May  2007, 1(2): 399-422. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2007.1.399

Model distortions in Bayesian MAP reconstruction

1. 

CMLA, ENS Cachan, CNRS, PRES UniverSud, 61 Av. President Wilson, F-94230 Cachan, France

Received  December 2006 Published  April 2007

The Bayesian approach and especially the maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimator is most widely used to solve various problems in signal and image processing, such as denoising and deblurring, zooming, and reconstruction. The reason is that it provides a coherent statistical framework to combine observed (noisy) data with prior information on the unknown signal or image which is optimal in a precise statistical sense. This paper presents an objective critical analysis of the MAP approach. It shows that the MAP solutions substantially deviate from both the data-acquisition model and the prior model that underly the MAP estimator. This is explained theoretically using several analytical properties of the MAP solutions and is illustrated using examples and experiments. It follows that the MAP approach is not relevant in the applications where the data-observation and the prior models are accurate. The construction of solutions (estimators) that respect simultaneously two such models remains an open question.
Citation: Mila Nikolova. Model distortions in Bayesian MAP reconstruction. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2007, 1 (2) : 399-422. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2007.1.399
[1]

Rafael Luís, Sandra Mendonça. A note on global stability in the periodic logistic map. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020, 25 (11) : 4211-4220. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020094

[2]

Jia Cai, Guanglong Xu, Zhensheng Hu. Sketch-based image retrieval via CAT loss with elastic net regularization. Mathematical Foundations of Computing, 2020, 3 (4) : 219-227. doi: 10.3934/mfc.2020013

[3]

Baba Issa Camara, Houda Mokrani, Evans K. Afenya. Mathematical modeling of glioma therapy using oncolytic viruses. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2013, 10 (3) : 565-578. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.565

[4]

Eduardo Casas, Christian Clason, Arnd Rösch. Preface special issue on system modeling and optimization. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2021  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2021008

[5]

Ronald E. Mickens. Positivity preserving discrete model for the coupled ODE's modeling glycolysis. Conference Publications, 2003, 2003 (Special) : 623-629. doi: 10.3934/proc.2003.2003.623

[6]

Xu Zhang, Xiang Li. Modeling and identification of dynamical system with Genetic Regulation in batch fermentation of glycerol. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2015, 5 (4) : 393-403. doi: 10.3934/naco.2015.5.393

[7]

Brandy Rapatski, James Yorke. Modeling HIV outbreaks: The male to female prevalence ratio in the core population. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2009, 6 (1) : 135-143. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2009.6.135

[8]

Christina Surulescu, Nicolae Surulescu. Modeling and simulation of some cell dispersion problems by a nonparametric method. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2011, 8 (2) : 263-277. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.263

[9]

Andrey Kovtanyuk, Alexander Chebotarev, Nikolai Botkin, Varvara Turova, Irina Sidorenko, Renée Lampe. Modeling the pressure distribution in a spatially averaged cerebral capillary network. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2021  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2021016

2019 Impact Factor: 1.373

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (101)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (22)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]