We consider synchrony patterns in coupled phase oscillator networks that correspond to invariant tori. For specific nongeneric coupling, these tori are equilibria relative to a continuous symmetry action. We analyze how the invariant tori deform under forced symmetry breaking as more general network interaction terms are introduced. We first show in general that perturbed tori that are relative equilibria can be computed using a parametrization method; this yields an asymptotic expansion of an embedding of the perturbed torus, as well as the local dynamics on the torus. We then apply this result to a coupled oscillator network, and we numerically study the dynamics on the persisting tori in the network by looking for bifurcations of their periodic orbits in a boundary-value-problem setup. This way we find new bifurcating stable synchrony patterns that can be the building blocks of larger global structures such as heteroclinic cycles.
| Citation: |
Figure 1. Dynamics of system (41) for $ \alpha = \beta = \frac{\pi}{2} $, $ r = 0.2 $ and $ \delta = 0.01 $. Panel (a) shows solutions to the reduced system (51) on the torus $ \mathbb{T}^2 $ described by coordinates $ (\phi_2, \phi_3) $ representing the '$ \mathrm{D} $' populations; these periodic orbits wind around $ \mathbb{T}^2 $. Shown are two stable periodic orbits (blue) at $ \psi\in\{\frac{\pi}{2}, \frac{3\pi}{2}\} $ and two unstable periodic orbits (red) at $ \psi\in\{0, \pi\} $. Panel (b) shows a periodic orbit in the full system that lies on $ \mathrm{SDD} $ for $ \phi_3-\phi_2 = 0 $. Note that the two '$ \mathrm{D} $' populations have approximately the same phase
Figure 2. Bifurcations can stabilize periodic orbits of the full system (16) stemming from $ \mathrm{SDD} $ for a perturbation determined by (19) and (26) that is sufficiently large $ \delta>0 $. The rest of the parameters are as in (52). Panel (a) shows the four branches of hyperbolic periodic orbits $ \gamma_0, \gamma_{\frac{\pi}{2}}, \gamma_{\pi} $ and $ \gamma_{\frac{3\pi}{2}} $ emanating from $ \psi^* \in \big\{0, \frac{\pi}{2}, \pi, \frac{3\pi}{2}\big\} $ at $ \delta = 0 $, bifurcations that change their stability in the full system, and secondary solution branches. The vertical green line at $ \delta = 0 $ represents the unperturbed case, in which the torus $ \mathrm{SDD} $ is foliated by neutrally stable periodic orbits. Panel (b) highlights bifurcations at $ \delta = \delta^* $ that stabilize the branches $ \gamma_0 $ and $ \gamma_{\pi} $ in the full system and corresponding secondary branches of periodic orbits forming isolas
Figure 3. Stable synchrony patterns bifurcating from primary branches of periodic orbits. Panels (a)–(d) show the phase evolution of oscillators in '$ \mathrm{D} $' populations along one period on coexisting stable periodic orbits lying on the secondary branches emanating from $ \psi = 0 $ (bottom) and $ \psi = \pi $ (top) for $ \delta\approx 0.40372 $; see the magnified parameter range in Figure 2(b). Shading indicates the deviation from $ \pi $ of each phase oscillator, where black indicates that $ \theta_{\sigma, k} = \pi $ and white $ \theta_{\sigma, k} = 0 $ or $ 2\pi $
Figure 4. Some codimension-two bifurcations of system (16) with the perturbation driven by (19) and (26). Panel (a) shows curves of saddle-node bifurcation arising on the primary (red) and secondary (magenta) branches that organize the parameter plane $ (r, \delta) $. See the main text for an elaboration on the codimension-two points shown. Panel (b) shows the origin of the primary saddle-node bifurcation as one continues a primary branch of periodic orbits in parameter $ r $, with $ r $ decreasing. This bifurcation gives rise to the curve $ \mathsf{SN}_p $ in Panel (a)
Figure 5. Evolution of periodic orbits along the overlapping principal saddle-node curves $ \mathsf{SN}_p $ in Figure 4. Panels (a)–(d) correspond to the points $ r_a, r_b, r_c, r_d $, respectively. Each panel shows (1) a time series of the coordinate $ \theta_{2, 1} $ with respect to the rescaled {\sc Auto} integration time for orbits on each principal saddle-node curve in green and red, (2) a relative position between the two '$ \mathrm{D} $' populations on each principal saddle-node curve in green and red, and (3) how each '$ \mathrm{D} $' populations deviate from $ \pi $ as $ (r, \delta) $ moves away from the origin
Figure 6. Bifurcations of periodic orbits of the full system (16) with the perturbation driven by (19) and (26) for $ \delta>0 $ for the perturbed torus $ \mathrm{SSD} $. The rest of the parameters are as in Figure 2. Panel (a) shows four branches of hyperbolic periodic orbits $ \gamma_0, \gamma_{\frac{\pi}{2}}, \gamma_{\pi}, \gamma_{\frac{3\pi}{2}} $ emanating from $ \psi^*\in \big\{0, \frac{\pi}{2}, \pi, \frac{3\pi}{2}\big\} $ at $ \delta = 0 $. The vertical green line located at $ \delta = 0 $ represents the unperturbed case, in which the torus $ \mathrm{SSD} $ is foliated by neutrally stable periodic orbits. Panel (b) highlights the isola of secondary branches of periodic orbits emanating from the branch $ \gamma_{\pi} $, and Panel (c) shows a zoom of the origin of the branch of secondary periodic orbits that emanates from $ \gamma_{0} $
| [1] |
GitHub repository symmetry-breaking-23, https://github.com/MujicaJose/symmetry-breaking-23.
|
| [2] |
J. A. Acebrón, L. L. Bonilla, C. J. Pérez Vicente, F. Ritort and R. Spigler, The Kuramoto model: A simple paradigm for synchronization phenomena, Reviews of Modern Physics, 77 (2005), 137-185.
doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.77.137.
|
| [3] |
U. M. Ascher, J. Christiansen and R. D. Russell, Collocation software for boundary value ODEs, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 7 (1981), 209-222.
doi: 10.1145/355945.355950.
|
| [4] |
P. Ashwin, C. Bick and A. Rodrigues, From symmetric networks to heteroclinic dynamics and chaos in coupled phase oscillators with higher-order interactions, in Higher-Order Systems, 2022,197-216.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-91374-8_7.
|
| [5] |
C. Bick, Heteroclinic dynamics of localized frequency synchrony: Heteroclinic cycles for small populations, Journal of Nonlinear Science, 29 (2019), 2547-2570.
doi: 10.1007/s00332-019-09552-5.
|
| [6] |
C. Bick, Heteroclinic switching between chimeras, Physical Review E, 97 (2018), 050201(R).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.97.050201.
|
| [7] |
C. Bick, T. Böhle and C. Kuehn, Higher-order network interactions through phase reduction for oscillators with phase-dependent amplitude, Journal of Nonlinear Science, 34 (2024), Paper No. 77, 34 pp.
doi: 10.1007/s00332-024-10053-3.
|
| [8] |
M. Breakspear, Dynamic models of large-scale brain activity, Nature Neuroscience, 20 (2017), 340-352.
doi: 10.1038/nn.4497.
|
| [9] |
J. Buck and E. Buck, Mechanism of rhythmic synchronous flashing of fireflies, Science, 159 (1968), 1319-1327.
doi: 10.1126/science.159.3821.1319.
|
| [10] |
X. Cabré, E. Fontich and R. de la Llave, The parameterization method for invariant manifolds I: Manifolds associated to non-resonant subspaces, Indiana Univ. Math. J., 52 (2003), 283-328.
doi: 10.1512/iumj.2003.52.2245.
|
| [11] |
X. Cabré, E. Fontich and R. de la Llave, The parameterization method for invariant manifolds II: Regularity with respect to parameters, Indiana Univ. Math. J., 52 (2003), 329-360.
doi: 10.1512/iumj.2003.52.2407.
|
| [12] |
X. Cabré, E. Fontich and R. de la Llave, The parameterization method for invariant manifolds III: Overview and applications, J. Differ. Equ., 218 (2005), 444-515.
doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2004.12.003.
|
| [13] |
C. de Boor and B. Swartz, Collocation at Gaussian points, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 10 (1973), 582-606.
doi: 10.1137/0710052.
|
| [14] |
E. J. Doedel, W. Govaerts and Y. A. Kuznetsov, Computation of periodic solution bifurcations in ODEs using bordered systems, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 41 (2003), 401-435.
doi: 10.1137/S0036142902400779.
|
| [15] |
E. J. Doedel and B. E. Oldeman, AUTO-07p: Continuation and Bifurcation Software for Ordinary Differential Equations, Department of Computer Science, Concordia University, Canada, 2010, With major contributions from A. R. Champneys, F. Dercole, T. F. Fairgrieve, Y. Kuznetsov, R. C. Paffenroth, B. Sandstede, X. J. Wang and C. H. Zhang; available at http://www.cmvl.cs.concordia.ca/.
|
| [16] |
N. Fenichel, Persistence and smoothness of invariant manifolds for flows, Indiana University Mathematics Journal, 21 (1971), 193-226.
doi: 10.1512/iumj.1972.21.21017.
|
| [17] |
M. Golubitsky and I. Stewart, The Symmetry Perspective: From Equilibrium to Chaos in Phase Space and Physical Space, Birkhäuser Basel, 2002.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-8167-8.
|
| [18] |
F. Guyard and R. Lauterbach, Forced symmetry Breaking: Theory and applications, in Pattern Formation in Continuous and Coupled Systems. The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications (eds. M. Golubitsky, D. Luss and S. H. Strogatz), Springer, New York, NY, 1999, chapter 10,121-135.
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-1558-5_10.
|
| [19] |
F. Guyard and R. Lauterbach, Forced symmetry breaking and relative periodic orbits, in Ergodic Theory, Analysis, and Efficient Simulation of Dynamical Systems, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2001,453-468.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-56589-2_20.
|
| [20] |
A. Haro, M. Canadell, J.-L. Figueras, A. Luque and J.-M. Mondelo, The Parameterization Method for Invariant Manifolds, Springer International Publishing, 2016.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-29662-3.
|
| [21] |
B. Krauskopf, H. M. Osinga and J. Galán-Vioque (eds), Numerical Continuation Methods for Dynamical Systems: Path Following and Boundary Value Problems, Springer Netherlands, 2007.
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6356-5.
|
| [22] |
I. León and D. Pazó, Phase reduction beyond the first order: The case of the mean-field complex Ginzburg-Landau equation, Physical Review E, 100 (2019), 012211, 13 pp.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.100.012211.
|
| [23] |
H. Nakao, Phase reduction approach to synchronisation of nonlinear oscillators, Contemporary Physics, 57 (2016), 188-214.
doi: 10.1080/00107514.2015.1094987.
|
| [24] |
O. E. Omel'chenko, The mathematics behind chimera states, Nonlinearity, 31 (2018), R121-R164.
doi: 10.1088/1361-6544/aaaa07.
|
| [25] |
M. J. Panaggio and D. M. Abrams, Chimera states: Coexistence of coherence and incoherence in networks of coupled oscillators, Nonlinearity, 28 (2015), R67-R87.
doi: 10.1088/0951-7715/28/3/R67.
|
| [26] |
A. Pikovsky, M. Rosenblum and J. Kurths, Synchronization: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences, Cambridge University Press, 2003.
doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511755743.
|
| [27] |
F. A. Rodrigues, T. K. D. Peron, P. Ji and J. Kurths, The Kuramoto model in complex networks, Physics Reports, 610 (2016), 1-98.
doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2015.10.008.
|
| [28] |
S. H. Strogatz, From Kuramoto to Crawford: Exploring the onset of synchronization in populations of coupled oscillators, Physica D, 143 (2000), 1-20.
doi: 10.1016/S0167-2789(00)00094-4.
|
| [29] |
S. H. Strogatz, Sync: The Emerging Science of Spontaneous Order, Penguin, 2004.
|
| [30] |
S. H. Strogatz, D. Abrams, A. McRobie, B. Eckhardt and E. Ott, Crowd synchrony on the millennium bridge, Nature, 438 (2005), 43-44.
doi: 10.1038/438043a.
|
| [31] |
S. von der Gracht, E. Nijholt and B. Rink, A parametrisation method for high-order phase reduction in coupled oscillator networks, arXiv: 2306.03320, http://arXiv.org/abs/2306.03320.
|
Dynamics of system (41) for
Bifurcations can stabilize periodic orbits of the full system (16) stemming from
Stable synchrony patterns bifurcating from primary branches of periodic orbits. Panels (a)–(d) show the phase evolution of oscillators in '
Some codimension-two bifurcations of system (16) with the perturbation driven by (19) and (26). Panel (a) shows curves of saddle-node bifurcation arising on the primary (red) and secondary (magenta) branches that organize the parameter plane
Evolution of periodic orbits along the overlapping principal saddle-node curves
Bifurcations of periodic orbits of the full system (16) with the perturbation driven by (19) and (26) for