Continuation methods for principal foliations of embedded surfaces

Previous Article
Determining the global manifold structure of a continuous-time heterodimensional cycle
JCD Home
This Issue
Next Article
Sensitivity analysis for periodic orbits and quasiperiodic invariant tori using the adjoint method

July 2022, 9(3): 371-392. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2022007

Continuation methods for principal foliations of embedded surfaces

John Guckenheimer

Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14852 USA

Received September 2021 Revised October 2021 Published July 2022 Early access April 2022

Continuation methods are a well established tool for following equilibria and periodic orbits in dynamical systems as a parameter is varied. Properly formulated, they locate and classify bifurcations of these key components of phase portraits. Principal foliations of surfaces embedded in $ \mathbb{R}^3 $ resemble phase portraits of two dimensional vector fields, but they are not orientable. In the spirit of dynamical systems theory, Gutierrez and Sotomayor investigated qualitative geometric features that characterize structurally stable principal foliations and their bifurcations in one parameter families. This paper computes return maps and applies continuation methods to obtain new insight into bifurcations of principal foliations.

Umbilics are the singularities of principal foliations and lines of curvature connecting umbilics are analogous to homoclinic and heteroclinic bifurcations of vector fields. Here, a continuation method tracks a periodic line of curvature in a family of surfaces that deforms an ellipsoid. One of the bifurcations of these periodic lines of curvature are connections between lemon umbilics. Differences between these bifurcations and analogous saddle connections in two dimensional vector fields are emphasized. A second case study tracks umbilics in a one parameter family of surfaces with continuation methods and locates their bifurcations using Taylor expansions in "Monge coordinates." Return maps that are generalized interval exchange maps of a circle are constructed for generic surfaces with no monstar umbilics.

Keywords: Dimension theory, Poincaré recurrences, multifractal analysis.

Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 58F15, 58F17; Secondary: 53C35.

Citation: John Guckenheimer. Continuation methods for principal foliations of embedded surfaces. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2022, 9 (3) : 371-392. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2022007

References:

[1]	M. V. Berry and J. H. Hannay, Umbilic points on gaussian random surfaces, J. Physics A: Mathematical and General, 10 (1977), 1809-1821.
[2]	J. W. Bruce and D. L. Fidal, On binary differential equations and umbilics, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A, 111 (1989), 147-168. doi: 10.1017/S0308210500025087.
[3]	F. Cazals, J.-C. Faugère, M. Pouget and F. Rouillier, The implicit structure of ridges of a smooth parametric surface, Comput. Aided Geom. Design, 23 (2006), 582-598. doi: 10.1016/j.cagd.2006.04.002.
[4]	H. Dankowicz and F. Schilder, Recipes for Continuation, Computational Science & Engineering, 11. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA, 2013. doi: 10.1137/1.9781611972573.
[5]	G. Darboux, Leç cons Sur La Théorie Générale des Surfaces et Les Applications Géométriques du Calcul Infinitésimal, Réimpression de la premiéreédition de 1896. Chelsea Publishing Co., Bronx, N. Y., 1972.
[6]	W. de Melo and S. van Strien, One-Dimensional Dynamics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-78043-1.
[7]	A. Dhooge, W. Govaerts and Y. A. Kuznetsov, MATCONT: A MATLAB package for numerical bifurcation analysis of ODEs, ACM Trans. Math. Software, 29 (2003), 141-164. doi: 10.1145/779359.779362.
[8]	M. P. do Carmo, Differential Geometry of Curves & Surfaces, Dover Publications, Inc., Mineola, NY, 2016, Revised & updated second edition of [MR0394451].
[9]	E. Doedel, H. B. Keller and J.-P. Kernévez, Numerical analysis and control of bifurcation problems. I. Bifurcation in finite dimensions, Internat. J. Bifur. Chaos Appl. Sci. Engrg., 1 (1991), 493-520. doi: 10.1142/S0218127491000397.
[10]	C. Dupin, Développements de Géométrie, Corcier, Paris, 1813.
[11]	W. J. F. Govaerts, Numerical Methods for Bifurcations of Dynamical Equilibria, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA, 2000. doi: 10.1137/1.9780898719543.
[12]	J. Guckenheimer, Bifurcations of dynamical systems, In Dynamical systems (C.I.M.E. Summer School, Bressanone, 1978), Progr. Math., Birkhäuser, Boston, Mass., 8 (1980), 115–231.
[13]	J. Guckenheimer, Dense lines of curvature on convex surfaces, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 148 (2020), 3537-3549. doi: 10.1090/proc/14981.
[14]	C. Gutiérrez and J. Sotomayor, Closed principal lines and bifurcation, Bol. Soc. Brasil. Mat., 17 (1986), 1-19. doi: 10.1007/BF02585473.
[15]	C. Gutiérrez and J. Sotomayor, Periodic lines of curvature bifurcating from Darbouxian umbilical connections, In Bifurcations of Planar Vector Fields (Luminy, 1989), Lecture Notes in Math., Springer, Berlin, 1455 (1990), 196–229. doi: 10.1007/BFb0085394.
[16]	E. Hairer, S. P. Nørsett and G. Wanner, Solving Ordinary Differential Equations, 2$^nd$ edition, Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, 8. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993.
[17]	M. W. Hirsch, S. Smale and R. L. Devaney, Differential Equations, Dynamical Systems, and An Introduction to Chaos, 3$^{rd}$ edition, Elsevier/Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2013. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-382010-5.00001-4.
[18]	Y. Katznelson and D. Ornstein, The differentiability of the conjugation of certain diffeomorphisms of the circle, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 9 (1989), 643-680. doi: 10.1017/S0143385700005277.
[19]	B. Krauskopf, H. M. Osinga and J. Galán-Vioque (eds.), Numerical Continuation Methods for Dynamical Systems, Understanding Complex Systems, Springer, Dordrecht, 2007, Path following and boundary value problems, Dedicated to Eusebius J. Doedel for his 60th birthday. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6356-5.
[20]	Y. A. Kuznetsov, Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory, 3$^{rd}$ edition, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2004. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-3978-7.
[21]	S. Marmi, P. Moussa and J.-C. Yoccoz, Linearization of generalized interval exchange maps, Ann. of Math. (2), 176 (2012), 1583-1646. doi: 10.4007/annals.2012.176.3.5.
[22]	M. Martens, S. van Strien, W. de Melo and P. Mendes, On Cherry flows, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 10 (1990), 531-554. doi: 10.1017/S0143385700005733.
[23]	G. Monge, Sur les lignes de courbure de la surface de l'ellipsoide, In Application de l'Analyse á la Géometrie (5th edition), Bachelier, Paris, 1796,139–160.
[24]	M. M. Peixoto, Structural stability on two-dimensional manifolds, Topology, 1 (1962), 101-120. doi: 10.1016/0040-9383(65)90018-2.
[25]	I. R. Porteous, Geometric Differentiation, For the Intelligence of Curves and Surfaces, 2$^{nd}$ edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001.
[26]	Y. G. Sinaǐ and K. M. Khanin, Smoothness of conjugacies of diffeomorphisms of the circle with rotations, Russian Math. Surveys, 44 (1989), 69-99. doi: 10.1070/RM1989v044n01ABEH002008.
[27]	J. Sotomayor and C. Gutiérrez, Structurally stable configurations of lines of principal curvature, In Bifurcation, Ergodic Theory and Applications (Dijon, 1981), Astérisque, Soc. Math. France, Paris, 98 (1982), 195–215.
[28]	J. Sotomayor and C. Gutiérrez, Configurations of lines of principal curvature and their bifurcations, In Colloquium on Dynamical Systems (Guanajuato, 1983), Aportaciones Mat., Soc. Mat. Mexicana, México, 1 (1985), 115–126.
[29]	J. Sotomayor and R. Garcia, Lines of curvature on surfaces, historical comments and recent developments, São Paulo J. Math. Sci., 2 (2008), 99-143. doi: 10.11606/issn.2316-9028.v2i1p99-143.
[30]	J. Sotomayor and C. Gutiérrez, Structurally Stable Configurations of Lines of Curvature and Umbilic Points on Surfaces, Instituto de Matemática y Ciencias Afines, IMCA, Lima; Universidad Nacional de Ingenieria, Instituto de Matemáticas Puras y Aplicadas, Lima, 1998.
[31]	M. Viana, Ergodic theory of interval exchange maps, Rev. Mat. Complut., 19 (2006), 7-100. doi: 10.5209/rev_REMA.2006.v19.n1.16621.
[32]	E. Zeeman, The umbilic bracelet and the double-cusp catastrophe, In Structural Stability, the Theory of Catastrophes, and Applications in the Sciences, Lecture Notes in Math., 525 (1976), 328–366.

show all references

References:

[1]	M. V. Berry and J. H. Hannay, Umbilic points on gaussian random surfaces, J. Physics A: Mathematical and General, 10 (1977), 1809-1821.
[2]	J. W. Bruce and D. L. Fidal, On binary differential equations and umbilics, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A, 111 (1989), 147-168. doi: 10.1017/S0308210500025087.
[3]	F. Cazals, J.-C. Faugère, M. Pouget and F. Rouillier, The implicit structure of ridges of a smooth parametric surface, Comput. Aided Geom. Design, 23 (2006), 582-598. doi: 10.1016/j.cagd.2006.04.002.
[4]	H. Dankowicz and F. Schilder, Recipes for Continuation, Computational Science & Engineering, 11. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA, 2013. doi: 10.1137/1.9781611972573.
[5]	G. Darboux, Leç cons Sur La Théorie Générale des Surfaces et Les Applications Géométriques du Calcul Infinitésimal, Réimpression de la premiéreédition de 1896. Chelsea Publishing Co., Bronx, N. Y., 1972.
[6]	W. de Melo and S. van Strien, One-Dimensional Dynamics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-78043-1.
[7]	A. Dhooge, W. Govaerts and Y. A. Kuznetsov, MATCONT: A MATLAB package for numerical bifurcation analysis of ODEs, ACM Trans. Math. Software, 29 (2003), 141-164. doi: 10.1145/779359.779362.
[8]	M. P. do Carmo, Differential Geometry of Curves & Surfaces, Dover Publications, Inc., Mineola, NY, 2016, Revised & updated second edition of [MR0394451].
[9]	E. Doedel, H. B. Keller and J.-P. Kernévez, Numerical analysis and control of bifurcation problems. I. Bifurcation in finite dimensions, Internat. J. Bifur. Chaos Appl. Sci. Engrg., 1 (1991), 493-520. doi: 10.1142/S0218127491000397.
[10]	C. Dupin, Développements de Géométrie, Corcier, Paris, 1813.
[11]	W. J. F. Govaerts, Numerical Methods for Bifurcations of Dynamical Equilibria, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA, 2000. doi: 10.1137/1.9780898719543.
[12]	J. Guckenheimer, Bifurcations of dynamical systems, In Dynamical systems (C.I.M.E. Summer School, Bressanone, 1978), Progr. Math., Birkhäuser, Boston, Mass., 8 (1980), 115–231.
[13]	J. Guckenheimer, Dense lines of curvature on convex surfaces, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 148 (2020), 3537-3549. doi: 10.1090/proc/14981.
[14]	C. Gutiérrez and J. Sotomayor, Closed principal lines and bifurcation, Bol. Soc. Brasil. Mat., 17 (1986), 1-19. doi: 10.1007/BF02585473.
[15]	C. Gutiérrez and J. Sotomayor, Periodic lines of curvature bifurcating from Darbouxian umbilical connections, In Bifurcations of Planar Vector Fields (Luminy, 1989), Lecture Notes in Math., Springer, Berlin, 1455 (1990), 196–229. doi: 10.1007/BFb0085394.
[16]	E. Hairer, S. P. Nørsett and G. Wanner, Solving Ordinary Differential Equations, 2$^nd$ edition, Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, 8. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993.
[17]	M. W. Hirsch, S. Smale and R. L. Devaney, Differential Equations, Dynamical Systems, and An Introduction to Chaos, 3$^{rd}$ edition, Elsevier/Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2013. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-382010-5.00001-4.
[18]	Y. Katznelson and D. Ornstein, The differentiability of the conjugation of certain diffeomorphisms of the circle, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 9 (1989), 643-680. doi: 10.1017/S0143385700005277.
[19]	B. Krauskopf, H. M. Osinga and J. Galán-Vioque (eds.), Numerical Continuation Methods for Dynamical Systems, Understanding Complex Systems, Springer, Dordrecht, 2007, Path following and boundary value problems, Dedicated to Eusebius J. Doedel for his 60th birthday. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6356-5.
[20]	Y. A. Kuznetsov, Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory, 3$^{rd}$ edition, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2004. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-3978-7.
[21]	S. Marmi, P. Moussa and J.-C. Yoccoz, Linearization of generalized interval exchange maps, Ann. of Math. (2), 176 (2012), 1583-1646. doi: 10.4007/annals.2012.176.3.5.
[22]	M. Martens, S. van Strien, W. de Melo and P. Mendes, On Cherry flows, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 10 (1990), 531-554. doi: 10.1017/S0143385700005733.
[23]	G. Monge, Sur les lignes de courbure de la surface de l'ellipsoide, In Application de l'Analyse á la Géometrie (5th edition), Bachelier, Paris, 1796,139–160.
[24]	M. M. Peixoto, Structural stability on two-dimensional manifolds, Topology, 1 (1962), 101-120. doi: 10.1016/0040-9383(65)90018-2.
[25]	I. R. Porteous, Geometric Differentiation, For the Intelligence of Curves and Surfaces, 2$^{nd}$ edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001.
[26]	Y. G. Sinaǐ and K. M. Khanin, Smoothness of conjugacies of diffeomorphisms of the circle with rotations, Russian Math. Surveys, 44 (1989), 69-99. doi: 10.1070/RM1989v044n01ABEH002008.
[27]	J. Sotomayor and C. Gutiérrez, Structurally stable configurations of lines of principal curvature, In Bifurcation, Ergodic Theory and Applications (Dijon, 1981), Astérisque, Soc. Math. France, Paris, 98 (1982), 195–215.
[28]	J. Sotomayor and C. Gutiérrez, Configurations of lines of principal curvature and their bifurcations, In Colloquium on Dynamical Systems (Guanajuato, 1983), Aportaciones Mat., Soc. Mat. Mexicana, México, 1 (1985), 115–126.
[29]	J. Sotomayor and R. Garcia, Lines of curvature on surfaces, historical comments and recent developments, São Paulo J. Math. Sci., 2 (2008), 99-143. doi: 10.11606/issn.2316-9028.v2i1p99-143.
[30]	J. Sotomayor and C. Gutiérrez, Structurally Stable Configurations of Lines of Curvature and Umbilic Points on Surfaces, Instituto de Matemática y Ciencias Afines, IMCA, Lima; Universidad Nacional de Ingenieria, Instituto de Matemáticas Puras y Aplicadas, Lima, 1998.
[31]	M. Viana, Ergodic theory of interval exchange maps, Rev. Mat. Complut., 19 (2006), 7-100. doi: 10.5209/rev_REMA.2006.v19.n1.16621.
[32]	E. Zeeman, The umbilic bracelet and the double-cusp catastrophe, In Structural Stability, the Theory of Catastrophes, and Applications in the Sciences, Lecture Notes in Math., 525 (1976), 328–366.

Figure 1. Splitting of an umbilic connection in $ S_\lambda $ when $ \lambda = 0.001 $. The separatrices of umbilics $ u_l $ and $ u_r $ are drawn green and blue. The line of curvature heading right from point $ w_0 $ is drawn black, and its first five crossings of cross-section $ \Sigma $ are labelled $ w_1,w_2,w_3,w_4,w_5 $. This line of curvature stays to the right of the green separatrix of $ u_l $ between $ w_0 $ and $ w_1 $, then passes left of $ u_l $ and right of the blue separatrix of $ u_r $ into the channel between the two separatrices, intersecting $ \Sigma $ from left to right at $ w_2 $. From $ w_2 $ it turns around $ u_r $ to the left of the separatrix of $ u_l $, next crossing $ \Sigma $ from right to left at $ w_3 $. From $ w_3 $ it turns around $ u_l $ with the separatrix of $ u_r $ on its right and the next turn of the separatrix of $ u_l $ on its left. It then crosses $ \Sigma $ from left to right at $ w_4 $ and finally crosses $ \Sigma $ again from right to left at $ w_5 $. Note that while the line of curvature originally headed right from $ \Sigma $ at $ w_0 $, it crosses $ \Sigma $ in the opposite direction at $ w_5 $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2. Graph of the return map $ \sigma $ and its fifth iterate for the surface $ S_{0.1857} $. The cross-section $ \Sigma $ is parameterized as $ [0,\sqrt{3}\cos(\theta),\sqrt{5}\sin(\theta)],\, \theta \in [-\pi,\pi] $. Values of the maps are displayed on a mesh of $ 1000 $ points

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3. Graph of $ \sigma^5(\theta) - \theta $. Note that $ \sigma^5 $ has fixed points and breaks

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4. The derivative of $ \sigma $, showing four jump discontinuities

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 5. Two closed lines of curvature on the surface $ S_{0.1857} $. The umbilics are drawn as red dots

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 6. Values of $ (\theta,\lambda) $ at which the return maps $ \sigma_{\lambda} $ of the surfaces $ S_{\lambda} $ have periodic orbits of period 5

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 7. The geometry of closed lines of curvature near an umbilic connection. The blue curve is an umbilic connection computed at $ \lambda = 0.185952861855609 $. The green curve $ \gamma $ is a closed line of curvature on $ S_{0.1857} $. Its intersections $ s_j $ with cross-section $ x = 0 $ (light black dotted curve) are marked by black dots. Umbilics are red dots. The point $ s_0 $ is the initial point of $ \gamma $, and its period $ 5 $ trajectory for the return map $ \sigma $ is $ s_{0},s_{2},s_{4},s_{6},s_{8},s_{10} = s_{0} $. Note that between $ s_2 $ and $ s_3 $, the line of curvature comes close to the umbilic $ u_1 $, following its separatrix in one direction before the turn and in the other direction after the turn. The $ \sigma $ trajectory of $ s_5 $ is $ s_{5},s_{7},s_{9},s_{1},s_{3} $, lying on the same line of curvature but following it with the opposite orientation

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 8. Values of $ (\theta,\lambda) $ at which the return maps $ \sigma_{\lambda} $ of the surfaces $ S_{\lambda} $ have periodic orbits of period 5 for $ \theta \in [-2.75,-2.65] $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 9. The surface $ S_{0.24} $ defined by Equation (3) with $ b = 0.24 $. The surface is plotted in a tan color. The six umbilic points are red dots and segments of their separatrices up to intersections with the cross-section $ x = 2y $ are drawn as heavy blue curves. The cross-section is a thin black curve. A long segment of a single line of curvature is plotted as a brown curve. Note that the separatrix of the lowest umbilic in the figure passes close enough to another lemon umbilic that the gap between them cannot be seen at this scale

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 10. The $ z $ coordinate of umbilic points of the surfaces $ S_b $ plotted as a function of $ b $. Turning points on the curves occur at parameters where star and monstar umbilics merge and disappear, analogous to a saddle-node bifurcation of vector fields. Note that there are ranges of parameters with four, six and eight umbilic points

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 11. The $ z $ coordinate of umbilic points of the surfaces $ S_b $ plotted as a function of $ b $. Turning points on the curves, marked with blue crosses, occur at parameters where star and monstar umbilics merge and disappear. Large green dots mark monstar-lemon transitions

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 12. The return map $ \sigma $ of the surface $ S_{0.24} $. The cross-section $ \Sigma $ is a closed curve parameterized as $ (2r(\theta)\cos(\theta),r(\theta)\cos(\theta),r(\theta)\sin(\theta)) $ where $ r(\theta) $ is computed numerically so that $ \Sigma $ lies on $ S_{0.24} $. Lines of curvature starting at 1000 points on $ \Sigma $ are computed to their second return with $ \Sigma $. There are three discontinuities at intersections of the star umbilic separatrices with $ \Sigma $. Between each pair of discontinuities, $ \sigma $ is increasing. It has breaks (jumps in its first derivative) at intersections of the separatrices of lemon umbilics with $ \Sigma $. Apart from its discontinuities, $ \sigma $ is bijective

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 13. Successive returns of a long line of curvature on the surface $ S_{0.24} $. Over $ 42,000 $ returns are plotted as blue dots. If the line of curvature is dense in $ S_{0.24} $, its succesive returns would fill the graph of the return map $ \sigma $ densely. Here, quite large gaps remain despite the large number of returns. Nonetheless, the line of curvature does not seem to approach one that is closed. If that were the case, the successive returns would approach a discrete set of points in the intersection of the line of curvature and the cross-section. Here, a plot of only the last 1000 successive returns of this line of curvature produces a graph visually indistinguishable from this one

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 14. Principal foliation of $ S_{0.2233} $. Umbilic separatrices are heavy blue curves

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 15. Region near the star and monstar of $ S_{0.2233} $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 16. The return map $ \sigma $ of $ S_{0.2233} $ to the cross-section $ x = 2y $. In comparison to the return map of $ S_{0.24} $ shown in figure 12, there are gaps in the domain and {image of $ \sigma $.} These come from lines of curvature that tend to the monstar umbilic and do not return to the cross-section

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 17. A (near) umbilic connection (blue) between a star umbilic (large red dot) and a lemon umbilic for $ S_{0.2447609874} $. The second and third separatrices tend to the same closed line of curvature, plotted green

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

[1]	V. Afraimovich, J. Schmeling, Edgardo Ugalde, Jesús Urías. Spectra of dimensions for Poincaré recurrences. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2000, 6 (4) : 901-914. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2000.6.901
[2]	B. Fernandez, E. Ugalde, J. Urías. Spectrum of dimensions for Poincaré recurrences of Markov maps. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2002, 8 (4) : 835-849. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2002.8.835
[3]	Juan Wang, Xiaodan Zhang, Yun Zhao. Dimension estimates for arbitrary subsets of limit sets of a Markov construction and related multifractal analysis. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2014, 34 (5) : 2315-2332. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.2315
[4]	Godofredo Iommi, Bartłomiej Skorulski. Multifractal analysis for the exponential family. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2006, 16 (4) : 857-869. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.16.857
[5]	V. Afraimovich, Jean-René Chazottes, Benoît Saussol. Pointwise dimensions for Poincaré recurrences associated with maps and special flows. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2003, 9 (2) : 263-280. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2003.9.263
[6]	Julien Barral, Yan-Hui Qu. On the higher-dimensional multifractal analysis. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2012, 32 (6) : 1977-1995. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.1977
[7]	Mario Roy, Mariusz Urbański. Multifractal analysis for conformal graph directed Markov systems. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2009, 25 (2) : 627-650. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.25.627
[8]	Zhihui Yuan. Multifractal analysis of random weak Gibbs measures. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2017, 37 (10) : 5367-5405. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017234
[9]	Luis Barreira. Dimension theory of flows: A survey. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2015, 20 (10) : 3345-3362. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2015.20.3345
[10]	Luis Barreira, César Silva. Lyapunov exponents for continuous transformations and dimension theory. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2005, 13 (2) : 469-490. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2005.13.469
[11]	Valentin Afraimovich, Jean-Rene Chazottes and Benoit Saussol. Local dimensions for Poincare recurrences. Electronic Research Announcements, 2000, 6: 64-74.
[12]	Yunping Wang, Ercai Chen, Xiaoyao Zhou. Mean dimension theory in symbolic dynamics for finitely generated amenable groups. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2022 doi: 10.3934/dcds.2022050
[13]	Zied Douzi, Bilel Selmi. On the mutual singularity of multifractal measures. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (1) : 423-432. doi: 10.3934/era.2020024
[14]	Mirela Domijan, Markus Kirkilionis. Graph theory and qualitative analysis of reaction networks. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2008, 3 (2) : 295-322. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2008.3.295
[15]	Jean-Pierre Francoise, Claude Piquet. Global recurrences of multi-time scaled systems. Conference Publications, 2011, 2011 (Special) : 430-436. doi: 10.3934/proc.2011.2011.430
[16]	Balázs Bárány, Michaƚ Rams, Ruxi Shi. On the multifractal spectrum of weighted Birkhoff averages. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2022, 42 (5) : 2461-2497. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2021199
[17]	Jerrold E. Marsden, Alexey Tret'yakov. Factor analysis of nonlinear mappings: p-regularity theory. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2003, 2 (4) : 425-445. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2003.2.425
[18]	Yadong Shu, Ying Dai, Zujun Ma. Evolutionary game theory analysis of supply chain with fairness concerns of retailers. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2022 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2022098
[19]	Lars Olsen. First return times: multifractal spectra and divergence points. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2004, 10 (3) : 635-656. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2004.10.635
[20]	Imen Bhouri, Houssem Tlili. On the multifractal formalism for Bernoulli products of invertible matrices. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2009, 24 (4) : 1129-1145. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.24.1129

Impact Factor:

Tools

Metrics

Other articles
by authors

on AIMS
John Guckenheimer
on Google Scholar
John Guckenheimer

Impact Factor:

Tools

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Impact Factor:

Tools

Figures and Tables

Impact Factor:

Tools

Metrics

Other articles
by authors

on AIMS
John Guckenheimer
on Google Scholar
John Guckenheimer

[Back to Top]