# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

July  2021, 8(3): 167-188. doi: 10.3934/jdg.2021004

## Systems theory and analysis of the implementation of non pharmaceutical policies for the mitigation of the COVID-19 pandemic

 1 Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Political Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece 2 University of Cagliari, Italy

* Corresponding author: Costas Poulios

Received  July 2019 Revised  December 2020 Published  July 2021 Early access  March 2021

We utilize systems theory in the study of the implementation of non pharmaceutical strategies for the mitigation of the COVID-19 pandemic. We present two models. The first one is a model of predictive control with receding horizon and discontinuous actions of unknown costs for the implementation of adaptive triggering policies during the disease. This model is based on a periodic assessment of the peak of the pandemic (and, thus, of the health care demand) utilizing the latest data about the transmission and recovery rate of the disease. Consequently, the model seems to be suitable for discontinuous, non-mechanical (i.e. human) actions with unknown effectiveness, like those applied in the case of COVID-19. Secondly, we consider a feedback control problem in order to contain the pandemic at the capacity of the NHS (National Health System). As input parameter we consider the value $p$ that reflects the intensity-effectiveness of the measures applied and as output the predicted maximum of infected people to be treated by NHS. The feedback control regulates $p$ so that the number of infected people is manageable. Based on this approach, we address the following questions: (a) the limits of improvement of this approach; (b) the effectiveness of this approach; (c) the time horizon and timing of the application.

Citation: John Leventides, Costas Poulios, Georgios Alkis Tsiatsios, Maria Livada, Stavros Tsipras, Konstantinos Lefcaditis, Panagiota Sargenti, Aleka Sargenti. Systems theory and analysis of the implementation of non pharmaceutical policies for the mitigation of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Dynamics & Games, 2021, 8 (3) : 167-188. doi: 10.3934/jdg.2021004
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
Visualization of the SIR model with random $\beta$ and $\gamma$ in time $t$. As initial values, S(0) = 999, I(0) = 1 and R(0) = 0 were chosen
Mitigation strategy scenarios for UK showing critical care bed requirements. Source: Ferguson et al. (2020)
Feedback control for the implementation of social distancing policies
The evolution of the number $I(t)$ of infected people in the case where no mitigation measures are applied
The evolution of the number $I(t)$ of infected people (on the left) and of the parameter $p$ (on the right) in the case where a feedback control scenario with $\lambda = 0.0025$ is applied
The evolution of the number $I(t)$ of infected people (on the left) and of the parameter $p$ (on the right) in the case where a feedback control scenario $\lambda = 0.002$ is applied
The evolution of the number $I(t)$ of infected people (on the left) and of the parameter $p$ (on the right) in the case where a feedback control scenario $\lambda = 0.002$ is applied with a delay of $T = 2$ unit times
]">Figure 8.  According to WHO there are 4, 761, 559 confirmed cases. Source: WHO (2020) [17]
]">Figure 9.  According to John Hopkins University there are 4, 927, 487 confirmed cases. Source:John Hopkins University (2020) [19]
]">Figure 10.  According to Harvard and the Children hospital there are 9, 474, 948 confirmed cases. Source: Harvard (2020) [18]
Daily evolution of $b$ for 21 countries starting the 22/1/2020 and finishes the 8/5/2020
Estimation of progress for the average $\beta(t)$ in time $t$. The black dots are the average values of $\beta$ and the red line is the polynomial best fit line
Daily evolution of the average $I_{\max}$ and the $I(t)$ from 4 countries as an indicative trend, starting the 22/1/2020 and finishes the 8/5/2020. The blue line represent the $I(t)$ and the red the $I_{\max}$
Summary of NPI interventions considered
 Label Policy Description CI Case isolation in the home Symptomatic cases stay at home for 7 days, reducing non-household contacts by 75% for this period. Household contacts remain unchanged. Assume 70% of household comply with the policy. HQ Voluntary home quarantine Following identification of a symptomatic case in the household, all household members remain at home for 14 days. Household contact rates double during this quarantine period, contacts in the community reduce by 75%. Assume 50% of household comply with the policy. SDO Social distancing of those over 70 years of age Reduce contacts by 50% in workplaces, increase household contacts by 25% and reduce other contacts by 75%. Assume 75% compliance with policy. SD Social distancing of entire population All households reduce contact outside household, school or workplace by 75%. School contact rates unchanged, workplace contact rates reduced by 25%. Household contact rates assumed to increase by 25%. PC Closure of schools and universities Closure of all schools, 25% of universities remain open. Household contact rates for student families increase by 50% during closure. Contacts in the community increase by 25% during closure.
 Label Policy Description CI Case isolation in the home Symptomatic cases stay at home for 7 days, reducing non-household contacts by 75% for this period. Household contacts remain unchanged. Assume 70% of household comply with the policy. HQ Voluntary home quarantine Following identification of a symptomatic case in the household, all household members remain at home for 14 days. Household contact rates double during this quarantine period, contacts in the community reduce by 75%. Assume 50% of household comply with the policy. SDO Social distancing of those over 70 years of age Reduce contacts by 50% in workplaces, increase household contacts by 25% and reduce other contacts by 75%. Assume 75% compliance with policy. SD Social distancing of entire population All households reduce contact outside household, school or workplace by 75%. School contact rates unchanged, workplace contact rates reduced by 25%. Household contact rates assumed to increase by 25%. PC Closure of schools and universities Closure of all schools, 25% of universities remain open. Household contact rates for student families increase by 50% during closure. Contacts in the community increase by 25% during closure.
Sample of twenty-one countries from the 267 countries and big cities. For China the city of Beijing was chosen. The $b$ parameter was estimated by using Equation (18)
 COUNTRY $b$ parameter SWISS 0.257158556 BRAZIL 0.233817403 ITALY 0.203539698 NORWAY 0.197869991 SPAIN 0.19306215 EGYPT 0.19012821 USA 0.189437334 PAKISTAN 0.184307553 BELGIUM 0.178032037 ETHIOPIA 0.167117704 RUSSIA 0.160845659 FRANCE 0.153958202 UK 0.153852808 GERMANY 0.153678417 SOUTH KOREA 0.148665135 SWEDEN 0.141608744 BULGARIA 0.141558434 CYPRUS 0.132396806 GREECE 0.120185025 ALBANIA 0.109905162 CHINA 0.053298278
 COUNTRY $b$ parameter SWISS 0.257158556 BRAZIL 0.233817403 ITALY 0.203539698 NORWAY 0.197869991 SPAIN 0.19306215 EGYPT 0.19012821 USA 0.189437334 PAKISTAN 0.184307553 BELGIUM 0.178032037 ETHIOPIA 0.167117704 RUSSIA 0.160845659 FRANCE 0.153958202 UK 0.153852808 GERMANY 0.153678417 SOUTH KOREA 0.148665135 SWEDEN 0.141608744 BULGARIA 0.141558434 CYPRUS 0.132396806 GREECE 0.120185025 ALBANIA 0.109905162 CHINA 0.053298278
 [1] Hailiang Liu, Xuping Tian. Data-driven optimal control of a seir model for COVID-19. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2021093 [2] Jorge Rebaza. On a model of COVID-19 dynamics. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29 (2) : 2129-2140. doi: 10.3934/era.2020108 [3] Emiliano Alvarez, Juan Gabriel Brida, Lucía Rosich, Erick Limas. Analysis of communities of countries with similar dynamics of the COVID-19 pandemic evolution. Journal of Dynamics & Games, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jdg.2021026 [4] Kazuyuki Yagasaki. Optimal control of the SIR epidemic model based on dynamical systems theory. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021144 [5] Tailei Zhang, Zhimin Li. Analysis of COVID-19 epidemic transmission trend based on a time-delayed dynamic model. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2021088 [6] Tao Zheng, Yantao Luo, Xinran Zhou, Long Zhang, Zhidong Teng. Spatial dynamic analysis for COVID-19 epidemic model with diffusion and Beddington-DeAngelis type incidence. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2021154 [7] João M. Lemos, Fernando Machado, Nuno Nogueira, Luís Rato, Manuel Rijo. Adaptive and non-adaptive model predictive control of an irrigation channel. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2009, 4 (2) : 303-324. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2009.4.303 [8] Zi Sang, Zhipeng Qiu, Xiefei Yan, Yun Zou. Assessing the effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions on containing an emerging disease. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2012, 9 (1) : 147-164. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2012.9.147 [9] Nitu Kumari, Sumit Kumar, Sandeep Sharma, Fateh Singh, Rana Parshad. Basic reproduction number estimation and forecasting of COVID-19: A case study of India, Brazil and Peru. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2021170 [10] James P. Nelson, Mark J. Balas. Direct model reference adaptive control of linear systems with input/output delays. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2013, 3 (3) : 445-462. doi: 10.3934/naco.2013.3.445 [11] Notice Ringa, Chris T. Bauch. Spatially-implicit modelling of disease-behaviour interactions in the context of non-pharmaceutical interventions. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2018, 15 (2) : 461-483. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018021 [12] Tayel Dabbous. Adaptive control of nonlinear systems using fuzzy systems. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2010, 6 (4) : 861-880. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2010.6.861 [13] M. Predescu, R. Levins, T. Awerbuch-Friedlander. Analysis of a nonlinear system for community intervention in mosquito control. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2006, 6 (3) : 605-622. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2006.6.605 [14] Rohit Gupta, Farhad Jafari, Robert J. Kipka, Boris S. Mordukhovich. Linear openness and feedback stabilization of nonlinear control systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 11 (6) : 1103-1119. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2018063 [15] Sanling Yuan, Yongli Song, Junhui Li. Oscillations in a plasmid turbidostat model with delayed feedback control. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2011, 15 (3) : 893-914. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2011.15.893 [16] Shu Zhang, Jian Xu. Time-varying delayed feedback control for an internet congestion control model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2011, 16 (2) : 653-668. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2011.16.653 [17] Hassan Tahir, Asaf Khan, Anwarud Din, Amir Khan, Gul Zaman. Optimal control strategy for an age-structured SIR endemic model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (7) : 2535-2555. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2021054 [18] Qiying Hu, Chen Xu, Wuyi Yue. A unified model for state feedback of discrete event systems II: Control synthesis problems. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2008, 4 (4) : 713-726. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2008.4.713 [19] Changzhi Wu, Kok Lay Teo, Volker Rehbock. Optimal control of piecewise affine systems with piecewise affine state feedback. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2009, 5 (4) : 737-747. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2009.5.737 [20] V. Rehbock, K.L. Teo, L.S. Jennings. Suboptimal feedback control for a class of nonlinear systems using spline interpolation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1995, 1 (2) : 223-236. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1995.1.223

Impact Factor: