth system modeling 2.0: A blueprint for models that learn from observations and targeted high-resolution simulations, Geophysical Research Letters, 44 (2017), 12396-12417.  doi: 10.1002/2017GL076101.  Google Scholar

[29]

A. M. Stuart, Inverse problems: A Bayesian perspective, Acta Numer., 19 (2010), 451-559.  doi: 10.1017/S0962492910000061.  Google Scholar

[30]

A. Trouvé, Diffeomorphisms groups and pattern matching in image analysis, Int. J. Comput. Vis., 28 (1998), 213-221.  doi: 10.1023/A:1008001603737.  Google Scholar

[31]

A. Trouvé, An infinite dimensional group approach for physics based models in pattern recognition, (1995). Google Scholar

[32]

A. Trouvé and L. Younes, Metamorphoses through Lie group action, Found. Comput. Math., 5 (2005), 173-198.  doi: 10.1007/s10208-004-0128-z.  Google Scholar

[33]

R. Van Der Merwe, A. Doucet, N. De Freitas and E. A. Wan, The unscented particle filter, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2000,584–590. Google Scholar

[34]

C. R. Vogel, Computational Methods for Inverse Problems, Frontiers in Applied Mathematics, 23, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA, 2002. doi: 10.1137/1.9780898717570.  Google Scholar

[35]

L. Younes, Shapes and Diffeomorphisms, Applied Mathematical Sciences, 171, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2010 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-12055-8.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

M. F. Beg, M. I. Miller, A. Trouvé and L. Younes, Computing large deformation metric mappings via geodesic flows of diffeomorphisms, Int. J. Comput. Vis., 61 (2005), 139-157.  doi: 10.1023/B:VISI.0000043755.93987.aa.  Google Scholar

[2]

N. K. Chada, M. A. Iglesias, L. Roininen and A. M. Stuart, Parameterizations for ensemble Kalman inversion, Inverse Problems, 34 (2018), 31pp. doi: 10.1088/1361-6420/aab6d9.  Google Scholar

[3]

B. Charlier, J. Feydy, J. A. Glaunès, F.-D. Collin and G. Durif, Kernel operations on the GPU, with autodiff, without memory overflows, preprint, arXiv: 2004.11127. Google Scholar

[4]

C. J. Cotter, S. L. Cotter and F.-X. Vialard, Bayesian data assimilation in shape registration, Inverse Problems, 29 (2013), 21pp. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/29/4/045011.  Google Scholar

[5]

S. L. Cotter, M. Dashti and A. M. Stuart, Approximation of Bayesian inverse problems for PDEs, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 48 (2010), 322-345.  doi: 10.1137/090770734.  Google Scholar

[6]

P. Dupuis, U. Grenander and M. I. Miller, Variational problems on flows of diffeomorphisms for image matching, Quart. Appl. Math., 56 (1998), 587-600.  doi: 10.1090/qam/1632326.  Google Scholar

[7]

G. Evensen, Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi-geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 99 (1994), 10143-10162.  doi: 10.1029/94JC00572.  Google Scholar

[8]

U. Grenander and M. I. Miller, Computational anatomy: An emerging discipline, Quart. Appl. Math., 56 (1998), 617-694.  doi: 10.1090/qam/1668732.  Google Scholar

[9]

U. Grenander and M. I. Miller, Representations of knowledge in complex systems, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B, 56 (1994), 549-603.  doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1994.tb02000.x.  Google Scholar

[10]

S. J. Greybush, E. Kalnay, T. Miyoshi, K. Ide and B. R. Hunt, Balance and ensemble Kalman filter localization techniques, Monthly Weather Review, 139 (2011), 511-522.  doi: 10.1175/2010MWR3328.1.  Google Scholar

[11]

D. D. Holm, A. Trouvé and L. Younes, The Euler-Poincaré theory of metamorphosis, Quart. Appl. Math., 67 (2009), 661-685.  doi: 10.1090/S0033-569X-09-01134-2.  Google Scholar

[12]

M. A. Iglesias, A regularizing iterative ensemble Kalman method for PDE-constrained inverse problems, Inverse Problems, 32 (2016), 45pp. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/32/2/025002.  Google Scholar

[13]

M. A. Iglesias, K. J. H. Law and A. M. Stuart, Ensemble Kalman methods for inverse problems, Inverse Problems, 29 (2013), 20pp. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/29/4/045001.  Google Scholar

[14]

S. C. Joshi and M. I. Miller, Landmark matching via large deformation diffeomorphisms, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 9 (2000), 1357-1370.  doi: 10.1109/83.855431.  Google Scholar

[15]

J. Kaipio and E. Somersalo, Statistical and Computational Inverse Problems, Applied Mathematical Sciences, 160, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2005. doi: 10.1007/b138659.  Google Scholar

[16]

R. E. Kalman, A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems, Trans. ASME Ser. D. J. Basic Engrg., 82 (1960), 35-45.  doi: 10.1115/1.3662552.  Google Scholar

[17]

L. Kühnel, S. Sommer and A. Arnaudon, Differential geometry and stochastic dynamics with deep learning numerics, Appl. Math. Comput., 356 (2019), 411-437.  doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2019.03.044.  Google Scholar

[18]

F. Le Gland, V. Monbet and V.-D. Tran, Large sample asymptotics for the ensemble Kalman filter, in The Oxford Handbook of Nonlinear Filtering, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2011, 598-631.  Google Scholar

[19]

J. Ma, M. I. Miller, A. Trouvé and L. Younes, Bayesian template estimation in computational anatomy, NeuroImage, 42 (2008), 252-261.  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.056.  Google Scholar

[20]

J. Mandel, L. Cobb and J. D. Beezley, On the convergence of the ensemble Kalman filter, Appl. Math., 56 (2011), 533-541.  doi: 10.1007/s10492-011-0031-2.  Google Scholar

[21]

M. I. Miller, A. Trouvé and L. Younes, Geodesic shooting for computational anatomy, J. Math. Imaging Vision, 24 (2006), 209-228.  doi: 10.1007/s10851-005-3624-0.  Google Scholar

[22]

D. Mumford, Pattern theory: The mathematics of perception, in Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Vol. I, Higher Ed. Press, Beijing, 2002,401-422.  Google Scholar

[23] D. S. Oliver, A. C. Reynolds and N. Liu, Inverse Theory for Petroleum Reservoir Characterization and History Matching, Cambridge University Press, 2008.  doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511535642.  Google Scholar
[24]

A. Paszke, S. Gross, F. Massa, A. Lerer and J. Bradbury, et al., PyTorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library, preprint, arXiv: 1912.01703 Google Scholar

[25] S. Reich and C. Cotter, Probabilistic Forecasting and Bayesian Data Assimilation, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2015.  doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107706804.  Google Scholar
[26]

Y. Saad and M. H. Schultz, GMRES: A generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems, SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Comput., 7 (1986), 856-869.  doi: 10.1137/0907058.  Google Scholar

[27]

C. Schillings and A. M. Stuart, Analysis of the ensemble Kalman filter for inverse problems, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 55 (2017), 1264-1290.  doi: 10.1137/16M105959X.  Google Scholar

[28]

T. Schneider, S. Lan, A. Stuart and J. Teixeira, Earth system modeling 2.0: A blueprint for models that learn from observations and targeted high-resolution simulations, Geophysical Research Letters, 44 (2017), 12396-12417.  doi: 10.1002/2017GL076101.  Google Scholar

[29]

A. M. Stuart, Inverse problems: A Bayesian perspective, Acta Numer., 19 (2010), 451-559.  doi: 10.1017/S0962492910000061.  Google Scholar

[30]

A. Trouvé, Diffeomorphisms groups and pattern matching in image analysis, Int. J. Comput. Vis., 28 (1998), 213-221.  doi: 10.1023/A:1008001603737.  Google Scholar

[31]

A. Trouvé, An infinite dimensional group approach for physics based models in pattern recognition, (1995). Google Scholar

[32]

A. Trouvé and L. Younes, Metamorphoses through Lie group action, Found. Comput. Math., 5 (2005), 173-198.  doi: 10.1007/s10208-004-0128-z.  Google Scholar

[33]

R. Van Der Merwe, A. Doucet, N. De Freitas and E. A. Wan, The unscented particle filter, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2000,584–590. Google Scholar

[34]

C. R. Vogel, Computational Methods for Inverse Problems, Frontiers in Applied Mathematics, 23, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA, 2002. doi: 10.1137/1.9780898717570.  Google Scholar

[35]

L. Younes, Shapes and Diffeomorphisms, Applied Mathematical Sciences, 171, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2010 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-12055-8.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  A matching between landmarks where the geodesics are shown
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2.  Template-target configurations for different values of $ M $. Left to right: 10, 50, 150. Linear interpolation has been used between the landmarks to improve the visualisation
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3.  Log data misfits for $ M = N_E = 50 $ for different values of $ \xi $ using three different targets
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4.  Progression of Algorithm 1 for various targets using $ M = 10 $ and $ N_E = 10 $. Computation times for 50 iterations: 6s for each configuration
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 5.  Progression of Algorithm 1 for various targets using $M = 50$ and $N_E = 50$. Computation times for 50 iterations (top to bottom): 2m8s, 2m9s, 1m29s
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 6.  Progression of Algorithm 1 for various targets using $ M = 150 $ and $ N_E = 100 $. Computation times for 50 iterations (top to bottom): 5m22s, 5m23s, 5m23s
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 7.  Convergence of $ E^k $ where $ M = 10 $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 8.  Convergence of $ E^k $ where $ M = 50 $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 9.  Convergence of $ E^k $ where $ M = 150 $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 7 where $ M = 10 $">Figure 10.  Evolution of the relative error $ \mathcal{R}^k $ corresponding to the misfits in Figure 7 where $ M = 10 $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 8 where $ M = 150 $">Figure 11.  Evolution of the relative error $ \mathcal{R}^k $ corresponding to the misfits in Figure 8 where $ M = 150 $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 9 where $ M = 50 $">Figure 12.  Evolution of the relative error $ \mathcal{R}^k $ corresponding to the misfits in Figure 9 where $ M = 50 $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Table 1.  Global parameters used for Algorithm 1
Variable Value Description
$ n $ 50 Kalman iterations
$ T $ 15 time steps
$ \tau $ 1 landmark size (cf. (2))
$ \epsilon $ 1e-05 absolute error tolerance
Table Options

Download as excel

Variable Value Description
$ n $ 50 Kalman iterations
$ T $ 15 time steps
$ \tau $ 1 landmark size (cf. (2))
$ \epsilon $ 1e-05 absolute error tolerance
Table 2.  Relative error at the last iteration of algorithm 1 for different values of $ N_E $ for fixed $ M = 10 $. The rows correspond to the configurations in Figure 4
Table Options

Download as excel

Table 3.  Relative error at the last iteration of algorithm 1 for different values of $ N_E $ for fixed $ M = 50 $. The rows correspond to the configurations in Figure 5
Table Options

Download as excel

Table 4.  Relative error at the last iteration of algorithm 1 for different values of $ N_E $ for fixed $ M = 150 $. The rows correspond to the configurations in Figure 6
Table Options

Download as excel

[1]

Min Xi, Wenyu Sun, Jun Chen. Survey of derivative-free optimization. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2020, 10 (4) : 537-555. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020050
[2]

Gaohang Yu. A derivative-free method for solving large-scale nonlinear systems of equations. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2010, 6 (1) : 149-160. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2010.6.149
[3]

Yigui Ou, Wenjie Xu. A unified derivative-free projection method model for large-scale nonlinear equations with convex constraints. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021125
[4]

Junyoung Jang, Kihoon Jang, Hee-Dae Kwon, Jeehyun Lee. Feedback control of an HBV model based on ensemble kalman filter and differential evolution. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2018, 15 (3) : 667-691. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018030
[5]

Jiangqi Wu, Linjie Wen, Jinglai Li. Resampled ensemble Kalman inversion for Bayesian parameter estimation with sequential data. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2021045
[6]

A. M. Bagirov, Moumita Ghosh, Dean Webb. A derivative-free method for linearly constrained nonsmooth optimization. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2006, 2 (3) : 319-338. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2006.2.319
[7]

Wei-Zhe Gu, Li-Yong Lu. The linear convergence of a derivative-free descent method for nonlinear complementarity problems. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (2) : 531-548. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016030
[8]

Liang Zhang, Wenyu Sun, Raimundo J. B. de Sampaio, Jinyun Yuan. A wedge trust region method with self-correcting geometry for derivative-free optimization. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2015, 5 (2) : 169-184. doi: 10.3934/naco.2015.5.169
[9]

Dong-Hui Li, Xiao-Lin Wang. A modified Fletcher-Reeves-Type derivative-free method for symmetric nonlinear equations. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2011, 1 (1) : 71-82. doi: 10.3934/naco.2011.1.71
[10]

Jun Takaki, Nobuo Yamashita. A derivative-free trust-region algorithm for unconstrained optimization with controlled error. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2011, 1 (1) : 117-145. doi: 10.3934/naco.2011.1.117
[11]

Alexander Bibov, Heikki Haario, Antti Solonen. Stabilized BFGS approximate Kalman filter. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2015, 9 (4) : 1003-1024. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2015.9.1003
[12]

Russell Johnson, Carmen Núñez. The Kalman-Bucy filter revisited. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2014, 34 (10) : 4139-4153. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.4139
[13]

Sebastian Reich, Seoleun Shin. On the consistency of ensemble transform filter formulations. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2014, 1 (1) : 177-189. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2014.1.177
[14]

Fabrizio Colombo, Irene Sabadini, Frank Sommen. The inverse Fueter mapping theorem. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2011, 10 (4) : 1165-1181. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2011.10.1165
[15]

Jiangfeng Huang, Zhiliang Deng, Liwei Xu. A Bayesian level set method for an inverse medium scattering problem in acoustics. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2021, 15 (5) : 1077-1097. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2021029
[16]

Neil K. Chada, Claudia Schillings, Simon Weissmann. On the incorporation of box-constraints for ensemble Kalman inversion. Foundations of Data Science, 2019, 1 (4) : 433-456. doi: 10.3934/fods.2019018
[17]

Marc Bocquet, Alban Farchi, Quentin Malartic. Online learning of both state and dynamics using ensemble Kalman filters. Foundations of Data Science, 2020  doi: 10.3934/fods.2020015
[18]

Zhiyan Ding, Qin Li, Jianfeng Lu. Ensemble Kalman Inversion for nonlinear problems: Weights, consistency, and variance bounds. Foundations of Data Science, 2020  doi: 10.3934/fods.2020018
[19]

Håkon Hoel, Gaukhar Shaimerdenova, Raúl Tempone. Multilevel Ensemble Kalman Filtering based on a sample average of independent EnKF estimators. Foundations of Data Science, 2020, 2 (4) : 351-390. doi: 10.3934/fods.2020017
[20]

Neil K. Chada, Yuming Chen, Daniel Sanz-Alonso. Iterative ensemble Kalman methods: A unified perspective with some new variants. Foundations of Data Science, 2021  doi: 10.3934/fods.2021011

 Impact Factor: 

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (56)
  • HTML views (64)
  • Cited by (0)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2021 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences