# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

October  2020, 7(4): 303-315. doi: 10.3934/jdg.2020024

## On the grey Baker-Thompson rule

 1 Süleyman Demirel University, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Industrial Engineering, Isparta, 32260, Turkey 2 Süleyman Demirel University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Business Administration, Isparta, 32260, Turkey 3 Süleyman Demirel University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Mathematics, Isparta, 32260, Turkey

* Corresponding author: zeynepalparslan@yahoo.com

Received  December 2018 Revised  April 2020 Published  August 2020

Cost sharing problems can arise from situations in which some service is provided to a variety of different customers who differ in the amount or type of service they need. One can think of and airports computers, telephones. This paper studies an airport problem which is concerned with the cost sharing of an airstrip between airplanes assuming that one airstrip is sufficient to serve all airplanes. Each airplane needs an airstrip whose length can be different across airplanes. Also, it is important how should the cost of each airstrip be shared among airplanes. The purpose of the present paper is to give an axiomatic characterization of the Baker-Thompson rule by using grey calculus. Further, it is shown that each of our main axioms (population fairness, smallest-cost consistency and balanced population impact) together with various combina tions of our minor axioms characterizes the best-known rule for the problem, namely the Baker-Thompson rule. Finally, it is demonstrated that the grey Shapley value of airport game and the grey Baker-Thompson rule coincides.

Citation: Mehmet Onur Olgun, Osman Palanci, Sirma Zeynep Alparslan Gök. On the grey Baker-Thompson rule. Journal of Dynamics & Games, 2020, 7 (4) : 303-315. doi: 10.3934/jdg.2020024
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
The flowchart of this study
Grey marginal vectors
 $\sigma$ $m_{1}^{\sigma }\left(c^{\prime }\right)$ $m_{2}^{\sigma }\left(c^{\prime }\right)$ $m_{3}^{\sigma }\left(c^{\prime }\right)$ $\sigma _{1} = \left(1, 2, 3\right)$ $m_{1}^{\sigma _{1}}\left(c^{\prime }\right) \in \left[30, 36\right]$ $m_{2}^{\sigma _{1}}\left(c^{\prime }\right) \in \left[14, 18\right]$ $m_{3}^{\sigma _{1}}\left(c^{\prime }\right) \in \left[16, 26\right]$ $\sigma _{2} = \left(1, 3, 2\right)$ $m_{1}^{\sigma _{2}}\left(c^{\prime }\right) \in \left[30, 36\right]$ $m_{2}^{\sigma _{2}}\left(c^{\prime }\right) \in \left[0, 0\right]$ $m_{3}^{\sigma _{2}}\left(c^{\prime }\right) \in \left[30, 44\right]$ $\sigma _{3} = \left(2, 1, 3\right)$ $m_{1}^{\sigma _{3}}\left(c^{\prime }\right) \in \left[0, 0\right]$ $m_{2}^{\sigma _{3}}\left(c^{\prime }\right) \in \left[44, 54\right]$ $m_{3}^{\sigma _{3}}\left(c^{\prime }\right) \in \left[16, 26\right]$ $\sigma _{4} = \left(2, 3, 1\right)$ $m_{1}^{\sigma _{4}}\left(c^{\prime }\right) \in \left[0, 0\right]$ $m_{2}^{\sigma _{4}}\left(c^{\prime }\right) \in \left[44, 54\right]$ $m_{3}^{\sigma _{4}}\left(c^{\prime }\right) \in \left[16, 26\right]$ $\sigma _{5} = \left(3, 1, 2\right)$ $m_{1}^{\sigma _{5}}\left(c^{\prime }\right) \in \left[0, 0\right]$ $m_{2}^{\sigma _{5}}\left(c^{\prime }\right) \in \left[0, 0\right]$ $m_{3}^{\sigma _{5}}\left(c^{\prime }\right) \in \left[60, 80\right]$ $\sigma _{6} = \left(3, 2, 1\right)$ $m_{1}^{\sigma _{6}}\left(c^{\prime }\right) \in \left[0, 0\right]$ $m_{2}^{\sigma _{6}}\left(c^{\prime }\right) \in \left[0, 0\right]$ $m_{3}^{\sigma _{6}}\left(c^{\prime }\right) \in \left[60, 80\right]$
 $\sigma$ $m_{1}^{\sigma }\left(c^{\prime }\right)$ $m_{2}^{\sigma }\left(c^{\prime }\right)$ $m_{3}^{\sigma }\left(c^{\prime }\right)$ $\sigma _{1} = \left(1, 2, 3\right)$ $m_{1}^{\sigma _{1}}\left(c^{\prime }\right) \in \left[30, 36\right]$ $m_{2}^{\sigma _{1}}\left(c^{\prime }\right) \in \left[14, 18\right]$ $m_{3}^{\sigma _{1}}\left(c^{\prime }\right) \in \left[16, 26\right]$ $\sigma _{2} = \left(1, 3, 2\right)$ $m_{1}^{\sigma _{2}}\left(c^{\prime }\right) \in \left[30, 36\right]$ $m_{2}^{\sigma _{2}}\left(c^{\prime }\right) \in \left[0, 0\right]$ $m_{3}^{\sigma _{2}}\left(c^{\prime }\right) \in \left[30, 44\right]$ $\sigma _{3} = \left(2, 1, 3\right)$ $m_{1}^{\sigma _{3}}\left(c^{\prime }\right) \in \left[0, 0\right]$ $m_{2}^{\sigma _{3}}\left(c^{\prime }\right) \in \left[44, 54\right]$ $m_{3}^{\sigma _{3}}\left(c^{\prime }\right) \in \left[16, 26\right]$ $\sigma _{4} = \left(2, 3, 1\right)$ $m_{1}^{\sigma _{4}}\left(c^{\prime }\right) \in \left[0, 0\right]$ $m_{2}^{\sigma _{4}}\left(c^{\prime }\right) \in \left[44, 54\right]$ $m_{3}^{\sigma _{4}}\left(c^{\prime }\right) \in \left[16, 26\right]$ $\sigma _{5} = \left(3, 1, 2\right)$ $m_{1}^{\sigma _{5}}\left(c^{\prime }\right) \in \left[0, 0\right]$ $m_{2}^{\sigma _{5}}\left(c^{\prime }\right) \in \left[0, 0\right]$ $m_{3}^{\sigma _{5}}\left(c^{\prime }\right) \in \left[60, 80\right]$ $\sigma _{6} = \left(3, 2, 1\right)$ $m_{1}^{\sigma _{6}}\left(c^{\prime }\right) \in \left[0, 0\right]$ $m_{2}^{\sigma _{6}}\left(c^{\prime }\right) \in \left[0, 0\right]$ $m_{3}^{\sigma _{6}}\left(c^{\prime }\right) \in \left[60, 80\right]$
 [1] Sergio Zamora. Tori can't collapse to an interval. Electronic Research Archive, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/era.2021005 [2] Nguyen Thi Kim Son, Nguyen Phuong Dong, Le Hoang Son, Alireza Khastan, Hoang Viet Long. Complete controllability for a class of fractional evolution equations with uncertainty. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2020  doi: 10.3934/eect.2020104 [3] Mehdi Badsi. Collisional sheath solutions of a bi-species Vlasov-Poisson-Boltzmann boundary value problem. Kinetic & Related Models, 2021, 14 (1) : 149-174. doi: 10.3934/krm.2020052 [4] Sushil Kumar Dey, Bibhas C. Giri. Coordination of a sustainable reverse supply chain with revenue sharing contract. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020165 [5] Laura Aquilanti, Simone Cacace, Fabio Camilli, Raul De Maio. A Mean Field Games model for finite mixtures of Bernoulli and categorical distributions. Journal of Dynamics & Games, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jdg.2020033 [6] Marek Macák, Róbert Čunderlík, Karol Mikula, Zuzana Minarechová. Computational optimization in solving the geodetic boundary value problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (3) : 987-999. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020381 [7] Nguyen Huy Tuan. On an initial and final value problem for fractional nonclassical diffusion equations of Kirchhoff type. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020354 [8] Vo Van Au, Hossein Jafari, Zakia Hammouch, Nguyen Huy Tuan. On a final value problem for a nonlinear fractional pseudo-parabolic equation. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29 (1) : 1709-1734. doi: 10.3934/era.2020088 [9] Nguyen Huu Can, Nguyen Huy Tuan, Donal O'Regan, Vo Van Au. On a final value problem for a class of nonlinear hyperbolic equations with damping term. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2021, 10 (1) : 103-127. doi: 10.3934/eect.2020053 [10] Antoine Benoit. Weak well-posedness of hyperbolic boundary value problems in a strip: when instabilities do not reflect the geometry. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (12) : 5475-5486. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020248 [11] Mokhtar Bouloudene, Manar A. Alqudah, Fahd Jarad, Yassine Adjabi, Thabet Abdeljawad. Nonlinear singular $p$ -Laplacian boundary value problems in the frame of conformable derivative. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020442 [12] Yi Zhou, Jianli Liu. The initial-boundary value problem on a strip for the equation of time-like extremal surfaces. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2009, 23 (1&2) : 381-397. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.23.381 [13] Amru Hussein, Martin Saal, Marc Wrona. Primitive equations with horizontal viscosity: The initial value and The time-periodic problem for physical boundary conditions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020398 [14] Vo Van Au, Mokhtar Kirane, Nguyen Huy Tuan. On a terminal value problem for a system of parabolic equations with nonlinear-nonlocal diffusion terms. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (3) : 1579-1613. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020174 [15] Kazunori Matsui. Sharp consistency estimates for a pressure-Poisson problem with Stokes boundary value problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (3) : 1001-1015. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020380 [16] Tong Peng. Designing prorated lifetime warranty strategy for high-value and durable products under two-dimensional warranty. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (2) : 953-970. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020006 [17] Vaibhav Mehandiratta, Mani Mehra, Günter Leugering. Existence results and stability analysis for a nonlinear fractional boundary value problem on a circular ring with an attached edge : A study of fractional calculus on metric graph. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2021  doi: 10.3934/nhm.2021003 [18] Qingfang Wang, Hua Yang. Solutions of nonlocal problem with critical exponent. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (12) : 5591-5608. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020253 [19] Peter Poláčik, Pavol Quittner. Entire and ancient solutions of a supercritical semilinear heat equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (1) : 413-438. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020136 [20] Anna Abbatiello, Eduard Feireisl, Antoní Novotný. Generalized solutions to models of compressible viscous fluids. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (1) : 1-28. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020345

Impact Factor: