American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
  • Previous Article
    Asymptotic invariance and the discretisation of nonautonomous forward attracting sets
  • JCD Home
  • This Issue
  • Next Article
    Towards tensor-based methods for the numerical approximation of the Perron--Frobenius and Koopman operator
June  2016, 3(2): 163-177. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2016008

Computing coherent sets using the Fokker-Planck equation

Andreas Denner 1, , Oliver Junge 1, and  Daniel Matthes 1,

1. 

Center for Mathematics, Technische Universität München, 85747 Garching bei München, Germany, Germany

Received  December 2015 Revised  October 2016 Published  December 2016

We perform a numerical approximation of coherent sets in finite-dimensional smooth dynamical systems by computing singular vectors of the transfer operator for a stochastically perturbed flow. This operator is obtained by solution of a discretized Fokker-Planck equation. For numerical implementation, we employ spectral collocation methods and an exponential time differentiation scheme. We experimentally compare our approach with the more classical method by Ulam that is based on discretization of the transfer operator of the unperturbed flow.
Keywords: transfer operator, Coherent set, Fokker-Planck equation..
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 37M25; Secondary: 37N1.
Citation: Andreas Denner, Oliver Junge, Daniel Matthes. Computing coherent sets using the Fokker-Planck equation. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2016, 3 (2) : 163-177. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2016008
References:
[1]

R. Banisch and P. Koltai, Understanding the geometry of transport: diffusion maps for Lagrangian trajectory data unravel coherent sets,, , ().   Google Scholar

[2]

J. P. Boyd, Chebyshev and Fourier Spectral Methods, Second edition. Dover Publications, Inc., Mineola, NY, 2001.  Google Scholar

[3]

S. Cox and P. Matthews, Exponential time differencing for stiff systems, Journal of Computational Physics, 176 (2002), 430-455. doi: 10.1006/jcph.2002.6995.  Google Scholar

[4]

M. Dellnitz, G. Froyland and O. Junge, The algorithms behind GAIO - Set oriented numerical methods for dynamical systems, in Ergodic Theory, Analysis, and Efficient Simulation of Dynamical Systems (ed. B. Fiedler), Springer, 2001, 145-174, 805-807.  Google Scholar

[5]

M. Dellnitz and O. Junge, On the approximation of complicated dynamical behavior, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 36 (1999), 491-515. doi: 10.1137/S0036142996313002.  Google Scholar

[6]

L. Evans, Partial Differential Equations, Graduate studies in mathematics, American Mathematical Society, 2010. doi: 10.1090/gsm/019.  Google Scholar

[7]

G. Froyland, S. Lloyd and N. Santitissadeekorn, Coherent sets for nonautonomous dynamical systems, Physica D, 239 (2010), 1527-1541. doi: 10.1016/j.physd.2010.03.009.  Google Scholar

[8]

G. Froyland and K. Padberg, Almost-invariant sets and invariant manifolds - connecting probabilistic and geometric descriptions of coherent structures in flows, Physica D, 238 (2009), 1507-1523. doi: 10.1016/j.physd.2009.03.002.  Google Scholar

[9]

G. Froyland, N. Santitissadeekorn and A. Monahan, Transport in time-dependent dynamical systems: Finite-time coherent sets, Chaos, 20 (2010), 043116, 10pp. doi: 10.1063/1.3502450.  Google Scholar

[10]

G. Froyland, An analytic framework for identifying finite-time coherent sets in time-dependent dynamical systems, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 250 (2013), 1-19. doi: 10.1016/j.physd.2013.01.013.  Google Scholar

[11]

G. Froyland and M. Dellnitz, Detecting and locating near-optimal almost-invariant sets and cycles, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 24 (2003), 1839-1863. doi: 10.1137/S106482750238911X.  Google Scholar

[12]

G. Froyland and O. Junge, On fast computation of finite-time coherent sets using radial basis functions, Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 25 (2015), 087409, 11pp. doi: 10.1063/1.4927640.  Google Scholar

[13]

G. Froyland, O. Junge and P. Koltai, Estimating long term behavior of flows without trajectory integration: The infinitesimal generator approach, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 51 (2013), 223-247. doi: 10.1137/110819986.  Google Scholar

[14]

G. Froyland and P. Koltai, Estimating long-term behavior of periodically driven flows without trajectory integration,, , ().   Google Scholar

[15]

G. Froyland and K. Padberg-Gehle, Almost-invariant and finite-time coherent sets: Directionality, duration, and diffusion, in Ergodic Theory, Open Dynamics, and Coherent Structures, Springer, 70 (2014), 171-216. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0419-8_9.  Google Scholar

[16]

A. Hadjighasem, D. Karrasch, H. Teramoto and G. Haller, Spectral-clustering approach to lagrangian vortex detection, Phys. Rev. E, 93 (2016), 063107. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.93.063107.  Google Scholar

[17]

G. Haller, Distinguished material surfaces and coherent structures in three-dimensional fluid flows, Physica D, 149 (2001), 248-277. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2789(00)00199-8.  Google Scholar

[18]

G. Haller, A variational theory of hyperbolic Lagrangian coherent structures, Physica D, 240 (2011), 574-598. doi: 10.1016/j.physd.2010.11.010.  Google Scholar

[19]

G. Haller and G. Yuan, Lagrangian coherent structures and mixing in two-dimensional turbulence, Physica D, 147 (2000), 352-370. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2789(00)00142-1.  Google Scholar

[20]

W. Huisinga and B. Schmidt, Metastability and dominant eigenvalues of transfer operators, in New Algorithms for Macromolecular Simulation, Springer, 49 (2006), 167-182. doi: 10.1007/3-540-31618-3_11.  Google Scholar

[21]

O. Junge, J. E. Marsden and I. Mezic, Uncertainty in the dynamics of conservative maps, in Proceedings of the 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2 (2004), 2225-2230. doi: 10.1109/CDC.2004.1430379.  Google Scholar

[22]

A.-K. Kassam and L. N. Trefethen, Fourth-order time-stepping for stiff pdes, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 26 (2005), 1214-1233. doi: 10.1137/S1064827502410633.  Google Scholar

[23]

A. Lasota and M. Mackey, Chaos, Fractals, and Noise: Stochastic Aspects of Dynamics, Second edition. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 97. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-4286-4.  Google Scholar

[24]

T. Y. Li, Finite Approximation for the Frobenius-Perron Operator. A Solution to Ulam's Conjecture, J. Approx. Theory, 17 (1976), 177-186. doi: 10.1016/0021-9045(76)90037-X.  Google Scholar

[25]

J.-C. Nave, Computational Science and Engineering, 2008, (Massachusetts Institute of Technology: MIT OpenCouseWare), http://ocw.mit.edu (Accessed July 13, 2015). License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA. Google Scholar

[26]

B. Oksendal, Stochastic Differential Equations: An Introduction with Applications,, Springer, ().   Google Scholar

[27]

C. Schütte, A. Fischer, W. Huisinga and P. Deuflhard, A direct approach to conformational dynamics based on hybrid monte carlo, Journal of Computational Physics, 151 (1999), 146-168. doi: 10.1006/jcph.1999.6231.  Google Scholar

[28]

S. M. Ulam, Problems in Modern Mathematics, Courier Dover Publications, 2004. Google Scholar

[29]

T. A. Zang, On the rotation and skew-symmetric forms for incompressible flow simulations, Applied Numerical Mathematics, 7 (1991), 27-40. doi: 10.1016/0168-9274(91)90102-6.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

R. Banisch and P. Koltai, Understanding the geometry of transport: diffusion maps for Lagrangian trajectory data unravel coherent sets,, , ().   Google Scholar

[2]

J. P. Boyd, Chebyshev and Fourier Spectral Methods, Second edition. Dover Publications, Inc., Mineola, NY, 2001.  Google Scholar

[3]

S. Cox and P. Matthews, Exponential time differencing for stiff systems, Journal of Computational Physics, 176 (2002), 430-455. doi: 10.1006/jcph.2002.6995.  Google Scholar

[4]

M. Dellnitz, G. Froyland and O. Junge, The algorithms behind GAIO - Set oriented numerical methods for dynamical systems, in Ergodic Theory, Analysis, and Efficient Simulation of Dynamical Systems (ed. B. Fiedler), Springer, 2001, 145-174, 805-807.  Google Scholar

[5]

M. Dellnitz and O. Junge, On the approximation of complicated dynamical behavior, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 36 (1999), 491-515. doi: 10.1137/S0036142996313002.  Google Scholar

[6]

L. Evans, Partial Differential Equations, Graduate studies in mathematics, American Mathematical Society, 2010. doi: 10.1090/gsm/019.  Google Scholar

[7]

G. Froyland, S. Lloyd and N. Santitissadeekorn, Coherent sets for nonautonomous dynamical systems, Physica D, 239 (2010), 1527-1541. doi: 10.1016/j.physd.2010.03.009.  Google Scholar

[8]

G. Froyland and K. Padberg, Almost-invariant sets and invariant manifolds - connecting probabilistic and geometric descriptions of coherent structures in flows, Physica D, 238 (2009), 1507-1523. doi: 10.1016/j.physd.2009.03.002.  Google Scholar

[9]

G. Froyland, N. Santitissadeekorn and A. Monahan, Transport in time-dependent dynamical systems: Finite-time coherent sets, Chaos, 20 (2010), 043116, 10pp. doi: 10.1063/1.3502450.  Google Scholar

[10]

G. Froyland, An analytic framework for identifying finite-time coherent sets in time-dependent dynamical systems, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 250 (2013), 1-19. doi: 10.1016/j.physd.2013.01.013.  Google Scholar

[11]

G. Froyland and M. Dellnitz, Detecting and locating near-optimal almost-invariant sets and cycles, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 24 (2003), 1839-1863. doi: 10.1137/S106482750238911X.  Google Scholar

[12]

G. Froyland and O. Junge, On fast computation of finite-time coherent sets using radial basis functions, Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 25 (2015), 087409, 11pp. doi: 10.1063/1.4927640.  Google Scholar

[13]

G. Froyland, O. Junge and P. Koltai, Estimating long term behavior of flows without trajectory integration: The infinitesimal generator approach, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 51 (2013), 223-247. doi: 10.1137/110819986.  Google Scholar

[14]

G. Froyland and P. Koltai, Estimating long-term behavior of periodically driven flows without trajectory integration,, , ().   Google Scholar

[15]

G. Froyland and K. Padberg-Gehle, Almost-invariant and finite-time coherent sets: Directionality, duration, and diffusion, in Ergodic Theory, Open Dynamics, and Coherent Structures, Springer, 70 (2014), 171-216. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0419-8_9.  Google Scholar

[16]

A. Hadjighasem, D. Karrasch, H. Teramoto and G. Haller, Spectral-clustering approach to lagrangian vortex detection, Phys. Rev. E, 93 (2016), 063107. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.93.063107.  Google Scholar

[17]

G. Haller, Distinguished material surfaces and coherent structures in three-dimensional fluid flows, Physica D, 149 (2001), 248-277. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2789(00)00199-8.  Google Scholar

[18]

G. Haller, A variational theory of hyperbolic Lagrangian coherent structures, Physica D, 240 (2011), 574-598. doi: 10.1016/j.physd.2010.11.010.  Google Scholar

[19]

G. Haller and G. Yuan, Lagrangian coherent structures and mixing in two-dimensional turbulence, Physica D, 147 (2000), 352-370. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2789(00)00142-1.  Google Scholar

[20]

W. Huisinga and B. Schmidt, Metastability and dominant eigenvalues of transfer operators, in New Algorithms for Macromolecular Simulation, Springer, 49 (2006), 167-182. doi: 10.1007/3-540-31618-3_11.  Google Scholar

[21]

O. Junge, J. E. Marsden and I. Mezic, Uncertainty in the dynamics of conservative maps, in Proceedings of the 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2 (2004), 2225-2230. doi: 10.1109/CDC.2004.1430379.  Google Scholar

[22]

A.-K. Kassam and L. N. Trefethen, Fourth-order time-stepping for stiff pdes, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 26 (2005), 1214-1233. doi: 10.1137/S1064827502410633.  Google Scholar

[23]

A. Lasota and M. Mackey, Chaos, Fractals, and Noise: Stochastic Aspects of Dynamics, Second edition. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 97. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-4286-4.  Google Scholar

[24]

T. Y. Li, Finite Approximation for the Frobenius-Perron Operator. A Solution to Ulam's Conjecture, J. Approx. Theory, 17 (1976), 177-186. doi: 10.1016/0021-9045(76)90037-X.  Google Scholar

[25]

J.-C. Nave, Computational Science and Engineering, 2008, (Massachusetts Institute of Technology: MIT OpenCouseWare), http://ocw.mit.edu (Accessed July 13, 2015). License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA. Google Scholar

[26]

B. Oksendal, Stochastic Differential Equations: An Introduction with Applications,, Springer, ().   Google Scholar

[27]

C. Schütte, A. Fischer, W. Huisinga and P. Deuflhard, A direct approach to conformational dynamics based on hybrid monte carlo, Journal of Computational Physics, 151 (1999), 146-168. doi: 10.1006/jcph.1999.6231.  Google Scholar

[28]

S. M. Ulam, Problems in Modern Mathematics, Courier Dover Publications, 2004. Google Scholar

[29]

T. A. Zang, On the rotation and skew-symmetric forms for incompressible flow simulations, Applied Numerical Mathematics, 7 (1991), 27-40. doi: 10.1016/0168-9274(91)90102-6.  Google Scholar

[1]

Manh Hong Duong, Yulong Lu. An operator splitting scheme for the fractional kinetic Fokker-Planck equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2019, 39 (10) : 5707-5727. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019250
[2]

Sylvain De Moor, Luis Miguel Rodrigues, Julien Vovelle. Invariant measures for a stochastic Fokker-Planck equation. Kinetic & Related Models, 2018, 11 (2) : 357-395. doi: 10.3934/krm.2018017
[3]

Marco Torregrossa, Giuseppe Toscani. On a Fokker-Planck equation for wealth distribution. Kinetic & Related Models, 2018, 11 (2) : 337-355. doi: 10.3934/krm.2018016
[4]

Michael Herty, Christian Jörres, Albert N. Sandjo. Optimization of a model Fokker-Planck equation. Kinetic & Related Models, 2012, 5 (3) : 485-503. doi: 10.3934/krm.2012.5.485
[5]

José Antonio Alcántara, Simone Calogero. On a relativistic Fokker-Planck equation in kinetic theory. Kinetic & Related Models, 2011, 4 (2) : 401-426. doi: 10.3934/krm.2011.4.401
[6]

Helge Dietert, Josephine Evans, Thomas Holding. Contraction in the Wasserstein metric for the kinetic Fokker-Planck equation on the torus. Kinetic & Related Models, 2018, 11 (6) : 1427-1441. doi: 10.3934/krm.2018056
[7]

Ioannis Markou. Hydrodynamic limit for a Fokker-Planck equation with coefficients in Sobolev spaces. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2017, 12 (4) : 683-705. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2017028
[8]

Giuseppe Toscani. A Rosenau-type approach to the approximation of the linear Fokker-Planck equation. Kinetic & Related Models, 2018, 11 (4) : 697-714. doi: 10.3934/krm.2018028
[9]

Shui-Nee Chow, Wuchen Li, Haomin Zhou. Entropy dissipation of Fokker-Planck equations on graphs. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2018, 38 (10) : 4929-4950. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018215
[10]

Martin Burger, Ina Humpert, Jan-Frederik Pietschmann. On Fokker-Planck equations with In- and Outflow of Mass. Kinetic & Related Models, 2020, 13 (2) : 249-277. doi: 10.3934/krm.2020009
[11]

Michael Herty, Lorenzo Pareschi. Fokker-Planck asymptotics for traffic flow models. Kinetic & Related Models, 2010, 3 (1) : 165-179. doi: 10.3934/krm.2010.3.165
[12]

Fabio Camilli, Serikbolsyn Duisembay, Qing Tang. Approximation of an optimal control problem for the time-fractional Fokker-Planck equation. Journal of Dynamics & Games, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jdg.2021013
[13]

Ludovic Dan Lemle. $L^1(R^d,dx)$-uniqueness of weak solutions for the Fokker-Planck equation associated with a class of Dirichlet operators. Electronic Research Announcements, 2008, 15: 65-70. doi: 10.3934/era.2008.15.65
[14]

Joseph G. Conlon, André Schlichting. A non-local problem for the Fokker-Planck equation related to the Becker-Döring model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2019, 39 (4) : 1821-1889. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019079
[15]

Simon Plazotta. A BDF2-approach for the non-linear Fokker-Planck equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2019, 39 (5) : 2893-2913. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019120
[16]

Patrick Cattiaux, Elissar Nasreddine, Marjolaine Puel. Diffusion limit for kinetic Fokker-Planck equation with heavy tails equilibria: The critical case. Kinetic & Related Models, 2019, 12 (4) : 727-748. doi: 10.3934/krm.2019028
[17]

Florian Schneider, Andreas Roth, Jochen Kall. First-order quarter-and mixed-moment realizability theory and Kershaw closures for a Fokker-Planck equation in two space dimensions. Kinetic & Related Models, 2017, 10 (4) : 1127-1161. doi: 10.3934/krm.2017044
[18]

Zeinab Karaki. Trend to the equilibrium for the Fokker-Planck system with an external magnetic field. Kinetic & Related Models, 2020, 13 (2) : 309-344. doi: 10.3934/krm.2020011
[19]

Roberta Bosi. Classical limit for linear and nonlinear quantum Fokker-Planck systems. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2009, 8 (3) : 845-870. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2009.8.845
[20]

Yuan Gao, Guangzhen Jin, Jian-Guo Liu. Inbetweening auto-animation via Fokker-Planck dynamics and thresholding. Inverse Problems & Imaging, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2021016

 Impact Factor: 

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (159)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (7)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2021 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences