# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

• Previous Article
Preconditioned Douglas-Rachford type primal-dual method for solving composite monotone inclusion problems with applications
• IPI Home
• This Issue
• Next Article
Cauchy problem of non-homogenous stochastic heat equation and application to inverse random source problem
doi: 10.3934/ipi.2021012

## A sampling type method in an electromagnetic waveguide

 Institute of Applied Mathematics, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China

Received  July 2020 Revised  November 2020 Published  January 2021

We propose a sampling type method to image scatterer in an electromagnetic waveguide. The waveguide terminates at one end and the measurements are on the other end and in the far field. The imaging function is based on integrating the measurements and a known function over the measurement surface directly. The design and analysis of such imaging function are based on a factorization of a data operator given by the measurements. We show by analysis that the imaging function peaks inside the scatterer, where the coercivity of the factorized operator and the design of the known function play a central role. Finally, numerical examples are provided to demonstrate the performance of the imaging method.

Citation: Shixu Meng. A sampling type method in an electromagnetic waveguide. Inverse Problems & Imaging, doi: 10.3934/ipi.2021012
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
Plot of $|\mathcal{H} \Psi ({\boldsymbol{x}}_*;{\boldsymbol{z}}) {\boldsymbol{e}}_j|^2$ as a function of the sampling point ${\boldsymbol{z}}$ for a rectangular waveguide with cross section $(0,10)\times(0,10)$ where ${\boldsymbol{x}}_* = (5,5,-5)$ and $k = 3$. Top left: Iso-surface plot with iso-value $0.6$. Top right: $x_1x_2$-cross section image. Bottom left: $x_2x_3$-cross section image. Bottom right: $x_1x_3$-cross section image
Three dimensional view of the generated mesh
Image of a cuboid. Top left: exact. Top middle: three dimensional image using iso-surface plot with iso-value $0.6$. Top right: three dimensional image using iso-surface plot with iso-value $0.4$. At the bottom, we plot the cross section images where the exact geometry is indicated by the dashed line. Bottom left: $x_1x_2$-cross section image. Bottom middle: $x_2x_3$-cross section image. Bottom right: $x_1x_3$-cross section image
Image of a L-shape scatterer. Top left: exact. Top middle: three dimensional image using iso-surface plot with iso-value $0.5$. Top right: three dimensional image using iso-surface plot with iso-value $0.4$. At the bottom, we plot the cross section images where the exact geometry is indicated by the dashed line. Bottom left: $x_1x_2$-cross section image. Bottom middle: $x_2x_3$-cross section image. Bottom right: $x_1x_3$-cross section image
Image of a cylindrical scatterer. Top left: exact. Top middle: $k = 3$; three dimensional image using iso-surface plot with iso-value $0.4$. Top right: $k = 5$; three dimensional image using iso-surface plot with iso-value $0.3$. In the middle ($k = 3$) and bottom ($k = 5$) row, we plot the cross section images where the exact geometry is indicated by the dashed line. Middle/bottom row left: $x_1x_2$-cross section image. Middle/bottom row middle: $x_2x_3$-cross section image. Middle/bottom row right: $x_1x_3$-cross section image
Top: image of two balls. Bottom: image of three balls. Left: exact. Middle: three dimensional image using iso-surface plot (with iso-value 0.2). Right: $x_1x_2$-cross section image
Image of a large ball. Left: exact. Middle: three dimensional image when $k = 1$. Right: three dimensional image when $k = 3$
Iso-surface (with the same iso-value 0.4) image of the L-shape scatterer. Left: exact. Middle: $10\%$ noise. Right: $30\%$ noise
 [1] Marion Darbas, Jérémy Heleine, Stephanie Lohrengel. Numerical resolution by the quasi-reversibility method of a data completion problem for Maxwell's equations. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2020, 14 (6) : 1107-1133. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020056 [2] Armin Lechleiter, Tobias Rienmüller. Factorization method for the inverse Stokes problem. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2013, 7 (4) : 1271-1293. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2013.7.1271 [3] Deren Han, Zehui Jia, Yongzhong Song, David Z. W. Wang. An efficient projection method for nonlinear inverse problems with sparsity constraints. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2016, 10 (3) : 689-709. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2016017 [4] Bernold Fiedler, Carlos Rocha, Matthias Wolfrum. Sturm global attractors for $S^1$-equivariant parabolic equations. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2012, 7 (4) : 617-659. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2012.7.617 [5] Qiang Guo, Dong Liang. An adaptive wavelet method and its analysis for parabolic equations. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2013, 3 (2) : 327-345. doi: 10.3934/naco.2013.3.327 [6] Boris Kramer, John R. Singler. A POD projection method for large-scale algebraic Riccati equations. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2016, 6 (4) : 413-435. doi: 10.3934/naco.2016018 [7] Alexandr Mikhaylov, Victor Mikhaylov. Dynamic inverse problem for Jacobi matrices. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2019, 13 (3) : 431-447. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2019021 [8] Mikhail Gilman, Semyon Tsynkov. Statistical characterization of scattering delay in synthetic aperture radar imaging. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2020, 14 (3) : 511-533. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020024 [9] Yanqin Fang, Jihui Zhang. Multiplicity of solutions for the nonlinear Schrödinger-Maxwell system. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2011, 10 (4) : 1267-1279. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2011.10.1267 [10] Z. Reichstein and B. Youssin. Parusinski's "Key Lemma" via algebraic geometry. Electronic Research Announcements, 1999, 5: 136-145. [11] Ronald E. Mickens. Positivity preserving discrete model for the coupled ODE's modeling glycolysis. Conference Publications, 2003, 2003 (Special) : 623-629. doi: 10.3934/proc.2003.2003.623 [12] Hakan Özadam, Ferruh Özbudak. A note on negacyclic and cyclic codes of length $p^s$ over a finite field of characteristic $p$. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2009, 3 (3) : 265-271. doi: 10.3934/amc.2009.3.265 [13] Sergi Simon. Linearised higher variational equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2014, 34 (11) : 4827-4854. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.4827 [14] Tao Wu, Yu Lei, Jiao Shi, Maoguo Gong. An evolutionary multiobjective method for low-rank and sparse matrix decomposition. Big Data & Information Analytics, 2017, 2 (1) : 23-37. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2017006 [15] Petra Csomós, Hermann Mena. Fourier-splitting method for solving hyperbolic LQR problems. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2018, 8 (1) : 17-46. doi: 10.3934/naco.2018002 [16] Christina Surulescu, Nicolae Surulescu. Modeling and simulation of some cell dispersion problems by a nonparametric method. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2011, 8 (2) : 263-277. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.263 [17] Min Li. A three term Polak-Ribière-Polyak conjugate gradient method close to the memoryless BFGS quasi-Newton method. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020, 16 (1) : 245-260. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018149 [18] Jaume Llibre, Luci Any Roberto. On the periodic solutions of a class of Duffing differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2013, 33 (1) : 277-282. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.277 [19] María J. Garrido-Atienza, Bohdan Maslowski, Jana  Šnupárková. Semilinear stochastic equations with bilinear fractional noise. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (9) : 3075-3094. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016088 [20] Matthias Erbar, Jan Maas. Gradient flow structures for discrete porous medium equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2014, 34 (4) : 1355-1374. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.1355

2019 Impact Factor: 1.373

## Tools

Article outline

Figures and Tables