An incremental approach to online dynamic mode decomposition for time-varying systems with applications to EEG data modeling

Previous Article
Continuous approximation of $ M_t/M_t/ 1 $ distributions with application to production
JCD Home
This Issue
Next Article
Solving the inverse problem for an ordinary differential equation using conjugation

December 2020, 7(2): 209-241. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2020009

An incremental approach to online dynamic mode decomposition for time-varying systems with applications to EEG data modeling

Mustaffa Alfatlawi and Vaibhav Srivastava

Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA

Received September 2019 Published July 2020

Fund Project: This work has been supported by NSF Award IIS-1734272

Dynamic Mode Decomposition (DMD) is a data-driven technique to identify a low dimensional linear time invariant dynamics underlying high-dimensional data. For systems in which such underlying low-dimensional dynamics is time-varying, a time-invariant approximation of such dynamics computed through standard DMD techniques may not be appropriate. We focus on DMD techniques for such time-varying systems and develop incremental algorithms for systems without and with exogenous control inputs. We build upon the work in [35] to scenarios in which high dimensional data are governed by low dimensional time-varying dynamics. We consider two classes of algorithms that rely on (ⅰ) a discount factor on previous observations, and (ⅱ) a sliding window of observations. Our algorithms leverage existing techniques for incremental singular value decomposition and allow us to determine an appropriately reduced model at each time and are applicable even if data matrix is singular. We apply the developed algorithms for autonomous systems to Electroencephalographic (EEG) data and demonstrate their effectiveness in terms of reconstruction and prediction. Our algorithms for non-autonomous systems are illustrated using randomly generated linear time-varying systems.

Keywords: Data-driven dynamics, dynamic mode decomposition, time-varying systems, incremental algorithms.

Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 37M99, 37M10, 37N35; Secondary: 37N25.

Citation: Mustaffa Alfatlawi, Vaibhav Srivastava. An incremental approach to online dynamic mode decomposition for time-varying systems with applications to EEG data modeling. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2020, 7 (2) : 209-241. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2020009

References:

[1]	M. Brand, Incremental singular value decomposition of uncertain data with missing values, in European Conference on Computer Vision, Springer, 2002,707–720. Google Scholar
[2]	M. Brand, Fast low-rank modifications of the thin singular value decomposition, Linear Algebra Appl., 415 (2006), 20-30. doi: 10.1016/j.laa.2005.07.021. Google Scholar
[3]	B. W. Brunton, L. A. Johnson, J. G. Ojemann and J. N. Kutz, Extracting spatial–temporal coherent patterns in large-scale neural recordings using dynamic mode decomposition, Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 258 (2016), 1-15. Google Scholar
[4]	R. Chavarriaga and J. D. R. Millán, Learning from EEG error-related potentials in noninvasive brain-computer interfaces, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 18 (2010), 381-388. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2010.2053387. Google Scholar
[5]	R. Chavarriaga, A. Sobolewski and J. D. R. Millán, Errare machinale est: The use of error-related potentials in brain-machine interfaces, Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8 (2014), 208. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00208. Google Scholar
[6]	X. Chen and K. S. Candan, LWI-SVD: Low-rank, windowed, incremental singular value decompositions on time-evolving data sets, in Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, ACM, 2014,987–996. doi: 10.1145/2623330.2623671. Google Scholar
[7]	A. C. Costa, T. Ahamed and G. J. Stephens, Adaptive, locally linear models of complex dynamics, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116 (2019), 1501-1510. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1813476116. Google Scholar
[8]	A. Delorme and S. Makeig, EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial eeg dynamics including independent component analysis, Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134 (2004), 9-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009. Google Scholar
[9]	P. W. Ferrez and J. d. R. Millán, Error-related EEG potentials generated during simulated brain–computer interaction, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 55 (2008), 923-929. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2007.908083. Google Scholar
[10]	J. Grosek and J. N. Kutz, Dynamic mode decomposition for real-time background/foreground separation in video, arXiv preprint, arXiv: 1404.7592. Google Scholar
[11]	M. Gu and S. C. Eisenstat, A Stable and Fast Algorithm for Updating the Singular Value Decomposition, Technical Report YALEU/DCS/RR-966, Department of Computer Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 1993. Google Scholar
[12]	M. Hemati, E. Deem, M. Williams, C. W. Rowley and L. N. Cattafesta, Improving separation control with noise-robust variants of dynamic mode decomposition, in 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, (2016), 1103. doi: 10.2514/6.2016-1103. Google Scholar
[13]	M. S. Hemati, M. O. Williams and C. W. Rowley, Dynamic mode decomposition for large and streaming datasets, Physics of Fluids, 26 (2014), 111701. doi: 10.1063/1.4901016. Google Scholar
[14]	T. K. Huckle, Efficient computation of sparse approximate inverses, Numer. Linear Algebra Appl., 5 (1998), 57-71. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1506(199801/02)5:1<57::AID-NLA129>3.0.CO;2-C. Google Scholar
[15]	R. Isermann and M. Münchhof, Identification of Dynamic Systems: An Introduction with Applications, Springer, Heidelberg, 2011. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-78879-9. Google Scholar
[16]	S. M. Kay, Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing, Prentice Hall PTR, 1993. Google Scholar
[17]	B. O. Koopman, Hamiltonian systems and transformation in Hilbert space, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 17 (1931), 315-318. doi: 10.1073/pnas.17.5.315. Google Scholar
[18]	M. Korda and I. Mezić, Linear predictors for nonlinear dynamical systems: Koopman operator meets model predictive control, Automatica J. IFAC, 93 (2018), 149-160. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2018.03.046. Google Scholar
[19]	J. N. Kutz, S. L. Brunton, B. W. Brunton and J. L. Proctor, Dynamic Mode Decomposition: Data-Driven Modeling of Complex Systems, vol. 149, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA, 2016. doi: 10.1137/1.9781611974508. Google Scholar
[20]	S. Maćešić, N. Črnjarić-Žic and I. Mezić, Koopman operator family spectrum for nonautonomous systems-part 1, arXiv preprint, arXiv: 1703.07324. Google Scholar
[21]	D. Matsumoto and T. Indinger, On-the-fly algorithm for dynamic mode decomposition using incremental singular value decomposition and total least squares, arXiv preprint, arXiv: 1703.11004. Google Scholar
[22]	C. Meyer, Matrix Analysis and Applied Linear Algebra, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 2000. doi: 10.1137/1.9780898719512. Google Scholar
[23]	I. Mezić, Spectral properties of dynamical systems, model reduction and decompositions, Nonlinear Dynam., 41 (2005), 309-325. doi: 10.1007/s11071-005-2824-x. Google Scholar
[24]	I. Mezić, Analysis of fluid fows via spectral properties of the Koopman operator, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 45 (2013), 357-378. doi: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-011212-140652. Google Scholar
[25]	I. Mezić and A. Banaszuk, Comparison of systems with complex behavior, Phys. D, 197 (2004), 101-133. doi: 10.1016/j.physd.2004.06.015. Google Scholar
[26]	G. M. Oxberry, T. Kostova-Vassilevska, W. Arrighi and K. Chand, Limited-memory adaptive snapshot selection for proper orthogonal decomposition, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 109 (2017), 198-217. doi: 10.1002/nme.5283. Google Scholar
[27]	J. L. Proctor, S. L. Brunton and J. N. Kutz, Dynamic mode decomposition with control, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst., 15 (2016), 142-161. doi: 10.1137/15M1013857. Google Scholar
[28]	J. L. Proctor and P. A. Eckhoff, Discovering dynamic patterns from infectious disease data using dynamic mode decomposition, International Health, 7 (2015), 139-145. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihv009. Google Scholar
[29]	C. W. Rowley, I. Mezić, S. Bagheri, P. Schlatter and D. S. Henningson, Spectral analysis of nonlinear flows, J. Fluid Mech., 641 (2009), 115-127. doi: 10.1017/S0022112009992059. Google Scholar
[30]	P. J. Schmid, Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data, J. Fluid Mech., 656 (2010), 5-28. doi: 10.1017/S0022112010001217. Google Scholar
[31]	J. Sherman and W. J. Morrison, Adjustment of an inverse matrix corresponding to a change in one element of a given matrix, Ann. Math. Statistics, 21 (1950), 124-127. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177729893. Google Scholar
[32]	A. Surana, Koopman operator based nonlinear dynamic textures, in 2015 American Control Conference (ACC), IEEE, 2015, 1333–1338. doi: 10.1109/ACC.2015.7170918. Google Scholar
[33]	J. H. Tu, C. W. Rowley, D. M. Luchtenburg, S. L. Brunton and J. N. Kutz, On dynamic mode decomposition: Theory and applications, J. Comput. Dyn., 1 (2014), 391-421. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2014.1.391. Google Scholar
[34]	M. O. Williams, I. G. Kevrekidis and C. W. Rowley, A data–driven approximation of the Koopman operator: Extending dynamic mode decomposition, J. Nonlinear Sci., 25 (2015), 1307-1346. doi: 10.1007/s00332-015-9258-5. Google Scholar
[35]	H. Zhang, C. W. Rowley, E. A. Deem and L. N. Cattafesta, Online dynamic mode decomposition for time-varying systems, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst., 18 (2019), 1586-1609. doi: 10.1137/18M1192329. Google Scholar

show all references

References:

[1]	M. Brand, Incremental singular value decomposition of uncertain data with missing values, in European Conference on Computer Vision, Springer, 2002,707–720. Google Scholar
[2]	M. Brand, Fast low-rank modifications of the thin singular value decomposition, Linear Algebra Appl., 415 (2006), 20-30. doi: 10.1016/j.laa.2005.07.021. Google Scholar
[3]	B. W. Brunton, L. A. Johnson, J. G. Ojemann and J. N. Kutz, Extracting spatial–temporal coherent patterns in large-scale neural recordings using dynamic mode decomposition, Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 258 (2016), 1-15. Google Scholar
[4]	R. Chavarriaga and J. D. R. Millán, Learning from EEG error-related potentials in noninvasive brain-computer interfaces, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 18 (2010), 381-388. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2010.2053387. Google Scholar
[5]	R. Chavarriaga, A. Sobolewski and J. D. R. Millán, Errare machinale est: The use of error-related potentials in brain-machine interfaces, Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8 (2014), 208. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00208. Google Scholar
[6]	X. Chen and K. S. Candan, LWI-SVD: Low-rank, windowed, incremental singular value decompositions on time-evolving data sets, in Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, ACM, 2014,987–996. doi: 10.1145/2623330.2623671. Google Scholar
[7]	A. C. Costa, T. Ahamed and G. J. Stephens, Adaptive, locally linear models of complex dynamics, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116 (2019), 1501-1510. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1813476116. Google Scholar
[8]	A. Delorme and S. Makeig, EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial eeg dynamics including independent component analysis, Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134 (2004), 9-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009. Google Scholar
[9]	P. W. Ferrez and J. d. R. Millán, Error-related EEG potentials generated during simulated brain–computer interaction, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 55 (2008), 923-929. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2007.908083. Google Scholar
[10]	J. Grosek and J. N. Kutz, Dynamic mode decomposition for real-time background/foreground separation in video, arXiv preprint, arXiv: 1404.7592. Google Scholar
[11]	M. Gu and S. C. Eisenstat, A Stable and Fast Algorithm for Updating the Singular Value Decomposition, Technical Report YALEU/DCS/RR-966, Department of Computer Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 1993. Google Scholar
[12]	M. Hemati, E. Deem, M. Williams, C. W. Rowley and L. N. Cattafesta, Improving separation control with noise-robust variants of dynamic mode decomposition, in 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, (2016), 1103. doi: 10.2514/6.2016-1103. Google Scholar
[13]	M. S. Hemati, M. O. Williams and C. W. Rowley, Dynamic mode decomposition for large and streaming datasets, Physics of Fluids, 26 (2014), 111701. doi: 10.1063/1.4901016. Google Scholar
[14]	T. K. Huckle, Efficient computation of sparse approximate inverses, Numer. Linear Algebra Appl., 5 (1998), 57-71. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1506(199801/02)5:1<57::AID-NLA129>3.0.CO;2-C. Google Scholar
[15]	R. Isermann and M. Münchhof, Identification of Dynamic Systems: An Introduction with Applications, Springer, Heidelberg, 2011. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-78879-9. Google Scholar
[16]	S. M. Kay, Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing, Prentice Hall PTR, 1993. Google Scholar
[17]	B. O. Koopman, Hamiltonian systems and transformation in Hilbert space, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 17 (1931), 315-318. doi: 10.1073/pnas.17.5.315. Google Scholar
[18]	M. Korda and I. Mezić, Linear predictors for nonlinear dynamical systems: Koopman operator meets model predictive control, Automatica J. IFAC, 93 (2018), 149-160. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2018.03.046. Google Scholar
[19]	J. N. Kutz, S. L. Brunton, B. W. Brunton and J. L. Proctor, Dynamic Mode Decomposition: Data-Driven Modeling of Complex Systems, vol. 149, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA, 2016. doi: 10.1137/1.9781611974508. Google Scholar
[20]	S. Maćešić, N. Črnjarić-Žic and I. Mezić, Koopman operator family spectrum for nonautonomous systems-part 1, arXiv preprint, arXiv: 1703.07324. Google Scholar
[21]	D. Matsumoto and T. Indinger, On-the-fly algorithm for dynamic mode decomposition using incremental singular value decomposition and total least squares, arXiv preprint, arXiv: 1703.11004. Google Scholar
[22]	C. Meyer, Matrix Analysis and Applied Linear Algebra, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 2000. doi: 10.1137/1.9780898719512. Google Scholar
[23]	I. Mezić, Spectral properties of dynamical systems, model reduction and decompositions, Nonlinear Dynam., 41 (2005), 309-325. doi: 10.1007/s11071-005-2824-x. Google Scholar
[24]	I. Mezić, Analysis of fluid fows via spectral properties of the Koopman operator, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 45 (2013), 357-378. doi: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-011212-140652. Google Scholar
[25]	I. Mezić and A. Banaszuk, Comparison of systems with complex behavior, Phys. D, 197 (2004), 101-133. doi: 10.1016/j.physd.2004.06.015. Google Scholar
[26]	G. M. Oxberry, T. Kostova-Vassilevska, W. Arrighi and K. Chand, Limited-memory adaptive snapshot selection for proper orthogonal decomposition, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 109 (2017), 198-217. doi: 10.1002/nme.5283. Google Scholar
[27]	J. L. Proctor, S. L. Brunton and J. N. Kutz, Dynamic mode decomposition with control, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst., 15 (2016), 142-161. doi: 10.1137/15M1013857. Google Scholar
[28]	J. L. Proctor and P. A. Eckhoff, Discovering dynamic patterns from infectious disease data using dynamic mode decomposition, International Health, 7 (2015), 139-145. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihv009. Google Scholar
[29]	C. W. Rowley, I. Mezić, S. Bagheri, P. Schlatter and D. S. Henningson, Spectral analysis of nonlinear flows, J. Fluid Mech., 641 (2009), 115-127. doi: 10.1017/S0022112009992059. Google Scholar
[30]	P. J. Schmid, Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data, J. Fluid Mech., 656 (2010), 5-28. doi: 10.1017/S0022112010001217. Google Scholar
[31]	J. Sherman and W. J. Morrison, Adjustment of an inverse matrix corresponding to a change in one element of a given matrix, Ann. Math. Statistics, 21 (1950), 124-127. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177729893. Google Scholar
[32]	A. Surana, Koopman operator based nonlinear dynamic textures, in 2015 American Control Conference (ACC), IEEE, 2015, 1333–1338. doi: 10.1109/ACC.2015.7170918. Google Scholar
[33]	J. H. Tu, C. W. Rowley, D. M. Luchtenburg, S. L. Brunton and J. N. Kutz, On dynamic mode decomposition: Theory and applications, J. Comput. Dyn., 1 (2014), 391-421. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2014.1.391. Google Scholar
[34]	M. O. Williams, I. G. Kevrekidis and C. W. Rowley, A data–driven approximation of the Koopman operator: Extending dynamic mode decomposition, J. Nonlinear Sci., 25 (2015), 1307-1346. doi: 10.1007/s00332-015-9258-5. Google Scholar
[35]	H. Zhang, C. W. Rowley, E. A. Deem and L. N. Cattafesta, Online dynamic mode decomposition for time-varying systems, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst., 18 (2019), 1586-1609. doi: 10.1137/18M1192329. Google Scholar

Figure 1. Topographical view for EEG channels with the channel FCz, where the ErrPs can be characterized, marked in red bold font

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2. The average response to an event at $ t = 0 $: the mean ERP (confidence level = $ 95\% $) at the FCz channel (left panel) and the topographical view for brain activity across all channels (right panel). The top and middle panels show the patterns during the correct event and the erroneous event, respectively. The bottom panel shows that ErrP obtained by subtracting the signal associated with the correct event from that of the erroneous event. The topographical views are shown at the three characterizing peaks that occur at $ 200 $ msec, $ 260 $ msec, and $ 360 $ msec, respectively

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3. The mean of the normalized RMS prediction error computed over all iterations as well as the associated 95% confidence sets for (a) correct events and (b) erroneous events

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 13. Normalized RMS error for a future-window of $ 64 $ samples of EEG states at channel FCz using incremental DMD with $ \sigma_{\text{thr}} = 0.01 $ (left panel), incremental DMD with $ \sigma_{\text{thr}} = 0.001 $ (middle panel), and online DMD (right panel) for (a) correct event, and (b) erroneous event

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4. Predicted ERP signal at channel FCz using incremental DMD with $ \sigma_{\text{thr}} = 0.01 $ (left panel), incremental DMD with $ \sigma_{\text{thr}} = 0.001 $ (middle panel), and online DMD (right panel) for (a) correct event, and (b) erroneous event

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 5. Normalized RMS error for the predicted ERP signal at channel FCz for correct events (left panel) and erroneous events (right panel), using (a) incremental DMD, and (b) online DMD

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 14. Normalized RMS error of ERP prediction using weighted incremental DMD with initial window of $ 128 $ samples during (a) correct event, and (b) Erroneous event

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 15. Normalized RMS error of ERP prediction using windowed incremental DMD with different window sizes during (a) correct event, and (b) Erroneous event

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 6. The predicted ERP signal at channel FCz based on well conditioned EEG datasets using incremental DMD model (left panel) and online DMD model (right panel) during (a) correct events and (b) erroneous events

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 7. Topographical views for the real part part of the $ 4 $ dominant DMD modes during correct events using threshold values of (a) $ \sigma_{\text{thr}} = 0.01 $, and (b) $ \sigma_{\text{thr}} = 0.001 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 8. Topographical views for the real part of the $ 4 $ dominant DMD modes during erroneous events using threshold values of (a) $ \sigma_{\text{thr}} = 0.01 $, and (b) $ \sigma_{\text{thr}} = 0.001 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 9. The left panel show the continuous time DMD eigenvalues for $ \sigma_{\text{thr}} = 0.01 $ and the right panel shows the continuous time DMD eigenvalues for $ \sigma_{\text{thr}} = 0.001 $ during (a) correct events (b) erroneous events

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 10. Reconstructed ERP signal at channel FCz using incremental DMD with $ \sigma_{thr} = 0.01 $ (left panel), incremental DMD with $ \sigma_{thr} = 0.001 $ (middle panel), and online DMD (right panel) for (a) correct events and (b) erroneous events.

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 11. Normalized RMS error for the reconstructed ERP signal at channel FCz for correct events (left panel) and erroneous events (right panel), using (a) incremental DMD, and (b) online DMD

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 12. The Frobenius norm of prediction error for a future-window of 10 samples using (a) weighted incremental DMD (red line) and weighted incremental DMDc(blue line), and (b) windowed incremental DMD (red line) and windowed incremental DMDc (blue line)

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

[1]	Jonathan H. Tu, Clarence W. Rowley, Dirk M. Luchtenburg, Steven L. Brunton, J. Nathan Kutz. On dynamic mode decomposition: Theory and applications. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2014, 1 (2) : 391-421. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2014.1.391
[2]	Steven L. Brunton, Joshua L. Proctor, Jonathan H. Tu, J. Nathan Kutz. Compressed sensing and dynamic mode decomposition. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2015, 2 (2) : 165-191. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2015002
[3]	Hao Zhang, Scott T. M. Dawson, Clarence W. Rowley, Eric A. Deem, Louis N. Cattafesta. Evaluating the accuracy of the dynamic mode decomposition. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2020, 7 (1) : 35-56. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2020002
[4]	Stefano Almi, Massimo Fornasier, Richard Huber. Data-driven evolutions of critical points. Foundations of Data Science, 2020, 2 (3) : 207-255. doi: 10.3934/fods.2020011
[5]	Le Viet Cuong, Thai Son Doan. Assignability of dichotomy spectra for discrete time-varying linear control systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020, 25 (9) : 3597-3607. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020074
[6]	Tingwen Huang, Guanrong Chen, Juergen Kurths. Synchronization of chaotic systems with time-varying coupling delays. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2011, 16 (4) : 1071-1082. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2011.16.1071
[7]	Mojtaba F. Fathi, Ahmadreza Baghaie, Ali Bakhshinejad, Raphael H. Sacho, Roshan M. D'Souza. Time-resolved denoising using model order reduction, dynamic mode decomposition, and kalman filter and smoother. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2020, 7 (2) : 469-487. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2020019
[8]	Michael Herty, Adrian Fazekas, Giuseppe Visconti. A two-dimensional data-driven model for traffic flow on highways. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2018, 13 (2) : 217-240. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2018010
[9]	Matthew O. Williams, Clarence W. Rowley, Ioannis G. Kevrekidis. A kernel-based method for data-driven koopman spectral analysis. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2015, 2 (2) : 247-265. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2015005
[10]	Tieliang Gong, Chen Xu, Hong Chen. Modal additive models with data-driven structure identification. Mathematical Foundations of Computing, 2020, 3 (3) : 165-183. doi: 10.3934/mfc.2020016
[11]	Xin-Guang Yang, Jing Zhang, Shu Wang. Stability and dynamics of a weak viscoelastic system with memory and nonlinear time-varying delay. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020, 40 (3) : 1493-1515. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020084
[12]	Dinh Cong Huong, Mai Viet Thuan. State transformations of time-varying delay systems and their applications to state observer design. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2017, 10 (3) : 413-444. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2017020
[13]	K. Aruna Sakthi, A. Vinodkumar. Stabilization on input time-varying delay for linear switched systems with truncated predictor control. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2020, 10 (2) : 237-247. doi: 10.3934/naco.2019050
[14]	Hongjie Dong, Seick Kim. Green's functions for parabolic systems of second order in time-varying domains. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2014, 13 (4) : 1407-1433. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2014.13.1407
[15]	Wei Feng, Xin Lu. Global stability in a class of reaction-diffusion systems with time-varying delays. Conference Publications, 1998, 1998 (Special) : 253-261. doi: 10.3934/proc.1998.1998.253
[16]	Larbi Berrahmoune. Null controllability for distributed systems with time-varying constraint and applications to parabolic-like equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020, 25 (8) : 3275-3303. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020062
[17]	Lizhao Yan, Fei Xu, Yongzeng Lai, Mingyong Lai. Stability strategies of manufacturing-inventory systems with unknown time-varying demand. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (4) : 2033-2047. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017030
[18]	Mohammad-Sahadet Hossain. Projection-based model reduction for time-varying descriptor systems: New results. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2016, 6 (1) : 73-90. doi: 10.3934/naco.2016.6.73
[19]	Hongbiao Fan, Jun-E Feng, Min Meng. Piecewise observers of rectangular discrete fuzzy descriptor systems with multiple time-varying delays. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2016, 12 (4) : 1535-1556. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016.12.1535
[20]	Wenjun Liu, Biqing Zhu, Gang Li, Danhua Wang. General decay for a viscoelastic Kirchhoff equation with Balakrishnan-Taylor damping, dynamic boundary conditions and a time-varying delay term. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2017, 6 (2) : 239-260. doi: 10.3934/eect.2017013

Impact Factor:

Tools

Metrics

Other articles
by authors

on AIMS
Mustaffa Alfatlawi Vaibhav Srivastava
on Google Scholar
Mustaffa Alfatlawi Vaibhav Srivastava

Impact Factor:

Tools

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Impact Factor:

Tools

Figures and Tables

Impact Factor:

Tools

Metrics

Other articles
by authors

on AIMS
Mustaffa Alfatlawi Vaibhav Srivastava
on Google Scholar
Mustaffa Alfatlawi Vaibhav Srivastava

[Back to Top]