American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
December  2021, 13(4): 629-646. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2021022

Explicit solutions of the kinetic and potential matching conditions of the energy shaping method

Sergio Grillo 1, , Leandro Salomone 2, and  Marcela Zuccalli 3,

1. 

Centro Atómico Bariloche and Instituto Balseiro, 8400 S.C. de Bariloche, and CONICET, Argentina
2. 

CMaLP, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, UNLP, 1900 La Plata, and CONICET, Argentina
3. 

CMaLP, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, UNLP, 1900 La Plata, Argentina

Received  September 2018 Revised  June 2021 Published  December 2021 Early access  August 2021

Fund Project: S. Grillo and L. Salomone thank CONICET for its financial support

In the context of underactuated Hamiltonian systems defined by simple Hamiltonian functions, the matching conditions of the energy shaping method split into two decoupled subsets of equations: the kinetic and potential equations. The unknown of the kinetic equation is a metric on the configuration space of the system, while the unknown of the potential equation are the same metric and a positive-definite function around some critical point of the Hamiltonian function. In this paper, assuming that a solution of the kinetic equation is given, we find conditions (in the $ C^{\infty} $ category) for the existence of positive-definite solutions of the potential equation and, moreover, we present a procedure to construct, up to quadratures, some of these solutions. In order to illustrate such a procedure, we consider the subclass of systems with one degree of underactuation, where we find in addition a concrete formula for the general solution of the kinetic equation. As a byproduct, new global and local expressions of the matching conditions are presented in the paper.

Keywords: Hamiltonian systems, underactuated systems, closed-loop systems, energy shaping, integration by quadratures.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 93D05, 93D20; Secondary: 93C10.
Citation: Sergio Grillo, Leandro Salomone, Marcela Zuccalli. Explicit solutions of the kinetic and potential matching conditions of the energy shaping method. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2021, 13 (4) : 629-646. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2021022
References:
[1]

R. Abraham and J. E. Marsden, Foundation of Mechanics, Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co., Inc., Advanced Book Program, Reading, Mass., 1978.  Google Scholar

[2]

V. I. Arnol'd, Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 60, Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg, 1978. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-1693-1.  Google Scholar

[3]

A. M. Bloch, Nonholonomic Mechanics and Control, Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics, 24, Systems and Control, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2003. doi: 10.1007/b97376.  Google Scholar

[4] W. M. Boothby, An Introduction to Differentiable Manifolds and Riemannian Geometry, Pure and Applied Mathematics, 63, Academic Press, New York-London, 1975.   Google Scholar
[5]

F. Bullo and A. D. Lewis, Geometric Control of Mechanical Systems. Modeling, Analysis, and Design for Simple Mechanical Control Systems, Texts in Applied Mathematics, 49, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2005. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-7276-7.  Google Scholar

[6]

D. E. Chang, Generalization of the IDA-PBC method for stabilization of mechanical systems, 18th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, MED'10, Marrakech, Morocco, 2010. doi: 10.1109/MED.2010.5547672.  Google Scholar

[7]

D. E. Chang, The method of controlled Lagrangians: Energy plus force shaping, SIAM J. Control Optim., 48 (2010), 4821-4845.  doi: 10.1137/070691310.  Google Scholar

[8]

D. E. Chang, On the method of interconnection and damping assignment passivity-based control for the stabilization of mechanical systems, Regul. Chaotic Dyn., 19 (2014), 556-575.  doi: 10.1134/S1560354714050049.  Google Scholar

[9]

D. E. Chang, Stabilizability of controlled Lagrangian systems of two degrees of freedom and one degree of under-actuation by the energy-shaping method, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 55 (2010), 1888-1893.  doi: 10.1109/TAC.2010.2049279.  Google Scholar

[10]

D. E. Chang, A. M. Bloch, N. E. Leonard, J. E. Marsden and C. A. Wollsey, The equivalence of controlled Lagrangian and controlled Hamiltonian systems, ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var., 8 (2002), 393-422.  doi: 10.1051/cocv:2002045.  Google Scholar

[11]

B. Gharesifard, Stabilization of systems with one degree of underactuation with energy shaping: A geometric approach, SIAM J. Control Optim., 49 (2011), 1422-1434.  doi: 10.1137/09076698X.  Google Scholar

[12]

H. Goldschmidt, Existence theorems for analytic linear partial differential equations, Ann. of Math. (2), 86 (1967), 246-270.  doi: 10.2307/1970689.  Google Scholar

[13]

S. D. Grillo, L. M. Salomone and M. Zuccalli, Asymptotic stabilizability of underactuated Hamiltonian systems with two degrees of freedom, Russ. J. Nonlinear Dyn., 15 (2019), 309-326.  doi: 10.20537/nd190309.  Google Scholar

[14]

S. D. Grillo, L. M. Salomone and M. Zuccalli, On the relationship between the energy shaping and the Lyapunov constraint based methods, J. Geom. Mech., 9 (2017), 459-486.  doi: 10.3934/jgm.2017018.  Google Scholar

[15]

J. Hamberg, Controlled Lagrangians, symmetries and conditions for strong matching, IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 33 (2000), 57-62.  doi: 10.1016/S1474-6670(17)35547-7.  Google Scholar

[16]

J. Hamberg, General matching conditions in the theory of controlled Lagrangians, Proceedings of the 38th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Phoenix, AZ, 1999. doi: 10.1109/CDC.1999.831306.  Google Scholar

[17]

S. Kobayashi and K. Nomizu, Foundations of Differential Geometry. Vol I, Interscience Publishers, a division of John Wiley & Sons, New York-London, 1963.  Google Scholar

[18]

A. D. Lewis, Potential energy shaping after kinetic energy shaping, Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, San Diego, CA, 2006. doi: 10.1109/CDC.2006.376885.  Google Scholar

[19]

J. E. Marsden and T. S. Ratiu, Introduction to Mechanics and Symmetry. A Basic Exposition of Classical Mechanical Systems, 2nd edition, Texts in Applied Mathematics, 17, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1999. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-21792-5.  Google Scholar

[20]

J. E. Marsden and T. S. Ratiu, Manifolds, Tensor Analysis and Applications, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2001. Google Scholar

[21]

J. G. Romero, A. Donaire and R. Ortega, Robust energy shaping control of mechanical systems, Systems Control Lett., 62 (2013), 770-780.  doi: 10.1016/j.sysconle.2013.05.011.  Google Scholar

[22]

D. Zenkov, Matching and stabilization of linear mechanical systems, Proceedings of 2002 International Symposium of Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems, South Bend, IN, 2002. Available from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=F5FAA6E2AB4998A2C00B8A5CDB0A461C?doi=10.1.1.12.7462&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

R. Abraham and J. E. Marsden, Foundation of Mechanics, Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co., Inc., Advanced Book Program, Reading, Mass., 1978.  Google Scholar

[2]

V. I. Arnol'd, Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 60, Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg, 1978. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-1693-1.  Google Scholar

[3]

A. M. Bloch, Nonholonomic Mechanics and Control, Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics, 24, Systems and Control, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2003. doi: 10.1007/b97376.  Google Scholar

[4] W. M. Boothby, An Introduction to Differentiable Manifolds and Riemannian Geometry, Pure and Applied Mathematics, 63, Academic Press, New York-London, 1975.   Google Scholar
[5]

F. Bullo and A. D. Lewis, Geometric Control of Mechanical Systems. Modeling, Analysis, and Design for Simple Mechanical Control Systems, Texts in Applied Mathematics, 49, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2005. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-7276-7.  Google Scholar

[6]

D. E. Chang, Generalization of the IDA-PBC method for stabilization of mechanical systems, 18th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, MED'10, Marrakech, Morocco, 2010. doi: 10.1109/MED.2010.5547672.  Google Scholar

[7]

D. E. Chang, The method of controlled Lagrangians: Energy plus force shaping, SIAM J. Control Optim., 48 (2010), 4821-4845.  doi: 10.1137/070691310.  Google Scholar

[8]

D. E. Chang, On the method of interconnection and damping assignment passivity-based control for the stabilization of mechanical systems, Regul. Chaotic Dyn., 19 (2014), 556-575.  doi: 10.1134/S1560354714050049.  Google Scholar

[9]

D. E. Chang, Stabilizability of controlled Lagrangian systems of two degrees of freedom and one degree of under-actuation by the energy-shaping method, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 55 (2010), 1888-1893.  doi: 10.1109/TAC.2010.2049279.  Google Scholar

[10]

D. E. Chang, A. M. Bloch, N. E. Leonard, J. E. Marsden and C. A. Wollsey, The equivalence of controlled Lagrangian and controlled Hamiltonian systems, ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var., 8 (2002), 393-422.  doi: 10.1051/cocv:2002045.  Google Scholar

[11]

B. Gharesifard, Stabilization of systems with one degree of underactuation with energy shaping: A geometric approach, SIAM J. Control Optim., 49 (2011), 1422-1434.  doi: 10.1137/09076698X.  Google Scholar

[12]

H. Goldschmidt, Existence theorems for analytic linear partial differential equations, Ann. of Math. (2), 86 (1967), 246-270.  doi: 10.2307/1970689.  Google Scholar

[13]

S. D. Grillo, L. M. Salomone and M. Zuccalli, Asymptotic stabilizability of underactuated Hamiltonian systems with two degrees of freedom, Russ. J. Nonlinear Dyn., 15 (2019), 309-326.  doi: 10.20537/nd190309.  Google Scholar

[14]

S. D. Grillo, L. M. Salomone and M. Zuccalli, On the relationship between the energy shaping and the Lyapunov constraint based methods, J. Geom. Mech., 9 (2017), 459-486.  doi: 10.3934/jgm.2017018.  Google Scholar

[15]

J. Hamberg, Controlled Lagrangians, symmetries and conditions for strong matching, IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 33 (2000), 57-62.  doi: 10.1016/S1474-6670(17)35547-7.  Google Scholar

[16]

J. Hamberg, General matching conditions in the theory of controlled Lagrangians, Proceedings of the 38th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Phoenix, AZ, 1999. doi: 10.1109/CDC.1999.831306.  Google Scholar

[17]

S. Kobayashi and K. Nomizu, Foundations of Differential Geometry. Vol I, Interscience Publishers, a division of John Wiley & Sons, New York-London, 1963.  Google Scholar

[18]

A. D. Lewis, Potential energy shaping after kinetic energy shaping, Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, San Diego, CA, 2006. doi: 10.1109/CDC.2006.376885.  Google Scholar

[19]

J. E. Marsden and T. S. Ratiu, Introduction to Mechanics and Symmetry. A Basic Exposition of Classical Mechanical Systems, 2nd edition, Texts in Applied Mathematics, 17, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1999. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-21792-5.  Google Scholar

[20]

J. E. Marsden and T. S. Ratiu, Manifolds, Tensor Analysis and Applications, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2001. Google Scholar

[21]

J. G. Romero, A. Donaire and R. Ortega, Robust energy shaping control of mechanical systems, Systems Control Lett., 62 (2013), 770-780.  doi: 10.1016/j.sysconle.2013.05.011.  Google Scholar

[22]

D. Zenkov, Matching and stabilization of linear mechanical systems, Proceedings of 2002 International Symposium of Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems, South Bend, IN, 2002. Available from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=F5FAA6E2AB4998A2C00B8A5CDB0A461C?doi=10.1.1.12.7462&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Google Scholar

Figure 1.  Planar inverted double pendulum
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

[1]

Simon Hochgerner. Symmetry actuated closed-loop Hamiltonian systems. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2020, 12 (4) : 641-669. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2020030
[2]

Morched Boughariou. Closed orbits of Hamiltonian systems on non-compact prescribed energy surfaces. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2003, 9 (3) : 603-616. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2003.9.603
[3]

Leonardo Colombo, David Martín de Diego. Optimal control of underactuated mechanical systems with symmetries. Conference Publications, 2013, 2013 (special) : 149-158. doi: 10.3934/proc.2013.2013.149
[4]

Sonia Martínez, Jorge Cortés, Francesco Bullo. A catalog of inverse-kinematics planners for underactuated systems on matrix groups. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2009, 1 (4) : 445-460. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2009.1.445
[5]

Mitsuru Shibayama. Periodic solutions for a prescribed-energy problem of singular Hamiltonian systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2017, 37 (5) : 2705-2715. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017116
[6]

Liang Ding, Rongrong Tian, Jinlong Wei. Nonconstant periodic solutions with any fixed energy for singular Hamiltonian systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (4) : 1617-1625. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018222
[7]

Jochen Schmid. Stabilization of port-Hamiltonian systems with discontinuous energy densities. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2022  doi: 10.3934/eect.2021063
[8]

Justine Yasappan, Ángela Jiménez-Casas, Mario Castro. Stabilizing interplay between thermodiffusion and viscoelasticity in a closed-loop thermosyphon. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2015, 20 (9) : 3267-3299. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2015.20.3267
[9]

Kenneth R. Meyer, Jesús F. Palacián, Patricia Yanguas. Normally stable hamiltonian systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2013, 33 (3) : 1201-1214. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.1201
[10]

Antonio Giorgilli. Unstable equilibria of Hamiltonian systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2001, 7 (4) : 855-871. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2001.7.855
[11]

Edward Hooton, Pavel Kravetc, Dmitrii Rachinskii, Qingwen Hu. Selective Pyragas control of Hamiltonian systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2019, 12 (7) : 2019-2034. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2019130
[12]

Wei Wang. Closed trajectories on symmetric convex Hamiltonian energy surfaces. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2012, 32 (2) : 679-701. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.679
[13]

Xiaochen Sun, Fei Hu, Yancong Zhou, Cheng-Chew Lim. Optimal acquisition, inventory and production decisions for a closed-loop manufacturing system with legislation constraint. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2015, 11 (4) : 1355-1373. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2015.11.1355
[14]

Yi Jing, Wenchuan Li. Integrated recycling-integrated production - distribution planning for decentralized closed-loop supply chain. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (2) : 511-539. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017058
[15]

Hanxiao Wang, Jingrui Sun, Jiongmin Yong. Weak closed-loop solvability of stochastic linear-quadratic optimal control problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2019, 39 (5) : 2785-2805. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019117
[16]

Pasquale Palumbo, Pierdomenico Pepe, Simona Panunzi, Andrea De Gaetano. Robust closed-loop control of plasma glycemia: A discrete-delay model approach. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2009, 12 (2) : 455-468. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2009.12.455
[17]

Wenbin Wang, Peng Zhang, Junfei Ding, Jian Li, Hao Sun, Lingyun He. Closed-loop supply chain network equilibrium model with retailer-collection under legislation. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2019, 15 (1) : 199-219. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018039
[18]

Reza Lotfi, Yahia Zare Mehrjerdi, Mir Saman Pishvaee, Ahmad Sadeghieh, Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber. A robust optimization model for sustainable and resilient closed-loop supply chain network design considering conditional value at risk. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (2) : 221-253. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020023
[19]

Benrong Zheng, Xianpei Hong. Effects of take-back legislation on pricing and coordination in a closed-loop supply chain. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021035
[20]

Filippo Cacace, Valerio Cusimano, Alfredo Germani, Pasquale Palumbo, Federico Papa. Closed-loop control of tumor growth by means of anti-angiogenic administration. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2018, 15 (4) : 827-839. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018037

2020 Impact Factor: 0.857

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (139)
  • HTML views (208)
  • Cited by (0)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2022 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences | Privacy Policy