American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
February  2014, 8(1): 173-197. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2014.8.173

Geometric reconstruction in bioluminescence tomography

Tim Kreutzmann 1, and  Andreas Rieder 1,

1. 

Fakultät für Mathematik, Institut für Angewandte und Numerische Mathematik, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT), D-76128 Karlsruhe, Germany, Germany

Received  March 2012 Revised  July 2013 Published  March 2014

In bioluminescence tomography the location as well as the radiation intensity of a photon source (marked cell clusters) inside an organism have to be determined given the outside photon count. This inverse source problem is ill-posed: it suffers not only from strong instability but also from non-uniqueness. To cope with these difficulties the source is modeled as a linear combination of indicator functions of measurable domains leading to a nonlinear operator equation. The solution process is stabilized by a Tikhonov like functional which penalizes the perimeter of the domains. For the resulting minimization problem existence of a minimizer, stability, and regularization property are shown. Moreover, an approximate variational principle is developed based on the calculated domain derivatives which states that there exist smooth almost stationary points of the Tikhonov like functional near to any of its minimizers. This is a crucial property from a numerical point of view as it allows to approximate the searched-for domain by smooth domains. Based on the theoretical findings numerical schemes are proposed and tested for star-shaped sources in 2D: computational experiments illustrate performance and limitations of the considered approach.
Keywords: Bioluminescence tomography, shape optimization., domain derivative, inverse source problem, Tikhonov like regularization.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 65J15, 65J2.
Citation: Tim Kreutzmann, Andreas Rieder. Geometric reconstruction in bioluminescence tomography. Inverse Problems and Imaging, 2014, 8 (1) : 173-197. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2014.8.173
References:
[1]

K. Atkinson and W. Han, Theoretical Numerical Analysis, 3rd edition, Texts in Applied Mathematics, 39, Springer, Dordrecht, 2009. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-0458-4.

[2]

H. Attouch, G. Buttazzo and G.Michaille, Variational Analysis in Sobolev and BV Space, MPS-SIAM Series on Optimization, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, 2006.

[3]

G. Bal, Inverse transport theory and applications, Inverse Problems, 25 (2009), 053001, 48 pp. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/25/5/053001.

[4]

M. Berger and B. Gostiaux, Differential Geometry: Manifolds, Curves and Surfaces, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 115, Springer, New York, 1988.

[5]

M. Burger and S. J. Osher, A survey on level set methods for inverse problems and optimal design, European J. Appl. Math., 16 (2005), 263-301. doi: 10.1017/S0956792505006182.

[6]

F. Caubet, M. Dambrine, D. Kateb and C. Z. Timimoun, A Kohn-Vogelius formulation to detect an obstacle immersed in a fluid, Inverse Probl. Imaging, 7 (2013), 123-157. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2013.7.123.

[7]

W. Cong, G. Wang, D. Kumar, Y. Liu, M. Jiang, L. Wang, E. Hoffman, G. McLennan, P. McCray, J. Zabner and A. Cong, Practical reconstruction method for bioluminescence tomography, Opt. Express, 13 (2005), 6756-6771. doi: 10.1364/OPEX.13.006756.

[8]

C. H. Contag and B. D. Ross, It's not just about anatomy: In vivo bioluminescence imaging as an eyepiece into biology, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 16 (2002), 378-387. doi: 10.1002/jmri.10178.

[9]

A. De Cezaro and A. Leitão, Level-set approaches of $L_2$-type for recovering shape and contrast in ill-posed problems, Inverse Probl. Sci. Eng., 20 (2012), 571-587. doi: 10.1080/17415977.2011.639452.

[10]

M. C. Delfour and J.-P. Zolésio, Shapes and Geometries: Analysis, Differential Calculus, and Optimization, Advances in Design and Control, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, 2001. doi: 10.1137/1.9780898719826.

[11]

I. Ekeland, On the variational principle, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 47 (1974), 324-353. doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(74)90025-0.

[12]

______, Nonconvex minization problems, Bull. Am. Math. Soc., New Ser., 1 (1979), 443-474. doi: 10.1090/S0273-0979-1979-14595-6.

[13]

W. Freeden, T. Gervens and M. Schreiner, Constructive Approximation on the Sphere, Numerical Mathematics and Scientific Computation, Oxford University Press, New York, 1998.

[14]

E. Giusti, Minimal Surfaces and Functions of Bounded Variation, Monographs in Mathematics, 80, Birkhäuser, Boston, 1984.

[15]

W. Han, W. Cong and G. Wang, Mathematical theory and numerical analysis of bioluminescence tomography, Inverse Problems, 22 (2006), 1659-1675. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/22/5/008.

[16]

M. Hanke-Bourgeois, Grundlagen der Numerischen Mathematik und des Wissenschaftlichen Rechnens, 3rd edition, Vieweg + Teubner, Wiesbaden, 2009. doi: 10.1007/978-3-8348-9309-3.

[17]

H. Harbrecht and J. Tausch, An efficient numerical method for a shape-identification problem arising from the heat equation, Inverse Problems, 27 (2011), 065013, 18 pp. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/27/6/065013.

[18]

F. Hettlich, The Domain Derivative in Inverse Obstacle Problems, Habilitation thesis, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Erlangen, 1999.

[19]

M. Hinze, R. Pinnau, M. Ulbrich and S. Ulbrich, Optimization with PDE Constraints, Mathematical Modelling: Theory and Applications, 23, Springer, 2009. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8839-1_3.

[20]

C. T. Kelley, Iterative Methods for Optimization, Frontiers in Applied Mathematics, 18, SIAM, Philadelphia, 1999. doi: 10.1137/1.9781611970920.

[21]

J. Nocedal and S. J. Wright, Numerical Optimization, 2nd edition, Springer Series in Operation Research and Financial Engineering, Springer, New York, 2006.

[22]

R. Ramlau and W. Ring, A Mumford-Shah level-set approach for the inversion and segmentation of X-ray tomography data, J. Comput. Phys., 221 (2007), 539-557. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2006.06.041.

[23]

_______, Regularization of ill-posed Mumford-Shah models with perimeter penalization, Inverse Problems, 26 (2010), 115001, 25 pp. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/26/11/115001.

[24]

J. Simon, Differentiation with respect to the domain in boundary value problems, Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim., 2 (1980), 649-687. doi: 10.1080/01630563.1980.10120631.

[25]

G. Wang, Y. Li and M. Jiang, Uniqueness theorems in bioluminescence tomography, Medical Physics 31 (2004), 2289-2299. doi: 10.1118/1.1766420.

[26]

R. Weissleder and V. Ntziachristos, Shedding light onto live molecular targets, Nat. Med., 9 (2003), 123-128. doi: 10.1038/nm0103-123.

[27]

H. Weyl, On the volume of tubes, Amer. J. Math., 61 (1939), 461-472. doi: 10.2307/2371513.

show all references

References:
[1]

K. Atkinson and W. Han, Theoretical Numerical Analysis, 3rd edition, Texts in Applied Mathematics, 39, Springer, Dordrecht, 2009. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-0458-4.

[2]

H. Attouch, G. Buttazzo and G.Michaille, Variational Analysis in Sobolev and BV Space, MPS-SIAM Series on Optimization, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, 2006.

[3]

G. Bal, Inverse transport theory and applications, Inverse Problems, 25 (2009), 053001, 48 pp. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/25/5/053001.

[4]

M. Berger and B. Gostiaux, Differential Geometry: Manifolds, Curves and Surfaces, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 115, Springer, New York, 1988.

[5]

M. Burger and S. J. Osher, A survey on level set methods for inverse problems and optimal design, European J. Appl. Math., 16 (2005), 263-301. doi: 10.1017/S0956792505006182.

[6]

F. Caubet, M. Dambrine, D. Kateb and C. Z. Timimoun, A Kohn-Vogelius formulation to detect an obstacle immersed in a fluid, Inverse Probl. Imaging, 7 (2013), 123-157. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2013.7.123.

[7]

W. Cong, G. Wang, D. Kumar, Y. Liu, M. Jiang, L. Wang, E. Hoffman, G. McLennan, P. McCray, J. Zabner and A. Cong, Practical reconstruction method for bioluminescence tomography, Opt. Express, 13 (2005), 6756-6771. doi: 10.1364/OPEX.13.006756.

[8]

C. H. Contag and B. D. Ross, It's not just about anatomy: In vivo bioluminescence imaging as an eyepiece into biology, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 16 (2002), 378-387. doi: 10.1002/jmri.10178.

[9]

A. De Cezaro and A. Leitão, Level-set approaches of $L_2$-type for recovering shape and contrast in ill-posed problems, Inverse Probl. Sci. Eng., 20 (2012), 571-587. doi: 10.1080/17415977.2011.639452.

[10]

M. C. Delfour and J.-P. Zolésio, Shapes and Geometries: Analysis, Differential Calculus, and Optimization, Advances in Design and Control, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, 2001. doi: 10.1137/1.9780898719826.

[11]

I. Ekeland, On the variational principle, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 47 (1974), 324-353. doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(74)90025-0.

[12]

______, Nonconvex minization problems, Bull. Am. Math. Soc., New Ser., 1 (1979), 443-474. doi: 10.1090/S0273-0979-1979-14595-6.

[13]

W. Freeden, T. Gervens and M. Schreiner, Constructive Approximation on the Sphere, Numerical Mathematics and Scientific Computation, Oxford University Press, New York, 1998.

[14]

E. Giusti, Minimal Surfaces and Functions of Bounded Variation, Monographs in Mathematics, 80, Birkhäuser, Boston, 1984.

[15]

W. Han, W. Cong and G. Wang, Mathematical theory and numerical analysis of bioluminescence tomography, Inverse Problems, 22 (2006), 1659-1675. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/22/5/008.

[16]

M. Hanke-Bourgeois, Grundlagen der Numerischen Mathematik und des Wissenschaftlichen Rechnens, 3rd edition, Vieweg + Teubner, Wiesbaden, 2009. doi: 10.1007/978-3-8348-9309-3.

[17]

H. Harbrecht and J. Tausch, An efficient numerical method for a shape-identification problem arising from the heat equation, Inverse Problems, 27 (2011), 065013, 18 pp. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/27/6/065013.

[18]

F. Hettlich, The Domain Derivative in Inverse Obstacle Problems, Habilitation thesis, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Erlangen, 1999.

[19]

M. Hinze, R. Pinnau, M. Ulbrich and S. Ulbrich, Optimization with PDE Constraints, Mathematical Modelling: Theory and Applications, 23, Springer, 2009. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8839-1_3.

[20]

C. T. Kelley, Iterative Methods for Optimization, Frontiers in Applied Mathematics, 18, SIAM, Philadelphia, 1999. doi: 10.1137/1.9781611970920.

[21]

J. Nocedal and S. J. Wright, Numerical Optimization, 2nd edition, Springer Series in Operation Research and Financial Engineering, Springer, New York, 2006.

[22]

R. Ramlau and W. Ring, A Mumford-Shah level-set approach for the inversion and segmentation of X-ray tomography data, J. Comput. Phys., 221 (2007), 539-557. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2006.06.041.

[23]

_______, Regularization of ill-posed Mumford-Shah models with perimeter penalization, Inverse Problems, 26 (2010), 115001, 25 pp. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/26/11/115001.

[24]

J. Simon, Differentiation with respect to the domain in boundary value problems, Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim., 2 (1980), 649-687. doi: 10.1080/01630563.1980.10120631.

[25]

G. Wang, Y. Li and M. Jiang, Uniqueness theorems in bioluminescence tomography, Medical Physics 31 (2004), 2289-2299. doi: 10.1118/1.1766420.

[26]

R. Weissleder and V. Ntziachristos, Shedding light onto live molecular targets, Nat. Med., 9 (2003), 123-128. doi: 10.1038/nm0103-123.

[27]

H. Weyl, On the volume of tubes, Amer. J. Math., 61 (1939), 461-472. doi: 10.2307/2371513.

[1]

Lekbir Afraites, Chorouk Masnaoui, Mourad Nachaoui. Shape optimization method for an inverse geometric source problem and stability at critical shape. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2022, 15 (1) : 1-21. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2021006
[2]

Barbara Kaltenbacher, Gunther Peichl. The shape derivative for an optimization problem in lithotripsy. Evolution Equations and Control Theory, 2016, 5 (3) : 399-430. doi: 10.3934/eect.2016011
[3]

Barbara Brandolini, Carlo Nitsch, Cristina Trombetti. Shape optimization for Monge-Ampère equations via domain derivative. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2011, 4 (4) : 825-831. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2011.4.825
[4]

Abhishake Rastogi. Tikhonov regularization with oversmoothing penalty for nonlinear statistical inverse problems. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (8) : 4111-4126. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020183
[5]

Vinicius Albani, Adriano De Cezaro. A connection between uniqueness of minimizers in Tikhonov-type regularization and Morozov-like discrepancy principles. Inverse Problems and Imaging, 2019, 13 (1) : 211-229. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2019012
[6]

Frank Hettlich. The domain derivative for semilinear elliptic inverse obstacle problems. Inverse Problems and Imaging, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2021071
[7]

Armin Lechleiter, Marcel Rennoch. Non-linear Tikhonov regularization in Banach spaces for inverse scattering from anisotropic penetrable media. Inverse Problems and Imaging, 2017, 11 (1) : 151-176. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2017008
[8]

Thorsten Hohage, Mihaela Pricop. Nonlinear Tikhonov regularization in Hilbert scales for inverse boundary value problems with random noise. Inverse Problems and Imaging, 2008, 2 (2) : 271-290. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2008.2.271
[9]

Luca Rondi. On the regularization of the inverse conductivity problem with discontinuous conductivities. Inverse Problems and Imaging, 2008, 2 (3) : 397-409. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2008.2.397
[10]

Plamen Stefanov, Gunther Uhlmann. Instability of the linearized problem in multiwave tomography of recovery both the source and the speed. Inverse Problems and Imaging, 2013, 7 (4) : 1367-1377. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2013.7.1367
[11]

Xiaoli Feng, Meixia Zhao, Peijun Li, Xu Wang. An inverse source problem for the stochastic wave equation. Inverse Problems and Imaging, 2022, 16 (2) : 397-415. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2021055
[12]

Shui-Nee Chow, Ke Yin, Hao-Min Zhou, Ali Behrooz. Solving inverse source problems by the Orthogonal Solution and Kernel Correction Algorithm (OSKCA) with applications in fluorescence tomography. Inverse Problems and Imaging, 2014, 8 (1) : 79-102. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2014.8.79
[13]

Stefan Kindermann, Andreas Neubauer. On the convergence of the quasioptimality criterion for (iterated) Tikhonov regularization. Inverse Problems and Imaging, 2008, 2 (2) : 291-299. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2008.2.291
[14]

Andreas Neubauer. On Tikhonov-type regularization with approximated penalty terms. Inverse Problems and Imaging, 2021, 15 (5) : 1035-1050. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2021027
[15]

Jaroslav Haslinger, Raino A. E. Mäkinen, Jan Stebel. Shape optimization for Stokes problem with threshold slip boundary conditions. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2017, 10 (6) : 1281-1301. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2017069
[16]

Alberto Bressan, Sondre Tesdal Galtung. A 2-dimensional shape optimization problem for tree branches. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2021, 16 (1) : 1-29. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2020031
[17]

John Sebastian Simon, Hirofumi Notsu. A shape optimization problem constrained with the Stokes equations to address maximization of vortices. Evolution Equations and Control Theory, 2022  doi: 10.3934/eect.2022003
[18]

Biao Qu, Naihua Xiu. A relaxed extragradient-like method for a class of constrained optimization problem. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2007, 3 (4) : 645-654. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2007.3.645
[19]

Ke Zhang, Maokun Li, Fan Yang, Shenheng Xu, Aria Abubakar. Electrical impedance tomography with multiplicative regularization. Inverse Problems and Imaging, 2019, 13 (6) : 1139-1159. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2019051
[20]

Peijun Li, Ganghua Yuan. Increasing stability for the inverse source scattering problem with multi-frequencies. Inverse Problems and Imaging, 2017, 11 (4) : 745-759. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2017035

2020 Impact Factor: 1.639

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (59)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (1)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2022 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences | Privacy Policy