Linear phase space deformations with angular momentum symmetry

Previous Article
Geometry of Routh reduction
JGM Home
This Issue
Next Article
A geometric perspective on the Piola identity in Riemannian settings

March 2019, 11(1): 45-58. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2019003

Linear phase space deformations with angular momentum symmetry

Claudio Meneses ^,

Mathematisches Seminar, Christian-Albrechts Universität zu Kiel, Ludewig-Meyn-Str. 4, 24118 Kiel, Germany

* Corresponding author: Claudio Meneses

Received March 2018 Revised November 2018 Published January 2019

Fund Project: The author is supported by the DFG SPP 2026 priority programme "Geometry at infinity"

Motivated by the work of Leznov-Mostovoy [17], we classify the linear deformations of standard $ 2n $-dimensional phase space that preserve the obvious symplectic $ \mathfrak{o}(n) $-symmetry. As a consequence, we describe standard phase space, as well as $ T^{*}S^{n} $ and $ T^{*}\mathbb{H}^{n} $ with their standard symplectic forms, as degenerations of a 3-dimensional family of coadjoint orbits, which in a generic regime are identified with the Grassmannian of oriented 2-planes in $ {\mathbb{R}}^{n+2} $.

Keywords: Coadjoint orbits, Lie algebra deformations, momentum maps.

Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 17B08, 17B56, 17B80; Secondary: 53D20, 14H70.

Citation: Claudio Meneses. Linear phase space deformations with angular momentum symmetry. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2019, 11 (1) : 45-58. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2019003

References:

[1]	A. Borel, Kählerian coset spaces of semisimple Lie groups, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 40 (1954), 1147-1151. doi: 10.1073/pnas.40.12.1147. Google Scholar
[2]	O. M. Boyarskyi and T. V. Skrypnik, Degenerate orbits of adjoint representation of orthogonal and unitary groups regarded as algebraic submanifolds, Ukrainian Math. J., 49 (1997), 1003-1015. doi: 10.1007/BF02528745. Google Scholar
[3]	C. Chevalley and S. Eilenberg, Cohomology theory of Lie groups and Lie algebras, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 63 (1948), 85-124. doi: 10.2307/1990637. Google Scholar
[4]	A. Fialowski, Deformations of Lie algebras, Mat. Sb. (N. S.), 127 (1985), 476-482. Google Scholar
[5]	D. M. Fradkin, Three-dimensional isotropic harmonic oscillator and $SU_3$, Am. J. Phys., 33 (1965), 207-211. doi: 10.1119/1.1971373. Google Scholar
[6]	M. Gerstenhaber, On the deformation of rings and algebras, Ann. Math., 79 (1964), 59-103. doi: 10.2307/1970484. Google Scholar
[7]	V. Guillemin and S. Sternberg, Symplectic Techniques in Physics, Cambridge University Press, 1984. Google Scholar
[8]	_____, Variations on a Theme by Kepler, Colloquium Publications, Vol. 42, American Mathematical Soc., 2006.Google Scholar
[9]	P. W. Higgs, Dynamical symmetries in a spherical geometry I, J. Phys. A, 12 (1979), 309-323. Google Scholar
[10]	G. Hochschild and J.-P. Serre, Cohomology of Lie algebras, Ann. Math., 57 (1953), 591-603. doi: 10.2307/1969740. Google Scholar
[11]	R. Howe, Remarks on classical invariant theory, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 313 (1989), 539-570. doi: 10.2307/2001418. Google Scholar
[12]	E. Inonu and E. P. Wigner, On the contraction of groups and their representations, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 39 (1953), 510-524. doi: 10.1073/pnas.39.6.510. Google Scholar
[13]	D. Kazhdan, B. Kostant and S. Sternberg, Hamiltonian group actions and dynamical systems of Calogero type, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 31 (1978), 481-507. doi: 10.1002/cpa.3160310405. Google Scholar
[14]	A. A. Kirillov, Lectures on the Orbit Method, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 64, American Mathematical Soc., 2004. doi: 10.1090/gsm/064. Google Scholar
[15]	W. Lenz, Über den Bewegungsverlauf und die Quantenzustände der gestörten Keplerbewegung, Z. Phys., 24 (1924), 197-207. Google Scholar
[16]	M. Levy-Nahas, Deformation and contraction of Lie algebras, J. Math. Phys., 8 (1967), 1211-1222. doi: 10.1063/1.1705338. Google Scholar
[17]	A. Leznov and J. Mostovoy, Classical dynamics in deformed spaces, J. Phys. A, 36 (2003), 1439-1449. doi: 10.1088/0305-4470/36/5/317. Google Scholar
[18]	S. P. Novikov, The Hamiltonian formalism and a multivalued analogue of Morse theory, Uspekhi Mat. Nauk, 37 (1982), 3-49. Google Scholar
[19]	A. Perelomov, Integrable Systems of Classical Mechanics and Lie Algebras, Birkhäuser, 1990. doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-9257-5. Google Scholar
[20]	A. Reyman and M. A. Semenov-Tian-Shansky, Group-theoretical methods in the theory of finite-dimensional integrable systems, Dynamical Systems VII, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 16 (1994), 116-225. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-06796-3_7. Google Scholar
[21]	C. A. Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra, Studies in Advanced Mathematics, Vol. 38, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139644136. Google Scholar
[22]	J. Wolf, Representations associated to minimal co-adjoint orbits, Differential Geometrical Methods in Mathematical Physics II., Springer Berlin Heidelberg, (1978), 329-349. Google Scholar

show all references

References:

[1]	A. Borel, Kählerian coset spaces of semisimple Lie groups, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 40 (1954), 1147-1151. doi: 10.1073/pnas.40.12.1147. Google Scholar
[2]	O. M. Boyarskyi and T. V. Skrypnik, Degenerate orbits of adjoint representation of orthogonal and unitary groups regarded as algebraic submanifolds, Ukrainian Math. J., 49 (1997), 1003-1015. doi: 10.1007/BF02528745. Google Scholar
[3]	C. Chevalley and S. Eilenberg, Cohomology theory of Lie groups and Lie algebras, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 63 (1948), 85-124. doi: 10.2307/1990637. Google Scholar
[4]	A. Fialowski, Deformations of Lie algebras, Mat. Sb. (N. S.), 127 (1985), 476-482. Google Scholar
[5]	D. M. Fradkin, Three-dimensional isotropic harmonic oscillator and $SU_3$, Am. J. Phys., 33 (1965), 207-211. doi: 10.1119/1.1971373. Google Scholar
[6]	M. Gerstenhaber, On the deformation of rings and algebras, Ann. Math., 79 (1964), 59-103. doi: 10.2307/1970484. Google Scholar
[7]	V. Guillemin and S. Sternberg, Symplectic Techniques in Physics, Cambridge University Press, 1984. Google Scholar
[8]	_____, Variations on a Theme by Kepler, Colloquium Publications, Vol. 42, American Mathematical Soc., 2006.Google Scholar
[9]	P. W. Higgs, Dynamical symmetries in a spherical geometry I, J. Phys. A, 12 (1979), 309-323. Google Scholar
[10]	G. Hochschild and J.-P. Serre, Cohomology of Lie algebras, Ann. Math., 57 (1953), 591-603. doi: 10.2307/1969740. Google Scholar
[11]	R. Howe, Remarks on classical invariant theory, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 313 (1989), 539-570. doi: 10.2307/2001418. Google Scholar
[12]	E. Inonu and E. P. Wigner, On the contraction of groups and their representations, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 39 (1953), 510-524. doi: 10.1073/pnas.39.6.510. Google Scholar
[13]	D. Kazhdan, B. Kostant and S. Sternberg, Hamiltonian group actions and dynamical systems of Calogero type, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 31 (1978), 481-507. doi: 10.1002/cpa.3160310405. Google Scholar
[14]	A. A. Kirillov, Lectures on the Orbit Method, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 64, American Mathematical Soc., 2004. doi: 10.1090/gsm/064. Google Scholar
[15]	W. Lenz, Über den Bewegungsverlauf und die Quantenzustände der gestörten Keplerbewegung, Z. Phys., 24 (1924), 197-207. Google Scholar
[16]	M. Levy-Nahas, Deformation and contraction of Lie algebras, J. Math. Phys., 8 (1967), 1211-1222. doi: 10.1063/1.1705338. Google Scholar
[17]	A. Leznov and J. Mostovoy, Classical dynamics in deformed spaces, J. Phys. A, 36 (2003), 1439-1449. doi: 10.1088/0305-4470/36/5/317. Google Scholar
[18]	S. P. Novikov, The Hamiltonian formalism and a multivalued analogue of Morse theory, Uspekhi Mat. Nauk, 37 (1982), 3-49. Google Scholar
[19]	A. Perelomov, Integrable Systems of Classical Mechanics and Lie Algebras, Birkhäuser, 1990. doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-9257-5. Google Scholar
[20]	A. Reyman and M. A. Semenov-Tian-Shansky, Group-theoretical methods in the theory of finite-dimensional integrable systems, Dynamical Systems VII, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 16 (1994), 116-225. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-06796-3_7. Google Scholar
[21]	C. A. Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra, Studies in Advanced Mathematics, Vol. 38, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139644136. Google Scholar
[22]	J. Wolf, Representations associated to minimal co-adjoint orbits, Differential Geometrical Methods in Mathematical Physics II., Springer Berlin Heidelberg, (1978), 329-349. Google Scholar

[1]	Chris Bernhardt. Vertex maps for trees: Algebra and periods of periodic orbits. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2006, 14 (3) : 399-408. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.14.399
[2]	Richard H. Cushman, Jędrzej Śniatycki. On Lie algebra actions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 0 (0) : 1-15. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020066
[3]	Franz W. Kamber and Peter W. Michor. Completing Lie algebra actions to Lie group actions. Electronic Research Announcements, 2004, 10: 1-10.
[4]	Viviane Baladi, Daniel Smania. Smooth deformations of piecewise expanding unimodal maps. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2009, 23 (3) : 685-703. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.23.685
[5]	Oǧul Esen, Hasan Gümral. Geometry of plasma dynamics II: Lie algebra of Hamiltonian vector fields. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2012, 4 (3) : 239-269. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2012.4.239
[6]	Giovanni De Matteis, Gianni Manno. Lie algebra symmetry analysis of the Helfrich and Willmore surface shape equations. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2014, 13 (1) : 453-481. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2014.13.453
[7]	Miguel Mendes. A note on the coding of orbits in certain discontinuous maps. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2010, 27 (1) : 369-382. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.27.369
[8]	Héctor E. Lomelí. Heteroclinic orbits and rotation sets for twist maps. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2006, 14 (2) : 343-354. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.14.343
[9]	Tifei Qian, Zhihong Xia. Heteroclinic orbits and chaotic invariant sets for monotone twist maps. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2003, 9 (1) : 69-95. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2003.9.69
[10]	Daniel Wilczak, Piotr Zgliczyński. Topological method for symmetric periodic orbits for maps with a reversing symmetry. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2007, 17 (3) : 629-652. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2007.17.629
[11]	Flaviano Battelli, Claudio Lazzari. On the bifurcation from critical homoclinic orbits in n-dimensional maps. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 1997, 3 (2) : 289-303. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1997.3.289
[12]	Daniel Fusca. The Madelung transform as a momentum map. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2017, 9 (2) : 157-165. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2017006
[13]	Alain Chenciner. The angular momentum of a relative equilibrium. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2013, 33 (3) : 1033-1047. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.1033
[14]	Venkateswaran P. Krishnan, Ramesh Manna, Suman Kumar Sahoo, Vladimir A. Sharafutdinov. Momentum ray transforms. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2019, 13 (3) : 679-701. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2019031
[15]	Joshua Cape, Hans-Christian Herbig, Christopher Seaton. Symplectic reduction at zero angular momentum. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2016, 8 (1) : 13-34. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2016.8.13
[16]	Àngel Jorba, Pau Rabassa, Joan Carles Tatjer. Superstable periodic orbits of 1d maps under quasi-periodic forcing and reducibility loss. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2014, 34 (2) : 589-597. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.589
[17]	Hari Bercovici, Viorel Niţică. A Banach algebra version of the Livsic theorem. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 1998, 4 (3) : 523-534. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1998.4.523
[18]	K. A. Ariyawansa, Leonid Berlyand, Alexander Panchenko. A network model of geometrically constrained deformations of granular materials. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2008, 3 (1) : 125-148. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2008.3.125
[19]	Gabriel P. Paternain. On two noteworthy deformations of negatively curved Riemannian metrics. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 1999, 5 (3) : 639-650. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1999.5.639
[20]	Heinz-Jürgen Flad, Gohar Harutyunyan. Ellipticity of quantum mechanical Hamiltonians in the edge algebra. Conference Publications, 2011, 2011 (Special) : 420-429. doi: 10.3934/proc.2011.2011.420

American Institute of Mathematical Sciences