An adaptive finite element method in $L^2$-TV-based image denoising

Michael Hintermüller; Monserrat Rincon-Camacho

doi:10.3934/ipi.2014.8.685

Previous Article
Stability of the determination of a coefficient for wave equations in an infinite waveguide
IPI Home
This Issue
Next Article
Resolution enhancement from scattering in passive sensor imaging with cross correlations

August 2014, 8(3): 685-711. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2014.8.685

An adaptive finite element method in $L^2$-TV-based image denoising

Michael Hintermüller ^1, and Monserrat Rincon-Camacho ^2,

1.	Department of Mathematics, Humboldt-University of Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany
2.	START-Project "Interfaces and Free Boundaries" and SFB "Mathematical Optimization and Applications in Biomedical Science", Institute of Mathematics and Scientific Computing, University of Graz, Heinrichstrasse 36, A-8010 Graz, Austria

Received October 2012 Revised June 2013 Published August 2014

Abstract
Related Papers

The first order optimality system of a total variation regularization based variational model with $L^2$-data-fitting in image denoising ($L^2$-TV problem) can be expressed as an elliptic variational inequality of the second kind. For a finite element discretization of the variational inequality problem, an a posteriori error residual based error estimator is derived and its reliability and (partial) efficiency are established. The results are applied to solve the $L^2$-TV problem by means of the adaptive finite element method. The adaptive mesh refinement relies on the newly derived a posteriori error estimator and on an additional heuristic providing a local variance estimator to cope with noisy data. The numerical solution of the discrete problem on each level of refinement is obtained by a superlinearly convergent algorithm based on Fenchel-duality and inexact semismooth Newton techniques and which is stable with respect to noise in the data. Numerical results justifying the advantage of adaptive finite elements solutions are presented.

Keywords: A posteriori error estimation, primal-dual method, adaptive finite elements, semismooth Newton method., elliptic variational inequality of the second kind, total variation.

Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 58F15, 58F17; Secondary: 53C3.

Citation: Michael Hintermüller, Monserrat Rincon-Camacho. An adaptive finite element method in $L^2$-TV-based image denoising. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2014, 8 (3) : 685-711. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2014.8.685

References:

[1]	R. Acar and C. R. Vogel, Analysis of bounded variation penalty methods for ill-posed problems, Inverse Prolems, 10 (1994), 1217-1229. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/10/6/003. Google Scholar
[2]	R. A. Adams and J. J. Fournier, Sobolev Spaces, volume 140. Academic Press, 2nd edition, 2003. Google Scholar
[3]	M. Ainsworth and J. T. Oden, A Posteriori Error Estimation in Finite Element Analysis, Wiley, New York, 2000. doi: 10.1002/9781118032824. Google Scholar
[4]	J. Alberty, C. Carstensen and S. Funken, Remarks around 50 lines of matlab: Short finite element implementation, Numerical Algorithms, 20 (1999), 117-137. doi: 10.1023/A:1019155918070. Google Scholar
[5]	A. Almansa, C. Ballester, V. Caselles and G. Haro, A TV based restoration model with local constraints, Journal Scientific Computing, 34 (2008), 209-236. doi: 10.1007/s10915-007-9160-x. Google Scholar
[6]	W. Bangerth and A. Joshi, Adaptive finite element methods for the solution of inverse problems in optical tomography, Inverse Problems, 24 (2008), 034011, 22 pp. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/24/3/034011. Google Scholar
[7]	W. Bangerth and R. Rannacher, Adaptive Finite Element Methods for Differential Equations, Birkhäuser, 2003. doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-7605-6. Google Scholar
[8]	E. Bänsch and K. Mikula, A coarsening finite element strategy in images selective smoothing, Computing and Visualization in Science, 1 (1997), 53-61. Google Scholar
[9]	C. Bazan and P. Blomgren, Adaptive finite element method for image processing, In Proceedings of the COMSOL Multiphysics Conference 2005 Boston, 2005. Google Scholar
[10]	E. C. Bingham, Fluidity and Plasticty, International chemical series. McGraw-Hill Book Company, inc., 1922. Google Scholar
[11]	V. Bostan, W. Han and B. D. Reddy, A posteriori error estimation and adaptive solution of elliptic variational inequalities of the second kind, Applied Numerical Mathematics, 52 (2005), 13-38. doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2004.06.012. Google Scholar
[12]	D. Braess and R. Verfürth, A posteriori error estimators for the Raviart-Thomas element, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 33 (1996), 2431-2444. doi: 10.1137/S0036142994264079. Google Scholar
[13]	F. Brezzi and M. Fortin, Mixed and Hybrid Finite Element Methods, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-3172-1. Google Scholar
[14]	A. Chambolle, An algorithm for total variation minimization and application, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 20 (2004), 89-97. doi: 10.1023/B:JMIV.0000011321.19549.88. Google Scholar
[15]	A. Chambolle and P-L. Lions., Image recovery via total variation minimization and related problems, Numerische Mathematik, 76 (1997), 167-188. doi: 10.1007/s002110050258. Google Scholar
[16]	Q. Chang and I-L. Chern, Acceleration methods for total variation-based image denoising, SIAM J. Applied Mathematics, 25 (2003), 982-994. doi: 10.1137/S106482750241534X. Google Scholar
[17]	P. G. Ciarlet, The Finite Element Method for Elliptic Problems, North Holland, 1978. Google Scholar
[18]	P. Clément, Approximation by finite element functions using local regularization, RAIRO Analyse Numérique, 9 (1975), 77-84. Google Scholar
[19]	E. J. Dean, R. Glowinski and G. Guidoboni, On the numerical simulation of Bingham visco-plastic flow: Old and new results, Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 142 (2007), 36-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2006.09.002. Google Scholar
[20]	D. C. Dobson and C. R. Vogel, Convergence of an iterative method for total variation denoising, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 34 (1997), 1779-1791. doi: 10.1137/S003614299528701X. Google Scholar
[21]	Y. Dong, M. Hintermüller and M. M. Rincon-Camacho, Automated regularization parameter selection in multi-scale total variation models for image restoration, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 40 (2011), 82-104. doi: 10.1007/s10851-010-0248-9. Google Scholar
[22]	G. Duvaut and J. L. Lions, Inequalities in Mechanics and Physics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1976. Google Scholar
[23]	I. Ekeland and R. Témam, Convex Analysis and Variational Problems, Classics Appl. Math. 28, SIAM, 1999. doi: 10.1137/1.9781611971088. Google Scholar
[24]	X. Feng and A. Prohl, Analysis of total variation flow and its finite element approximations, ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 37 (2003), 533-556. doi: 10.1051/m2an:2003041. Google Scholar
[25]	K. Frick and P. Marnitz, Statistical multiresolution dantzig estimation in imaging: Fundamental concepts and algorithmic framework, Electronic Journal of Statistics, 6 (2012), 231-268. doi: 10.1214/12-EJS671. Google Scholar
[26]	K. Frick, P. Marnitz and A. Munk, Statistical multiresolution estimation for variational imaging: with an application in Poisson-biophotonics, J. Math. Imaging Vision, 46 (2013), 370-387. doi: 10.1007/s10851-012-0368-5. Google Scholar
[27]	M. Fried, Multichannel image segmentation using adaptive finite elements, Computing and Visualization in Science, 12 (2009), 125-135. doi: 10.1007/s00791-007-0082-9. Google Scholar
[28]	I. A. Frigaard and O. Scherzer, Uniaxial exchange flows of two Bingham fluids in a cylindrical duct, IMA journal of applied mathematics, 61 (1998), 237-266. doi: 10.1093/imamat/61.3.237. Google Scholar
[29]	I. A. Frigaard and O. Scherzer, The effects of yield stress variation on uniaxial exchange flows of two Bingham fluids in a pipe, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 60 (2000), 1950-1976. doi: 10.1137/S0036139998335165. Google Scholar
[30]	E. Giusti, Minimal Surfaces and Functions of Bounded Variation, Birkhäuser, 1984. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-9486-0. Google Scholar
[31]	R. Glowinski, J. L. Lions and R. Trémolières, Analyse Numérique des Inéquations Variationelles, Dunod, Paris, France, 1976. Google Scholar
[32]	E. J. Gumbel, Les valeurs extrêmes des distributions statistiques, Annales de l'institut Henri Poincaré, 5 (1935), 115-158. Google Scholar
[33]	M. Guven et al, Effect of discretization error analysis and adaptive mesh generation in diffuse optical absorption imaging: I, Inverse Problems, 23 (2007), 1115-1133. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/23/3/017. Google Scholar
[34]	M. Guven et al, Discretization error analysis and adaptive meshing algorithms for fluorescence diffuse optical tomography: Part I, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., 29 (2010), 217-229. Google Scholar
[35]	E. Haber, S. Heldmann and U. Ascher, Adaptive finite volume method for distributed non-smooth parameter identification, Inverse Problems, 23 (2007), 1659-1676. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/23/4/017. Google Scholar
[36]	E. Haber, S. Heldmann and J. Modersitzki, An octree method for parametric image registration, SIAM J. on Scientific Computing, 29 (2007), 2008-2023. doi: 10.1137/060662605. Google Scholar
[37]	E. Haber, S. Heldmann and J. Modersitzki, Adaptive mesh refinement for non parametric image registration, SIAM J. on Scientific Computing, 30 (2008), 3012-3027. doi: 10.1137/070687724. Google Scholar
[38]	E. Hashrova, Z. Kabluchko and A. Wübker, Extremes of independent chi-square random vectors, Extremes, 15 (2012), 35-42. doi: 10.1007/s10687-010-0125-3. Google Scholar
[39]	M. Hintermüller, R. H. W. Hoppe, Y. Iliash and M. Kieweg, An a posteriori error analysis of adaptive finite element methods for distributed elliptic control problems with control constraints, ESAIM: COCV, 14 (2008), 540-560. doi: 10.1051/cocv:2007057. Google Scholar
[40]	M. Hintermüller, K. Ito and K. Kunisch, The primal-dual active set strategy as a semismooth newton method, SIAM Journal on Optimization, 13 (2002), 865-888. doi: 10.1137/S1052623401383558. Google Scholar
[41]	M. Hintermüller and K. Kunisch, Total bounded variation regularization as bilaterally constrained optimization problem, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 64 (2004), 1311-1333. doi: 10.1137/S0036139903422784. Google Scholar
[42]	M. Hintermüller and G. Stadler, An infeasible primal-dual algorithm for total bounded variation-based inf-convolution-type image restoration, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 28 (2006), 1-23. doi: 10.1137/040613263. Google Scholar
[43]	T. Hotz, P. Marnitz, R. Stichtenoth, L. Davies, Z. Kabluchko and A. Munk, Locally adaptive image denoising by a statistical multiresolution criterion, Comput. Stat. Data Anal., 56 (2012), 543-558. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2011.08.018. Google Scholar
[44]	S. Osher, M. Burger, D. Goldfarb, J. Xu and W. Yin, An iterative regularization method for total variation-based image restoration, SIAM Multiscale Model. and Simu., 4 (2005), 460-489. doi: 10.1137/040605412. Google Scholar
[45]	T. Preusser and M. Rumpf, An adaptive finite element method for large scale image processing,, In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Scale-Space Theories in Computer Vision, (): 223. Google Scholar
[46]	N. Roquet and P. Saramito, An adaptive finite element method for bingham fluid flows around a cylinder, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 192 (2003), 3317-3341. doi: 10.1016/S0045-7825(03)00262-7. Google Scholar
[47]	L. I. Rudin, S. Osher and E. Fatemi, Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms, Physica D, 60 (1992), 259-268. doi: 10.1016/0167-2789(92)90242-F. Google Scholar
[48]	L. Rudin, MTV-multiscale Total Variation Principle for a Pde-based Solution to Nonsmooth Ill-posed Problem, Technical report, Cognitech, Inc. Talk presented at the Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Computer Vision, University of Minnesota, 1995. Google Scholar
[49]	D. Strong and T. Chan, Spatially and Scale Adaptive Total Variation Based Regularization and Anisotropic Diffusion in Image Processing, Technical report, UCLA, 1996. Google Scholar
[50]	D. Strong and T. Chan, Edge-preserving and scale-dependent properties of total variation regularization, Inverse Problems, 19 (2003), S165-S187. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/19/6/059. Google Scholar
[51]	R. Temam, Navier-Stokes Equations, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977. Google Scholar
[52]	R. Verfürth, A Review of A Posteriori Error Estimation and Adaptive Mesh Refinement Techniques, Wiley Teubner, 1996. Google Scholar
[53]	C. R. Vogel, Computational Methods for Inverse Problems, volume 23 of Frontiers Appl. Math. SIAM-Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2002. doi: 10.1137/1.9780898717570. Google Scholar
[54]	G. Winkler, Image Analysis, Random Fields And Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods: A Mathematical Introduction, Applications of mathematics. Springer, 2003. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-55760-6. Google Scholar

show all references

References:

[1]	R. Acar and C. R. Vogel, Analysis of bounded variation penalty methods for ill-posed problems, Inverse Prolems, 10 (1994), 1217-1229. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/10/6/003. Google Scholar
[2]	R. A. Adams and J. J. Fournier, Sobolev Spaces, volume 140. Academic Press, 2nd edition, 2003. Google Scholar
[3]	M. Ainsworth and J. T. Oden, A Posteriori Error Estimation in Finite Element Analysis, Wiley, New York, 2000. doi: 10.1002/9781118032824. Google Scholar
[4]	J. Alberty, C. Carstensen and S. Funken, Remarks around 50 lines of matlab: Short finite element implementation, Numerical Algorithms, 20 (1999), 117-137. doi: 10.1023/A:1019155918070. Google Scholar
[5]	A. Almansa, C. Ballester, V. Caselles and G. Haro, A TV based restoration model with local constraints, Journal Scientific Computing, 34 (2008), 209-236. doi: 10.1007/s10915-007-9160-x. Google Scholar
[6]	W. Bangerth and A. Joshi, Adaptive finite element methods for the solution of inverse problems in optical tomography, Inverse Problems, 24 (2008), 034011, 22 pp. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/24/3/034011. Google Scholar
[7]	W. Bangerth and R. Rannacher, Adaptive Finite Element Methods for Differential Equations, Birkhäuser, 2003. doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-7605-6. Google Scholar
[8]	E. Bänsch and K. Mikula, A coarsening finite element strategy in images selective smoothing, Computing and Visualization in Science, 1 (1997), 53-61. Google Scholar
[9]	C. Bazan and P. Blomgren, Adaptive finite element method for image processing, In Proceedings of the COMSOL Multiphysics Conference 2005 Boston, 2005. Google Scholar
[10]	E. C. Bingham, Fluidity and Plasticty, International chemical series. McGraw-Hill Book Company, inc., 1922. Google Scholar
[11]	V. Bostan, W. Han and B. D. Reddy, A posteriori error estimation and adaptive solution of elliptic variational inequalities of the second kind, Applied Numerical Mathematics, 52 (2005), 13-38. doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2004.06.012. Google Scholar
[12]	D. Braess and R. Verfürth, A posteriori error estimators for the Raviart-Thomas element, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 33 (1996), 2431-2444. doi: 10.1137/S0036142994264079. Google Scholar
[13]	F. Brezzi and M. Fortin, Mixed and Hybrid Finite Element Methods, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-3172-1. Google Scholar
[14]	A. Chambolle, An algorithm for total variation minimization and application, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 20 (2004), 89-97. doi: 10.1023/B:JMIV.0000011321.19549.88. Google Scholar
[15]	A. Chambolle and P-L. Lions., Image recovery via total variation minimization and related problems, Numerische Mathematik, 76 (1997), 167-188. doi: 10.1007/s002110050258. Google Scholar
[16]	Q. Chang and I-L. Chern, Acceleration methods for total variation-based image denoising, SIAM J. Applied Mathematics, 25 (2003), 982-994. doi: 10.1137/S106482750241534X. Google Scholar
[17]	P. G. Ciarlet, The Finite Element Method for Elliptic Problems, North Holland, 1978. Google Scholar
[18]	P. Clément, Approximation by finite element functions using local regularization, RAIRO Analyse Numérique, 9 (1975), 77-84. Google Scholar
[19]	E. J. Dean, R. Glowinski and G. Guidoboni, On the numerical simulation of Bingham visco-plastic flow: Old and new results, Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 142 (2007), 36-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2006.09.002. Google Scholar
[20]	D. C. Dobson and C. R. Vogel, Convergence of an iterative method for total variation denoising, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 34 (1997), 1779-1791. doi: 10.1137/S003614299528701X. Google Scholar
[21]	Y. Dong, M. Hintermüller and M. M. Rincon-Camacho, Automated regularization parameter selection in multi-scale total variation models for image restoration, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 40 (2011), 82-104. doi: 10.1007/s10851-010-0248-9. Google Scholar
[22]	G. Duvaut and J. L. Lions, Inequalities in Mechanics and Physics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1976. Google Scholar
[23]	I. Ekeland and R. Témam, Convex Analysis and Variational Problems, Classics Appl. Math. 28, SIAM, 1999. doi: 10.1137/1.9781611971088. Google Scholar
[24]	X. Feng and A. Prohl, Analysis of total variation flow and its finite element approximations, ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 37 (2003), 533-556. doi: 10.1051/m2an:2003041. Google Scholar
[25]	K. Frick and P. Marnitz, Statistical multiresolution dantzig estimation in imaging: Fundamental concepts and algorithmic framework, Electronic Journal of Statistics, 6 (2012), 231-268. doi: 10.1214/12-EJS671. Google Scholar
[26]	K. Frick, P. Marnitz and A. Munk, Statistical multiresolution estimation for variational imaging: with an application in Poisson-biophotonics, J. Math. Imaging Vision, 46 (2013), 370-387. doi: 10.1007/s10851-012-0368-5. Google Scholar
[27]	M. Fried, Multichannel image segmentation using adaptive finite elements, Computing and Visualization in Science, 12 (2009), 125-135. doi: 10.1007/s00791-007-0082-9. Google Scholar
[28]	I. A. Frigaard and O. Scherzer, Uniaxial exchange flows of two Bingham fluids in a cylindrical duct, IMA journal of applied mathematics, 61 (1998), 237-266. doi: 10.1093/imamat/61.3.237. Google Scholar
[29]	I. A. Frigaard and O. Scherzer, The effects of yield stress variation on uniaxial exchange flows of two Bingham fluids in a pipe, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 60 (2000), 1950-1976. doi: 10.1137/S0036139998335165. Google Scholar
[30]	E. Giusti, Minimal Surfaces and Functions of Bounded Variation, Birkhäuser, 1984. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-9486-0. Google Scholar
[31]	R. Glowinski, J. L. Lions and R. Trémolières, Analyse Numérique des Inéquations Variationelles, Dunod, Paris, France, 1976. Google Scholar
[32]	E. J. Gumbel, Les valeurs extrêmes des distributions statistiques, Annales de l'institut Henri Poincaré, 5 (1935), 115-158. Google Scholar
[33]	M. Guven et al, Effect of discretization error analysis and adaptive mesh generation in diffuse optical absorption imaging: I, Inverse Problems, 23 (2007), 1115-1133. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/23/3/017. Google Scholar
[34]	M. Guven et al, Discretization error analysis and adaptive meshing algorithms for fluorescence diffuse optical tomography: Part I, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., 29 (2010), 217-229. Google Scholar
[35]	E. Haber, S. Heldmann and U. Ascher, Adaptive finite volume method for distributed non-smooth parameter identification, Inverse Problems, 23 (2007), 1659-1676. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/23/4/017. Google Scholar
[36]	E. Haber, S. Heldmann and J. Modersitzki, An octree method for parametric image registration, SIAM J. on Scientific Computing, 29 (2007), 2008-2023. doi: 10.1137/060662605. Google Scholar
[37]	E. Haber, S. Heldmann and J. Modersitzki, Adaptive mesh refinement for non parametric image registration, SIAM J. on Scientific Computing, 30 (2008), 3012-3027. doi: 10.1137/070687724. Google Scholar
[38]	E. Hashrova, Z. Kabluchko and A. Wübker, Extremes of independent chi-square random vectors, Extremes, 15 (2012), 35-42. doi: 10.1007/s10687-010-0125-3. Google Scholar
[39]	M. Hintermüller, R. H. W. Hoppe, Y. Iliash and M. Kieweg, An a posteriori error analysis of adaptive finite element methods for distributed elliptic control problems with control constraints, ESAIM: COCV, 14 (2008), 540-560. doi: 10.1051/cocv:2007057. Google Scholar
[40]	M. Hintermüller, K. Ito and K. Kunisch, The primal-dual active set strategy as a semismooth newton method, SIAM Journal on Optimization, 13 (2002), 865-888. doi: 10.1137/S1052623401383558. Google Scholar
[41]	M. Hintermüller and K. Kunisch, Total bounded variation regularization as bilaterally constrained optimization problem, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 64 (2004), 1311-1333. doi: 10.1137/S0036139903422784. Google Scholar
[42]	M. Hintermüller and G. Stadler, An infeasible primal-dual algorithm for total bounded variation-based inf-convolution-type image restoration, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 28 (2006), 1-23. doi: 10.1137/040613263. Google Scholar
[43]	T. Hotz, P. Marnitz, R. Stichtenoth, L. Davies, Z. Kabluchko and A. Munk, Locally adaptive image denoising by a statistical multiresolution criterion, Comput. Stat. Data Anal., 56 (2012), 543-558. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2011.08.018. Google Scholar
[44]	S. Osher, M. Burger, D. Goldfarb, J. Xu and W. Yin, An iterative regularization method for total variation-based image restoration, SIAM Multiscale Model. and Simu., 4 (2005), 460-489. doi: 10.1137/040605412. Google Scholar
[45]	T. Preusser and M. Rumpf, An adaptive finite element method for large scale image processing,, In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Scale-Space Theories in Computer Vision, (): 223. Google Scholar
[46]	N. Roquet and P. Saramito, An adaptive finite element method for bingham fluid flows around a cylinder, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 192 (2003), 3317-3341. doi: 10.1016/S0045-7825(03)00262-7. Google Scholar
[47]	L. I. Rudin, S. Osher and E. Fatemi, Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms, Physica D, 60 (1992), 259-268. doi: 10.1016/0167-2789(92)90242-F. Google Scholar
[48]	L. Rudin, MTV-multiscale Total Variation Principle for a Pde-based Solution to Nonsmooth Ill-posed Problem, Technical report, Cognitech, Inc. Talk presented at the Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Computer Vision, University of Minnesota, 1995. Google Scholar
[49]	D. Strong and T. Chan, Spatially and Scale Adaptive Total Variation Based Regularization and Anisotropic Diffusion in Image Processing, Technical report, UCLA, 1996. Google Scholar
[50]	D. Strong and T. Chan, Edge-preserving and scale-dependent properties of total variation regularization, Inverse Problems, 19 (2003), S165-S187. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/19/6/059. Google Scholar
[51]	R. Temam, Navier-Stokes Equations, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977. Google Scholar
[52]	R. Verfürth, A Review of A Posteriori Error Estimation and Adaptive Mesh Refinement Techniques, Wiley Teubner, 1996. Google Scholar
[53]	C. R. Vogel, Computational Methods for Inverse Problems, volume 23 of Frontiers Appl. Math. SIAM-Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2002. doi: 10.1137/1.9780898717570. Google Scholar
[54]	G. Winkler, Image Analysis, Random Fields And Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods: A Mathematical Introduction, Applications of mathematics. Springer, 2003. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-55760-6. Google Scholar

[1]	Shuang Chen, Li-Ping Pang, Dan Li. An inexact semismooth Newton method for variational inequality with symmetric cone constraints. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2015, 11 (3) : 733-746. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2015.11.733
[2]	Xiaojing Ye, Haomin Zhou. Fast total variation wavelet inpainting via approximated primal-dual hybrid gradient algorithm. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2013, 7 (3) : 1031-1050. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2013.7.1031
[3]	Hatim Tayeq, Amal Bergam, Anouar El Harrak, Kenza Khomsi. Self-adaptive algorithm based on a posteriori analysis of the error applied to air quality forecasting using the finite volume method. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020 doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020400
[4]	Ke Chen, Yiqiu Dong, Michael Hintermüller. A nonlinear multigrid solver with line Gauss-Seidel-semismooth-Newton smoother for the Fenchel pre-dual in total variation based image restoration. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2011, 5 (2) : 323-339. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2011.5.323
[5]	Johnathan M. Bardsley. An efficient computational method for total variation-penalized Poisson likelihood estimation. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2008, 2 (2) : 167-185. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2008.2.167
[6]	Yu-Hong Dai, Xin-Wei Liu, Jie Sun. A primal-dual interior-point method capable of rapidly detecting infeasibility for nonlinear programs. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020, 16 (2) : 1009-1035. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018190
[7]	Yixuan Yang, Yuchao Tang, Meng Wen, Tieyong Zeng. Preconditioned Douglas-Rachford type primal-dual method for solving composite monotone inclusion problems with applications. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2021, 15 (4) : 787-825. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2021014
[8]	Xiaojiao Tong, Felix F. Wu, Yongping Zhang, Zheng Yan, Yixin Ni. A semismooth Newton method for solving optimal power flow. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2007, 3 (3) : 553-567. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2007.3.553
[9]	Zhi-Feng Pang, Yu-Fei Yang. Semismooth Newton method for minimization of the LLT model. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2009, 3 (4) : 677-691. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2009.3.677
[10]	Kaifang Liu, Lunji Song, Shan Zhao. A new over-penalized weak galerkin method. Part Ⅰ: Second-order elliptic problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (5) : 2411-2428. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020184
[11]	Lunji Song, Wenya Qi, Kaifang Liu, Qingxian Gu. A new over-penalized weak galerkin finite element method. Part Ⅱ: Elliptic interface problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (5) : 2581-2598. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020196
[12]	Xiaojiao Tong, Shuzi Zhou. A smoothing projected Newton-type method for semismooth equations with bound constraints. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2005, 1 (2) : 235-250. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2005.1.235
[13]	Liqun Qi, Zheng yan, Hongxia Yin. Semismooth reformulation and Newton's method for the security region problem of power systems. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2008, 4 (1) : 143-153. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2008.4.143
[14]	Nadia Hazzam, Zakia Kebbiche. A primal-dual interior point method for $ P_{\ast }\left( \kappa \right) $-HLCP based on a class of parametric kernel functions. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2020 doi: 10.3934/naco.2020053
[15]	Liupeng Wang, Yunqing Huang. Error estimates for second-order SAV finite element method to phase field crystal model. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29 (1) : 1735-1752. doi: 10.3934/era.2020089
[16]	Matthias Gerdts, Stefan Horn, Sven-Joachim Kimmerle. Line search globalization of a semismooth Newton method for operator equations in Hilbert spaces with applications in optimal control. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (1) : 47-62. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016003
[17]	Liyan Ma, Lionel Moisan, Jian Yu, Tieyong Zeng. A stable method solving the total variation dictionary model with $L^\infty$ constraints. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2014, 8 (2) : 507-535. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2014.8.507
[18]	Chunlin Wu, Juyong Zhang, Xue-Cheng Tai. Augmented Lagrangian method for total variation restoration with non-quadratic fidelity. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2011, 5 (1) : 237-261. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2011.5.237
[19]	Jen-Yen Lin, Hui-Ju Chen, Ruey-Lin Sheu. Augmented Lagrange primal-dual approach for generalized fractional programming problems. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2013, 9 (4) : 723-741. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2013.9.723
[20]	Gianni Di Pillo, Giampaolo Liuzzi, Stefano Lucidi. A primal-dual algorithm for nonlinear programming exploiting negative curvature directions. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2011, 1 (3) : 509-528. doi: 10.3934/naco.2011.1.509

2019 Impact Factor: 1.373

American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

An adaptive finite element method in $L^2$-TV-based image denoising

References:

References:

Tools

Metrics

Other articles
by authors

Tools

Metrics

Other articles
by authors

American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

An adaptive finite element method in $L^2$-TV-based image denoising

References:

References:

Tools

Metrics

Other articlesby authors

Tools

Metrics

Other articlesby authors

Other articles
by authors

Other articles
by authors