# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

August  2019, 13(4): 755-786. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2019035

## Total generalized variation regularization in data assimilation for Burgers' equation

 1 Research Center of Mathematical Modelling (MODEMAT), Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Quito, Ecuador 2 Faculty of Mathematics, Professorship Numerical Mathematics (Partial Differential Equations), Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz, Germany

This paper was developed within the Master Program in Mathematical Optimization at Escuela Politécnica Nacional de Ecuador

Received  May 2018 Revised  November 2018 Published  May 2019

We propose a second-order total generalized variation (TGV) regularization for the reconstruction of the initial condition in variational data assimilation problems. After showing the equivalence between TGV regularization and a Bayesian MAP estimator, we focus on the detailed study of the inviscid Burgers' data assimilation problem. Due to the difficult structure of the governing hyperbolic conservation law, we consider a discretize–then–optimize approach and rigorously derive a first-order optimality condition for the problem. For the numerical solution, we propose a globalized reduced Newton-type method together with a polynomial line-search strategy, and prove convergence of the algorithm to stationary points. The paper finishes with some numerical experiments where, among others, the performance of TGV–regularization compared to TV–regularization is tested.

Citation: Juan Carlos De los Reyes, Estefanía Loayza-Romero. Total generalized variation regularization in data assimilation for Burgers' equation. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2019, 13 (4) : 755-786. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2019035
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
Exact solution
SSIM index for the TV and TGV regularizations
Best solutions for TV (left) and TGV (right) regularizations
Observations vs Optimal state
Exact solutions and best solutions obtained for the experiment
Global convergence of the algorithm
Locally superlinear convergence of the algorithm
Exact solutions for the experiment
Results of the experiments with different values of $\mu$
 Experiment $\mu$ iter SSIM $J_\gamma$ time (s) 3 0 – NaN NaN – 1e-6 13 0.9594 35.8330 7.2 1e-8 12 0.9594 35.8330 6.9 1e-10 12 0.9594 35.8330 6.9 1e-12 13 0.9594 35.8333 7.1 1e-14 13 0.9594 35.8329 7.1 4 0 – NaN NaN – 1e-6 14 0.9592 39.2436 7.6 1e-8 13 0.9592 39.2434 7.0 1e-10 13 0.9592 39.2434 7.0 1e-12 14 0.9591 39.2437 7.7 1e-14 16 0.9591 39.2439 9.1
 Experiment $\mu$ iter SSIM $J_\gamma$ time (s) 3 0 – NaN NaN – 1e-6 13 0.9594 35.8330 7.2 1e-8 12 0.9594 35.8330 6.9 1e-10 12 0.9594 35.8330 6.9 1e-12 13 0.9594 35.8333 7.1 1e-14 13 0.9594 35.8329 7.1 4 0 – NaN NaN – 1e-6 14 0.9592 39.2436 7.6 1e-8 13 0.9592 39.2434 7.0 1e-10 13 0.9592 39.2434 7.0 1e-12 14 0.9591 39.2437 7.7 1e-14 16 0.9591 39.2439 9.1
Summary of the experiment
 Observations M N $\sigma$ 0.1 0.01 0.001 iter SSIM iter SSIM iter SSIM 4 75 40 20 0.9573 12 0.9895 12 0.9985 9 50 20 19 0.9576 12 0.9895 11 0.9985 30 25 10 20 0.9581 14 0.9896 11 0.9985 40 20 10 19 0.9584 15 0.9896 12 0.9985 100 15 5 15 0.9604 12 0.9896 11 0.9985 150 10 5 20 0.9617 13 0.9897 11 0.9985
 Observations M N $\sigma$ 0.1 0.01 0.001 iter SSIM iter SSIM iter SSIM 4 75 40 20 0.9573 12 0.9895 12 0.9985 9 50 20 19 0.9576 12 0.9895 11 0.9985 30 25 10 20 0.9581 14 0.9896 11 0.9985 40 20 10 19 0.9584 15 0.9896 12 0.9985 100 15 5 15 0.9604 12 0.9896 11 0.9985 150 10 5 20 0.9617 13 0.9897 11 0.9985
 [1] Xin Guo, Lei Shi. Preface of the special issue on analysis in data science: Methods and applications. Mathematical Foundations of Computing, 2020, 3 (4) : i-ii. doi: 10.3934/mfc.2020026 [2] Shasha Hu, Yihong Xu, Yuhan Zhang. Second-Order characterizations for set-valued equilibrium problems with variable ordering structures. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020164 [3] Liupeng Wang, Yunqing Huang. Error estimates for second-order SAV finite element method to phase field crystal model. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29 (1) : 1735-1752. doi: 10.3934/era.2020089 [4] Ying Lv, Yan-Fang Xue, Chun-Lei Tang. Ground state homoclinic orbits for a class of asymptotically periodic second-order Hamiltonian systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (3) : 1627-1652. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020176 [5] Baoli Yin, Yang Liu, Hong Li, Zhimin Zhang. Approximation methods for the distributed order calculus using the convolution quadrature. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (3) : 1447-1468. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020168 [6] Xuefei He, Kun Wang, Liwei Xu. Efficient finite difference methods for the nonlinear Helmholtz equation in Kerr medium. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (4) : 1503-1528. doi: 10.3934/era.2020079 [7] Yuyuan Ouyang, Trevor Squires. Some worst-case datasets of deterministic first-order methods for solving binary logistic regression. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2021, 15 (1) : 63-77. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020047 [8] Van Duong Dinh. Random data theory for the cubic fourth-order nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020284 [9] Philippe G. Ciarlet, Liliana Gratie, Cristinel Mardare. Intrinsic methods in elasticity: a mathematical survey. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2009, 23 (1&2) : 133-164. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.23.133 [10] Oleg Yu. Imanuvilov, Jean Pierre Puel. On global controllability of 2-D Burgers equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2009, 23 (1&2) : 299-313. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.23.299 [11] Geir Evensen, Javier Amezcua, Marc Bocquet, Alberto Carrassi, Alban Farchi, Alison Fowler, Pieter L. Houtekamer, Christopher K. Jones, Rafael J. de Moraes, Manuel Pulido, Christian Sampson, Femke C. Vossepoel. An international initiative of predicting the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic using ensemble data assimilation. Foundations of Data Science, 2020  doi: 10.3934/fods.2021001 [12] Predrag S. Stanimirović, Branislav Ivanov, Haifeng Ma, Dijana Mosić. A survey of gradient methods for solving nonlinear optimization. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (4) : 1573-1624. doi: 10.3934/era.2020115 [13] Xing-Bin Pan. Variational and operator methods for Maxwell-Stokes system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020, 40 (6) : 3909-3955. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020036 [14] Taige Wang, Bing-Yu Zhang. Forced oscillation of viscous Burgers' equation with a time-periodic force. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (2) : 1205-1221. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020160 [15] Weisong Dong, Chang Li. Second order estimates for complex Hessian equations on Hermitian manifolds. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020377 [16] Shun Zhang, Jianlin Jiang, Su Zhang, Yibing Lv, Yuzhen Guo. ADMM-type methods for generalized multi-facility Weber problem. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020171 [17] Bin Wang, Lin Mu. Viscosity robust weak Galerkin finite element methods for Stokes problems. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29 (1) : 1881-1895. doi: 10.3934/era.2020096 [18] Jiwei Jia, Young-Ju Lee, Yue Feng, Zichan Wang, Zhongshu Zhao. Hybridized weak Galerkin finite element methods for Brinkman equations. Electronic Research Archive, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/era.2020126 [19] Shenglan Xie, Maoan Han, Peng Zhu. A posteriori error estimate of weak Galerkin fem for second order elliptic problem with mixed boundary condition. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020340 [20] Soniya Singh, Sumit Arora, Manil T. Mohan, Jaydev Dabas. Approximate controllability of second order impulsive systems with state-dependent delay in Banach spaces. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2020  doi: 10.3934/eect.2020103

2019 Impact Factor: 1.373