An adaptive finite element method in $L^2$-TV-based image denoising

Michael Hintermüller; Monserrat Rincon-Camacho

doi:10.3934/ipi.2014.8.685

Previous Article
Stability of the determination of a coefficient for wave equations in an infinite waveguide
IPI Home
This Issue
Next Article
Resolution enhancement from scattering in passive sensor imaging with cross correlations

August 2014, 8(3): 685-711. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2014.8.685

An adaptive finite element method in $L^2$-TV-based image denoising

Michael Hintermüller ^1, and Monserrat Rincon-Camacho ^2,

1.	Department of Mathematics, Humboldt-University of Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany
2.	START-Project "Interfaces and Free Boundaries" and SFB "Mathematical Optimization and Applications in Biomedical Science", Institute of Mathematics and Scientific Computing, University of Graz, Heinrichstrasse 36, A-8010 Graz, Austria

Received October 2012 Revised June 2013 Published August 2014

Abstract
Related Papers

The first order optimality system of a total variation regularization based variational model with $L^2$-data-fitting in image denoising ($L^2$-TV problem) can be expressed as an elliptic variational inequality of the second kind. For a finite element discretization of the variational inequality problem, an a posteriori error residual based error estimator is derived and its reliability and (partial) efficiency are established. The results are applied to solve the $L^2$-TV problem by means of the adaptive finite element method. The adaptive mesh refinement relies on the newly derived a posteriori error estimator and on an additional heuristic providing a local variance estimator to cope with noisy data. The numerical solution of the discrete problem on each level of refinement is obtained by a superlinearly convergent algorithm based on Fenchel-duality and inexact semismooth Newton techniques and which is stable with respect to noise in the data. Numerical results justifying the advantage of adaptive finite elements solutions are presented.

Keywords: A posteriori error estimation, primal-dual method, adaptive finite elements, semismooth Newton method., elliptic variational inequality of the second kind, total variation.

Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 58F15, 58F17; Secondary: 53C3.

Citation: Michael Hintermüller, Monserrat Rincon-Camacho. An adaptive finite element method in $L^2$-TV-based image denoising. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2014, 8 (3) : 685-711. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2014.8.685

References:

[1]	R. Acar and C. R. Vogel, Analysis of bounded variation penalty methods for ill-posed problems,, Inverse Prolems, 10 (1994), 1217. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/10/6/003. Google Scholar
[2]	R. A. Adams and J. J. Fournier, Sobolev Spaces, volume 140., Academic Press, (2003). Google Scholar
[3]	M. Ainsworth and J. T. Oden, A Posteriori Error Estimation in Finite Element Analysis,, Wiley, (2000). doi: 10.1002/9781118032824. Google Scholar
[4]	J. Alberty, C. Carstensen and S. Funken, Remarks around 50 lines of matlab: Short finite element implementation,, Numerical Algorithms, 20 (1999), 117. doi: 10.1023/A:1019155918070. Google Scholar
[5]	A. Almansa, C. Ballester, V. Caselles and G. Haro, A TV based restoration model with local constraints,, Journal Scientific Computing, 34 (2008), 209. doi: 10.1007/s10915-007-9160-x. Google Scholar
[6]	W. Bangerth and A. Joshi, Adaptive finite element methods for the solution of inverse problems in optical tomography,, Inverse Problems, 24 (2008). doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/24/3/034011. Google Scholar
[7]	W. Bangerth and R. Rannacher, Adaptive Finite Element Methods for Differential Equations,, Birkhäuser, (2003). doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-7605-6. Google Scholar
[8]	E. Bänsch and K. Mikula, A coarsening finite element strategy in images selective smoothing,, Computing and Visualization in Science, 1 (1997), 53. Google Scholar
[9]	C. Bazan and P. Blomgren, Adaptive finite element method for image processing,, In Proceedings of the COMSOL Multiphysics Conference 2005 Boston, (2005). Google Scholar
[10]	E. C. Bingham, Fluidity and Plasticty,, International chemical series. McGraw-Hill Book Company, (1922). Google Scholar
[11]	V. Bostan, W. Han and B. D. Reddy, A posteriori error estimation and adaptive solution of elliptic variational inequalities of the second kind,, Applied Numerical Mathematics, 52 (2005), 13. doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2004.06.012. Google Scholar
[12]	D. Braess and R. Verfürth, A posteriori error estimators for the Raviart-Thomas element,, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 33 (1996), 2431. doi: 10.1137/S0036142994264079. Google Scholar
[13]	F. Brezzi and M. Fortin, Mixed and Hybrid Finite Element Methods,, Springer-Verlag, (1991). doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-3172-1. Google Scholar
[14]	A. Chambolle, An algorithm for total variation minimization and application,, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 20 (2004), 89. doi: 10.1023/B:JMIV.0000011321.19549.88. Google Scholar
[15]	A. Chambolle and P-L. Lions., Image recovery via total variation minimization and related problems,, Numerische Mathematik, 76 (1997), 167. doi: 10.1007/s002110050258. Google Scholar
[16]	Q. Chang and I-L. Chern, Acceleration methods for total variation-based image denoising,, SIAM J. Applied Mathematics, 25 (2003), 982. doi: 10.1137/S106482750241534X. Google Scholar
[17]	P. G. Ciarlet, The Finite Element Method for Elliptic Problems,, North Holland, (1978). Google Scholar
[18]	P. Clément, Approximation by finite element functions using local regularization,, RAIRO Analyse Numérique, 9 (1975), 77. Google Scholar
[19]	E. J. Dean, R. Glowinski and G. Guidoboni, On the numerical simulation of Bingham visco-plastic flow: Old and new results,, Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 142 (2007), 36. doi: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2006.09.002. Google Scholar
[20]	D. C. Dobson and C. R. Vogel, Convergence of an iterative method for total variation denoising,, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 34 (1997), 1779. doi: 10.1137/S003614299528701X. Google Scholar
[21]	Y. Dong, M. Hintermüller and M. M. Rincon-Camacho, Automated regularization parameter selection in multi-scale total variation models for image restoration,, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 40 (2011), 82. doi: 10.1007/s10851-010-0248-9. Google Scholar
[22]	G. Duvaut and J. L. Lions, Inequalities in Mechanics and Physics,, Springer-Verlag, (1976). Google Scholar
[23]	I. Ekeland and R. Témam, Convex Analysis and Variational Problems,, Classics Appl. Math. 28, (1999). doi: 10.1137/1.9781611971088. Google Scholar
[24]	X. Feng and A. Prohl, Analysis of total variation flow and its finite element approximations,, ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 37 (2003), 533. doi: 10.1051/m2an:2003041. Google Scholar
[25]	K. Frick and P. Marnitz, Statistical multiresolution dantzig estimation in imaging: Fundamental concepts and algorithmic framework,, Electronic Journal of Statistics, 6 (2012), 231. doi: 10.1214/12-EJS671. Google Scholar
[26]	K. Frick, P. Marnitz and A. Munk, Statistical multiresolution estimation for variational imaging: with an application in Poisson-biophotonics,, J. Math. Imaging Vision, 46 (2013), 370. doi: 10.1007/s10851-012-0368-5. Google Scholar
[27]	M. Fried, Multichannel image segmentation using adaptive finite elements,, Computing and Visualization in Science, 12 (2009), 125. doi: 10.1007/s00791-007-0082-9. Google Scholar
[28]	I. A. Frigaard and O. Scherzer, Uniaxial exchange flows of two Bingham fluids in a cylindrical duct,, IMA journal of applied mathematics, 61 (1998), 237. doi: 10.1093/imamat/61.3.237. Google Scholar
[29]	I. A. Frigaard and O. Scherzer, The effects of yield stress variation on uniaxial exchange flows of two Bingham fluids in a pipe,, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 60 (2000), 1950. doi: 10.1137/S0036139998335165. Google Scholar
[30]	E. Giusti, Minimal Surfaces and Functions of Bounded Variation,, Birkhäuser, (1984). doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-9486-0. Google Scholar
[31]	R. Glowinski, J. L. Lions and R. Trémolières, Analyse Numérique des Inéquations Variationelles,, Dunod, (1976). Google Scholar
[32]	E. J. Gumbel, Les valeurs extrêmes des distributions statistiques,, Annales de l'institut Henri Poincaré, 5 (1935), 115. Google Scholar
[33]	M. Guven et al, Effect of discretization error analysis and adaptive mesh generation in diffuse optical absorption imaging: I,, Inverse Problems, 23 (2007), 1115. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/23/3/017. Google Scholar
[34]	M. Guven et al, Discretization error analysis and adaptive meshing algorithms for fluorescence diffuse optical tomography: Part I,, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., 29 (2010), 217. Google Scholar
[35]	E. Haber, S. Heldmann and U. Ascher, Adaptive finite volume method for distributed non-smooth parameter identification,, Inverse Problems, 23 (2007), 1659. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/23/4/017. Google Scholar
[36]	E. Haber, S. Heldmann and J. Modersitzki, An octree method for parametric image registration,, SIAM J. on Scientific Computing, 29 (2007), 2008. doi: 10.1137/060662605. Google Scholar
[37]	E. Haber, S. Heldmann and J. Modersitzki, Adaptive mesh refinement for non parametric image registration,, SIAM J. on Scientific Computing, 30 (2008), 3012. doi: 10.1137/070687724. Google Scholar
[38]	E. Hashrova, Z. Kabluchko and A. Wübker, Extremes of independent chi-square random vectors,, Extremes, 15 (2012), 35. doi: 10.1007/s10687-010-0125-3. Google Scholar
[39]	M. Hintermüller, R. H. W. Hoppe, Y. Iliash and M. Kieweg, An a posteriori error analysis of adaptive finite element methods for distributed elliptic control problems with control constraints,, ESAIM: COCV, 14 (2008), 540. doi: 10.1051/cocv:2007057. Google Scholar
[40]	M. Hintermüller, K. Ito and K. Kunisch, The primal-dual active set strategy as a semismooth newton method,, SIAM Journal on Optimization, 13 (2002), 865. doi: 10.1137/S1052623401383558. Google Scholar
[41]	M. Hintermüller and K. Kunisch, Total bounded variation regularization as bilaterally constrained optimization problem,, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 64 (2004), 1311. doi: 10.1137/S0036139903422784. Google Scholar
[42]	M. Hintermüller and G. Stadler, An infeasible primal-dual algorithm for total bounded variation-based inf-convolution-type image restoration,, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 28 (2006), 1. doi: 10.1137/040613263. Google Scholar
[43]	T. Hotz, P. Marnitz, R. Stichtenoth, L. Davies, Z. Kabluchko and A. Munk, Locally adaptive image denoising by a statistical multiresolution criterion,, Comput. Stat. Data Anal., 56 (2012), 543. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2011.08.018. Google Scholar
[44]	S. Osher, M. Burger, D. Goldfarb, J. Xu and W. Yin, An iterative regularization method for total variation-based image restoration,, SIAM Multiscale Model. and Simu., 4 (2005), 460. doi: 10.1137/040605412. Google Scholar
[45]	T. Preusser and M. Rumpf, An adaptive finite element method for large scale image processing,, In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Scale-Space Theories in Computer Vision, (): 223. Google Scholar
[46]	N. Roquet and P. Saramito, An adaptive finite element method for bingham fluid flows around a cylinder,, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 192 (2003), 3317. doi: 10.1016/S0045-7825(03)00262-7. Google Scholar
[47]	L. I. Rudin, S. Osher and E. Fatemi, Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms,, Physica D, 60 (1992), 259. doi: 10.1016/0167-2789(92)90242-F. Google Scholar
[48]	L. Rudin, MTV-multiscale Total Variation Principle for a Pde-based Solution to Nonsmooth Ill-posed Problem,, Technical report, (1995). Google Scholar
[49]	D. Strong and T. Chan, Spatially and Scale Adaptive Total Variation Based Regularization and Anisotropic Diffusion in Image Processing,, Technical report, (1996). Google Scholar
[50]	D. Strong and T. Chan, Edge-preserving and scale-dependent properties of total variation regularization,, Inverse Problems, 19 (2003). doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/19/6/059. Google Scholar
[51]	R. Temam, Navier-Stokes Equations,, North-Holland, (1977). Google Scholar
[52]	R. Verfürth, A Review of A Posteriori Error Estimation and Adaptive Mesh Refinement Techniques,, Wiley Teubner, (1996). Google Scholar
[53]	C. R. Vogel, Computational Methods for Inverse Problems, volume 23 of Frontiers Appl. Math., SIAM-Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics, (2002). doi: 10.1137/1.9780898717570. Google Scholar
[54]	G. Winkler, Image Analysis, Random Fields And Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods: A Mathematical Introduction,, Applications of mathematics. Springer, (2003). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-55760-6. Google Scholar

show all references

References:

[1]	R. Acar and C. R. Vogel, Analysis of bounded variation penalty methods for ill-posed problems,, Inverse Prolems, 10 (1994), 1217. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/10/6/003. Google Scholar
[2]	R. A. Adams and J. J. Fournier, Sobolev Spaces, volume 140., Academic Press, (2003). Google Scholar
[3]	M. Ainsworth and J. T. Oden, A Posteriori Error Estimation in Finite Element Analysis,, Wiley, (2000). doi: 10.1002/9781118032824. Google Scholar
[4]	J. Alberty, C. Carstensen and S. Funken, Remarks around 50 lines of matlab: Short finite element implementation,, Numerical Algorithms, 20 (1999), 117. doi: 10.1023/A:1019155918070. Google Scholar
[5]	A. Almansa, C. Ballester, V. Caselles and G. Haro, A TV based restoration model with local constraints,, Journal Scientific Computing, 34 (2008), 209. doi: 10.1007/s10915-007-9160-x. Google Scholar
[6]	W. Bangerth and A. Joshi, Adaptive finite element methods for the solution of inverse problems in optical tomography,, Inverse Problems, 24 (2008). doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/24/3/034011. Google Scholar
[7]	W. Bangerth and R. Rannacher, Adaptive Finite Element Methods for Differential Equations,, Birkhäuser, (2003). doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-7605-6. Google Scholar
[8]	E. Bänsch and K. Mikula, A coarsening finite element strategy in images selective smoothing,, Computing and Visualization in Science, 1 (1997), 53. Google Scholar
[9]	C. Bazan and P. Blomgren, Adaptive finite element method for image processing,, In Proceedings of the COMSOL Multiphysics Conference 2005 Boston, (2005). Google Scholar
[10]	E. C. Bingham, Fluidity and Plasticty,, International chemical series. McGraw-Hill Book Company, (1922). Google Scholar
[11]	V. Bostan, W. Han and B. D. Reddy, A posteriori error estimation and adaptive solution of elliptic variational inequalities of the second kind,, Applied Numerical Mathematics, 52 (2005), 13. doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2004.06.012. Google Scholar
[12]	D. Braess and R. Verfürth, A posteriori error estimators for the Raviart-Thomas element,, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 33 (1996), 2431. doi: 10.1137/S0036142994264079. Google Scholar
[13]	F. Brezzi and M. Fortin, Mixed and Hybrid Finite Element Methods,, Springer-Verlag, (1991). doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-3172-1. Google Scholar
[14]	A. Chambolle, An algorithm for total variation minimization and application,, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 20 (2004), 89. doi: 10.1023/B:JMIV.0000011321.19549.88. Google Scholar
[15]	A. Chambolle and P-L. Lions., Image recovery via total variation minimization and related problems,, Numerische Mathematik, 76 (1997), 167. doi: 10.1007/s002110050258. Google Scholar
[16]	Q. Chang and I-L. Chern, Acceleration methods for total variation-based image denoising,, SIAM J. Applied Mathematics, 25 (2003), 982. doi: 10.1137/S106482750241534X. Google Scholar
[17]	P. G. Ciarlet, The Finite Element Method for Elliptic Problems,, North Holland, (1978). Google Scholar
[18]	P. Clément, Approximation by finite element functions using local regularization,, RAIRO Analyse Numérique, 9 (1975), 77. Google Scholar
[19]	E. J. Dean, R. Glowinski and G. Guidoboni, On the numerical simulation of Bingham visco-plastic flow: Old and new results,, Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 142 (2007), 36. doi: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2006.09.002. Google Scholar
[20]	D. C. Dobson and C. R. Vogel, Convergence of an iterative method for total variation denoising,, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 34 (1997), 1779. doi: 10.1137/S003614299528701X. Google Scholar
[21]	Y. Dong, M. Hintermüller and M. M. Rincon-Camacho, Automated regularization parameter selection in multi-scale total variation models for image restoration,, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 40 (2011), 82. doi: 10.1007/s10851-010-0248-9. Google Scholar
[22]	G. Duvaut and J. L. Lions, Inequalities in Mechanics and Physics,, Springer-Verlag, (1976). Google Scholar
[23]	I. Ekeland and R. Témam, Convex Analysis and Variational Problems,, Classics Appl. Math. 28, (1999). doi: 10.1137/1.9781611971088. Google Scholar
[24]	X. Feng and A. Prohl, Analysis of total variation flow and its finite element approximations,, ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 37 (2003), 533. doi: 10.1051/m2an:2003041. Google Scholar
[25]	K. Frick and P. Marnitz, Statistical multiresolution dantzig estimation in imaging: Fundamental concepts and algorithmic framework,, Electronic Journal of Statistics, 6 (2012), 231. doi: 10.1214/12-EJS671. Google Scholar
[26]	K. Frick, P. Marnitz and A. Munk, Statistical multiresolution estimation for variational imaging: with an application in Poisson-biophotonics,, J. Math. Imaging Vision, 46 (2013), 370. doi: 10.1007/s10851-012-0368-5. Google Scholar
[27]	M. Fried, Multichannel image segmentation using adaptive finite elements,, Computing and Visualization in Science, 12 (2009), 125. doi: 10.1007/s00791-007-0082-9. Google Scholar
[28]	I. A. Frigaard and O. Scherzer, Uniaxial exchange flows of two Bingham fluids in a cylindrical duct,, IMA journal of applied mathematics, 61 (1998), 237. doi: 10.1093/imamat/61.3.237. Google Scholar
[29]	I. A. Frigaard and O. Scherzer, The effects of yield stress variation on uniaxial exchange flows of two Bingham fluids in a pipe,, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 60 (2000), 1950. doi: 10.1137/S0036139998335165. Google Scholar
[30]	E. Giusti, Minimal Surfaces and Functions of Bounded Variation,, Birkhäuser, (1984). doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-9486-0. Google Scholar
[31]	R. Glowinski, J. L. Lions and R. Trémolières, Analyse Numérique des Inéquations Variationelles,, Dunod, (1976). Google Scholar
[32]	E. J. Gumbel, Les valeurs extrêmes des distributions statistiques,, Annales de l'institut Henri Poincaré, 5 (1935), 115. Google Scholar
[33]	M. Guven et al, Effect of discretization error analysis and adaptive mesh generation in diffuse optical absorption imaging: I,, Inverse Problems, 23 (2007), 1115. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/23/3/017. Google Scholar
[34]	M. Guven et al, Discretization error analysis and adaptive meshing algorithms for fluorescence diffuse optical tomography: Part I,, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., 29 (2010), 217. Google Scholar
[35]	E. Haber, S. Heldmann and U. Ascher, Adaptive finite volume method for distributed non-smooth parameter identification,, Inverse Problems, 23 (2007), 1659. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/23/4/017. Google Scholar
[36]	E. Haber, S. Heldmann and J. Modersitzki, An octree method for parametric image registration,, SIAM J. on Scientific Computing, 29 (2007), 2008. doi: 10.1137/060662605. Google Scholar
[37]	E. Haber, S. Heldmann and J. Modersitzki, Adaptive mesh refinement for non parametric image registration,, SIAM J. on Scientific Computing, 30 (2008), 3012. doi: 10.1137/070687724. Google Scholar
[38]	E. Hashrova, Z. Kabluchko and A. Wübker, Extremes of independent chi-square random vectors,, Extremes, 15 (2012), 35. doi: 10.1007/s10687-010-0125-3. Google Scholar
[39]	M. Hintermüller, R. H. W. Hoppe, Y. Iliash and M. Kieweg, An a posteriori error analysis of adaptive finite element methods for distributed elliptic control problems with control constraints,, ESAIM: COCV, 14 (2008), 540. doi: 10.1051/cocv:2007057. Google Scholar
[40]	M. Hintermüller, K. Ito and K. Kunisch, The primal-dual active set strategy as a semismooth newton method,, SIAM Journal on Optimization, 13 (2002), 865. doi: 10.1137/S1052623401383558. Google Scholar
[41]	M. Hintermüller and K. Kunisch, Total bounded variation regularization as bilaterally constrained optimization problem,, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 64 (2004), 1311. doi: 10.1137/S0036139903422784. Google Scholar
[42]	M. Hintermüller and G. Stadler, An infeasible primal-dual algorithm for total bounded variation-based inf-convolution-type image restoration,, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 28 (2006), 1. doi: 10.1137/040613263. Google Scholar
[43]	T. Hotz, P. Marnitz, R. Stichtenoth, L. Davies, Z. Kabluchko and A. Munk, Locally adaptive image denoising by a statistical multiresolution criterion,, Comput. Stat. Data Anal., 56 (2012), 543. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2011.08.018. Google Scholar
[44]	S. Osher, M. Burger, D. Goldfarb, J. Xu and W. Yin, An iterative regularization method for total variation-based image restoration,, SIAM Multiscale Model. and Simu., 4 (2005), 460. doi: 10.1137/040605412. Google Scholar
[45]	T. Preusser and M. Rumpf, An adaptive finite element method for large scale image processing,, In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Scale-Space Theories in Computer Vision, (): 223. Google Scholar
[46]	N. Roquet and P. Saramito, An adaptive finite element method for bingham fluid flows around a cylinder,, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 192 (2003), 3317. doi: 10.1016/S0045-7825(03)00262-7. Google Scholar
[47]	L. I. Rudin, S. Osher and E. Fatemi, Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms,, Physica D, 60 (1992), 259. doi: 10.1016/0167-2789(92)90242-F. Google Scholar
[48]	L. Rudin, MTV-multiscale Total Variation Principle for a Pde-based Solution to Nonsmooth Ill-posed Problem,, Technical report, (1995). Google Scholar
[49]	D. Strong and T. Chan, Spatially and Scale Adaptive Total Variation Based Regularization and Anisotropic Diffusion in Image Processing,, Technical report, (1996). Google Scholar
[50]	D. Strong and T. Chan, Edge-preserving and scale-dependent properties of total variation regularization,, Inverse Problems, 19 (2003). doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/19/6/059. Google Scholar
[51]	R. Temam, Navier-Stokes Equations,, North-Holland, (1977). Google Scholar
[52]	R. Verfürth, A Review of A Posteriori Error Estimation and Adaptive Mesh Refinement Techniques,, Wiley Teubner, (1996). Google Scholar
[53]	C. R. Vogel, Computational Methods for Inverse Problems, volume 23 of Frontiers Appl. Math., SIAM-Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics, (2002). doi: 10.1137/1.9780898717570. Google Scholar
[54]	G. Winkler, Image Analysis, Random Fields And Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods: A Mathematical Introduction,, Applications of mathematics. Springer, (2003). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-55760-6. Google Scholar

[1]	Shenglan Xie, Maoan Han, Peng Zhu. A posteriori error estimate of weak Galerkin fem for second order elliptic problem with mixed boundary condition. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020 doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020340
[2]	Gang Bao, Mingming Zhang, Bin Hu, Peijun Li. An adaptive finite element DtN method for the three-dimensional acoustic scattering problem. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020 doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020351
[3]	Zuliang Lu, Fei Huang, Xiankui Wu, Lin Li, Shang Liu. Convergence and quasi-optimality of $ L^2- $norms based an adaptive finite element method for nonlinear optimal control problems. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (4) : 1459-1486. doi: 10.3934/era.2020077
[4]	Li-Bin Liu, Ying Liang, Jian Zhang, Xiaobing Bao. A robust adaptive grid method for singularly perturbed Burger-Huxley equations. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (4) : 1439-1457. doi: 10.3934/era.2020076
[5]	Alberto Bressan, Wen Shen. A posteriori error estimates for self-similar solutions to the Euler equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (1) : 113-130. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020168
[6]	Zexuan Liu, Zhiyuan Sun, Jerry Zhijian Yang. A numerical study of superconvergence of the discontinuous Galerkin method by patch reconstruction. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (4) : 1487-1501. doi: 10.3934/era.2020078
[7]	Yuxia Guo, Shaolong Peng. A direct method of moving planes for fully nonlinear nonlocal operators and applications. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020 doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020462
[8]	Noah Stevenson, Ian Tice. A truncated real interpolation method and characterizations of screened Sobolev spaces. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (12) : 5509-5566. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020250
[9]	Leilei Wei, Yinnian He. A fully discrete local discontinuous Galerkin method with the generalized numerical flux to solve the tempered fractional reaction-diffusion equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020 doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020319
[10]	Marion Darbas, Jérémy Heleine, Stephanie Lohrengel. Numerical resolution by the quasi-reversibility method of a data completion problem for Maxwell's equations. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2020, 14 (6) : 1107-1133. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020056
[11]	Yifan Chen, Thomas Y. Hou. Function approximation via the subsampled Poincaré inequality. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (1) : 169-199. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020296
[12]	Zonghong Cao, Jie Min. Selection and impact of decision mode of encroachment and retail service in a dual-channel supply chain. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020167
[13]	Aihua Fan, Jörg Schmeling, Weixiao Shen. $ L^\infty $-estimation of generalized Thue-Morse trigonometric polynomials and ergodic maximization. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (1) : 297-327. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020363
[14]	Lingfeng Li, Shousheng Luo, Xue-Cheng Tai, Jiang Yang. A new variational approach based on level-set function for convex hull problem with outliers. Inverse Problems & Imaging, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020070
[15]	Weisong Dong, Chang Li. Second order estimates for complex Hessian equations on Hermitian manifolds. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020 doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020377
[16]	Xuefei He, Kun Wang, Liwei Xu. Efficient finite difference methods for the nonlinear Helmholtz equation in Kerr medium. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (4) : 1503-1528. doi: 10.3934/era.2020079
[17]	Anton A. Kutsenko. Isomorphism between one-Dimensional and multidimensional finite difference operators. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020270
[18]	Hua Chen, Yawei Wei. Multiple solutions for nonlinear cone degenerate elliptic equations. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020272
[19]	Shasha Hu, Yihong Xu, Yuhan Zhang. Second-Order characterizations for set-valued equilibrium problems with variable ordering structures. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020164
[20]	Soniya Singh, Sumit Arora, Manil T. Mohan, Jaydev Dabas. Approximate controllability of second order impulsive systems with state-dependent delay in Banach spaces. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2020 doi: 10.3934/eect.2020103

2019 Impact Factor: 1.373

American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

An adaptive finite element method in $L^2$-TV-based image denoising

References:

References:

Tools

Metrics

Other articles
by authors

Tools

Metrics

Other articles
by authors

American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

An adaptive finite element method in $L^2$-TV-based image denoising

References:

References:

Tools

Metrics

Other articlesby authors

Tools

Metrics

Other articlesby authors

Other articles
by authors

Other articles
by authors