On the set of metrics without local limiting Carleman weights

Previous Article
A source time reversal method for seismicity induced by mining
IPI Home
This Issue
Next Article
Reducing spatially varying out-of-focus blur from natural image

January 2017, 11(1): 47-64. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2017003

On the set of metrics without local limiting Carleman weights

E.T.S de Ingenieros Navales, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Avd. Arco de la Victoria, No4, Ciudad Universitaria Madrid -28040, Spain

Received July 2015 Revised November 2016 Published January 2017

Fund Project: The author was supported by research grant ERC 301179

In the paper [1] it is shown that the set of Riemannian metrics which do not admit global limiting Carleman weights is open and dense, by studying the conformally invariant Weyl and Cotton tensors. In the paper [7] it is shown that the set of Riemannian metrics which do not admit local limiting Carleman weights at any point is residual, showing that it contains the set of metrics for which there are no local conformal diffeomorphisms between any distinct open subsets. This paper is a continuation of [1], in order to prove that the set of Riemannian metrics which do not admit local limiting Carleman weights at any point is open and dense.

Keywords: Limiting Carleman weight, Calderón problem, transversality, Riemannian geometry, conformal geometry.

Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 35R30; Secondary: 53A30.

Citation: Pablo Angulo-Ardoy. On the set of metrics without local limiting Carleman weights. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2017, 11 (1) : 47-64. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2017003

References:

[1]	P. Angulo-Ardoy, D. Faraco, L. Guijarro and A. Ruiz, Obstructions to the existence of limiting Carleman weights, Analysis & PDE, 9 (2016), 575-595. doi: 10.2140/apde.2016.9.575. Google Scholar
[2]	P. Angulo-Ardoy, D. Faraco and L. Guijarro, Sufficient Conditions for the Existence of Limiting Carleman Weights arXiv: 1603.04201 Google Scholar
[3]	J. Bochnak, M. Coste and M. -F. Roy, Real Algebraic Geometry Springer, 1998. Google Scholar
[4]	D. Dos Santos Ferreira, C. E. Kenig, M. Salo and G. Uhlmann, Limiting Carleman weights and anisotropic inverse problems, Invent. Math., 178 (2009), 119-171. doi: 10.1007/s00222-009-0196-4. Google Scholar
[5]	M. Hirsch, Differential Topology Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 33. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1976. Google Scholar
[6]	S. Koike and M. Shiota, Non-smooth points set of fibres of a semialgebraic mapping, J. Math. Soc. Japan, 59 (2007), 953-969. doi: 10.2969/jmsj/05940953. Google Scholar
[7]	T. Liimatainen and M. Salo, Nowhere conformally homogeneous manifolds and limiting Carleman weights, Inverse Probl. Imaging, 6 (2012), 523-530. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2012.6.523. Google Scholar
[8]	C. T. C. Wall, Regular stratifications, Proceedings of "Applications of Topology and Dynamical Systems" at Warwick, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 468 (1975), 332-345. Google Scholar

show all references

References:

[1]	P. Angulo-Ardoy, D. Faraco, L. Guijarro and A. Ruiz, Obstructions to the existence of limiting Carleman weights, Analysis & PDE, 9 (2016), 575-595. doi: 10.2140/apde.2016.9.575. Google Scholar
[2]	P. Angulo-Ardoy, D. Faraco and L. Guijarro, Sufficient Conditions for the Existence of Limiting Carleman Weights arXiv: 1603.04201 Google Scholar
[3]	J. Bochnak, M. Coste and M. -F. Roy, Real Algebraic Geometry Springer, 1998. Google Scholar
[4]	D. Dos Santos Ferreira, C. E. Kenig, M. Salo and G. Uhlmann, Limiting Carleman weights and anisotropic inverse problems, Invent. Math., 178 (2009), 119-171. doi: 10.1007/s00222-009-0196-4. Google Scholar
[5]	M. Hirsch, Differential Topology Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 33. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1976. Google Scholar
[6]	S. Koike and M. Shiota, Non-smooth points set of fibres of a semialgebraic mapping, J. Math. Soc. Japan, 59 (2007), 953-969. doi: 10.2969/jmsj/05940953. Google Scholar
[7]	T. Liimatainen and M. Salo, Nowhere conformally homogeneous manifolds and limiting Carleman weights, Inverse Probl. Imaging, 6 (2012), 523-530. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2012.6.523. Google Scholar
[8]	C. T. C. Wall, Regular stratifications, Proceedings of "Applications of Topology and Dynamical Systems" at Warwick, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 468 (1975), 332-345. Google Scholar

[1]	Petteri Piiroinen, Martin Simon. Probabilistic interpretation of the Calderón problem. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2017, 11 (3) : 553-575. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2017026
[2]	Pedro Caro, Mikko Salo. Stability of the Calderón problem in admissible geometries. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2014, 8 (4) : 939-957. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2014.8.939
[3]	Oleg Yu. Imanuvilov, Masahiro Yamamoto. Calderón problem for Maxwell's equations in cylindrical domain. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2014, 8 (4) : 1117-1137. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2014.8.1117
[4]	Albert Clop, Daniel Faraco, Alberto Ruiz. Stability of Calderón's inverse conductivity problem in the plane for discontinuous conductivities. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2010, 4 (1) : 49-91. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2010.4.49
[5]	Yernat M. Assylbekov. Reconstruction in the partial data Calderón problem on admissible manifolds. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2017, 11 (3) : 455-476. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2017021
[6]	Matteo Santacesaria. Note on Calderón's inverse problem for measurable conductivities. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2019, 13 (1) : 149-157. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2019008
[7]	Erlend Grong, Alexander Vasil’ev. Sub-Riemannian and sub-Lorentzian geometry on $SU(1,1)$ and on its universal cover. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2011, 3 (2) : 225-260. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2011.3.225
[8]	Daniel Genin, Serge Tabachnikov. On configuration spaces of plane polygons, sub-Riemannian geometry and periodic orbits of outer billiards. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2007, 1 (2) : 155-173. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2007.1.155
[9]	Stefan Sommer, Anne Marie Svane. Modelling anisotropic covariance using stochastic development and sub-Riemannian frame bundle geometry. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2017, 9 (3) : 391-410. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2017015
[10]	Yunlong Huang, P. S. Krishnaprasad. Sub-Riemannian geometry and finite time thermodynamics Part 1: The stochastic oscillator. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 0 (0) : 1-26. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020072
[11]	Tony Liimatainen, Mikko Salo. Nowhere conformally homogeneous manifolds and limiting Carleman weights. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2012, 6 (3) : 523-530. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2012.6.523
[12]	Annalisa Iuorio, Christian Kuehn, Peter Szmolyan. Geometry and numerical continuation of multiscale orbits in a nonconvex variational problem. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 0 (0) : 1-22. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020073
[13]	Alex L Castro, Wyatt Howard, Corey Shanbrom. Bridges between subriemannian geometry and algebraic geometry: Now and then. Conference Publications, 2015, 2015 (special) : 239-247. doi: 10.3934/proc.2015.0239
[14]	Fabrice Delbary, Kim Knudsen. Numerical nonlinear complex geometrical optics algorithm for the 3D Calderón problem. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2014, 8 (4) : 991-1012. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2014.8.991
[15]	Angkana Rüland, Eva Sincich. Lipschitz stability for the finite dimensional fractional Calderón problem with finite Cauchy data. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2019, 13 (5) : 1023-1044. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2019046
[16]	Joachim Escher, Boris Kolev, Marcus Wunsch. The geometry of a vorticity model equation. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2012, 11 (4) : 1407-1419. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2012.11.1407
[17]	Janina Kotus, Mariusz Urbański. The dynamics and geometry of the Fatou functions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2005, 13 (2) : 291-338. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2005.13.291
[18]	Jean-Marc Couveignes, Reynald Lercier. The geometry of some parameterizations and encodings. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2014, 8 (4) : 437-458. doi: 10.3934/amc.2014.8.437
[19]	Yong Lin, Gábor Lippner, Dan Mangoubi, Shing-Tung Yau. Nodal geometry of graphs on surfaces. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2010, 28 (3) : 1291-1298. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.28.1291
[20]	Katarzyna Grabowska, Paweƚ Urbański. Geometry of Routh reduction. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2019, 11 (1) : 23-44. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2019002

American Institute of Mathematical Sciences