Advanced Search
Article Contents
Article Contents

Two gesture-computing approaches by using electromagnetic waves

  • * Corresponding authors: Jingzhi Li and Hongyu Liu

    * Corresponding authors: Jingzhi Li and Hongyu Liu 
Abstract Full Text(HTML) Figure(7) / Table(1) Related Papers Cited by
  • We are concerned with a novel sensor-based gesture input/ instruction technology which enables human beings to interact with computers conveniently. The human being wears an emitter on the finger or holds a digital pen that generates a time harmonic point charge. The inputs/instructions are performed through moving the finger or the digital pen. The computer recognizes the instruction by determining the motion trajectory of the dynamic point charge from the collected electromagnetic field measurement data. The identification process is mathematically modelled as a dynamic inverse source problem for time-dependent Maxwell's equations. From a practical point of view, the point source should be assumed to move in an unknown inhomogeneous background medium, which models the human body and the surroundings. Moreover, a salient feature is that the electromagnetic radiated data are only collected in a limited aperture. For the inverse problem, we develop, from the respectively deterministic and stochastic viewpoints, a dynamic direct sampling method and a modified particle filter method. Both approaches can effectively recover the motion trajectory. Rigorous theoretical justifications are presented for the mathematical modelling and the proposed recovery methods. Extensive numerical experiments are conducted to illustrate the promising features of the two proposed recognition approaches.

    Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 35R30, 35P25; Secondary: 78A46.


    \begin{equation} \\ \end{equation}
  • 加载中
  • Figure 1.  Schematic illustration of the proposed input/ instruction technology using a moving emitter

    Figure 2.  The measurement points and human being's motion domain

    Figure 3.  Reconstruction of the trajectory "C". (a) exact moving trajectory in the homogeneous medium, (b) exact moving trajectory in the inhomogeneous medium, (c), (d), (e), the electric field in the three components with the receiver at $ (2,2,1) $, where the red solid line denotes the homogeneous medium and the blue dotted line denotes the inhomogeneous medium, (f) the relationship between the $ \alpha $ and the error, (g) reconstruction by the particle filter method in the homogeneous medium, (h) reconstruction by the particle filter method in the inhomogeneous medium

    Figure 4.  Reconstruction of the trajectory "3". (a) exact moving trajectory, (b) reconstruction by the direct sampling method, (c) plots of Indicator function $ I(\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}},t) $ in the instant $ t = 4.5 $ s (slices at $ x = 1 $ and $ y = 1.2 $), (d) plots of Indicator function $ I(\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}},t) $ in the instant $ t = 7.5 $ s (slices at $ x = 1 $ and $ y = 1.2 $), (e) reconstruction by the particle filter method with $ N_s = 100 $, (f) point-wise error between the exact and reconstructed trajectory

    Figure 5.  Reconstruction of a conical spiral shaped trajectory. (a) exact moving trajectory, (b) reconstruction result by the direct sampling method, (c) reconstruction by the particle filter method with $ N_s = 200 $, (d) point-wise error between the exact and reconstructed trajectory, (e) relationship between the number of particles and relative $ L^2 $ error

    Figure 6.  Reconstruct the trajectory of a text. (a) exact moving trajectory, (b) reconstruction by the direct sampling method, (c) reconstruction by the particle filter method with $ N_s = 500 $, (d) point-wise error between the exact and reconstructed trajectory

    Figure 7.  Reconstruct the moving trajectory by the particle filter method and snapshots at different instants, where the black points denotes the particles. (a) $ t = 3.0 $ s, (b) $ t = 6.6 $ s, (c) $ t = 9.0 $ s, (d) $ t = 9.1 $ s, (e) $ t = 9.2 $ s, (f) $ t = 12.0 $ s

    Table 1.  The relative $ L^2 $ error and the CPU time for reconstructing the trajectory "3" ($ N_h $ and $ N_s $ denote, respectively, the number of sampling points and the number of particle samples)

    Direct sampling method Particle filter technique
    $ N_h=25^3 $ $ N_h=50^3 $ $ N_h=100^3 $ $ N_s=50 $ $ N_s=100 $ $ N_s=500 $
    Error 2.09% 0.79% 0.68% 6.76% 2.62% 1.59%
    Time 16 s 115 s 897 s 0.23 s 0.48 s 10.5 s
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
  • [1] R. Albanese and P. Monk, The inverse source problem for Maxwell's equations, Inverse Problems, 22 (2006), 1023-1035.  doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/22/3/018.
    [2] H. AmmariG. Bao and J. Fleming, An inverse source problem for Maxwell's equations in magnetoencephalography, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 62 (2002), 1369-1382.  doi: 10.1137/S0036139900373927.
    [3] H. AmmariT. BoulierJ. GarnierH. Kang and H. Wang, Tracking of a mobile target using generalized polarization tensor, SIAM J. Imaging Sci., 6 (2013), 1477-1498.  doi: 10.1137/120891022.
    [4] H. AmmariM. P. Tran and H. Wang, Shape identification and classification in echolocation, SIAM J. Imaging Sci., 7 (2014), 1883-1905.  doi: 10.1137/14096164X.
    [5] C. Andrieu, A. Doucet and E. Punskaya, Sequential Monte Carlo Methods in Practice, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2013.
    [6] M. Cheney and B. Borden, Imaging moving targets from scattered waves, Inverse Problems, 24 (2008), 035005, 22pp. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/24/3/035005.
    [7] D. Colton and R. Kress, Inverse Acoustic and Electromagnetic Scattering Theory, 3$^{rd}$ Edition, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2013. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4942-3.
    [8] D. Crisan and A. Doucet, A survey of convergence results on particle filtering methods for practitioners, IEEE Trans. Signal Process, 50 (2002), 736-746.  doi: 10.1109/78.984773.
    [9] Y. Deng, H. Liu and G. Uhlmann, On an inverse boundary problem arising in brain imaging, Journal of Differential Equations, 2019, arXiv: 1702.00154 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2019.03.019.
    [10] S. Escalera, V. Athitsos and I. Guyon, Challenges in multi-modal gesture recognition, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 17 (2016), Paper No. 72, 54 pp.
    [11] A. FokasY. Kurylev and V. Marinakis, The unique determination of neuronal currents in the brain via magnetoencephalography, Inverse Problems, 20 (2004), 1067-1082.  doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/20/4/005.
    [12] J. Garnier and M. Fink, Super-resolution in time-reversal focusing on a moving source, Wave Motion, 53 (2015), 80-93.  doi: 10.1016/j.wavemoti.2014.11.005.
    [13] D. Griffiths, Introduction to Electrodynamics, 3$^{rd}$ Edition, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1999.
    [14] S. He and V. Romanov, Identification of dipole sources in a bounded domain for Maxwell's equations, Wave Motion, 28 (1998), 25-40.  doi: 10.1016/S0165-2125(97)00063-2.
    [15] V. Isakov, Inverse Source Problems, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 34. American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1990. doi: 10.1090/surv/034.
    [16] J. Kaipio and E. Somersalo, Statistical and Computatioanal Inverse Problems, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2005.
    [17] M. V. Klibanov and V. G. Romanov, Two reconstruction procedures for a 3D phaseless inverse scattering problem for the generalized Helmholtz equation, Inverse Problems, 32 (2016), 015005, 16pp. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/32/1/015005.
    [18] R. Leis, Initial Boundary Value Problems in Mathematical Physics, Springer Fachmedien, Wiesbaden, 1986. doi: 10.1007/978-3-663-10649-4.
    [19] J. LiH. LiuZ. Shang and H. Sun, Two single-shot methods for locating multiple electromagnetic scatterers, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 73 (2013), 1721-1746.  doi: 10.1137/130907690.
    [20] Y. LiuD. Jiang and M. Yamamoto, Inverse source problem for a double hyperbolic equation describing the three-dimensional time cone model, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 75 (2015), 2610-2635.  doi: 10.1137/15M1018836.
    [21] H. LiuY. Wang and C. Yang, Mathematical design of a novel gesture-based instruction/input device using wave detection, SIAM J. Imaging Sci., 9 (2016), 822-841.  doi: 10.1137/16M1063551.
    [22] S. Mitra and T. Acharya, Gesture Recognition: A Survey, IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part C, 37 (2007), 311-324.  doi: 10.1109/TSMCC.2007.893280.
    [23] E. Nakaguchi, H. Inui and K. Ohnaka, An algebraic reconstruction of a moving point source for a scalar wave equation, Inverse Problems, 28 (2012), 065018, 21pp. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/28/6/065018.
    [24] G. Nakamura and R. Potthast, Inverse Modeling, IOP Publishing, Bristol, 2015.
    [25] J. Nédélec, Acoustic and Electromagnetic Equations: Integral Representations for Harmonic Problems, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2001. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-4393-7.
    [26] X. Wang, Y. Guo, J. Li and H. Liu, Mathematical design of a novel input/instruction device using a moving emitter, Inverse Problems, 33 (2017), 105009, 19pp. doi: 10.1088/1361-6420/aa873f.
    [27] Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gesture_recognition.
    [28] S. Yang, P. K. Premaratne and P. J. Vial, Hand gesture recognition: An overview, in 5th IEEE International Conference on Broadband Network and Multimedia Technology, Academic Press, (2013), 63–69. doi: 10.1109/ICBNMT.2013.6823916.
  • 加载中




Article Metrics

HTML views(1105) PDF downloads(305) Cited by(0)

Access History

Other Articles By Authors



    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint